CLIENT’S BRIEF

CLIENT’S PROFILE

CLIENT: Taylor’s University Lakeside CampusRepresentative: Ms Alia Ahmad, Ar Sateerah and Ar Emmanuel

BRIEF

To propose a new recreational area. To manage and facilitate any future outdoor activities for staff and studentsTo create a common bond within the campus community.

BUDGET: RM 1,500,000.00

SPACES TO BE PROVIDED (Indoor and partially outdoor)• Office(max 3 person)• Lounge• Toilets (2 units each M/F)• Indoor/outdoor recreation area(darts, carom, congkak, table tennis, table games –monopoly, scrabble etc. • Cafeteria (20 people)• Magazine corner

BRIEF

STRUCTURE• Light weight, fast construction• (container design is allowed)

MATERIAL• Insulated wall• Finishes, fixtures with good quality and workmanship

EXISTING CONDITION • Existing large trees to remain undisturbed

THEME• Contemporary • Low energy (natural ventilation, lighting)• Reusable energy (rain water harvesting)

MECHANICAL REQUIREMENT• Air Cond (only if necessary)• Low energy light fittings

LANDSCAPE• Trees, shrubs (for boundary)• Turf• Outdoor tiles/paving

SITE

SITE

Land Tittle:Beside Block D at JalanTaylor’s 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan

Property Type:Taylor’s Carpark

Land Type:Free hold

Land Status:Open carpark

Coordinates:3°03'52.5"N 101°37'05.4"E

S.WO.T. ANALYSIS

Large open & peaceful site

Nice view and vista

Waterbody nearby solves problem for drainage during rainy condition

STRENGTH

Separated from main building blocks

Unutilized open space

Poor land condition

Provide more natural shading

Provide point of interest at

carpark area

Provide interactive pavilion to attract people

Noise production during construction affects study environment of students

Traffic congestion caused during construction

Pollution of river and car may contaminate the space and cause unpleasant smell

WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITY THREAT

Our vision is to become a creative interactive pavilion where everyone congregate and converge together by offering the community a platform for sharing and exchanging.

The pavilion comprises of various public realm such as the lobby, cafeteria, activity room, collaborative workspace, mini office, event venues, pocket parks and washroom.

It is designed to interlink the campus blocks and the car park area while injecting positive life. The design emphasizes on sustainability and inside out relation

WEEK 1-4

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

DESIGN STATEMENT

CASE STUDY

PROJECT: ROYAL WOLF, AUSTRALIA

ARCHITECTS: BDP

Semi-enclosed market hall Changing of levelCity lifestyle

Offer affordable and flexible conditions for different programs WEEK 1-4

PROJECT: BOXPARK CROYDON, UKARCHITECTS: ROOM 11

Re-used material Naked raw materialPlanted internal courtyard

Clustered typology of modular units encourages interactionWEEK 1-4

CONTAINERS STUDY

20’ Container 40’ Container

Pros

• Eco friendly• Cost efficient• Durable• Easily available• Modular• Recyclable

Cons

• Challenging heat control• Deterioration under a shorter

time compared to concrete buildings

• Requires skilled workers• Health hazard

Problem Solving

• Have green landscaping around and in the building

• Insulate with weather-proof materials and paint

• Hire local skilled workers for construction

• Sandblast off-site

WEEK 1-4

MATERIALITY

INSULATED SHIPPING CONTAINER COMPOSITE TIMBER DECKING

TIMBER FLOORING TILED RESTROOM FLOOR

• Maintain consistent internal temperature• Cost & energy saving as the building • Depend less on mechanical ventilation.

• Easy and clean installation• Requires no painting, no glue and low

maintenance

• Easily sourced locally, reused timber• Warm and welcoming feeling

• Durable• Easy to maintain• Hygienic

WEEK 1-4

DESIGN STRATEGIES

WEEK 1-4

WEEK 5-16

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS

WEEK 5-16

FRONT ELEVATION

REAR ELEVATION

WEEK 5-16

EAST ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

WEEK 5-16

SECTION A-A

SECTION B-B

WEEK 5-16

SPATIAL VISUALIZATION

WEEK 5-16

WEEK 5-16

WEEK 5-16

WEEK 5-16

WEEK 5-16

WEEK 5-16

Category Name % Price(RM)

Operational Expenditure & Cost of Development

Authority 2 10,000.00

Prelimary Cost 4 200,000.00

Contingency Cost 5 30,000.00

Material Wastage Cost 2 10,000.00

GST 6 300,000.00

Total 550,000.00

Category Name % Price(RM)

Construction Cost

Architectural 10 50,000.00

Civil & Structural Engineering 12 60,000.00Mechanical & Electrical Engineering 12 60,000.00

Landscape Architecture 8 40,000.00

Total 210,000.00

Category Name % Price(RM)

Other CostingLabour Cost 2 15,000.00

Sub-contractor cost 4 60,000.00

Total 75,000.00

TOTAL: RM 835,000.00

Schematic Design

Cost estimation from sketch design

WEEK 2

ITEM DESCRIPTION RM

1Building Works 240,960.38

2Architectural 71,293.04

3M&E 82,627.71

4Landscape 276,201.00

5Others 62,248.00

6material and wastage 10,000.00

7Contingency cost 30,000.00

8authority 10,000.00

9Preliminary cost 42,622.84

TOTAL 825,952.97

goods and services tax(GST) 6% 49557.17

TOTAL CARRIED FROM TENDER 875,510.15

Design Development

Summarised Cost Breakdown

WEEK 11-16

14%

46%

12%

16%

12%

OVERALL BUDGET DISTRIBUTION

Architectural Civil and Structural Landscape Mechanical And Electrical others

WEEK 11-16

Cost BreakdownTotal 6% is allocated for consultants

COMPANY PROFESSION PERCENT TOTAL FEE

1NHB STUDIO SDN BHDarchitect & landscape 3% 26265.30

2A.K.K.L CORP. c&s engineer 1.50% 13132.65

3JOHNFENG SDN BHDproject manager 1% 8755.10

4ED KINGDOM CORP. M&e engineer 1% 8755.10

5YX QS CONSULTquantity surveyor 0.50% 4377.55

TOTAL 61,285.71

WEEK 16

THE END