Alex Ordway 60 hours worked

Post on 02-Jan-2016

29 views 1 download

Tags:

description

Alex Ordway 60 hours worked. Attitude Control Subsystem Component Selection and Analysis. Design Drivers. Meeting mission pointing requirements Meet power requirements Meet mass requirements Cost Miscellaneous Factors. Trade Study. Sliding Mass vs. Tip Thruster Configuration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Alex Ordway 60 hours worked

Alex Ordway60 hours worked

Attitude Control Subsystem Component Selection and

Analysis

2

Design Drivers

• Meeting mission pointing requirements

• Meet power requirements

• Meet mass requirements

• Cost

• Miscellaneous Factors

3

Trade Study

• Sliding Mass vs. Tip Thruster Configuration– Idea behind sliding mass

4

Trade Study

• Sliding mass ACS offers– Low power consumption (24 W)– Reasonable mass (40 kg)– Low complexity– Smaller contribution to spacecraft MOI– Limitations

• Unknown torque provided until calculations are made• No roll capability

• Initially decided to use combination of sliding mass and tip thrusters

5

ADCS System Overview

• ADS– Goodrich HD1003 Star Tracker primary– Bradford Aerospace Sun Sensor secondary

• ACS– Four 10 kg sliding masses primary

• Driven by four Empire Magnetics CYVX-U21 motors

– Three Honeywell HR14 reaction wheels secondary

– Six Bradford Aero micro thrusters secondary• Dissipate residual momentum after sail release

6

ADS

• Primary– Decision to use star tracker

• Accuracy• Do not need slew rate afforded by other systems

– Goodrich HD1003 star tracker• 2 arc-sec pitch/yaw accuracy• 3.85 kg• 10 W power draw• -30°C - + 65 °C operational temp. range• $1M

– Not Chosen: Terma Space HE-5AS star tracker• Lower thermal thresholds (-20°C - +40°C)• Greater power draw (15W)

7

ADS

• Secondary– Two Bradford Aerospace sun sensors

• Backup system; performance not as crucial• Sensor located on opposite sides of craft• 0.365 kg each• 0.2 W each• -80°C - +90°C

8

ACS

• Sliding mass system– Why four masses?– FRONTAL PICTURE OF THINGAMAJIG HERE

9

ACS

• Sliding mass system– Four Empire Magnetics CYVX-U21 Step Motors

• Cryo/space rated• 1.5 kg each• 28 W power draw each 200 °C

• $55 K each• 42.4 N-cm torque

10

ACS

• Gear matching- load inertia decreases by the gear ratio squared. Show that this system does not need to be geared.

2

2

2170 (600sec)

20.00389

(10 )(0.00389 )

0.0389

ms

ms

m a

a

F ma kg

F N

11

ACS

• Three Honeywell HR14 reaction wheels– Mission application– Specifications

• 7.5 kg each• 66 W power draw each (at full speed)• -30ºC - +70ºC• 0.2 N-m torque• $200K each• Not selected

– Honeywell HR04– Bradford Aerospace W18

12

ACS

• Six Bradford micro thrusters– 0.4 kg each– 4.5 W power draw each– -30ºC - + 60ºC– 2000 N thrust

– Supplied through N2 tank

13

Attitude Control

• Conclusion– Robust ADCS

• Meets and exceeds mission requirements• Marriage of simplicity and effectiveness• Redundancies against the unexpected