© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University oncourse.iu.edu OneStart puts Web Services Oncourse at...

Post on 12-Jan-2016

213 views 0 download

Transcript of © 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University oncourse.iu.edu OneStart puts Web Services Oncourse at...

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

du

OneStart puts Web Services

Oncourse at Indiana University

Bradley C. Wheeler

Assoc. Dean Teaching & Learning IT & Assoc. Professor of Information Systems

bwheeler@indiana.edu

Office of the Vice President for Information Technology & CIO

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duConsistent Growth

Enterprise Oncourse Growth

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Spr99 Fal99 Spr00 Fal00 Spr01 Fal01 Spr02 Fal02

Semesters

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Courses facultyX2 StudentsX2

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duFall 2002 Semester

Faculty loaded   7,316

Faculty login   4,869

Percent Usage   67%

     

Students loaded   94,570

Student logins   72,825

Percent Usage   77%

All Campuses

IUPUI Faculty 86%Students 87%

Bloomington Faculty 62%Students 77%

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duCMS Requirements are Growing

Library Integration

Special Character SetsMath/Languages/Sciences Sophisticated Assessment

Streaming Multi-media

Direct Manipulation User Interfaces

Textbook Integrationw/ Publishers

OncourseOngoing Maintenance

IMS/SCORM

Self-pacedTutorials

Research/CommitteeSupport

E-Portfolio

How will IU meet these growing requirements for Oncourse in a period of relatively flat resources?

Workflow

Integration/Leveragew/Enterprise Services

Greater Personalization

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duIU Trends…

• Single sign-on to all IU services

• Integrated IU services via OneStart Portal• Greater distributed education by non-students• Growing need for Digital Library integration• e-Portfolio as a means of assessment• Leverage resources essential for economic viability

– shared support,

– shared development tools,

– reducing expensive redundancies in common services

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duQuestions for Course Mgmt Systems

• Integration? • Common authentication, Authorization

• Workflow

• Interoperability?• Student Information System (Vended, Custom)

• Digital Libraries

• Campus Card System (photos)

• Boundary Issues?• Policies… TEACH, IP

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duwww.yodlee.com

A user’s information reports to him/her.

Disparate, unplannedintegration.

Not just paths to other systems or services, but

consolidated, relevant information.

•Subscriptions•Automatic groups

•Delegation

Reasonable Objective?

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duWhere are we today-

Data & ServiceSilos become

Library SIS CMS Schools, etc.

www

…UnbundledWeb Services

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duUnmediated Channels, Workflow

UnbundledServices

Library Registrar CMS Schools

onestart.iu.edu

PortalAuthenticationPersonalization

WorkflowDelegation

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duPost-PC Mobile Computing

Portal

Services connect to the Portal and the Portal connectsto the evolving plethora of wireless, mobile computing devices headed to campus. Connecting each service is infeasible.

Library Registrar CMS Schools

Authn/Authz Security WorkflowComm.Tools

Storage

“Unbundling”

In Touch

Syllabus

Testing

Gradebooks

Calendar

eReservesDigital content

Full Text articles

Federated Searching

Because you can’t sustain pair-wise connections between

n number of systems

Other Functional Apps

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duThe Path for Oncourse

•All Campuses on one system (8 IU Campuses)•All Users on one system (120+ Users)•All Courses in one system (25,000 Courses/Sections)•Single Sign On Solution for Authentication (ADS/CAS)

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duOncourse Profile – SIS Connected

•Dynamic Profiles (Loaded from SIS batch process)•Automated population of course offerings•Automated population of course rosters (including photo ID’s)

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duOncourse Strategy

Rewrite the application using OKI services, J2EE, open sourced

Partnered with U. of Michigan, Stanford, MIT (navigoproject.org)

Identified 7 redundant services in Oncourse for retirement that will be generic to OneStart; economic efficiencies

Oncourse as both a Complete CMS and a set of Web Services for personalization in OneStart

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

du

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duChallenges

Effective integration with Digital Libraries Serving faculty authoring/searching needs Service student access needs

Execution and hitting delivery dates Coordination of multiple universities ePortfolio as a CMS/OKI extension Research collaboration tools “WorkTools”

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duTimelines (In progress!!)

Summer Fall Spring

2002 2003 2004

Summer Fall Spring Fall

•CMS Strategy Review•TLSS Faculty Committee Restructuring•OKI Assessment•Oncourse Staff Realignment

•Developer Training for OKI•Partner Selection•Planning

Oncourse Next GenerationOKI-Compliant

•Initial Unbundling Begins•OKI Compliant Enhancements

Quizzing Toolin production

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

du

OneStart puts Web Services

Oncourse at Indiana University

Bradley C. Wheeler

Assoc. Dean Teaching & Learning IT & Assoc. Professor of Information Systems

bwheeler@indiana.edu

Discussion & Supporting Slides

Office of the Vice President for Information Technology & CIO

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duLessons

• A ‘Build It’approach has served IU well

• Oncourse has succeeded through voluntary adoption – won in the marketplace of ideas

• Leveraging the support infrastructure (Knowlegebase, helpdesk) has paid off

• Quality, quality, quality!!!

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duCampuses Differ

Oncourse Student Adoption by Campus

3%

27%

41%

61%

67%

76%

81%

0%

7%

17%

38%

47%

64%

70%

0% 0%

8%

17%20%

38%

49%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Spr99 Fall99 Spr00 Fall00 Spr01 Fall01 Spr02

Pe

rce

nta

ge

in bl sb nw se ea ko co

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

du

Annual Cost

Measure-ment

Units

Activity Measure-

ment Unit Cost User Satis-

faction

$ 862,246

82,747 Users $ 10.42 94.7%

Activity-based Costs 2001-2002

Total unique users 2001-2002

Source: UITS Report on Cost and Quality of Services, 2001-02

Budgets for IT Services are Flat…

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duOncourse is Outside UIS Economies

UIS Architecture• J2EE

• Oracle

• AIX / Linux

• IBM RS6000 / Intel

Oncourse• Microsoft Active Server

Pages• SQL-Server

• Windows 2000 Server

• Dell Hardware

Oncourse is outside of most peer-university enterprise systems standards

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duNext Steps for Oncourse’s Evolution

• Unbundle Oncourse into web services components for OneStart connectivity

• Migrate to Enterprise Architecture (Java/Linux/Oracle/IBM) and open source

• Partner with lead universities for shared development

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duIMS Global Learning Consortium

• IMS Test and Question Interoperability Specification (QTI)– Common Vocabulary for collaboration– Clearly Defined Assessment, Sections & Items

• Oncourse Test & Survey Tool

• Stand Alone Service

• Redundant Services

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duOpen Knowledge Initiative (OKI)

“OKI Architecture Overview,” OKI White Paper, 22 March 2002, http://web.mit.edu/oki/library/ArchitecturalOverview.pdf

© 2003 The Trustees of Indiana University

onco

urse

.iu.e

duTLSS Advisory Committee

Teaching and Learning Systems Steering

Chairs: Nancy Chism and Ray Smith

Development PrioritiesChair: Brad Wheeler TLSS Members

PoliciesChair: Oner Yurtseven

5-7 members chosen for specified roles

5-7 members chosen for specified roles

ExecutiveTLSS Chair + Subcommittee chairs + AVPs