QNET Direct Selling Company | Lifestyle Wellness Products ... · Orderer: QNET Ltd Dr. Shafi Shaik...

Test report Page 1 of 3

Revision 0

Laboratory for Environmental and Radionuclide Analyses 2871.7 from 16/01/2018

1) not accredited procedure 2) performed by a subcontractor

The analytical results are valid only for the samples which are available by the laboratory. Without permission of the laboratory it is not allowed to duplicate parts of this report.

Accredited by DAkkS according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025. The accreditation is valid for the methods listed on the annex of the accreditation certificate.

Datei: D:\Degering\VKTA\temp\Test report 2871.7 gamma.docx abgeleitet von Vorlage: C:\Users\degering\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Templates\Normal.dotm

Laboratory: VKTA – Strahlenschutz, Analytik & Entsorgung Rossendorf e. V. Labor für Umwelt- und Radionuklidanalytik Bautzner Landstraße 400 01328 Dresden Tel.: 0351 / 260 3489, Fax: 0351 / 260 3190 Orderer: QNET Ltd Dr. Shafi Shaik Units G-L, 21/F, MG Tower 133 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong Kowloon East, Hongkong E-Mail: [email protected] Contract Number: - Contract Date: - Object: Radionuclides in solids Sample number: 1 Sampling: by the orderer Sample input: 11/12/2017 Test period: 11/12/2017 - 16/01/2018

Methods: -spectrometry according to ISO 13356-2015 (MB – 402: 2015-04)

Remarks: The -spectrometry was carried out at the underground laboratory Felsenkeller, Am Eiswurmlager 10, 01189 Dresden.

Approved: Name: Dr. D. Degering

Function: responsible for -spectrometry Signature:

mailto:[email protected]


Revision 0


1 Analytical results

Legend: ai specific activity of the nuclide i 1 * s combined uncertainty for ai s/ai relative combined uncertainty g* detection threshold

For a confidence level of 90% the confidence interval is given as ai 1,645 s. The reference date of the specific activity is the given date of measurement.

2 Assessment according to ISO 13356 The assessment of the analytical results is based on the standard ISO 13356:2015, Chapter 3, Table 1. The radioactivity of the material is defined there as the sum of the specific activities of the radionuclides 238U, 226Ra and 232Th and should be equal or less than 200 Bq/kg. The investigated material of the sample fulfills the requirement of ISO 13356, as shown in the following table.

3 Assessment according to EU297/2011 The artificial radionuclides 131I, 134Cs und 137Cs are evaluated according to the:

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 297/2011 of 25 March 2011 imposing special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station

This strongly conservative basis for evaluation was chosen although the investigated material here is no food. Furthermore, the noticeably stricter test values for baby foods were applied here. Under these conditions the assessment is extremely conservative.

Sample 238U 230Th 226Ra 210Pb 235U 231Pa 227Ac 228Ra 228Th 40K 131I 134Cs 137Cs Detector tm

[Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] Geometry [ks]Date of

measurement

Mass / [kg]

1 ai < 1,9 < 21 0,83 < 1,9 < 1,9 < 4,1 < 0,90 0,93 0,65 30 < 0,14 < 0,14 < 0,17 GMX 3 65

Amezcua Biodisc 3 V.2- 1* s 0,18 0,28 0,11 4 70D 14 January 2018

s/ai 22% 30% 17% 14% 0,114

g* 0,97 11 0,18 0,97 0,97 2,0 0,45 0,34 0,13 1,2 0,072 0,070 0,085 Degering

Sample 238U 226Ra 232Th SumRequired

value

Actual sum/

required

[Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] -

max(228Ra, 228Th)

1

Amezcua Biodisc 3 V.2-

1,9 0,8 0,9 3,7 < 200 1,8%


Revision 0


The investigated material of the sample fulfills the requirements of EU 297/2011, as shown in the following table. It can thus be used without restrictions.

---- End of the report ----

Sample

[Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg] [Bq/kg]

Analytical value Test value Analytical value Test value Analytical value Test value

1

Amezcua Biodisc 3 V.2-

< 0,17 370 0,05%< 0,14 150 0,10% < 0,14 370 0,04%

131I

Exh

au

sti

on

of

test

valu

e

134Cs

Exh

au

sti

on

of

test

valu

e

137Cs

Exh

au

sti

on

of

test

valu

e

Test Protocol No. 18/03 Product under Test: BioDisc 3.3

Berlin 16.03.2018

1

European EPC(GDV)-CentreSiegfriedstraße 204 //10365 BerlinTelephone 0049 - 30 - 63 90 87 98 www.elektrophotonik-berlin.de

Test Insitute Institute of Electrophotonic Siegfriedstrasse 204 10365 Berlin // Germany Client QNET LTD. Units G-L, 21/F MG Tower 133 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong Kowloon East HK Manufacturer QNET LTD. Units G-L, 21/F MG Tower 133 Hoi Bun Road, Kwun Tong Kowloon East HK Test Sample Model Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 Quantity 1 Condition new

Photograph

Test Method Measurement of the human body, water and space states with the EPC Camera and the EPC “ECOTESTER”(production: Biotechprogress, Ltd., Russia). All the tests were carried out double blind with placebo.

Test Water tap water

Test Location rooms of the test institute

Test Result The product has an energetically influence on Human Body, water and space states.

Established and released on 16.03.2018.

2

Content

1.0 Test Equipment ____________________________________________4

2.0 Test of the influence of Amezcua BioDisc3.3 on human body state.___________________________________________4

2.1 Measurement Procedure_________________________________ 42.2 Subjects______________________________________________ 5

2.3 Results _______________________________________________6 2.3.1.0 Test group_______________________________________________6

2.3.1.1 Influence on Area(wf) _____________________________________ 6

2.3.1.2 Influence on Area(f)_______________________________________7 2.3.1.3 Energy of glowing (wf)______________________________________8 2.3.1.4 Energy of glowing(f)______________________________________92.3.1.5 Activation coefficient(stress level)____________________________10 2.3.2.0 Placebo group____________________________________________112.3.2.1 Placebo Area of glowing(wf) ________________________________11

2.3.2.2 Placebo Area of glowing(f) _________________________________12 2.3.2.3 Placebo Energy (wf) _______________________________________13 2.3.2.4 Placebo Energy (f) ________________________________________14 2.3.2.5 Activation coefficient(stress level)____________________________15

3.0 Test of Influence of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 on water state_____________16 3.1Measurements procedure and photographs________________________ 16 3.2 Results __________________________________________________ 17

4.0 Test of the Influence of Amezcua BioDisc3.3 on Space_____________184.1 Measurement Procedure___________________________ 184.2 Results _________________________________________18

5,0 Conclusion ________________________________________________19

3

1.0. Test Equipment EPC – Camera

This scientific device consist of hardware and software for the direct Computer registration and analysis of glow energy of different objects under the influences of pulse EM -field, the human energy and stress states. The recorded images, EPC – Grammes, are created by a unique patented optical system and CCD camera in daylight condition with real – time processing.(fig1)

EPC – ECOTESTER

The ECOTESTER is intended for evaluation of the state of the environment. The device gives the possibility to carry out ecological monitoring.

Figure 1. EPC Devices

Camera ECOTESTER “Sputnik”

2.0 Test of the influence of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 on human body state.2.1 Measurement Procedure The product was tested on 10 apparently healthy persons (subjects) of different age and gender. Every measurement was attended with a placebo. The measured subject and the operator of EPC-Camera did not know about it. During the tests the subjects wore the product in their pant pockets close to the body. It ere measured the EPC- Grammes with and without filter. The changes of the EPC-Parameters "integral glow area" , “energy of glowing” and "activation coefficient" were analyzed.

The "integral glow area", “energy of glowing” directly correlates with the human body bio energy. The positive influence of the test product on the human body state is represented in the increasing of the bio energy for healthy tired person with stress. On healthy relaxed person with optimal initial bio energy the energy products have a neglected weak influence on the quantity, but a positive influence on the quality of the energy: left-right symmetry and homogeneity of glowing. In case of

4

an abnormal high energy, for example inflammatory, the products reduce the body energy in the direction of optimal body energy.

The EPC-Parameter "activation coefficient" correlates with the physiological stress of person. The positively harmonizing influence of the test product is represented in the decreasing of stress level ("activation coefficient") for healthy person and increasing of the "activation coefficient" for the people with inflammatory state.

2.2 Subjects

4 subjects male 26 to 62 years old

6 subjects female 33 to 59 years old

1 female 552 male 623 female 334 female 365 male 306 female 397 male 268 female 379 male 3110 female 59

5

2.3.0 Results2.3.1 Test group2.3.1.1 Influence on Area of glowing(without filter)The parameter “Area” rose for 10 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30and 60 minutes.Dagram 1 Area of glowing (without filter)

Data Table of Diagram

Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 11017 11954 116842 11773 11870 119563 9305 9803 105814 10479 10888 110395 9283 10199 102456 10503 10936 105857 6732 9562 92318 9407 10536 106599 10673 11054 1091710 104473 11127 11554

Average in the test grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 9964 10793 10845 8,8 %

6

Test group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Area of glowing(wf)

6000

70008000

900010000

1100012000

13000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Area

(pix

)

0 m in. 30 m in. 60 m in.

2.3.1.2 Influence on Area of glowing(with filter)

The parameter “Area” rose for 7 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30and 60 minutes.

Diagram2 Area of glowing (with filter)

Data table of Diagram 2 Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 12371 12752 128382 13859 14069 137493 12126 12360 121004 12127 12421 126995 11766 12907 128796 12499 12625 123067 12236 12213 130918 11843 12226 124399 12509 12719 1228710 12410 12640 12486

Average in the test grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 12475 12693 12687 1,7 %

7

Test group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Area of glowing(f)

11500

12000

12500

13000

13500

14000

14500

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Area

(pix

)

0 min. 30 min. 60 min.

2.3.1.3 Influence on Energy of glowing(wf)

The parameter “Energy(wf)” rose for 10 of 10 subjects during theinfluence of 30 and 60 minutes

Diagram 3. Energy(wf)

Data table of Diagram 3 Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 1,00 1,11 1,102 1,00 1,02 1,033 1,00 1,10 1,254 1,00 1,07 1,055 1,00 1,16 1,176 1,00 1,11 1,017 1,00 1,28 1,268 1,00 1,20 1,269 1,00 1,09 1,1310 1,00 1,07 1,12

Average in the test grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 1,0 1,121 1,138 13,8 %

8

Test group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Norm energy of glowing(wf)

0,9

1

1,1

1,2

1,3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Norm

ene

rgy

0 m in. 30 m in. 60 m in.

2.3.1.4 Influence on Energy of glowing(f)

The parameter “Energy(f)” rose or remained nearly the same for 7 of 10 or subjects during theinfluence of 30 and 60 minutes

Diagram 4. Energy(f)

Data table of Diagram 4

Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 1,00 1,05 1,022 1,00 1,00 0,983 1,00 1,02 1,014 1,00 1,01 1,045 1,00 1,03 1,056 1,00 0,98 0,987 1,00 1,03 1,118 1,00 1,04 1,069 1,00 0,98 0,9910 1,00 1,00 1,00

Average in the test grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 1,0 1,014 1,024 2,4 %

9

Test group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Norm energy of glowing(f)

0,95

1

1,05

1,1

1,15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Norm

ene

rgy


2.3.1.5 Influence on Activation coefficient(stress level)The parameter “Activation coefficient” reduces or remained nearly the same for 10 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30 and 60 minutes.

Diagram 5. Activation coefficient


Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 2,16 1,3 1,552 2,35 2,22 1,643 4,44 3,35 2,374 2,34 2,12 2,225 5,4 3,84 3,626 3,26 2,,2 2,447 7,27 4,35 5,338 3,34 2,21 2,289 2,47 2,31 2,4910 2,26 2,47 1,66

Average in the test grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 3,529 2,647 2,56 - 27,5 %

10

Test group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Activation coefficient(s tress level)

012345678

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Activ

. coe

ff.

0 min. 30 m in. 60 m in.

2.3.2.0 Placebo group2.3.2.1 Influence of Placebo on Area of glowing(wf)

The parameter “Area” reduces or remained nearly the same for 6 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30 and 60 minutes.

Diagram 6. Placebo Area of glowing(wf)


Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 10994 10887 110172 11681 11488 11773

3 9595 8534 93054 10979 9187 104795 9885 9595 92836 9777 9139 104007 8899 7963 67328 8937 10111 94079 10885 11492 1067310 10373 10149 10473

Average in the placebo grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 10200 9854 9954 - 2,4 %

11

Placebo group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Area of glowing(wf).

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Are

a(pi

x)


2.3.2.2 Influence of Placebo on Area of glowing(f)

The parameter “Area” reduces for 5 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30 and 60 minutes.

Diagram 7. Placebo Area of glowing(f)


Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 11947 12414 123712 14427 14058 138593 11799 11700 121264 12925 12078 121275 12567 12474 127666 12100 12051 124997 12385 12840 122368 11468 11751 118439 12768 12668 1250910 11915 12310 12410

Average in the placebo grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 12430 12434 12475 0,36 %

12

Pacebol group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Area of glowing(f)

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

15000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Are

a(pi

x)


2.3.2.3 Placebo Energy of glowing(wf)

The parameter “Norm energy(wf)” reduces or remained nearly the same for 8 of 10 subjects during the influence of 30 and 60 minutes

Diagram 8. Energy(wf)



Average in the placebo grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 1,0 0,916 0,967 - 3,30 %

13

Placebo group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Norm energy of glowing(wf)

0,75

0,8

0,85

0,9

0,95

1

1,05

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Nor

m e

nerg

y


2.3.2.4 Placebo Energy of glowing(f) The parameter “Energy(f)” reduces or remained nearly the same for 5 of 10 subjects during theinfluence of 30 and 60 minutes

Diagram 9. Energy(f)

Data table of Diagram 9Subjects 0 min. 30 min. 60 min.1 1,0 1,04 1,042 1,0 0,99 1,013 1,0 0,98 1,014 1,0 0,95 0,975 1,0 1,0 1,016 1,0 0,98 1,037 1,0 0,98 0,918 1,0 1,03 1,059 1,0 0,97 0,9810 1,0 1,0 1,01

Average in the placebo group

time of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 1,0 0,992 1,002 0,20 %

14

Placebo Group Amezcua BioDisc 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Norm energy of glowing(f)

0,9

0,95

1

1,05

1,1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Norm

ene

rgy


2.3.2.5 Influence on Activation coefficient(Stress level) in placebo group

The parameter “Activation coefficient” rose or for 5 of 10 subjects duringthe influence of 30 and 60 minutes.

Diagram 10. Activation coefficient



Average in the placebo grouptime of influence 0min 30min 60min differenceAverage in the group 3,185 3,603 3,529 10,80%

15

Placebo group Amezcua BD 3.3. EPC(GDV) - Activation coefficient(stress level)

012345678

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

subjects

Activ

.coe

ff.


3.0 Test of the influence of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 on water states3.1 Measurement Procedure and Photographs of the Procedure

For the test was used tap water. Water was filled in two clean glasses and stands for two hourswithout influence on the laboratory table. The glasses was covered with a sheet of paper.For the estimation of changing of water states under the influence of the Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 it was measured the "glowing" of a test or placebo water drop filled in syringe. The measurement was carried out with EPC- Camera (Fig. 3).The EPC- parameter of measurement was "Energy of glowing". The energizing and harmonizinginfluence responses to the increasing of this parameter.In the beginning the initial water state was measured from both glasses. Then the test product wasplaced in its original package under one glass and a package without a product was placedunder the placebo water glass. (Fig. 2). The measurements were repeated after 30min,60min and120min of influences. It was noted the average value(4x40=160 pulse) of four measurements forone point of water state. All data of test water was normalized to initial states of test water and allplacebo data to initial state of placebo. It was calculated the average after 4 tests.

Figure 2. Water test// BioDisc 3.3 Figure 3. Water test// Test procedure

BioDisc 3.3 was placed in a box under 1- EPC Camera, 2- attachment for tests of fluids, a glass 3 – laptop

16

3.2 ResultsThe results of the changing of EPC — norm. parameter "Energy of glowing" for BioDisc 3.3 influenced water are shown on diagram 11.

Diagram 11: Results of water measurements for test and placebo - average after 4 test. Every test results is the average of 4(4x40=160 pulse) measurements norm. data of the energy of water drop glowing.

Data table of Diagram 11______________________________________________________________________ time of influences 0min 30min 60min 120min______________________________________________________________________ test water 1 1,060 1,158 1,132 placebo water 1 1,000 1,085 1,061______________________________________________________________________ difference 0 6,0% 6,73% 6,70%______________________________________________________________________

Difference between test and placebo after 120min of BioDisc 3.3 influences: 6,70%

17

Influence of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 on water state in time. EPC(GDV) - Norm energy of water drop glowing

0,95

1

1,05

1,1

1,15

1,2

0min 30min 60min 120min

time

Nor

m e

nerg

y

placebo test

4.0 Test of the Influence of Amezcua BioDisc3.3 on Space4.1 Measurement ProcedureFor the measurement of the influences of the Amezcua BioDisc3.3 on space states were used theEPC-ECOTESTER with sensor –antenna “Sputnik” (Fig. 4). The signal from the antenna correlateswith the state of spaces around the antenna and was documented as the EPC-parameter "Energy of glowing" of the metal cylinder.

Figure 4

If the space around the antenna is in a good harmonically state –the signal of antenna is higher. Thestates of space is in a permanent changing because of different influences: day, month and yeardynamic, the influence of different electromagnetic fields, geoactive zones, etc.The test took place in the laboratory room of the institute. During the tests the positions of thedevices, antenna and the influence product were always the same. The test product was placed in adistance of 30cm from the antenna after 60min. It was carried out simultaneously test in two roomswith one device in each room. One room – placebo measurements, another – test.Nobody was in therooms during the influences. Were measured and registered one pulse/min 5 hour long. Werecalculate the the average signal of 60 pulse every hour of measurements. The signal normed to firsthour average value was comparison.

4.2ResultsThe normalized antenna signal data average after 4 testsDiagram 12

18

Influence of BioDisc 3.3 on space state. EPC(GDV) EcoTester - antenna norm signal(average after 4 test)

0,96

0,98

1

1,02

1,04

1,06

0h 1h 2h 3h 4htime

Norm

ant

enna

sig

nal

test placebo

Data table of Diagram 11_____________________________________________________________time of influences 0min 60min 120min 180min 240min_____________________________________________________________

test 1 1,024 1,048 1,055 1,051_____________________________________________________________ placebo 1 0,989 0,997 0,972 0,974_____________________________________________________________

Difference 1 3,5% 5,1% 8,5% 7,9%______________________________________________________________

After 4 hours of Amezcua BioDisc 3.3 influences on space difference between test signal and placebo average after four tests – 7,9%

===================================================================5. Conclusion: differences between test and placebo

Influence on human - average in the group:1. Area(wf) ---- 11,2%2. Area(f) ---- 1,3%3. Energy(wf) — 17,1%4. Energy (f) ----- 2,2%5. Stress ------ 38,3%Influence water: after 120 min – 6,7%Influence space: after 4 hours -- 7,9%============================================

19

QNET Direct Selling Company | Lifestyle Wellness Products ... · Orderer: QNET Ltd Dr. Shafi Shaik...

Documents

Transcript of QNET Direct Selling Company | Lifestyle Wellness Products ... · Orderer: QNET Ltd Dr. Shafi Shaik...