www.icddrb.org
Development of a shared latrine cleanliness and maintenance intervention for low-income
urban communities in Dhaka, BangladeshFarzana Yeasmin
Research InvestigatorWASH Research Group
icddr,b
26 October Water and Health Conference
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 2015
Roles of research partners This study is part of a research programme initiated by WSUP
and funded by DFID icddr,b
o Develop and evaluate the behavior change intervention package to improve shared sanitation in Dhaka
o Identify and disseminate lessons relevant for other low income urban settings
WSUPo Identified the research question, and engaged different
stakeholders in urban sanitationo Financially supported the projecto Provided technical feedback on the intervention package
2
Background
• Nearly 15 million of Bangladesh’s inhabitants live in Dhaka of whom - approximately six million reside in urban slums and - 4.3 million use communal latrines
• Communal latrines are considered financially and technically viable option in Dhaka’s 5,000 slums
3
Background• Improper maintenance of communal latrines,
including safe and timely removal and disposal of fecal sludge, spreads diarrheal pathogens in the surrounding communities
• Proper maintenance of communal latrines is complicated:- Lack of social cohesion- Technical problem- Poor governance
4
Objective
To develop and pilot a behavior change intervention that addresses the obstacles affecting communal latrine maintenance in urban Dhaka
5
Study sites and duration• Nov 2013 to Dec 2014• Two low-income
communitieso International NGO
piloting toilet improvement interventions
o NGO-trained fecal sludge remover identified problematic toilet blockages
6
Study design Phase-1:
Identifying the Barriers to Fecal Sludge Management
Phase-2: Selecting and Pre-Testing the Intervention
Phase-3: Pilot test and assess the acceptability and
feasibility of the intervention package
Phase 1: Identifying the Barriers to Fecal Sludge Management
• Objectives: o To identify obstacles to communal latrine cleanliness
and functionalityo To explore waste disposal practices as they relate to
communal latrine use• Participants: o Fecal sludge removal operators (5)o Adult toilet users (5) proximal to blocked toilets who
are caregivers of children under 2• Methods: In-depth interviews
8
Phase 1 Findings• Two important barriers
for communal latrine cleanliness:
- Inappropriate trash
disposal
- Limited/inconsistent water availability
Phase 2: Selecting and Pre-Testing the Intervention• Objectives: o To develop and elicit community feedback on
behavior change communicationso To select waste bin and water storage hardware for
pilot testing• Participants: residents, landlords, and children• Methods: focus group discussions
70L plastic reservoir and 4L flushing bucket
Two types of 12L plastic waste bin
Selected intervention for solid waste disposal and water availability
11
Materials to promote behavior change: Proper waste disposal
Do not dispose waste in the latrine Dispose waste into the waste bucket
12
Materials to promote behavior change: Cleaning and flushing
We will take a bucket of water from reservoir bucket for flushing
We will clean latrine after defecation by pouring water into the latrine
13
Phase 3: Pilot test
• Objective: To assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention package
• Participants: Residents of two urban slums
14
Phase 3: Pilot test intervention-waste disposal
A. 12-liter bin for waste disposal
B. Signs indicating appropriate waste disposal behaviors
15
Phase 3: Pilot test intervention-flushing
A. Signs indicating appropriate flushing behaviors
B. Small, 4-liter bucket for flushing
C. Large water storage reservoir with scoop inside
16
Phase 3:Intervention pilot assessment
Spot checks of waste bins & water storage hardware: daily for 2 weeks
Method/Tools Participants N
Indepth Interview
Toilet users 32
Bin cleaners, 6Landlords 6Care givers of children who use potty 4
Focus group discussion
Adult female toilet users 10
Key informant interview
Implementers of project promoting child potty use
2
Phase 3 Findings-benefits
• Residents refilled the water reservoir • Designated cleaners to empty waste bins• Reduced toilet blockage and odor
“We would hold a cloth over our nose to use the latrine. Sometimes we fainted in the latrine. After the construction of the latrine it was in this bad condition. Now you have given us materials and the latrine remains much better than before.” (Male resident, water scarcity area)
• Using a potty was easy and more convenient than cleaning up feces from the floor
18
Phase 3: Findings-barriers
• Disgust and menstrual management
“Although this bin has a lid, whenever we open it, I feel disgust. This should be a confidential matter as it is an embarrassing matter.” (Male resident, 31 years old)
• Delayed bin emptying by volunteers• Male residents urinate on the latrine floor and
walls creating a bad odor• Children made a mess while defecating
19
Addressing barriers• Additional signs for parents and male residents• Latrines remained clean because of these
additional messages
Final intervention hardwareo Waste bin design selected on the basis of most
convenient to maintaino Water storage set with flushing bucket and scoop
21
Final Intervention messages
Final intervention activities• Behavior change communication messages delivered by
community health promoters• Interpersonal communication sessions with waste bin
emptiers, landlords and residents• Group meetings with fecal
sludge emptiers• A cue card describing the
benefits of purchasing and using a potty to encourage caregivers
Conclusion
• Community input and iterative intervention piloting identified:o Key audiences o Enabling low-cost hardware and
communication messages o Methods to improve shared toilet
functionality and cleanliness
24
www.icddrb.org
Study teamIcddr,b:Leanne UnicombFarzana BegumFosiul NizameMahbub-Ul AlamNotan ChandraDalia YeasminKhubair Hossain Abdullah-Al Masud
25
For more information: [email protected]
Stanford University:Stephen Luby
WSUP:Guy NormanAnita LaydenAbdus ShaheenHabibur RahmanNasrin Akter
Johns Hopkins University:Peter WinchRonald Saxton
Acknowledgement: Study participants; Diana DiazGranados; Astrid Dier, Dr. Mahbubur Rahman
www.icddrb.org
Our Donor
26
Top Related