Download - Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Transcript
Page 1: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

3D Printing State of the Art: IndustrialJohn Hornick

April 2016

Page 2: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

What Is It?

Page 3: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

3

What Is It? Not Yoda head

Page 4: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

4

What Is It? Not Yoda head

Page 5: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

The Name Game

Page 6: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

6

The Name Game AKA:

– 3D printing– Additive Manufacturing

(AM)– Direct Digital Manufacturing– Rapid prototyping

Page 7: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

7

The Name Game

3D Printing v. AM

Page 8: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

8

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive

Page 9: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

9

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive– old v. new

Page 10: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

10

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive– old v. new– injection molding, casting, weaving

Page 11: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

11

The Name Game

Subtractive v. Additive– old v. new– injection molding, casting, weaving

old and additive

Page 12: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

12

The Name Game 3D printing/AM v. “traditional”

Page 13: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

13

The Name Game 3D printing/AM v. “traditional”

Page 14: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

14

The Name Game

SLA SLS

DMLSDLP

FFFFDM

Page 15: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

15

The Name GameBinder jettingDirected energy depositionMaterial extrusionMaterial jettingPowder bed fusionSheet laminationVat photopolymerization

Page 16: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

3DP Today

Page 17: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

17

3DP Today

Price Range:

ASP:

Industrial Base:

Page 18: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

18

3DP Today

Price Range: $5K to $5M

ASP:

Industrial Base:

Page 19: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

19

3DP Today

Price Range: $5K to $2M

ASP: $87K ($90K)Industrial Base:

Page 20: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

20

3DP Today

Price Range: $5K to $2M

ASP: $87K ($90K)

Industrial Base: ~80K

Page 21: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

21

3DP Today

Page 22: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Binder Jetting

Page 23: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

23

Binder Jetting aka Digital Part Materialization

Page 24: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

24

Binder Jetting

Materials: – polymer, metal, glass, sand

Post-processing: curing, sintering, infiltration

Color (in plastic)

Page 25: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

25

Binder Jetting: Plastics

3D Systems ProJet (US)

acrylate powder infiltrated with cyanoacrylate full color parts $16K to $114K

Page 26: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

26

Binder Jetting: Plastics

Voxeljet (Germany) continuous build acrylic polymer, sand

room temperature cure (no heat distortion) $150K to $1.8 million

Page 27: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

27

Binder Jetting: Metals

ExOne (US) 2.5 x 1.6 x 1.3 ft. Bronze, Inconel, iron, stainless steel, tungsten, glass, sand Post-processing: Metal parts:

– sintered – binder burned out– infiltrated with bronze

$145K to $1.6 million

Page 28: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

28

Binder Jetting: Metals Hoganas (Sweden)

– Small– Precise

Page 29: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

29

Binder Jetting: Licenses Developed by MIT (“3D Printing”)

– Licensed to: ExOne Z Corp.

–(acquired by 3D Systems)

– Sublicensed: 3D Systems to Voxeljet

Page 30: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Directed Energy Deposition

Page 31: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

31

Directed Energy Deposition aka:

–Blown Powder AM–Laser Cladding

–$350K to $1.5M

Page 32: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

32

Directed Energy Deposition Optomec (US)

– Laser Engineered Netshaping (LENS) ≤ 3 x 5 x 3 ft. ≤ 1 kW

Page 33: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

33

Directed Energy Deposition LENS

– Multi-metals simultaneously graded materials/parts on the fly

– Multi-axis head– Unlimited substrates

Page 34: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

34

Directed Energy Deposition– Sciaky (US)

Electron beam (EBAM) Wire feedstock 9 x 4 x 5 ft.

Titanium, tantalum, Inconel, SS, Cobalt alloys, Nickel alloys, copper nickel alloys

Fast Very rough parts

Page 35: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

35

Directed Energy Deposition– Accufusion “Laser

Consolidation”– AM3D– BeAM (Irepa Laser)

“EasyCLAD”– eFesto “Laser

Cladding”

– Honeywell Aerospace “Ion Fusion Formation”

– INSSTek– NASA/Penn State

Radiant Deposition– Trumpf TruLaser– Xi’an Bright Laser

Technologies (China)

Page 36: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

36

Hybrids DMG Mori Sieki

Germany/Japan

– Laser Deposition Welding DED 5-axis mill 25” x 25” x 22” 2 kW

Page 37: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

37

Hybrids Yamazaki Mazak

DED

Milling

Interchangeable tool heads

Page 38: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

38

New on the Block Toshiba:

– 2017– Laser Metal Deposition– 10x PBF– large parts– 110cc/hr

Page 39: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Material Extrusion

Page 40: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

40

Material Extrusion aka:

– Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

– Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)

Page 41: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

41

Material Extrusion

Post-processing: removal of supports, surface finishing

Prototypes, simple plastic parts Most-used process

Page 42: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

42

Material Extrusion Thermoplastics

– ABS– PLA– Polycarbonate– PC/ABS blend– Helian/Eastman

ColorFabb XT– ULTEM

Page 43: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

43

Material Extrusion Consumer:

– 2009: watershed– ~300– $500 to $5000

Page 44: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

44

Material Extrusion Stratasys/Objet (US/Israel)

– Filament spools ABS PLA Support material

– $9500 to $500K

Page 45: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

45

Material Extrusion Arburg (Germany) “Freeformer”

– Stationery nozzle– 3/5 axis– Deposits droplets at high speed

Similar to BPM– Thermoplastic pellets

Page 46: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Material Jetting

Page 47: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

47

Material Jetting Types:

– Aerosol Jet/Direct write– Cold Spray– Ballistic Particle Manufacturing (BPM)– Polyjet

Page 48: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

48

Material Jetting

Aerosol Jet/Direct Write

2.5D

Page 49: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

49

Material Jetting

Post-processing: heat or chemical treatment

Unlimited:

substrates

shapes

Circuitry

Extreme precision

$200K to $500K

Page 50: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

50

Material Jetting Direct Write companies:

– Optomec (US) Aerosol Jet– Lawrence Livermore (US)– nScrypt (US)– CamTek (Israel)– Nano Dimension (Israel)– Neotech (Germany)– XJet “Nano Metal Jetting” (Israel)– Argentum (US)

Page 51: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

51

Material Jetting Cold Spray

– CSIRO

– Flexible Robotic Environments– Trinity College

Page 52: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

52

Material Jetting Ballistic Particle Manufacturing (BPM)

– Build method: inkjet-like nozzle fires thermoplastic at high speed solidified into desired shape

– Applns: prototyping

Page 53: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

53

Material Jetting Companies:

– BPM, South Carolina (defunct)– Incremental Fabrication Technologies

(defunct?) metal particles

– Similar to: cold spray Arburg Freeformer

Page 54: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

54

Hybrids Hermle MPA 40

– Thermal metal spray 3X

– 5 axis CNC– Intermediate milling– Alloys on the fly

Page 55: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

55

Material Jetting Polyjet

Page 56: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

56

Material Jetting– Materials: photopolymers, casting materials,

support– Multi and graded materials on the fly

– Post-processing: remove supports, extra powder– Finished parts

Page 57: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

57

Material Jetting Multi-jet Modeling

– Multi materials in different proportions Some ProJet machines (5500X)

– $60K to $225K

Page 58: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

58

Material Jetting

J750–Digital materials–6 different resins–360,000 colors–2X

Page 59: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Powder Bed Fusion

Page 60: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

60

Powder Bed Fusion

Page 61: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

61

Powder Bed Fusion aka Laser Melting

– Direct Metal Printing (DMP) (3D Systems/Phenix, U.S.)

– Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) (EOS, Germany)

– Metal Laser Melting (MLM) (Renishaw (UK)) Licensed by EOS for U.S.

– Selective Laser Melting (SLM)(SLM Solutions, Germany) Licensed by EOS for U.S.

– Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) (Fonon, US)

– laserCUSING (Concept Laser, Germany)

Page 62: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

62

Powder Bed Fusion Other companies:

– Aspect (Japan)– Beijing Longyuan (China)– Blueprinter (Denmark)

(Selective Heat Sintering)– Hunan Farsoon (China)– Realizer (Germany)

(precious metals)– RPM Innovations (US)– Shaanxi Hengtong (China)

– Sisma Spa (Italy)– Trumpf (Germany)– Wuhan Binhu/Huake

(China)– Xi’an Bright Laser

Technologies (China)

Price: $160K to $5.0 million

Page 63: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

63

Powder Bed Fusion Laser Melting

– Lasers: 400 w to 1 kW– Materials: aluminum, copper, nickel, and titanium

alloys, carbides, SS, tool steels– Post Processing: Heat treating, finishing– Structural finished parts– Complex geometries– Finer finish than EBM

Page 64: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

64

Powder Bed Fusion Electron Beam Melting (EBM)

– Arcam (Sweden)– same as LM,

but with electron beam– BV: 14” x 14” x 15”– Laser: 3 kW

Page 65: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

65

Powder Bed Fusion Electron Beam Melting (EBM)

– Materials: Titanium (supported by Arcam)– Faster than laser– Less residual stress than LM– Applns:

structural finished parts, complex geometries– aerospace parts, orthopedic implants

less refined than LM

Page 66: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

66

Hybrids Matsuura (Japan)

– Powder Bed Fusion – CNC Mill

Mills every ten layers– 400W ytterbium fiber laser– $1 million

OPM Laboratory (Japan) PBF + CNC mill

Page 67: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

67

Powder Bed Fusion Sintratec

– Switzerland– Nylon– €5K

Page 68: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

68

Powder Bed Fusion

20:1

25%

Page 69: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

69

Powder Bed Fusion rtt

Page 70: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

70

Powder Bed Fusion

Page 72: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

72

Powder Bed Fusion

Page 73: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

73

Powder Bed Fusion

http://www.flyingmachine.com.au/studio/

Page 74: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

74

Powder Bed Fusion

http://www.flyingmachine.com.au/studio/

Page 75: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

75

Powder Bed Fusion

http://www.flyingmachine.com.au/studio/

Page 76: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Sheet Lamination

Page 77: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

77

Sheet Lamination Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM)

–MCor Technologies (Ireland) Full color models $36K to $47K

Page 78: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

78

Sheet Lamination Ultrasonic Lamination (UL)

–Fabrisonic Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM) 72” x 72” x 36” Multi-axis machining Embedded sensors Joining dissimilar

materials

Page 79: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Vat Photopolymerization

Page 80: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

80

Vat Photopolymerization

1980s

Page 81: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

81

Vat Photopolymerization

Page 82: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

82

Vat Photopolymerization Digital Light Processing (DLP)

Envisiontec (Germany) DWS, Lithoz (Ceramic-filled polymer),

Asiga, Rapid Shape Formlabs, Autodesk EMBER, B9,

DWS XFab

Stereolithography (SLA) 3D Systems Lawrence Livermore

– Micro-stereolithography» Ultra-stiff, lightweight parts

Page 83: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

83

VPP for $86K

Page 84: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

84

Vat Photopolymerization

Smooth-finish parts, jewelry molds, prototypes

$5K to $600K

Pauline/3D Varius

Page 85: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Game Changers Among Game Changers

Page 86: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

86

BAAM

ORNLLocal MotorsCincinnati Inc.

Page 87: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

87

BAAM

ORNLUTenn

Page 88: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

88

Voxel8

Page 89: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

89

CBAM Process Overview

Load CAD slices into

printer and print bitmap of layer on fiber sheet

Remove dry

polymer powder

Feed fiber sheet into

inkjet printer

Stack sheets, heat, and

compress stack to final part

height

Remove un-bonded portions of fiber sheets to net final part

Deposit polymer powder

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Page 90: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

90

Impossible Objects CBAM

– Functional parts– ≤10x faster/stronger– Strength to weight

Page 91: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

91

Carbon Continuous Liquid Interface Production (CLIP)

Page 92: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

92

Figure 4 Platform

Page 93: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

93

Page 94: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

94

High Speed Sintering/FACTUM

Page 95: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

95

High Speed Sintering/FACTUM

Page 96: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

96

s

Page 97: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

97

Who Else Wants In? New resin-based lamination process

– Fast– Precise

Rapid– Prototyping– Manufacturing

Page 98: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

98

Who Else Wants In?

November 2015:

PBF (polymers)$50-$150K ???

Page 99: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Patent Landscape

Page 100: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

100

Patent Landscape USA 60%

Page 101: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

101

Patent Landscape Top issuing: USA 60%

– 2002 to 2014: 12,000

Page 102: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

102

Patent Landscape Top issuing: USA 60%

– 2002 to 2014: 12,000

– Pending: ~4000– Issued: ~8000

Page 103: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

103

Patent Landscape Top issuing: USA 60%

Expiring: – 2003 to 2014: (225)– 2013 to 2014: ~16

Page 104: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

104

Patent Landscape

Patents

Applns

Page 105: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

105

Patents Issued 1991 to Early 2014

3D Systems

Univ. of Texas

Electro Optical Systems

Objet

Nanotek

MakerBot

BPM Technology

United Technologies

Z Corporation

Panasonic

VoxelJet

0 50 100 150 200 250201

101616

5785

2519

1324

852

81314

2615

408

2166

# of Patents

# of Patents

Page 106: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

The Players

Page 107: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

107

3D Systems, DTM, & Z Corp US DDD 2001: acquired DTM Corporation 2012: acquired Z Corporation BJ, ME, MJ, PBF, VPP

Page 108: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

108

Stratasys/Objet Israel (US) SSYS 2012:Merged with Objet 2013:Acquired Makerbot ME, MJ

Page 109: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

109

Stratasys & MakerBot Consumer/prosumer/RP printers Lower cost machines (~$2000) 2013: acquired by Stratasys in $403M stock deal

Page 110: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

110

Arcam Sweden AMAVF PBF (Electron Beam)

– Focus: orthopedic implants and aerospace

Page 111: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

111

Concept Laser Germany PBF

– Laser CUSING

Page 112: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

112

Electro Optical Systems Germany PBF

Page 113: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

113

EnvisionTEC Germany VPP

jewelry, hearing aid, dental, consumer, auto manufacturing, and design

Page 114: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

114

ExOne US XONE Binder Jet

Page 115: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

115

HP US HPQ Game changer among game changers Multi Jet fusion

Page 116: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

116

Optomec US DED, MJ

LENS Aerosol Jet

2.5D/parts/repair

Page 117: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

117

Voxeljet Germany VJET Binder Jet Big printers

Page 118: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

118

Companies

“Game changing technology” Acquired Morris Technologies

Page 119: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

119

Companies

“Game changing technology” Acquired Morris Technologies

Page 120: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

120

Companies

“Game changing technology” Acquired Morris Technologies

Silverbrook Technologies (Australia)– ≥ 40 patents (BPM)

Page 121: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

121

Colleges and Universities USC: ≥ 26 patents (5)

Page 122: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

122

Colleges and Universities USC: ≥ 26 patents (5)

MIT: ≥ 21 (31)

Page 123: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

123

Colleges and Universities USC: ≥ 26 patents (5)

MIT: ≥ 21 (31)

UTA/UTEP: ≥ 8 (7)

Page 124: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

Who Else Wants In?

Page 125: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

125

Who Else Wants In?

Epson: 5 years

–“We want our machines to make anything”

Page 126: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

126

Who Else Wants In?

Epson: 5 years

–“We want our machines to make anything”

Others ????

Page 127: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

127

Who Else Wants In?

Page 128: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

128

Who Else Wants In?

Page 129: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

129

Who Else Wants In? yuu

Page 130: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

130

Who Else Wants In?

Embedded ID

Selective curing VPP

Free-moving buildplate

Page 131: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

131

QUESTIONS??

[email protected]

Page 132: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

132

Thank you for your [email protected]

www.finnegan.com

FOLLOW MY TWEETS: @ JHornick3D1Stop

Page 133: Workshop 3: 3D Printing State of the Art: Industrial

133

DisclaimerThese materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of U.S. intellectual property law. These materials reflect only the personal views of the authors and are not a source of legal advice. It is understood that each case is fact specific, and that the appropriate solution in any case will vary. Therefore, these materials may or may not be relevant to any particular situation. Thus, the authors and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP cannot be bound either philosophically or as representatives of their various present and future clients to the comments expressed in these materials. The presentation of these materials does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with the authors or Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. While every attempt was made to ensure that these materials are accurate, errors or omissions may be contained therein, for which any liability is disclaimed.