Study unit 2:
Work-related personality research
Using examples, briefly explain how the classical personality theories are used in work-related personality research 15
Classical personality theories
According to these approaches, personality measurements use concepts (like specific traits and behaviours) from
one or more of these approaches as independent or predictor variables in order to find the relationship with work-
related correlates or dependent variables (for example training success and work performance ratings).
1. Types of personality variables from classical theories
Personality variables can be defined and measured according to various dimensions.
Here are some examples.
Single or multiple traits. This entails measuring only one specific personality trait, for example self-monitoring,
self-efficacy locus of control or multiple traits in a trait system (three [according to Eysenck's theory], five
[following the FFM] or sixteen traits [according to Cattell's theory]).
Cognitive and biologically based traits. This dimension is applied when work-related traits are
measured according to a cognitive approach – how people think and perceive things, problem-solving and
learning styles, etc. On the other hand, some personality traits have been verified to have a genetic,
biological or physiological basis (for example, introversion and sensation seeking).
Normal and abnormal traits. Many personality assessment techniques, such as the 16 PF, the NEO
personality tests and the occupational personality questionnaire (OPQ), are used to measure `'normal''
personality traits or behavior - behaviours which we demonstrate in our personal and work lives and
which do not cause discomfort to ourselves and others. Sometimes, however, we need to use more
clinically oriented assessment techniques to assess the intensity and frequency of certain ``abnormal'' or
disorganised behaviour (for example, depression, psychotism, anxiety-based behaviour, hypochondria
and phobias).
Dynamic versus stylistic traits. When we try to assess so-called dynamic traits or behaviour, we try to
determine possible deep-seated needs, fears and conflicts. These are not easily determined by objective
questionnaires, but rather by skilled psychologists through in-depth interviewing and other observation
techniques.
Page 1 of 25
According to Furnham, many of the classical psychological theories created research without much valid evidence
for the applicability of these personality concepts to work or organisational variables. Problems include conflicting
results from various researchers, while many studies are once-off attempts that are not repeated to verify findings.
Many results can instead be interpreted as a validation of the theoretical approaches and not as validation to
predict work-related behaviour.
2. Classical occupational/organisational psychology
In this approach, work-related variables as the independent variables from individuals (for example absenteeism
and productivity), groups (for example team output) or organisations (for example profit) are identified and
compared with their personality correlates. An example of this is job descriptions and situational analyses, after
which personality tests are selected or constructed to determine their relationship or fit with the selected work-
related variables. The main aim of this approach is to examine the correlation of specific personality factors with
specific work behaviours. This can be of help to human resources management in functions like selection,
training, performance appraisal and promotion.
The individual, group or organisational criterion measures can be determined in various ways (for example by
questionnaires, self-report techniques or interviews), measures can be a single criterion or combined or aggregate
measures and the variables can be used within one organisation or between organisations. In the latter case,
various organisations are analysed and compared for the applicability of the criterion measures and their
personality correlates.
The value of this approach is influenced by the same research problems as the classical personality approach.
Added to these are practices like using dated or popular measures of personality or too simplistic statistical
processing of research data. Also, it is often, ignored that the relationship between employee personality and work
behaviours cannot be controlled by the researcher or the individual employee only but is influenced by, many
powerful environmental and organisational factors.
Page 2 of 25
Briefly describe personality variables in work-related personality research with special focus on the following:
a. Types of personality variables from the classical theoriesb. Measures for work-specific individual differencesc. Biographical/case study research 15
a. Types of personality variables from classical theories
Personality variables can be defined and measured according to the following dimensions:
Single or multiple traits. This entails measuring only one specific personality trait, for example self-
monitoring, self-efficacy locus of control or multiple traits in a trait system.
Cognitive and biologically based traits. This dimension is applied when work-related traits are
measured according to a cognitive approach – how people think and perceive things, problem-solving and
learning styles. On the other hand, some personality traits have been verified to have a genetic, biological
or physiological basis (for example, introversion and sensation seeking).
Normal and abnormal traits. Many personality assessment techniques, such as the 16 PF, the NEO
personality tests and the occupational personality questionnaire (OPQ), are used to measure `'normal''
personality traits or behaviour – behaviours which we demonstrate in our personal and work lives and
which do not cause discomfort to ourselves and others.
Dynamic versus stylistic traits. When we try to assess dynamic traits or behaviour, we try to determine
possible deep-seated needs, fears and conflicts. These are not easily determined by objective
questionnaires, but rather by skilled psychologists through in-depth interviewing and other observation
techniques.
b. Measures for work-specific individual differences
In these instances, work-related measures are developed and applied to find personality predictors of specific
work behaviours. Examples are identifying individual differences or personality measures for selection within the
organisation, to predict absenteeism or withdrawal behaviours, or relating work stress to personality. There are
different types of measures of individual differences:
Narrow versus wide measures, for example to predict a specific work behaviour like absenteeism
compared to behaviours which could include various sub facets (for example, productivity and job
satisfaction).
Single versus multiple traits as in measuring one specific trait or behaviour (for example anxiety) or the
Protestant work ethic compared to using a test that measures multiple traits (for example measuring the
Page 3 of 25
big five personality factors by using the NEO personality questionnaire)
Self-report versus behavioural measures, for example using personality questionnaires or behavioural
techniques such as biodata, observing behaviour, taking physiological measures or even using behaviour
simulations in assessment centres
Attitudinal versus attributional measures, that is surveying attitudes, perceptions and beliefs about the
working environment, measuring employee beliefs about their attributes or how they contribute to the
causes and outcomes of work behaviour
Although this approach is promising for predicting specific work behaviours by using certain personality measures,
not much has been achieved in this regard except for some work on the attributional style of employees.
Problems are faulty research procedures (like confusing independent and dependent variables), not tracing the
background factors of measured traits (that is, what causes the measured traits) and the possibly limited
applicability of these specific measures because the validity findings will be coupled to specific work-related
behaviours only.
c. Biographical/case study researchThis model uses personality profiles of outstanding individuals or groups to examine work success criteria. In a
social context, and even a work context, it is possible that many South Africans would use Nelson Mandela or
other well-known people as role models. There are, however, variations in the application of this approach:
Individual versus group studies. The latter refers to the analysis of business groups or families in
business, and even analysing the attributes of training institutions or work organisations where such
outstanding individuals worked and studied. In this regard entrepreneurial profiles are often constructed
from psychological attributes, successful work behaviour, attributes from a person's background, their
business environment and the organisation they work in.
Monetary versus other success criteria. However, it is not easy to decide which criteria to use to define
excellence in a specific case or situation.
Impressionistic versus scholarly. This means that successful entrepreneurs are often profiled in a
vague, romantic and subjective way while some of the other criteria, could be more concrete and
objective in referring to specific successful behaviours and outcomes.
This approach has an intuitive attraction because biographers often present successful individuals in a subjective,
intuitive and idealistic way that reflects dreamlike desires (for example, the often-heard ideal of ``the American
dream''). In research findings such profiles are often of only one or a few people, there are no control groups, few
objective assessment results and little hypotheses testing, both in measuring personality and work success
criteria.
Page 4 of 25
Discuss various approaches to identifying personality and work performance variables (independent and dependent variables) to use in work related personality research, and also illustrate and explain a possible integrated research approach (25 marks – assign 3)
In not more than five lines for each, explain the use of five theoretical approaches (excluding the classical personality theories) in work-related personality research 25
1. Measures for work-specific individual differences
There are different types of measures of individual differences:
Narrow versus wide measures, for example to predict a specific work behaviour like absenteeism
compared to behaviours which could include various sub facets (for example, productivity and job
satisfaction).
Single versus multiple traits as in measuring one specific trait or behaviour (for example anxiety) or the
Protestant work ethic compared to using a test that measures multiple traits (for example measuring the
big five personality factors by using the NEO personality questionnaire)
Self-report versus behavioural measures, for example using personality questionnaires or behavioural
techniques such as biodata, observing behaviour, taking physiological measures or even using behaviour
simulations in assessment centres
Attitudinal versus attributional measures, that is surveying attitudes, perceptions and beliefs about the
working environment, measuring employee beliefs about their attributes or how they contribute to the
causes and outcomes of work behaviour
2. Person-work environment fit and misfit models
In these approaches similar traits or characteristics in people and work environments are correlated to
find the best or desired fit (or undesired misfit).
Measures of occupational fit or misfit are varied, and can emphasise either the individual or jobs (or a
combination of both), as in Holland's theory and related measurement techniques.
Another variation is to measure fit in terms of a subjective impressionistic manner (employees think they
fit) or in a more concrete fashion where fit is based on observed behaviours.
A last method is to base fit on similarity or dissimilarity between people; or on complementary fit, which is
Page 5 of 25
based on people differing but complementing one another because of certain attributes they have.
A good example of the person-job fit approach is Holland's self-directed search (SDS) measurement in
which certain personality types are associated with certain work environment types.
3. Longitudinal work-related personality studies
In this type of research, conducted over longer periods, the real cause and effect relationship can be determined
in work-related personality variables in and between individuals, organisations and work behaviour, and also in
how change over time influences the relationship and prediction of work behaviour.
Longitudinal research is arguably the most effective, but it is also very expensive and it is very difficult to
sustain and control all variables and changes over time. This type of research can have various forms.
Longitudinal studies can be executed in short, medium and long time frames. However, it is not always
clear when research should be classified in these time frames.
Research in and between organisations is possible. However, research in organisations can restrict the
volume of variables involved, while research between organisations suffers loss of validity because it is
difficult to control all variables.
Retrospective studies entail getting data from historical or archival sources, but control is difficult and
many influencing factors may be unknown or necessary data might not be obtained. In comparison,
prospective research makes it possible to plan well, obtain all the needed data and have good control;
analysis of data can be postponed until all data have been captured.
4. Biographical/case study research
This model uses personality profiles of outstanding individuals or groups to examine work success criteria. In a
social context, and even a work context, it is possible that many South Africans would use Nelson Mandela or
other well-known people as role models. There are, however, variations in the application of this approach:
Individual versus group studies. The latter refers to the analysis of business groups or families in
business, and even analysing the attributes of training institutions or work organisations where such
outstanding individuals worked and studied.
Monetary versus other success criteria. However, it is not easy to decide which criteria to use to define
excellence in a specific case or situation.
Impressionistic versus scholarly This means that successful entrepreneurs are often profiled in a vague,
Page 6 of 25
romantic and subjective way while some of the other criteria, could be more concrete and objective in
referring to specific successful behaviours and outcomes.
This approach has an intuitive attraction because biographers often present successful individuals in a subjective,
intuitive and idealistic way that reflects dreamlike desires (for example, the often-heard ideal of ``the American
dream'').
Page 7 of 25
By stating a research question or problem, select and explain each of the following variables and concepts in work-related personality research:
- Independent variable/s
- Dependent variable/s
- Moderator variable/s
- Correlation
- Relationship versus cause 25
Describe various types of research variables (discuss only two) 10
1. Independent variables
The predictors or independent variables obtained from personality theory and research concepts in work-
related personality research are mostly scores on self-report questionnaires.
However, scores for personality type measures or individual differences can also be obtained from
intelligence and ability tests, biodata measures, physiological measures, expert classifications or ratings
in behaviour observation like interviews and measures to indicate positions or roles in organisations, etc.
Predictor scores only represent what they measure.
Predictor scores can never exactly correspond to the underlying trait, because respondents may try to
control or manage what others think about them, predictor scores will have some reliability and validity
problems.
We cannot obtaining perfect correlations.
Psychological assessment has developed its own psychometric and other rules for scientific
measurement and best practices, providing a body of evidence that many psychological measures are
reliable and valid.
Personality measures as independent variables in assessment and research are now considered good
predictors of work performance.
2. Dependent variables
Dependent or outcome variables in research and assessment refer to those traits, states, behaviour and
other measurable concepts used to represent the quantity and quality levels of work or occupational and
organisational performance and behaviour, referred to as work performance criteria.
The main objective is to define valid and reliable work performance criteria, measure them accurately and
Page 8 of 25
find their correlates or the relationship with measures for personality or individual differences in order to
predict occupational behaviours successfully.
The aim is to explain the impact of personality in work or to have an idea of how much variance in work
behaviour can be explained by personality.
3. Moderator variables
A moderator or intervening variable serves as a mediator or ``go-between'' between other variables; or it
confounds the relationship, correlation or variation between other variables.
Moderator variables should be identified, conceptualised and measured (or controlled) as accurately as
possible.
Although certain types of concepts may traditionally be used more as the predictor and outcome
variables, while other variables mostly have a moderating function, the role of a research variable will
depend on the research problem or questions and the related stated hypotheses.
4. Correlation
A correlation is a statistical indication, ranging between 71 (perfect negative) and, 00 of relationship+1,00
(perfect positive), of the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables (for example,
between job satisfaction and absenteeism the correlation might be 0,45, meaning that the correlation of
0,45 explains more or less 45% of the variance between job satisfaction and absenteeism).
Correlations only explain the strength of a relationship as either positive or negative, and from this the
chances of predicting one variable from another can be estimated.
5. Relationship or cause?
A correlation which gives a good indication of the strength and direction of a relationship between
variables does not necessarily explain the cause/s of behaviour.
It is a fact that certain genetic and acquired behaviours cause certain personality traits and behaviours.
However, it is not always easy to make such an assumption about all variables.
Only if all influencing factors have been isolated and relationships have been verified and repeated by a
body of research can causality be explained, for example that negative feedback causes job
dissatisfaction.
Page 9 of 25
Discuss, in details, models of work performance measurements 15
Describe models or approaches to explain the measurement of work performance, and refer to correct and future emphasis with regard to predictor and outcome variables in work-related personality research.
25
Models of work performance measurement
These approaches emphasise work performance measures because personality factors as outcome criteria are
also included or the relationship with personality measures may be indicated.
1. Earlier models of work performance measurement
These models used mainly ability personality factors (for example, intelligence and numerical ability) in
relation to work performance measures.
In an early model by Hunter cognitive ability was used as a causal factor for two types of work behaviour:
job knowledge and job performance (both measured by work samples and supervisor ratings), in which
Hunter found some validity; personality was viewed as a poor predictor of occupational or work
performance.
Hunter, however, recognised that many other factors could explain the variation in work performance and,
for this reason, Guion suggested that Hunter's causal model of work performance be expanded to also
include work performance attributes of the employee who is being rated.
A further addition to this causal model was by Schmidt, Hunter and Outerbridge, who added job
experience, which they found had an indirect effect on work performance, because ability and job
experience have a direct impact on job knowledge, work performance and performance on work sample
tests.
These models started to add more importance to the role of personality variables as part of work
performance criteria.
2. Later models of work performance measurement
Following Project A, which was a major research project into the relationship between personality and
work behaviour, Borman, White, Pulakos and Oppler verified Hunter's 1983 model.
However, they obtained far better correlations with work performance measures by adding to the model
the factors of achievement orientation, dependability awards and disciplinary infractions for problem
Page 10 of 25
behaviour. These, findings highlighted personality as an important determinant of supervisory ratings of
work performance and also indicated how dependability determines the acquisition of job knowledge.
In an expansion on their model, Borman, White and Dorsey, in a study with military employees, added
other personality factors: dependability, agreeableness (friendliness), obnoxiousness and show or flare.
These personality factors were correlated for their impact on overall measures of work performance by
supervisory and peer ratings.
Only agreeableness was found to have no influence on supervisory and peer ratings of work performance
and was left out of the model.
Their model explained more of the variance with overall supervisory and peer ratings.
The 1995 study by Borman et al was criticised for research flaws, for example inadequate theory and
criterion measures, and assessing only military employees.
In a civilian sample where customer contact is often more important, agreeableness could have been a
good predictor of work performance, especially if teamwork was used as a job performance measure in
place of overall job performance.
These findings illustrate the importance of well-selected measures and careful scrutiny of predictor and
criterion measures for types of jobs and situations in order to find models which can be valid in specific
and general applications, but which are also integrative in the sense that they consider all possible
determinants of work performance.
3. Newer directions in work-related personality research
More current theoretical and research emphasis includes outcome variables for individual and group level
criteria, dynamic or changing criteria, and typical versus maximum performance work performance
criteria.
For predictor or independent variables, the emphasis is on compound or multiple variables and the more
specific analysis and measurement of personality factors and their relationship to specific work
performance criteria across jobs and situations.
Other predictor variables that are emphasised are group-level predictors, situational variables, job fit,
culture and research settings.
New directions in work-related personality research also consider the influence of other types of research
variables which influence relationships, for example moderator and other types of influences.
Other personality theories and taxonomies (classifications) of personality traits are also emphasised in
current and future research.
Methods to measure personality and its attributes are continually scrutinised, for example measurement
issues like item theory bandwidths of measurements, cross-cultural considerations and assessment,
Page 11 of 25
instructions.
In methodology an important emphasis is multilevel assessment and analysis, while social and legal
issues should always be considered in a changing work and assessment environment.
Some of these issues are highlighted in some detail under the headings below.
(a) Dependent variables
Current and future perspectives in research and practice include the following emphasis on a more specific
analysis of criterion or outcome variables:
Individual-level
o criteria that is measuring the work performance of individual employees on more than overall
measures or ratings of job performance.
o These more specific outcome measures may be criteria or outcomes like counterproductive
behaviours, contextual performance, task performance etc.
o These factors further demonstrate that personality-related measures can be used as work
performance or outcome criteria.
Group-level outcomes
o Jackson describes six team effectiveness criteria: problem-solving, task execution, creative
decision-making, internal group processes, group stability and external liaison.
o Cohen and Bailey use another classification of group or team effectiveness, namely performance,
attitudinal and behavioural outcomes – which may integrate most of Jackson's criteria. These two
classifications obviously overlap in variables, but each model (and a possible integration of both)
should still be verified further.
o Taggar, however, found that underlying group processes may modify the interface between
individual-level creativity and group-level creativity.
Dynamic criteria
o That is how the variance or relationship between work performance criteria changes.
o This is particularly important because in many human resources practices the same predictor and
Page 12 of 25
outcome measures are often used for long periods, while many change and transformation processes
may have occurred in the nature of work and working environments.
It is also essential to establish whether performance or outcome criteria can be described as typical compared to maximum performance measures.
(b) Independent variables
The analysis of group-level personality predictor variables indicated that groups high on certain big five
personality traits (for example extroversion, conscientiousness, agreeableness and openness to
experience) correlated significantly with relationship conflict and work performance in the group. However,
the types of groups and tasks may also influence the relationship between personality and behaviour or
performance in the group.
Situational variables may, and mostly do, influence personality traits and behaviour. Situational issues
which have been found to impact on the relationship between personality and work performance are
types of tasks, types of teams, types of jobs or job characteristics, person-job fit, culture and the research
settings.
4. Other directions in work-related personality research
One future perspective is the function of personality variables.
Another direction of research is the development of new personality theories and taxonomies for
personality structure, and also new measurement techniques.
According to Barrick and Ryan, models of work performance will also benefit by making more use of
predictor concepts in other types of personality theories for the prediction of work performance, a
requirement being that such concepts can be adequately verified and measured.
With regard to personality measurement methods, a renewed emphasis will have to be given to
assessment strategies, measurement accuracy and alternative ways of measuring personality.
Cross-cultural assessment also remains an important measurement issue as a consequence of diverse
work groups and employment of ``alien'' or culturally estranged employees.
Work-related personality measurements and research models should continually determine the effects of
test instructions and other test-taking behaviours, like participants who are trained in measurement
methods and constructs, and test responses which indicate faking or socially desirable behaviour.
The emphasis on multiple-level assessment is an important development because it brings in an
integrative and systems perspective, and not only single determinants like the individual employee or the
Page 13 of 25
organisation.
A last issue concerns certain social, ethical and legal requirements amidst increasing diversity in the
workforce, and pressure for non-discriminatory assessment, research and related issues.
Page 14 of 25
Two methods of using research to predict work behaviour or performance were identified by Furham (1992; 1997). Identify one method and with an aid of a diagram, discuss such method. 10
Make visual presentations of the adapted Furnham models for work-related personality research and describe all the applicable variables. 25
A research model
Furnham asserts that many of the abovementioned approaches, and considerable research on work-related
personality variables, are theoretically and methodologically poor. For this reason he suggests a research and
assessment model to illustrate the complex possibilities in the relationships between personality/individual
differences and work-related variables. Figure 2.2 illustrates most of the personality or individual differences which
are mostly used in assessment for personnel selection in order to predict occupational behaviour.
Page 15 of 25
Furnham's model explains the interaction between personality and work behaviour according to four paths.
Firstly the relationship between personality factors and work or organisational variables is not direct and
can be influenced by many other factors. This line indicates a two-way relationship between personality
and work. Personality or work factors can have mutual or interactional influence; personality may
influence work behaviours or create the predisposition for them, but work variables may in turn influence
the expression or functioning of personality through the process of socialisation in organisations. This
relationship between personality factors and work-related behaviours is indirect and multi-causal. This
makes the exact prediction of work-related personality behaviours extremely difficult.
Block B illustrates the possible mechanisms, processes or phenomena according to which work-related
personality behaviour can be explained, measured and studied. These concepts (sometimes very
complex or very simplistic) make it possible, for example, to relate the concepts of locus of control, self-
efficacy introversion, extroversion and conscientiousness or a whole system of traits, (such as the 16
personality factors measured by the 16PF) to certain occupational behaviours.
The relationship between personality and work variables is further influenced by organisational
behaviours (block C) like certain structures, selection and other assessment procedures, informal and
formal ways and rules of doing things, and reward systems. All these factors mediate the contract or
relationship between employees and the organisation and its expectations: for some employees it may be
the ideal person-job fit, while others may experience misfit, incongruence or dissatisfaction because their
own profile and that of the organisation does not fit.
A fourth path is the influence of the broader environment on personality and organisational/work
performance in which the organisation and the individual exist. Individual differences stemming from
employee history and changes in surrounding environments (for example, political, economic and work
technology) will impact on employee personality and related behaviours. An example of these spill-over
effects is the work-home context in which family responsibilities have been shown to have work-related
consequences, such as absenteeism and turnover. Environmental demands may lead to products and
employees being less efficient in their job performance, with the resultant job losses and other health
problems.
Page 16 of 25
With examples, describe at least four types of work performance criteria. 15
Work performance criteria can be classified into hard and soft data
Soft criteria Hard criteriaWork habits: absenteeism, doctor visits, tardiness,
lateness, violations of specific rules, excessive breaks
Output: units produced, items assembled or sold,
profits/money made, patients visited, loans approved,
students graduated/passed
Work climate: number of grievances or other
complaints, employee turnover
Costs: budget/unit costs, operating costs, amount of
savings, sales expenses
Attitudes/feelings: attitude changes, job
role/responsibility perceptions, measures of loyalty
commitment,
Time: equipment down time, overtime, task completion
time, time waste (e. g. absences, lateness, lost days),
work stoppages
Skills: decisions made, problems solved,
grievances/complaints solved, use of new skills
Quality: scrap/waste/rejects, error rates, shortages,
work repeat, volume of tasks completed, number of
accidents, deviations from standards
Initiative: number of new ideas/suggestions, using new
ideas/suggestions, successful completion of tasks
Development/advancement: number of promotions,
number of merit pay increases, training programmes
attended, transfer requests, performance appraisal
ratings
Page 17 of 25
By referring to research cited in this study unit (or other information), briefly state why you agree or disagree with the following statement: “Personality was and still is a very poor predictor of work performance”. 15
The history of work-related personality research has entrenched various applications of personality assessment in
the work context; moreover, it has shown that personality assessment is a significant predictor of work performance. Current emphasis on improved analyses of the theoretical or measurement constructs for
personality and work performance criteria, more accurate assessment techniques and better research procedures
have led to a renewed interest in the place of personality research and assessment in the work life, and to an
increase in positive results in the relationship or correlations between personality factors and work performance
criteria.
Whereas in the past, jobs were based on the industrialised economy that emphasized assessment of physical,
motor and intellectual abilities, the modern economic and work environment emphasises team work, change and
diversity in jobs, jobs have more of a service orientation, information and digital contents are the order of the day
and the world of work has become, globalised. The modern world of work will demand increasingly new and
updated competencies and behavioural models to understand human behaviour in the work context. It seems as if
personality factors and competencies to cope with and adjust to ever-changing work environments, to be flexible
and respond quickly to modern business requirements, to deal with diversity in workforces, effective interpersonal
skills, self-management, and entrepreneurship and organisational citizenship behaviours may be emphasised in
future jobs and in research and assessment of work-related personality correlates. Though still existing in many
work environments, stable job and career descriptions are now being replaced by expectancies of being more
flexible and adaptable with just-in-time competencies.
A last issue – while the literature has provided a great deal of proof of the efficient role of individual difference
factors in predicting the work performance of individual employees, much less has been done in group- and
organisational-level performance criteria. This may represent a difference of perception and emphasis between
work-related personality theorists and researchers, and may explain why in many cases organisational
management doubt the use of personality measures.
Conclusion: I therefore disagree with the above statement on the grounds that personality differences may have
been insignificant during the industrial era but now during the information and service era there is a great
correlation between success in certain types of jobs and certain types of personalities.
Page 18 of 25
Explain factors which may influence work-related personality research. 10
INFLUENCING FACTORS ON WORK-RELATED PERSONALITY RESEARCH
Many factors, controlled or uncontrolled, may influence the relationship between personality and / or individual
differences and work behaviour.
The way in which research variables are conceptualised.
The manner in which research variables are measured with well-designed or selected measures; whether
these techniques measure what they are supposed to measure.
Whether well-designed or selected measures are used to measure variables which will provide more or
less similar or consistent results in various situations.
The execution of faulty research processes, for example comparing research groups which are not
necessarily comparable, incorrect statistical analyses and not controlling confounding variables
The way in which the relationship or causal patterns between personality and work performance are
interpreted will determine the assumptions made in the literature and in applying such findings in
practices such as selection, promotion assessment and research
Page 19 of 25
Briefly describe methods to assess or measure work performance. 15
CLASSIFYING AND MEASURING WORK-RELATED CRITERIA
Job performance criteria
There are many ways to classify and measure work performance criteria. However, the same rules for scientific
measurement should also apply here. Many problems in applying criteria work-related to personality assessment
are the result of vague and inaccurate work performance criteria, and the way they are conceptualised and
measured.
Hackman and Lawler proposed a very useful classification, classifying work performance criteria in four main
dimensions: variety, autonomy, task identity and feedback. If these attributes receive high priority in jobs,
employees with a good sense of accomplishment and growth will experience work as meaningful with high job
satisfaction, will be less absent and will be rated highly by their supervisors. Another important issue in measuring
work performance is the rules set out by Smith, which still apply Performance measures or ratings should be
executed shortly after the actual job behavior has taken place, and performance measures may be on a specific
aspect of job performance (for example, satisfaction with salary) or on overall work performance (for example,
applying a measure for general work satisfaction which includes many aspects of job performance and the
organisation). Smith also indicates that work performance measures should be as close as possible to the
organisational goals at three levels:
Behaviours refer to actual observed or measured work behaviours, for example volume and accuracy in
completing a task or product.
Results refer to the effectiveness or quality of the work behaviours involved in completed work, for
example indicators by objective measures of absence and work speed.
Organisational effectiveness may include behaviour and results measures of all employees and other
measures for business success, for example whether business goals (such as budget, sales, profit) were
achieved.
Work performance criteria can also be classified into hard and soft data, which can be measured as
presented in the table below.
Page 20 of 25
Work performance criteria can be classified into hard and soft data
Soft criteria Hard criteria
Work habits: absenteeism, doctor visits, tardiness,
lateness, violations of specific rules, excessive breaks
Output: units produced, items assembled or sold,
profits/money made, patients visited, loans approved,
students graduated/passed
Work climate: number of grievances or other
complaints, employee turnover
Costs: budget/unit costs, operating costs, amount of
savings, sales expenses
Attitudes/feelings: attitude changes, job
role/responsibility perceptions, measures of loyalty
commitment,
Time: equipment down time, overtime, task completion
time, time waste (e. g. absences, lateness, lost days),
work stoppages
Skills: decisions made, problems solved,
grievances/complaints solved, use of new skills
Quality: scrap/waste/rejects, error rates, shortages,
work repeat, volume of tasks completed, number of
accidents, deviations from standards
Initiative: number of new ideas/suggestions, using new
ideas/suggestions, successful completion of tasks
Development/advancement: number of promotions,
number of merit pay increases, training programmes
attended, transfer requests, performance appraisal
ratings
Methods to obtain criteria scores
To obtain work performance scores or indicators the hard and soft criteria data can be used in any one or a
combination of many methods as follows:
Counts on personnel and organisational records of factors such as illness, lateness, absences, turnover,
accidents, profits, work stoppages, duration of employment and number of complaints from clients
Specific inventories to measure certain types of job performance or behaviours
Supervisory ratings on specific or general aspects of work performance, for example general work
Page 21 of 25
performance and promotability
Various types of performance appraisal (for example by management and colleagues)
Profits/income and other organisational success criteria
Productivity volumes in organisations
Behavioural observations and ratings, for example of leadership behaviour
Page 22 of 25
Personality theories are also associated with individual difference. Discuss personality theories and indicate each theory’s contribution to the uniqueness of each person (individual differences). 15
Page 23 of 25
With examples, briefly explain how research variables can be identified according to various psychological theories or approaches. (10 marks – Oct 10 exam)
A variable is a characteristic that can vary or change in interaction with other variables or situations e.g. learning can change according to different teaching methods. Personality factors are usually used as independent variables which will influence the dependant variable. Personality variables can be defined and measured in various dimensions:
a Single or multiple traitso Only one specific personality trait is measured within a trait system
b Cognitive and biologically based traitso Here work related traits are measured according to a cognitive approach e.g. problem solving
and learning styles.o Some personality traits have been verified to have a genetic, biological or physiological basis
c Normal and abnormal traitso Many personality techniques are used to measure “normal” personality traits or behaviour.
Sometimes the use of more clinically oriented assessment techniques to assess the intensity and frequency of certain “abnormal” behaviour is needed.
d Dynamic versus stylistic traitso In assessing dynamic traits we try to determine possible deep-seated needs, fears and conflicts.
These should be determined by skilled psychologists through in-depth interviews and other observation techniques.
Because employee personality is influenced by many environmental and organizational factors, work-related measures were developed and applied to find personality predictors of specific work behaviours. There are 4 different types of measures:
a Narrow versus wide measureso Predicting a specific work behaviour e.g. absenteeism compared to behaviours that could
include various sub facets e.g. productivity and job satisfaction
b Single vs multiple traitso Measuring one specific trait or behaviour e.g. anxiety
c Self-report versus behavioural measureso Using personality questionnaires or behavioural techniques e.g. biodata, observing behaviour,
taking physiological measures
d Attitudinal versus attributional measureso Surveying attitudes, perceptions and beliefs about the working environment.
Page 24 of 25
The Biographical/case study research model uses personality profiles of outstanding individuals to examine work success criteria.
a Individual versus group studieso A group study is the analyses of business groups and analyzing the attributes of training
institutions or work organizations where outstanding individuals worked or studied. Entrepreneurial profiles are often constructed from psychological attributes, successful work behaviour, a person’s background and their business environment and organisation they work in.
b Monetary versus other success criteriao It is not easy to decide on which criteria to use to define excellence in a specific case.
c Impressionistic versus scholarlyo Successful entrepreneurs are often profiled in a vague, romantic and subjective way, while
some other criteria could be more concrete and objective in referring to specific successful behaviours and outcomes.
This approach has an intuitive attraction as biographers often present successful individuals in a subjective, intuitive and idealistic way that reflects dreamlike desires.
Page 25 of 25
Top Related