State Personnel Service of the Kyrgyz Republic
Oleg S. Tarbinski, Deputy Director of SPS
25th of August, 2015
Performance appraisal of state bodies’ personnel in the Kyrgyz Republic: practice and perspectives
Valuation levels in state bodies
1. State bodies performance appraisal2. Evaluation of structural units of state bodies3. Personnel performance appraisal
2
1. State bodies performance appraisal
• Evaluation is carried out according to the procedure that approved by the Government in 2012
• Used "360“ methodology for appraisal: score at base index; self-concept; international rating; population confidence index
3
State bodies’ base index
• State bodies’ base index are approved annually
• Ministry of Economy coordinates this process
4
Examples of state bodies performance measures
• Ministry of Health
5
To reduce cardiovascular mortality, %
To reduce child mortality index, %
Children coverage up to 2 years of vaccinal complex, %
To reduce tuberculosis deaths per 100 thousand population, %
To reduce the number of complaints of funds extortion
To increase the number of villages that involved in the health promotion program
Examples of state bodies performance measures
Ministry of Education and Science To give more visibility of preschool education, % To provide all eligible children (grades 1-9) with
compulsory education, % To increase the number of students in vocational
secondary education in the light of employers’ needs, people
To increase percent of universities that form a plan of acceptance according to the government order in response to an enquiry from employers, %
The ratio of issued licenses and reasoned refusals to the total number of license applications, %
6
7
Variative data
State body determines the data by itself
The data are determined in the light of specific features of field and upstanding challenges (strategies, programs, plans, current assignments, etc.).
8
International rating for assessНаименование индекса Источник
Integrated index of state administration: Voice and Accountability; Political Stability and Absence of Violence; Government Effectiveness; Regulatory Quality; Rule of Law; Control of Corruption, etc.
World Bank
The Sustainable Society Index
Corruption Perception Index Transparency International
Global Competitiveness Index International Economic Forum
Immunization Rates International Health Agency
Health Expenditures International Health Agency
Doing Business Index World Bank
Index of economic freedom Heritage FoundationResearch Centre
The Global Peace Index (GPI)
The Environmental Performance Index
Global Age Wath Index
Worldwide Press Freedom Index
9
Population confidence index(Conducted by the National Statistics Committee based
on survey of the population)
List of state bodies and municipal authorities
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3How much do you trust this
body?
What kind of the corruption
level, on your opinion has the
body?
Could you please assess quality of the
work (provided services and
functions)Ministry of Foreign Affairs(Protection of the Kyrgyz Republic interests, as well as the rights of the citizens abroad, consular assistance, notarial services, drawing up and obtaining of documents for the Kyrgyz Republic citizens abroad, procurement of visas for foreign citizens)
Ministry of Internal Affairs (Enforcement of public order, road safety, crime fighting, notice of conviction destribution)
10
Integrated appraisal index of the state body
• State body calculates by itself under the formula that based on four components: core indicators; variative index; international rating;population confidence index
• Ministry of Economy verifies the calculation• The information transfers to the Government
11
Example of calculation integral indicator of appraisal ratio
Integrated variative index
International rating
integrated index – 0,27
Ministry of Agriculture and meliorationIntegrated base index Unachieved base index
1. private investment in the processing industry – 0,67
2. increase in the number of agricultural cooperatives – 0,78
3. quantity input of irrigated land, - 0 4. number of breeding farm - 0
12
2. Appraisal of the state body’s structural subdivisions
Index Indicator PointCompliance with the challenges facing the state body
Generalized baseline appraisal index of the state body 10
The degree of fulfillment of the "personal" manager’s plan 10
The extent of changes in the international ranking 5
Effectiveness Percentage of plan execution units 5Percentage of performance above plan works 10
The effectiveness of the personnel department
The average value of civil servants’ appraisal 10
Development and capacity building All employees are trained timely to improve the skills 5There is a development plan (strategy) of subdivision 5Development of a state language 7
Initiative and innovation Availability of initiatives to improve the efficiency of department, state body or supervised areas actually implemented in practice
8
The introduction of e-governance Development of IT-technologies 10
Executive discipline The ratio of timely and quality of documents’ execution to the total number of documents, %
5
Labour discipline The absence of violation of labour discipline and comments 10
The maximum possible score 100
13
3. Staff performance appraisal
• Features of performance appraisal in Kyrgyzstan:
The correlation with an index of state body through the planning system;
Reflects employee’s real contribution; Motivates to improve work
14
• Personnel performance appraisal system was approved by a decision of the Government on June 28, 2013;
• It spreads to 30 state bodies and municipal authorities;
• Launched from January 1, 2014
History of performance appraisal system
15
Types of performance appraisal
Employees performance appraisal conducts following the results of quarter and year• Head of department estimates quarterly;• The Commission estimates annually according
to the results of the quarterly evaluation;• The annual assessment affects to the
establishment of step (ratio) of payment
16
Performance appraisal begins with planning
Act of task description for employeeFull name of employee: _____________________________________________Department: ____________________________________Position: ________________________________________Appraisal period:from "__" _________ to "__" _________ 20__
Full name of direct supervisor: ______________Signature: ____________________
Full name of employee: ________________ Signature: _________________________
Date: ____________________________
N Task Measures on task performance
Result Deadline Note
1 2 3 4 5
17
Correcting task description Act of correcting task description for employee
Full name of employee: _____________________________________________Department/Position: ____________________________________Appraisal period:from "__" _________ to "__" _________ 20__
Full name of direct supervisor: ______________Signature: ____________________
Full name of employee: ________________ Signature: _________________________
Date: ____________________________
N Task (correct) Measures (correct) Result Deadline Reason for changes
1 2 3 4 5
18
Employees reportFull name of employee: _____________________________________________Department/Position: ____________________________________Appraisal period:from "__" _________ to "__" _________ 20__
Full name of employee: ________________ Signature: _________________________
Date: ____________________________
N Task Measure Compliance with the period of performance
Performance report
Note
1 2 3 4 5
19
Supervisors report on task description for employee
Full name of employee: _____________________________________________Department/Position: ____________________________________Appraisal period:from "__" _________ to "__" _________ 20__
Full name of direct supervisor/position: ______________Comment of the supervisor on the quarterly assessment: ___________Suggestions for improving the performance : ____________Estimate (average): ____________Signature of direct supervisor: ___________________Full name, signature : _____________________Date of review:
Criteria for appraisal Quarterly appraisalBased criteria:
1. Effectiveness 2. Accuracy 3. Timeliness 4. Discipline 5. Observance of ethics standards
Added criteria:6. Independence 7. Creativity 8. Initiative 9. Cooperation
20
Based criteria1 1. Effectiveness To reflect how well and good the employee work
2 2. Accuracy To show correct performance3 3. Timeliness To define the deadlines of execution of work4 4. Discipline To fix the execution of labor discipline5 5.Observance of ethics
standardsTo appraise the behavior and professional attitude to the duties
Added criteria6 Independence To specify the employee's ability to orient himself and do the job
without advice within the competence
7 Creativity To specify an employee’s analytical and creative approach to decision-making and prepare a solution
8 Initiative The ability of employee to take the initiative and responsibility of the job within the competence
9 Degree of cooperation To display the employee's ability to build communications with supervisors, colleagues and subordinates
Based and added criteria of performance appraisal of employee
21
Appraisal meaning
Appraisal set on a five grade scale:- With an average score from 4.6 to 5, inclusive, it is rated "Excellent"- With an average score from 3.6 to 4.5 - "Good"- With an average score from 2.6 to 3.5 - "Satisfactory"- With an average score below 2.6, inclusive - "Disappointing."
22
Appraisal effects on
• establishment of step (ratio) of payment;• employees attestation;• making recommendations for skills
improvement
23
A new pay system that cover by appraisal system
Ministries, state committees. Administrative agencies, regional administrations, mayor's office in
Bishkek and Osh, etc.
Subordinate authorities of state bodies
Oblast structures of state bodies, mayors office of oblast significance
Rayon and city structures of state bodies and etc. Mayor’s office and Kenesh of city of district subordinance Ail okmot (village Government), urban services of city of district
subordinance
position classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Highest"А" Х Х Х Х Х 4,20 4,41 4,63 4,86 5,11 5,36 5,63 5,91 6,21 6,52 6,84
Highest “B" Х Х Х 3,31 3,48 3,65 3,83 4,03 4,23 4,44 4,66 4,89 5,14 5,40 5,67 5,95
Chief "А" Х 2,61 2,74 2,88 3,02 3,18 3,33 3,50 3,68 3,86 4,05 4,26 4,47 4,69 4,93 5,17
Chief “B" 2,07 2,18 2,29 2,40 2,52 2,65 2,78 2,92 3,06 3,22 3,38 3,55 3,72 3,91 4,11 4,31
Senior "А" 1,73 1,81 1,91 2,00 2,10 2,21 2,32 2,43 2,55 2,68 2,81 2,96 3,10 3,26 3,42 3,59
Senior “B" 1,44 1,51 1,59 1,67 1,75 1,84 1,93 2,03 2,13 2,23 2,35 2,46 2,59 2,72 2,85 2,99
Junior"А" 1,20 1,26 1,32 1,39 1,46 1,53 1,61 1,69 1,77 1,86 1,95 2,05 2,16 2,26 2,38 2,49
Junior “B" 1 1,05 1,1 1,16 1,22 1,28 1,35 1,41 1,48 1,56 1,63 1,72 1,8 1,89 1,99 2,09
24
Future development of performance appraisal
• It is planned to strengthen the role of the staff evaluation;
• It will increase the employees motivation to work with contribution assessment;
• It is considering the idea of employees career planning and promotion based on evaluation
25
Accounting performance appraisal in the newprojects of regulations
• A draft law "On state civil service and municipal service“;
• The draft law considers career planning and staff evaluation system to replace competence assessment;
• The draft law approved by the Government and passed first reading in Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic;
• In September, it is scheduled to hold parliamentary hearings on the draft law
26
Thank you for your attention!
Top Related