8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
1/95
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
2/95
2
Abstract
The future of our world is the future of cities. Therefore, building a holistic
guiding framework for urban sustainability, which can be used in urban governance,
decision-making, capacity building, education and public awareness raising is a critical
key for a sustainable future. The thesis uses visionary and holistic approach in dealing
with urban issues. What makes a livable and sustainable city? How do people perceive
urban sustainability? How do people envision their dream cities? Among many aspects of
urban development, what matter most to them? What are public perceptions on current
urban development in HCMC? This thesis seeks to find answers for these questions, from
suggestions of experts and think tanks, to peoples opinions, their hopes and dreams.Beside the international document research and the global online survey, the case of public
perception in Ho Chi Minh City was also investigated with both online and offline
questionnaires and interviews of people in some slum areas.
Findings from experts bring out that sustainability associates with balance and equity in a
comprehensive approach, which acknowledges the interrelationships among various
dimensions of life and our interconnectedness with each other and with natural systems.
Urban sustainability strives for ecological balance, low-carbon economic development,
social inclusion and cultural vitality. Among these dimensions, good governance which is
accountable, transparent, democratic and efficient plays a vital role as inclusive decision
making processes toward sustainability.
A series of concepts and features for urban sustainability such as sense of place, green,
human friendliness, renewable energy, waste recycling, bicycle friendly and walkable
neighborhoods, rainwater harvesting, affordable housing, inclusiveness, e-governance
has been developed in the questionnaire to test responses from public perception on their
desirable city. Most of these ideas were well received by respondents; this proves that a
sustainable city can also be a desirable and lovable city. On the other hand, findings from
survey of public perception on HCMCs urban performance as well as field study in some
slum areas in the city present quite a gloomy picture. Poverty alleviation, education,
empowerment, capacity building and public awareness raising are recommended for
bringing about social change toward a sustainable urban future.
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
3/95
3
Acknowledgments
From Daisy with love
First of all, I wish to express my sincere gratitude to the two supervisors, Prof. Kosta
Mathey and Prof. Michael Schmidt for their kind guidance and for giving me a chance to
join this wonderful UDP course.
I greatly appreciate the consideration of our course coordinators, Dr. Harry Storch and
Prof. Karl Klgel. Thank you so much for believing in me and that is such a big
encouragement!
I am especially grateful to my dear friend Nigel Downes, who introduced me to this
course, for his supporting as always.
I would like to express a huge thanks to all of our Professors and Teachers for the lectures,
excursions and inspiration! Many thanks to the research group of Megacity HCMC project
for the knowledge I got from their workshops and discussions. Thank you all my friends
and the staffs at VGU for the assistance and for our memories during these last two years
together.
I also respectfully acknowledge Dr. Bui Van Nam Son for his devoted consultation.
This study cannot be done without the responses from more than two hundreds people all
over the world. I would like to thank you all, each and everyone! It was such an honor and
pleasure for me to read your various comments. Thank you very much too, my friends,
who had helped promote the survey through their blogs, websites and social networks.
My sympathy goes out to the interviewees in slum areas that I have talked to during the
field study in May. It was a unique and transformative experience. I really hope that life
will be better for you all.
Finally, I would like to take this chance to express the deepest gratitude and love from my
heart to my parents and beloved ones for their endless support and care. I know no words
would be enough...
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
4/95
4
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION 5
1.1 Rationale......................................................................................................................................5
1.2 Research aims .............................................. .................................................. .............................. 8
2. APPROACH & METHODOLOGY9
2.1 Backcasting and systems approach..............................................................................................9
2.2 Research methodology...............................................................................................................11
3. URBAN SUSTAINABILITY VISIONS14
Principles for Sustainability.............................................................................................................14
3.1 Ecological balance.....................................................................................................................20
City as a regenerative and symbiosis system...............................................................................20
Urban ecology and integrated land use....................................................................................23
Urban agriculture.....................................................................................................................24
3.2 Economic development .......................................... .................................................. ................. 26
Towards a low-carbon economy..................................................................................................26
Energy conservation and renewable energy ............................................... ............................. 28
ICT for low-carbon urban development .............................................. .................................... 30
3.3 Social connectedness and cultural vitality.................................................................................32
Social sustainability.....................................................................................................................33
Cultural sustainability..................................................................................................................35
Spiritual values .............................................. ................................................. ......................... 37
3.4 Good governance.......................................... ................................................. ............................ 38
4. URBAN SUSTAINABILITY & PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS42
4.1 Results from global online survey .......................................... ................................................. ..43
4.2 Results from surveys in HCMC.................................................................................................57
4.2.1 Results from online and offline questionnaires ............................................... ................... 57
4.2.2 Results from interviews in slum areas .............................................. .................................. 63
5. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION..66
5.1 Concluding remarks...................................................................................................................675.2 Recommendations for HCMC .......................................... .................................................. ....... 68
REFERENCES...... 70
APPENDIX I Sample of Global Online Survey..............................................................................75
APPENDIX II Sample of Survey in HCMC .......................................... ......................................... 78
APPENDIX III Semi-structure Interviews in Slum Areas of HCMC .......................................... ...85
APPENDIX IV Concept Notes for Sustainability Education..........................................................87
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
5/95
5
1. Introduction
If sustainable development does not start in the cities, it simply will not go.Cities have to lead the way. (Maurice Strong)1
1.1 Rationale
It is since 2008, for the first time in human history, more than half of the worlds
population now lives in cities. As urbanization continues to grow worldwide, to some
extent, we can say that the future of our world is the future of cities.
Urbanization has brought to us many benefits, especially in terms of economic and job
opportunities. As centers of communication, education, science, religion, commerce, and
political power, cities are hubs of innovations and great places for cultural and social
exchange. In terms of environment, the concentration of people and resources provides us
the advantages of energy efficiency and convenience in transportation, goods and services
delivering, as well as helps preserve biodiversity by reducing the stress on wildlife habitats
(Miller 2004).
As cradles of civilization, cities influences on culture and society have gone far beyond
their proportion of the total population (Cunningham et al 2003). In earlier time, there was
just a small percentage of population lived in urban areas, up to only 3% in 1800 and 13%
in 1900 (Bugliarello 2008). Then, together with population booming after World War II,
industrialization has rapidly boosted urban expansion around the globe. However, most of
these urbanizations, particularly those in developing countries, are more on quantity rather
than quality. In the international Sustainability Survey2
conducted by SustainAbility and
GlobalScan (2011), most of the experts think that urbanization is a positive for global
business, but a negative for society.
1Chair of the Rio Summit, 1992, quoted in Urban Sustainability in New Zealand: An Information Resource
for Urban Practitioners2
The Sustainability Survey uses research-driven, expert insights to explore solutions to the biggest
sustainability challenges, through ongoing engagement with more than 700 thought leaders from across
70+ countries and a variety of sectors (SustainAbility, GlobalScan 2011)
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
6/95
6
In fact, while cities bring many advantages, they are also the cause of many environmental
and social problems. Most of cities are not self-sustaining but must rely heavily on
external sources such as food from farms, timbers from forests, minerals from mines,
water from watersheds. Cities are big consuming clusters of materials and energy.
Although city dwellers occupy only about 2% of the Earths land area, they consume
about 75% of the Earths resources (Miller 2004).
The amount of waste outputs is even greater than the materials inputs because materials
combine with air or water in the process of being used. Current urban systems are typical
examples of the degenerative throughput pattern characterized by linear flows (Lyle
1994). Ultimately, while resources are being depleted, sinks become overloaded with huge
wastes far beyond their capacity to assimilate. This one-way throughput system, like most
man-made processes but unlike natures cycle flows, results in the twin consequences of
resource depletion and environmental degradation.
Under population and housing demand pressures, unplanned and uncontrolled
urbanization spontaneously occurs. In many of the cases, it is merely urban sprawl or
urban spreading into suburban areas, where it does not properly and fully function as
genuine urbanization, lacking of public services, causing loss of landscape, loss of
CITY
Food
Energy
Water
Goods
Materials
Waste
Pollution
Heat
Noise
INPUT Sources THROUGHPUT Processes OUTPUT Sinks
Figure 1.1 City as an open, linear and unsustainable system
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
7/95
7
farmlands. Sometimes, it is characterized by low density development, which is not energy
efficient in general, particularly in terms of transportation. And in other times, it is
characterized by too high density. Where physical (hard) and social (soft) infrastructure
developments do not keep pace with urban expansion and become overloaded, where
cities can not manage the excess unskilled labors, urbanization can create more slums,
shantytowns, unemployment, poverty, urban segregation.
On the other hand, man-made concrete buildings and asphalt roads absorb more heat,
altering microclimate and natural hydrological cycle, limiting rainwater infiltration which
can result in more urban flooding. The lack of nature in urban environment, lack of space
and stressful city life can cause negative impact to human psychology. Sometimes, the
hidden social problems related to industrialization and urbanization can be quite serious as
the linkages within communities and between tradition and culture have broken down.Social alienation, lack of public life, isolation, ultimately results in increased crime and
fear (Goldsmith 2000).
Since our economies and societies depend so much on fossil fuel, particularly oil, in the
context of peak oil3
and climate change, many urban issues such as energy consumption,
green house gas emission, urban flooding, transportation become more complex and
inextricable. Particularly, cities which stretch over flood plains or coast lines, are getting
more vulnerable to natural disasters as sea level rising.
So, nowadays, cities are facing many challenges on the path towards sustainability, given
that sustainability is an honor goal to pursuit, characterized by livability in a
comprehensive view. Urban development patterns can not be sustainable if in themselves
there are potential risks of breakdown and collapse due to any ecological imbalance,
inequitable distribution or social injustice. Unsustainable urban development, by default,
means that it can not go far and continue in the long run.
3The label for the problem of energy resource depletion, the day that oil production reaches a maximum
and will subsequently begin to decline.
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
8/95
8
1.2 Research aims
The fate of our cities is the fate of the Earth (Callenbach 1992). Unfortunately, most of
our urban development patterns nowadays are not sustainable. Hence, for our future to be
possible, we need creative visions of urban sustainability which must be very differentwith current reality.
Although urbanization causes many problems, urban densities also have in themselves
great potential for socio-economic innovation and opportunities, for compact and energy-
efficient development. Moreover, the dark sides of urbanization do not always have to
manifest, but rather they are often exacerbated by bad planning and governance4, low
public environmental and social awareness. Since awareness involves creating a shared
understanding of sustainability and a common sense of purpose among teams, institutions
and organizations, it is essential that everyone, especially those participates in the planning
process, has a common understanding of what sustainability is and why our current system
is not sustainable (Baxter et al. 2009). Therefore, building a holistic guiding framework
for urban sustainability, which can be used in urban governance, decision-making,
capacity building, education and public awareness raising is a critical key for a sustainable
future.
What makes a livable and sustainable city? How do people perceive urban sustainability?
How do people envision their dream cities? What matters the most for them? This thesis
seeks to find answers for these questions, from suggestions of experts, and by listening to
peoples voices, their hopes and dreams. Beside the international document research and
the global online survey, the case of public perception in Ho Chi Minh City was also
investigated.
4
Findings from the international Sustainability Survey (SustainAbility, GlobalScan 2011) suggest that, poor
city management, plus corruption are the greatest barriers to addressing urban issues.
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
9/95
9
2. Approach & Methodology
Success requires an understanding of the complex forces at work, a vision ofthe future and a strategy for making the vision a reality. (Edwards 2005)
2.1 Backcasting and systems approach
This thesis uses visionary (backcasting5) and holistic (systems) approach in dealing with
urban challenges and building the framework for sustainability. The concept of
backcasting is a way of planning which begins with the vision of what we want in the
future, and then goes back to the present, figures out what we have to do to get there.
Having first a desirable vision in mind is a powerful step to manifest it in reality. As
visions provide inspiration and guidance for decision-making towards sustainability, they
allow us to ensure that our actions and strategies aligned with the direction we want to
head and as efficiently as possible.
Since backcasting starts with the final end, the image of the desired outcome, it usually
refers to long time frames, where there is great uncertainty and less control over what may
happen. Hence, the future vision may usefully be defined using principles rather than
specifics (Outhwaite 2009). Backcasting does not describe for measurable and fixed
targets and goals, but rather for flexible, evolutionary and continuously re-created visions.
Backcasting is an opportunity to let go of the current reality for a moment and freely
imagine what might be possible (Outhwaite 2009). As forecasting mostly based on
current trend, it tends to present a more limited range of options, hence stifling creativity
and new possibilities, and more important, it projects the problems of today into the future.
When we start with problems, often the vision is limited to having fewer problems, or
solving an isolated problem; it does not necessarily encompass how we can satisfy ones
needs more effectively, or how we can live rich and meaningful lives (Hallsmith 2003).
As Albert Einstein once said the significant problems we face cannot be solved at the
same level of thinking we were at when we created them, backcasting is particularly
5The Natural Steps Backcasting: http://www.naturalstep.org/backcasting
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
10/95
10
useful when current trends are part of the problems that we are trying to tackle. Thus,
though forecasting is very effective if we are happy with current situation, if what we want
is a very different future than the one we are headed toward, that is when we need to
backcast (Baxter et al. 2009).
In brief, backcasting is looking at the current situation from a future perspective, which
allows complex problems to be approached by let us first simply focus on outcomes, then
think backwards to identify numerous potential pathways to reach the desired outcomes. In
turn, exploring many alternatives makes it easier to find solutions that best fit and optimize
all of the parts and relationships within the system toward achieving these outcomes
(Haines et al. 2005). Therefore, backcasting is a helpful methodology in planning for
urban sustainability because of the complexity of urban challenges and the need to develop
new ways of doing things to address them.
Backward thinking is the core of where to start in systems thinking, a systems view and
comprehensive approach that can help us to design smart and enduring solutions to
problems. Systems thinking is a holistic approach which encourages us to see the whole
- the bigger picture, so that we can structure more effective, efficient and creative system
solutions.
The systems view looks at the world in terms of relationships and integration, recognizing
the essential interrelatedness and interdependence of all phenomena physical, biological,
psychological, social, and cultural (Capra 1988). In order to understand whats behind
our sustainability challenges, we need to step back and look at the big picture, see the
connections, identify the root causes of our problems and find the leverage points for
change (Baxter et al. 2009).
Systems approach attempts to widen the circle of understanding in order to comprehend
the connections that exist between all things in the web of life. It is a continuing process
that involves honoring the past, being present, looking ahead, and keeping future
generations in mind (Newman and Jennings 2008). Identifying cause and effect
relationships requires us to see not only bigger but deeper, further in all dimensions of
space and time. The following quote by Grazia is a beautiful metaphor on contemplation
through longer time frames to recognize patterns: Imagine you want to shoot an arrow.
The further back you pull the bowstring, the further the arrow flies. The same is true for
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
11/95
11
our own understanding and vision. The further back we look into history, the further we
can see into our future (Grazia 2009).
The holistic approach towards sustainable urban development is a strategic thinking to
address the complex challenges of our urban issues. Thus, urban sustainability visions
should encompass an integrated and interdisciplinary framework in which cities are
considered as parts of larger natural ecosystems and socio-economic communities.
2.2 Research methodology
Three research methods were used in this thesis: document research, questionnaire (online
and offline), and semi-structure interviews (fig. 2.1).
The thesis starts first with international document research to seek for experts views and
ideas on urban sustainability, the principles and ingredients of a sustainable city, as well as
some suggested models and good practices. The materials came from various resources:
books, specialists websites, articles, and experts blogs.
Figure 2.1 Thesis methodology flowchart
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
12/95
12
The results from this document research stage are summarized in chapter 3. Some main
ideas from the experts visions on urban sustainability were used to design the
questionnaires for the surveys of public perceptions. Samples of these questionnaires are
attached in the annex (appendix I, II and III). Results from these surveys are presented and
discussed in chapter 4. The purposes of these questionnaires are assessment of public
perceptions/awareness on some aspects of urban sustainability, as well as testing publics
responses on some sustainable urban development models. Then, the results from these
surveys can be considered in making public awareness raising programs, as well as public
opinions can be integrated in the framework for urban sustainability.
Table 2.1 Research questions & methodology
Main Research Questions
Methodology
DocumentResearch
QuestionnaireInterviewOnline
Survey
Offline
Survey
How do experts envision a sustainable city?
What make a sustainable city?
How do people envision their desirable cities?
What are their perceptions on urban
sustainability?
Among many aspects of urban development,what matter most to them?
Global
HCMC HCMCs
slum
dwellers
What are public perceptions on current urban
development in HCMC?
HCMC
The surveys of public perceptions on urban sustainability were conducted online globally
(in English), and both online and offline for citizens in Ho Chi Minh City (in Vietnamese).
The free Google Docs Form was used in designing the online surveys.
The global online survey in English was launched in May of 2011 at this link:
https://sites.google.com/site/sustainabilityvision/urban-survey
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
13/95
13
Then, it has been promoted by posting on websites, social networks, blogs and mail groups
such as Wiser Earth, Facebook, YES Alumni, ERM, Scribd
Also in late May of 2011, the other survey with target groups of Ho Chi Minh City
citizens was launched both online and offline (distributed in papers) in Vietnamese. The
translated English version of this survey for Ho Chi Minh City is available in the website
as well as in the appendix:
https://sites.google.com/site/sustainabilityvision/urban-survey/survey-for-
hcmc/vietnamese-version (Vietnamese origin)
https://sites.google.com/site/sustainabilityvision/urban-survey/survey-for-hcmc
(English, translated version)
In addition, the fieldwork study in some slum areas, especially those along the polluted
canals in district 4 and district 8 of Ho Chi Minh City, with observations and interviews of
slum dwellers, had been conducted in May 2011. Since most of slum dwellers are
powerless and poor, their voices are often left unheard while they are the most vulnerable
to the disadvantages of urbanization. The questions asked to people in slum areas must be
modified to be appropriate in their specific contexts and situations (appendix III). Mostly,
the main purpose of this fieldwork is to get the real picture of the urban poor lives, and to
listen to their wishes.
Figure 2.2 Locations of the fieldwork study at slum areas in Ho Chi Minh City
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
14/95
14
3. Urban Sustainability Visions
Vision is seeing the potential purpose hidden in the chaos of the moment, but
which could bring to birth new possibilities for a person, a company or a nation.
Vision is seeing what life could be like while dealing with life as it is.
Vision deals with those deeper human intangibles that alone give ultimate purpose to
life. In the end, vision must always deal with lifes qualities, not with its quantities.
(Van Duisen Wilhard)6
Principles for Sustainability
Sustainability literally means the capacity to endure over time. Symbolically, it refers to
what is of true values, what is good, genuine and resilient, which can stand the test of time.
Sustainability associates with balance and equity in a comprehensive approach, which
acknowledges our dependence on the health of natural systems for our survival and well-
being, the limit carrying capacity of the Earth and the detrimental impact of unchecked
human activities (Edwards 2005). Thus, sustainability strives for balance among the
interconnected ecological, economic and social systems. As implied from the most popular
definition of sustainable development7
(the Brundtland report 1987), sustainability
requires a long term, intergenerational perspective. Equity should be maintained, not only
across communities within generation but also between generations.
The Earth Charter is a global consensus, a product of a decade-long, worldwide, cross-
cultural dialogue on common goals and shared values. As a vision of hope and a call to
action, it provides us with inspiration and guidance to a sustainable future. In October
2003, UNESCO adopted a resolution recognizing the Earth Charter as an important ethical
framework for sustainability (ECI Secretariat 2011). Main principles of the Earth Charter
are summarized in the following box 3.1.
6
Quoted in Beyond You and Me - Inspirations and Wisdom for Building Community, Robin Alfred &
Kosha Anja Joubert (Ed.), Gaia Education - Permanent Publications 20077
Our Common Future, the report by World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED 1987):
Sustainable development is development which meets the needs of the present without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
15/95
15
Box 3.1 The Earth Charter - values and principles for a sustainable future8
THE EARTH CHARTERS PRINCIPLES
Respect and Care for t he Com m unity of Life:
To respect Earth and life in all its diversity;
To care for the community of life with understanding, compassion and love;
To build democratic societies that are just, sustainable, participatory and peaceful; and
To secure Earth's bounty and beauty for present and future generations.
In order to fulfill these four broad commitments, it is necessary to:
Ecological Integrity
Protect and restore the integrity of Earth's ecological systems, with special concernfor biological diversity and the natural processes that sustain life.
Prevent harm as the best method of environmental protection and, when knowledgeis limited, apply a precautionary approach.
Adopt patterns of production, consumption, and reproduction that safeguard Earth's
regenerative capacities, human rights, and community well-being.
Advance the study of ecological sustainability and promote the open exchange and
wide application of the knowledge acquired.
Social and Economic Just ice
Eradicate poverty as an ethical, social, and environmental imperative.
Ensure that economic activities and institutions at all levels promote human
development in an equitable and sustainable manner.
Affirm gender equality and equity as prerequisites to sustainable development andensure universal access to education, health care, and economic opportunity.
Uphold the right of all, without discrimination, to a natural and social environment
supportive of human dignity, bodily health, and spiritual well-being, with special attention to
the rights of indigenous peoples and minorities.
Democracy, Nonviolence, and Peace
Strengthen democratic institutions at all levels, and provide transparency and
accountability in governance, inclusive participation in decision making, and access to
justice.
Integrate into formal education and life-long learning the knowledge, values, and
skills needed for a sustainable way of life.
Treat all living beings with respect and consideration.
Promote a culture of tolerance, nonviolence, and peace.
8
Full version of the Earth Charter and more at www.earthcharterinaction.org
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
16/95
16
The spirit of the Earth Charter is beautifully highlighted in the core principle of Respect
and Care for the Community of Life: respect Earth and life in all its diversity, care for the
community of life with understanding, compassion and love. It helps us to recognize what
is deeply and fundamentally important to us our connection with each other and with the
natural world. That holistic worldview leads us to do no harm and cooperate with nature,
with all other humans and other living beings in the web of life.
One Planet Living9 is a global initiative developed by BioRegional10 and WWF11. While
the Earth Charter is an ethical framework, the One Planet Livings sustainable city
concepts are more of a practical vision that helps us to focus on how we can take action
for a sustainable future.
Box 3.2 The Ten Principles of One Planet Living (BioRegional and WWF)
9
One Planet Living: http://www.oneplanetliving.org/index.html10
BioRegional Solutions for Sustainability: http://www.bioregional.com11
World Wildlife Fund: http://www.wwf.org
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
17/95
17
The Philips Centers framework for Livable Cities - In the urban context, sustainability
can be perceived as visions of livable and lovable cities (The Philips Center for Health &
Wellbeing 2010). Experts from the Philips Center have identified three important
interlinked ingredients of a livable city: resilience, inclusiveness and authenticity (fig. 3.1
and box 3.3).
In their conceptual framework for urban sustainability, think tank of the Philips Center
pointed out that these three essential attributes of a livable city should present in all
dimensions of sustainability (social, cultural, economic, technical and environmental).
So, a livable city should be a resilient city, environmentally, socially and economically;
this is particularly true in the growing context of climate change, as resilience is about
Figure 3.1 The Philips Centers Visualization Framework for Livable Cities
(adapted from The Philips Center for Health & Well-being 2010)
ECOSYSTEM (environmental dimension)
SOCIETY (socio-cultural, economic & technical dimensions)
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
18/95
18
adaptability, flexibility, the ability of a city to balance continuity with change. A resilient
city is a strong city which has inner strength to help it remain stable through shocks and
stresses. A livable city is also an inclusive city, which cherishes social integration and
cohesion. Moreover, a livable as well as lovable city usually has its own unique identity.
Box 3.3 Three important interlinked ingredients of a livable city12
VISION OF A LIVABLE & LOVABLE CITY
(The Philips Center 2010)
Resilience
Preservation of biodiversity and ecosystems for local environmental quality
Energy, food, water, materials at low global ecological footprint
Green areas and water as environmental mitigation factors, parks as lungs of a city
Cultural diversity, multiple lifestyle, continuity and change, tradition and innovation
Adaptability, regeneration, transformation, interdependency, systems view
Economic diversity, local entrepreneurship, job creation
Inclusiveness
Public green areas as outdoor gyms, recreational spaces, social bridges
Empowerment, justice and freedom
Equitable access to resources, rights to public goods and services
Social participation, economic inclusion
Cultural diversity and integration, toleranceSense of ownership, security and safety
Authenticity
Local ecosystem for local identity, native species as uniqueness of a place
Natural heritage as collective memory
Connection between people and nature
Historical heritage and identity
Valuable local knowledge and culture
Appropriate innovation and choices of change
Cultural and technological rootedness
Sense of place, belonging and pride
Connection between people and people, people and land
12
First edition of the Insight Series on Livable Cities (The Philips Center, 2010)
http://www.philips-thecenter.org/livable-cities/recent-activity/2011/Insight-1-on-Livable-Cities
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
19/95
Ecocity - Figure 3.2 feature
experts of Ecocity Builders13
building, and operations in re
of the region (Ecocity Builder
Figu
The following parts of this
urban sustainability, in terms
development, social cohesion
development.
13
Ecocity Buillders: http://www.ec
City of
qualified
density
City of hu
scales a
urbani
City with new
balance ofconcentration and
decentralization
City
d
City as
network of
urban quarters
City int
the surro
City of
balanced
mixed use
City of
minimized land
consumption
City fo
publi
City of
accessibility for
everyone
City wi
public sp
for daily
EC
19
s main characteristics of an ecocity model e
, using integrated, whole systems approach fo
lation to the surrounding environment and nat
s 2010).
e 3.2 Principal features of an ecocity
(adapted from Ecocity Builders)
chapter will discuss briefly more concepts an
of its interrelated dimensions, ecological balan
, cultural vitality and good governance for sust
citybuilders.org
s
man
nd
y
City for strong
local economy
City of cultural
identity and
social diversity
Cit
s
of concentrating
evelopment atsuitable sites
City integrated in
globalcommunication
networks
Ci
m
the
egrated into
unding region
City as power station
of renewable energies
Ci
City of minimized
energy
consumption
City c
to cl
pedestrians,
yclists,
c transport
City of reduction,
reuse, recycle of
waste
h
ace
life
City
in balance
with nature
City with
integrated
green areas
CITY
nvisioned by
r city design,
ral resources
d models for
ce, economic
ainable urban
City of
ustainable
lifestyle
y of health,
afety andell-being
y built and
naged with
inhabitants
ity of short
distances
ontributing
sed water
cycle
City of
ioclimatic
comfort
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
20/95
20
3.1 Ecological balance
Cities can become more sustainable by modeling urban processes on ecological
principles of form and function, by which natural ecosystems operate. The
characteristics of natural ecosystems include diversity, adaptiveness,interconnectedness, resilience, regenerative capacity, and symbiosis. (Newman and
Jennings 2008)
City as a regenerative and symbiosis system
The core philosophy of sustainability lies in the appreciation of nature as the symbol of
integrity, stability and beauty. Sustainability deals much with creative designs and
planning in harmony with nature. From the perspective of sustainability, natures design
and technologies are far superior to human science and technology (Sterry 2010).
Figure 3.3 City as a regenerative system with circular metabolism
INPUT (Sources)
Reduced Consumption and
Increased Efficiency
THROUGHPUT
(Processes)
OUTPUT (Sinks)
Reduced Pollution & Waste
RenewableResources
Renewable
Energy
Regenerative
Water
Waste
PollutionCITY
Recycle
organic wastes
Recycled
materials, water
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
21/95
21
In nature, nothing is useless, nothing is waste but everything is resource for other process
in the sophisticatedly interconnected web of life, where circular metabolism is the
principle of ongoing self-renewal system. Thus, a sustainable system is a regenerative
system that mimics natures circular patterns, replacing the present linear flows (fig.1.1)
with cyclical flows (fig.3.3).
On a predominantly urban planet, cities will need to adopt circular metabolic systems to
assure their own long-term viability as well as that of the rural environments on which
they depend; outputs will need to become inputs into the local and regional production
system (Girardet 2010). Most importantly, it is crucial to return organic waste into plant
nutrients, for assuring farmlands long-term fertility. By recycling wastes back into the
system, it also minimizes pollution. Sustainably using renewable resources, instead of
fossil fuels and chemicals is also more resource-conserving, healthy and lessenvironmentally damaging.
On the other hand, creating a circular urban metabolism can create resilient cities and
create many new local businesses and jobs (Girardet 2010). About resilience, Melissa
Sterry is developing the model of Bionic City14
, which embraces natures approach to
building complex infrastructures: Whereas the conventional city is a mass of static,
disconnected and inert structures operating independently and irrespective of one another
and their environment, the Bionic City operates as an interconnected and intelligent
ecosystem in which every entity is engaged in an ongoing symbiotic relationship with all
others, from the molecular to the metropolitan in scale. Beyond preventing the problems
traditionally associated with flooding, the Bionic City will also feature the means to utilise
excessive quantities of water, including hydropower and water harvesting technologies.
According to Melissa Sterry, the sensitivity the city has with its surroundings is key to its
ability to predict and prepare for environmental changes.
One essential characteristic of nature systems that helps maintaining stability in constantly
changing conditions is diversity (Holmgren 2002). Multiple associations nurture each life
form, thereby increasing the stability and resilience of the whole system. In natural
system, everything is connected to everything else, each important function is supported
by many elements, and each element performs many functions. Thus, this provides the
14Bionic City- article on Earth 2.0 magazine: http://earth2channel.com/magazine/article/22
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
22/95
22
thinking of multiple pathways to achieve one goal as well as a common solution to
disparate problems (Lyle 1994). For instance, rainwater infiltration with thoughtful design
can replenish groundwater, create landscape, as well as reduce urban flooding
The idea of solving problems simultaneously is also the main theme of SymbioCity15
, an
urban sustainability approach by Sweden. Symbiosis means the integration of two or more
organisms in a mutually beneficial union. Looking at the city as a whole, we find benefits
through synergies in urban functions such as combination of industrial waste heat with the
municipal energy plant, combination of architecture and landscape planning
It takes more than one petal to make a flower. SymbioCity means urban resource
efficiency across and between different urban technological systems, letting nothing goto waste; combining energy, waste management, water supply and sanitation, traffic and
transport, landscape planning, architecture and urban functions for new and better
solutions as well as a more efficient use of natural resource (SymbioCity 2009).
15
More on SymbioCity: http://www.symbiocity.org
Figure 3.4 Building blocks of SymbioCity a holistic and integrated approach for sustainable urban development
(adapted from SymbioCity)
Urban functions
(housing,
industries,
services
Waste
management
Energy
Landscape
planning
Architecture &
master planning
Traffic &
transport
Water supply
& sanitation
SymbioCity
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
23/95
23
There are many ways to make an urban function effective, but focusing on them
individually may let us miss out the synergies between them, which can only be found
with a holistic approach. Therefore, an integrated planning approach is key to unlocking
hidden synergies in the city. Instead of managing urban sectors one by one, SymbioCity
combine them, saving valuable city resources and creating new values (SymbioCity 2009).
Urban ecology and integrated land use
As the spirit of sustainability lies in the heart of nature, protecting and restoring ecology
within urban areas, bringing nature back into city is an essential theme in urban
sustainability. Green spaces in cities offer us a lot of benefits. They provide shading,
filtering the air, enriching urban biodiversity, reducing urban heat island effect, thus
simultaneously making bioclimate comfort and lowering energy use for cooling. Urban
ecology uses climate- and region-appropriate plants, xeriscaping16 to minimize the need
for fertilizer and water, and uses land for multiple functions such as food production,
wildlife habitat, recreation and beautification (Roseland 2005). Urban ecology also
acknowledges the role of water and urban aquatic systems streams, ponds, rivers in
revitalizing cities. Besides those ecological advantages, thoughtful urban designs in
concert with nature and embracing culture of a place also have many aesthetic values,
social and psychological healing benefits. Green public spaces can enhance community
connection and interaction, providing places to contemplate, play, relax and meditate.
Since land use permeates nearly all urban aspects, appropriate land use is a decisive factor
for a sustainable city. In order to be sustainable, city should minimize land consumption,
integrating green spaces and preserving farm land for food security as well as for other
ecological functions. It is not always easy as land is a limited resource and the cost of real
estates is often too high, while cities have to balance among conflicts of urbanization,
development, population pressure with environmental and social goals. Therefore,
symbiosis integrating planning or whole systems design17
for multi-purpose use can help
afford this balance. Many examples illustrate this concept (Roseland 2005): green roof,
solar photovoltaic panel on rooftop (no extra space needed); parks, urban gardening as
16Xeriscaping refers to landscaping and gardening in ways that reduce or eliminate the need for
supplemental water from irrigation17
Whole systems design concept for sustainability: http://www.wholesystemsdesign.com
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
24/95
both recreation areas and edi
facility, natural habitats, recre
Urban agriculture
Urban agriculture or urban fa
Urban agriculture is a dyna
ranging from subsistence
commercialized agriculture (
In response to serious pr
degradation, there is a grow
world, along with the mov
Increasingly, urban farming h
Ecological
Environmental healt
Greening urban lan
Urban biodivers
Improved microcli
Reduced ecological f
Waste recyclin
Recreation & leis
Figure 3.5 Urban ag
24
ble landscaping; constructed wetlands as sew
ation areas, drainage for rainwater run off
ming can be understood as farming within and
ic concept that comprises of a variety of far
roduction and processing at household le
Zeeuw et al. n.d.).
blems of poverty, food insecurity, and e
ing attention and promotion of urban farming
ement of resilient, self-sustaining and low
as been seen as part of sustainable urban develo
Urban
Farming
Social
Food secure & inclusive city
Food security & nutrition
Poverty alleviation
Social inclusion
Community building
Economic
Productive cityIncome generation
Local economic develop
Emloyment generatio
hy city
scape
ity
ate
otprint
g
ure
iculture as a tool for sustainable urban develop
(adapted from Zeeuw)
age treatment
around cities.
ing systems,
vel to fully
nvironmental
all over the
arbon cities.
pment.
ent
ent
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
25/95
25
Urban farming can contribute to a food secure and inclusive city, a productive and
environmentally healthy city (fig. 3.5). Therefore, it is necessary to acknowledge the links
between urban agriculture and various policy target areas, such as the alleviation of
poverty, economic development, or environmental protection, in order to justify the
inclusion and mainstreaming of urban agriculture into municipal policies and public
support programs (Zeeuw et al. n.d.).
The most striking feature of urban farming, which distinguishes it from rural agriculture, is
its integration into the urban economic and ecological system (RUAF)18
. Urban farms and
gardens complement rural agriculture in local food systems and can also become an
important income supplement for households. Since food production is close to home and
market, it helps reduce energy for transportation and packaging costs. This is also helpful
in situations when supply chains from rural areas have been interrupted and cities areunable to receive food imports (Worldwatch 2011). Another essential benefit of urban
agriculture is that it can contribute to waste management and nutrient recycling by turning
urban wastes into a productive resource, thus reducing the use of expensive chemical
fertilizers and improving local soil fertility (Veenhuizen and Danso 2007).
In his theory of Food Urbanism (2009), Jason Grimm showed that urban food system of
production, processing, distribution, marketing, consumption and waste management can
become infrastructure that transforms urban experience by thoughtful sensitive design and
planning. According to Grimm, food production can be integrated into the daily activities
of community residents through recreation and communal gatherings. Community gardens
can also provide beautiful and pleasing spaces, helping improve the air quality in urban
areas. And through cooperative market outlets, a larger series of food access points can be
developed, supplying healthy fresh and affordable food.
18
RUAF Resource Centres on Urban Agriculture & Food Security: What is urban agriculture?
http://www.ruaf.org/node/512
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
26/95
26
3.2 Economic development
To break dependence on oil, stop contributing to global warming, and build
resilient cities that can thrive in the new urban age of energy and climate uncertainty,
the bottom line for local governments is this: Reduce consumption, and producelocally. (Lerch 2009)
Towards a low-carbon economy
We are in the time of Peak Oil, and the time of cheap oil will end soon (Kuhlman 2007).
Many experts have been warning about the end of our civilization as we know it is today19
,
the end of oil age with its catastrophic consequences20
. The world economy heavily
depended on high-carbon fossil fuel is eventually coming into crisis as these fuels go
exhausted. Moreover, the problem is not only the depletion of oil, but also many
environmental, political and socio-economic issues related, especially the green house
effect that leads to global climate change. Thus, we need a thoughtful vision, a shift to new
models of development that are more sustainable, a green economy based on climate
friendly low-carbon energy.
The concept of Zero carbon, one of the One Planet Livings ten principles (box 3.2)
which aims at making building more energy efficient and delivering all energy with
renewable technologies, is being developed at the Masdar initiative21. The European
Union22
is making real efforts to reduce green gas emissions with their Roadmap for
moving to a low-carbon economy in 2050. More and more, there is a growing trend of
transition to low-carbon city or post carbon city city on a path of resilience for a world
of energy and climate uncertainty (Lerch 2009).
The Japanese Ministry of Environment has pointed out three principles for a low-carbon
society: (1) Carbon minimization in all sectors, (2) Shifting from mass consumption
society toward simpler lifestyles that realize richer quality of life, (3) Coexistence with
Nature - maintaining and restoring natural environment that essential for low-carbon
19Life after the oil crash: http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/Politics/Articles/LifeAfterOilCrash.htm
20The Olduvai theory and catastrophic consequences: http://www.energybulletin.net/node/45518
21Zero carbon city Masdar initiative: http://www.masdar.ae/en/home/index.aspx
22EU, March 2011: Roadmap for moving to a low-carbon economy in 2050
http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/roadmap/index_en.htm
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
27/95
27
society (Ministry of Environment - Japan 2007). Thus, building a low-carbon city requires
the efforts and active involvement of whole social system.
Figure 3.6 Benefits of a low-carbon transport system
(based on the CATCH23
factsheet series)
*ITS: Intelligent Transport System, applied ITC in smart logistics
Though Peak Oil can conceive quite catastrophic potential, it also opens some hopeful
possibilities, a chance to address many underlying social problems, and the opportunity to
return to simpler, healthier and more community oriented lifestyle (Kuhlman 2007). The
example of Cuba can serve as a positive and instructive model for a world facing Peak
Oil24
. Cuba is the only country that has faced such a crisis the massive reduction of fossil
fuels, after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990. Cuba's transition to a low-energy society
has taken place by creating cycling culture, sharing public transportation and turning from
a mechanized, industrial agricultural system to one using organic methods of farming and
local, urban gardens. Lesson from Cubas survival gives us hope in the power of
23CATCH (Carbon Aware Travel Choice) is an EU project with the ultimate aim to reduce CO2 emissions of
the urban transport sector by encouraging carbon-friendly travel choices. http://www.carbonaware.eu24
See more: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil (Documentary), Arthur Morgan
Institute for Community Solutions (2006): http://www.communitysolution.org
More lively urban
neighborhoods
Better neighborhood
accessibility
More efficient in terms
of energy/cost/time
Higher
security
More social
interaction
Social
equity
Better
health
Safer
roads
Less
congestion
More walking
& cycling
More public
transport
Use of
ITS*
Less private
vehicles
Less noise &
air pollution
Low-carbon
Transport System
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
28/95
28
community, and the effectiveness of their strategies, which can be summarize in three
words: curtailment, conservation and cooperation25
.
The guidance for low-carbon city development focuses on three key sectors of
transportation & urban structure, energy and greenery (Kamata 2011). As discussed in the
previous part, conservation of green spaces, farmland and urban greenery is essential as
carbon sinks for the city. Besides, shifting from urban sprawl and diffusive urban structure
to compact urban development is encouraged. Compact city in harmony with nature is an
urban model that consists of station-centered communities with a mix of houses, stores,
offices, and convenient facilities accessible mainly by public transportation, on foot, or by
bicycle (City of Nagoya 2009). Many benefits of a low-carbon transport system are
illustrated in figure 3.6.
Public transportation is key for low-carbon city; together with policies to support local
consumption of goods produced locally (Ecologist 2008). Many policies available to
alleviate energy insecurity can also help to mitigate local pollution and climate change, as
a triple-win outcome (IEA 2007). For examples, development in public transportation
does not only conserve energy, but also relieve congestion, improve air quality, provide
access for all (APTA 2008).
Energy conservation and renewable energy
In dealing with the energy issue, the first and foremost available strategy is energy
conservation, through reducing energy waste and increasing energy efficiency. We should
recognize the fact that in the mean time alternative energies can not replace fossil fuels at
the scale, rate and manner at which the world currently consumes them. Moreover, the
deepest roots of our current energy crisis lie on the patterns of wasteful production and
consumption (Capra 1988). Therefore, what truly matters is profound change in our
values, attitudes and lifestyle. Energy conservation is our short-term key energy source
and will always be a good solution in the long run too.
Energy conservation brings many benefits. It is low cost and available at all levels. Using
less energy resource also means reducing pollution and environmental degradation, while
25See more: Peak Moment TV program (2006) Learning from Cuba response to Peak Oil, interviewing
Megan Quinn. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7i6roVB5MI
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
29/95
29
prolong fossil fuel supplies and buying time to phase in renewable energy. Saving energy
can start just right at each individuals lifestyle. For examples: buy and use energy-
efficient devices, look for electronics that are rechargeable, walk or cycle for short trips,
consider car-pooling or take public transport for longer ones, eat lower on the food chains,
buy regionally and seasonally produced organic food whenever possible26
The list goes
on, and every bit can help.
Many measures can also be done on the technical sphere, where there is a lot of space for
creative innovations. In housing, remarkable energy-saving can be achieved by improved
heat insulation or green building design which takes advantages of natural elements like
sun, wind, plants, trees, green-roofs instead of using air conditioning. Many intelligent
lighting systems with energy-saving sensors have become widely used for hotels, official
buildings. In transportation, energy-saving techniques can be attained through increasingfuel efficiency. In industry, the idea of co-generation, producing both heat and electricity
from one energy source can be well applied.
Eventually, we will use up non-renewable energy resources. From a long-term point of
view, renewable ones are what we should rely on. The Sun shines for all of us, and the
wind blows, free of charge. Although the equipments to collect solar and wind energy,
such as solar panels and wind turbines cost money, when considering that the resource is
taking for free, the overall cost of using solar and wind energy can make them smart
choices. Renewable technology cost trends typically show a steep decline during last
decades (NREL 2002), and that trends will continue to reach reasonable levels in the
future as their markets expansion. Moreover, renewable energy are often clean, such as
wind and sunshine, they do not emit smoke or create pollution. Others, such as biomass,
almost always cause less pollution than fossil or nuclear alternatives.
Renewable energies would bring a number of benefits to the economy. First, they help
increase the diversity of energy supplies, and thus lower the dependency on imported
fossil fuels and improve the security of energy supplies. Second, they help make use of
local resources to provide a cost-effective energy supply while reducing regional and
global greenhouse gas emissions. Since they are often flexible, small-scale designs, which
26See more in the article on The Ecologist Magazine: 30 steps to an oil free world
http://www.theecologist.org/how_to_make_a_difference/climate_change_and_energy/360427/30_steps
_to_an_oilfree_world.html
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
30/95
30
take the advantages of local conditions, they can be located close to the demand. Then,
transmission and distribution costs are reduced, as well as losses. Finally, from the social
point of view, renewable energies can create more domestic employment. Such benefits
have created a strong motivation for pursuing renewable energies. The investment costs of
renewable technologies have been reduced remarkably today and this makes renewable
energies more attractive, quickly developed and expanded (Nguyen 2005).
Future will belong to the age of Renewable Sources. It is also the scenario described in the
Energy [R]evolution report, by the European Renewable Energy Council and Greenpeace
(2007). The vision would be made by optimized integration of renewable energy,
developing smart consumption, generation and distribution systems and maximizing the
efficiency of building through better insulation. Solar faade would be a decorative
element on office and apartment buildings. Rooftop wind and solar would be placed sothat energy is generated close to the consumer. Clean electricity would also come from
offshore wind parks or solar power station in deserts. Electricity would be much more
prominent and become the principal source of energy for transportation, replacing gasoline
and diesel fuels. Hydrogen can become a way of back-up to store solar, wind energy to use
at night or during cloudy days (EREC & Green Peace 2007).
Shifting to low-carbon economy means shifting to more diversified systems which
maximize the use of locally available, environmental friendly resources. It is encouraging
to know that we now have the technologies to build a new energy economy, one that is not
climate-disruptive, that does not pollute air and that can last as long as the sun itself
(Brown 2008).
ICT for low-carbon urban development
From mobile phone, computer, software to internet, information and communications
technology (ICT) has become integrated in our everyday life and remarkably influenced
our society in many levels. Recently, ICTs enormous potential in contributing towards a
low-carbon society has been recognized and getting more and more attention. Using high
technology, optical fiber, ultra-high speed, ultra-low power consumption network, nearly
the most energy-efficient infrastructure, ICT can lead to smarter ways of doing and
significantly reduce carbon footprint in cities (Yamakawa 2008). Efficiency of production
and consumption can be improved. Movement of people and things can be reduced
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
31/95
31
through online shopping, e-service, online media, teleworking, virtual meeting. ICT can
also support smart and integrated city planning, environmental management, urban
monitoring.
Figure 3.7 ICT applications for a low-carbon city
ICT can play crucial role in helping to improve energy efficiency in power transmission
and distribution (smart grids), in smart buildings and factories, and in the use of
transportation to deliver goods (smart logistics). They can also help in dematerialization27
and shifting to a circular economy, where resources are efficiently used (WWF & Ericsson
2009).
27Dematerialisation can be applied to a range of current everyday practices and ultimately reduce the
number of material objects that need to be produced. For example, online billing, online media replace
paper and CDs, thus reduce the emissions associated with their manufacture and distribution (GeSI 2008).
SMART
&
CONNECTED
CITY
E-Government
E-Commerce
E-Health
E-Services
OnlineMedia
SmartLogistics
SmartBuildings
Smart Grids
Teleworking
Paperlessoffice
E-learning
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
32/95
32
3.3 Social connectedness and cultural vitality
When you are connected to yourself, you live with integrity you act on your
values and you are committed to truth and honesty. When you are connected to others,
you commit to living in community, to caring for the common good, and to working forequality, justice and democracy. You commit to living joyfully with family, friends and
the wider community. When you are connected to the planet, you try to live more
sustainably, not using up or destroying nature. (Andrews 2006)
If the definition of a sustainable society involves meeting human needs, it is worth asking
what human needs are, and whether or not the system we are designing meets real human
needs in a synergistic and positively reinforcing way (Holocene 2004). According to
Manfred Max-Neef
28
, most of our needs are related to the social (protection, affection,understanding, participation) and cultural (recreation, creation, identity) aspects of life.
Once the basic need for subsistence has been met, the fundamental human needs are
understood as an interrelated and interactive system, not as a hierarchy as postulated by
Maslow29
(Hallsmith 2003). It was also reflected in the core principle of the Earth Charter
Respect and Care for the community of life: to care for the community of life with
understanding, compassion and love; to build democratic societies that are just,
sustainable, participatory and peaceful.
Social and cultural sustainability has been considered as soft infrastructure which is vital
for a healthy community. The social and cultural intertwined dimensions of urban
sustainability embrace vision of a humane society, where compassion, mutual respect and
care are nurtured, where sharing30
and cooperation become a celebrated social priority31
.
Where social capital is strong, communities exhibit high rates of volunteerism and citizen
involvement as well as greater inclusion of all sectors of society in the social and cultural
fabric. Also, a community that is rich in social capital provides a wealth of intelligence,
28Manfred Max-Neef: a German-Chilean economist and environmentalist, mainly known for his human
development model29
Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a theory in psychology, proposed by Abraham Maslow30
10 ways our wolrd is becoming more shareable (Gorenflo & Smith 2010)
http://www.yesmagazine.org/happiness/10-ways-our-world-is-becoming-more-shareable31
Earth 2.0 Sharing as one of the four chief operating principles of the Earth 2.0 upgrade
http://earth2channel.com/blog/post/28
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
33/95
33
sensitivity, and wisdom that will underpin and support appropriate ecological, economic,
and social sustainability strategies (Kingston 2010).
Figure 3.8 Social and cultural intertwined dimensions of urban sustainability
Social sustainability
According to the WACOSSs model, socially sustainable communities are equitable,
diverse, connected, democratic and provide a good quality of life (Hodgson 2008). So, a
sustainable city is a just and inclusive city, where benefits of development would be
distributed fairly across society. It is a city for all, regardless of their status, gender, race,
ethnicity or religion. An inclusive city provides the opportunities and support that enables
all residents to develop fully and allow them access to decent housing, transport,
education, recreation, communication, employment and the judiciary, as well as cultural
and religious expression. In an inclusive city, residents take part in decision-making that
Cultural Capital
Traditions
Ethics
Arts & Creativity
RecreationHistory & heritage
Custom & lifestyle
Spiritual values
Sense of Place
Social Capital Equity
Social networks Inclusiveness
Shared knowledge Diversity& Tolerance
Understandings Compassion& Love
Mutual trust Care& Supporting
Connectedness Sharing
Social cohesion Peace& Security
Solidarity Democracy
Sense of Community Sense of Belonging
PUBLIC SPACE
Communication
Participation
Interaction
Empowerment
Adequate &
affordable housing
Health & child care
Volunteerism
Community gardens
Life-long education
Common houses
Festivals
Community celebration
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
34/95
34
ranges from the political to issues of daily life. Such participation injects a sense of
belonging, identity, place into residents, and guarantees them a stake in the benefits of
urban development (UN-HABITAT 2010).
In an inclusive city, diversity is respected; people are tolerant of differences, and are open-
minded. This creates condition for true communication can develop. Communication leads
to trust, trust to sharing, sharing to co-operation and thus community solidarity is
strengthened.
As human beings, we all need meaningful relationships with others, the sense of
community, the sense of connectedness, knowing that another person cares, supports and
looks out for us. This corresponds with Maslows need for love/belonging and Max-Neefs
need for affection and participation. People with a strong sense of community are more
likely to report being in good health and less likely to feel isolated than those that have a
weak sense of community (Jochmann 2010).
Research has shown that communities where there are high levels of volunteerism and
many opportunities for people to have contact with others outside of work or school have
more consensus and are more resilient (Hallsmith 2003). Thus, public spaces in city are
very important for communication, interaction and exchange to build sense of community.
Jan Gehl32
once said, a sustainable city would be a very people-friendly city. It would be
a city with good public spaces and a city that is rather compact. It would be a city that
really invites people to walk and bicycle as much as possible. Research also confirmed
that individuals in more walkable neighborhoods tended to have higher levels of trust and
community involvement, and also reported being in good health and happy more often
than those in the less walkable neighborhoods (Williams 2011).
32
Jan Gelh Interview (2008): Making healthy cities
http://sustainablecities.dk/en/actions/interviews/jan-gehl-making-healthy-cities
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
35/95
35
Cultural sustainability
UNESCO (1995) defined the cultural dimension of community development33
as being
the whole complex of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features
that characterize a society or social group. It includes not only the arts and letters, but alsomodes of life, the fundamental rights of the human being, value systems, traditions and
beliefs. The basic role of art, culture, and heritage has long been to bring beauty, depth
and meaning into our daily lives, they also nurture individual and community identity,
promote social cohesion, and contribute to the creation of social capital (Kingston 2010).
More and more, culture has been recognized as an essential dimension with the potential
to transform communities and individuals in positive and meaningful ways over the long
term.
Jon Hawkes (2001) wrote The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Cultures Essential Role in
Public Planning", recognizing that a communitys vitality and quality of life is closely
related to the vitality and quality of its cultural engagement, expression, dialogue, and
celebration34
. Current main themes of cultural sustainability are summarized in box 3.4.
Hawkes model demonstrates that the contribution of culture to building lively cities and
communities plays a major role in supporting social and economic health (Duxbury and
Gillette 2007). According to him, the key to cultural sustainability is fostering
partnerships, exchange, and respect between different streams of government, business,
and arts organizations.
33
Sustainable Future - Culture and Knowledge Workshop
http://www.actpla.act.gov.au/topics/significant_projects/planning_studies/sustainable_future/workshop_
two/issues_brief34
Models of sustainability incorporating culture:
http://www.creativecity.ca/se-newsletters/special-edition-4/models-sustainability.html
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
36/95
36
Box 3.4 Key themes of cultural sustainability35
10 KEY THEMES OF CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY(Creative City Network, Canada 2007)
1. The culture of sustainabilityChanging peoples behavior and consumption patterns, and adapting to a more
sustainability-conscious lifestyle.
2. Globalization & cultural identity
Protecting local culture from globalization and market forces.
3. Heritage conservation
Recognize the history of a place and its tangible and intangible attributes.
Revitalizing and re-using heritage buildings for cultural facilities.
4. Sense of place
Building sense of place through intimate connection with our natural environment
and history. The importance of heritage and symbols, and the role of the arts in raising
community awareness and interest in sustainability are recognized.
5. Indigenous knowledge & traditional practices
Recovery and protection of cultural health, history, and the culture of indigenous
knowledge in society. Storytelling is a tool to keep memories alive and celebrate history.
6. Community cultural development
Using arts and culture as community-building tools to promote sense of place,empowerment, and public participation. Creative collaboration fosters social development
and change.
7. Arts, education & youth
The arts are seen as both development and communicative tools in communities and
schools, as they increase the effectiveness of teaching, research, policy, and actions toward
cultural sustainability and development.
8. Sustainable design
Sustainable design is seen as a component of cultural sustainability. Supporting
cultural identity can ensure the past is part of the present and will benefit the future.
9. Planning
A cultural lens is needed in city planning and design. This requires community
culture-based planning strategies that address civic identity, youth, multiculturalism, and
other aspects of communities.
10. Cultural policy & local government
The multidisciplinary nature of sustainable development requires that policies for
sustainability transcend boundaries and integrate cultural aspects.
35
Creative City Network, Canada 2007: Ten key themes of cultural sustainability
http://www.creativecity.ca/se-newsletters/special-edition-4/ten-key-themes-of-cultural-sustainability.html
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
37/95
37
Spiritual values
We need a spiritual compass to find our direction in life. A spiritual compass can help us
to navigate our path through confusion and crises, through the suffocating allure of
materialism, and through delusion and despair (Kumar 2007).
Spiritual values are essential as an inner guiding light which helps us to develop our
worldview, to seek wisdom of truth and wholeness, to find meaning of our existence and
to connect with a greater transcendent reality. Justice and compassion spring from the
hearts of people who recognize our profound interdependence and interrelatedness with
one another and the Earth (Lamborn 2010). Spiritual connection is the basis for love,
compassion and community. Our desire to deeply connect can be the most powerful force
for good (Jones et al. 2007). People with compassion have deep concern for social equality
and justice; they want to see that all people and other existences are treated with dignity
and love; they become more tolerant, more embracing, always ready to reach out to help,
to support, and glorify others (Lin 2006).
The virtues of justice, humility, service and compassion can motivate us to address our
social and environmental challenges and to build a world of peace and harmony (Jones et
al. 2007). Therefore, creating a culture of sustainability which cherishes those values of
tolerance, love, care, respect is essential in empowering and transforming community
towards a sustainable future.
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
38/95
38
3.4 Good governance
Good governance must be built from the ground up. It cannot be imposed,
either by national authorities, or by international agencies. Good governance is the fruit
of true dedication, selfless leadership, and a politics of integrity. (Annan 1997)
Good governance plays a decisive role in urban management, planning and operating
towards sustainability. While government is an entity (an official governing organization),
governance refers to the process of decision making and the process by which decisions
are implemented (UNESCAP). These governing processes involve not only the state
(government), but also the private sector and the whole civil society.
Figure 3.9 Three interrelated actors of governance
All three interconnected actors are critical for urban sustainability. Government creates a
conducive political and legal environment; the private sector generates jobs and income;
and civil society facilitates political and social interaction - mobilizing groups to
participate in economic, social and political activities (UNDP 1997). Since each part has
weaknesses and strengths, it is important for good governance to promote constructive
interaction, partnership, cooperation and coherence among all three.
Box 3.5 describes an ideal image of good governance, adapted from UNESCAP and
UNDP. Main attributes of good governance are long term vision, openness - transparency,
responsibility - accountability, equity - inclusiveness, democratic participation - citizen
involvement, effectiveness, efficiency and responsiveness to the needs of the people.
State
(Government)
Civil Society(NGOs, Community
groups)
Private Sector
(Businesses)
GOVERNANCE
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
39/95
39
Box 3.5 Characteristics of good governance (UNESCAP36 & UNDP37)
KEY ATTRIBUTES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE(UNESCAP & UNDP)
Participation All men and women should have a voice in decision-making, either directly or
through legitimate intermediate institutions that represent their interests. Such broad
participation is built on freedom of association and speech, as well as capacities toparticipate constructively.
Rule of law
Legal frameworks should be fair and enforced impartially.
Transparency
Transparency is built on the free flow of information. Processes, institutions and
information are directly accessible to those concerned with them, and enough information is
provided to understand and monitor them.Responsiveness
Good governance requires that institutions and processes try to serve all
stakeholders within a reasonable timeframe.
Consensus oriented
Good governance requires mediation of the different interests in society to reach a
broad consensus in society on what is in the best interest of the whole community and how
this can be achieved.
Equity and inclusiveness
A societys well being depends on ensuring that all its members feel that they have a
stake in it and do not feel excluded from the mainstream of society. This requires all groups,but particularly the most vulnerable, have opportunities to improve or maintain their well
being.
Effectiveness and efficiency
Good governance means that processes and institutions produce results that meet
the needs of society while making the best use of resources.
Accountability
Decision-makers in government, the private sector and civil society organisations are
accountable to the public, as well as to institutional stakeholders.
Strategic vision
Leaders and the public have a broad and long-term perspective on good governanceand sustainable development. There is also an understanding of the historical, cultural and
social complexities in which that perspective is grounded.
36
UNESCAP, Good governance:
http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp37
Governance for sustainable human development (UNDP 1997): http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/policy
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
40/95
40
These features assure that corruption is minimized, the views of minorities and the needs
of future generations are taken into account, and the voices of the most vulnerable in
society are heard in decision-making. Good governance also contributes to peace and
security because it gives societies sound structures for inclusive, equitable economic and
social development. In post-conflict settings, good governance can promote
reconciliation and offer a path for consolidating peace (Annan 1997).
Good governance demands the consent and the participation of the governed and the full
and lasting involvement of all citizens (Annan 1997). Key strategies for cultivating good
governance include developing more decentralized state, active civic organizations, and
responsible private sectors (Wheeler et al. 2005).
Decentralization is an important strategy to attain citizen involvement and government
responsiveness. Since power and decisions are closer to local people, decentralized
government is more knowledgeable and accessible. It can respond faster, more effectively
to peoples needs, with more accountability and transparency. Resource use would be
more equitable and the gap between the rich and the poor would be narrowed (Wheeler et
al. 2005).
As Kofi Annan once said (1997), good governance has to begin with the will of the
people. The will of the people must be the basis of governmental authority. That is the
foundation of democracy. Democratization is definitely vital in building good governance,
but it requires mature civic awareness, ongoing education, the development of government
structures, institutions, and time. Once established, democracies need to be tended
carefully in order to stay healthy and provide good governance for the people (Wheeler et
al. 2005).
Nowadays, the development of ICTs promises a huge potential of facilitating governance
processes. Core components of e-governance include e-participation, e-administration and
e-service delivery38. E-governance can enhance government and public institution
efficiency, transparency and accountability by providing better public service and
information delivery to citizens and others. Moreover, e-governance fosters greater
interaction between authorities and citizens, thus encouraging more public participation
38Governance assessment portal: http://www.gaportal.org/areas-of-governance/e-governance
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
41/95
41
and involvement. Various online tools can be used, such as RSS feeds, tag clouds,
interactive map, webcasts for information; blogs, online polls for consultation; e-petitions,
wikis, forum and virtual worlds for participation (WEF 2011). Social networks also
support e-governance with more equity, decentralization and democratization.
On the other hand, e-governance can make a significant positive impact on reducing
carbon dioxide emissions through the dematerialization of public service delivery. Many
paper-based services can be digitalized and situations where face-to-face interaction has
been previously required (to prove identity) can be done virtually (GeSI 2008).
8/6/2019 Urban Sustainability - Thesis
42/95
42
4. Urban Sustainability & Public Perceptions
If you want to build sustainable cities you have to take into consideration thethoughts and values of the citys inhabitants. (Paul Sinclair)39
While chapter 3 trying to search for suggestions on principles and models of urban
sustainability from expert views, chapter 4 explores how these ideas are perceived from
public perspectives, how people envision their desirable cities, and among many aspects of
urban development, what matter most to them. Moreover, opinions of HCMC residents on
current urban development of the city were also collected.
Concepts of urban sustainability researched in chapter 3 were utilized to develop the
questionnaires in chapter 4. The interrelated dimensions of urban sustainability described
in chapter 3, which are ecological balance, economic development, social cohesion,
cultural vitality and good governance, were integrated in the public surveys as features of
a desirable city.
Ecological balance is associated with a green city. Low-carbon economic development is
manifested through characteristics of a regenerative, smart and connected city with
renewable energy, waste recycling, bicycle friendly and walkable neighborhoods... Social
cohesion and cultural vitality correspond to attributes of a human-friendly and interesting
city, a city with sense of place. And in general, good governance is responsible for all of
these good practices, particularly for a just and inclusive city. In fact, these features are not
clearly categorized into any dimensions but they are interconnected, interactive and
complementary to each other.
39
Professor of African and Comparative Archaeology at Uppsala University, mentioned in Mistra article on
the Urban Mind research, T
Top Related