UNDERSTANDING OHIO’S PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
For questions, please contact: Marianne Lombardo Vice President, Ohio Alliance for Public Charter Schools (614) 744-2266 ext. 201
What is a Public Charter School?
Public Charter schools, also known as
community schools, are PUBLIC, nonprofit, nonreligious, tuition-free schools operating
independently of a school district.
2
Why do we have Public Charter Schools in Ohio?
Ohio’s Law passed in 1997, to: � Increase Innovation
� Improve Public Education � Give Parents a Public School Choice
3
Every public charter school in Ohio has a Governing Board that has a contract with a legally-approved Sponsor that is evaluated by the Ohio Department of Education.
4
What is a Sponsor?
9academic performance 9financial operations
9governance
Sponsors (also known as Authorizers) are nonprofit entities that assure compliance with rule and law and with the terms of the contract. Sponsors approve the opening of new public charter schools, provide technical assistance, and monitor:
5
Sponsors also make decisions regarding renewing and closing schools.
Who is responsible for a Public Charter School? The Three Legged Stool of Accountability
6
Gov
erni
ng B
oard
Serves Students
and Families
Sets policies, approves spending
Assures compliance
Public Charter School
Overseen and evaluated
by the Ohio Department of
Education
Annual financial audits by the
Ohio Auditor of State
Federal audits including Special
Education
Automatic Closure Law
Annual Report Card
Who are the Sponsors?
43 School Districts,
63 schools
13 Educational Service Centers,
113 schools
1 University, 1 school
1 University Designee, 52 schools
Ohio Department of Education, 13 schools
1 Career Tech Center and 1 Joint Vocational
School, 2 schools
7
62% of Ohio’s Public Charter Schools are Sponsored by a Public Entity
6 Education- related Nonprofit Organizations,
146 schools
Both public charter schools and districts must: • Follow Health & Safety, Ethics, Public Records and Privacy Laws • Admit all students* • Undergo annual financial and program audits • Adhere to core curriculum & state graduation requirements • Administer state assessments & receive a Local Report Card • Have certified, licensed and highly-qualified teachers • Report data on staff, students, and finances to the state • Employ a licensed treasurer • Comply with Open Meetings laws • Follow special education rules & regulations • Provide State Teachers/School Employees Retirement • Follow due process for suspensions and expulsions
8
* Within residency parameters and unless given permission to serve a specific population
Greater autonomy in exchange for
greater accountability
The Charter Promise: 9
Public Charters are freed from some regulations in order to try new things, but are held to performance outcomes Increased Autonomy Increased Accountability
9 Can have a specific mission, focus or curriculum
9 Can be closed for Health & Safety violations
9 Teachers can teach outside their area of certification
9 Can be closed for fiscal mismanagement
9 Have greater control over staffing decisions and pay
(are typically not unionized)
9 Can be closed for academic reasons or other contractual nonperformance
9 School leaders can make local decisions
9 Financial viability depends upon sustained enrollment
9 Exempt from laws that are not applicable
9 Are paid monthly only for students that are validated as enrolled & attending
10
Public Charters differ from Districts in that they:
• Can’t access Local Funds and are provided State Funds solely based on students they serve (districts are provided both Local and State funds for students served and for additional factors*)
• Can’t access Ohio School Facilities Commission funds • Must hold a lottery if oversubscribed • Have Boards that are appointed, rather than elected • Receive no transportation funding (except in limited cases) • Must rent or purchase facilities • Have limited access to extra-curricular activities
11
• creating a funding differential of about $3,000 per student, on average
Type of public charter schools: Management 12
For-Profit Management
Company 34%
Nonprofit Management
Company 25%
Independent "Mom-and-Pops“ (e.g.,
teachers, parents)
26%
District/ESC 14%
Juvenile Court Partnership
1%
59% of charters have a
Management Company
that oversees
daily operations
2/3 of Ohio’s Public Charter schools are run by a nonprofit or public entity or operate independently
How many Public Charter Schools are there in Ohio?
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
13
As of January 2014
There are currently 390 Public Charter Schools in Ohio.
Type of charter schools: Structure
Conversion schools are part of a traditional
public school or Educational
Service Center building. These schools may be established in
any district in the state.
There are 74 Conversion
Charter Schools.
Start-up schools are
independent of a district and may
be located only in a challenged
school district, which are the lowest
performing districts in the
state. There are 316
Start-up Charter schools.
20%
80%
14
Type of charter schools: Delivery
7%
93%
364 are Site
Based or “Brick and
Mortar” schools
26 are Online or Virtual Schools
(eschools)
15
Dayton
Cincinnati
Columbus
Toledo Cleveland
Youngstown Akron
Canton Mansfield
Springfield
Lima
16
Warren
Marion
Where are Charter Schools located? 88% of Ohio’s public charter schools are in Challenged Districts.
Big 8 Districts in bold
How many students attend Charter Schools?
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
brick and mortar students eschool students
17
121,000+, 7% of total public enrollment. 1/3 in online schools
Who can attend Public Charter Schools?
• Most public charters serve students living anywhere in the state (although lack of transportation and distance can limit access to brick & mortar schools)
• One Charter School has permission to selectively admit students*
• ALL other Charters must admit ALL students that apply, if there is space
* Menlo Park, started by parents, is allowed to serve only gifted students. Students from 44 different districts attend the school.
18
How does this differ from District schools?
• Students are assigned to a district school based on where they live
• 80% of Ohio districts allow students that reside outside their district to attend their schools • 70,000 students attend a district school outside their
resident district through Open Enrollment • 20 of the 27 top scoring districts do NOT allow open
enrollment • 40 schools in the Big 8 Districts have Selective Admissions criteria (only admit students scoring in the top 90% in assessments, for example)
19
Why do Parents choose public charter schools? � safe, orderly, caring environment � higher quality education � escape bullying* & negative peer
influences � flexibility � smaller and more personalized � desire the educational program
offered
20
*50% of online students report “bullying” as why they left their district school
Better meets their child’s needs
Type of public charter school: Program/Focus 21
General
Dropout Recovery
25%
College Ready/Early
College Online (eschool)/
blended
Arts Cultural/Language Experiential Gifted Intergenerational
1/3 of Ohio’s public charter schools serve students with exceptional educational needs
Special Education 10%
Dropout Recovery/Prevention Schools At-Risk Students • Age 16-21 • Behind grade level or have crises
that interfere with academic progress
• Individual Career Plan • Counseling and support provided Held to an Alternative Accountability rating and automatic closure system
22
90 schools 16,000 students
Examples: Life Skills, Mound Street Academies, District Conversion schools
Special Education schools At least 50% of Students have Individualized Education Plans
9 Autism and Asperger’s 9 Special Education 9 Physical Disabilities
Currently protected from
automatic closure
23
39 schools 4,000 students Examples: Summit Academies, The Autism Model School,
Oakstone Academy, Brookwood Academy
College Ready/Early College schools The Goal is for EVERY child to graduate from college � relentless pursuit to “Close
the Achievement Gap” � highly structured � Math/Science focus � extended day/year
24
44 schools 14,000 students
Examples: KIPP, Columbus Collegiate Academies, Breakthrough Schools, Columbus Preparatory Academy, Dayton Early College Academies, Charles
School at Ohio Dominican University, Horizon Science/ Noble Academies
Online Schools Individualized instruction
• flexibility for travel, training, family obligations, parenting
• students with medical needs • escape negative peers/bullying • “blended” combines group and
online instruction • high level of mobility
25
26 schools 36,000 students
Examples: Ohio Connections and Nexus Academies, Ohio Virtual Academy, Insight School of Ohio, Mosaica Online
Arts Infused Education “The art of learning” • engaged students • stimulates creativity, problem-
solving and critical thinking • builds self-confidence & self-
discipline
Examples: Toledo School of the Arts, Arts & College Preparatory Academy, and Falcon Academy of the Arts
26
7 schools 2,400 students
Cultural/Language schools 27
7 schools 1,400 students
Provides an educational program designed to meet the unique needs of a particular culture ¾ Somalian ¾ Hispanic ¾ Amish ¾ Arabic A large percentage of English Language Learners/new immigrants
Examples: Zenith Academy and Zenith Academy East, Beacon Hill Academy, Columbus Bilingual Academies, The International Academy of Columbus
Experiential or Expeditionary Learning “Live your education” • creative, curious & project-based • service learning & internships • self-discovery through challenge • real world experiences • Expeditionary Learning Network
(Outward Bound) • applied skills (Maritime Academy’s
Marine Technology Program)
28
7 schools 1,500 students
Examples: Graham Primary, Middle and High Schools, Citizens’ Leadership Academy, Wildwood Environmental Academy
The Intergenerational Schools Multigenerational communities of lifelong learners • children learn in time frames
suited to their individual capabilities
• students progress through stages • connect community members • knowledge is socially constructed
29
2 schools 400 students
Examples: The Intergenerational School, Near West Intergenerational School
Public Charter Schools have a slightly higher percentage of Special Education students
30
15% 17% 17%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8%
10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
Statewide Brick and Mortar charters
eschools
Percent Special Education
2013 Annual Report, ODE.
Public Charter Schools have a much higher percentage of Economically Disadvantaged
students
31
47%
86%
65%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Statewide Brick and Mortar charters
eschools
Percent economically disadvantaged
2013 Annual Report, ODE.
Brick & Mortar Public Charter Schools serve a much higher percentage of minority students
32
26%
75%
22%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Statewide Brick and Mortar charters
eschools
Percent minority students
2013 Annual Report, ODE.
How do Public Charter Schools Perform on Measures of Academic Achievement? Compared to Districts statewide, public charters underperform
33
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
All Charters
All Districts
A B C D F
Performance Index , 2013 results
But, comparisons need to be FAIR
Most public charter schools are located in Challenged Districts and serve a much higher percentage of historically academically challenged students: ¾Students in Dropout Recovery Schools ¾Students in Special Education Schools ¾Economically Disadvantaged students
Some district schools selectively admit top students
34
Apples to Apples = Similar Students
35
District Schools in Challenged Districts that
do not selectively admit students
Public Charter Schools located in
Challenged Districts that do not serve a
special population
Comparing Achievement in Similar Schools Public Charter Schools perform better than District Schools
36
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
A B C D F
Big 8 District Schools
Public Charter Schools in Big
8 Districts
Performance Index Big 8 District Schools, 2013 results
37
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Value Added Big 8 District Schools, 2013 results
A B C D F Public Charter Schools in Big
8 Districts
Big 8 District Schools
Comparing Academic Growth in Similar Schools Public Charter Schools perform better than District Schools
Case Study: Cleveland Schools, 2013 results
38
9%
13%
Cleveland District Schools
78% 68
schools
41%
28%
Cleveland Public Charter Schools
31% 15
schools
High to Good Performance, High to Good Growth
High Performance, Low Growth or Low Performance, High Growth
Low Performance, Low Growth
The Cleveland Transformation Plan Cleveland’s Mayor, the Cleveland Municipal
School District, and area Public Charter Schools are partnering together to increase
the number of children attending high performing schools, regardless of type, and to
share successful practices.
39
Case Study: Columbus Schools, 2013 results
14%
26%
Columbus District Schools
60% 66
schools
40
33%
36%
Columbus Public Charter Schools
31% 14 schools
High to Good Performance, High to Good Growth
High Performance, Low Growth or Low Performance, High Growth
Low Performance, Low Growth
Case Study: Toledo Schools, 2013 results 41
High to Good Performance, High to Good Growth
High Performance, Low Growth or Low Performance, High Growth
Low Performance, Low Growth
16%
25% 59%
Toledo City Schools
14%
36% 50%
Toledo Public Charter Schools
Case Study: Dayton Schools, 2013 results
42
12%
23% 65%
Dayton District schools
6%
35% 59%
Dayton Public Charter schools
High to Good Performance, High to Good Growth
High Performance, Low Growth or Low Performance, High Growth
Low Performance, Low Growth
Case Study: Cincinnati Schools, 2013 results
43
High to Good Performance, High to Good Growth
High Performance, Low Growth or Low Performance, High Growth
Low Performance, Low Growth
21%
36%
43%
Cincinnati City Schools
28%
28%
44%
Cincinnati Public Charter Schools
2013 State Awards
2013 Schools of Promise • Village Preparatory Academy • Citizen’s Academy (6th year) • Arts & College Preparatory Academy (4th year) • Columbus Preparatory Academy (2nd year) • King Academy Community School • Constellation: Lorain Community Elementary • Toledo Preparatory and Fitness
44
2013 State Awards
45
2013 High Performing Schools of Honor The Intergenerational School (2nd year) T.C.P. World Academy 2013 High Progress Schools of Honor Arts & College Preparatory Academy (2nd year) Columbus Preparatory Academy (2nd year) Constellation Schools: Elyria
Conclusions
• Public Charter Schools are held to the same financial and academic accountability standards as districts
• Public education entities are involved with the opening, oversight and operation of Public Charter Schools
• There are a wide variety of Public Charter Schools and reasons why parents choose them
46
Conclusions • When similar schools are compared, Public Charter Schools, overall, outperform urban district schools on achievement and growth
• Public Charter Schools outperform district schools in Columbus and Cleveland
• Public Charter Schools in Dayton, Toledo, Cincinnati and Youngstown perform slightly better than or as well as district schools
47