1
Understanding Cognitive BiasGretal Leibnitz, Ph.D., Washington State University
Entomological Society of America– 10 July 2013
2
Cognitive Bias
“Unconscious patterns of thought which have the unintended effect of conferring advantage to some and
disadvantage to others”
(Krieger 1995; Reskin 2000)
3
Pre-Training Homework
Comments about Ohio State Search Committee Implicit Bias Training: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZHxFU7TYo4&feature=plcp
Reviewing Applicants 3rd Edition (2012). Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison. http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/docs/BiasBrochure_3rdEd.pdf
Johnson, A. G. (2006). “Privilege, oppression and difference,” Privilege, Power, and Difference (2nd Edition.) McGraw-Hill. New York. (p 12-40).
4
Ohio State University Training Overview
Biases hide in plain sight.How can we chip away at
pervasive schemas? Be mindful in your decisions.
5
Part 1: Setting the Stage
Academic History and Bias Research Overview
6
Bias in the Academy(1970) Dr. Fox Experiment
Actor Michael Fox (not Michael J. Fox!)
Lectured at USC Med School faculty conference Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to
Physician Education Meaningless double-talk, non-sequiturs,
contradictions, jargonThree separate professional audiences
gave overwhelmingly positive evaluations despite meaningless content!
Naftulin, D., Ware, J., and Donnelly, F. (1973). The Doctor Fox Lecture: A Paradigm of Educational Seduction. Journal of Medical Education, vol. 48, p. 630-635.
Doctor Fox Lecture video: http://ecclesiastes911.net/dr_fox/video.html
7
o At every level of productivity, as measured by impact scores, women were rated as less competent.
Evaluation Bias in the Academy: (1997) Nature Study
Swedish Medical Research Council peer reviewers exhibit unintentional sex bias in scientific merit decisions. (Wenneras & Wold (1997) http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v387/n6631/pdf/387341a0.pdf )
8
Letters of Recommendation Bias(2003) Trix & Psenka
Letters written for men emphasized competence traits (e.g., achievements, research, and successes)
Letters written for women emphasized interpersonal traits (e.g., compassion, teaching, relationships)
9
10
More Bias in the Academy: (2012) PNAS
Despite identical application materials, faculty (regardless of sex) rated the male applicant as more competent and hirable, and conferred upon him a significantly higher salary. Moss-Racusin et al. (2012) http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/14/1211286109.full.pdf+html?with-ds=yes
11
Disrupting the Bias (2012) Nature
In 2010–11, Nature published too few women authors in News and Views (i.e., “in life, physical and Earth sciences women authors were 17%, 8% and 4%, respectively…”)
D. Conley & J. Stadmark, (2012). Nature, 488, 590.
“There is a need for every editor to ask themselves, ‘Who are the five women I could ask?’”
12
In Social Systems• Identity is socially
constructed• We learn social and
cultural values • May be influenced
by past/hidden prejudices
Humans develop cognitive schemas
• Mental “file-folders” of information about categories of persons, places, things,
• These serve as mental models/prototypes/expectancies
How does Cognitive Bias Occur?
Shortcuts can lead to unintended
discrimination and erroneous
decisions
As we encounter individuals…
For efficiency, all humans use pre-conscious cognitive shortcuts • social = stereotypes • information = cognitive
heuristicsto interpret/predict behavior and inform reactions
13
Stage 2: Implicit Social Bias
Implicit Construction of Social Bias
Implicit Association Measurement
14
Formation of Unconscious Sex Biases
Social Systems: Unequal gender distribution in certain roles creates implicit associations [Eagly (1987); Glick & Fiske (1996)]
Cognitive Schemas or Mental “File-folders”: o Domain specific (i.e., Work = male, Family = female);
(Science = male, Arts = female); (Leader = male; Follower = female)
o Generalize to traits (i.e., male = independent, competent, assertive; female = cooperative, warm, submissive)
Ultimately, manifest in reflexive bias…o Can be at odds with conscious goals; can influence
attention, perception, judgment and behavior
15
Measuring Unconscious Bias
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998)
Measures strength of association between concepts Based on premise that associated concepts will be
easier to categorize together Scientific American Frontiers (7:57): http://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RSVz6VEybk
Entomology-specific Implicit Association Test Activity
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation
16
Project Implicit Discussion
What did the test suggest about us?
How can taking these tests help us?
What are potential disadvantages of this awareness?
17
• Stereotypes are automatic and are useful, to the extent that they are functional.
• Undoing established and pervasive cultural biases requires significant effort.
Reflection Point 1
• Both men and women hold implicit biases against women in STEM disciplines and leadership.
• We are all influenced by stereotypes.
18
Recognizing Schemas Activities
Get-to-know-your-schemas (mental models) Activity Select an identity group other than your own (such as
nationality, race, age, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, ability/disability, etc.)
Write down stereotypes associated with that group Cross through those that you do not believe Recognize that if you can write them down, your pre-
conscious mind may be accessing them.
“In-Groups/Out-Groups” Thought HomeworkHow can you create interaction across groups?
19
In-group and Out-group
20
Stage 3: Information Processing “Mind Bugs”
Perception Errors and Cognitive Limitations
Common Biases and Attribution Errors
21
22
23
24
What Biases and Attributions are Operating?
25
Example Biases and Attribution Errors Handout
26
Cognitive Processing Biases Activity
Select three biases and attribution errors that you recognize in yourself
Consider strategies to recognize and address these biases/attribution errors in different settings: When you are alone In a group
27
Reflection Point 2
The way we perceive, judge and remember is often full of errors (feeling confident ≠ being accurate).
What we already know affects what we see; preconceived expectations influence judgments.
“Mind bugs” are ordinary: by-products of normal mental processes (e.g., memory,
perception, learned associations) unintentional (i.e., occur without awareness or control) all of us are prone to these errors
28
Automatic (Intuition) Mindful (Reasoning)
RapidAutomatic EffortlessParallelAssociativeSlow-learningEmotionalShared w/other
animals
DeliberateIntentionalEffortfulSerialRule-governedFlexibleEmotionally neutralUnique to humans
Stage4: Types of Human Cognition
EFFICIENT Time-ConsumingACCURATE
29
When does Automatic Thinking Occur?
Answering simple, rote questions (2 + 2)Orienting to a sudden soundReading words on large billboardsDriving a car on an empty roadDetecting hostility in a voiceResponding in emergenciesDetecting one object is more distant than anotherMaking judgments based on learning and
experience
30
Automatic Assumptions can Lead to Poor Decisions
31
When does Mindful Thinking Occur?
Focusing on a particular voice in a noisy roomLooking for a woman with white hairCounting occurrences of the letter “k” on a page of
textFilling out a tax formChecking the validity of a complex logical
argumentMonitoring the appropriateness of our behavior in
a social settingMultiplying 3-digit numbers togetherMaintaining a faster walking speed than normal
32
Conflict between Automatic and Mindful Processing
1. Go down each column and say whether each word is printed in lowercase or upper case
2. Go down each column again and say whether each word is printed to the left or the right
LEFT
left
right
RIGHT
RIGHT
left
LEFT
right
upper
lower
LOWER
upper
UPPER
lower
LOWER
upper
33
34
35
Reducing Bias by Promoting Mindfulness
Create conditions for Mindful thinking Take your time Limit distractions Focus your attention Manage your energy Manage your blood sugar
36
Reducing Bias by Promoting Mindfulness
Develop processes that require Mindful thinking Include “reflection” breakpoints Encourage accuracy rather than efficiency Engage in deep evaluative conversations Look for value in different opinions Seek contrary information Consider all relevant data Establish external accountability
37
Stage 5: Mindfulness Process
38
Applied Individual Activities
“Mind-Bugs” Awareness Index (Self-Study) Practice:
Identifying how stereotypes bias evaluation of merit Recognizing bias in letters of recommendation (Letter 1; Letter 2) Become familiar with your own biases in terms of the
“Mind-Bugs” decision-making model (“Mind-Bugs” Handout)
39
“Mind-Bugs” Awareness Self-Evaluation
40
Evaluation of Merit
41
42
43
(Letter 1: http://www.wordle.net/)
44
(Letter 2: http://www.wordle.net/)
45
“Mind-Bugs” in Decision-Making Handout
46
Mindfulness Process (Continued)
47
Interaction with Others
Practice: Communicating with colleagues about bias witnessed
48
Communication Practice Handout
49
Mindfulness Process (Continued)
50
More Decision Process Activities
“Mind-Bugs” Biases Handout Discussion Identify top 3 biases (individually and for the group)
Build group ground-rules supporting mindfulness Discuss how to mindfully communicate to be understood
and to understand Discuss cues to identify when group is engaging in
“mindlessness” Discuss cues to identify when group is engaging in
“mindfulness” Identify “reflection” breakpointsBuild in a correction process(es)
51
“Mind-Bugs” in Decision-Making Handout
52
Mindfulness Process: Putting it all Together
53
Next Steps
Elect a “Treasurer” ExerciseThink-Pair-Share Activity
Where are you going to apply this information?Reflection “Homework”
54
Recruitment/Promotion Process Suggestions
Use gender-neutral job titles (e.g., chair not chairman) (McConnel & Fazio, 1996)
Identify and rank specific evaluation criteria prior to reviewing (Uhlmann & Cohen, 2005)
Reduce time pressure and distractions (Bertrand et al., 2005)
Mask applicant’s sex, race… (Goldin & Rouse, 2000)
Evaluate individuals across criteria to avoid “raising the bar” for non-traditional candidates (Nosek, 2012)Use the same criteria in all recommendation letters (e.g., emphasize applicants competence in research, teaching, service.) (Trix & Psenka, 2003)
55
Reflection “Homework”
56
Stage 6: Summary and Conclusion
Cognitive Bias : Cognitive Bias Development Model Implicit Social Biases Implicit Processing Biases
Types of Human Cognition Automatic Mindful
Overcoming bias Addressing schemas Promoting Mindful Thinking
58
Recommended Resources
Banaji, M. & Greenwald, A. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. Delacorte Press, NY.
Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S. (2003). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9873.
Bloom, L. (2012). The Cure for Corporate Stupidity: Avoid the Mind-BugsTM that Cause Smart People to Make Bad Decisions. Xmente, Atlanta.
Gutierrez y Muhs, G., Niemann, Y., Gonzalez, C., Harris, A. (2012). Presumed Incompetent: The Intersections of Race and Class for Women in Academia. University Press of Colorado, CO.
Johnson, A. G. (2006). Privilege, oppression and difference. Privilege, Power, and Difference (2nd Edition.) McGraw-Hill. New York. (p 12-40).
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, NY. Krieger, L. (1995). The Content of our Categories. Stanford Law Review. McIntosh, P. (1989). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack website: http
://www.uakron.edu/dotAsset/1662103.pdf Naftulin, D., Ware, J., and Donnelly, F. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational
seduction. Journal of Medical Education, vol. 48, p. 630-635. Reskin, B. (2000). The Proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary
Sociology, vol. 29, No. 2, p. 319-328. http://facultyhiring.uoregon.edu/files/2011/05/The-proximate-causes-of-employment-discrimination-28y5tsa.pdf
Ridgway, C. (2011). Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Top Related