8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
1/31www.americanprogress.o
Unburdening Americas Middle ClasShrinking Families Debt Burden Faster Is Imperative for Strong
Sustained Economic Growth
Christian E. Weller November 2011
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
2/31
Unburdening AmericasMiddle ClassShrinking Families Debt Burden Faster Is Imperative
for Strong, Sustained Economic Growth
Christian E. Weller November 2011
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
3/31
1 Introduction and summary
6 Defining household leverage
11 Excessive debt laid the foundation for prolonged slump
16 Three pathways to deleveraging
25 Conclusion
Contents
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
4/31
1 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Introduction and summary
Excessive leverageoo much household debremains he scourge o our econ-
omy. I holds back consumer spending and resuls ar oo oen in massive economic
disress or millions o American amilies acing record-high oreclosures. oo much
household deb also leaves banks relucan o exend new loans or home purchases
and business expansions because hese lenders already have billions o dollars in bad
loans on heir books and don wan o hrow good money aer bad.
Tis all slows business invesmen. Businesses wan o mee he exising demand oconsumers and oher businesses primarily wih heir exising capaciy. Businesses
have no incenive o quickly build up new capaciy unless households can dig ou
rom under he mounain o deb more quickly han has been he case so ar.
Helping American workers and heir amilies deleverage can occur hrough hree
channels. One is o leave he decline o deb o marke orces hrough massive home
morgage oreclosures and igh lending sandards ha preven he expansion o
much new credi. Anoher, less-painul possibiliy or households is he renanc-
ing o exising deb ino lower-ineres-rae deb, hus making i easier o repay heir
oal ousanding deb. And he nal way o deleverage household deb is an increase
in aer-ax incomes. Incomes can grow due o more jobs, higher wages, lower axes,
and beter unemploymen insurance benes, among ohers.
A closer look a he daa on household indebedness in he Unied Saes illusraes
he imporance o deleveraging swily or a srong economic recovery as well as he
value o a mulipronged approach in reducing deleveraging hrough aser declines
in ousanding deb, more renancing ino lower-cos deb, and quicker increases in
personal incomes. Consider ha:
Economic growh says oo low. Gross domesic produc, or GDP, grew a an
annual rae o 2.5 percen in he hird quarer o 2011. Te economy has expanded
now by 5.6 percen in inaion-adjused erms, he slowes growh during he rs
nine quarers o an economic recovery since World War II. Business invesmen
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
5/31
2 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
expanded a a srong 16.3 percen in he hird quarer o 2011 , while expor
growh remained subpar wih 4.0 percen, consumpion regained some srengh,
expanding a 2.4 percen, bu only because personal saving ell precipiously.
And, governmen spending was a. Economic growh is sill oo low o creae
sucien jobs o subsanially reduce he unemploymen rae. Low personal
income growh is holding back consumer demand and scal roubles o govern-mens in he Unied Saes and abroad impede U.S. economic growh.
Te deb is highes among he middle class. Middle-income amilies beore he
crisis had a deb-o-income raio o 155.4 percen in 2007, he las year or which
daa are available, or amilies wih incomes beween $62,000 and $100,000,
which consiued he ourh quinile o income in our naion in 2007. Tis raio
is higher han or any oher income group. Families in he op 20 percen o
income (wih incomes above $100,000) had a raio o deb o income o 123.6
percen, and amilies in he hird quinile (wih incomes beween $39,100 and
$62,000) owed 130.7 percen o heir income. Households in he botom 40percen o he income disribuion (wih incomes below $39,100 in 2007) owed
well below 100 percen o heir income.
Tis high deb holds back consumpion in he curren recovery. Households
used heir homes as AMs beore he crisis, nancing record shares o consumer
spending wih deb. Bu his rend reversed wih he onse o he housing and
nancial crises, when households could no longer use heir homes as AMs.
Whas more, inaion-adjused consumpion expanded by only 4.3 percen
rom he sar o he recovery in June 2009 o June 2011, marking is slowes
growh o any recovery o his lengh since World War II.
All o hese highly indebed households ofer litle incenive or businesses o
inves more quickly. Highly indebed households also have high deb paymens
and hus less money o spend on oher consumpion iems. And businesses may
conclude ha here is a likely slowdown or uure consumpion because con-
sumers will remain heavily indebed ino he oreseeable uure. Businesses will
conclude ha here will be slow consumpion growh in he uure and hus inves
less. Te high deb levels o he pas may hus help explain in par ha business
invesmen is well below is long-erm hisoric rend.
So wha can policymakers do o correc his problem? Well, in some cases
Americans wih heavy deb loads simply have oo much deb or policy o iner-
vene efecively. Policy reorms canno help everybody, bu or mos Americans
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
6/31
3 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
in he middle class, he wherewihal o pay of heir deb is wihin reach i given a
ghing chance. Helping ha process along more swily should be a op prioriy or
policymakers. Heres why:
I could ake many more years or deb o reach susainable levels i he decline in
household deb is le o marke orces alone. Deb levels could reach he levelso he 1990s, which wen along wih a as growing economy and srong nancial
markes, only by he end o 2017 i aer-ax income coninues o grow a he rae o
las year and deb says a. (see able 1 on nex page) Tis do-nohing scenario
means prolonged oreclosures and ighening lending sandards. I could alerna-
ively ake unil Sepember 2036 o reach he deb-o-aer-ax-income raio o he
1990s i income growh says moderae and deb sars growing a he modes rae
o 3 percen per year.
Renancing ino lower-cos deb, especially morgages, could accelerae deleverag-
ing and boos consumpion. Households, which oday are able o ake advanage ohisorically low morgage raes i hey are eligible or renancing, could reduce heir
morgage paymens by subsanial amouns and hus reach susainable deb levels
more quickly i hey received argeed help in renancing. Tey could hen use he
savings o pay back heir deb more quickly. Renancing alone would bring house-
holds o he deb levels o he 1990s abou 18 monhs earlier han doing nohing
would, assuming ha renancing lowers he deb service burden o consumers by 1
percen o heir aer-ax income and i he savings are used o repay he ousanding
deb. (see able 1 on nex page)
Booss o aer-ax incomes would allow household deb o all o susainable levels
years earlier han i oherwise would. Raising aer-ax income growh rom he 4
percen levels o he pas year o 7 percen could help households reach he deb
levels o he 1990s abou wo-and-a-hal years earlier han doing nohing. (see able
1) Te benes rom aser income growh are larger han rom renancing since
ineres raes canno all much urher rom where hey are now. Te combinaion
o renancing and aser income growh would allow households o reach he deb
levels o he 1990s more han hree years sooner han hey would by doing nohing.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
7/31
4 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
TABLE 1
Unburdening our middle class
Pathways to sustainable debt-to-after-tax-income ratios
Share of saving
explained by
change in
category,
previous
labor market
contractionsCategory
Share of saving
explained
by change
in category,
Great Recession
Relative
difference
Share of saving
explained by
change in
category,
two years after
labor market
contraction ended
Expected
change after
Great
Recession
Motor vehicles
and parts
Furnishings and
durable household
equipment
-102.8
-44.3
-27.3
-12.4
-73.4%
-72.0%
-60.00%
-4.70%
-15.9%
-1.3%
Recreational goods
and vehicles
Other durable
goods
-16.6
-8.1
-8.6
-2.2
-48.2%
-72.8%
-13.50%
-2.10%
-7.0%
-0.6%
Food and beverages
purchased for off-
premeses consumption
Clothing and
footwear
-62.7
-50.9
0.6
-9.4
-101.0%
-81.5%
68.80%
17.40%
-0.7%
3.2%
Gasoline and other
energy goods
Other nondurable
goods
-8.8
-10.9
-12.1
1.5
37.5%
-113.8%
-3.20%
-2.20%
-4.4%
0.3%
Services
Personal interest
payments
196
-3.7
-16.0
-18.2
-108.2%
391.9%
-90.20%
-8.30%
7.4%
-40.8%
Personal current
transfer payments
Housing and
utilities
13.9
46.60%
4.1
2.50%
-70.5%
-94.6%
-1.60%
-15.40%
-0.5%
-0.8%
Health care
Transportation
125.00%
-16.50%
22.20%
-9.70%
-82.2%
-41.2%
-32.00%
-10.70%
-5.7%
-6.3%
Recreation
services
Food services and
accommodation
9.50%
-15.70%
-5.40%
-6.30%
-156.8%
-59.9%
-9.30%
-7.10%
5.3%
-2.8%
Financial 28.60% -13.90% -148.6% -15.00% 7.3%
Notes: The scenarios assume a starting debt-to-after-tax-income level of 114.3 percent in June 2011. The average debt-to-after-tax-income ratio forthe period from December 1994 to March 2001 was 89.1 percent, which is one possible threshold for sustainable debt levels, as discussed in the text.
The scenarios further assume an after-tax income growth of 4 percent and debt growth of 0 percent for the baseline do-nothing proposal. Fastincome growth is assumed to equal 7 percent.
Renancing assumes a reduction of the debt service burdenmeasured as debt service to after-tax incomeby 1 percent of after-tax income, and itassumes that the savings will be used to repay the outstanding principal. See text for further discussion of the eect of renancing andafter-tax-income growth on deleveraging.
Source: Authors calculations based on Release Z.1 Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States. Washington, DC: BOG.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
8/31
5 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Te coninued high deb levels ha households carry on heir shoulders pose a major
drag on household spending and on he economy. Policymakers hus ace a choice o
leave he adjusmen o high deb levels relaive o aer-ax incomes o marke orces
alone, wih all o he economic pain ha i enails. Or policymakers could do some-
hing abou i by:
Helping more borrowers renance a hisorically low ineres Boosing aer-ax incomes hrough aser job creaion by invesing in inrasrucure Enacing emporary payroll ax breaks Exending unemploymen insurance benes
In he pages ha ollow, hen, his paper will examine in more deail he conse-
quences o high indebedness o American amilies and he broader economy
beore exploring he benes o encouraging he more swi resoluion o high
indebedness in our sociey. We hen discuss some basic policy guidelines ha
policymakers should consider o make his happen in he coming years.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
9/31
6 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Defining household leverage
Household leverage is he amoun o money ha a household owes relaive o is
abiliy o repay ha money. Ta simple concep ranslaes ino several diferen
measures, all o which allow or slighly diferen insighs.
Firs, here is he raio o deb o oal aer-ax income. Tis raio shows he
indebedness o a household relaive o is abiliy o pay back a loan now and in
he uure. Tis raio, hough, ignores he ac ha ineres raes can change over
ime, which may make i harder o repay he exising amoun o deb i ineresraes rise or easier i ineres raes all.
Tere is hus a second, relaed measure ha capures he repaymen burdenprin-
cipal and inereso all ousanding deb o aer-ax income. Tis measure shows
how much he average household currenly pays or is ousanding deb. Tis
measure, hough, provides litle direc sense o how much deb a household owns.
Specically, his measure does no give a sense o economic vulnerabiliies i ineres
raes rise again since higher deb levels can ranslae more quickly ino higher deb
repaymens i ineres raes go up han would be he case or lower deb levels.
A hird household leverage measure is he raio o oal deb o asses. I shows
how much money a bank could recover i asses ha a household owned were sold
o repay he loans. Tis measure, however, assumes ha asses can acually be sold
when he household needs o repay he loan. Te recen experience in he hous-
ing marke shows ha his is no always he case. Banks may no be able o recover
heir ousanding loans even i he household has an asse as collaeral or a loan.
Te discussion below uses all hree measures o household leverage bu he pre-
erred indicaors are he rs wo, which capure he burden ha deb places onhouseholds relaive o heir abiliy o pay back ha deb. Mos o he discussion
will in ac concenrae on he raio o deb o aer-ax income, and will use he
oher measures o illusrae key poins only where appropriae.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
10/31
7 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Figure 1
Tracking high indebtedness
Household debt to after-tax income, 1952-2011
Leverage is still high after years of declining loans
Te recen economic and nancial crises go underway in 2007, alhough he Grea
Recession did no ocially sar unil he end o 2007. Te crisis sared when ami-
lies who had borrowed ever-larger morgages during he housing boom years o make
up or weak income growh and rapidly rising prices could no longer repay heir deb.Banks subsequenly oreclosed on he homes o millions o amilies while bad loans
coninued o pile up in a rapidly weakening economy. Te nancial crisis and eco-
nomic recession ed on each oher, leading o urher oreclosures, less new deb rom
banks, and he wors recession since he Grea Depression.
Te implicaions or he curren epid economic recovery are huge. High household
indebedness is one acor ha holds back consumpion growh in he recovery and
hus impedes aser economic growh and more hiring. Consumpion and economic
growh are inricaely linked since consumpion makes up more han 70 percen o
gross domesic produche broades measure o economic growhand since 87.6percen o economic growh during he economic recovery ha sared in June 2009
came rom consumpion.1 Bu consumpion growh amouned o only a oal o 4.3
percen or he rs eigh quarers o his recovery, which is he slowes growh rae
or any recovery o his lengh since World War II.2
Slow consumpion growh hence conribues o slow
economic growh in his recovery. High and alling
indebedness likely explains par o his slow growh
patern jus like rising indebedness during he boom
years beore he crisis conribued o aser con-
sumpion growh han oherwise would have been
he case, as discussed below.
Te daa on oal household indebedness illusrae
he boom-and-bus cycle o he pas years. (see
Figure 1) Household leverage is ypically dened
as he amoun o deb relaive o aer-ax income,
meaning he raio o wha is owed o households
abiliy o repay wha is owed. Households owed arecord-high 130.2 percen o heir aer-ax income
in Sepember 2007.3
Notes: Total debt reers to credit market liabilities. Sources: Calculations are based on: Federal RRelease Z.1 - Flow o Funds Accounts o the United States, available at http://www.ederalrese
Mar
52
Mar
57
Mar
62
Mar
67
Mar
72
Mar
77
Mar
82
Mar
87
Mar
92
Mar
97
Mar
02
Percent of after-tax income
Quarter
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
11/31
8 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Te daa also show an unprecedened acceleraion in household deb jus beore he
nancial and economic crises. Household deb sared o gradually increase beginning
in he mid-1980s as inaion and ineres raes sared o all rom very high levels ha
made i easier or borrowers o aford more deb. Bu household indebedness rs
began o accelerae wih he recession ha sared in March 2001. Households needed
more deb o mainain heir consumpion as rs he recession in 2001 desroyed jobsand hen a very weak labor marke expansion hrough 2007 wen along wih he slowes
job growh o any business cycle since he Grea Depression. 4
Te raio o deb o aer-ax income increased each quarer a a rae o 1.4 percenage
poins rom March 2001 o December 2007. Household indebedness rose by less han
one-h his rae0.28 percenage poins on average each quarerduring he busi-
ness cycle o he 1990s, rom Sepember 1990 o March 2001.
Te nancial and economic crises o 2007 o 2009 reversed a decades-long rend o
ever-more household indebedness. Te raio o deb o aer-ax income sood a114.3 percen in June 2011, well below is peak level o 130.2 percen in Sepember
2007. Tis reecs an unprecedened drop in he raio o deb o aer-ax income,
largely because banks held igh on giving ou a lo o new loans so ha households
paid of old deb bu couldn ge new deb.
In addiion, many ousanding loans, especially morgages bu also credi cards and
oher orms o household deb, wen bad during he crisis.5 Banks wroe hem of
heir books, hus lowering he amoun o ousanding deb urher. oal inaion-
adjused household deb hence ell by $1.4 rillion (in 2011 dollars) or 9.4 percen
rom Sepember 2007 o June 2011.6
Leverage highest among middle-income households before the crisis
Te deb boom preceding hese crises was inimaely ied o a housing boom. Ta is,
households who owned heir own home or who bough a new home could go deeper
ino deb han reners. Tis implies ha he deb boom was concenraed among
middle-income amilies. Lower-income amilies were less likely han middle-income
amilies o own heir own home and hus had less access o home equiy againswhich hey could borrow. And higher-income amilies oen had more nancial
resources (savings and income) han middle-income amilies, which kep hem rom
going deeper ino deb o mainain heir spending.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
12/31
9 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Diferen akes on he same daa show ha leverage was highes among middle-
income amilies, jus beore he crises. Tis auhor ndsbased on household
daa rom he Federal Reserves Survey o Consumer Financesha he raio o
deb o income or amilies in he ourh quinile o income (beween $55,331 and
$88,030) was 137 percen in 2004, higher han or any oher income group. (see
Figure 2) Families in he op quinile earning more han $88,030 had a raio odeb o income o 116 percen, and amilies in he hird quinile (beween $34,738
and $55,331) owed 108 percen o heir income. Households in he botom 40
percen o he income disribuion (earning less han $34,738) owed well below 100
percen o heir income.
Similarly, Brian Bucks and his colleagues a he Federal Reserve concluded ha
he share o deb o asses was highes among households in he ourh quinile in
2007, wih a raio o 25.3 percen o deb o asses, compared o 24.3 percen or
households in he hird quinile, and 23.4 or households beween he 80h and 90h
percenile. Households in he op 10 percen and in he botom 40 percen o heincome disribuion owed subsanially less han 20 percen o heir asses in 2007.7
Figure 2 shows ha deb was also highes among middle-income amilies beore
he crisis in 2007, he las year or which daa exis. Te median deb-o-income
raio or households in he hird and ourh quinile, earning beween $39,100 and
$100,000 in 2007, was higher wih 130.7 percen and 155.4 percen han or any
oher income group.8 Te daa also show ha very high-income amilieshose
in he op 5 percen o he income disribuion, earning more han $177,000 in
2007had less han 100 percen o heir income in deb.
Te increases in deb, relaive o income or relaive o asses, were larges among
middle-income households aer 2001, when ha eigh-monh-long recession
ended. Te raio o deb o income rose by more han 30 percen, or insance, or
households in he hird and ourh quinile o he income disribuion rom 2001
o 2004. Tis raio grew by less han 30 percen or all oher households, lower
income and higher income.9
In addiion, he raio o deb o assesan alernaive measure o leverage
increased ases or households in he ourh quinile, wih a jump o more han40 percen, rom 2001 o 2007. Households wih income in he second and hird
quinile and above he 80h percenile bu below he 90h percenile experienced
increases o more han 25 percen in heir raio o deb o asses rom 2001 o
2007. Lower-income and higher-income households experienced much smaller
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
13/31
10 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
increases in leverage han middle-income house-
holds didindependen o how leverage is mea-
suredduring he boom years o he 2000s, when
household deb expanded ases.
Figure 2 also illusraes ha deb growh wasases among middle-income amilies rom 2001
o 2007. Te deb growh was mos pronounced
among amilies in he hird and ourh quinile
o he income disribuion, or households wih
incomes beween $39,100 and $100,000 in 2007.10
Households in he botom 40 percen o he
income disribuion, earning less han $39,100 in
2007, saw relaively sable deb-o-income raios
during he deb boom years, as did households in
he op 5 percen o he income disribuion, earn-ing more han $177,000 in 2007.
Notes: All fgures are in percent. All fgures are median debt-to-income ratios. Data apply only twho owe any debt. Sources: Income classifcations are rom: Historical Income Tables, availablcensus.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.html. Authors calculations bo Consumer Finances, available at http://www.ederalreserve.gov/econresdata/sc/scfndex.h
Figure 2
The middle class is most highly indebted
Debt to income, by income groups, 2001 to 2007
Income group
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
Firstquintile
Secondquintile
Thirdquintile
Fourthquintile
Fifthquintile
T
2001 2004 2007
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htm8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
14/31
11 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Excessive debt laid the foundation
for prolonged slump
Te economy o he las business cycle, rom March 2001 o December 2007,
depended heavily on banks pushing ever-more deb on consumers. In each
quarer during ha period, households purchasing powermeasured as aer-ax
incomeincreased by an annual rae o 3.1 percen because o more deb on op
o acual income growh. Bu ha also mean ha he deb burden increased a an
unprecedened rae during he las business cycle, laying he oundaion or a lo
o economic pain o ollow.
Households buying power rose especially because households ook ou more mor-
gages, eiher bigger morgages or second morgages or home equiy loans. Households
needed he addiional money o pay or ever-more expensive homes bu hey also
nanced oher consumpion iems, such as new cars and college uiion, wih he
addiional deb.11 Figure 3 shows he diference beween new morgages minus money
spen on homes, relaive o aer-ax income.12 A posiive number shows when house-
holds used cashed-ou equiy rom heir homes o
nance consumpion ouside o heir homes.
Te daa are consisenly posiive and show
subsanial increases in households buying power
beore he crises, as amilies wen deeper ino
deb. Te quickly building-up household deb
levels, hopping o ever-new record highs, was he
uel ha anned he ame o he unsusainable
economic expansion beore he Grea Recession.
More household deb also ueled consumer spend-
ing beore he crises. Te increasing use o homeequiy wihdrawals rom more and more mor-
gages also shows up in rapidly rising deb-nanced
consumer spending on new homes and on oher
iems. Consumers can use new deb o pay or new
houses, oher consumpion, and o inves in socks
and oher nancial asses.
Notes: All fgures are fve-year average ratios to reduce volatility in the data.
Sources: Calculations are based on: Federal Reserve Statistical Release Z.1 - Flow o Funds AccoUnited States.
Figure 3
Borrowing to overcome flat incomes
Difference between new mortgages and the ratio of real
expenditures (after accounting for inflation) to after-tax
Percent of after-tax income
Quarter
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Dec
56
Dec
61
Dec
66
Dec
71
Dec
76
Dec
81
Dec
86
Dec
91
Dec
96
Dec
01
Dec
06
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
15/31
12 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
I is crucial o undersand ha he rise in consumer indebedness was he resul o
a or declining incomes coupled wih sharply higher prices or large necessiies,
such as healh care, cars o go o and rom work, gasoline, housing and uiliies,
and ood. Te evidence also indicaes ha amilies were becoming less oleran
o conspicuous consumpionheir willingness o borrow money o pay or a
vacaion, o buy jewelry, and o pay or a ur coa, among oher such iems, did noincrease aer 2001.13 Families rising indebedness was hus one way o loosening
a growing middle-class squeeze, even i only emporarily.
Figure 4 calculaes he raio o he sum o all new deb during a business cycle o
he sum o all consumpion plus he sum o all residenial real esae spending plus
he sum o all new invesmens in nancial asses during his period.14 Te average
deb-nanced consumer spending exceeded 10 percen during he business cycle
rom March 2001 o December 2007, a hisorical high and subsanially above he
levels o deb-nanced consumer spending during any oher business cycle.
Tis is especially impressive since consumpion ou o aer-ax income and
spending on new homes were a record highs.15 Te share o deb-nanced
consumer spending reached a record high when consumers were also spending
more o heir income han hey ypically had. Te daa clearly show ha he
economic expansion o he 2000s heavily relied on consumers dependence on
more and more deb.
Te nancial and economic crises in 2007 and he
years hereaer saw deb alling, placing a drag
on consumer spending. Households, or insance,
sared o again pu more money ino heir homes
each quarer han hey ook ou new morgages.
(see Figure 3 on page 11). Raher han wihdraw-
ing equiy rom heir homes, households pu more
money ino heir homes han hey borrowed in
new morgages.16 And he deb-nanced share o
consumer spending urned negaive or he rs
ime since he 1950s, suggesing ha deb no
longer ueled consumer spending bu raher pu adrag on i (see Figure 4), assuming ha some o he
decline in deb was caused by deb repaymens and
no all by loan deauls.
Figure 4
Borrowing to spendSharing income of consumer spending on consumption a
real estate financed put of new debt, business cycle aver
Business cycle start
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
Sept - 53 Sept - 57 Mar - 61 Dec - 69 Mar - 01Sept - 73 Mar - 80 Sept - 90
4.9% 4.9%5.2%
4.5%
7.3% 6.5%6.1%
10.3%
Percent of consumer spending
Notes: Figures are in percent. The fgures represent the average ratio o the sum o new househsum o consumption plus the sum o residential real estate spending plus the sum o all net asduring a business cycle. Sources: Authors calculations are based on: Bureau o Economic AnalyIncome and Product Accounts (Department o Commerce, 2011).
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
16/31
13 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Te lack o easy access o morgages and oher orms o consumer credi hus
was one acor ha conribued o slow consumpion growh during he eco-
nomic recovery ha sared in June 2009. Lenders became increasingly careul in
exending credi because bad loans were piling up on heir books as hey increased
oreclosures o unprecedened raes. And home values ell more rapidly han
homeowners could build up new equiy, which mean ha many homeownersremained underwaer on heir morgages, owing more han heir homes were
worh. Tis, o course, made lenders even more relucan o exend new credi.
Te resul: igh-sed banks and a massive recession drove unemploymen
higher, which urher slowed income growh and kep household indebedness
and he associaed nancial problems high. Te real economic efec was slow
consumpion growh hroughou he economic recovery ha sared in June
2009. High unemploymen and allen sock and house values are he oher acors.
Inaion-adjused consumpion expanded by 4.3 percen in he rs wo years
aer he recovery sared, rom June 2009 o June 2011. Tis was he slowes con-sumpion growh o any recovery o his lengh since World War II.17
High household indebedness also conribued o slow business invesmen.
Business invesmen has been below 10 percen o GDP hroughou he economic
recovery, well below is long-erm hisorical average o 11.2 percen o GDP.
Businesses may no see a srong reason o expand heir capaciy by invesing more
i households already pay a lo or heir exising deb.
Tere are wo reasons or his. One may be ha high indebedness oday may mean
ha households are spending less on consumpion and so businesses may expec
ha consumpion will no increase much in he uure because curren consump-
ion growh is low.18 Alernaively, high indebedness in he presen may help nance
consumpion in he presen, as was he case during he years beore he crisis in
2007. Bu his kind o renewed deb accumulaion is ulimaely unsusainable.
Businesses know ha households are more and more overburdened wih deb
and hus will evenually have o slow consumpion. Businesses know ha a pary
nanced by deb will be ollowed by an evenual deb hangover. Eiher way, com-
panies may expec ha consumers will consume less in he uure and hus slowinvesmen in subsequen years. Te upsho: High deb burdens oday should be
ollowed by low invesmen by businesses a leas in he near erm.
Te daa show ha low business invesmen ollows high household indebedness.
Te Federal Reserve calculaes a raio called he deb service raio, which is he
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
17/31
14 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
share o aer-ax income ha he average house-
hold pays or principal repaymen and ineres
paymens on heir ousanding deb. High deb
service burdens have led he way or lower busi-
ness invesmen in he pas ew decades as Figure
5 shows. Indeed, here is an eerie regulariy inhe daa since 1989 ha suggess ha high deb
burdens are ollowed by less business invesmen
in he near uure.19
Figure 5 shows he average deb burden o aer-
ax income over ve years, moved orward by ve
years, and he average raio o business invesmen
o GDP or he preceding ve years. Ta is, a each
quarer along he x-axis, he gure shows he aver-
age level o invesmen and he average deb burdenve years earlier. Te inerpreaion is ha inves-
men oday ollows household deb burdens wih
abou a ve-year lag. Te wo series move in oppo-
sie direcions in gure 3 on page 11, which indicaes ha high deb burdens are
ollowed by low invesmen ve years laer, and ha low deb burdens are ollowed
by higher invesmen levels.
Te run-up in consumer deb levels during he boom years may hus explain, a
leas in par, he low business invesmen perormance o he curren economic
recovery. Te deb overhang rom he deb-boom years hus plays a criical role in
slowing consumpion and possibly invesmen growh and consequenly eco-
nomic growh and new hiring in he economic recovery aer June 2009.
Furhering aser household deleveraginggeting rid o deb relaive o aer-ax
incomehus becomes a policy imperaive even hough i is no he only cause
o he slow recovery. High unemploymen and lower sock porolio and housing
values are also holding consumpion growh back. High unemploymen means
ha people do no have enough income o spend and low sock and house values
means ha people ocus more on saving and less on spending.
Bu reducing household leverage will have posiive eedback efecs o lower
unemploymen and higher sock and house prices. Hiring will likely no acceler-
Figure 5
High household debt, low business investment
Debt service ratio and investment, 1989 to 2010
Percent (of GDP/PDI)
Quarter
9.5%
10.0%
10.5%
11.0%
11.5%
12.0%
12.5%
Dec89
Dec91
Dec93
Dec95
Dec97
Dec99
Dec01
Dec03
Dec05
Dec07
Dec09
Investment, 5-year average
Debt service ratio,5-yr avg, 5-yr lead
Notes: Investment is current investment. The debt service burden is the debt service burden recoearlier. The fgure thus shows how debt service burdens lead the way or business investment. Thage or the debt service burden is the average ratio, not the average o the debt service burden raAuthors calculations based on: Household Debt Service and Financial Obligations Ratios, availabederalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/; Bureau o Economic Analysis, National Income and Produ
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/;%20Bureau%20of%20Economic%20Analysis,%20National%20Income%20and%20Product%20Accountshttp://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/;%20Bureau%20of%20Economic%20Analysis,%20National%20Income%20and%20Product%20Accountshttp://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/;%20Bureau%20of%20Economic%20Analysis,%20National%20Income%20and%20Product%20Accounts8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
18/31
15 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
ae unless consumers sar o spend more and ha will no happen wihou lower,
susained deb burdens. Ta is, lowering households leverage will have a posiive
eedback o lower unemploymen and higher employmen.
Whas more, less household leverage will also mean less household economic
disressewer credi card deauls, ewer oreclosures, and ewer bankrup-cieswhich in urn should give banks an incenive o lend more again. Easier
access o morgages, or insance, should ranslae ino more demand or homes
and consequenly more sable home prices. Less leverage could hus have a
sabilizing eedback efec on household wealh, on saving and consumpion,
and hus on economic growh and hiring. Less leverage could creae a bene-
cial cycle, jus like he massive amoun o deb helped creae a hurricane o bad
economic news or he pas ew years.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
19/31
16 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Three pathways to deleveraging
Deb can become less burdensome in hree ways. Tere can be less deb, deb can
cos less due o lower ineres raes, and i may be easier or households o carry
he same amoun o deb i incomes rise. Les consider each pah in isolaion.
Reaching sustainable debt levels with slow debt growth alone
I would ake years, perhaps decades, o reach susainable household deb lev-els i we leave marke orces alone o solve he problem. Te mosly do-nohing
approach o deleveraging o he pas ew years shows ha his is associaed wih
remendous economic pain ha could las or many more years, especially since
curren economic circumsances may slow urher declines o household deb and
hus o he deb-o-aer-ax-income raio.
o be sure, households have already los a lo o deb. oal deb has allen by
$1.4 rillion (in 2011 dollars) rom is peak in lae 2007 o is mos recen bo-
om o $13.3 rillion in June 2011. Tis 9.4 percen decline o inaion-adjused
deb reecs boh enormous economic pain or households, which have los heir
homes due o oreclosure, ewer qualied borrowers due o high unemploymen,
sharply lower home values, and large credi consrains o amilies and businesses
alike as banks coninue o resric lending o many borrowers. Ye many qualied
borrowers, businesses, and households alike canno ge credi or desirable inves-
mens, and here are ewer qualied borrowers o begin wih. Te housing marke,
business invesmens, hiring, and he economy sufer as a resul.
I is clearly possible o coninue on his pah o shrinking he acual amoun o deb,
bu his will also mean ha he economy will be saddled wih slow growh andhigh unemploymen or a long period o ime. Te economy will only see sronger
growh i household deb levels reach susainable levels, dened as deb levels ha
do no cause crisis behavior among households, businesses, and banks. Households
will spend more, businesses will inves aser, and banks will become less resricive
in heir lending pracices once deb has reurned o susainable levels.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
20/31
17 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Tere is no clear measure o wha level o deb will be susainable. One reasonable
hreshold may be he poin a which deb equals aer-ax income again, meaning
when he raio o deb o aer-ax income is 100 percen. Anoher possible hreshold
or susainable deb levels may be he average deb level o he lae 1990s. Te iner-
es rae levels hen were comparable o wha we can expec in noncrisis imes, when
economic disress among households was manageable, alhough oen high, and eco-nomic growh hroughou he period rom December 1994 o March 2001 was solid.
Te average deb-o-aer-ax-income raio or his period was 89.1 percen, and any
deb level below his raio could poenially be considered susainable. Te hreshold
or susainable deb levels, hough, would likely be lower i ineres raes rose again
due o igher moneary policy or higher inaion. Mos imporanly, we are ar away
rom any o he hresholds discussed here since he raio o deb o aer-ax income
sood a 114.3 percen in June 2011. I will ake years i no decades o reach susain-
able levels o deb as able 2 (below) shows.
able 1 on page 4 shows a ew simple simulaions or possible pahs or deleveraging.
Te simulaions use hree diferen scenarios o model he raio o deb o aer-ax
income in he uure. Tis raio in he uure will depend on how as aer-ax income
and deb will grow. Tere are hree diferen ses o assumpions or deb growh bu all
o hem assume ha he average aer-ax-income growh rae remains he same across
all hree scenarios, wih an annual growh rae o 4 percen. Tere currenly is litle rea-
son o believe ha wihou susained policy inervenions, which are briey discussed
below, household income growh will accelerae beyond ha level.
Tis 4 percen growh rae is well below he hisoric average growh rae o 6.8
percen bu i is equal o he slow income growh o he pas year rom June 2010 o
Table 2
Three ways to speed reductions in household debt
Year of reaching sustainable levels of debt with continued deleveraging under
three select scenarios: do nothing, refinancing with lower interest rates, and
faster income growth
AssumptionsAfter-tax in-
come growth
Debt growth
Quarter, when
debt to after-
tax income
falls below 100percent for the
first time
Quarter, when
debt to after-
tax income
falls below 89.1percent for the
first time
Rapid deleveraging 4.0 -1.0 March 2014 June 2016
Flat return 4.0 0.0 December 2014 December 2017
Returning debt
growth4.0 3.0 December 2024 September 2036
Notes: All fgures are in percent. Sources: Calculations are based on: Federal Reserve Statistical Release Z.1 - Flow o Funds Accountso the United States; Bureau o Economic Analysis, National Income and Product Accounts.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
21/31
18 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
June 2011.20 Te assumed average deb growh rae is -1 percen in he rs
example o capure he coninuaion o rapid deleveraging.21 Te second scenario
assumes zero deb growh going orward o capure some easing o credi marke
condiions in he near erm. And he hird scenario allows or some deb growh
o reurn by assuming ha deb will increase annually by 4 percen, alhough his
deb growh rae is well below he hisoric average beore he crisis o 9 percen.22
able 2 shows ha i could ake years, i no decades, o reach susainable deb
levels. A he rae o deb declines o he pas ew yearsabou 1 percen annu-
allyi will ake unil June 2016 beore he raio o deb o aer-ax income
alls again o he average o he 1990s. And his is only he bes-case scenario.
All oher scenarios show ha i could ake a lo longer, possibly decades, beore
household leverage alls o susainable levels, paricularly i deb sars o grow
again, even i jus modesly.
Te Obama adminisraion made some efors o help homeowners renance heirmorgages bu wih only limied success. Te Obama adminisraion launched
is signaure iniiaive o address he oreclosure crisis, called Making Home
Afordable, in he spring o 2009.23 Making Home Afordable consised o wo
primary programs mean o help sruggling homeowners. Te rs was he Home
Afordable Morgage Program, or HAMP, which was designed o encourage
morgage servicers o provide loan modicaions o homeowners who are eiher
in deaul or a imminen risk o deaul. Te second was he Home Afordable
Renance Program, or HARP, which was designed o help homeowners who
are curren, bu a risk o delinquency, by allowing hem o renance ino odays
hisorically low raes. Wihou HARP homeowners would be disqualied rom
renancing because heir loan-o-value raioshe amoun o ousanding mor-
gages o he presen value o a housewere oo high because o home price drops.
Homeowners could iniially renance under HARP i heir loan-o-value raios
were less han 125 percen, assuming ha heir morgage was conorming o
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac sandards. Te Obama adminisraion announced
ha i would waive his cap on Ocober 24, 2011, allowing homeowners who are
deep underwaer o renance heir morgages as well. Homeowners who are sill
curren on heir morgage paymens bu who would no be able o renance dueo high loan-o-value raios ollowing sharp drops in house prices can heoreically
renance ino morgages wih much lower ineres raes han hey currenly have.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
22/31
19 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
A homeowner, or example, who owes $250,000 on a propery valued a $200,000
and who pays 5 percen on a morgage could heoreically ge a new morgage a a
rae much closer o he curren marke rae o 4 percen. Bu lenders oen charge
large upron ees o borrowers wih high loan-o-value raios, hus making HARP
less efecive han iniially anicipaed, as Sarah Rosen Warell, David Min, and
Jordan Eizenga o he Cener or American Progress poin ou.24
Boh HAMP and HARP atemped o reduce he monhly morgage paymens
o sruggling borrowers, and HAMP allowed or some mechanisms o reduce he
acual deb owed. None o hese major programs had he efec hoped because o
lower-han-expeced paricipaion and barriers o more widespread adopion lim-
ied paricipaion by borrowers. Te HAMP program regisered slighly more han
800,000 loan modicaions since is incepion in March 2009. Bu he HARP pro-
gram, which regisered close o 900,000 renances perormed since i began in March
2009, is he ocus o renewed atenion in he Obama adminisraion and Congress.
Te Obama adminisraion las monh unveiled some changes o he HARP
program o ry o spur more renances, wih he deails o come in November.25
Broadly, hough, he Federal Housing Finance Adminisraion, which regulaes
Fannie and Freddie (boh o which are in governmen conservaorship), plans o
reduce he upron coss or borrowers who are curren on heir morgages or he
previous six monhs and wan o renance heir morgages by:
Subsiuing cosly morgage appraisals wih so-called Auomaed Valuaion
Models used by he wo morgage gians o appraise morgages more cheaply
Waiving loan-level price adjusmens ha increase ineres raes or borrowers
wih higher loan-o-value raios
Easing he requiremen or represenaions and warranies abou borrowers
incomes when renancing
Allowing borrowers wih loan-o-value raios in excess o 125 percen o parici-
pae in HARP
Tese are imporan rs seps bu more could be done.
Specically, borrowers should be able o roll he cos o appraisals ino heir mor-
gage o reduce upron coss urher, and hey should be able o conduc a more
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
23/31
20 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
limied ile search when renancing. Lenders should be encouraged o paricipae
in HARP by reporing heir paricipaion raes in he program or perhaps being
required o mee cerain arges. And he Federal Housing Finance Adminisraion
should launch a major adverising campaign o reach eligible and newly eligible
homeowners in HARP.26All o his, ogeher wih he efors already underway,
could lead more homeowners o ake advanage o low ineres raes by renanc-ing and hus reducing heir morgage paymens. Homeowners would have more
resources available han is currenly he case, hus allowing hem o save more,
pay down heir oher deb more quickly, beter mainain heir consumpion, avoid
oreclosures, or all o he above.
Refinancing existing debt as a quick way to free up money for
consumption
Renancing deb ino less cosly deb is anoher alernaive ha would resul inaser deleveraging and i would help bring down oreclosures rom heir his-
orically high levels. Lower ineres paymens mean ha households have more
money available o repay heir ousanding principal more quickly. Te average
ineres rae on morgagesby ar he larges share o household debsood
a 4.3 percen in Augus 2011. Tis is down rom is las peak o 5 percen in
February 2011. I is also close o a record low, wih he lowes monhly average
rae since April 1971, when he Federal Reserve sared o collec hese daa, being
recorded in February 2010 wih 4.2 percen. Ineres raes edged somewha lower
oward 4 percen in Sepember 2011.27 Some downward movemen or all mor-
gages may hus sill be possible.
Wha would ha look like or a ypical borrower? Les assume a borrower ook
ou a 30-year, xed-rae morgage or $250,000 ve years ago. Les hen assume
he borrower could renance based on he hree diferen ineres raes
5 percen, 4.75 percen, 4.5 percenino a new 25-year morgage or anoher
30-year morgage o urher srech he paymens ino he uure. I his were pos-
sible hen hese large drops in ineres raes and he lenghening o he paymen
schedule would reduce he monhly paymen on he exising morgage.
able 3 (on nex page) shows wha ha range o opions would look like o a
homeowner looking o renance. Te savings rom renancing such a morgage
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
24/31
21 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
could be subsanial. A household ha originally ook ou a 30-year morgage a 5
percen renancing ino anoher 30-year morgage a 4 percen could save $2,952
annually, which reecs a cu o is monhly paymen by 18.3 percen. Tis is he
larges-possible savings in he scenarios presened in able 3, wih all oher cus
being smaller. Te scenarios do no assume any renancing ees, which could reduce
he benes o renancing iniially. Te scenarios are hus a bes-case oucome orborrowers. I he household used hese savings o pay back principal aser, hey
would shed an exra $16,000 in deb aer ve more years and owe 8 percen less
han i hey did no use he addiional savings or quicker loan repaymens.
Pu ye anoher way, a households deb-o-aer-ax burden could reach susain-
able levels more quickly, possibly several years earlier han oherwise would be he
case. Wih an annual growh rae o personal disposable income equal o 2 per-
cen, or insance, i would ake he household in his example anoher ve-and-a-
hal years o reach a raio o 89.1 percen o aer-ax incomeassuming ha he
household sars wih a raio o 114.3 percen and a curren morgage rae o 5 per-cen oday. Te household would ge o susainable deb levels 12 monhs aser,
aer renancing o a 4 percen ineres rae, sreching paymens or 30 years, and
using he addiional paymens o repay he principal aseNoes: All gures are in
dollars. Te original loan amoun is se equal o $250,000.
Lower morgage paymens hrough renancing could make a major diference in
household deb service and or our economic recovery i i occurred a a large-
enough scale. Te household deb service burden in June 2011 sood a 11.1
percen, already much lower han he record high o 14 percen in Sepember
2007.28 A drop in he deb service burden by anoher 10 percen would bring i o
9.9 percen, which would be he lowes burden on record going back o 1980.
Table 3
Three ways to lower the household debt burdenThe consequences of refinancing at lower interest rates under different assumptions
Original
interest rate
New monthly
payment
Remaining
principal after
five years
Old monthly
paymentAnnual savings
25-year
mortgage
30-year
mortgage
25-year
mortgage
30-year
mortgage
5 percent 229,572 1,342 1,212 1,096 1,560 2,952
4.75 percent 228,745 1,304 1207 1,092 1,164 2,544
4.5 percent 227,895 1,267 1203 1,088 768 2,148
Notes: All fgures are in dollars. The original loan amount is set equal to $250,000. Source: Authors calculations.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
25/31
22 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Lower deb paymens, especially or morgages, alone could have a benecial
efec on economic growh in he near ermeven i he addiional savings are
no used o repay morgage principal. Lower deb paymens could ree up more
money or consumpion and hus provide businesses wih an incenive o inves
more. A viruous cycle, whereby aser consumpion leads o more invesmen,
would resul in more hiring and hus more consumpion.
Many borrowers would ake advanage o hisorically low ineres raes and renance
heir exising deb, especially morgages, i hey could persuade heir lenders o do
so. Many lenders may be relucan o allow borrowers o renance since borrowers
may already owe more on heir houses han hey are worh, borrowers incomes may
have declined since hey rs ook ou he morgage due o he weak labor marke,
and lenders may have ighened lending sandards subsanially o proec hem-
selves in he wake o massive oreclosures. Incomes and housing values would have
o rise o make lenders less relucan o help homeowners renance.
Te seps recenly unveiled by he Obama adminisraion will help. Homeowners
who owe a lo o money relaive o he value o heir houses because house
prices have dropped so much in recen years may nd i easier o renance heir
morgages han is currenly he case. A homeowner who has a 5 percen, 30-year
morgage aken ou ve years ago in 2006 and who renances ino anoher 30-year
morgage a 4 percen may save close o $3,000 per year. (see able 3)
Indeed, much o he efeciveness o ederal housing nance policy will ulimaely
revolve around wheher and o wha exen he ederal governmen coninues o
play a major role in his area. Congressional Republicans in paricular have been
ouspoken abou heir belie ha he ederal conservaorship o Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac should end as quickly as possible, and ha hey should be replaced
wih privae sources o liquidiy in he secondary marke or home morgages
a marke where individual morgages are purchased in bulk and resold o insiu-
ional invesors a home and abroad. Te abiliy o policymakers o afec hous-
ing deb would be much more limied i his secondary marke did no direcly
involve Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which purchase and resell home morgages,
enabling morgage lenders o ofer new morgages o new borrowers.
Even he mos arden criics o he ederal governmens role in he morgage mar-
kes have empered heir calls or immediae privaizaion because o he conin-
ued weakness o he housing secor. In he absence o any obvious privae sources
o replace he $6 rillion in ousanding morgages currenly nanced by Fannie
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
26/31
23 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
and Freddie hrough heir purchases o morgages o be resold as morgage-backed
securiies, drasic acion on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is likely o be abled a leas
unil aer he 2012 elecion. Policymakers hus have an opporuniy o a leas empo-
rarily help homeowners renance heir morgages and hereby accelerae he decline
o households deb burdens by embracing he Obama adminisraions plan o enable
Fannie- and Freddie-guaraneed morgages o be renanced by individual morgage.
Faster income growth can lead to accelerated deleveraging
Te hird possibiliy is o encourage aser income growh han would oherwise
occur. Income can rise in a number o ways. People may ge more jobs, hey may ge
paid more, hey may receive a ax cu, and hey may ge higher social insurance pay-
mens, rom unemploymen insurance or rom Social Securiy. Presiden Obamas
proposed American Jobs Ac includes all o hese measures by:
Promoing more inrasrucure spending on schools (more jobs and hus more wages) Lowering payroll axes paid by employees and employers (more ake-home pay) Coninuing he exension o unemploymen insurance benes (more assisance)
able 4 uses he same deb reducion assumpions as in able 1 bu assumes annual
income growh equal o 7 percen insead o 4 percen or he average amily, which
could resul rom more jobs, lower axes, and more assisance, a leas emporarily.
Te efec is remarkable. I would ake 21 monhs less, or insance, han previously
calculaed o reach he average deb levels o he 1990s i deb coninued o all, and
i would ake wo-and-a hal years less o ge here i deb sayed a.
Table 4
Rising incomes means faster household debt reductionYear of reaching sustainable levels of debt with continued deleveraging with faster
income growth and three select scenarios
Assumptions
After-tax
income
growth
Debt
growth
Quarter, when debt to
after-tax income falls
below 100 percent for
the first time
Quarter, when debt
to after-tax income
falls below 89.1
percent for the
first time
Rapid deleveraging 7.0 -1.0 March 2013 September 2014
Flat debt 7.0 0.0 June 2013 March 2015
Returning debt growth 7.0 4.0 March 2016 December 2019
Source: Authors calculations.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
27/31
24 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Tese changes seem possible, a leas in he shor run, i Congress passes Presiden Obamas
proposed American Jobs Ac or similar measures ha arge job creaion hrough inrasruc-
ure spending, emporary ax cus or low-income and middle-income amilies, and ha boos
unemploymen insurance benes. Ta is, policymakers can emporarily boos incomes, hus
bringing leverage o susainable levels more quickly and hence bringing economic balance and
sronger economic growh back in he near erm.
Policymakers can emporarily boos incomes hrough emporary payroll ax cus and higher
unemploymen insurance paymens. And hey could boos jobs growh by creaing he condi-
ions or new hiring on ederally unded inrasrucure projecs. Tis could srenghen aer-ax
income growh, hopeully by several percenage poins, and hus reduce he household deb
burden o susainable levels poenially years sooner han would oherwise occur.
A ew more poins are worh considering in avor o emporarily boosing aer-ax income
growh and is link o deleveraging. Firs, he bigges deleveraging buck and hus he larges help
o he economy in he coming years or he policy inervenion buck could come rom empha-sizing help o middle-income amilieshose who were above he 20h percenile in income
in 2010 bu below he op quinile wih annual incomes o less han $100,065 bu more han
$20,000 in 2010.29 Te daa presened earlier show ha amilies in hese income caegories had
he larges deb-o-aer-ax-income raios when he crisis sared.
Second, emporary booss o aer-ax incomes are especially useul in helping households
deleverage aser. Lenders will remain relucan o ofer new deb a a as pace knowing ha he
aer-ax-income boos is emporary. Ta is, deb growh, beyond renancing exising deb, will
remain modes. Slower deb growh helps accelerae he decline in he deb-o-aer-ax-income
raio much more han modes deb growh, as shown in able 2 above.
Tird, booss o aer-ax income could help many heavily indebed households overcome em-
porary nancial sruggles such as a amily medical emergency or he las year o college uiion
or a son or daugher. Foreclosures may gradually decrease because households will become
less likely o have o choose beween paying heir bills and making heir morgage paymens,
and banks may end up holding ewer bad loans, which could ranslae ino an easing o lending
sandards or all borrowers, businesses, and households alike.
Te goal here is o nd he righ balance beween loosening overly igh credi markes andgraning excessive and ulimaely unsusainable credi. A boos in aer-ax incomes hrough
more jobs hanks o more inrasrucure spending, emporary ax cus, and unemploymen
insurance exensions, among ohers, may jus be he righ sep oward achieving his balance.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
28/31
25 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Conclusion
High household deb is puting he brakes on U.S. economic growh. Household deb
relaive o aer-ax income is sill higher han i was a any poin beore he middle o
2004even hough we have now experienced almos our years o unprecedened deb
declines due o a massive wave o oreclosures, among oher acors.
Te numbers clearly show ha i could ake several more years o enormous economic
pain or borrowers o lower heir household deb levels amid slow economic growh and
high unemploymen i we leave he decline in deb solely o marke orces. Waiing orhe combinaion o deb desrucion via home oreclosures and igh-sed lending o do
is job will keep he U.S. economy in a holding patern or years o come.
American amilies deserve beter. Policymakers should ry o nd a quicker and less
economically painul way ou o his deb mess. Te wo alernaives are lower deb pay-
mens hrough deb renancing and a lower deb burden by boosing aer-ax incomes.
Te numbers sugges ha boh renancing and emporary booss o aer-ax income
hanks o aser job creaion ollowing more inrasrucure spending, emporary ax cus,
and more unemploymen insurance benes could be very benecial.
Each sep could shave years of he painul deleveraging rek or sruggling home mor-
gage borrowers. Tese seps are hus worh a ry, paricularly since we already know ha
he alernaive is painully slow economic growh and high unemploymen. Congress
should pass he American Jobs Ac as a criical sep o help American amilies dig ou
rom heir crushing deb burden more quickly han would oherwise be he case.
About the author
Christian E. Weller is an associae proessor a he Deparmen o Public Policy and
Public Afairs, Universiy o Massachusets Boson, and a Senior Fellow a he Cener
or American Progress.
8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
29/31
26 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
Endnotes
1 Cacan aed n: brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts (Deparmen Cmmerce, 2011).
2 id.
3 De reer cred mare ae and excde andng axe and ecry cred rm rer. Arcacan aed n: Federa Reerve saca Reeae Z.1 - F Fnd Accn e uned sae, avaae ap://.ederareerve.gv/reeae/z1/.
4 Ar cacan aed n: brea lar sac, Current Employment Statistics (Deparmen lar, 2011).
5 te Mrgage baner Acan repr a e are mrgage n recre ared re rm a 0.99percen n Jne 2006. t are ad grn mre an 2 percen y e end 2007 and evenay exceeded 4 percenn a cnen a rm Jne 2009 Jne 2011. Prr e cr, e are mrgage n recre ad never eengreaer an 1.5 percen, gng ac 1979, en e daa ere ar. see: Mrgage baner Acan, Nana De-nqency srvey (2011). te are cred card a an re eac qarer ncreaed arpy drng e cr andexceeded 10 percen r r cnecve qarer rm sepemer 2009 Jne 2010. see: Carge-o and DenqencyRae n lan and leae a Cmmerca ban, avaae a p://.ederareerve.gv/reeae/carge/.
6 Ar cacan aed n: Federa Reerve saca Reeae Z.1 - F Fnd Accn e uned sae;brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts.
7 bran k. bc and er, Cange n u.s. Famy Fnance rm 2004 2007: Evdence rm e srvey CnmerFnance, Federal Reserve Bulletin 95 (2009): A1A55.
8 incme red are aen rm: hrca incme tae, avaae a p://.cen.gv/e//ncme/daa/rca/ed/ndex.m. De--ncme ra are cacaed ny r ed ed any de n e daayear. Ar cacan aed n: srvey Cnmer Fnance, avaae a p://.ederareerve.gv/ecnre-daa/c/cndex.m.
9 Cran E. weer, Need r wan: wa Expan e Rn up n Cnmer De?,Journal of Economic Issues 41 (2) (2007):583591.
10 incme red are aen rm: hrca incme tae, avaae a p://.cen.gv/e//ncme/daa/rca/ed/ndex.m. De--ncme ra are cacaed ny r ed ed any de n e daayear. Ar cacan aed n: srvey Cnmer Fnance, avaae a p://.ederareerve.gv/ecnre-daa/c/cndex.m.
11 weer, Need r wan.
12 te daa n Fgre 2 ve-year average. te qarery daa mve arnd a , c a averagng e ervanmae e ne mer eer rae e n deryng rend.
13 weer, Need r wan.
14 Cacan aed n: brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts;Federa Reerve saca
Reeae Z.1 - F Fnd Accn e uned sae.
15 Cacan aed n: brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts.
16 i mpran ne a e are mener eqy e a vae er me decreaed drng perd. hmener n average ned a recrd- 38.1 percen er me n eary 2 011. ta , mener ea, even g ey eer mrgage and ey p ne mney n er me. te expanan ae vae a me drpped rg e cr and e enng ecnmc recvery, eavng ed evere ea. Cacan, n n ere, aed n: hed De servce and Fnanca ogan Ra, avaae ap://.ederareerve.gv/reeae/ede/; brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts.
17 Cacan aed n: brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts.
18 A p ve-year average de ervce rden and ve-year gr rae nfan-adjed cnmpn ndeed me cnemprane crrean, c a de rden and cnmpn gr mve n ppe drecn. wende rden are g, cnmpn gr , and en de rden are , cnmpn gr reavey g.Cacan, n n ere, aed n: hed De servce and Fnanca ogan Ra, avaae a p://.ederareerve.gv/reeae/ede/; brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts.
19 Daa n de ervce rden g ac 1980, c a i can cacae cmpee ve-year average arng n 1985. teve-year average en nrdced a ve-year ead cmpare crren nvemen, c a e ere ar e a qarer 1989.
20 Aer-ax ncme gr cacaed aed n: brea Ecnmc Anay, National Income and Product Accounts. lng-erm average gr rae e gr rae rm Marc 1952 Decemer 2007, e a qarer ere e Grea Rece-n.
21 De gr cacaed aed n: Federa Reerve saca Reeae Z.1 - F Fnd Accn e uned sae.
22 id. lng-erm average gr rae e gr rae rm Marc 1952 Decemer 2007, e a qarer ere eGrea Recen.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scfindex.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/household/index.htmlhttp://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
30/31
27 Cener r Amercan Prgre | unrdenng Amerca Mdde Ca: srnng Fame De brden r Faer Gr
23 te majr prgram anced y e oama admnran rgve ed prncpa a een e sr Re prgramcreaed y e Federa hng Admnran n Ag 2010. t prgram encrage prvae ender renancenderaer mrgage, ere e mener e mre n e andng mrgage an e e r, aFhA-nred an, e prncpa redced a eve 97.75 percen an vae r er. brrer d re-ceve a ne mrgage mre ardae paymen and ey g rm avng negave eqy pve eqy prgram. te prgram a ad ny 305 r renance n ne year exence (and ny 891 appcan).see: FhA snge -Famy o, avaae a p://pra.d.gv/dpra/dcmen/ddc?d=0811.pd.
24 sara Ren ware, Davd Mn, and Jrdan Ezenga, Renancng A-R hmener: te hme Ardae Renanc-ng Prgram Can hep saze e hng Mare (wangn: Cener r Amercan Prgre, 2011).
25 Federa hng Fnance Agency, FhA, Fanne Mae and Fredde Mac Annnce hARP Cange Reac Mre brr-
er, Ne reeae, ocer 24, 2011.
26 ware, Mn, and Ezenga, Renancng A-R hmener.
27 inere rae daa rm: Federa Reerve saca Reeae h.15 - seeced inere Rae, avaae a p://.eder-areerve.gv/reeae/h15/.
28 hed De servce and Fnanca ogan Ra, avaae a p://ederareerve.gv/reeae/ede/dea.m.
29 te c- pn r e 20 and 80 percene e ncme drn are aen rm: brea e Cen,Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2010 (Deparmen Cmmerce, 2011).
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=ol0811.pdfhttp://federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/default.htmhttp://federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/default.htmhttp://federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/default.htmhttp://federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt/default.htmhttp://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=ol0811.pdf8/3/2019 Unburdening Americas Middle Class
31/31
The Center for American Progress is a nonpartisan research and educational institute
dedicated to promoting a strong, just and free America that ensures opportunity
for all. We believe that Americans are bound together by a common commitment to
these values and we aspire to ensure that our national policies reflect these values.
We work to find progressive and pragmatic solutions to significant domestic and
international problems and develop policy proposals that foster a government that
is of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Top Related