Trade Wars are Not Good, nor Easy to WinWASHINGTON HARDWOODS COMMISSIONAnnual SymposiumJune 13, 2019
Dr. Kent WheilerAssociate Professor and DirectorCenter for International Trade in Forest Products
2
3
2018
1969
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Trillion U.S. Dollars
Global GDP 1969 vs. 2018Rest of the World U.S.
U.S. is 24% of the total
The global GDP was less than $3 trillion in 1969. Today it is over $85 trillion.
U.S. is 38% of the total
This is a test
• In 2018 the United States imposed a 20% import tariff on Chinese washing machines, which led to:
a) deforestation in the Amazonb) higher lead content in the U.S. water supplyc) Sears declared bankruptcy d) the un-retirement of the Maytag repairman
4
5
6
7
8
0
2,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
8,000,000,000
10,000,000,000
12,000,000,000
14,000,000,000
16,000,000,000
2016 2017 2018 MAR 2018 YTD MAR 2019 YTD
US
Dol
larsU.S. Soybean Exports to China
March YTD is down 29% from 2018
2018 down 74% from 2017
Source: USA Trade Online (U.S. Census Bureau)
9
0
1,000,000,000
2,000,000,000
3,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
5,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
7,000,000,000
Washington Louisiana Illinois Ohio
US
Dolla
rsU.S. Soybean Exports to China
Top Four States
2016 2017 2018
Source: USA Trade Online (U.S. Census Bureau)
August 14, 2018
10
11
Tariffs 101• Tariffs are a tax on imported goods • Paid by the U.S. importer • Collected by U.S. Customs• Tax revenue for the U.S. Treasury
12
13
Individual Income Tax$1,698
Corporate Income Tax $216
Social Insurance Taxes$1,242
Excise Taxes $99
Customs Duties $70 Business Revenue
$49 Other Revenue $64
U.S. Federal Government Revenues FY 2019 $3.4 Trillion
• Tariffs provide 2% of Federal tax revenue • Est. $70 billion in 2019
14
The tariffs are not helping.
Who Pays the Tariff?• Tariffs are paid by the importer of record (e.g. WalMart)• Who ultimately “pays” depends on market conditions
• If the foreign supplier reduces prices by the amount of the tariff, they effectively pay
• If the supplier doesn’t reduce prices, either the importer cuts their profit margin (i.e. the importer pays) or they raise prices and the consumer pays
• If consumers pay the tariff via higher prices, it is a regressive form of taxation
• Often the supplier, importer and consumer share some portion of the tax
• Or the importer switches to a domestic or non-tariff foreign supplier
15
16
• A nearly complete passthrough of tariffs to the total price paid by importers suggests the tariff incidence has fallen largely on the US.
• Analyses of retail prices preliminarily shows the higher cost of imports passed through to consumers for some goods but absorbed by lower retailer profit margins for others.
• In contrast to imports, US exports subjected to retaliatory tariffs exhibited declines in their ex-tariff prices relative to equivalent but non-targeted goods.
17
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Princeton University, and Columbia University, respectivelyMarch 1, 2019
Trade Wars• A unilateral increase in tariffs is usually reciprocated• Domestic companies and non-targeted foreign suppliers
producing similar goods benefit, but…
18
19
Trade Wars• In war there are casualties on both sides
• Supply chains are disrupted• Consumer prices usually increase, and choice decreases• Investment is retarded• Non-tariff barriers increase• International trade is restrained• Distrust bred by the trade war spills into other areas• There will be unintended consequences
20
21
• China’s average tariff on U.S. imports is now 20.7% (up from 8%)
• China’s average tariff on everyone else is now down from 8% to 6.7%
22
Larry SummersA Revealing Puzzle in the China Tariffshttp://larrysummers.com/2019/05/15/theres-a-revealing-puzzle-in-the-china-tariffs/
• On Monday May 13, 2019, following news of increasing tariffs in the U.S.-China trade war, the Dow dropped 617 points or 2.4%. With a total value of U.S. stocks around $30 trillion, this decline represents more than $700 billion in lost wealth.
• The actual amount of the tariffs is a small fraction of this lost value.
• It is the greater risk of catastrophic medium-run outcomes, rather than the proximate impact of trade conflicts, that is driving the outsize market reactions to trade negotiation news.
• The current trade conflict is a possible prelude to a far larger conflict between the two nations with the largest economies and greatest power for as far as can be foreseen.
• A world where relations between the United States and China are largely conflictual could involve a breakdown of global supply chains, a splinternet (as separate, noninteroperable internets compete around the world), greatly increased defense expenditures and conceivably even military conflict. All of this would be catastrophic for living standards and would also have huge adverse effects on the value of global companies.
• It is risky to turn the pursuit of even vital national objectives into an existential crusade. Rather, even when nations haveobjectives that are in conflict, it is important to seek compromise, to avoid inflammatory rhetoric and to confine rather than enlarge the areas where demands are being made. Establishing credibility that promises will be kept and surprises will be avoided is as or more important with adversaries as with friends.
• There is no greater threat to the success of our national enterprise over the next quarter-century than mismanagement of the relationship with China. It is not just possible but essential to be strong and resolute without being imprudent and provocative.
23
Walter Russell MeadAmericans Aren’t Ready for Cold War IIThe Wall Street Journal, June 11, 2019
• Neither we nor the Chinese can predict the scale, scope or consequences of the emerging rivalry. • How will the competition affect Americans in their daily lives? • How will it change the technology and higher-education sectors? • What impact will cyber technology and other forms of asymmetrical warfare have on the balance of power? • Will the deep economic ties between the countries soften diplomatic and military competition -- or sharpen it?
• It's difficult to prepare for a contest with so many uncertainties, but the ancient Chinese strategist Sun Tzu offered advice that is still sound:
• If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. • If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. • If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
• Americans should start by deepening our understanding of how Beijing’s policy makers see themselves and the world.
• Red America, blue America and establishment America don't understand one another very well; the resulting division makes stable, long-term foreign policy hard to sustain. One of Washington's highest priorities should be creating an approach to China policy that can endure from one administration to the next.
• It's impossible to know how the marked shift in U.S.-China relations will develop. The clouds now assembling on the horizon could dissipate or build into a storm of historic proportions. Either way, it is past time for Americans to heed Sun Tzu's advice. We do not know either China or ourselves as well as we should.
24
Trade War Casualties
• Consumers• Farmers• Ports• Dock workers• Auto industry• etc. etc., and…
• The U.S. Hardwood Industry
25
26
Domestic Markets
54%Exports to China24%
Exports to the Rest of the World
22%
U.S. Hardwood Grade Lumber Consumption 2018
China is the Largest Market for U.S. Hardwoods
Source: American Hardwood Export Council
Chronology of the U.S.-China Trade War
27
DATE ACTION
Apr 7, 2017 Presidents Trump & Xi agree to a 100-day plan to address trade issues
Jan 22, 2018 U.S. imposes 30% tariff on imported solar panels, 20% on washing machines
Mar 23, 2018 U.S. imposes 25% tariff on imported steel, 10% on aluminum
Apr 2, 2018 China retaliates by imposing 15-25% tariffs on 128 U.S. products ($3 billion value)
Apr 3, 2018 U.S. announces 25% tariff on $50 billion of Chinese goods; China retaliates in proportion
July 6, 2018 U.S. implements 25% tariffs on $34 billion; $16 billion delayed; China retaliates in proportion
July 10, 2018 U.S. announces plans for 10% tariff on $200 billion of Chinese goods
Aug 1, 2018 President Trump instructs USTR to increase proposed tariff to 25% on $200 billion
Aug 3, 2018 China retaliates by announcing plans for tariffs of 5-25% on $60 billion of U.S. goods
Aug 23, 2018 Both U.S. & China implement 25% tariffs on remaining $16 billion announced in April
Sep 7, 2018 President Trump threatens tariffs on remaining $267 billion as yet untargeted Chinese goodsUp to this point there is a looming threat, but no tariffs on hardwood logs or lumber have been implemented.
Chronology of the U.S.-China Trade War
28
DATE ACTION
Sep 24, 2018 U.S. imposes 10% tariff on $200 billion of Chinese goods; will increase to 25% on January 1.China retaliates with 5-10% on $60 billion.
China’s tariffs include 10% on N.A. hardwood logs, 10% on Oak, Cherry & Ash lumber, and 5% on Maple, Walnut, Poplar, and Alder lumber.
Dec 1, 2018 January 1 deadline is extended 90 days.
Feb 24, 2019 Deadline is postponed again.
May 5, 2019 President Trump declares that the 10% tariffs will be increased to 25% effective May 10, and that his administration will impose new tariffs of 25% on all remaining Chinese goods.
May 10, 2019 U.S. increases tariffs to 25% on Sep 24 targeted items ($200 billion) that were at 10%.
June 1, 2019 China retaliates by increasing tariffs on $60 billion of U.S. goods up to 25%.
Oak logs and lumber increased from 10% to 25%.
N.A. hardwood logs, Cherry & Ash lumber increased from 10% to 20%.
Maple, Walnut, Poplar, and Alder lumber stays at 5%.
Chinese Currency to U.S. Dollar
29
China’s currency has depreciated 5-9% during the ”trade war”, offsetting some of tariff impact for exporters, but compounding the penalty for hardwood lumber (and other) importers.
30
17.3% drop in volume
31
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Oak Ash Cherry Alder Maple
Mill
ion
US
Dolla
rs
U.S. Hardwood Lumber Exports to China2017 2018
Down 17%
Down 17% Up
6% Down 23% Down
13%
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
32
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
US
Dolla
rs/C
ubic
Met
erU.S. Hardwood Lumber Exports to China
Average Monthly Unit Value (US$/m3)Cherry Maple Ash Oak Yellow Poplar Western Red Alder
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
33
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 JAN
FEB
MAR APR
MAY JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Cubi
c M
eter
s
US Hardwood Lumber Exports to ChinaBlue Columns = 2018 Red Line = 2019 YTD
Source: Global Trade AtlasDown 39.8%
34
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Oak Ash Cherry Alder Maple
Mill
ion
US
Dolla
rs
U.S. Hardwood Lumber Exports to ChinaMarch 2018 YTD vs March 2019 YTD
2018 2019
Down 43%
Down 40%
Down 27% Down
33% Down 58%
10% Tariff 5% Tariff
Tariff as of June 1, 2019: 25% 20% 20% 5% 5%
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
35
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 JAN
FEB
MAR APR
MAY JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Cubi
c M
eter
s
US Hardwood Logs Exports to ChinaBlue Columns = 2018 Red Line = 2019 YTD
Source: Global Trade AtlasDown 48.3%
36
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 JAN
FEB
MAR APR
MAY JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Cubi
c M
eter
s
US Softwood Lumber Exports to ChinaBlue Columns = 2018 Red Line = 2019 YTD
Source: Global Trade Atlas Down 67%
37
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
Alder Maple Oak Ash
US
Dolla
rs
Exports of Hardwood Lumber through Washington Ports
2017 2018
Data source: USA Trade Online (U.S. Census Bureau)
38
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
Alder Maple Oak Ash
US
Dolla
rs
Exports of Hardwood Lumber through Washington Ports
March YTD 2018 March YTD 2019
Down 44%
Data source: USA Trade Online (U.S. Census Bureau)
39
China (incl. Hong Kong)58%
European Union 10%
Canada 10%
Mexico 4%
All Other Markets18%
U.S. Hardwood Lumber Exports to "Trade War" Countries
No Other Markets Can Absorb the China Volume
Source: American Hardwood Export Council
But in addition, the U.S. has ongoing trade disputes with the largest of our alternative markets.
40
Frank StewartExecutive DirectorW.Va. Forestry Assoc.
41
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 JAN
FEB
MAR APR
MAY JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Cubi
c M
eter
s
US Hardwood Lumber Exports to MexicoBlue Columns = 2018 Red Line = 2019 YTD
Source: Global Trade Atlas
42
43
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 JAN
FEB
MAR APR
MAY JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Cubi
c M
eter
s
US Hardwood Lumber Exports to Vietnam
Blue Columns = 2018 Red Line = 2019 YTD
Source: Global Trade Atlas
What the U.S. gained in export volume to Vietnam in 2018 is one tenth of what we lost in China.
44
45
46
47
48
Editorial, May 17, 2019• Hardwood lumber exports to Asia in the last half of 2018 were back down to
2014-2015 levels, and first-quarter totals this year were the lowest in at least the last 21 quarters.
• Shipments to Asia from 2016 through mid-2018 averaged 20 mmbf higher per month than in 2014 and 2015. That’s 600 million additional board feet (50,000 more containers) than at the current or the 2014-2015 pace.
• Splitting a 5% or 10% tariff was a workable solution for many American suppliers and their Chinese buyers, but splitting a 25% tariff will not be.
• Higher domestic demand will help during the summer, but the best option for the 20 mmbf/month that is no longer shipping to China is to not make it.
• As such, absent a quick resolution to the trade dispute, the summer doldrums are coming early and heavy this year. Overproduction is likely again, for the first time in years, and Red Oak will be the hardest hit.
49
50
Last year I encouraged you to plant more alder because China will be a good and growing market for it. I still believe that. But we have got to convince our political leaders that the hardwood industry should not be the sacrificial casualty of the trade war.
51
52
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
01/2
014
02/2
014
03/2
014
04/2
014
05/2
014
06/2
014
07/2
014
08/2
014
09/2
014
10/2
014
11/2
014
12/2
014
01/2
015
02/2
015
03/2
015
04/2
015
05/2
015
06/2
015
07/2
015
08/2
015
09/2
015
10/2
015
11/2
015
12/2
015
01/2
016
02/2
016
03/2
016
04/2
016
05/2
016
06/2
016
07/2
016
08/2
016
09/2
016
10/2
016
11/2
016
12/2
016
01/2
017
02/2
017
03/2
017
04/2
017
05/2
017
06/2
017
07/2
017
08/2
017
09/2
017
10/2
017
11/2
017
12/2
017
01/2
018
02/2
018
03/2
018
04/2
018
05/2
018
06/2
018
07/2
018
08/2
018
09/2
018
10/2
018
11/2
018
Cubi
c M
eter
sU.S. Imports of Hardwood Plywood
World China
Preliminary CVD announced in April 2017
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Nov YTD
U.S. Hardwood Plywood Imports Sources of SupplyIndonesia China Russia Canada Vietnam Malaysia Cambodia
Preliminary CVD on Chinese hardwood plywood was announced in April 2017
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
01/2
014
02/2
014
03/2
014
04/2
014
05/2
014
06/2
014
07/2
014
08/2
014
09/2
014
10/2
014
11/2
014
12/2
014
01/2
015
02/2
015
03/2
015
04/2
015
05/2
015
06/2
015
07/2
015
08/2
015
09/2
015
10/2
015
11/2
015
12/2
015
01/2
016
02/2
016
03/2
016
04/2
016
05/2
016
06/2
016
07/2
016
08/2
016
09/2
016
10/2
016
11/2
016
12/2
016
01/2
017
02/2
017
03/2
017
04/2
017
05/2
017
06/2
017
07/2
017
08/2
017
09/2
017
10/2
017
11/2
017
12/2
017
01/2
018
02/2
018
03/2
018
04/2
018
05/2
018
06/2
018
07/2
018
08/2
018
09/2
018
10/2
018
11/2
018
Cubi
c M
eter
sU.S. Imports of Hardwood Plywood
Vietnam volume up 25,000 m3/month
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,60001
/201
402
/201
403
/201
404
/201
405
/201
406
/201
407
/201
408
/201
409
/201
410
/201
411
/201
412
/201
401
/201
502
/201
503
/201
504
/201
505
/201
506
/201
507
/201
508
/201
509
/201
510
/201
511
/201
512
/201
501
/201
602
/201
603
/201
604
/201
605
/201
606
/201
607
/201
608
/201
609
/201
610
/201
611
/201
612
/201
601
/201
702
/201
703
/201
704
/201
705
/201
706
/201
707
/201
708
/201
709
/201
710
/201
711
/201
712
/201
701
/201
802
/201
803
/201
804
/201
805
/201
806
/201
807
/201
808
/201
809
/201
810
/201
811
/201
8
US$
/Cub
ic M
eter
sU.S. Imports of Hardwood Plywood: Dollars/Cubic Meter
World Average Vietnam
Rapid fall in the price of imports from Vietnam
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
01/2
014
02/2
014
03/2
014
04/2
014
05/2
014
06/2
014
07/2
014
08/2
014
09/2
014
10/2
014
11/2
014
12/2
014
01/2
015
02/2
015
03/2
015
04/2
015
05/2
015
06/2
015
07/2
015
08/2
015
09/2
015
10/2
015
11/2
015
12/2
015
01/2
016
02/2
016
03/2
016
04/2
016
05/2
016
06/2
016
07/2
016
08/2
016
09/2
016
10/2
016
11/2
016
12/2
016
01/2
017
02/2
017
03/2
017
04/2
017
05/2
017
06/2
017
07/2
017
08/2
017
09/2
017
10/2
017
11/2
017
12/2
017
01/2
018
02/2
018
03/2
018
04/2
018
05/2
018
06/2
018
07/2
018
08/2
018
09/2
018
10/2
018
11/2
018
12/2
018
Cubi
c M
eter
sChina Exports of Hardwood Plywood to Vietnam
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
58
Plaintiff
59
“The faking of origin and the illegal transshipment of goods happens most often in the sectors of textiles, seafood, agricultural products, tiles, honey, steel and iron, aluminum and timber products,” Vietnamese Customs said in a statement.
June 9, 2019
October 2013: S. Korea imposes 4-38% antidumping duties on Chinese plywood
60
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Cubi
c M
eter
sChina and Vietnam Plywood Trade with S. Korea
China Exports to S. Korea S. Korea Imports from Vietnam
Data source: Global Trade Atlas
Thank you!
61
APPENDIX
62
63
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 JAN
FEB
MAR APR
MAY JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Billio
n US
$
US Wood Furniture Imports from ChinaBlue Columns = 2018 Red Line = 2019 YTD
Source: Global Trade Atlas Down 16.3%
USMCA vs. NAFTA
• The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) studied the proposed U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA).
• They concluded that the USMCA will raise U.S. real GDP by 0.35% and increase U.S. jobs by 0.12% compared to the status quo.
64
Bush Obama Trump
66
-50,000
50,000
150,000
250,000
350,000
450,000
550,000
650,000
Canada Mexico China Japan U.K. Germany S. Korea Netherlands Brazil Hong Kong France
Mill
ion
U.S
. Dol
lars
U.S. Merchandise Trade in 2018Arranged in order of largest exports (from left to right)
Imports Exports Deficit
67
-50,000
50,000
150,000
250,000
350,000
450,000
550,000
650,000
China Mexico Canada Japan Germany S. Korea U.K. Ireland Italy India France
Mill
ion
U.S
. Dol
lars
U.S. Merchandise Trade in 2018Arranged in order of largest imports (from left to right)
Imports Exports Deficit
68
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
China Mexico Germany Japan Ireland Vietnam Italy Malaysia India Thailand Canada
Mill
ion
U.S
. Dol
lars
U.S. Merchandise Trade in 2018Arranged in order of largest deficit (from left to right)
Imports Exports Deficit
69
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Mill
ion
US
Dolla
rs
U.S. Merchandise Trade with CanadaExports Imports
NAFTA signed December 8, 1993
70
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Mill
ion
US
Dolla
rs
U.S. Merchandise Trade with MexicoExports Imports
NAFTA signed December 8, 1993
71
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Mill
ion
US
Dolla
rs
U.S. Merchandise Trade with ChinaExports Imports
China joins WTO December 11, 2001
72
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Mill
ion
US
Dolla
rs
U.S. Merchandise Trade with JapanExports Imports
73
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Mill
ion
US
Dolla
rs
U.S. Merchandise Trade with the E.U.Exports Imports
President Bush President Obama Pres Trump
President Bush President Obama Pres Trump
President Bush President Obama Pres Trump$27.77/hr
President Obama President Trump
President Bush President Obama President Trump
President Bush President Obama Pres Trump
Top Related