Download - Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Transcript
Page 1: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Topology Optimisation of

Tertiary Structures and Mass

Savings for Satellite Structures

Mouriaux Franck

Senior Manager Engineering & Development

RUAG Schweiz AG

RUAG Space

Münich, 26.06.2014

Page 2: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Content

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 2

Objective

Bracket

Work

Optimisation Setup

Model Size

Geometry Generation

Comparison

Summary

Improvement

Page 3: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Objective

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 3

Design space,Loads and

ConstraintsPrinting

Designevaluation

StructuralAnalysis

Construction ManufacturingDesign space,

Loads and Constraints

Optimization

Compare current design against optimised design using ALTAIR

Optistruct

Time

Mass

Stress

Page 4: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Bracket

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 4

Upper S-Band Antenna Support of the Sentinel-1 Satellite

Material Aluminium

Mass-Bracket 1.626kg

Mass-Antenna 0.783kg

Dimensions 385x345x115 mm

1.Eigenfrequency >70Hz

Static Load 20g / 25g

Allowable Stress 163MPa

Page 5: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Outer dimensions of the existing

bracket => Design space

Antenna represented as a

concentrated mass and

connected with RBE3.

Provision for attachment bolts

accessibility

02.07.2014 5 │RUAG Space│

Bracket

Page 6: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

First optimization setup

Objective

Minimize Massfrac

Constraints

First eigenfreq. > 70Hz

v.M. stress < 163MPa

Problem

Very low and unrealistic eigenfrequencies

=> no feasible design

02.07.2014 6 │RUAG Space│

Optimisation Setup

Page 7: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Second optimization setup

Objective

Minimize compliance

Constraints

First eigenfreq. > 70Hz

Mass fraction < 0.4…0.05

Note

Running the optimization with different mass fraction constraints will

lead to different stress levels.

=> Multiple runs are needed to find a suitable stress level.

02.07.2014 7 │RUAG Space│

Optimisation Setup

Page 8: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 8

Full design space: 11.6kg.

Mass fraction: 0.09

Element size: 3mm

Model Size: 300’000 nodes.

No thin membranes possible

Model Size

Page 9: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Two optimization loops

02/07/2014 │RUAG Space│ 9

Meshing the

whole design

space

Loop #1

Target mass

of 4.5kg

Delete

unnecessary

elements and

remesh with

smaller

elements

Loop #2

Target mass

of 1.2kg

Model Size

Page 10: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

02.07.2014 10 │RUAG Space│

Optimised Model

Page 11: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

First automatic geometry generation (OSSmooth)

Further manual cleaning needed (ATOS, Geomagic)

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 11

Before cleaning After cleaning

Geometry Generation

Page 12: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

02/07/2014 │RUAG Space│ 12

Thin bridges Unnecessary parts

Geometry Generation

Page 13: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Geometry

02/07/2014 │RUAG Space│ 13

Page 14: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Comparison

Current Design Optimised Design

Time 3-4 Days 4-5 Days

Mass 1.6 kg 1.0 kg

Eigenfrequency 89 Hz 140 Hz

v.M. Stress 75 MPa ~90 MPa

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 14

Page 15: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Summary

Mass reduced by 35%

Key Problems

Compromise between acceptable model size and element size

Effort for cleaning the geometry

Need for interpretation and manual work

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 15

Page 16: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Improvement

Better smoothing of «big steps» by OSSmooth

Checking of unnecessary parts by OSSmooth

Automatic mesh refinement

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 16

Page 17: Topology Optimisation of Tertiary Structures and Mass Savings for Satellite Structures

Thank you for your attention!

02.07.2014 │RUAG Space│ 17