TheTrumpetAfricans now have a voice... FFounded in 1995VO L 22 NO 413 AP R I L 27 - MAY 10 2016 TheTrump et
#TrumpetAt21- 21 years of
publishing andwaxing stronger
Our Service is a true Air Freight Door-to-Door Service - Your goods arecollected from your door, anywhere in the UK, Goods are packed suitable forExport, Shipped, Cleared through Custom and delivered safely to your door
anywhere in Nigeria and many other destinations in West Africa.AIR & SEA PORT TO PORT EXPRESS COURIER
T: 020 8150 3780 E: [email protected]
W: www.infinitylogistics.co.uk
Shipping-Groupage Door to Door Air Import & Export
Ayear after the World
Health Assembly
resolved to eliminate
malaria from at least 35
countries by 2030, WHO has
released a World Malaria Day
report that shows this goal,
although ambitious, is
achievable.
In 2015, all countries in the
WHO European Region
reported, for the first time,
zero indigenous cases of
malaria, down from 90 000
cases in 1995. Outside this
region, 8 countries reported
Continued on Page 3>
The death toll from last
weekend’s attack carried
out by South Sudanese
gunmen in Ethiopia has risen to
208 people. The toll of the
wounded has also risen to 75
people while 108 children have
been kidnapped, according to an
Ethiopian official.
The attack took place in the
Gambela region which,
alongside a neighbouring
province, hosts more than
284,000 South Sudanese
refugees who fled conflict in
their country.
A Reuters report notes that
Cross-border cattle raids have
occurred in the same area in the
past, often involving Murle
tribesmen from South Sudan’s
Jonglei and Upper Nile regions -
areas awash with weapons that
share borders with Ethiopia.
Previous attacks, however, were
smaller in scale.
The gunmen are not believed
to have links with South
Sudanese government troops or
rebel forces who fought the
government in Juba in a civil
war that ended with a peace deal
signed last year.
STALLIONS AIR
Ipanema Travel Ltd
NIGERIA from £489XCELLENT WORLDWIDEOOFFFFEERRSS AALLSSOO AAVVAAIILLAABBLLEE
Please Call 4 Cheap Xmas Fares
020 7580 599907979 861 455
Call AMIT / ALEX
73 WELLS ST, W1T 3QG
All Fares SeasonalATOL 9179
Mosquito net -Fabian Biasio
Ethiopiadeath tollhits 208fromSouthSudanattack
Ending Malaria by 2030achievable
Page2 TheTrumpet APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
zero cases of the disease in 2014:
Argentina, Costa Rica, Iraq, Morocco,
Oman, Paraguay, Sri Lanka and United
Arab Emirates.
Another 8 countries each tallied fewer
than 100 indigenous malaria cases in 2014.
And a further 12 countries reported
between 100 and 1000 indigenous malaria
cases in 2014.
The “Global Technical Strategy forMalaria 2016-2030”, approved by the
World Health Assembly in 2015, calls for
the elimination of local transmission of
malaria in at least 10 countries by 2020.
WHO estimates that 21 countries are in a
position to achieve this goal, including 6
countries in the African Region, where the
burden of the disease is heaviest.
Shining a spotlight on countries
moving toward elimination of malaria
“Our report shines a spotlight on
countries that are well on their way to
eliminating malaria,” said Dr Pedro
Alonso, Director of the WHO Global
Malaria Programme. “WHO commends
these countries while also highlighting the
urgent need for greater investment in
settings with high rates of malaria
transmission, particularly in Africa. Saving
lives must be our first priority.”
Since the year 2000, malaria mortality
rates have declined by 60% globally. In the
WHO African Region, malaria mortality
rates fell by 66% among all age groups and
by 71% among children under 5 years.
The advances came through the use of
core malaria control tools that have been
widely deployed over the last decade:
insecticide-treated bed-nets, indoor
residual spraying, rapid diagnostic testing
and artemisinin-based combination
therapies.
But reaching the next level -
elimination - will not be easy. Nearly half
of the world’s population, 3.2 billion
people, remain at risk of malaria. Last year
alone, 214 million new cases of the disease
were reported in 95 countries and more
than 400,000 people died of malaria.
The efficacy of the tools that secured
the gains against malaria in the early years
of this century is now threatened.
Mosquito resistance to insecticides used in
nets and indoor residual spraying is
growing. So too is parasite resistance to a
component of one of the most powerful
anti-malarial medicines. Further progress
against malaria will likely require new
tools that do not exist today, and the
further refining of new technologies.
Last year, for the first time, the
European Medicines Agency issued a
positive scientific opinion on a malaria
vaccine. In January 2016, WHO
recommended large-scale pilot projects of
the vaccine in several African countries,
which could pave the way for wider
deployment in the years ahead.
Strong political commitment and
funding are vital
“New technologies must go hand in
hand with strong political and financial
commitment,” Dr Alonso added.
Vigorous leadership by the
governments of affected countries is key.
Governments must strengthen surveillance
of cases to identify gaps in coverage and
be prepared to take action based on the
information received. As countries
approach elimination, the ability to detect
every infection becomes increasingly
important.
Reaching the goals of the “GlobalTechnical Strategy” will require a steep
increase in global and domestic funding -
from $2.5 billion today to an estimated
$8.7 billion annually by 2030.
Through robust financing and political
will, affected countries can speed progress
towards malaria elimination and contribute
to the broader development agenda as laid
out in the “2030 Agenda for SustainableDevelopment”.
In a related development, the
International Organization for Migration
(IOM) also lent its voice to the campaign
to “End Malaria For Good.”
Director of IOM’s Migration Health
Division - Dr. Davide Mosca said: “In all
stages of migration - at origin, in transit, at
destination and upon return - migrants and
mobile populations may face
marginalization and poor access to health
care services, reducing the effectiveness of
malaria control and prevention strategies.
Malaria control strategies often fail to
account for migrant populations and their
specific needs, for example as hard-to-
reach or crises-affected populations.
Factors relating to migrants’ living,
working and transit conditions increase
their likelihood of being infected with
malaria.”
“Population movement makes
migrants and communities vulnerable to
acquiring or introducing malaria at their
places of origin, transit or destination. In
addition, exposure to new strains of the
disease in the areas they pass through can
result in higher morbidity and mortality for
migrants,” he added.
IOM has been implementing malaria
programmes in several countries around
the world, providing services to migrant
beneficiaries and technical support, as well
as capacity building for national and local
partners.
Examples include: provision of health
education, long-lasting insecticide-treated
net (LLINs) distribution, rapid diagnostics
and treatment in nine Myanmar townships
with high rates of migration and
artemisinin resistance; malaria services
along border provinces with LLINs
distribution, capacity building for
behaviour change agents and community
health workers in Thailand; mobility
tracking for migrants in Vietnam; technical
support to such initiatives as the
Elimination-8 in Southern Africa; a new
project in Paraguay with special focus on
mobile populations and epidemiological
services to avoid reintroduction of malaria.
“IOM stands ready to work closely
with WHO and other UN agencies,
governments and NGO partners, as well as
migrant communities and affected
populations, to ensure that the needs and
vulnerabilities of migrants and mobile
populations are addressed in achieving the
malaria targets,” said Dr Mosca.
Page3TheTrumpetAPRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
News
Ending Malaria by 2030 achievableContinued from Page 1<
Distribution of impregnated mosquitos bed nets at Agna village in Dikhil, Djbouti in 2013 (Picture - IOM)
IOM nurse doing malaria testing on a young girl in Malakal Protection of Civilians POC) camp, South Sudan 2014
Work in progress to end Malaria by 2030 (Picture by WHO - S. Hollyman)
The 8th African Comedy Festival
holds at different local venues
across the UK from May 6 to June
24 and ends with a grand event on June
25 at the Copper Box Arena in the Queen
Elizabeth Olympic Park.
11 top international African
comedians from different parts of the
continent will feature during the festival
organised by E&C Global Entertainment.
The line-up features Tumi Morake
(South Africa), Gordons (Nigeria), Eric
Omondi (Kenya), DKB (Ghana),
Meskerem (Ethiopia), Alex (Uganda),
GH Wiilwall (Somalia), Long John
(Zimbabwe), Brother Franklyn (Kenya)
and guest comedians Prince Ezikah and
MOG.
The African Comedy Festival is part
of the African Comedy Show - a monthly
event that has been running for the past 8
years in London. The African Comedy
Show has become an enormously popular
destination for
hearing African comedy from around
the world.
The African Comedy Show has
hosted top comedians such as world
famous Comedy Central Daily Show host
Trevor Noah, Andi Osho (BBC Live at
the Apollo / Channel 4 comedy); Paul
Shuddery (BBC Live at the Apollo /
Channel 4 comedy); and many more.
Heavyweight champion - Anthony
Joshua is a regular attendee at the
monthly event.
The Copper Box Arena is operated by
charitable social enterprise GLL, on
behalf of London Legacy Development
Corporation. After hosting handball,
modern pentathlon, fencing and goalball
during the 2012 Games, the
Copper Box Arena is now one of
London’s most versatile and exciting
events venues - open to the public as a
fully-equipped, 80-station gym. As part
of its London 2012 Legacy
commitments, the Copper Box Arena
also delivers a diverse and plentiful
grassroots sports programme for the local
community. In 2015, the Copper Box
Arena won the accolade for New Event
Space at the National Event Awards.
Page4 TheTrumpet
TheTrumpet Group
Tel: 020 8522 6600Field: 07956 385 604
E-mail: [email protected]
TheTrumpetTeam
PUBLISHER / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF:
’Femi OkutuboAG. EDITOR:
Emeka Asinugo, KSC
EDITORIAL ASSISTANT
Kimberly Ward
CONTRIBUTORS:
Moji Idowu, Ayo Odumade, Steve Mulindwa
SPECIAL PROJECTS:Odafe Atogun
John-Brown Adegunsoye (Abuja)ESSEX BUREAU:
Olufemi IbiwoyeBusiness Development Manager
DESIGN:[email protected]
ATLANTA BUREAU CHIEF:
Uko-Bendi Udo3695 F Cascade Road #2140 Atlanta,
GA 30331 USATel: +1 404 889 3613
E-mail: [email protected]
BOARD OF CONSULTANTS
CHAIRMAN:
Pastor Kolade Adebayo-OkeMEMBERS:
Tunde Ajasa-Alashe Allison Shoyombo, Peter Osuhon
TheTrumpet (ISSN: 1477-3392)is published in London fortnightly
Advertising:
020 8522 6600
APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
THINKINGOFWRITINGA BUSINESSPLAN?We can help you develop aprofessional business planfrom only £250.
For more information, contact usat 07402792146 or email us at:[email protected]
Fashion Design &Tailoring Sevices
Sewing Male, Female and Children African
Outfits includingEmbroidery
Field Contact:
07985 444 550
African Comedy Festivalkicks off May 6
News
This space is for sale at£120 +VAT (black & white)
£144 +VAT (colour)(60mm x 2 columns)
Nigerians in the Diaspora and
Nigerian investors abroad who
need a reliable and trustworthy
“eye” in Nigeria over their investments
or home-coming plans, can turn to
Meristem Diaspora Trust, a product from
Meristem Trustees Limited. The
company assures that “trust issues are no
longer worrisome issues for Nigerians in
Diaspora with the launch of Meristem
Diaspora Trust.”
Guest Speaker at the launch,
Honourable Abike Dabiri-Erewa - former
House Committee Chairman on Diaspora
Matters and current Senior Special
Adviser to The President on Diaspora and
Foreign Affairs, endorsed the product at
the event while validating the importance
of this long-sought solution for Nigerian
investors abroad.
Meristem Diaspora Trust is here to
replace the fear often faced by people -
with peace of mind. With Meristem
Diaspora Trust, the responsibility of
managing investments is transferred to
Meristem Trustees who represents and
protects the interests of the owner.
Meristem Diaspora Trust is for
Nigerians in the Diaspora who desire
some level of investments at home whilst
still abroad. This ranges from those who
are searching for companies to invest in,
financial investments to pursue, estate
and building projects and execution of
projects that require manpower or other
resources etc.
Benefits of the Meristem Diaspora
Trust includes:
• Strict adherence to the Trust Deed.
• Professionalism is assured
• It relieves settlor of any stress and
anxieties often experienced in
undertaking investment at home whist
abroad.
• The investment is assured in line with
your desires.
• Flexible exit option
• The settlor is kept abreast by periodic
reporting on the investment.
• Strict adherence as Meristem Trustees
is regulated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC).
Further information is available by
calling:
+44 (0)7961 939252 (UK) or +234
(0)80 6466 1104 (Nigeria).
Or visiting:
www.meristemtrustees.com/diasporat
rust
Or Emailing:
Page5TheTrumpetAPRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
News
Abike Dabiri-Erewa endorses MMeerriisstteemmDDiiaassppoorraa TTrruusstt
Page6 TheTrumpet APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
Page7TheTrumpetAPRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016GAB Awards
Fashion at the GAB Awards
Page8 TheTrumpet APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016 Places
Asunset is one of those
intangible things that make
us upbeat in our
connections. It is often associated
with romance and in other instances
with the end of something. It is a ray
of hope, that today’s worries are
gone and a brighter tomorrow
awaits us. For Mattie Stepanek,
“Sunset is still my favorite color,
and rainbow is second”.
Jovago.com, Africa’s leading
online hotel booking website,
assorts 5 beautiful sunsets in Africa
(in no particular order) that will
leave you in awe.
Cape Town, South Africa
Credit: SMCTImagine stumbling into this view on
the shores of the beautiful Cape
Town in South Africa. Chances are
that the hypnotizing effect is likely
to make you forget you were en
route to some other place.
Kenya
Credit: all4desktop.comEven the birds of the air enjoy this
heavenly sunset that is a mixture of
orange and red, giving it a
sweltering look. What then would
stop you from enjoying such a rare
sight?
Bojo Beach, Ghana
Credit: Bell Africana DigestAfter a day‘s hard work, there is
nothing more comforting for a
fisherman in Bojo Beach, Ghana,
than to row their boat under the
reflection of a beautiful sunset.
Then, they would forget their
weariness and anticipate a relaxed
evening, enjoying their hard earned
meal.
Madagascar
Credit: pixabay.comYou probably have watched
Madagascar; I am talking about the
cartoon. The beautiful sunsets in this
country are probably one of the
many reasons this animation was
shot in the island nation off the
southeast coast of Africa. Combined
with leisurely beaches and reefs, the
feeling of infinity is what you will
no doubt get here.
Zambia
Credit: www.ianplant.comIndulge yourself in this breathtaking
view of a sunset flowing into the
blissful blue of Victoria Falls in
Zambia. There is nothing better than
watching this with your significant
other; it will get you lost in the
world of wild romance and
adventure, leaving an unforgettable
memory to cherish forever.
Beautiful sunsets in Africa that willblow your mind Cape Town, South Africa (Credit
- SMCT)
Kenya (Credit - all4desktop
Bojo Beach, Ghana (Credit - BellAfricana Digest)
Madagascar (Credit - pixabay
Zambia (Credit - ianplant
Page9TheTrumpetAPRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016Opinion
The principle of autonomy and/or
self-determination is viewed as
foundational in any true democracy.
It is however worrying when democracy
becomes a millstone around the neck of
those who are supposed to benefit from it.
Such has been the case in Nigeria for close
to seventeen years of supposed democratic
rule. Democracy has been turned on its
head and self-determination or autonomy
do not exist, or at best, are infinitesimal.
Ajayi and Ojo (2014) wrote that “whileit remains true that Nigeria is governed bydemocratically elected leaders at thefederal and state levels, Nigeria is yet toinstitutionalise democracy after a centuryof existence as a political entity and that theimpediments to the institutionalisation ofdemocracy in Nigeria after more than halfa century of political independence includethe country’s colonial backgroundinterspersed by vagaries engendered bydeep-rooted ethnicity; complacent andspendthrift leadership; incessantintervention of the military in thedemocratic process; electoral fraud;widespread poverty and high illiteracylevel.” They argued that the pivot around
which most of the factors listed above
revolves is corruption which has virtually
become a way of life in Nigeria. However,
fortuitously, the prospect of a politically
stable and democratically viable nation is
marked by the Nigerian people’s eagerness
to participate in the electoral process; the
relative stability and sustenance of multi-
party system and the general realisation in
the country that the only acceptable and
popular route to the acquisition of political
power is through the ballot box.
Some free-market-oriented economists
have strongly criticized the efficiency of
democracy, based on the argument that
voters are illogical or otherwise highly
uneducated about many political issues,
especially those concerning economics and
relationships with other countries in the
world, while having a strong bias about the
few issues on which they are
knowledgeable.
This could result in a wealth disparity
in such a country, and in the case of
Nigeria, add ethnic and religious
discrimination, which unscrupulous and
corrupt politicians are very quick to exploit.
Fierlbeck (1998) points out that such a
result is not necessarily due to a failing in
the democratic process, but rather,
“because democracy is responsive to thedesires of a large middle class increasinglywilling to disregard the muted voices ofeconomically marginalized groups withinits own borders”. The criticism remains
that the will of the democratic majority may
not always be in the best interest of all
citizens within the country (Wikipedia)
Furthermore, some have argued that
voters may not be educated enough to
exercise their democratic right. A
population with low intellect or low
education (and let’s face it, Nigerians are
still largely uneducated) may not be capable
of making beneficial decisions. They argue
that the lack of rationality or even education
is being taken advantage of by normally
unscrupulous politicians, who compete
more in the way of public relations, money
and tactics, than in ideology. Lipset’s 1959
essay about the requirements for forming
democracy, found that “good educationwas present in almost all emergingdemocracies”. However, education alone
cannot sustain a democracy, though Caplan
did note in 2005 that “as a person’s
education increases, their thinking tends tobe more in line with most economists”.
For example, voters may not be
sufficiently educated to be able to foresee
the perpetuation of the community they
belong to, and therefore are unable to cast a
vote to that effect. But given the right to
vote, an uninformed man would certainly
cast a vote which will more likely be wrong
as affected by the personality charisma of
the candidate or some other superficial
reason, such as electoral bribery, flaunting
of wealth to induce or modify voting
patterns, that is, an ordinary voter may also
be lured into casting a vote on the basis of
financial help or some other petty promises,
e.g. Ekiti State’s Fayose’s notorious
“stomach infrastructure”.
In a democracy, the question is whether
to vote with one’s own interests in mind or
to ponder the greater good. As a simplistic
example, should a rich man vote for a
candidate or party that will benefit him
directly or one that he believes will provide
better public services for the poorer, even
if it means a loss in profits for him?
If one believes the greater good is more
important, those become one’s best
interests. One then is able to see how that
will benefit; there are apparent difficulties
here such as lack of sentience about issues,
half-baked knowledge about sensitive
topics that plague the country, etc.
On the other hand, if one believes one’s
needs are more important than what is
necessary for the country, then one
definitely should vote with that in mind. In
this case, one doesn’t necessarily need a
morally right or incorruptible leader; what
one needs is a leader who can make his
country and people happy and since you’re
one of them, your best interests are just as
important.
In the longer run, it’s important that
one’s best interests are brought into line
with the society’s. If not, the leader one
votes for will never win. To even consider
the greater good before casting one’s vote is
a success of democracy in my estimation
and will lead to the election of good leaders
over time.
So maybe it is better to vote in your
own best interests and hope others would
benefit too. Often voting for your interests
may be taking into account the greater
good, for example, as we often say in
Nigeria, securing and distributing equally,
the dividends of democracy. Wouldn’t a
freer, fairer, peaceful and secure society that
values, recognises, ensures and maintains
individual rights not benefit the greater
good, the greater society?
I like to think that many people in
Nigeria would vote for the best leader who
will govern based on what is needed for his
people to be happy at any time as opposed
to someone who is corrupt and harps on
nepotism, tribalism and religious bigotry.
Flexible, impartial, sincere, honest people
with conviction, vision and focus in their
opinions and ability to adapt make good
leaders in my view.
Doesn’t everyone vote their own
interests, consciously or subconsciously?
Even those that profess to vote in favour of
the greater good still have their own
interests at heart. No one is entirely
altruistic. And no politician is so particular
in nature that they can be entirely “greater
good” versus policies that could benefit
you. There will always be a mix. But this is
made worse in Nigeria because almost all
our politicians who go for political
positions go there for purely, 100% self-
seeking reasons, purpose and actions.
Therein lays the problem of the “own best
interest” or “common good” or “service to
the people”.
In a normal democratic environment,
people tend to vote for people they feel best
align with their values and views. There is
often some perceived benefit to voting for
Candidate A over B for that reason.
Unfortunately again, this theory does not
hold water in Nigeria, for two reasons. One,
the “perceived benefit” is usually the
immediate benefit to the voter, that is,
inducement by money or other material
inducement (stomach infrastructure in Ekiti
State again comes to mind). Second, due to
widespread electoral malpractices, even if
you cast your vote with your mind, your
vote might not really count, hence, work
done is zero, and your vote does not have
any influence on the outcome of the
election nor on the person who eventually
rules you. We are therefore totally left
frustrated and angry.
Generally, there has been a serious (and
almost irreversible) decline in social and
moral values in Nigeria. Our quest for
economic, social and political development
after Independence which was aided by the
oil discovery and wealth of the 70s led to a
situation where scant regard was paid to the
social engineering and betterment of the
citizenry, with the adverse consequences
we are now experiencing.
These leaders or politicians or elders are
Nigerians and so they do exhibit the
tendencies or the orientation of Nigerians.
We should recall and admit that many of
these politicians scarcely won any genuine
elections into the political positions they
now hold. They were involved in various
forms of electoral malpractices and fraud;
so where is their shame and moral standing
in the society, and whose interest are they
serving? It is impossible to expect men and
women of such kind to take the path of
honour when they come under the crucible
of even the least moral values. They have
never known the path of honour so can
never willingly take the path of honour.
What we should be asking of our
leaders, and ourselves, since Independence
56 years ago should be initially, “in whose
interest?” and then graduating to “in whose
best interest?” Unfortunately, we neither
asked both of them or ourselves, but are
suddenly realising that “it is to their (an
unscrupulous and opportunist ruling elite’s)
selfish interest”.
So, some of the questions that come to
mind are (and there are thousands more),
and we are not even asking for “best”
interest, just ordinary interest:
• In whose interest was the whole idea of
By Akintokunbo A [email protected]
In our or Nigeria’s interestor their best interest?
Fayose -Stomach infrastructure
Continued on Page 12 >
For those who care to know, I am a
passionate supporter of the
Muhammadu Buhari cause and that
position is not about to change! As a matter
of fact, my preference in the March 28,
2015 Presidential Election through which
Buhari eventually became Nigeria’s first
opposition candidate ever to defeat an
incumbent President, was a product of my
convictions and until I have sufficient
reasons to change course, my preference
remains on course. Be that as it may,
surprise will be the appropriate word
should I fail to make the list of the ‘Cult ofWailing Wailers’ as a result of this piece
which I believe is in the overall interest of
my country.
Whichever way the pendulum swings,
the good news is that, within a very short
time in office, Buhari has, to a great extent,
succeeded in rescuing Nigeria from the
jaws of a predatory elite and a band of
merit-devalued interlopers who have for
close to two decades deprived Nigeria of
her gold and silver. However, this is not to
say that I envy the president, not even with
the scourge of impunity that has turned
Nigeria into a morass of incensed screeches
where priorities are misplaced with
unimaginable perfidy and, responsibilities,
shifted with unrivaled pomposity.
Like the Biblical ten plagues, PeoplesDemocratic Party, PDP, passed through our
land and all we could feel were pinches of
hypocrisy and pains of stagnation. Its bunch
of yo-yos insulted our collective
intelligence with unimaginable artificiality
and its crop of educated-but-politically-
incompetent hands, “celestially” endowed
to take care of the downtrodden, only used
their “celestial weapons” to mortgage our
commonwealth. And, as if the gods were
angry, meanness replaced magnificence;
and, in place of conviction, we had
deception.
Buhari’s victory at the poll is no doubt
a great opportunity to reposition the ruling
All Progressives Party, APC, as a party of
principle. It is also an opportunity for the
progressive class to truly rediscover itself
before the next General Elections,
especially, if the ruling party must retain its
relevance in the consciousness of
Nigerians. As things stand, there are folks
out there in whose eyes, the only difference
between the badly-degraded PDP and the
victorious APC is Buhari. Well, maybe one
or two other genuine hearts here and there.
But they are as scarce as hen’s teeth! Added
to this is the opposition’s reported huge
investment in a mass of experts in the
spread of hate messages against the
President but, from the look of things, it is
as if the President’s strategists and
publicists have forgotten that lies, when
told too often, have the capacity to carouse
the exigencies of truth. In my candid
opinion, this is unhealthy for the party that
wants to move beyond where it currently
holds sway to the upper realm!
Needless to repeat that the President’s
efforts at recovering part of Nigeria’s stolen
loots is already yielding fruits. Nonetheless,
concerted efforts should be made towards
preventing the anti-corruption war from
being a temporary reprieve. This is why,
apart from building it around structures, not
men, Buhari must also endeavour to reform
a zigging-zagging judiciary that is at the
moment misconstruing the people’s tall
level of tolerance for short memory. He
must strive to put in place workable
structures that will prevent our monies from
being indescribably stolen and
indiscriminately stashed abroad. At least for
once in the affairs of this great country, our
destiny as a people created by God should
stop being in the hands of Pharisees who
value passion of power above logic of
reason and Princes of Sodom who cry even
when they don’t have tears.
Some governors’ sojourn in denial with
threatening jaunts of antiquated illogicality
notwithstanding, except Nigeria’s socio-
economic landscape which is currently
playing host to the fury of a global
meltdown receives anointing for
improvement, it stands to be seen how most
of the States can survive, post-Buhari’s first
term in office. For instance, no fewer than
four out of the six States in the Southwest
are as we speak, in arrears of several
months of workers’ salaries and
allowances. Other zones, including the
Federation, are not faring any better. No
thanks to an economic malaise that has
taken hold over the national economy.
Without mincing words, it is my hope
that Buhari would do well for progressive
politics by departing from the old, cruel
culture of taking the needs and expectations
of its followers as a four yearly-ritual in
which, immediately their votes are
captured, counted and credited, they
become aberrant artefacts whose ‘phones
will no longer ring’ until it is another
election year. Yes! In their attitude of
pettiness and little traditions, some among
them may wish to gloriously access the
Promised Land without painstakingly
encountering the Red Sea while, like the
children of Israel, others may prefer serving
the Egyptians to dying in the wilderness!
But, like it or not, since politics is a
numbers game, the President will be in a
better stead with the wisdom of Solomon,
not the tact of Jeroboam!
Again, that Buhari has done well for
himself and for the country is no longer
news! If he maximizes the momentum, the
President may become to Nigeria what
Abraham Lincoln is to the United States of
America. Like Buhari, Lincoln had
governed America at her most difficult
time. Apart from leading his country
through its bloodiest civil war, Abe Lincolnalso saw it through its greatest moral,
constitutional and political crisis. Not only
did he abolish slavery, he also strengthened
the government and completely rescued the
economy from the bottomless mess into
which it had previously been plunged.
Like the Lincoln-era America, Nigeria’s
current challenges are not only monstrous,
they’re also hydra-headed. The country is
currently contending with its bloodiest non-
conventional war ever even as Barabbas
and disaster capitalists who masquerade as
leaders have reduced dear fatherland to a
rustic cave of impiety, stymied
development and inverted values.
Coincidentally, the ‘bureaucracy’ which
quickened former President Goodluck
Jonathan‘s administration journey to the
Golgotha is still in Buhari’s government,
almost a year after, doing new things the
old way and it‘s as if the President is
comfortable with their services. On the
other hand, those ‘Change Agents’ who
committed so much in terms of human and
material resources into making the Buhari
dream a reality have for close to a year been
waiting in the wings to contribute their
quota to the development of the polity or,
as the case may be, replenish their barns.
Indeed, this is where the President has to
Page10 TheTrumpet APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016 Opinion
Travel
44 Watling Ave Burnt Oak HA8 0LT (2 mins from Burnt Oak Station)Tel: 020 8951 4447 / 020 3269 0003/ 07419 982146
Special Fares to:
* Accra * Lagos * Nairobi *
Dar-es-Salaam * Entebbe *
Jo'burg * Mogadishuand Worldwide Destinations
Jamil MangalTravel & Tours
TheTrump et
#TrumpetAt21- 21 years of
publishing andwaxing stronger
STALLIONS AIR
Ipanema Travel Ltd
NIGERIA from £489XCELLENTT WWORLDWIDEOOFFFFEERRSS AALLSSOO AAVVAAIILLAABBLLEE
Please Call 4 Cheap Xmas Fares
020 7580 599907979 861 455
Call AMIT / ALEX
73 WELLS ST, W1T 3QG
All Fares SeasonalATOL 9179
Continued on Page 12<
Muhammadu Buhari
A word for President Muhammadu BuhariBy Abiodun Komolafe
During the Jonathan administration,
an outspoken opposition
spokesperson had argued that
Nigeria was on auto-pilot, a phrase that was
gleefully even if ignorantly echoed by an
excitable opposition crowd. Deeper
reflection should have made it clear even to
the unthinking that there is no way any
country can ever be on auto-pilot, for there
are many levels of governance, all working
together and cross-influencing each other
to determine the structure of inputs and
outcomes in society. To say that a country is
on auto-pilot is to assume wrongly that the
only centre of governance that exists is the
official corridor, whereas governance is far
more complex. The question should be
asked, now as then: who is governing
Nigeria? Who is running the country? Why
do we blame government alone for our
woes, whereas we share a collective
responsibility, and some of the worst
violators of the public space are not even in
public office?
The President of the country is easily
the target of every criticism. This is perhaps
understandable to the extent that what we
have in Nigeria is the perfect equivalent of
an Imperial Presidency. Whoever is
President of Nigeria wields the powers of
life and death, depending on how he uses
those enormous powers attached to his
office by the Constitution, convention and
expectations. Nigeria’s President not only
governs, he rules. The kind of President that
emerges at any particular time can
determine the fortunes of the country. It
helps if the President is driven by a
commitment to make a difference, but the
challenge is that every President invariably
becomes a prisoner.
He has the loneliest job in the land,
because he is soon taken hostage by
officials and various interests, struggling to
exercise aspects of Presidential power
vicariously. And these officials do it right
to the minutest detail: they are the ones who
tell the President that he is best thing ever
since the invention of toothpaste. They are
the ones who will convince him as to every
little detail of governance: who to meet,
where to travel to, and who to suspect or
suspend. The President exercises power, the
officials and the partisans in the corridors
exercise influence. But when things go
wrong, it is the President that gets the
blame. He is reminded that the buck stops
at his desk.
We should begin to worry about these
dangerous officials in the system,
particularly within the public service, the
reckless mind readers who exploit the
system for their own ends, and who walk
free when the President gets all the blame.
To govern properly, every government not
only needs a good man at the top, but good
officials who will serve the country. We are
not there yet. The same civil servants who
superintended over the omissions of the
past 16 years are the ones still going up and
down today, and it is why something has
changed but nothing has changed. The
reality is terrifying.
The officials at the State levels are no
different, from the Governor down to the
local government chairman and their staff.
They hardly get as much criticism as the
folks in Abuja, but they are busy every day
governing Nigeria, and doing so very badly
too. Local Government Chairmen and their
officials do almost nothing. The Governors
also try to act as if they are Imperial
Majesties. The emphasis on ceremony
rather than actual performance is the bane
of governance in Nigeria. Everyone seems
to be obsessed with ceremony and
privileges.
A friend sent me a picture he took with
the Mayor of London inside a train, in the
midst of ordinary citizens and asked if that
would ever happen in Nigeria. The Mayor
had no bodyguards. He was on his own. In
the Netherlands, the Prime Minister is a
part-time lecturer in one of the local
colleges. Nigerian pubic officials are often
too busy to have time for normal life. Even
if they want to live normally, the system
also makes it impossible. We need people
in government living normal lives. Leaders
need not be afraid of the people they
govern. They must identify with them.
There is too much royalty in government
circles in Nigeria. No matter how well-
intentioned you may be, once you find
yourself in their midst, you will soon start
acting and sounding like one, because it is
the only language that is spoken in those
corridors.
Elsewhere, ideas govern countries.
People become leaders on the basis of ideas
and they govern with ideas. That is why the
average voter in Europe or North America
knows that what he votes for, is what he is
likely to get. Clearly in the on-going
Presidential nomination process in the
United States, every voter knows the
difference between Bernie Sanders and
Hillary Clinton on the Democratic side and
between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump on
the Republican side. Such differences are
often blurry in Nigeria: our politics is
driven by partisan interests; a primordial
desperation for power, not ideas. It is also
why Nigerian politicians can belong to five
different political parties and movements
within a decade.
Even when men of ideas show up in the
political arena, they are quickly reminded
that they are not politicians and do not
understand politics. Gross anti-
intellectualism is a major problem that
Nigeria would have to address at some
stage. Some of the administrations in the
past who had brainy men and women of
ideas in strategic positions ended up not
using them. They were either frustrated,
caged, co-opted or forced to adapt or shown
the door. The question is often asked: why
don’t such people walk away? The answer
that is well known in official corridors is
this: doing so may be a form of suicide.
Once inside, you are not allowed to walk
out on the Federal Government of Nigeria,
and if you must, not on your own terms. So,
governance fails even at that level of
values: that other important element that
governs progressive nations.
Partisan interests are major factors in
the governance process. These seem to be
the dominant factor in Nigeria, but again,
they are irresponsibly deployed. The crowd
of political parties, religious groups,
traditional rulers, ethnic and community
associations, professional associations,
pastors, priests, traditional rulers, imams
and alfas, shamanists, native doctors,
soothsayers and traditional healers: they all
govern. They wield enormous influence.
But they have never helped Nigeria and
they are not helping. All the people in
public offices have strong links to all these
other governors of Nigeria, but what kind
Page11TheTrumpetAPRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
Opinion
For your Music band withclassic rendition for all
occasions, with traditional,contemporary African
international and Gospel filledwith professional decent
Presentation.
More Musicians, Singers,Instrumentalists, handy men,
Music directors band co-ordinators, Audio and/or video
technicians, Drivers,Marketing Personnel are
welcome.
Contact: Olugbenga on
07438 264613
Bubble In Christ Music Band " Events are incomplete withoutbelly laffs. Book Afrohollywood's
best Comedian "Mc Mark" as mainhost for your wedding, Birthday,Corporate function or as an after
dinner stand-up comedian. Mc Mark "CUN" Comedian United Nations 07903039076/ [email protected]
tested positive to laffter...www.mcmarkcomedian.org
Continued on Page 13<
Who governs Nigeria?
BY REUBEN ABATI
Page12 TheTrumpet APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016 Opinion
democracy in Nigeria?
• In whose interest was the sixteen years
of democracy under the People’s
Democratic Party (PDP), and in whose
interest would the Alliance for
Progressive Change (APC) rule for the
next 3 years remaining?
• In whose interest were our oil and other
resources being managed since
Independence 56 years ago?
• In whose interest do we even have
governments – federal, state and local?
• In whose interest do our politicians seek
election into all electable offices?
• In whose interest are our civil servants,
ministers and other political appointees
working?
• In whose interest are politicians called
upon to resign for one reason or the
other
• In whose interest are the employees,
contractors, owners and stakeholders in
Nigeria’s oil industry working?
• Whose interest have Nigeria’s military
been serving since they ventured into
governance?
• Whose interest is being served when
unions call strikes?
• And a thousand other questions.
What we have in Nigeria is a deadly
cocktail of conflict of interest, self-
interests, selfish and personal interests,
regional interests, religious interests and
unbridled, chocking corruption-driven
interests. What for? Aren’t we all going to
die? And when we die, what do we take
with us to wherever dead people go?
Femi Fabiyi, in his article, “Nigeria and
the Emerging Economies” wrote “Many ofNigeria’s mafias have invested their stolenmonies in personal homes abroad (USA,Britain, Dubai, South Africa and a host ofother countries). Why should a Nigerian-based politician maintain a residentialhome in the USA? I honestly cannot find areasonable answer to this question. For myreaders who do not understand the USAreal estate market, here is a hypotheticalcase – A Nigerian based politician whoowns a $1,000,000 house in America isexpected to pay at least 2% of $1,000,000in property taxes and between 1.5% and
2% of $1,000,000 for maintenance on ayearly bases. So, what sense does it makefor a Nigerian politician to pull an averageof $35,000 from the local economy everyyear and send it to America to help developAmerican cities and counties?”
Will it be easy? Of course not! Aside
from dealing with the problems inherited
after decades of debauchery, profligacy,
mismanagement, indolence, corruption,
neglect of the people and infrastructure, etc;
there is also the added issue of newly
created difficulties occasioned by
prevailing circumstances alongside the
added complications of purveyors of
hopelessness and dejection fouling the air
with their negative natter, sabotage and
wanton corruption, who want to retain and
maintain the status quo.
But just like President Obama of the
United States of America said - simply and
succinctly - “Nothing in life that’s worth
anything is easy.“
In whose best interest is Nigeria itself?
References:
* Ajayi,A T and Ojo E O, 2014.
“Democracy in Nigeria: Practice, Problems
and Prospects” International Knowledge
Sharing Platform, Vol 4, No 2 (2014)
* Bendix, Reinhard; Lipset, Seymour
M. (June 1957). “Political Sociology”.
Current Sociology 6 (2): 79–99.
doi:10.1177/001139215700600201.
Retrieved April 05, 2014.)
* Caplan, Bryan. “From Friedman to
Wittman: The Transformation of Chicago
Political Economy”, Econ Journal Watch,
April 2005.
* Fabiyi, Femi 2016. “Nigeria and the
Emerging Economies”
http://www.championsfornigeria.com/inde
x.php/14-articles/107-nigeria-and-the-
emerging-economies Retrieved 10 April,
2016.
* Fierlbeck, K. (1998) Globalizing
Democracy: Power, Legitimacy and the
Interpretation of democratic ideas. (p.13)
Manchester University Press, New York.
In our or Nigeria’s interest or their best interest?Continued from Page 9<
proactively rise to the occasion in order to
avoid any possible backlash which may be
unpleasant to the ruling party and
counterproductive to the country.
Ernest Benn describes politics as “theart of looking for trouble, finding it whetherit exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly,and applying the wrong remedy.” But what
is so special in progressive politics that
politicians always find a place of refuge in
it? Even in its “comfortable and ill-defined”
state, how does a progressive party manage
its successes as well as prevent abuse of
power in politics and government? And,
with our kind of politics and the attitude of
politicians in this clime, is any politician
worth dying for? As a matter of fact, is
politics worth dying for, let alone
politicians?
Like Teddy Roosevelt, Buhari will be
writing his name in gold if he is able to
champion noble aims that are in agreement
with Nigeria’s socio-economic and geo-
political realities. And who knows? With
zealous vigilance, our President may end up
as another “ultimate pragmatist“ and an
“epitome of a president who enduredpersonal loss, political attacks, and theprospect of presiding over the dissolution
of the country, yet persevered andtriumphed.”
May the Lamb of God, who takes
away the sins of the world, grant us peace
in Nigeria!
*Abiodun Komolafe([email protected]) wrote in fromIjebu-Jesa, Osun State, Nigeria.
Continued from Page 10<
A word for President Muhammadu Buhari
Iread an interesting article recently in
which the author, objecting to President
Muhammadu Buhari’s frequent travels
abroad pointed out that Presidential
spokespersons since 1999, including this
writer, have always justified such trips using
essentially the same arguments. The fellow
quoted copiously and derisively from my
State House press statements and an article
by me titled: “The Gains of Jonathan’s
Diplomacy”.
Those who object to Presidential travels
abroad do so for a number of reasons: (a) the
cost on the grounds of frequency and size of
estacode-collecting delegation, with multiple
officers performing the same function
tagging along on every trip, (b) the need to
make better use of diplomats in foreign
missions and Foreign Ministry officials who
can act in delegated capacity; (c) the failure
to see the immediate and long-term gains of
Presidential junket, thus creating the
impression of a jamboree or mindless
tourism, and (d) the conviction that the
President needs to stay at home to address
urgent domestic challenges, rather than live
out of a suitcase, in the air. While these
reasons may seem understandable, arising as
they are from anxieties about reducing
wastage and increasing governmental
efficiency for the people’s benefit, I still insist
that Presidential trips are important, and that
by travelling abroad, the President is
performing a perfectly normal function.
We may however, complain about abuses
and the reduction of an important function to
tourism for after all, in eight years, President
Bill Clinton of the United States travelled
only 54 times – only by Nigerian standards,
but we must also admit that the President is
the country’s chief diplomat. In our
constitutional democracy, he is the main
articulator and implementer of the country’s
foreign policy. He appoints ambassadors who
function in their various posts as his
representatives. He also receives other
country’s ambassadors. Emissaries from
other countries or multilateral organizations
consider their visits incomplete without an
audience with the President, and it is his
message that they take back home.
He visits other Presidents and he also gets
visited by other world leaders; an interaction
that provides him an opportunity to give
effect to Section 19 of the 1999 Constitution
which defines the objectives of Nigeria’s
Foreign Policy. In doing this, he is expected
to strengthen relationships with other
countries, at government to government and
people to people levels in the national
interest.
The President is also the country’s chief
spokesperson, and that is why what he says,
or what he does when he is negotiating within
the international arena on Nigeria’s behalf is
of great consequence, and this is particularly
why on at least two occasions recently,
Nigerians were inconsolably upset when
their President chose a foreign stage to put
down his own country, and people. This
clarification of the role of the President as the
country’s chief diplomat may sound didactic,
and I apologise if it comes across as pedantic,
but this is necessary for the benefit of those
who may be tempted to assume that the job
of a President is to sit in one place at home
and act as a mechanic and ambulance chaser.
The concerns that have been expressed
however point to something far more
complex, and I seek to now problematize
aspects of it.
One of the concerns often expressed is
that the trips that have been made by our
Presidents since 1999 look too much alike. It
is as if every President that shows up,
embarks on exactly the same junket to the
same locations, for the same reasons: foreign
direct investment, agriculture, security, co-
operation etc. etc. accompanied by a large
retinue that includes many of the same
officials who travelled with the former
President and had prepared the same MOUs
that will be signed again, with the new
spokespersons telling us the same story all
The President as Chief DiplomatBy Reuben Abati
Chinese President Xi Jinping with NigerianPresident Muhammadu Buhari in Beijing
Continued on Page 13<
Page13TheTrumpetAPRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016Opinion
of morality do they discuss? Those with
partisan interests, including even promoters
of Non-Governmental groups (NGOs) all
have one interest at heart: power and
relevance.
The same priests who saw grand visions
for the PDP and its members over a 16-year
period are still in business seeing visions
and making predictions. Those who claim
to be so powerful they can make the lame
walk and the blind see, have not deemed it
necessary to step forward to help the NNPC
turn water into petrol. If any of these
miracle-delivering pastors can just turn the
Lagos Lagoon alone into a river of petrol,
all Nigerians will become believers, but
that won’t happen because they are
committed to a different version of the
gospel. As for the political parties: they are
all in disarray.
The private sector also governs Nigeria.
But what is the quality of governance in the
corporate sector? The Nigerian corporate
elite is arrogant. They claim that they create
jobs so the country may prosper, but they
are, in reality, a rent-seeking class. They
survive on government patronage, access to
the Villa and its satellites, and claims of
indispensability. But without government,
most private sector organizations will be in
distress. The withdrawal of public funds
into a Treasury Single Account is a case in
point. And with President Muhammadu
Buhari not readily available to the eye-
service wing of the Nigerian private sector,
former sycophants in the corridors are
clandestinely resorting to sabotage and
blackmail. A responsible private sector has
a duty in society: to build society, not to
donate money to politicians during
elections and seek patronage thereafter.
And if it must co-operate with government,
it must be for much nobler reasons in the
public interest.
The military are still governing Nigeria
too. They may be in the background, but
their exit 16 years ago, has not quite
translated into a loss of influence or
presence. In the early years of their de-
centering, many of them chose to join
politics and replace their uniforms with
traditional attires. Their original argument
is that if other professionals can join
politics, then a soldier should not be
excluded. They failed to add that the
military class in politics in Africa has
shown a tendency to exercise proprietorial
rights and powers, which delimit the
democratic project. In Nigeria, such powers
and rights have been exercised consistently
and mostly by, happily for us, a
gerontocratic class, whose impact, I
believe, will be determined by the effluxion
of time.
And it is like this: the President that
emerged in 1999 was a soldier: the received
opinion was that only such a strong man
could stabilize the country. His successor
was the brother of another old soldier; he
and his Deputy were personally chosen by
the departing President. He died in office,
but for his Deputy to succeed him, it helped
a lot that he was also a favourite of the
General who chose his own successors.
When this protégé fell out with the General,
in retrospect now, a miscalculation, the
General turned Godfather swore to remove
him from office. And it happened. In 2015,
another former soldier and strong man, had
to be brought back to office and power.
When anything goes wrong, a class of old
Generals are the ones who step forward to
protect and guide the country. The only
saving grace is that they do not yet have a
successor–class of similarly influential men
with military pedigree. But when their time
passes, would there be equally strong
civilians who can act as protectors of the
nation?
The media governs too. But the media
in Nigeria today is heavily politicized,
compromised and a victim of internal
censorship occasioned by hubris. Can the
media still save Nigeria? It is in the same
pit as the Nigerian voter, foreign interests,
the legislature and the judiciary. But when
there is positive change at all of these
centres of power and influence, only then
will there be change, movement and
motion, and a new Nigeria.
Continued from Page 11<
Who governs Nigeria?
over again.
Nigerians are therefore not impressed
with the seeming conversion of the country’s
foreign policy process into a money-guzzling
ritual. This, I think, is the crux of the matter.
Whereas our foreign policy objective talks
about national interest, what constitutes that
national interest has been blurry and
chameleonic in the last 55 years and more so
since the return to civilian rule in 1999.
National interest has been replaced majorly
by personal interest and it is the worst tragedy
that can befall a country’s foreign policy
process. We run a begin-again foreign
relations framework because every new
President wants to make his own mark. The
second point is that he is compelled to do so
because in any case, we do not have a strong
institution to follow up on existing
agreements. The international community
knows this quite well, and more serious
nations being more strategic and determined
in the pursuit of their own interests will
bombard a new Nigerian President with
invitations to visit. They also know that a
new President in Nigeria is likely to cancel
or suspend existing agreements or contracts
being executed by their nationals. The
uncertainty that prevails in Nigeria is so well
known, such that the gains recorded by one
administration are not necessarily
institutionalized.
We may have thus reduced foreign policy
to individual heroism, which is sad, but
institutions and human capital within this
arena are critical. The Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, once a glorious institution is a
shadow of its old self. The politicization of
that Ministry has done great damage. When
a President visits a country, and enters into
agreements that result in Memoranda of
Understanding, it is expected that there will
be follow up action to be taken by officials
either through Bilateral Commissions (where
they exist between Nigeria and the respective
country) or the issuance of instruments of
ratification, leading to due implementation.
Nigeria signs all kinds of documents but so
many details and agreements are left
unattended to. There is too much politics in
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and too much
rivalry between career foreign affairs
personnel and the politicians who do not
allow them to function as professionals. This
has to stop, otherwise every new President
has to start again and embark on trips that
should have been taken care of at the level of
bilateral commissions or the ministry.
Career foreign affairs personnel are
critical to the shaping of foreign policy. They
are the agents through which states
communicate with each other, negotiate, and
sustain relationships. The only thing they
complain about in that Ministry is lack of
money. It is the same with the Missions
abroad. Give them money, but there is always
a greater need for professionalism, which
makes the diplomats of Nigeria’s golden era
so sad. The foreign policy process also works
better when there is Inter-Ministerial and
Intra-governmental collaboration. The
tendency in Nigeria is for every department
of government to operate as an independent
foreign policy unit. Government officials get
invited to functions by foreign embassies,
without clearance from the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, and they just troop there to
eat free food, but they never keep their
mouths shut. Nigerian officials are probably
the most talkative in the world and with
foreigners, they will offer their mother’s life
history to make them appear important. That
is not how to run foreign relations. There
must be control, co-ordination, discipline,
clarity and sanctions.
Every world leader wants to meet the
Nigerian President. Nigeria is a strategic
market and a very cheap one too, a source of
raw materials and a dumping ground for
finished products, with a consumptive
population. Our balance sheet in all our
relationships is unbalanced even in Africa,
which we once described as the centerpiece
of our foreign policy. We have toyed with
many slogans: dynamic diplomacy,
economic diplomacy, concentric circles of
medium powers, citizen diplomacy,
transformational diplomacy, what else/- the
Buharideens are yet to come up with their
own, but you wait, they will soon come up
with something- really, the truth is that
Nigeria’s foreign policy process is not
strategic or competitive enough.
Within Africa, it is driven by too much
kindness rather than enlightened self-interest,
or deliberate search for sustainable
advantages. A Donatus mentality has seen
Nigeria over the years looking out for its
African neighbours, donating money,
supporting their causes, but Nigeria has
gained little from this charity-driven
diplomacy. Many of the countries we have
helped to build openly despise us at
international meetings, they struggle for
positions with Nigeria, they humiliate our
citizens in Diaspora, and when they return
later to beg for vehicles, or money to pay
their civil servants or run elections, we still
oblige them. The attempt in recent years to
review all of this, and be more strategic
should be sustained.
We must wield the carrot and the stick
more often. American Presidents don’t just
visit other countries, they make statements
and often alter the course of history with their
mere presence as Kennedy did with his visit
to Berlin in 1963, Nixon in China in 1972,
Jimmy Carter going to Iran in 1977, George
Bush visiting Mexico in 2001, and Obama in
Cuba in 2016. In the international arena, we
give the impression that we are ready to jump
at any and every invitation in order to be seen
to be friendly, but we tend to overdo this.
Foreign Affairs Ministry officials who want
to be seen to be doing something will always
try to convince the President to embark on all
trips. The dream of every Ambassador on
foreign posting is also to have his President
visit, even if once during his or her tenure.
The resident Ambassador is happy, the
Foreign Affairs folks get quality eye-time
with the President but the hosts look at us and
wonder what is wrong with our country
signing the same agreements with the
emergence of every President and not being
able to act.
It does not help either that with every new
President, we talk about reviewing Nigeria’s
Foreign Policy. We are probably the only
country in the world that is always reviewing
Foreign Policy and informing the whole
world. That should be the routine work of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Nigeria
Institute of International Affairs, with inputs
from the Nigerian Institute of Policy and
Strategic Studies (NIPSS), the Nigeria
Intelligence Agency (NIA), and the
Presidential Advisory Committee on Foreign
Affairs.
We must never lose sight of a necessary
linkage between domestic policy and foreign
policy. What exactly is in it for the average
Nigerian, for the Nigerian economy and for
Nigeria? Do we have the capacity to
maximize gains from foreign interactions?
Always, the real challenge lies in getting our
acts together and tying up the loose ends in
terms of sustainable policy choices,
infrastructure, culture, leadership, and
strategic engagement.
Continued from Page 12<The President as Chief Diplomat
Page14 TheTrumpet APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
He means different things to different
people. To some, he is a workaholic. To
others, he is the governor of the masses,
a deeply passionate leader through whose
arteries, the overall best interest of the people,
flows just like blood. Yet to some others, he is a
purpose-driven, prudent manager of human and
material resources committed to permanently
changing the look and feel of Ogun State
through his Mission to Rebuild.
But from whichever perspective he is
viewed, one thing is however constant and that
is the fact that Senator Ibikunle Amosun as
Governor of Ogun State is one man who
constantly shies away from accolades, awards
and recognitions in spite of the fact that his
achievements in office in the last five years,
easily recommend him for many of such.
“For me, awards and recognitions are best
when they come after we must have left office
and people access our efforts and achievements
in office,” Amosun would say each time the
subject matter is broached.
However, in spite of his near aversion for
awards and recognitions, Governor Amosun,
like a golden fish that his sterling performance
in office has made him, has no hiding place. He
is constantly, literally chased around with
awards, accolades and recognitions for the
unparallel record of achievement that he has
garnered since he assumed office as the duly
elected governor of Ogun State on May 29,
2011.
In a society where many are known to pay
for and literally solicit awards, Governor
Amosun has turned down several. It therefore
came as a pleasant surprise when some of us,
his aides were able to convince him to be
physically present to receive the 2015 Vanguard
Personality of the Year Award which he won in
the Governor of the Year category and was
presented to him on Friday, April 8, 2016 at the
Eko Hotels and Towers, Lagos.
On a lighter note, I personally consider
Governor Amosun’s decision to receive the
Governor of the Year Award as a birthday gift
since it was presented to him at a colourful event
which the organisers had coincidentally
scheduled on my birthday.
Beyond that however, it was also a well-
deserved honour for a man who has done more
than anyone before him to permanently change
the fortunes of Ogun State and its people for
good. In achieving this feat, Senator Amosun
was deliberate and calculated. Indeed, Ogun
State is lucky to have had in him a leader whose
emergence was not in any way accidental. He
first served as a Senator having been elected into
the Nigerian Senate in 2003. By 2007, he tried
to be governor but was adjudged to have lost the
election by the powers that be then, although the
people felt otherwise.
By 2011, the popular will of Ogun people was
finally affirmed and Senator Amosun was sworn
into office as Governor of Ogun State. The first
indication that he was prepared for the job
showed in the five cardinal programmes he
immediately rolled out as the focus of his
administration. The programme was led by
education. One was therefore not surprised
when his administration quickly proceeded to
make education free and ensure that no child is
left behind on account of his/her economic
background.
Tuition fees and all forms of levies in the
State were abolished for all students in primary
and secondary schools. In addition, the
distribution of free textbooks to pupils of public
primary and secondary schools by the Amosun
administration also helped to ensure that
education remains accessible for all. Not only
did the Governor Amosun-led administration
offset the outstanding WAEC fees it inherited
from the previous administration, it also went
further to consistently pay the (WAEC) fees for
final-year students of public secondary schools
in the State since its inauguration in May 2011.
At the tertiary level, the Amosun
administration significantly reduced tuition fees
payable in all the State’s higher institutions of
learning and paid bursary to 16,277 indigenous
Ogun State students in all tertiary institutions in
the country between 2011 and 2015.
Governor Amosun administration also provided
critical infrastructure in the education sector. As
at the last count, it has so far constructed 15
state-of-the-art model schools out of a planned
total of 28 spread across the State. And these are
not your regular schools. They are called Model
Schools because they are designed to
accommodate 1,000 students and over 200
teaching and non-teaching staff. They all come
with boarding facilities as well as computers for
virtual learning, modern science laboratories
and other facilities.
All of these have been made possible partly
because the Governor Amosun-led
administration has consistently allocated over
20% of its yearly budget to education in
accordance with UNESCO guidelines. It
therefore did not come as a surprise that the
administration won the 2015 Fafunwa
Educational Foundation award, as the State with
the highest percentage of budgetary allocation
to education.
Knowing the place and importance of
having a healthy population, Governor Amosun
placed affordable and efficient healthcare
delivery second on the five-cardinal
development programme. In this respect, the
Amosun-led administration for instance,
upgraded the Totoro Primary Health Centre
(PHC) into a Comprehensive Health Centre.
Such midas touch is not limited to Totoro PHC
- it is to be replicated in the other Local
Government Areas of the State.
Prior to the Amosun touch, the Totoro PHC
was a three-room centre with an attached
outpost structure used as antenatal care and
reception area. This facility was demolished and
replaced with the construction of a state-of-the-
art one-storey building with a partial
underground section. Equally currently enjoying
the Governor Amosun touch is the Olabisi
Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital
(OOUTH) which can now boast of a state-of-
the-art Radio-Diagnostic Centre established
through a Public Private Partnership (PPP)
initiative. This Centre provides services such as
multi-dimensional digital X-ray, ultrasound
facility, telemedicine, mammography,
fluoroscopy and CT scan.
Little wonder that during the Ebola Virus
Disease outbreak of 2014, Ogun State came out
unscathed in spite of the risk presented by the
numerous, yet porous borders that Ogun State
shares with the West African sub-region and the
fact that it is the gateway to all other parts of the
country.
Today, the need to not only return to the
cultivation of the land but also engage in
agriculture value chain addition is one that is
crystal clear to government at all levels in
Nigeria. This is however one other area where
the visionary in Governor Amosun easily shines
through. As soon as he assumed office in 2011,
Governor Amosun made this a critical
component of his five cardinal programme in
Ogun State.
The governor was driven by the proximity
of Ogun State to a vibrant consumer market in
Lagos and the West African sub-region and the
abundance of land and labour within its territory.
Therefore, since May 2011, 15,221 hectares of
agricultural land has been allocated for the
development of various crops and the raising of
livestock, notably poultry.
Priority crops include Cassava, Rice, Oil
Palm, Cocoa and a range of vegetables.
The Governor Amosun-led administration
entered into an agreement with the Malaysian
Ministry of Agriculture to develop a 500-hectare
rice plantation, positioning Ogun State to help
drive an important dimension of the national
economic diversification efforts. It also
developed farm estates for both crops and
livestock, engaging young farmers within the
State in Agriculture. The Owowo Model Farm
Estate is a laudable example of this effort.
Today, thanks to the visionary leadership of
Senator Amosun, Ogun State is the most
industrialised sub-national in Nigeria. Statistics
from the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria
(MAN) indicate that Ogun State Industrial Zone
ranked 1st in 2014, while new investment into
Ogun in 2014 was valued at N514.87 billion, an
increase from the 2013 investment of N376.57
billion and total Investment stood at N691.77
billion (74%) by the end of 2014.
A total number of 88 new factories have
been commissioned between 2011 to date, thus
bringing the total number of factories in the
State to 371. More than 100 companies made
requests for land, while many others are at
various stages of construction. In fact, in its
latest economic review (2015), MAN said the
production value recorded by the Ogun
Industrial Zone accounted for 69 percent of the
total production for all zones, thus re-confirming
Ogun as the industrial hub of Nigeria.
Page15TheTrumpetAPRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016Trumpet Ogun
A Governor and his moment of glory By Adejuwon Soyinka
Celebrating the achievements of Amosun and his team
Ogun State cabinet members celebrating with Amosun
Continued on Page 16>
Page16 TheTrumpet APRIL 27 - MAY 10 2016
TheTrumpet is published in London fortnightly by Trumpet
Tel: 020 8522 6600 Field: 07956 385 604 E-mail: [email protected] (ISSN: 1477-3392)
Trumpet Ogun
As the industries and foreign investors keep
pouring in, the Governor Amosun-led
administration was also clear ahead of time
about the need to provide quality housing for
them. This is why provision of affordable
housing is one of the five cardinal programmes
of the administration. In this respect, a number
of housing development projects have been
completed, catering for a range of income
levels. These include HID Awolowo Housing
Estate, Plainfields Estate and A.A.K Degun
Estate. There is also the President Muhammadu
Buhari Estate situated on a 170 hectares expanse
of land along the Abeokuta-Sagamu
Expressway. This estate is designed as a Site and
Services scheme and is strategically located at
less than two minutes’ drive from the main
Abeokuta township.
Equally critical to the Governor Amosun
administration’s Mission to Rebuild Ogun State
is the construction of major roads and bridges
in the State whose capital, Abeokuta, used to be
described as ancient. Today, Abeokuta has shed
the toga of an ancient city and now wears the
robe of modernity. For this to happen, Amosun
government constructed the Ibara-Totoro Road,
the first international standard six-lane road in
the State.
It built the flyover at Ibara, also the first
constructed by any administration since the
creation of the State in 1976. The first 10-lane
boulevard, which begins at Sokori and opens up
into the elaborate Itoku Bridge, is a stamp of
modernisation affixed to the State capital by the
current administration.
These developments are not limited to
Abeokuta. In Ijebu Ode for instance, the
Amosun-led administration constructed the
Mobalufon overhead bridge. Other overhead
bridges in Sabo, Sagamu, Lagos Garage in Ijebu
Ode, Sapon and Iyana Mortuary in Abeokuta
have been completed and commissioned while
work is ongoing on those at Ijebu Igbo, Ilaro as
well as five different bridges along the Sango-
Ojodu road.
Within the Ogun West Senatorial District,
the GovernorAmosun-led administration is also
constructing the longest road, cutting across four
local councils in the area. The 107km Ilara-Ijoun
Road is designed to put an end to the stress
commuters often go through criss-crossing that
area and linking up with the borders Nigeria
shares with neighbouring Benin Republic.
Within Ado-Odo Ota Local Council area, the
Governor Amosun-led administration is also
responsible for massive reconstruction of the
all-important Ilo-Awela Road and also
modernised Ota environs through the
construction of modern township roads.
Indeed, the present day Ogun State, under the
current government, is one huge construction
site.And GovernorAmosun is not done yet. “By
the time we are through, we would have about
24 to 25 flyovers in Ogun State. Indeed, by
December, we would have had 15 up and
running in Ogun State,” GovernorAmosun said
recently.
Again, he is not stopping there. In fact, a
little bird tells me that the Action Governor of
Ogun State is also planning to expand the IBB
Boulevard which directly leads into the State
capital from Sagamu Interchange into a 10-lane
super highway. Not only that, he also intends to
bring his dream of having a fast rail transport
system linking Ogun with Lagos into reality
before the end of his tenure of office.
Now tell me, with all of these achievements,
why wouldn’t Governor Amosun be literally
chased around with awards, accolades and
commendations?* Adejuwon Soyinka, Senior Special
Assistant (Media) and spokesman for GovernorIbikunle Amosun, is a multiple award-winningjournalist and former Editor with TELLMagazine.
A Governor and his moment of gloryContinued from Page 15<
Vanguard Governor of the Year - Ibikunle Amosun flanked by Dr Alex Ekwueme and Oba Otudeko
Ahearty congratulations to a
loving father, grandfather and
husband - Otunba Bushra
Alebiosu at 80.
Otunba Bush started his early
career as an Engineer after his return
from the UK in 1967, and in 1976, he
went into politics and became a
Councillor in the then Shomolu Local
Government of Lagos State. He
became a Legislator in the Lagos State
House of Assembly in 1979 and was
re-elected in 1983, a post he held till
the Buhari-Idiagbon coup in 1983.
Otunba Bush seized this
opportunity to focus on building his
political leadership career - many
politicians received great counsel and
enormous support in developing their
political careers through his mentoring
and leadership.
Otunba Bush is a fervent believer
and astounding devout Muslim - he
built a mosque in the grounds of his
home to appreciate the goodness and
mercy of Allah.
Otunba Bush is greatly respected by
his contemporaries and friends which
included the Late Fela Anikulapo-Kuti.
He is a God fearing man, a living
legend, a force to be reckoned with, a
supporter of family and friends and a
firm believer in fairness and justice.
Family values matter to this great man
and today, he is celebrated by his
beautiful, youthful wife, Otunba Mrs
Hilda Funmilayo Bush Alebiosu who is
and remains his heartthrob for life,
together with his children,
grandchildren and well wishers both in
Nigeria and abroad.
Sir, may your days be long and
purposeful and as you celebrate your
80th year on earth, may you live the
rest of your years in good health, joy
and happiness In Shaa Allah.
Otunba BushraAlebiosu at 80By Yemisi Akindele
Otunba Bushra Alebiosu
Top Related