The Role of Workplace Values, Climate, and Technology Perceptions on Technology Use
Patricia HolahanKai Wang
Unpleasant Truth
• Technological change initiatives continue to experience a failure rate approaching 70%...
(Standish 2009, IBM 2008, Raps 2004, Beer 2003, HBR 2000, Senge
1999, Strebel 1996, Kotter 1995)
• Research has shown that the top 10 reasons why technology projects fail have nothing to do with the technology itself; it has to do with the people and implementation processes.
• “Good idea…failed implementation”
Voluntary Technology Adoption – What we know
• Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
(Davis 1989)
Perceived Usefulness(PU)
Perceived Ease of Use(PEOU)
Attitude Toward Technology Usage
Intention to Use
Actual Technology Use(Behavior)
Construct Definitions
Perceived usefulness – extent to which the technology is perceived to be better than prior practice (e.g. 4S iPhone).
Perceived ease of use – extent to which the technology is perceived as easy to master and use.
Technology Implementati on in Organizati ons
• Two stages• 1st Stage - Adoption by organization• 2nd Stage – Adoption/Actual usage by
targeted users
• Contingent authority adoption decision (CAAD)
• TAM is not sufficient• Developed for voluntary adoption• No practical advice for managers
Example photo layout
Compatibility w/ Workplace Value 1
Compatibility w/Workplace Value 2
Individual Attributes
Implementation climate
Organizational Attributes
PerceivedUsefulness
PerceivedEase of Use
Consistency of use
Quality of use
Technology Use
Task-Technology AttributesCompatibility w/
Existing Work Processes
H1
H2
H4
H3
Research Model
Construct Definitions
Compatibility w/ Workplace Values – extent to which technology use will foster the fulfillment of important workplace values.
Implementation Climate – extent to which technology use is expected, supported, rewarded.
Construct Definitions
Compatibility w/ Existing Work Processes – extent to which the technology is perceived as consistent with current workflow processes or practices.
Or, extent to which current workflow processes will remain unchanged.
Example photo layout
Compatibility w/ Workplace Value
Individual Attributes
Implementation climate
Organizational Attributes
PerceivedUsefulness
PerceivedEase of Use
Consistency of use
Quality of use
Technology Use
Task-Technology AttributesCompatibility w/
Existing Work Processes
H1
H2a
H4
H3a
Research Hypotheses 1-4
H2b, H3b
Research Hypotheses 5-6
H5. High ConsistencyLow Quality of Use
H6. High ConsistencyHigh Quality of Use
Cli
mat
e
Weak
Strong
Value Compatibility HighLow
Hypotheses
• H1: Perceived usefulness will fully mediate the effect of values compatibility on implementation effectiveness.
• H2a,b: Perceived usefulness will partially mediate the effect of climate for implementation on implementation effectiveness.
• H3a,b: Perceived ease of use will partially mediate the effect of climate for implementation on implementation effectiveness.
Hypotheses
• H4: Perceived ease of use will partially mediate the effect of compatibility with work processes on implementation effectiveness.
• H5: When the implementation climate is strong, but the technology is not congruent with the user’s workplace values, consistency of technology use will be high, but quality of technology use will be low.
• H6: When the implementation climate is strong and the technology is perceived to be congruent with the user’s workplace values, consistency and quality of technology use will be high.
The Innovation Under Study
• Medical errors associated with medications account for a substantial portion of preventable medical errors.
• In 2008, 1.9 million people became ill or injured from medication errors (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality).
• A new healthcare information technology (HIT) was designed to:– collect an accurate history of medication adherence and– facilitate medication reconciliation by the primary care provider
Research Methods
• Research Site - a large healthcare organization Primary care division alone manages 40,000 patients
and completes an estimated 85,000 outpatient visits per year
• Survey given to 111 primary care providers and residents
• 91 responded
• 53 had access to the HIT
Research Results
• H1 supported• H2 supported• H3 supported• H4 partially supported: full mediation• H5 and H6: supported
Example photo layout
Compatibility w/ Workplace Value
Individual Attributes
Implementation climate
Organizational Attributes
PerceivedUsefulness
PerceivedEase of Use
Consistency of use
Quality of use
Technology Use
Task-Technology AttributesCompatibility w/
Existing Work Processes
H1
H2a
H4
H3a
Research Hypotheses
H2b, H3b
Discussion
• Technology perceptions – predicted technology use.• ease of use (PEOU)• usefulness (PU)
• Determinants of PU and PEOU variables• Compatibility with workplace values• Implementation climate• Compatibility with work processes
Discussion
• The effect of values compatibility on technology use was fully mediated by perceived usefulness.
• Suggests workplace values exert a strong influence on how useful a technology is perceived to be.
• The effect of work process compatibility on technology use was fully mediated by perceived ease of use.
• Suggests work process compatibility exerts a strong influence on perceptions of how easy a new technology is to use.
Discussion
• Climate influenced perceptions of usefulness and ease of use.• Suggests users’ perceptions of a new technology can be
influenced by a strong implementation climate.
• Differential effects of values compatibility and climate on technology use.
• A strong climate predicted consistency of use, but not quality of use.
• Quality of use was found to be a function of climate as well as values compatibility.
Practical Implications
• Understand workplace values from the employees’ perspective. (Useful input to technology development.)
• Stress technology’s compatibility with workplace values when appropriate.
• Create strong implementation climates – Climate construct is a perceptual variable. – Seek feedback on strength of climate.
Practical Implications
• New technologies that involve only incremental change in work processes are more readily accepted.
– Consider phased or modular implementation if possible.– Strong implementation climates can have an impact on
perceived ease of use.
Top Related