MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES
Volume 1 Issue 2
The Animal Nutritionist
The Small Ruminant Edition Research and Development Division
1
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
The Animal Nutritionist
Your portal to up-to-date information on farm animal nutrition
Guest Editor’s Note
Small ruminant production in Jamaica has been on the increase in order to meet increased
demands for sheep and goat meat. This creates an opportunity for farmers to become engaged
in a viable enterprise, thus having a regular source of income.
In this regard, proper nutrition is essential for the health and production of animals and is the
basis of successful production systems.
A well planned and executed preventive health programme cannot overcome problems that are
created by poor nutrition nor can advanced reproductive technologies overcome nutritional
limitations of reproduction. Therefore, nutrition of small ruminants is of paramount importance
for successful small ruminant production.
I therefore emphasize that in your small ruminant production system; make nutrition your main
priority.
Dwight McKie
Livestock Research Officer
The Complexity of Ruminant Digestion
By Tanika O’Connor-Dennie, PhD and Jinte Blistra, MSc
The unique digestive system of ruminants is a result of thousands of years of evolution and
allows ruminants to survive on average to poor quality feed (high fibre and low protein). Their
feeding strategy is simple: Do not spend a lot of time and energy searching for food but
instead eat enormous quantities of stationary and abundant vegetation. This vegetation is rich in
fibre that is not degradable by mammalian enzymes and therefore hardly digestible by
carnivorous and omnivorous animals. The secret of the ruminant’s success lies in its ability to
use symbiotic micro-organisms that can ferment fibre into energy rich by products.
The symbiotic relationship between micro-organisms and their host requires a complex
digestive system that can facilitate fibre fermentation. Fibre can be found in the cell wall of plant
2
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
Figure 1: Overview of the digestive tract of a goat.
cells and it consist of structural carbohydrates (cellulose and hemicellulose) and other
compounds (lignin) that cannot be digested by enzymes in the digestive tract of animals. Some
herbivores, like horses, have an enlarged cecum and colon which enables them to digest
fibrous feeds, but these animals are not as efficient in fermenting fibre as ruminants. Ruminants
are built to feed on high fibre diets and their digestive system shows many adaptations to get as
much energy and nutrients from the low quality feed as possible.
In order to understand the complexity of ruminant digestion and fibre fermentation we must
understand the function of several parts of the digestive tract specific to ruminants. Figure 1
gives an overview of the digestive tract of a goat. It all starts in the mouth where initial grinding
and wetting of the food takes place and saliva plays an important role in this process. The
salivary glands of sheep produce about 15 litres of saliva per day and it has two very important
functions besides lubricating: (1) saliva provides the fermentation vat with fluid and (2) saliva is
used as a buffer against the large
quantity of acid produced in the rumen.
After the food is swallowed it will enter
the rumen and reticulum through the
oesophagus. In these first two sections of
the fore stomach the food is further
wetted and bacteria become attached to
food particles and secrete enzymes to
break down cellulose and hemicelluloses
fromthe plant cell walls. Then a process
will take place that is specific for
ruminants which is called ruminating. The
animal will bring up the plant material
that is now partially digested and it will chew the food again to break down the tough cell walls
even more. Also, re-chewing the food will stimulate saliva production to keep the food wet and
to provide more buffers against the acids formed by the bacteria.
The ruminated plant material will find its way back again into the rumen and reticulum. These
two compartments are often considered as one since free exchange of contents is possible. In
this large vat the masticated and wetted forage is kept for several hours to days while the
bacteria begin to digest the material along the breaks and tears caused by chewing and
ruminating. The bacteria in the rumen are anaerobic, which means that these organisms do not
require oxygen.
3
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
Other animals also make use of anaerobic bacteria in their digestive tract, but the main
difference between the bacteria in ruminants and those in other animals is the quantity. Rumen
fluid can have a million to ten million bacteria per milliliter of fluid and all bacteria break down
the plant material ingested by ruminants. The major product of fermentation is energy in the
form of fatty acids including acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid. The bacteria will use
the fatty acids for energy for themselves or the fatty acids will be absorbed through the cells of
the rumen wall as energy for the host. Other products of fermentation include vitamin K, all
amino acids and B vitamins.
All fermentation of feed takes place in the rumen and reticulum after which it will pass through
the omasum. The function of the omasum is not entirely clear, but it seems as if this
compartment serves as a sieve since it prevents coarse fibre particles from passing through.
This will allow the larger particles, which are likely to contain considerable amounts of
fermentable substrate, to be further digested. Some absorption of water and VFA will take place
while this muscular stomach compartment moves the digesta into the final stomach, the
abomasum.
The abomasum is the ruminant’s “true stomach” and is very similar to the stomach of
monogastrics. In the abomasum gastric juices, including hydrochloric acid and the enzyme
pepsin, are being produced which are necessary to digest protein. Due to a high level of acid in
the abomasum, the bacteria in the digesta are not able to survive and the bacterial cell walls will
successfully be broken down by another enzyme called lysozyme.
The lower gastrointestinal tract of ruminants is again similar to that of monogastrics. Remaining
proteins are broken down in the small intestine and vitamins and minerals are being absorbed.
Some plant fibres may have escaped breakdown along the tract, but when these fibres reach
the cecum and colon another population of anaerobic bacteria will digest and ferment them and
this gives the ruminant a last chance to derive as much energy from their feed as possible.
Overall it can be said that the digestive system of ruminants is very complex. Ruminants are
specialized animals that can get energy from high fibrous forages due to evolutionary
adaptations in their digestive system; adaptations that cannot be found in any other animal
group. Understanding the complex process of digestion in ruminants is one of the first steps to
improve ruminant nutrition and hereby production.
4
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
Classification of Ruminants According to Diet Choice
By Jinte Blistra
Ruminants encompass a large part within the category herbivores as there are about 150
different domestic and wild ruminant species including cows, sheep, goats, deer, buffalo, bison,
giraffe, moose and elk. These animals have been classified as ruminants due to specific
characteristics that they have in common including the practice of ruminating, the possession of
a four compartment stomach, and the dependence on symbiotic microbes to break down
structural carbohydrates. However, even though the digestive physiology of all ruminants
appears very similar it is the differences that we need to pay attention to in order to optimize
feeding practices of ruminants.
The differences in feeding behaviour, digestive physiology and anatomy between ruminant
species can be explained by the characteristics of food that is available. Plants show high
variability in morphology and chemistry which has led to many adaptations within the group of
ruminants. A clear distinction in plants can be made between grasses and browses/shrubs (like
shrub leaves and stems). In general, grasses have a thicker cell wall than browses and their cell
walls mainly consist of slowly digestible plant fibres such as cellulose while browses contain
less cell walls and are therefore easier to break down.
These differences in plant characteristics have forced ruminants to adapt in different ways. One
group has adapted to efficiently digest grasses that are high in fibre while another group has
specialized in digesting browses that are lower in fibre and higher in protein. According to this
concept ruminants have been classified in three different groups: concentrate selectors (also
known as browsers), intermediate feeders, and grass/roughage eaters (also known as grazers).
Figure 1 shows the grazing habits of local ruminants.
5
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
The major difference between the groups lies in the animal’s natural feed choice or more
specifically their preference for grass or browse. Concentrate selectors naturally consume a diet
that consists of at least 75% browse while grass/roughage eaters consume a diet that consists
of less than 25% browse. Intermediate feeders change their feeding behaviour according to the
availability of forage which is highly dependent on season. From figure 1 it can be seen that
sheep and goat do not fall under the same category. Instead sheep, similar to cattle, are
grass/roughage eaters while goats on the other hand are intermediate eaters which indicate that
goats are more flexible in their diet choice.
The differences in plant characteristics have led to various feeding strategies in ruminants and
as result they show different specializations of the digestive tract which allows grazing and
browsing species to optimize extraction of nutrients from their feed. Grazers, which will feed on
high fibre grasses, generally have a larger, more muscular, subdivided rumen/reticulum and a
smaller opening between the reticulum and omasum than browsers. These adaptations will slow
down the passage of digesta to the lower tract which gives grazers more time for the
fermentation of plant fibre. As a result grazers are able to digest cell wall more thoroughly and
obtain more energy per unit of food.
In browsers on the other hand, digesta will move rapidly through the tract due to the fact that
browse contains less cell walls and the fibres within the cell walls are more lignified and
indigestible. As a result browsers have a smaller rumen, which allows a rapid flow of digesta,
and the rumen contains an extensive dense layer of papillae that enlarges the surface of the
6
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
rumen by 22 times. This dense layer of papillae allows efficient absorption of VFA’s (volatile
fatty acids) from the rapidly fermenting cell contents of browse. Also, browsers tend to have a
larger abomasum, cecum and intestines which suggest that browsers rely more heavily on
direct digestion in the true stomach and lower digestive tract than grazers.
Many other differences can be distinguished between browsers and grazers including
differences in salivary glands, liver size, mouth characteristics, and teeth size but the most
important differences have been described above: There seems to be a clear relationship
between plant characteristics and different nutritional needs in ruminant species and
understanding this concept could allow farmers to optimize production by increasing utilization
of their land.
Mixed grazing is a perfect example of benefitting from the differences in feeding behaviour
between ruminant species. Large unselective feeders, like cattle, will mainly feed on grass,
while smaller and more selective species like goats are able to change their diet according to
availability of forage which is mostly dependant on seasonality. In dry seasons goats can
maintain their body weight by feeding on bushes, like acacia (commonly called casha) bushes
which will not be consumed by cattle. A system like this will not only increase the production per
unit area, it will also be very effective against the problem of bush encroachment in pastures.
Also, by understanding the nutritional needs of ruminant species locally available forages could
be better utilized to optimize feeding rations of ruminants, in particular sheep and goats.
Mulberry (Morus spp), leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) trichanthera (Thrichanthera
gigantea), quick stick (Gliricidia sepium), and moringa (Moringa oleifera) are examples of locally
available browse that have the ideal nutrient composition and show high palatability and
digestibility, especially in goats. Exploiting these readily available forages could reduce feed
costs and at the same time increase production.
In conclusion, it is important to be aware of the differences in feeding strategies between
ruminant species as this can create opportunities to increase production. Benefitting from mixed
grazing systems that could significantly increase the production per unit area as well as
exploiting locally available forages for browsing species (like goats) are only 2 examples of
ways to improve local farming strategies. For many farmers it could be worthwhile to reassess
their farm plan and exploit the information presented in this article by applying this theory into
practice.
7
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
General Introduction to Small Ruminant Nutrition
by Tanika O’Connor-Dennie, PhD
Small ruminant production (sheep and goats) has significantly increased in Jamaica over the
last decade. With the introduction of improved genetics through the importation of the Boer
goats and Dorper sheep, comes the need to better understand the nutritional requirements of
these animals. A complete understanding to the nutritional requirements of these animals that
have a higher potential for weight gain (compared to locally available breeds) ensures that
weight gain is maximized without wasting nutrients.
There are five nutrients that must be taken into consideration when developing a complete
nutrition programme for your flock, they are:
1. Water
2. Energy
3. Protein
4. Minerals
5. Vitamins
One additional item can be added, making the list six, and that is fibre/roughage. This article will
only focus on the role water, energy, protein and fibre plays in small ruminant nutrition.
Water
The nutrients are listed in the order of importance for survival in ruminants. Indeed, water is
frequently taken for granted but constituents over 60% of body composition. Whereas sheep
and goats can afford to lose up to 50% of their body protein and 90% of their body fat, just 10%
of water loss is fatal. That’s because water is vital to almost all bodily functions ranging from
temperature control, nutrient transport and acting as a conduit for chemical reactions. It is
recommended that each ewe or doe have at least 1 foot of water through space, which ideally
should be paved to prevent unsanitary conditions and foot-rot. Physiological conditions such as
pregnancy and lactation increases water consumption, with water intake doubling during the last
month of gestation.
Here are the guidelines regarding water intake:
Animals’ water intake should be 2-4 times dry matter intake
Animals should have approximately 3.5-7 litres/day (1-1.5 gallons)
Lactating females should have twice as much water (7-15 litres or 2-4 gallons per day)
8
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
Energy
Energy is the first limiting component in a diet of all livestock animals. As such animals first eat
to meet their energy requirement, then their protein, mineral and vitamin requirements. The
amount of energy sheep and goats require is dependent on the level and stage of production.
Therefore a growing lamb requires a more energy dense diet compared to a ewe that is not
nursing or lambing. It is therefore recommended that animals experiencing rapid periods of
growth, lactation and lambing receive a more energy dense diets in the form of concentrates
and very high quality forages compared to animals that are at maintenance. When animals that
are in a higher stage of production receive diets low in energy they not only experience reduced
growth rates but have lower body scores (ribs and hip bones distinctly visible), poor immune
system and a higher incidence of parasitic diseases (worm infestation).
Because majority of the energy consumed by both sheep and goats come from the breakdown
of roughage (grass and hay), this should be the major component of their diets, this energy is
either expressed as calories or total digestible nutrients (TDN) as a percentage of the feed on
concentrate feed tags and literature. Currently, feed and forage testing at Bodles Research
Station estimate TDN using the Van Soest fibre analysis.
The most common choice for energy supplementation is cereal grains such as corn which
comprises the majority of concentrate feeds. Corn is dense in energy, and most of that energy is
in the form of starch. Consumption of high levels of corn decreases in forage intake and
digestibility in sheep and goats. This however does not affect their energy status because of the
energy from the corn. Unlike corn, wheat middlings (by-product of flour production) does not
suppress fibre digestion and may increase hay digestibility. Often these by-product type feeds
are much more economical than corn. Another source of energy supplementation is fat which
should not exceed 8% of the diet, or 4% to 5% as supplemental fat.
Protein
After meeting their energy needs, small ruminants require a minimum of 7% dietary crude
protein for normal rumen bacterial growth and function. Anything below 7% CP decreases feed
intake digestibility. Like humans, protein deficiency is associated with decreased growth,
decreased immune function, anaemia, depressed feed use, oedema, and death in sheep and
goats.
The type of plant (legumes like cowpeas and wild tamarind have 20-28% CP versus cereal grain
with 7-8% CP), soil fertility, season and vegetative state (protein content of plants declines with
maturity) affects the CP content. Similar to energy needs crude protein requirements vary with
the animal’s stage of production. For maintenance, a 75-kg (165 lbs) ewe requires a diet
9
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
containing 8% to 9% protein, and a 55-kg doe needs a diet with 7% to 8% protein. During
lactation both the ewe and doe require in excess of 13.5% protein, depending on the number of
offspring suckling and level of milk production. Animals at maintenance do not require
additional supplementation beyond well maintained pasture, whereas heavy producing animals
may require supplemental protein. The most consistent sign of protein deficiency in lactating
animals is poor weight gain or slow growth in their lambs or kids, particularly for twins or triplets.
Non-protein nitrogen (NPN) is an inexpensive way to increase the protein concentration of
rations for sheep or goats. NPN is any source of nitrogen in the non-protein form, but the most
commonly used type is urea.
Fibre
Fibre is an important component of the diet of a ruminant animal. Without adequate fibre in the
diet, normal rumination does not occur. In wool producing sheep, feeding a concentrate-based
diet with limited amounts of fibre results in “wool pulling” as the animals seek a roughage
source. To promote a healthy rumen, the dietary fibre content should generally be greater than
50%. Fibre also is required in the diet to maintain acceptable levels of milk fat. It is generally
suggested that a minimum particle size of 1 to 2.5 cm be fed to stimulate normal rumination.
Pelleted roughage does not meet the requirement for fibre size. Animals being fed pelleted
forage or lush pasture should be offered hay.
Nutrition Facts
Feeding Urea as a Non-Protein Source of Nitrogen
by Tanika O’Connor-Dennie, PhD
The following rules of thumb are useful when feeding urea as a protein source:
1. Never use urea for more than one third of the protein in the diet or 3% of the grain portion of
the diet.
2. Ensure that a highly fermentable source of carbohydrates (e.g., corn) is fed along with non-
protein nitrogen (urea and poultry little).
3. Avoid the sudden introduction of urea into the diet (allow at least 8 to 10 days for its
introduction).
4. Ensure proper mixing of feedstuffs whenever urea is used.
5. If 1 pound of urea and 6 pounds of ground corn are cheaper than 7 pounds of soybean meal
(SBM), then the former diet may be efficiently fed. However, if 7 pounds of SBM is less
expensive, the urea should be avoided.
10
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
6. If the crude protein of the diet is greater than 14% of the dietary total digestible nutrient, NPN
is of little value.
For example, if TDN is 45%, NPN is of limited or no value if the crude protein of the diet is
greater than 6.3% (45 x 0.14 = 6.3).
7. Because of varying dietary intakes and their relationship to body condition scoring (BCS),
NPN is best used in sheep or goats with body condition scores greater than 2.5; they should be
avoided in animals with a body condition score of less than 2.
11
Th
e A
nim
al N
utr
itio
nis
t |
Vo
lum
e 1
Iss
ue
2
Photos from the Meat Goat Production Handbook, Langston University, 2007
Top Related