The Hartford Partnership Program for The Hartford Partnership Program for Aging Education Aging Education
Institutional Outcomes Institutional Outcomes and Implications for Policyand Implications for Policy
Linda Weiss, Ph.D.Patricia Volland, MSW, MBA
Victoria M. Rizzo, Ph.D., LCSW-R
Webinar Agenda
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Introductions
• Overview of HPPAE Institutional
Data
• Report on the Impact of HPPAE
• The trained workforce and the
effectiveness of social work
interventions in aging
Overview of HPPAE Institutional Data
www.socialworkleadership.org
Linda Weiss, Ph.D.Director, Center for Evaluation and
ResearchNew York Academy of Medicine
Institutional Level Data Overview
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Data were collected through two surveys, which are included in the HPPAE multisite evaluation document:– Site profile – Institutional Impact
• Institutional level data can be used to predict outcomes (e.g. is a particular rotational model associated with better student outcomes)
• Institutional level data can be the outcome of interest (e.g. was there a sustained change in social work education as a result of the HPPAE)
Site Profile Survey (see p. 30)
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Completed at the end of years 1 and 2 of the grant period by a faculty member. Covers:
• Program description – Number of students– Admission criteria – Application process
• University-Community partnership – Structure– Function– Roles Responsibilities
Site Profile Survey (continued)
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Competency driven education– Use of GSW competencies in HPPAE program– Student seminars– Aging enhanced curriculum– Micro/Macro project requirements
• Fieldwork rotations– Sequential or concurrent, internal or external– # of rotations– Types of agencies
Site Profile Survey (continued)
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Expanded field instructor role– Training– Number– Role
• Recruitment of students– Strategies and their effectiveness– Number of students applying, accepted, enrolling,
completing– Stipends: number, amount, source– Career development activities
Site Profile (continued)
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Other– Website, evaluation,
staffing (and funding sources for staff)
– Sustainability– Benefits, challenges,
adaptations
Institutional Impact Survey
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Completed at the end of the grant period by a faculty member. Covers:– University and Social Work program information
• Academic programs• Gerontological resources• Faculty (# and # with aging expertise)• Students (# and # concentrating in aging)• Aging coursework• Hartford funding received
Institutional Impact (continued)
www.socialworkleadership.org
• Field education– # Faculty, # faculty
designated to work in aging
– # of agencies, # of aging agencies
– # students, # of student in aging placements
Institutional Impact (continued)
www.socialworkleadership.org
• 11 Likert scale questions on program impact. Questions cover perceptions of:– Increased knowledge, interest, and skills related to
aging among students– Increased interest in aging among faculty– Improved linkages to and capacity of field
agencies– Greater emphasis on student leadership– Sustainability and expansion of the consortium,
the rotational model, and the GSW competencies• Additional questions related to impact on the school
and services available to older adults
To access data
www.socialworkleadership.org
• De-identified data from these surveys are available from The New York Academy of Medicine.
• To request data, email:– Bert Chantarat ([email protected])– Linda Weiss ([email protected])
Impact of HPPAE
www.socialworkleadership.org
Patricia Volland, MSW, MBADirector Social Work Leadership, Institute
Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College
HPPAE OutcomesHPPAE Outcomes
The 72 funded programs graduated over 2,600 students by spring 2012The HPPAE has been initiated in a total of 97 programs in 37 states 92% of HPPAE graduates completing the Career Tracking survey were employed,75% in age-related positions25% were working in one of their HPPAE placement sites following graduationThe majority indicated that participation in HPPAE increased their interest in working with older adults and that HPPAE was important in preparing them for their career 95% would recommend the Hartford Internship to other students in aging
HPPAE Impact Deans HPPAE Impact Deans and Directorsand Directors
The National Association of Deans and Directors (NADD) Gerontological Social Work Survey
Majority of schools report HPPAE had a positive impact on: Student learning opportunities School and agency collaboration Field instruction Curriculum development Image and reputation of MSW program
HPPAE and Student HPPAE and Student RecruitmentRecruitment
91% agreed that their personal goals in learning to work with older persons and their families were achieved in their field practicum
Aging knowledge increased significantly from pre- to post-test
92% agreed that rotations enabled them to learn about the range of services to older people
91% agreed that having experiences in more than one field agency or department was useful
Synergistic relationship with field agencies is advantageous for students’ education and career development
Impact on Social Work Impact on Social Work Schools and EducationSchools and Education
University – Community PartnershipsIncreased collaboration and communication
Schools reported an average of between five and 25 agencies in the partnership
Most schools met with partner organizations quarterly or monthly
Partnership functions included the following in order of frequency:
Program planning & oversight Student selection Evaluation Student recruitment Curriculum development Fundraising
Impact on Social Work Impact on Social Work Schools and EducationSchools and Education
www.socialworkleadership.org
2000, core geriatric social work competencies developed
Measure students pre and post competencies in aging field education
Refined to create Geriatric Social Work Competencies Scale II
Used by Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) in adoption of competency-based education in 2008 Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS)
HPPAE Sustainability and HPPAE Sustainability and InstitutionalizationInstitutionalization
76% of adoption schools report that the rotational model will be sustained
37% of adoption schools report that the rotational model will be expanded
Development of interprofessional collaboration across university campuses
Institutionalization of HPPAE within CSWE and the Gero Ed Center
VA/GRECC & HPPAE VA/GRECC & HPPAE InitiativeInitiative
New collaboration launched in 2012 with John A. Hartford Foundation, Veterans Administration (VA) Geriatric Research and Clinical Centers (GRECC), and SWLI to implement HPPAE in select VA/GRECCs and schools of social work
VA is the largest employer of social workers in the country currently 11,000 social workers
Stipends secured for MSW students placed at VA/GRECCs and a number of VA hospitals concurrently enrolled in HPPAE
VA/GRECC & HPPAE VA/GRECC & HPPAE InitiativeInitiative
Partnerships developed between the school of social work, the VA/GRECC and HPPAE model
VA/GRECC provides a breadth of services – offering a broad experience for students participating in internal rotations
High quality services provided at the VA/GRECC to veterans and their families plus inter-professional collaboration in education
VA/GRECC & HPPAE VA/GRECC & HPPAE Year 1 2012- 2013Year 1 2012- 2013Student OutcomesStudent Outcomes
10 MSW students graduated from the 3 pilot sites in spring 2013 Salt Lake City, Utah VA/GRECC Birmingham, Alabama VA/GRECC Madison, Wisconsin VA/GRECC
Results from the pre to post tests showed an overall improvement in HPPAE student’s knowledge of aging
A significant improvement in competency levels in all 4 Domains:1) Values, Ethics and theoretical perspectives2) Assessment3) Intervention4) Aging services, programs and policies
VA/GRECC & HPPAE VA/GRECC & HPPAE Student OutcomesStudent Outcomes
Majority of students agreed that their personal goals in learning to work with older persons and their families were achieved in their field practicum
Majority of students agreed that rotations enabled them to learn about the range of services to older people
Majority of students agreed that having experiences in more than one field agency or department was useful
VA/GRECC and HPPAE VA/GRECC and HPPAE Year 2 2013 - 2014Year 2 2013 - 2014
VA/GRECC, VA and HPPAE sitesOrientations conducted at VA Medical Centers:
Baltimore VA/GRECC New England, Boston and Bedford VA/GRECC San Antonio, VA/GRECC Northport, LI, VA
4 new schools of social work adopt HPPAE9 trained mentors from 7 HPPAE grantee programs12 students recruited for academic year 2013-2014
VA/GRECC and HPPAE VA/GRECC and HPPAE Year 3 2014 - 2015Year 3 2014 - 2015
Orientations to be conducted at VA Medical Centers: Puget Sound VA/GRECC Palo Alto VA/GRECC Gainesville, VA/GRECC San Francisco, VA
3/4 schools of social work new to HPPAE identified 8 mentors identified from 7 HPPAE grantee
programs Students to be recruited for academic year
2014-2015
VA/GRECC and HPPAE VA/GRECC and HPPAE Year 3 2014 - 2015Year 3 2014 - 2015
3 new VA/GRECC sites to be identified
1 new VA site to be identified
New schools invited to adopt HPPAE
New mentors from grantee schools collaborate in partnerships
The Trained Workforce and the Effectiveness of Social Work
Interventions in Aging
www.socialworkleadership.org
Victoria M. Rizzo, Ph.D., LCSW-RInterim Department Chairperson &
Associate Professor, Binghamton University
Acknowledgements
www.socialworkleadership.org
• The work presented here is based on two systematic reviews:
• Rizzo, V., & Rowe, J. (2006). Studies of the efficacy of social work services in aging with a focus on cost outcomes: A review of the literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 67-73.
• Rizzo, V., & Rowe, J. (2013). Studies of the cost-effectiveness of social work services in aging: An updated review of the literature. White Paper.
Background
www.socialworkleadership.org
2006 Systematic Review Published in Research on Social Work
Practice Included 40 articles reporting results of 34
studies published from 1987 to 2003 Review revealed social work (SW)
interventions can have positive impact on quality of life, health care costs, & use of health care services
1/3 of articles included cost outcomes
2013 Update of Study
www.socialworkleadership.org
Precipitating Events
Passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Completion of the Hartford Social Work Geriatric Initiative (HGSWI)
2013 Update of Study:Research Questions
www.socialworkleadership.org
1) What is the current knowledge of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of social work interventions in aging? How is the current knowledge the same/different from the results of the first systematic review?
2) Does the current empirical evidence demonstrate the unique contribution of social work to the efficacy and efficiency of interventions in aging?
2013 Update of Study:Research Questions
www.socialworkleadership.org
3) Can the social work profession make a convincing argument to policymakers about the importance of social work interventions in aging using the current empirical evidence under ACA? In other words, does the current literature provide the empirical evidence the social work profession needs to make the case for more flexible Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement of social work services?
Results
45 articles report results of 43 studies in 7 categories:1)Care coordination/case management/care management (12 articles/9 studies)2)Depression/mental illness (7 articles/studies)3)Transitions in care (4 articles/studies)4)End-of-life/palliative care/advanced illness (10 articles/studies)5)Caregiving (3 articles/studies)6)Disease management/other (4 articles/studies)7)Geriatric evaluation and management (5 articles/studies)
Quality of Life Outcomes
1) 63% of articles (n =28) reported at least 1 positive QOL outcome (i.e., general health, mental health, mortality).
2) 25% (n = 11) reported positive outcomes for treatment planning and/or adherence.
3) 1 study reported impact of social work processes in Hospice setting on patient outcomes
Cost Outcomes
1) 47% (n = 21) included cost outcomes.
2) 27% (n = 12) used direct cost outcomes.
3) 15.5% (n = 7) used indirect measures for which costs could be calculated
4) 4.4% (n = 2) used both direct and indirect measures.
Quality of Life Outcomes
13 articles in 4 intervention categories [care coordination (n = 6), end-of-life/palliative care/advanced illness (n = 5), caregiving (n = 1), & GEM (n = 1)] reported positive & significant cost outcomes.
Quality of Life Outcomes
Outcomes included:
1.Decrease in hospital admissions
2.Decrease in length of stay
3.Decrease in cost of care
4.Decrease in ED visits
5.Decrease in service utilization
6.Decrease in nursing home placement/length of stay/costs
Discussion
Question #11.Results demonstrate SW interventions can have positive & significant impact on QOL & cost outcomes.2.# of published outcome studies increased by 10% since last review.3.50% focus on care coordination and end-of-life/palliative care/advanced illness. Caregiving and GEM predominate in original review.4.47% include cost outcomes compared to 33% in previous review. 58% include direct cost outcomes compared to 64.3% in original review.
Discussion
Question #21.Only 3 studies focused on the specific contributions of social work in the intervention.2.Authors excluded 2 articles in social work journals because interventionists were not identified as social workers.3.One article the authors knew included social work interventionists was excluded because social workers were not identified in article.4.We must be able to explain the unique contribution of social work with research evidence to be taken seriously.
Discussion
Question #3Answer is complex. There is evidence social work can make an impact.
BUT. . .
Unique social work contribution is not easily identifiable because (1) specific contributions of social work are not defined OR measured.
HPPAE & Effectiveness
1. GSWI has developed a trained workforce and scholars. We can use this to develop evidence for the effectiveness and efficacy of social work interventions.
2. Professional development training is needed to educate practicing social workers so they understand value of intervention/applied research in practice not just academia. The John A. Hartford Foundation initiatives support focusing on practice – the frontline workforce.
Top Related