The Criminal Trial
Chapter 12
In order to stand trial, a criminal defendant must be considered
mentally competent to understand the nature and extent of the legal
proceedings.
If defendants are considered mentally incompetent, their trials must
be postponed until treatment renders them capable of participating in
their own defense.
The Right to be Competent at Trial
Provides for a control over hearsay evidence and allows the veracity
of witnesses to be challenged
Helps the accused in preparation of a defense to know who will
present testimony for the state
Does not necessarily mean a face-to-face confrontation
Legal Rights During Trial: The Right to Confront Witnesses
This right is guaranteed for all serious crime - not all crime
Constitution does not require a 12 person jury, smaller juries may be
permitted
The Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments do not mandate a
unanimous verdict in all cases
Legal Rights During Trial: Right to a Jury Trial
“The person who represents himself has a fool for a client”
Requires a competent, knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of
counsel
Requires the defendant to understand the charges
Legal Rights During Trial: Self Representation(Pro Se Proceedings)
Improve the credibility of the trial
Reduce defendant anxiety
Avoid pretrial publicity
Avoid adverse effects on the ability to present a defense
Legal Rights During Trial: Right to a Speedy Trial
Constitution does not specify a time limit
Most states have adopted statutes which
define reasonable limits
Federal Speedy Trial Act of 1974
Provides time limits for various stages of the adjudication process
Provision for fining defense counsels causing delays
Time Limits for Speedy Trials
At issue are competing constitutional and social interests
The public’s right to know
The defendant’s right to a fair process
Fair Trial vs. Free Press
Trial before an impartial judge and jury
In an environment of judicial restraint and orderliness
With fair decision making
What is “Fundamental Fairness”?
Hostile courtroom crowd
Improper pressure on witnesses
Prejudicial behavior toward defendant
Defendant wearing prison clothing
Adverse pretrial publicity
What isn’t Fair?
Televisions are permitted in many states at the judge’s discretion
Televisions, still cameras and video recorders are not permitted in
federal courtrooms
The legal community is divided over the advantages and
disadvantages of televising criminal trials.
Televisions in the Courtroom
State and federal laws control when a jury trial is available
State and federal laws control what kind of a jury trial is available
State and federal laws control what rules govern jury trials
How Are Jury Trials Controlled?
A process for selecting jurors who are unbiased and objective
A pool of prospective jurors (the venire) is called to jury duty
Through a process of random selection, prospective jurors are
called for a case (the jury panel)
Panel members are selected randomly to be questioned by the
court, prosecution and defense
Jurors and alternates are selected to try a case
Successfully challenged jurors (dismissed from a case) are returned
to the pool to finish their jury term
The Voir Dire
To determine if someone is unfit to serve
Prosecution & defense want someone who is sympathetic to their
side of the case
Judge and both sides ask questions
Number of these challenges is unlimited
Challenge for Cause
Enable attorneys to excuse jurors for no particular reason or for
undisclosed reasons
Number of challenges are limited
Can’t be used to eliminate jurors on the basis of race, ethnicity or
gender
Peremptory Challenges
Job is to try the facts
Size determined by law - normally 12
Decision normally by unanimous vote
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt needed
Jury Trials
Jury trials are longer and slow down the process
Longer sentences are normally associated with jury trials rather than
bench trials
Men are normally more dominant in jury deliberation
What Do We Know About Juries?
1/3 of all cases only require one vote
If a decision needs more than one vote, the decision of the majority
of the first vote will likely end up being the decision on the last vote in
most cases
What’s Known About Jury Voting?
Testimonial evidence from witnesses
Real or physical evidence
Circumstantial or indirect evidence
Criminal Evidence
Judge’s responsibility
Provides jury with information about the law
Elements of the crime
Evidence required for proof
Burden of proof required
Improper instructions are often the basis for an appeal
Instructions to the Jury
Guilty
Judge will normally set a date for sentencing and ask for a
presentence investigation report
Not guilty
Defendant is free to leave
Hung jury
Case may be retried
The Verdict
Normally after review of a pre-sentence investigation report in felony
cases
Rules applying to discretionary decisions by judges regarding the
kind and severity of sentence vary among jurisdictions
One of the most important and visible decisions by the judge
Sentencing
Right to appeal is determined by law
An appeal waives the right against double jeopardy
Based upon some contended legal error
“Plain error” vs. “harmless error” concept
Court transcript serves as the basis for appellate review
Right to Appeal
The judiciary needs more minority and female members
Use of DNA evidence needs to become commonplace in this century
New communication technologies need to be utilized to improve the
effectiveness of the trial
Jury selection procedures and jury service during the conduct of a
trial need to be improved
Judge’s need to summarize the law and facts of a case before it
goes to a jury must be examined
Trial Reform
Top Related