7/27/2019 Test for Intuition (Cappon, 1993)
1/3
#47 from R&D InnovatorVolume 2, Number 7 July 1993
A Test For Intuition
by Daniel Cappon, M.D.
Dr. Cappon is a physician in psychological medicine and Professor of Environmental Studies
at York University, Ontario, Canada. He wrote a book, Intuition (Bedford House Press,
1991), and developed a board game based on his Intuition Quotient Test.
www.informedliving.com
What follows is the heart of a protracted endeavor to demythologize intuition. Compared with
conscious reasoning, intuition is the older and greater capacity of human intelligence and is the
secret of success in most human endeavors. (See my, "Intuition from Instinct," R&D Innovator,
Vol. 2, No. 2.) There are two reasons for this work. The first is to wrestle this gift of human
intelligence out of the grasp of metaphysics and parapsychology and place it firmly where it
belongs: in scientific psychology. The second is to develop tools by which intuition can better
be used.
Ive been looking for measurable tests to compare intuitive capacity, just as various tests
compare Intelligence Quotients. I want to develop an assessment for intuition, the Intuition
Quotient (IQ2). Although a highly intuitive person will have a high IQ2 overall, certain intuitives
will have a cluster or an individual skill score higher than other intuitives.
The test is in its early phase, and must be validated, modified and continually improved. While
this initial foray into measuring intuitive capacity will be far from perfect, its a step we musttake to learn more about such an important human quality. Certainly, effective scientists and
technologists have a well-developed intuition. Can it be further improved? Can others improve
their intuitive capacities?
The Capacity for Intuition
I define the capacity for intuition in terms of some skills: half are passive input skillsand
half are active output skills. These skills test the ability to access intuition. When this
capacity is activated, the resultingprocess of intuition helps determine behavior.
These skills can be enumerated in a hierarchical order from perceptual to cognitive, and thence
to the higher levels of skills like foresight, hindsight, and decision making.
The skills tested by IQ2 include:
A. Input
Quick eyes and seeing through thingslike spotting danger in an eye-blink and seeing
hazard through fog.
Finding things fastlike finding a familiar face in a group photo.
Seeing the big pictureby looking at its fragments.
Estimating time, dimensions, or weightwithout the use of tools or machines.
Knowing what you never realized that you knowlike understanding words from a foreign
Article 47- A Test for Intuition http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_ind...
1 of 3 01/10/2013 20:16
http://www.informedliving.com/http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_indhttp://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_indhttp://www.informedliving.com/7/27/2019 Test for Intuition (Cappon, 1993)
2/3
language.
Passive imaginationmeasured by the number and frequency of images coming to mind.
B. Output
Foresightanticipation of an event.
Hindsightunderstanding the cause of something without having all the details.
Having a hunchthe initial and likely answer to a problem.
Knowing the best way to reach a solution.
Knowing the best application of a discovery.
Knowing the best time to intervenein the stock market, for example.
Knowing the meaning of thingslike the significance of a symbol.
Having an active imaginationimages readily come to mind when stimulated by objects or apicture.
Having skill at sortingwhat does and does not go together.
The IQ2 is meant to measure all these skills in both an aggregated total and a disaggregated
(by cluster or skill) numerical score. The instrument is ultimately meant to yield a reliable and
valid measure of intuitive intelligence. True intuitives are only credible in the area of a persons
experience and expertise.
Because we see objects rapidly and because imagery is information economically packaged,
the test is totally visual. A laser video shows 350 pictures on a screen. Because the IQ2 tests
the oldest and most central part of intelligence, it asks all the fundamental questions in alanguage (what, how, when, etc.); the objects shown represent the universe of familiar objects
(animate and inanimate). The types of questions are basic to everyday life and survival,
primitive or archetypallike the discovery of fire, shelter, the use of food and medicines.
To score, the pictures are shown in sequence which gives progressively more clues about the
answer. For instance, the first picture in a series might show a devastated area with hills
above a valley, and ask: What did this? The picture was of an actual scene after a volcanic
explosion. The choices to the IQ2 test taker are: logging, forest fire, diseased trees, volcano,
or chemicals. The next two pictures provide incremental clues, and last shows an atomic-like
explosion as from a volcano. The person who knew that the volcano was the cause from the
first picture would score four, the person who realized the correct answer from the clue in the
next picture would get three, and so on. Anyone who missed after all the clues would score
zero.
Possible Value of IQ2
Now that several hundred people have taken the test, it is being validated experimentally, at
first against peoples self assessment and others assessments as high, average or low
intuitives and who have a similar range of success at work and at home. The final validation
will be against a normative population seen by themselves and others as varying in intuition and
also measured against the measures of success I am currently devising.
A validated IQ2 would help answer such questions as: Does everyone have intuition? Do
women have more than men? How do you tell the difference between a lucky guess and good
intuition?
Ultimately, I intend to work on the metrics of success with individuals, groups, and
organizations. Ill define success in several ways. For instance, in private or work life, in the
Article 47- A Test for Intuition http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_ind...
2 of 3 01/10/2013 20:16
http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_indhttp://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_ind7/27/2019 Test for Intuition (Cappon, 1993)
3/3
individual or an organization. Criteria for success include efficiency, productivity, profitability,
effectiveness, satisfaction, and health. Ill try to relate IQ2 data to professional success and to
determine the relationship of success to IQ scores and IQ2 scores.
The obvious application for this work lies in human resources, measuring the effects of intuition
training and maximizing the application of intelligence to all its vital functions for a person or an
organization. These applications include decision-making in science, technology, business, and
the arts, as well as in everyday life.
Unless the scientific validation of measurement applies a stamp of approval to intuition, this
jewel in the crown of intelligence will not play its necessary role in a world where life is
becoming more difficult and where planetary survival is truly at risk. Thats why I'm devoting so
much effort to the test and its validation.
1-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300
301-350 351-400 401-450 451-500501-550 551-600
601-650
2006 Winston J. Brill & Associates. All rights reserved.
Article 47- A Test for Intuition http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_ind...
3 of 3 01/10/2013 20:16
http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_indhttp://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_indTop Related