43
TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH EUROPEAN ENIQ
RECOMMENDED PRACTICE NO. 2 FOR THE ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION OF
DISSIMILAR WELDS AT SURGE LINE NOZZLES
A. Krüger, TÜV NORD EnSys Hannover, Germany B. Rückelt, intelligeNDT, AREVA NDE-Solutions,
Germany
INTRODUCTION
Due to German safety standards defined by the Nuclear Safety Commission (KTA) dissimilar welds in the
primary coolant circuit have to be inspected recurrently. The German safety standard KTA 3201.4 [1] de-
mands qualification of the inspection techniques in accordance with the German ENIQ-Guideline R516
[2]. An important part of an ENIQ-Qualification is the technical justification. With the intention to demon-
strate the advantages of technical justifications in this paper, an example is given for the examination of a
dissimilar weld.
Dissimilar welds are characterized by anisotropic structure of the weld seam leading to a significant
degradation of the ultrasonic signal with strong attenuation, backscattered signal and skewing of the beam.
In this conjunction the technical justification plays a very important role in choosing the suitable inspec-
tion technique and reducing time and effort in search of an optimized technique.
This contribution presents the main parts of the technical justification under consideration of the
German way of qualification of ultrasonic inspection techniques and with point of view of an independent
expert organisation / qualification body. The influential and essential parameters are discussed and the
choice of value for the main parameters such as probe-type, wave-mode, frequencies, angle of incidence,
crystal-size, focal zone, axial and spatial resolution is justified. Experimental results are presented to ex-
plain the choice of the parameters and some instructions for a practical trial on a reference block are given.
MAIN ELEMENTS OF TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATIONS
The ENIQ methodology document defines a technical justification (TJ) as “an assembling convincing evi-
dence on the effectiveness of the test including previous experience of its application, experimental stud-
ies, mathematical modeling, physical reasoning” [3].
The elements of a technical justification are in accordance with German ENIQ-Guideline R516 [2]
and the European ENIQ Recommended Practice No. 2 [3]:
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Summary of Relevant Input Information
Component data
Defects
ISI objectives / required inspection performance
44
Inspection method
Section 3: Overview of Inspection System
Section 4: Analysis of Influential Parameters
Input parameters
Procedure parameters
Equipment parameters
Section 5: Physical Reasoning (Qualitative Assessment)
Section 6: Prediction by Modelling
(Quantitative Assessment)
Section 7: Experimental Evidence
Results from other qualifications
Results from trials
Experimental studies
Field experiences
Section 8: Parametric Studies
Section 9: Equipment, Data Analysis and Personnel Requirements
Section 10: Review of Evidence Presented
Section 11: Input on Test Pieces for Experimental Trials
Section 12: Conclusions and Recommendations
Section 13: References
The main elements of the TJ are accentuated in bold letters. The development of the main elements
of a new TJ will be shown in the example that follows.
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT INPUT INFORMATION AND INSPECTION TARGET
The target of this TJ is the inspection of the inner surface of the dissimilar weld between surge line and
nozzle at the main coolant pipe of German pressure water reactors from the outside (Figure 1). The inspec-
tion technique chosen is an automated ultrasonic inspection system with phased array transducers.
The input data is all related information such as the information regarding the area or component to
inspect, type and features of expected defects, and qualification objectives. The component and defect in-
fluential variables, which are the subject of our analysis, are summarised in the Tables 1 and 2.
45
Figure 1: Surge line nozzle, object to be inspected
The qualification defect is given by Safety Standard KTA 3201.4 (2010-11). The type of the defect
is a sparked notch with size 20 x 3 mm (length x depth) in base material, weld / buttering and cladding,
figure 2. The weld is to be examined from both sides. For detecting of transverse defects the qualification
defect shall be positioned in the weld metal and the buttering. Where the width of the weld metal (includ-
ing the buttering) is less than 20 mm, the notch length shall be limited to the width of the weld metal (in-
cluding the buttering) on the inner surface.
Table 1 – Component data Table 2 – Defect description
Nozzle OD 440 mm Orientation Circumferential and
transverse
Thickness 46 mm Type Planar, postulated
Width of welding +
buttering
about 27 mm Position Inner surface, surface
breaking
cladding 5 mm Tilt ±10 mm
Material of fitting and
cladding
Austenite 1.4550 Qualification defect 20 x 3 mm (l x d) in
base material, weld/
buttering and cladding
Material of nozzle 20 MnMoNi 55
Flatness deviation < 0,5 mm
The demanded recording level is the echo height of the qualification defect (reference reflector) de-
pending on the position plus a sensitivity allowance of 6 dB. The criteria for acceptance of the inspection
technique are stated in Safety Standard KTA 3201.4 section 4.2.3.3.3.
46
Figure 2: Scanning directions
ANALYSIS OF INFLUENTIAL PARAMETERS AND IDENTIFICATION OF ESSENTIAL
PARAMETERS (with range of value and tolerances)
The influential parameters are all related parameters affecting the result of the inspection. The influential
parameters are divided into three groups:
Input parameters
Procedure parameters
Equipment parameters
“Those influential parameters whose change in value would actually affect a particular inspection in
such a way that the inspection could no longer meet its defined objectives are defined as the essential pa-
rameters.” [4]
Input data
All input data, already presented in previous section, is essential because input data determines the objec-
tive of the inspection to be qualified. Remarkable changes of the input data would affect the task in such a
way that the proposed UT inspection technique no longer fulfills this task. However, tolerances of the in-
put data may be stated: e.g.
outer diameter: 440mm ± 10%
wall thickness: 46mm ± 10%,
thickness of buttering: 5 mm ± 20%,
temperature of the component: 30°C +20°/-20° etc.
Procedure parameter
The main influential and essential variables of the UT inspection technique, which are subject of our anal-
ysis, are summarised in Table 3. There are some more procedure parameters to be analyzed (e.g. scanning
pattern and scanning speed) but in this paper we reduce the treatment to the main group of UT inspection
parameters. The physical reasoning for the choice of the parameters and their values are explained in the
47
following chapter.
Table 3: Influential and essential procedure parameters
Equipment parameters
The equipment parameters are not achieved in this paper. Further information is given in Appendix 2 of
ENIQ Recommended Practice No. 1 [4].
PHYSICAL REASONING (Qualitative Assessment) AND EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCES
Probe type
The phased array technique and twin transducer probe influences the inspection essentially.
By phased array technique
angle of incidence could be optimized electronically with respect to the welding geometry
(weld-edge preparation),
a number of angles are generated simultaneously best angle is selected at evaluation,
sound flied could be focused electronically to realise focal point at required depth.
A twin-probe reduces
influence of transmitter pulse,
influence of backscattered signals because of separation between scanning direction of transmit-
ter and scanning direction of receiver.
48
Frequency
Dissimilar welds are characterized by anisotropic structure of the weld seam leading to a significant deg-
radation of the ultrasonic signal with strong attenuation, deflection and backscattered signal from weld
filler metal and buttering. This influence increases with decreasing wave length or increasing frequency.
Therefore frequency should be as low as possible with respect to sufficient defect detection (detection of
the qualification defect). Figure 3 shows for 1 MHz shear wave in comparison to 2 MHz shear wave a
much more clear C-scan picture of the defects (named “Nut1 – Nut7”). The red colour in the pictures cor-
responds to reflections or backscattering with high amplitude. The colour blue corresponds to low ampli-
tudes. A good compromise is: 1 MHz for shear wave
Figure 3: Selection of frequency
Bandwidth
High resolution (separation of nearby defects) demands short pulse length ( broad bandwidth). A good
signal-noise-ratio (detection of small defects) demands high strength of the pulse ( small bandwidth). A
good compromise is: Bandwidth 30% - 40%.
Angle of incidence:
The sound path through the structure of the weld / buttering should be as short as possible in order to re-
duce disturbance and deflection of sound propagation. Therefore an angle of 50°-56° for shear waves as
preferably flat angle of incidence (see red arrow in figure 4) was chosen. For longitudinal wave mode an
angle of 44°-48° and 60° delivers the best results.
In Figure 4, the C-scan pictures with an angle of incidence of 44°-48° (left side) and 50°- 56° (right
side) are presented. 13 indications from defects at different positions in the weld are clearly recognisable
on the right hand side. At an angle of 44°-48° only 5 indications are clearly recognisable. Red, dark blue
49
and black colour in the pictures corresponds to reflections with high amplitude.
Figure 4: Selection of angle of incidence
Essential parameter wave mode
For detection and analysis of defects in the weld seam two wave modes shall be used:
Shear waves show a good signal-noise-ratio and an amplitude dynamic depending on defect depth
in the base material and in the region near-by to the weld metal (adjacent base material), figure 5 upper
blue curve. This effect of amplitude dependence on defect depth is used for defect sizing. Shear waves are
less suitable for defect assessment in the weld metal and buttering due to the bad sound transmission
through anisotropic, coarse-grained materials (austenitic weld metal, buttering and cladding).
It is known from other experiences that longitudinal waves are better suited for sound transmission
through anisotropic, coarse-grained materials, but longitudinal waves possess no amplitude dynamic de-
pending on defect depth, figure 5 yellow curve and figure 6. The reflections from all the defects in the test
block are nearly of the same echo height, figure 6. But longitudinal waves produce diffraction/bending ef-
fects at defect edges (tip echo). In figure 7, the tip echo could clearly be distinguished from the corner
echo. The distance between these two echos is used for defect depth sizing, figure 7. Thus longitudinal
waves are used for defect sizing of defects in the weld metal and buttering.
50
Figure 5: Signal amplitude as function of the defect depth
Figure 6: Longitudinal wave for defect detection in the weld metal and buttering
51
Figure 7: Defect depth description by tip echo
Essential parameter crystal size
Transducers are selected large enough, so that near-field length is equal or greater than sound path to the
area to be inspected. Thus the sound path could be electronically focused (phased array) to the location to
be inspected. As a consequence, the lateral resolution is increased with simultaneously high sound pres-
sure at location to be inspected (by large transducers).
Essential parameter focal point
The sound field of the phased-array probes is focused electronically to realise focal point at required depth
or sound path length. The sound path to the inner surface at an angle of incidence of 52° amounts to 74
mm. Thus the focal length of the shear wave probe is adjusted to 70 mm.
Influential parameter delay path:
Delay path is affected by the size of the crystal and the angles of incidence to be realised. The dimensions
of the refracting wedge should be as small as possible to reduce the size of the probe housing as much as
possible. The realised values are specified in Tab. 3.
Essential parameter scanning direction
Scanning directions have to be chosen in such a way that postulated defects are struck nearly perpendicu-
lar. This is realised for circumferential defects by axial intromission of sound and for transverse defects by
circumferential intromission of sound.
Influential parameter probe size
The probe housing has to be adapted to the size of the crystal, refracting wedge and transducer backing.
The size of the housing is constructed as small as possible in order to minimise the coupling area. The re-
depth
tip echo
52
alised values are specified in Tab. 3.
INPUT ON THE TEST PIECES FOR EXPERIMENTAL TRIALS
A test piece where all the specified parameters could be evaluated is given in Fig. 8. The related defect po-
sitions are stated below the sketch of the test block.
Figure 8: Test block for experimental trials
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Specialized inspection parameters (frequency, angle of incidence, focal point etc.) with longitudinal and
shear waves are proposed as inspection techniques for dissimilar welds. The inspection techniques deter-
mined in this paper for the respective inspection zones of the dissimilar weld provide a reliable inspection
result concerning the detection of defects. Concerning the depth sizing of possible indications the use of
shear waves in the adjacent base material and longitudinal waves combined with crack tip echo techniques
in the weld area should allow sufficiently exact statements. By using a TJ it was possible to increase the
inspection reliability by compiling all the supporting evidence available. The TJ minimises the reliance on
test pieces and it also allows generalizing specific test piece data very effectively.
REFERENCES
1) Safety Standards of the Nuclear Safety Commission (KTA)
KTA 3201.4 (2010-11); Components of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of Light Water
Reactors Part 4: In-service Inspections and Operational Monitoring www.kta-gs.de
53
2) VGB PowerTech Guideline Methodik für das Vorgehen bei der Qualifizierung von zerstörungs-
freien Prüfungen VGB-R 516, 2010
3) ENIQ Recommended practice 2: Strategy and Recommended Content for Technical Justifications,
Issue 2, ENIQ report nr. 39, EUR 24111 EN, 2010.
4) ENIQ Recommended practice 1: Influential / Essential Parameters, Issue 2, ENIQ report nr. 24,
EUR 21751 EN, 2005.
Top Related