7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
1/68
A
PROJECT REPORT
ON
JOB EVALUATIONAT
BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICALS LTD.
Submitted by
SUSHEEL MISHRA
(Ht.No: 098-06-146)
Submitted to
AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH UNIVERSITY
In partial fulfillment of the Award of
MASTERS DEGREE IN BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION
St.PAULS P.G. COLLEGE(Affiliated to Osmania University & Approved by AICTE )
Sy.No. 603,604 & 605,Thurka Yamjal (vill), Hayath Nagar (Mdl.),R.R. Dist.
(2006-2008)
1
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
2/68
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this Project Report titled JOB
EVALUATION submitted by me to the Department of
Business Management, O.U., Hyderabad, is a bonafide work
undertaken by me and it is not submitted to any other University
or Institution for the award of any degree diploma / certificate or
published any time before.
Name and Address of the Student Signature of the Student
2
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
3/68
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
At the outset, I wish to thank the management of BIRLA ERICSSON
OPTICALS LTD. for their kind gesture of allowing me to undertake this
project and its various employees who lent their helping hand towards the
completion of the study.
I am practically indebted to Mr.G.V.K GURUNATH ,HR
DIRECTOR,BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICALS LTD. for allowing me to
carry out my project work in the origination and Mr.ANAND SONI
HRM, faculty member for apprising me of the situation with
necessary guidance & help me to complete this project. .
I would like to thank Mrs. INDIRA , Principal
of St.Pauls P.G. College, who have given her co-operation and
encouragement during the course of the project work.
Place:
Date: SUSHEEL MISHRA
3
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
4/68
Table of contents page no
Chapter: 1 Introduction
Objectives 6
Limitations and Scope 8
Chapter: 2 Review of literature Introduction to HRM 10
Job Evolution 12
Selection of Job Evolution method 26
Chapter: 3 The Company 35
Chapter: 4 Data analysis and presentation 52
Chapter: 5 Appendix Questionnaire 67
4
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
5/68
Chapter - 1
Introduction
5
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
6/68
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The purpose of this study is multifold.
This study examines the causes for Job Evaluation in a BEOL company.
This study also tries to identify employee working conditions on job.
This study attempts to suggest employee self assessment.
This study also to know the employee performance
This study examines the reasons for employee attrition
Data Collection
For the purpose of the study data were collected from two sources. One is the primary
source by administering questionnaire to the respondents and the second is through
company brochures, booklets, CIQbsites and other secondary sources.
6
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
7/68
Limitations of the study
There are nearly 150 employees in the BEOL company of which, I have done
my project work on JOB EVALUATION.I have taken only 60 as sample size
and have analyzed but not the total employees working in this branch.
The questionnaire is distributed to the employees and analyzed beyond it is
true or not.
The options chosen by the employees may be honest or dishonest.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY:
The scope of the study is to find out reasons for JOB EVALUATION and suggesting
the retention of employee, hiring of employee etc.
7
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
8/68
Chapter 2Review of
literature
8
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
9/68
Introduction to Human Resource Management
Human resource management (HRM) is a relatively modern label for the range of
themes and practices involved in managing people. It is defined and described in a
variety of (sometimes contradictory) ways.
This excerpt from Human Resource Management in a Business Context introduces
the concept of human resource management. It outlines HRM as a philosophy of
people managementand provides a framework for its role within the business context.
People management - Human resource management has not 'come out of nowhere'
HRM has absorbed ideas and techniques from a number of areas. In effect, it is a
synthesis of themes and concepts drawn from over a century of management theory
and social science research.
There is a long history of attempts to achieve an understanding of human behavior in
the workplace. Throughout the twentieth century, practitioners and academics have
searched for theories and tools to explain and influence human behavior at work.
Managers in different industries encounter similar experiences: businesses expand or
fail; they innovate or stagnate; they may be exciting or unhappy organizations in
which to work; finance has to be obtained and workers have to be recruited; new
equipment is purchased, eliminating old procedures and introducing new methods;
9
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
10/68
staff must be re-organized, retrained or dismissed. Over and over again, managers
must deal with events, which are clearly similar but also different enough to require
fresh thinking.
We can imagine that, one-day, there will be a science of management in which these
problems and their solutions are catalogued, classified, standardized and made
predictable. Sociologists, psychologists and management theorists have attempted to
build such a science, producing a constant stream of new and reworked ideas. They
offer theoretical insights and practical assistance in areas of people management such
as recruitment and selection, performance measurement, team composition and
organizational design. Many of their concepts have been integrated into broader
approaches, which have contributed to management thinking in various periods and
ultimately the development of HRM.
10
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
11/68
Job Evaluation
Learning Objectives:
1. To know basic approach to Job Evaluation.
2. to importance of Job Evaluation and its effectiveness.
3. To know the important methods of Job Evaluation.
Now friends CIQ will discuss about how jobs used to be evaluated in an organization;
if somebody having any idea about it pleases start explaining it; this can be explained
in the following way. Job evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the
various jobs systematically to ascertain their relative worth in an organization. Job is
evaluated on the basis of their content and is placed in the order of their importance. It
should be noted that in a job evaluation programme, the jobs are ranked and not the
jobholders. Jobholders are rated through performance appraisal. Job evaluation is a
process of finding out the relative worth of a job as compared to other jobs Now,
who is going to explain the objectives of job evaluation? The following objectives are
derived from the analysis of the above-mentioned definitions: - 1) To gather data and
information relating to job description, job specification and employee specifications
for various jobs in an organization. 2) To compare the duties, responsibilities and
demands of a job with that of other jobs. 3) To determine the hierarchy and place of
various jobs in an organization. 4) To determine the ranks or grades of various jobs.
5) To ensure fair and equitable wages on the basis of relative worth or value of jobs.
11
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
12/68
In other words equal wages are fixed to the jobs of equal worth or value. 6) To
minimize wage discrimination based on sex, age, caste, region, religion etc. How
many of you know the principles of job evaluation programme? Job evaluation
programme should be implemented carefully. The following principles help in
successful implementation of the programme:
1. Rate the job but not the employee. Rate the elements on the basis of the job
demands. 2. The elements selected for rating should be easily understood.
3. The elements should be defined clearly and properly selected.
4. Employees concerned and the supervisors should be educated and convinced about
the programme.
5. Supervisors should be encouraged to participate in rating the jobs.
6. Secure employee cooperation by encouraging them to participate in the rating
programme.
7. Discuss with the supervisors and employees about rating but not about assigning
money values to the points.
8. Do not establish too many occupational wages.
For, better understanding let us look at the flowchart given below: Job Evaluation
Process Employee Classification Wage Survey Job Evaluation ProgrammeJob
Specification Job Description Job Analysis Objectives of Job Evaluation Job
Evaluation Process:
The job-evaluation process starts defining objectives of evaluation and ends with
establishing wage and salary differentials. The main objective of job evaluation, as
12
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
13/68
was stated earlier, is to establish satisfactory wage and salary differentials. Job
analysis should precede the actual program of evaluation.
Job analysis, as was discussed earlier, provides job-related data, which would be
useful in drafting job description and job specification. A job-evaluation program
involves answering several questions: The major ones are: Which jobs are to be
evaluated? Who should evaluate the jobs? What training do the evaluation need?
How much time is involved? What should be the criteria for evaluation? What
methods of evaluation are to be employed? Which jobs are to be evaluated in any
exercise, where there are more than 30 or 40 jobs to be evaluated, it is necessary to
identify and select a sample of benchmark jobs, which can be used for comparisons
inside and outside the organs.
The benchmark jobs should be so selected to achieve representative sample of each of
the main levels of jobs in each of the principal occupations. The size of the sample
depends on the number of different jobs to be covered. It is likely to be less than about
five percent of the total number of employees in the organization and it would be
difficult to produce a balanced sample unless at least 25 percent of the distinct jobs at
each level of the organization were included.
Staffing the Evaluation exercise: A committee, which consists of Head of several of
departments, as was pointed out earlier, does representatives of employee unions and
specialist drawn from the National Productivity council Job evaluation. HR specialists
will be normally the chairmen of the committee. Responsibility for the overall
coordination of the job-evaluation programme should be in the hands of a senior
13
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
14/68
executive who can then report its progress to the board, and advise it on ensuring
wage and salary development. Training for the Committee:
Members of the job-evaluation committee should be trained in its procedure so as to
make the program successful. Time Factor: Job evaluation should not be conducted in
haste. Any rushing through will lead to appeals against the grading of jobs. Eight jobs
in a day can be the ideal pace. After this, the quality of evaluation tends to drop, and
more time has to spend later in checking and assessing the validity of the grading.
The final review of all the time should be allowed for re-evaluation, if necessary.
Isolating Job-evaluation criteria: The heart of job evaluation is the determination of
the criteria for evaluation. Most job evaluations use responsibility, skill, effort and
working conditions as major criteria. Other criteria used are difficulty, time-span of
discretion, size of subordinate staff, and degree of creativity needed.
It needs no emphasis that job evaluation criteria vary across jobs. So friends
you must have got a fair idea what is job evaluation; now CIQ will discuss what are
the methods involved in job evaluation, Methods of Job Evaluation: Job-evaluation
methods are of two categories-Analytical and Non Analytical Job Evaluation
Analytical Non Analytical Point Factor Comparison Ranking Job-grading Banding
Method Analytical:
1. Point Method 2.Factor Comparison Method Point Method
14
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
15/68
The system starts with the selection of job factors, construction of degrees for each
factor, and assignment of points to each degree. Different factors are selected for
different jobs, with accompanying differences in degrees and points. Let us discuss
the different factors with an example: The National Electrical Manufacturing
Association (NEMA), USA has suggested the factors, degrees and point for hourly
rated and salaried jobs. The job factors taken into consideration by NEMA for hourly
rated jobs are: Skill Education Experience Initiative & ingenuity Effort Physical
demand Mental and / or visual demand Responsibility for equipment or process
Responsibility for materials or product Responsibility for safety of others
Responsibility Job Conditions Working conditions >Hazards NEMA Manual for
salaried jobs Factors: - Education Experience Complexity of duties Monetary
responsibility Working Condition Contacts Types of Supervision
Extent of Supervision Factor-Comparison Method: The factor-comparison method is
yet another approach for job evaluation in the analytical group. Under this method,
one begins with the selection of factors; usually five of them- is assumed to be
constant for all the jobs. Each factor is ranked individually with other jobs. For
example, all the jobs may be compared first by the factor mental requirements. the
skills factor, physical requirements, responsibility, and working conditions are ranked.
The total points are then assigned to each factor.
The worth of a job is then obtained by adding together all the point values. Non-
Analytical:1. Ranking Method 2. Banding Method 3. Job-Grading Method Non-
analytical methods: Ranking and job classification methods come under this category
15
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
16/68
because they make no use of detailed job factors. Each job is treated as a whole in
determining its relative ranking. Ranking method: this is the simplest, the most
inexpensive and the most expedient method of evaluation. The evaluation committee
assesses the worth of each job on the basis of its title or on its contents, if the latter is
available.
But the job is not broken down into elements or factors. Each
job is compared with others and its place is determined. The method has several
drawbacks. Job evaluation may be subjective, as the jobs are not broken into factors.
It is hard to measure whole jobs. Ranking is the most straightforward method of work
evaluation. Jobs, people, or even teams can be ranked from the ones adding most
value to least value to the organization.
Criteria for the ranking are not made explicit. Jobs rather than people are easier to
rank when there are a large number of people in jobs. Teams can be ranked in a team-
based environment as a substitute for or addition to the ranking of jobs and people.
When a larger number of jobs, people, or teams are to be ranked, the method of paired
comparisons can be used. With this approach each entity is compared to every other
entity in terms of value to the organization. Overall value of the entity is determined
by the number of times that the entity is evaluated as being of greater value then the
entity being compared against. If an extremely large number of comparisons need to
be made, statistical formulas are available to reduce the number of comparisons
required using sampling theory.
Advantages:
1. Simple to use if there is a small number of a job, people, or teams to evaluate
16
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
17/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
18/68
1. Subtle, but important, differences between groups ignored
2. Subtle, but important, differences within groups ignored
3. May invite inequity perceptions Classification: Classification systems define the
value of jobs, people, or teams with written standards for a hierarchy of classification
level. Each classification level may be defined by a number of factors that need to be
present for a job, person, or team to be slotted into a particular classification level.
These factors are usually blended together resulting in one standard for each
classification level. Advantages
1. Jobs, people, and teams can be quickly slotted into the structure
2. Classification levels have face validity for employees
3. Standards to establish value are made explicit
Disadvantages
1. Many jobs, people, or teams do not fit neatly into a classification level
2. Extensive judgment is required because standards used to define each factor are
blended together
3. Differences between classification levels may not be equal
4. Creates status hierarchies within organizations
5. Extensive administration required Job-grading Method: As in the ranking method,
the job-grading method (or job-classification method) does not call for a detailed or
quantitative analysis of job factors. It is based on the job as a whole. The difference
between the two is that in the ranking method, there is no yardstick for evaluation,
while in the classification method; there is such a yardstick in the form of job classes
or grades. Under the classification method, the number of grades is first decided upon,
and the factors corresponding to these grades are then determined.
18
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
19/68
The advantages of the method are; I) job grade descriptions are vague
and are not quantified; ii) difficulty in convincing employees about the inclusion of a
job in a particular grade because of vagueness of grade descriptions; and iii) more job
classification schedules need to be prepared because the same schedule cannot be
used for all types of jobs. Let us now discuss the few important measures to improve
Job Evaluation. HOW TO IMPROVE JOB EVALUATION: - Following measures
and steps for improving the work of evaluation programmers;
A job evaluation scheme should be chosen cautiously. It should be devised
and administered on the basis of employment market, demand for labour, bargaining
power of the parties & job conditions.
The details of the scheme should be drawn up in such a way that they do not
conflict with other provision of a collective agreement.
The scheme should be sold to all concerned and suggestions sought. Give
major importance that the number of job titles and classification be kept to a
minimum.
Any anticipated changes in methods should be carried out before a scheme is
installed and all modifications in it should be resisted until it becomes fully
established.
In preparing job descriptions it is a sound practice to emphasis in them the
things which makes one job different from another rather than to find a
comprehensive statement of all the duties of the job.
The better the state of industrial relations the easier it is to introduce a job
evaluation scheme. Essentials for the success of a Job Evaluation Programme
Following are the essential for the success of Job Evaluation:
19
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
20/68
1. Compensable factors should represent all of the major aspects of
job content. Compensable factors selected should:
2. Avoid excessive overlapping or duplication,
3. Be definable and measurable,
4. Be easily understood by employees and administrators,
5. Not cause excessive installation or admin cost and
6. Be selected with legal considerations in mind. Operating
managers should be convinced about the techniques and
programme of evaluation.
They should also be trained in fixing and revising the wages based on job
evaluation All the employees should be provided with complete
information about job Evaluation techniques and programme.
All groups and grades of employees should be covered by the job evaluation The
results of job evaluation must be fair and rational and unbiased to the individuals
being affects Summary: A job evaluation scheme should be chosen cautiously. It
should be devised and administered on the basis of employment market, demand for
labour, bargaining power of the parties & job conditions.
Job Evaluation In a preceding section CIQ have seen that internal equity in pay is one
of the requisites of a sound primary compensation structure. Managements method to
achieve equity in pay is jab evaluation. It is the cornerstone of formal wage and salary
programme.
20
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
21/68
The central purpose of job evaluation is to determine the relative worth of jobs of an
enterprise. It thereby helps in establishing fair pay differentials among jobs. Accord-
ding to Knowles and Thompson2evaluation is useful in eliminating the following
discrepancies of a wage paymentsystem:Paying high wages and salaries to persons
who hold jobs and positions not requiring great skill, effort andresponsibility;Paying
beginners, less than they are entitled to receive interims of what is required of
them;Giving a raise to persons whose performance does not justify the raise;
Deciding rates of pay on the basis of seniority rather thanability;LESSON
25:PERFORMANCE COUNSELING AND JOB EVALUATION 12811.672.1
Copy Right: Rai University HUMAN RESOURCES PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT Paying widely varied wages for the same or closely related jobs
and positions; and Paying unequal wages and salaries on the basis of race, sex,religion
or political differences. Advantages of Job Evaluation According to an LL.D.
publication3, job evaluation enjoys the following advantages
(a) It is an objective and logical method of rankil1g jobs and of removing unjust
differentials in the existing wage structure.
(b) It helps in fining new jobs at their appropriate places in the existing wage
structure.
(c) It improves labor-management relations by reducing grievances concerning
relative wages in the long run.
(d) It establishes an objective and clear basis for wage bargaining.
(e) It simplifies wage administration by making wage rates more uniform.
(f) It reveals the possibilities of more efficient use of the plants labor force by
pointing out jobs which need less or more skilled workers than those who are
21
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
22/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
23/68
managements support and it assures the employee that his wages will not be reduced
as a result of a programme.Effective results have also been attained through the
publication and distribution of booklets, which explain in some detail the general
principles of job evaluation.2. Selection of Jobs to Be Evaluated Due to difficulties of
time and money all jobs and positions within an enterprise are not evaluated at one
time. Most companies in the beginning evaluate only shop jobs and office work.
Executive, professional, and technical jobs are usually excluded. But later on when
conditions permit these jobs are also brought into the plan. Sometimes a pilot plan is
installed to evaluate a group of jobs within a single department or in single plant of a
multi-plant company. If the plan works well, its extended to other units in the
organization.3. Preparing job descriptions and job specifications Before any job can
be evaluated it is necessary to know what the duties of the job are. A job description is
required, therefore, indicating in considerable detail the duties and responsibilities of
each job or position in the enterprise. From these job descriptions, individual job
specifications are prepared.
On the basis of the information contained in these job specifications individuals in the
enterprise are evaluated. Before employing any job specification for evaluation
purposes, its accuracy and acceptance should be thoroughly checked. It should be
made certain that there are no omissions and-duplication of responsibilities in it and
that it has been harmoniously accepted by the employee concerned. Once all job
specifications covering jobs selected for evaluation have been thus checked and
agreed upon CIQ have the foundation for determining the relative worth of each job
through one of several methods of job evaluation described below.4.
23
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
24/68
Appointment of A Committee to Perform JobEvaluation:Job evaluation may be
carried out either by the employees or by outside consultants or by employees and
outside consultant)jointly. In the first case, a committee consisting of senior,
experienced and respected representatives of management and workers is constituted.
Employees participation in job evaluation work reduces their doubts and suspicions
about deprogrammed. But the committee lacks objectivity and speed because its
members have to carry out job evaluation work in addition to their normal duties.
These disadvantages are removed when job evaluation is performed by outside
experts who generally work on a full time basis. Employees. However, resent
appointment of outside experts and view them with suspicion and doubt. These
experts may also lack intimate knowledge about the problems of the enterprise. As
such the best course is to ask both employee representatives and consultants to
perform job evaluation jointly. The joint venture makes it possible to combine the
intimate knowledge of the company possessed by the employees with the necessary
expertise of the consultants.
24
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
25/68
Selection of A Job Evaluation Method
As a student will read in the following section there are in use today four basic
methods of job evaluation. While the basic approaches of all these methods are
somewhat similar, they differ in their detailed procedures. Some methods are
designed specifically for evaluating clerical and administrative jobs; others work best
when applied only to operative jobs. Sometimes it may be decided to evaluate the
same jobs by two t different methods. The greater the amount of agreement between
the two results, the greater would be their reliability..6. Periodic Review periodic
review, usually every one or two years, of all job descriptions must be done. Many job
evaluation programmehave failed because management failed to recognize this fact.
A periodic review of all job descriptions is important for tworeasons:One, it softens
the feelings of those who believe that their work was not properly described or
evaluated last time and that they will get a fair deal at the time of review. Two, it
enables management to keep itself abreast of changes taking place in the nature of a
job. As the nature of a job changes factors which form the basis of job evaluation also
change. Thus automation of job reduces physical effort and increases
responsibility. The need for daily application of a skill is also reduced but the need
for potential skill in emergencies increases. New factors, aches machinery utilization
and isolation from fellow workers become important.
Methods of Job Evaluation Determining the relative worth of all jobs in the enterprise
is difficult. Different jobs make varying demands on workers. One job, for example,
might demand a prescribed level of education; require a certain physical ability, or
25
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
26/68
exact specific responsibilities from an employee, whereas another job may be very lax
in these aspects. A job, therefore, differ with repeat to thedemands made on the
employee as well as in value to theenterprise.Job evaluation compares all demands
made on each workerand, by means of this comparison, establishes the relative worth
of each job in an enterprise.
The comparison undervaluation may be made on a non-quantitative basis by simply
ranking or classifying the jobs from lowest to highest, or on a quantitative basis where
points value are assigned to the various demands of a job, and its relative worth
determined by the sum of such point values. Job evaluation programme should be
implemented carefully. The following principles help in successful implementation of
the programme:
1. Rate the job but not the employee. Rate the elements on the basis of the job
demands.
2. The elements selected for rating should be easily understood.
3. The elements should be defined clearly and properlyselected.
4. Employees concerned and the supervisors should be educated and convinced about
the programme.
5. Supervisors should be encouraged to participate in rating the jobs.
6. Secure employee cooperation by encouraging them to participate in the rating
programme.
7. Discuss with the supervisors and employees about rating but not about assigning
money values to the points.
8. Do not establish too many occupational wages. For, better understanding let us look
at the flowchart givenbelow:Job evaluation process The job-evaluation process starts
26
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
27/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
28/68
percent of the distinct jobs at each level of the organization were included. Staffing
the Evaluation Exercise A committee, which consists of Head of several of
departments, as was pointed out earlier, does representatives of employee unions and
specialist drawn from the National Productivity council Job evaluation.
HR specialists will be normally the chairmen of the committee. Responsibility for the
overall coordination of the job-evaluation programme should be in the hands of a
senior executive who can then report its progress to the board, and advise it on
ensuring wage and salary development. Training for the Committee Members of the
job-evaluation committee should be trained units procedure so as to make the program
successful. Time Factor Job evaluation should not be conducted in haste. Any rushing
through will lead to appeals against the grading of jobs. Eight jobs in a day can be the
ideal pace. After this, the quality of evaluation tends to drop, and more time has to
spend later in checking and assessing the validity of the grading.
The final review of all the time should be allowed for re-evaluation,
ifnecessary.Isolating Job-evaluation Criteria the heart of job evaluation is the
determination of the criteria for evaluation. Most job evaluations use responsibility,
skill, effort and working conditions as major criteria. Other criteria used are difficulty,
time-span of discretion, size of subordinate staff, and degree of creativity needed.
It needs no emphasis that job evaluation criteria vary across jobs. So friends you must
have got a fare idea what is job evaluation; now CIQ will discuss what are the
methods involved in jobevaluation.Methods of Job Evaluation Job-evaluation
methods are of two categories- non-analytical and analytical. Job
28
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
29/68
EvaluationAnalyticalNon Analytical Point Ranking Factor Comparison Ranking
Job-grading
MethodAnalytical1. Point-Ranking method2. Factor comparison MethodNon-
Analytical1. Ranking Method2. Job-grading method on-analytical Methods Ranking
and job classification methods come under this category because they make no use of
detailed job factors. Each job is treated as a whole in determining its relative ranking.
Ranking Method this is the simplest, the most inexpensive and the most expedient
method of evaluation. The evaluation committee assesses the worth of each job on the
basis of its title or on its contents, if the latter is available. But the job is not broken-
down into elements or factors.
Each job is compared with others and its place is determined. The method has several
drawbacks. Job evaluation may be subjective as the jobs are not broken into factors. It
is hard to measure whole jobs.
Ranking is the most straightforward method of work evaluation. Jobs, people, or even
teams can be ranked from the ones adding most value to least value to the
organization. Criteria forth ranking are not made explicit. Jobs rather than people are
easier to rank when there are a large number of people in jobs. Teams can be ranked
in a team-based environment as a substitute for or addition to the ranking of jobs and
people. When a larger number of jobs, people, or teams are to be ranked, the method
of paired comparisons can be used.
With this approach each entity is compared to every other entity interims of value to
the organization. Overall value of the entity is determined by the number overtimes
29
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
30/68
that the entity is evaluated as being of greater value then the entity being compared
against. If an extremely large number of comparisons need to be made, statistical
formulas are available to reduce the number of comparisons required using sampling
theory.
Advantages
1. Simple to use if there is a small number of a job, people, or teams to evaluate
2. Requires little time
3. Minimal administration required
Disadvantages
1. Criteria for ranking not understood
2. Increases possibility of evaluator bias
3. Very difficult to use if there is a large number of jobs, people, or teams to
evaluate4. Rankings by different evaluators are not comparable5. Distance between
each rank is not necessarily equal6. May invite perceptions of inequity
Banding procedure takes place when jobs are grouped together by common
characteristics. Characteristics used to group jobs follow: exempt versus nonexempt,
professional versus nonprofessional, union versus nonunion, key contributor versus
non-key contributor, line versus staff, technical versus on-technical, value-added
versus non-value-added, and classified versus non-classified. Often these groups are
then rank ordered and each group is then placed in a pay band.
30
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
31/68
Advantages
1. Quick and easy procedure
2. Has initial face validity to employees
3..Allows for organizational flexibility
4. Minimal administration required
Disadvantages
1. Subtle, but important, differences between groups ignored
2. Subtle, but important, differences within groups ignored
3. May invite inequity perceptionsClassificationClassification systems define the
value of jobs, people, or teams with written standards for a hierarchy of classification
level? Each classification level may be defined by a number of factors that need to be
present for a job, person, or team to be slotted into a particular classification level.
These factors are usually blended together resulting in one standard for each
classification level.
Advantages
1. Jobs, people, and teams can be quickly slotted into the structure
2. Classification levels have face validity for employees
3. Standards to establish value are made explicit
Disadvantages
1. Many jobs, people, or teams do not fit neatly into a classification level
2. Extensive judgment is required because standards used to define each factor are
blended together
3. Differences between classification levels may not be equal
4. Creates status hierarchies within organizations
31
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
32/68
5. Extensive administration required Job-grading Methods in the ranking method; the
job-grading method (or job-classification method) does not call for a detailed or
quantitative analysis of job factors. It is based on the job as a whole.
The difference between the two is that in the ranking method, there is no yardstick
for evaluation, while in the classification method; there is such an yardstick in the
form of job classes or grades. Under the classification method, the number of grades
is first decided upon, and the factors corresponding to these grades are then
determined. The advantages of the method are; I) job grade descriptions average and
are not quantified; ii) difficulty in convincing employees about the inclusion of a job
in a particular grade because of vagueness of grade descriptions; and iii) more job
classification schedules need to be prepared because the same schedule cannot be
used for all types of jobs. Analytical Methods Point-ranking Method The system starts
with the selection of job factors, construction of degrees for each factors, and
assignment of points to each degree. Different factors are selected for different jobs,
with accompanying differences in degrees and points. Factor-Comparison Method
The factor-comparison method is yet another approach for job evaluation in the
analytical group.
Under this method, one begins with the selection of factors, usually five of them- are
assumed to be constant for all the jobs. Each factor is ranked individually with other
jobs. For example, all the jobs may be compared first by the factor mental
requirements. The skills factor, physical requirements, responsibility, and working
conditions are ranked.
32
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
33/68
COMPANY PROFILE
33
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
34/68
Birla Ericsson Optical Limited (BEOL), an IS/ISO 9001:2000 andIS/ISO - 14001:2004 certified company under the M.P. Birla Groupof Industries entered into the field of optical communication, byway of manufacturing optical fibre cables, in technical and financialcollaboration with Ericsson Cables AB, Sweden (now known asEricsson Network Technologies AB, Sweden).
Ericsson is a leading name in telecommunications for the last 110years, with activities ranging from turnkey telecom networks to
Cellular Mobile Telephone Systems and BusinessCommunications. M/s Ericsson Cables AB are the pioneers in S-Zstranding and Ribbon Cable technologies for optical fibre cables.
BEOL has installed capacity of above more than 53,000 cableKms. per annum to produce complete range of optical fibre cablesincluding ribbon type optic fibre cable made to design andconstruction conforming to national and international standards.BEOL has the capability to produce speciality fibre optic cables for
use in medical equipment, computers and local area networks,cable TV network or any other type as per customizedspecification.
BEOL also has installed capacity to produce 43.25 lac conductorKms. of jelly filled copper telephone cables complying to nationaland international standards ranging from 5 pair to 2400 Pair andalso has capability to produce switchboard cables for switchingequipment.
BEOL has fully computerized system for process monitoring andquality control to ensure consistency and reliability of its entireproduct range. All production activities are carried out as perapproved quality assurance plan. BEOL, therefore, provides thebest possible solutions with latest state of the art technology.
BEOL has an exclusive marketing agreement with M/s AFLTelecommunications for sale of hi-tech overhead fibre optic cables,specially OPGW and associated accessories which find
applications with electric power utilities etc.
34
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
35/68
BEOL has marketing arrangement with M/s ILSINTECH Co. Ltd.
Quality policy
Birla Ericsson Optical Limited (BEOL), an IS/ISO 9001:2000 and IS/ISO -
14001:2004 certified company under the M.P. Birla Group of Industries entered into
the field of optical communication, by way of manufacturing optical fibre cables, in
technical and financial collaboration with Ericsson Cables AB, Sweden (now known
as Ericsson Network Technologies AB, Sweden).
Ericsson is a leading name in telecommunications for the last 110 years, with
activities ranging from turnkey telecom networks to Cellular Mobile Telephone
Systems and Business Communications. M/s Ericsson Cables AB are the pioneers in
S-Z stranding and Ribbon Cable technologies for Optical Fibre Cables.
BEOL has installed capacity of above more than 53,000 cable Kms. per annum to
produce complete range of optical fibre cables including ribbon type optic fibre cable
made to design and construction conforming to national and international standards.
BEOL has the capability to produce speciality fibre optic cables for use in medical
equipment, computers and local area networks, cable TV network or any other type as
per customized specification.
BEOL also has installed capacity to produce 43.25 lac conductor Kms. of jelly filled
copper telephone cables complying to national and international standards ranging
from 5 pair to 2400 Pair and also has capability to produce switchboard cables forswitching equipment.
BEOL has fully computerized system for process monitoring and quality control to
ensure consistency and reliability of its entire product range. All production activities
are carried out as per approved quality assurance plan. BEOL, therefore, provides the
best possible solutions with latest state of the art technology.
BEOL has an exclusive marketing agreement with M/s AFL Telecommunications for
sale of hi-tech overhead fibre optic cables, specially OPGW and associated
accessories which find applications with electric power utilities etc.
35
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
36/68
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Birla Ericsson Optical Ltd. is committed to : Comply with Environmental legislations and prevention of
pollution
Make all efforts for continual improvement in theEnvironmental performanceWe shall conserve the resources and minimize theEnvironmental impact of our operations on Air, Water, andLand By :
Implementing Environmental Management System to meetthe objectives and targets
Bringing awareness amongst all employees
36
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
37/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
38/68
Mr. R.K. LAKHERA (PERSONNEL OFFICER)Mr. VINAY NIGAM (ASST. PERSONNEL
MANAGER)
Mr. Harsh V. Lodha Chairman
Mr. Janne Sjoden(Alternate Mr. S.K.
Daga)
Mr. Magnus Kreuger
(Alternate Mr. Dinesh
Chanda)
Mr. A.P. Dadoo
Dr. Aravind Srinivasan
38
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
39/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
40/68
Technical (Rewa)
Mr. Raghu Nair Sr. Vice President (Works)
Mr. J.K. Mahajan Asstt. Vice President(Prod.&QA)
Mr. Sanjeev DubeyAsstt. Vice President (Devp. &
Maintt.)
Mr. B.S. Sisodia General Manager (Production)
Mr. Shekhar BanerjeeDy.General Manager (QA & ProductDevp.)
Mr. Maneesh NayakDy.General Manager (Design &
Devp.)
Core strength
Birla Ericsson Optical Limited (BEOL), has been a majorplayer in the telecom industry and proven core strengths like
Pioneer in the field of OFC & Copper Cables since 1992.
Experienced, Skilled Engineers and work force. Diversified Product Range.
40
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
41/68
Excellent Financial Strength. IS/ISO-9001:2000 and IS/ISO-14001:2004 certification. Collaboration with Ericsson Network Technologies AB of
Sweden, the world leader in Telecommunication Industries
State of the art Plant & Machinery. Fully computerized & Air-conditioned manufacturing facilities
Approval with TSEC, Indian Railways (RDSO), Engineers IndiaLtd., Director General of Quality Assurance (Ministry of Defence),DGS&D, Dun & Bradstreet.
Certification detail
Birla Ericsson Optical Ltd. Rewa is committed to achieve customersatisfaction by meeting the customer's requirements as well as theapplicable product related statutory and regulatory requirementsand has also been awarded quality certifications from reputedagencies.
COMPETITORS OF COMPANY
41
http://www.birlacables.com/images/CERTAULAB.jpghttp://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/images/ISOnew.pdf7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
42/68
STERLITE INDUSTRIES
Telecommunication has become the buzzword today the entry of
private sectors into the basic services sector compiled with the
governments increased allocation of resources and access toleasing/deferred credit is expected to further accelerate the
telecommunication drive in the country.
The department of telecommunication (Dot) has decided to replace
all trunk lines with optical fiber cables and in tune with this the company
has also commissioned to optical fiber cable plant.
UNIFLEX CABLES
UNIFLEX cables limited are an existing profit making company
manufacturing a variety of power cables, which are sold mainly to
government org.
The company is diversifying in to manufacturing telesales optical
fibers cables (OFC) with a capacity to produce 4,000 cable Km. and in to
jelly filled telephone cables (JFTC) with a capacity to produce 12.5 lacks
crores Km. per annum.
Some others company of telecom sector is as Follows:
I. Vindhya Telelinks Ltd.
II. Paramount communication Ltd.
III. M.P. Telelinks Ltd.
IV. Finolex telecom Ltd.
PRODUCT PROFILE
42
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
43/68
PRODUCT OF B.E.O.L.-
The main product of company is: -
fiber cables.
Optical Jelly filled cables (PIJFTC)
Fiber Ribbon Cable (FRC).
1) OPTICAL FIBRE CABLES: -
Birla Ericsson Optical Limited Manufactures all type of optical
fiber cables for use in communication type of optical fiber cables for use
in communication data transmission, Internet, E-commerce and
multimedia. The company is fully equipped to manufacture all types of
Duct/Armored optical fibro cables including ribbon type optical, custom
made to shit the individual requirement of any customer conforming to
any national or international specification.
COMCENTRIC LOOSE TUBE CABLE: -
PRIMARY coated fibers are protected in loose tube of
PBTP/Polyamide filled with a special thyrotrophic gel in order to prevent
water penetration. The loose tube containing fibers are standard around
the control strength member of fiber-reinforced plastic for better pulling
strength.
A later of polyethylene sheath acts as a cushion for the cable
core, the outer jacket is made of polyamide to offer a more resistance to
mechanical and environmental efforts.
CENTRAL LOOSE TUBE CABLE: -
Primary coated fiber are protected in loose tube PBTP/Polyamide
filled with a special thyrotrophic gel in order to prevent water penetration.
To provide cushioning, a circular layer of polyethylene is executed
around
43
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
44/68
the loose tube containing fibers. The strength members are
embedded this layer of polythene to provide the required pulling strength.
2) JELLY FILLED CABLES: -
Birla Ericsson Optical limited manufactures polythene insulated
(both solid and from skin) Jelly filled underground telephone cables for
use in local distribution network and for Junctions between exchanges;
these cables form a vital link for telecommunication distribution system.
These can be used for large capacity exchanges used by department of
telecommunication, MTNL, on Major cities and also for small exchanges
used in ruler areas and for local networks in industries. These are also use
by railways defense departments and various others specials users.
Cable is available in conductor size 0.4, 0.5, .63 and .9 mm
diameter with cables sizes varying from 10 pair to 2400 pairs.
These cables are generally conforming to Indian P & T department
specification. These can also be custom made suitable to individual
requirement of any customer or to other national or international
specifications.
3) OPTICAL FIBRE RIBBON: -
After decreasing sales of Optical Fiber Cable Company diversify
his product in to fiber ribbon cable.
44
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
45/68
PLANT TOUR OF B.E.O.L.
45
http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/http://www.birlacables.com/7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
46/68
QUALITY FEATURES-
Quality Features are assured through systematically structuredquality planning and its execution covering every stage ofoperation starting from Purchase and up to Packing and Dispatch.People at work are adequately trained and given elbow space toimplement quality infusion and quality check at every stage
All the latest equipments and gadgets, required to observe, test,evaluate and check every feature of Optical Fibre are importedfrom world's best manufacturer and installed at our Test Centers.
Proof Testing : Fibre is tested to stand certain specified strain levelto conform strength, using an advance proof testing machine.
In addition to above, other test facilities for various other tests areEnvironmental Chambers, Ovens, Hydrogen Ageing Equipment,
System for Static Fatigue and Dynamic Fatigue Tests etc.We also take services from Outside Quality Agencies like IICT, CABS,
CACT, RITES, ETDC, IIT, ERDA, Lloyds, Sameer, CSIO etc
46
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
47/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
48/68
whether it belongs to the new economy or the old one. However, the organization of
the new economy also includes (apart from hardware and software) the information
system and the skin ware that is the human.
This era has also seen inclusion of manpower of an organization as an asset in the
balance sheet of the company. Infosys was the Indian company to have done this. The
latest trend includes the human resource information system, human resource audit
etc.
This complete turnaround in the position of HR has made the concept of JOB
EVALUATION all the more imperative, while JOB EVALUATION itself is a
relatively old concept. Its important has been greatly enhanced during the past decade.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY:-
The scope of the study is to prepare the participant of the management to take the
decision while working with any organization.
During this period the students are send to different section to know everything of that
section in detail so that she/he gets over all picture of the working conditions ,Of that
section or department. The participant prepares project report and mentions
suggestions and gives recommendation where ever necessary
OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:
48
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
49/68
The overall objective of taking up a project on job evaluation is to study and evaluate
the job evaluation system in BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICALS LTD.. The importance
of the job evaluation as a tool for growth and development of both employees and the
organization it is now been realized that simply having a good system in place does
not make the firm successful. This has therefore given a need for integrating the
strategic concerns of a firm with its performance monitoring system.
The following are the objectives behind taking up the study at BIRLA
ERICSSON OPTICALS LTD.
The main objective of the study is to gather reliable information on Job
evaluation system adopted in BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICALS LTD..
To study and examine the existing Job evaluation procedure in BIRLA
ERICSSON OPTICALS LTD..
To study scope of prevailing system.
To know the employees views regarding JOB EVALUATION methods
followed in BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICALS LTD..
To access the impact of JOB EVALUATION on the actual performance of the
employees.
To make recommendations and suggestions for further improvement of the
system, with permission of the authorities.
METHODLOGY OF THE STUDY:
49
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
50/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
51/68
is possible that some errors might have crept in while collecting data or in the
preparation of the report due to the following reasons
Lack of experience on part of the researcher.
Errors in tabulation and analysis of the data may weaken the exactitude.
Sample size may not be enough
The answers given by the respondents may be biased or not true
Time is a constraint
51
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
52/68
Chapter - 5
Data Analysis and Presentation
AGE
52
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
53/68
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
54/68
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid GRADUATES
14 23.3 23.3 23.3
POST
GRADUATES
20 33.3 33.3 56.7
PROFESIONALS
26 43.3 43.3 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
QUALIFICATION
N Valid 60
Missing 0Mean 2.20Std. Deviation .798Variance .637
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
QUALIFICATION
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Frequency
Mean = 2.2
Std. Dev. = 0.798
N = 60
Histogram
54
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
55/68
GENDER
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid MALE 26 43.3 43.3 43.3FEMALE
34 56.7 56.7 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
GENDERN Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 1.57Std. Deviation .500Variance .250
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
GENDER
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frequency
Mean = 1.57
Std. Dev. = 0.5
N = 60
Histogram
55
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
56/68
Amount of work I am expected to do on my job is reasonable
Q1
Frequen
cy Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e PercentValid Strongly
Disagree12 20.0 20.0 20.0
Disagree 16 26.7 26.7 46.7Neutral 10 16.7 16.7 63.3Agree 8 13.3 13.3 76.7StronglyAgree
8 13.3 13.3 90.0
N/A 6 10.0 10.0 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
StatisticsQ1
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.03Std. Deviation 1.636Variance 2.677
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q1
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.03
Std. Dev. = 1.636
N = 60
Histogram
The data collected from the employees of organizations regarding the amount of
work done is reasonable or not the response was as follows:20% of employees strongly disagree
26.7% of employees disagree
16.7% of employees say neutral
13.3% of employees agree
13.3% of employees strongly agree
I am satisfied with the priorities and direction of my department
56
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
57/68
Q2
Frequenc
y PercentValid
PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid Strongly
Disagree 6 10.0 10.0 10.0Disagree 18 30.0 30.0 40.0Neutral 6 10.0 10.0 50.0Agree 8 13.3 13.3 63.3StronglyAgree
14 23.3 23.3 86.7
N/A 8 13.3 13.3 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q2
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.50Std. Deviation 1.662Variance 2.763
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q2
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.5
Std. Dev. = 1.662
N = 60
Histogram
The response from the employees regarding the priorities and directions given
by the management the response was as follows:10% of employees strongly disagree
30% of employees disagree
10% of employees neutral
13.3% of employees agree
23.3% of employees strongly agree
57
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
58/68
I have adequate information available which enables me to do my job well.
Q3
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid StronglyDisagree
12 20.0 20.0 20.0
Disagree 14 23.3 23.3 43.3Neutral 12 20.0 20.0 63.3Agree 8 13.3 13.3 76.7StronglyAgree
8 13.3 13.3 90.0
N/A 6 10.0 10.0 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q3
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.07Std. Deviation 1.625Variance 2.640
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q3
0
3
6
9
12
15
Frequency
Mean = 3.07
Std. Dev. = 1.625
N = 60
Histogram
CIQ operate in a cost-efficient way in my department.
58
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
59/68
Q4
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid StronglyDisagree
8 13.3 13.3 13.3
Disagree 20 33.3 33.3 46.7Neutral 8 13.3 13.3 60.0Agree 10 16.7 16.7 76.7StronglyAgree
8 13.3 13.3 90.0
N/A 6 10.0 10.0 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q4
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.13Std. Deviation 1.578Variance 2.490
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q4
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.13
Std. Dev. = 1.578
N = 60
Histogram
I understand the day-to-day goals of my department
59
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
60/68
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
61/68
Q6
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid StronglyDisagree
6 10.0 10.0 10.0
Disagree 14 23.3 23.3 33.3Neutral 14 23.3 23.3 56.7Agree 12 20.0 20.0 76.7StronglyAgree
8 13.3 13.3 90.0
N/A 6 10.0 10.0 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q6
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.33Std. Deviation 1.481Variance 2.192
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q6
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.33
Std. Dev. = 1.481
N = 60
Histogram
61
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
62/68
Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your job?
Q7
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid StronglyDisagree
6 10.0 10.0 10.0
Disagree 18 30.0 30.0 40.0Neutral 10 16.7 16.7 56.7Agree 10 16.7 16.7 73.3StronglyAgree
10 16.7 16.7 90.0
N/A 6 10.0 10.0 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q7
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.30Std. Deviation 1.544Variance 2.383
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q7
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.3
Std. Dev. = 1.544
N = 60
Histogram
Q8
62
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
63/68
My work group has a climate in which diverse perspectives are valued
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid Strongly
Disagree 10 16.7 16.7 16.7Disagree 14 23.3 23.3 40.0Neutral 12 20.0 20.0 60.0Agree 8 13.3 13.3 73.3StronglyAgree
8 13.3 13.3 86.7
N/A 8 13.3 13.3 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q8
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.23Std. Deviation 1.661Variance 2.758
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q8
0
3
6
9
12
15
Frequency
Mean = 3.23
Std. Dev. = 1.661
N = 60
Histogram
COMPANY] policies and procedures make sense to me.
63
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
64/68
Q9
Frequen
cy PercentValid
PercentCumulative Percent
Valid StronglyDisagree
10 16.7 16.7 16.7
Disagree 16 26.7 26.7 43.3Neutral 10 16.7 16.7 60.0Agree 8 13.3 13.3 73.3StronglyAgree
8 13.3 13.3 86.7
N/A 8 13.3 13.3 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q9
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.20Std. Deviation 1.675Variance 2.807
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q9
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.2Std. Dev. = 1.675
N = 60
Histogram
64
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
65/68
The physical working conditions (e.g., ventilation, space, cleanliness) are very good.
Q10
Frequen
cy Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e PercentValid Strongly
Disagree10 16.7 16.7 16.7
Disagree 16 26.7 26.7 43.3Neutral 10 16.7 16.7 60.0Agree 8 13.3 13.3 73.3StronglyAgree
10 16.7 16.7 90.0
N/A 6 10.0 10.0 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Q10
N Valid 60Missing 0
Mean 3.17Std. Deviation 1.628Variance 2.650
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q10
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.17
Std. Dev. = 1.628
N = 60
Histogram
Individual differences are respected here (e.g., gender, race, educational background,etc.)
65
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
66/68
Frequency Percent
ValidPercent
Cumulative Percent
Valid StronglyDisagree
10 16.7 16.7 16.7
Disagree 16 26.7 26.7 43.3Neutral 10 16.7 16.7 60.0Agree 8 13.3 13.3 73.3StronglyAgree
8 13.3 13.3 86.7
N/A 8 13.3 13.3 100.0Total 60 100.0 100.0
StatisticsQ11
N Valid 60Missing 0Mean 3.20Std. Deviation 1.675Variance 2.807
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Q11
0
5
10
15
20
Frequency
Mean = 3.2
Std. Dev. = 1.675
N = 60
Histogram
66
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
67/68
Chapter 5
Appendix
67
7/28/2019 Susheel Mishra
68/68
Questionnaire
Amount of work I am expected to do on my job is reasonable
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
I am satisfied with the priorities and direction of my department
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
I have adequate information available which enables me to do my job well.
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
We operate in a cost-efficient way in my department
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
I understand the day-to-day goals of my department
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
Diverse perspectives are valued and encouraged within the department
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your job?
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
My work group has a climate in which diverse perspectives are valued
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
COMPANY] policies and procedures make sense to me.
Strongly Disagree ( ) Disagree ( ) Neutral ( ) Agree ( ) Strongly Agree ( ) N/A ( )
The physical working conditions (e.g., ventilation, space, cleanliness) are very good
Individual differences are respected here (e.g., gender, race, educational background,
Top Related