Statewide Transportation Management Center Statewide Transportation Management Center Software Library SystemSoftware Library System
Software Requirements Review (SRR)Software Requirements Review (SRR)and Status Meeting and Status Meeting
January 8, 2004January 8, 2004
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 2
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 3
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 4
Requirements ProcessRequirements Process
Organizing original requirements– All original STMCSLS requirements are converted into FEAT
(feature) requirements– Reorganized the structure of the requirements into subsystems– Retained traceability back to the STMCSLS requirement numbers– Updated status of requirements appropriately (Approved, FDOT,
and Future)
Created System Level Requirements– Created new category of requirements (SUB) for subsystems– Adds additional functional requirements for the various
subsystems– SUB requirements are structured in a hierarchical format– Each new SUB requirement has traceability to a FEAT requirement
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 5
SRS DevelopmentSRS Development
FDOT required the use of Rational RequisitePro in the ITN
Rational has a companion tool, SoDA, that is used to create document templates that are “fed” from other Rational tools (e.g. RequisitePro)
For cost savings, correctness, and maintenance issues, the SRS should be generated using SoDA
SwRI is using SoDA to develop the SRS.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 7
Requirements View - continuedRequirements View - continued
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 9
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:User LevelsUser Levels
Five user levels defined:– Administrator: can alter system
configuration– Manager: override equipment
locks, approval authority– Operator: performs daily
operations tasks– Local guest: CCTV control, view
status– Remote guest: device control
(via C2C), view status By definition, a user may only
belong to a single level
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 10
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:DMSDMS
Control a DMS:– Send a message– Terminate a message– Place a DMS online or offline– Set the brightness to Day, Night or Automatic adjusting– Reset the controller (software reset)– Synchronize the clock with the main process time
DMS status information– Poll for current status information– Echo the message displayed– Fan, pixel or lamp status detail
Save messages for sending to DMSs
Automatic polling of devices for status in a configurable time interval
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 11
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:CCTVCCTV
Camera control:
– PTZ
– Iris
– Focus
Switch control:
– Switch input to output
Video tours:
– Define tours
– Invoke tours
User "locks" a camera before control functions are issued
Note: Video wall configuration is NOT to be supported by the STMCSLS
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 12
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:Traffic DataTraffic Data
Traffic detection intervals may be specified in the following range (10s - 60m)
Detectors may be mapped to links and lanes
Highways may be defined to contain links
Alarm thresholds may be specified for speed, volume and occupancy
If the user subscribes, link updates will be received at the specified interval.
If the user subscribes, alarm events will be received.
Sensor data may include raw values or a smoothed average value.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 13
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:GUIGUI
Day to day operator functions will be combined into one primary operator interface, using a browser-based application.
The operator interface will be centered around a fully navigable (pan, scale, zoom, etc.) map which will be available in the background at all times.
Icons representing equipment, incidents, and other appropriate objects will be placed on the map according to GIS coordinates, along with major and minor roadways.
Roadway segments which are instrumented for speed data collection will be colored according to the current speed of that roadway segment.
All functions regarding real time incident information, equipment status and control, etc. will be accessible through the operator interface.
Other functions, such as equipment configuration, user permissions, and system configuration will be accessible through a secondary browser-based interface more suited to configuration.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 14
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:Incident ManagementIncident Management
Incidents or congestion will be automatically generated based on a user defined threshold for speed, volume or occupancy (see Traffic)
Incidents may be manually entered by a user.
A response plan may be generated based on incident location.
A response plan may consist of equipment to be activated or resource personnel to be directed to the incident.
Data collected for an incident should include:– Incident type– Location– Weather conditions– Duration– Traffic conditions (congestion, etc)
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 15
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:LoggingLogging
Log device changes:– DMS message change– Camera control acquisition– HAR message change
Log user actions:– Add/modify/delete equipment/messages/data– Changes to user permissions– Modifications to system default values
Log system errors:– Network connectivity lost– Loss of process communication– Database access errors
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 16
High-Level Review:High-Level Review:ReportsReports
Device status by filter– Devices of type X that are online– Devices of type X that are offline– Devices of type X that are in communication failure– Devices of type X that have an active display (e.g., message)
Device history (e.g., messages displayed on a DMS during a time span)
Incidents by status– Open– Verified– Cleared– Closed
User actions per time frame filtered by users?
Congestion history
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 17
Total RequirementsTotal Requirements
System FDOT SwRI Added
General 81
Web server 4Executive Handler (EH) 12 6
Inventory Management System (IMS) 17Incident Management (IM) 34 1Data Distribution (DD) 3 6GUI 7 7CCTV 30 11DMS 7 20TSS 11 5
Evacuation Coordination (EC) 39
RWIS 10C2C 3 17
Data Archiving (DA) 5
HAR 11
Status Logging (SL) 9
USER 3
Total Requirements 263 96
Future Requirements 43
FDOT to Address 23
SwRI to Address 197 96
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 18
Requirements StatusRequirements Status
Completed Requirements – DMS – CCTV – HAR – Data Distribution – IM (Incident Management)– EH (Executive Handler)– SL (Status Logger)– TSS (Traffic Sensor Subsystem) – C2C (Center-to-Center)– GUI (Graphical User Interface)
Will be updated during Release 2a design activities:– IMS (Inventory and Maintenance)– RWIS (Weather)– DA (Data Archiving)– EC (Emergency Coordination)
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 19
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 20
Requirements to DiscussRequirements to Discuss
The following “groups” of requirements needs to be discussed (SwRI needs closure on the issues associated with these requirements):
– Non-testable requirements
– Reworded requirements
– Requirements assigned to FDOT (from SwRI) because SwRI control
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 21
Requirements to Discuss:Requirements to Discuss:Non-testableNon-testable
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 22
Requirements to Discuss:Requirements to Discuss:Non-testable - continuedNon-testable - continued
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 23
Requirements to Discuss:Requirements to Discuss:RewordedReworded
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 24
Requirements to Discuss:Requirements to Discuss:Assigned to FDOTAssigned to FDOT
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 25
Requirements to Discuss:Requirements to Discuss:Assigned to FDOT - continuedAssigned to FDOT - continued
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 26
Requirements to Discuss:Requirements to Discuss:Assigned to FDOT - continuedAssigned to FDOT - continued
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 27
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 28
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 29
Issues Identified During Small Issues Identified During Small Group Requirements MeetingsGroup Requirements Meetings
User levels:
– Validate users against Windows domain credentials. SwRI response:
• During initial logon to the STMCSLS environment users will be validated against domain credentials.
• After initial logon, application security model will be used
– Allow operators to perform “DMS Conflict Resolution”. SwRI response:
• Need FDOT resolution
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 30
Issues Identified During Small Group Issues Identified During Small Group Requirements Meetings – con’tRequirements Meetings – con’t
DMS:– Operators should be restricted to only displaying messages
from the DMS message library. SwRI response:• A restriction for a predefined message means that the DMS
Subsystem would have to search through all messages in the database when a send message is received to ensure the message was in the database.
• Need FDOT resolution
CCTV:– Require CCTV control from either mouse or arrow keys. Use
“scroll wheel” for zooming. SwRI response:• Investigating if browser can support requests
– Browser based CCTV PTZ performance may not be acceptable. SwRI response:
• Extensive testing in the SwRI labs, demo to be provided during SRR.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 31
Issues Identified During Small Group Issues Identified During Small Group Requirements Meetings – con’tRequirements Meetings – con’t
CCTV:– On CCTV control, option to use either analog
speed control or fixed speed control. SwRI response:
• SwRI investigating providing both capabilities• Need FDOT resolution
Incident:– Need to be able to change incident location. SwRI
response:• Incidents are tied to a spatial location when they
are created, allowing the position to be altered could be problematic – need FDOT resolution.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 32
Issues Identified During Small Group Issues Identified During Small Group Requirements Meetings – con’tRequirements Meetings – con’t
GUI:– Prefer a “fixed frame” for control panel functions. SwRI
response:• GUI will be developed with the “controls” locked into
the GUI
– Adhere to 508 ADA GUI requirements when possible. SwRI response:
• Will implement as feasible
Reporting:– Review FIDS reports. SwRI response:
• Development of reports is quite limited in the STMCSLS.
• SwRI needs FDOT to provide sample reports
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 33
Issues Identified During Small Group Issues Identified During Small Group Requirements Meetings – con’tRequirements Meetings – con’t
General:
– Device support: what devices will be supported? SwRI response:
• Working with FDOT on adding additional device drivers
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 34
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 36
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 37
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 38
CCTV GUI DemonstrationCCTV GUI Demonstration
Purpose:– Show “speed” of GUI to
camera commands– Evaluate latency issues
with MPEG-2 video encoding/decoding
Features:– Analog controls– Pan / tilt concurrently
Limitations:– Currently only supports
Pelco protocol
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 39
CCTV GUI Demonstration CCTV GUI Demonstration Software SetupSoftware Setup
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 40
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 42
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 43
Project Web SiteProject Web Site
http://stmcsls.datasys.swri.edu
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 44
Proposed STMCSLS Proposed STMCSLS ArchitectureArchitecture
Robust
Extensible
Flexible
Scalable
Configurable
Proven
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 45
Release-Oriented Release-Oriented Development ApproachDevelopment Approach
Release 1 Release 2a Release 2b not in scope
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 46
““Generic Subsystem” DesignGeneric Subsystem” Design
Based on the TransGuide implementation concept
A generic C# subsystem has been developed:– Used by all “ported”
TransGuide subsystems– Used in the future for
new subsystems
Each subsystem instantiates the generic subsystem
Maximizes “common” implementation approach
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 47
Scope of STMCSLS EffortScope of STMCSLS Effort
Release 1:– Core software framework:
• Database• Process viewer• Status logger• User interface• Map
– DMS subsystem, drivers for:• NTCIP Florida MIB• Mark IV version 2.5
– CCTV subsystem, drivers for:• NTCIP camera support• American Dynamics 2050 switch
– Traffic Detection, driver for:• Bitrans 238I-95
– Incident management subsystem
Release 2a:
– Core software framework upgrade
– Center-to-Center
– FDOT Central office configuration
– Ramp metering
– CCTV subsystem, drivers:
• SunGuide protocol
– RWIS
– Archive data
– HAR
– Web server
– Emergency evacuation
Release 2b:
– Inventory and maintenance
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 48
Status of Release 1 ActivitiesStatus of Release 1 Activities
Project Management:– PM / Meetings / Reviews– Process documents– Interface Control Documents (ICDs)
Core software framework:– Database– Process viewer– Status logger– User interface– Map
DMS subsystem, drivers for:– NTCIP Florida MIB– Mark IV version 2.5
CCTV subsystem, drivers for:– NTCIP camera support– American Dynamics 2050 switch
Traffic Detection, driver for:– Bitrans 238I-95
Incident management subsystem
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 49
Deliverable StatusDeliverable Status
Documents– Delivered:
• 25 (23 early, 2 late)
– Pending:• Waiting for FDOT comments: 3 documents• Concept of Operations (waiting on final SRR input)• Software Security Plan (in review)• Two complete but not delivered (waiting for Oracle
licenses from FDOT)
Status reports: 3 delivered (none pending)
All available on project web site.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 50
Cost StatusCost Status
Release 1:
– Budget amount: $3,208,052
– As of 1/2/04, ~$452,000 has been expended
Release 2a:
– Budget amount: $2,074,276
– As of 1/2/04, $0 has been expended
Release 2b:
– Budget amount: $245,311
– As of 1/2/04, $0 has been expended
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 51
Schedule StatusSchedule Status
Current schedule is posted to project web site Overall project status:
– Ahead in many places– Beginnings of STMCSLS operational in the lab, primarily:
• Support processes (executive, logging)• Data Bus• DMS• Online soon in preliminary form: CCTV and TSS
(Transportation Sensor Subsystem) Current areas of concern:
– Lack of Oracle licenses could impact schedule– Documents:
• Concept of Operations• Security Plan
– Lack of final device drivers
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 52
Schedule Status - continuedSchedule Status - continued
SwRI would encourage a project status meeting during ITS America (April 26 – 28 in San Antonio)
SwRI would recommend April 29th
Agenda:– Project status– See STMCSLS operating in a multi-server, multi-
workstation environment– Meet the development team
Note: ITS Central Office will email all committee members about their plans in attending ITSA 2004
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 59
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 60
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 61
STMCSLS and Device DriversSTMCSLS and Device Drivers
Device functionality isolated by “ICDs” (Interface Control Documents)
Subsystems are “generic” and not specific to device functionality
Device drivers easy to add once base subsystem is complete and operational
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 62
Device Drivers In BAFO That Were Device Drivers In BAFO That Were Approved For ImplementationApproved For Implementation
DMS:
– NTCIP
– Mark IV (v 2.5)
CCTV (Cameras):
– NTCIP
– SunGuide
Video Switch:
– American Dynamics 2050
Traffic Detectors:– BiTrans 238I-95
Ramp Metering:– WsDOT
RWIS:– NTCIP
HAR
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 63
Device Drivers In BAFO That Were Device Drivers In BAFO That Were NOT Approved For ImplementationNOT Approved For Implementation
DMS:– Dambach– Vultron– Telespot
Video Switch:– Javelin– Cornet
CCTV:
– Pelco
– Vicon
– Hitachi
– Diamond
– Sanyo
Detection:
– Trafficon
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 64
SwRI Asked To Evaluate the SwRI Asked To Evaluate the Following IssuesFollowing Issues
IP Addressable devices:– The STMCSLS device drivers utilize TCP/IP
communications to communicate to terminal servers in the field
– The terminal server converts from TCP/IP to RS-232– The STMCSLS device drivers should be capable of
communicating directly to a IP addressable device, BUT, FDOT should provide a test device for SwRI to evaluate
Statewide IP address system coordination– SwRI is not sure of what actions need to be taken
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 65
SwRI Asked To Evaluate Adding SwRI Asked To Evaluate Adding New Devices to STMCSLS EffortNew Devices to STMCSLS Effort
Micro loop
RTMS
360 Surveillance
Streaming (IP) Video
Intelligent Devices
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 66
TSS Subsystem and DriversTSS Subsystem and Drivers
Transportation Sensor Subsystem (TSS) acquires vehicle information
Wide variety of detection devices available
Loops (or devices that emulate loops) are the most common
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 67
Micro LoopsMicro Loops
Assumptions:– Will use a Canoga micro loop controller from 3M
Scope of work:– A device driver compliant with the STMCSLS
TSS device driver Interface Control Document (ICD) interface shall be developed
– Efforts will include:• Design• Peer Review• Implementation• Testing• Integration with the TSS subsystem
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 68
RTMS DeviceRTMS Device
Assumptions:– A device driver for a Wavetronix SmartSensor device
will be developed.– The TCP/IP interface from the device will be used to
retrieve data Scope of work:
– A device driver compliant with the STMCSLS TSS device driver Interface Control Document (ICD) interface shall be developed
– Efforts will include:• Design• Peer Review• Implementation• Testing• Integration with the TSS subsystem
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 69
STMCSLS and 360 SurveillanceSTMCSLS and 360 Surveillance
SwRI recommendation:– Support:
• STMCSLS• 360 Surveillance
– Provides common GUI– Supports C2C software
concept– Does not “force” a
vendor solution to all Districts
Issues:– Software ownership– Device support (drivers
still needed)
Two video solutions can coexist with STMCSLS
architecture
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 70
Interfacing STMCSLS to the 360 Interfacing STMCSLS to the 360 Surveillance Cameleon SoftwareSurveillance Cameleon Software
360 Surveillance plans for an API to be developed in 1st Quarter 2004 (per salesperson)
STMCSLS could access this API to connect the 360 Surveillance software to the STMCSLS video subsystem (using the existing ICD)
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 71
360 Surveillance360 Surveillance
Assumptions:– 360 Surveillance will develop an API to access their control software,
SwRI will need to be able to review the API to assure it meets the STMCSLS needs
– FDOT will provide SwRI with a copy of the 360 Surveillance Cameleon software
– FDOT will provide appropriate test hardware to SwRI (for use in testing in the SwRI labs) within 2 months of starting the work.
Scope of work:– A device driver compliant with the STMCSLS CCTV video switch
Interface Control Document (ICD) and the camera device ICD interface shall be developed
– Efforts will include:• Design• Peer Review• Implementation• Testing• Integration with the CCTV subsystem
Note:– The functionality of the interface may be limited based on the
capabilities of the API provided by 360 Surveillance
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 72
Streaming IP VideoStreaming IP Video
IP video is the current direction for many ITS applications
Synopsis of technology:– Video is “encoded” (typically into MPEG-2) at the
source– Encoded video transmitted via TCP/IP multicast– Network hardware must support multicast
transmittal (hardware > 3 years may be problematic)
– Video is “decoded” where it is to be displayed– In THEORY: encoders/decoders should be inter-
operable (and some vendors are)
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 73
Streaming (IP) VideoStreaming (IP) Video
Assumptions:– SwRI will procure (augment) the following IP video hardware (on SwRI funds):
• VBrick• CoreTec• Teleste
Scope of work:– A device driver compliant with the STMCSLS CCTV video switch ICD– Efforts will include:
• Design• Peer Review• Implementation• Testing• Integration with the CCTV subsystem
Issues:– Network topology (e.g. network switches) may not all support the exchange of
IP based video, the Streaming Video task does not include any time for network design or evaluation – it is assumed that the network will support the exchange of IP based video.
– The Streaming IP Video effort only controls the switching of video, specific camera drivers must still be developed to control the positioning of camera devices.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 74
Using IDI DevicesUsing IDI Devices
Exposes NTCIP functionality for any device (per IDI)
Loop through capability facilitates deployment and “cut over”
Augment device functionality (e.g. FDOT MIB)
STMCSLS NTCIP Interfaces:– CCTV (funded)– DMS (funded)– TSS (not funded)
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 75
Intelligent DevicesIntelligent Devices
Assumptions:– FDOT will procure all devices– All NTCIP compliance testing to be performed by FDOT
(TERL)– No software development effort by SwRI
Scope of work:– Work with FDOT staff to identify candidate devices– Observe NTCIP testing with FDOT staff– Once devices accepted by FDOT, perform integration
testing with STMCSLS software framework
ITS Central Office Note: Funding source of Intelligent Device procurement may come from STMCSLS Project budget allocated to the specific device driver replaced by Intelligent Device hardware.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 76
Device Driver CostsDevice Driver Costs
SwRI was asked to evaluate the current device driver costs
Current device drivers were included in the BAFO approved by FDOT
New drivers can be added:
– SwRI based cost estimates on some assumptions (see previous slides)
– SwRI has developed cost estimates
– Schedule impact may vary based on timing and number of new drivers added
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 77
Device Driver Costs - continuedDevice Driver Costs - continued
Currently funded:– NTCIP CCTV Driver: $131,618 (spent ~$17,037 to date)– BiTrans TSS Driver: $99,480 (spent ~$2,222 to date)– AD 2050 Video Switch: $70,167 (spent ~$1,135 to date)– SunGuide CCTV Driver: $87,348 (spent $0 to date)– Mark IV DMS Driver: $52,504 (spent ~$14,160 to date)– NTCIP DMS Driver: $52,210 (spent ~$35,711 to date)
New potential device drivers (assume start on 2/1/04):– Microloop: $129,074, 4 months– RTMS: $103,684, 4 months– 360 Surveillance: $135,224, 8 months– Streaming (IP) Video: $97,260, 4 months– Intelligent Devices: $89,910, 18 months
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 78
Device Driver Costs – Device Driver Costs – SwRI Needs DirectionSwRI Needs Direction
Current drivers:– Continue on with current activities?– FDOT would need to initiate a contract modification
to delete the work
New drivers:– Cost and schedule has been determined by SwRI– FDOT would need to initiate a contract modification
to add the work– Any additions would need to be done soon to make
Release 1
No contract modifications implies that the device drivers included in the BAFO estimate will be delivered.
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 79
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 80
Open Discussion on MDX and Lee County Participation – What Devices Need To Be
Supported?
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 81
AgendaAgenda
8:30 – 8:35 Introductions All
8:35 – 9:30 High-Level Requirements Summary Dellenback / Randolph
9:30 – 10:00 Requirements to Discuss Dellenback / Randolph
10:00 – 10:15 Break
10:15 – 10:45 Issues from Small Group Meetings Dellenback / Randolph
10:45 – 12:00 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments All
12:00 – 1:15 Lunch
1:15 – 1:30 GUI / CCTV Demonstration Dellenback / Randolph
1:30 – 2:15 Open Requirements Discussion / Comments – Con’t All
2:15 – 3:00 STMCSLS Status Report Dellenback
3:00 – 3:15 Break
3:15 – 4:00 Impact of adding New Devices Dellenback
4:00 – 4:20 Open Discussion: MDX and Lee County All
4:20 – 4:30 Action Item Summary Dellenback
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 82
Action Item RecapAction Item Recap
Number Person Action
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
January 8, 2004STMCSLS Status Meeting and SRR 83
STMCSLS Project Team Contact STMCSLS Project Team Contact InformationInformation
Southwest Research InstituteP.O. Drawer 28510
San Antonio, Texas 78228
PB Farradyne3206 Tower Oaks BoulevardRockville, Maryland 20852
Steve [email protected]
(210) 522-3914
Robert [email protected](210) 522-3814
Charlie [email protected]
(352) 374-6635
John [email protected]
(301) 816-1852
Top Related