8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
1/59
Stateline Solar Farm
Ivanpah Valley, California
Groundwater Availability
Prepared for
First Solar, Inc.
March 2011
367-00-11-05
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
2/59
Table
March 2011n\client\367-0
Chapter
Chap
1
11
Chapter
Chap
2
2
2
Chapter
Chap
3
3
Chapter
Chap
4
4
4
4
Chapter
Chap
Chapter
Chap
Chapter
Chap
f Conte
0-11-05\wp\03111
1 Introduc
er 1 ............
Proposed.1
Descriptio.2Significant.3
1.3.1 Hew
1.3.2 Glan
1.3.3 TRC
1.3.4 ENS
1.3.5 Don
2 Descript
er 2 ............
Consolidat.1
Unconsoli.2
Structural.3
3 Descript
er 3 ............
Flow and.1
Water Qua.2
4 Quantifi
er 4 ............
Definition.1
Groundwa.2
4.2.1 Pum4.2.2 Und
Groundwa.3
4.3.1 Prec
4.3.2 Wat
Groundwa.4
5 Ground
er 5 ............
6 Conclus
er 6 ............
7 Referen
er 7 ............
ts
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
tion
.....................
tateline Sol
of Study ArPrevious Wo
ett Report .....
cy Report .....
Report ........
R Corporatio
van-Katzer
ion of Hyd
.....................
ed Rocks .....
ated Deposi
eatures.......
ion of Hyd
.....................
echarge ......
lity ...............
ation of G
.....................
f Groundwat
er Outflows .
ping .............rflows ..........
er Inflows ....
ipitation Rec
r-Use Retur
er-Storage C
ater Avail
.....................
ion
.....................
ces Cited
.....................
vail Repornt
.....................
r Farm .........
a .................rk .................
.....................
.....................
.....................
n Report .......
eport ...........
ogeologic
.....................
.....................
s ..................
.....................
ologic Sett
.....................
.....................
.....................
oundwate
.....................
er Budget .....
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
arge ............
s ..................
hanges ........
bility for P
.....................
.....................
.....................
i
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
etting
....................
....................
....................
....................
ing
....................
....................
....................
Budget
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
roposed P
....................
....................
....................
Stateli
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
wer Plant
.....................
.....................
.....................
ne Solar Farm
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
First S
roundwater Ava
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
lar Inc.
ilability
.... 1-1
.... 1-1
.... 1-1.... 1-2
.... 1-2
.... 1-2
.... 1-3
.... 1-3
.... 1-4
.... 2-1
.... 2-1
.... 2-1
.... 2-2
.... 3-1
.... 3-1
.... 3-4
.... 4-1
.... 4-1
.... 4-1
.... 4-1.... 4-3
.... 4-3
.... 4-3
.... 4-6
.... 4-7
.... 5-1
.... 6-1
.... 7-1
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
3/59
Table o
March 2011n\client\367-0
List of T
Table
Table
TableTable
Table
Table
Table
Table
List of F
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
FigurFigur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Figur
Contents
0-11-05\wp\03111
ables
3-1. Measur
3-2. Measur
3-3. Well Co4.1. Ground
Valleys
4-2. CompaDonov
4.3. Ground
5.1. Parame
5.2. Ground
igures
1.1 Locatio
1.2 Physio
1.3 Compa
1.4 Compa
2.1 Hydrog
2.2 Hydrog
3.1. Pre-De
3.2. Curren
3.3. Locatio
3.4. Sectio
3.5. TDS in
3.6. Groun
4.1a. Cumu
4.1b. Cumu
4.2a. Cumu
4.2b. Cumu
4.3a. Cumu4.3b. Cumu
4.4. Compa
4.5. Compaand Do
4-6. GraphTRC,
4.7. LAND
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
ed Groundw
ed Groundw
nstruction, Uater Pumpi
, 1999 - 2005
ison of Waten and Katze
ater Budget
ter Values U
ater Budget
of Ivanpah
raphic and C
ison of Dono
ison of Dono
ology of Iva
ologic Secti
velopment G
t (2008) Grou
ns of Princip
Displaying
Wells ...........
water Qualit
lative Distrib
lative Distrib
lative Distrib
lative Distrib
lative Distriblative Distrib
rison of Bou
rison of Precnovan and K
Showing CoNSR Corp.
AT False-Co
vail Repornt
ter Levels fo
ter Elevation
sage and Grg and Water....................
rshed Acrea, and This St
for Ivanpah
ed to Calcul
for Ivanpah
alley ...........
ultural Featu
van-Katzer a
van-Kater an
pah Valley ..
n Through I
roundwater
ndwater Lev
l Production
DS in Wells .
.....................
Trends .......
tion of Topo
tion of Topo
tion of Annu
tion of Annu
tion of Annution of Annu
daries Used
ipitation-Altittzer .............
parison of Rnd Donovan
lor Infrared I
ii
r Pre-Develo
s, in feet, for
undwater Q-Use Returns....................
es Used byudy ..............
alley, 1999-
te Drawdow
alley, 1999-
................... .
res of Ivanpa
nd Glancy Pr
d Glancy Re
....................
anpah Valle
evels ...........
ls................
Wells ..........
....................
....................
....................
graphic Altitu
graphic Altitu
al Precipitati
al Precipitati
al Rechargeal Recharge
by Glancy, T
de Relations....................
echarge-Preand Katzer .
age for Iva
Stateli
pment Condi
Current (200
ality, Primmwithin Ivanp
.....................
Glancy, TRC.....................
2008 ............
ns ................
2008 ............
.....................
h Valley .......
ecipitation-Al
harge-Preci
.....................
...................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
de for North I
de for South
n for North I
n for South I
for North Ivafor South Iva
RC, ENSR,
Used by Gl.....................
cipitation Rel.....................
pah Valley,
ne Solar Farm
ions .............
8) Condition
Valley Golfah and Jean.....................
, ENSR Corp.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
ltitude Relati
itation Relat
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Error! Book
.....................
.....................
.....................
Ivanpah Vall
Ivanpah Vall
anpah Valle
vanpah Valle
pah Valley ..npah Valley ..
nd This Stud
ncy, TRC, E.....................
ations Used.....................
ummer 201
First S
roundwater Ava
....................
...................
lub ..............Lake....................
oration,....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
ns ...............
ions .............
....................
....................
....................
....................
mark not de
....................
....................
....................
y .................
y.................
y ..................
y..................
....................
....................
y .................
NSR Corp.....................
y Glancy,....................
...................
lar Inc.
ilability
.... 3-2
.... 3-3
.... 3-5
.... 4-2
.... 4-5
.... 4-8
.... 5-3
.... 5-4
.... 1-6
.... 1-7
.... 1-8
.... 1-9
.... 2-3
.... 2-4
.... 3-7
.... 3-8ined.
.... 3-9
.. 3-10
.. 3-11
.... 4-9
.. 4-10
.. 4-11
.. 4-12
.. 4-13
.. 4-14
.. 4-15
.. 4-16
.. 4-17
.. 4-18
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
4/59
Table o
March 2011n\client\367-0
Figur
Figur
Figur
Contents
0-11-05\wp\03111
4.8. ChangConditi
5.1. Locatio
5.2. Groun
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
in Groundwon (1953-20
ns of Propos
water Level
vail Repornt
ater Levels f8) ................
ed Stateline
eclines Due
iii
om Pre-Dev....................
olar Farm
to Stateline
Stateli
lopment Co.....................
ells ..............
Solar Farm P
ne Solar Farm
dition to Cur.....................
.....................
umping ........
First S
roundwater Ava
rent....................
....................
....................
lar Inc.
ilability
.. 4-19
.... 5-5
.... 5-6
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
5/59
March 2011n\client\367-0
CHAP
Introd
PRO1.1
First So
Valley,facility,Farm). S
generati
to theSubstati
domestic
construc
of groun
DES1.2
Ivanpah
adjacent
border (560,000
includin
south Iv
as north
Ivanpahon eithe
physiogr
Lucy GrMountai
and Sha
about 7,
The Jean
Valley. Ithe Jean
the Sheeto 6,900
Severalsecond
(Ivanpah
communsmall ca
Californi
complex.includes
border
Californi
0-11-05\wp\03111
TER 1
ction
POSED ST
ar, Inc. pr
alifornia.nd is knowtateline Sol
n interconn
outhern Cn. After the
purposes.
ion of the S
water with
RIPTION
Valley is p
Jean Lake
igures 1.1acres, incl
Jean Lake
npah Valle
vanpah Val
alley is a tr the Ivan
aphic featu
ey Range,Range, Iv
ow Valley
00 ft within
Lake Valle
t is a topogLake playa.
Mountainft within th
ommunitieowerplant,
SEGS) is s
ities are Jeainos, a corr
a-Nevada
A golf coan open-pit
f Ivanpah
a on the w
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
TELINE S
poses to c
he projectn as the Dear Farm wi
ection trans
alifornia Econstructio
Approxima
tateline Sol
n Ivanpah
F STUDY
art of a lar
alley (Gla
and 1.2), abding 340,0
Valley. The
. The Nev
ley. These d
opographicah Lake
e bordered
nd New Ynpah Mou
n the west.
the eastern
y is located
raphically cJean Lake
on the weeastern mo
, an activethe Brigh
cheduled to
n and Primectional fac
order, and
rse is locamine and
Valley. Th
stern borde
vail Repornt
LAR FAR
onstruct a
consists ofsert Statelinll include t
ission line
ison (SCEn of the fac
ely 1,900
r Farm. Th
alley to sat
REA
ger hydrolo
cy, 1968).
out 40 mile0 acres wi
California
da part of I
esignations
lly closed br Roach
by the Bird
rk Mountaitains and b
Topographi
mountains
completely
losed basinalley is bo
t. Topograpntains and
mine, andSource En
be built wi
. Jean is lolity, and a
consists
ed near Priilling facil
Colosseu
of Ivanpa
1-1
00-megaw
an alternatie LLC State generati
, and an ac
) regionallity, the onl
cre-feet of
purpose o
sfy that wat
gic system
Ivanpah Va
s southwestthin Califo
art of Ivan
vanpah Val
are the sam
asin withinake playas
Spring Ra
ns on the ea low top
c altitudes r
nd 8,500 ft
within Nev
within whidered by th
hic altitude4,300 ft wit
a powerplaergy Ivanp
hin Ivanpa
cated withimall numb
ostly of s
mm withinty, is locat
Mine, a
Valley. Th
Stateli
tt solar po
g current sline Solarg facility,
ess road. T
transmissioy water use
water will
this report
er demand.
that includ
lley is locat
of Las Venia and 22
ah Valley
ley and Jea
e as used by
which surfa. The basi
ge on the
ast and bygraphic di
ange from a
within the
ada along t
h surface-e McCullo
s range froin the west
t are locatah Solar
Valley in t
Nevada, ar of reside
veral smal
California.d within C
undergrou
e Reliant B
ne Solar Farm
wer projec
olar photovarm facilitn-site subs
he system
n grid viad on the pre
be used d
is to describ
es both Iva
ed on the C
as. The val0,000 acres
is referred t
Lake Vall
ENSR Cor
ce-water drn is a no
north, the S
he Springide betwee
bout 2,600
estern mou
e eastern b
ater drainagh Range o
about 2,8ern mountai
d within Ivlectric Ge
he near fut
d consistsces. Primm
l casinos a
The Molyclifornia on
nd mine, i
ighorn pow
First S
roundwater Ava
within Iv
oltaic gene(Stateline
ation, a 22
ill be conn
SCEs Ivmises will
uring the 4
e the availa
pah Valle
alifornia-N
ley coverswithin Ne
in this rep
y are refer
oration (20
inage evapthward tre
heep Moun
ountains,Ivanpah
t on the pla
tains.
arder of Iv
ge evaporatn the east a
0 ft on thens.
anpah Vallterating S
re. The pri
ostly of sis located o
nd a resid
orp mine,the southw
s located
rplant is lo
lar Inc.
ilability
npah
atingSolar0 kV
ected
npahe for
-year
bility
and
vada
aboutvada,
ort as
ed to
07).
ratesding
tains,
Clarkalley
as to
npah
es ond by
playa
y. Astem
cipal
veraln the
ential
hichstern
ithin
cated
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
6/59
ChapIntrodu
March 2011n\client\367-0
in Neva
Ivanpah
Stateline
SIG1.3
IvanpahFremont,
Californi
Glancy,1996; Ha
House,
respectreconnai
ENSR C
1.3.1 He
In theQuadran
within I
the geol
1.3.2 Gl
In the Ne
Valley
Ivanpah
As part
Ivanpahfor south
time of t
dischargwithin Je
Table 11
1951; Av
empirical
by Hardresulting
20 inchegroundw
recharge
er 1ction
0-11-05\wp\03111
a near Pri
SEGS will
Solar Farm
IFICANT P
alley has1845; Wa
a Departme
1968; Califrrill and Pru
006; ENS
o this repsance by G
rporation (
ett Repor
. S. Geolgle, Califor
anpah Vall
gic setting.
ncy Repor
vada Divisi
rea, Nevad
alley, Jean
f his appra
alley (exclIvanpah V
he investiga
d as groundan Lake Val
. The recha
on and Dur
relation. Gl
an (1965)geographic
s on the moter recharg
increases wi
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
m. The m
be locate
location.
REVIOUS
een the subing, 1920;
t of Water
rnia Departdic, 1998; T
Corporatio
rt are theancy (1968)
007), and a
gical Survia and Nev
y and adja
n of Water
a and Calif
Lake Valley
isal, he esti
ding Jean Llley (Glanc
ion, Glancy
water underley discharg
rge estimate
in, 1994), w
ancy (1968)
o characteriange of ave
untain peakbased on
th increasing
vail Repornt
ine was fo
within C
ORK
ect of numHewett, 19
Resources,
ent of WaRC, 2000;
n, 2007).
geologic c, groundwat
groundwate
ey report ada, Hewe
ent areas.
esources re
ornia, Gla
, and adjace
ated avera
ake Valley),, 1968, Tab
(1968, Tab
flow into Ld as ground
s were deriv
hich translat
used a Nev
e precipitatage annual
. The Hardhe assumpti
average an
1-2
merly activ
lifornia, w
rous geolog6; Califor
1964; Sout
er Resourconovan and
owever, th
haracterizater models d
-recharge a
Geology att (1956) d
is work re
port Water
cy (1968)
t areas.
e groundw
100 acre-ft/le 14). Beca
le 11) concl
s Vegas Vawater under
ed using the
es precipitat
ada-wide m
on within Iprecipitation
man precipion that the
ual precipit
Stateli
e but is cu
est-southw
ic and hydria Departm
hern Califo
s, 1972; ThKatzer, 20
e most sig
ion by Heveloped res
alysis by D
d Mineralscribes the
ains the b
Resources
describes th
ter recharg
r for Jeanuse only mi
uded the re
lley. Likewilow into La
Maxey-Ea
ion into gro
p average a
anpah Vallwas from 3
tation was tpercentage
tion (Glanc
ne Solar Farm
rrently clos
st of the
ologic invesent of Publ
nia Edison
e Mark Gro0; ENSR In
ificant prev
ett (1956)pectively b
onovan and
Resourcesgeologic u
sic referenc
ppraisal of
e groundwa
s of 700 a
ake Valley,nor water u
harge withi
se, he conclVegas Vall
in method (
ndwater rec
nnual preci
y and Jeaninches on t
ranslated intof precipitat
, 1968, Tab
First S
roundwater Ava
ed. The pl
urrent pro
igations (suic Works,
Company,
up, 1988; Pternational,
ious works
, a groundTRC (200
Katzer (200
of the Ivits and str
e with resp
esquite-Iv
ter resourc
re-ft/yr for
and 800 acre occurred
n Ivanpah
ded the recey (Glancy,
Eakin and o
arge based
itation deve
Lake Valleye valley flo
o average aion that bec
e 8).
lar Inc.
ilability
nned
osed
ch as1956;
1964;
lume,003;
with
water) and
0).
npahcture
ct to
npah
s for
north
-ft/yrat the
alley
harge1968,
thers,
on an
loped
. Theors to
nnualomes
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
7/59
ChapIntrodu
March 2011n\client\367-0
Glancy (
for nort
Valley (and 287,
Ivanpah
1.3.3 TR
In the re
a groundto evalu
Ivanpah
estimatemodified
Glancy (
altitudeover the
percenta
TRC ass
13.5 incpercent
within eon an an
The gro
report. T
1995-19wastewa
casinos a
1.3.4 EN
In the re
IvanpahCorporat
Ivanpah
Board to1-1). Th
this periValley),
CorporatCorporat
they use
relation
er 1ction
0-11-05\wp\03111
1968, Tabl
and south
lancy, 196400 for so
alley, whi
C Report
ort Regio
water modete the pote
Lake playa
the acreaMaxey-Ea
1968, Table
ange 5,000-altitude r
e of precip
umed the a
es over theor the resp
ch altitudelysis of Fig
ndwater pu
he pumping
9 was 2,1er-disposal
nd golf cou
SR Corpor
ort Molyc
Valley, Sion (2007)
Valley. Th
facilitate grmodel rep
d was esti119 acre-ft/
ion, 2007,ion used the
d a precipi
rom Donov
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
8) tabulate
Ivanpah V
8, Plate 1).th Ivanpah
h only is ab
al Ground
l of south Ivtial future
. The mode
e groundwin method.
8) report.
6,000 ft, 13ange 7,000
itation was
verage prec
altitude ranctive altitu
range, the oure 1-1 in t
mping with
for 1953-1
00 acre-ft/facilities is
se are not li
tion Repo
rp Supple
n Bernardidescribes a
model wa
oundwateresents the 5
ated to ber for Jean L
able 7-2),same altitu
ation-altitud
n and Katze
vail Repornt
s the acrea
lley, but h
The tabulatValley. T
out 1 perce
ater Mode
anpah Vallimpacts of
l represents
ter rechargThe modif
lancy assu
.5 inches ov8,000 ft.
, 7, and 15
ipitation wa
e 6,000-8,0e ranges.
verall areaeir report.
in south Iv
999 is tabul
r. Recharglisted as 3
sted in the
t
ental Envir
o County,second gr
developed
anagement3-year peri
752 acre-fake Valley,
based one zones an
e relation
r (2000).
1-3
es used in
delineates
d areas aree map deli
t larger tha
l, Ivanpah
y. The modformer was
the 47-yea
e for this pcation was
ed the ave
er the altituurthermore
percent for
s 10 inches
00 ft. TRChile the T
ithin sout
npah Valle
ated and th
associate90 acre-ft/y
RC report.
nment Proj
Californiaundwater
for the La
over the ned 1953-200
/yr for nortand 1,184 a
n applicatizonal acrea
rom Geom
Stateli
the calculat
only the b
213,500 acneated area
the tabula
asin, Calif
el was devetewater dis
r period 1
eriod to beto the rech
age precipi
de range 6,, Glancy
the respecti
over 5,00
assumed reC report d
Ivanpah V
y is tabulat
average p
with ther. Recharg
ct, Numeri
and Clarodel that
hontan Reg
xt 20 years5. The aver
h Ivanpahcre-ft/yr for
n of theges as Glan
ga (2000)
ne Solar Farm
ion of preci
oundaries f
res for nortis 215,70
ed value.
rnia, TRC
loped for thosal at tw
53-1999. T
1,000 acrearge percen
ation was 1
00-7,000 ftssumed th
ve altitude
-6,000 ft a
harge percees not indi
alley is 331
ed in Table
mping for
operationassociated
al Groundw
County,overs both
ional Water
(ENSR Corge ground
alley (exclsouth Ivanp
axey-Eakicy (1968, T
and a rech
First S
roundwater Ava
pitation rec
r north Iv
Ivanpahacres for
(2000) desc
e Molycorpsites withi
RC (2000,
ft/yr basedages used i
0 inches ov
, and 15.5 irecharge
anges. How
titude rang
ntages of 3cate the acr
,500 acres,
7-1 of the
he 5-year p
f the Molwith the P
ater Flow
Nevada,south and
Quality C
oration, 20ater rechar
uding Jeanah Valley (
method.ble 8). Ho
arge-precipi
lar Inc.
ilability
arge
npah
alleynorth
ribed
minen the
p.28)
on an the
r the
chesas a
ever,
and
and 7eages
ased
TRC
eriod
corprimm
odel,
NSRnorth
ntrol
7, p.e for
LakeNSR
NSRever,
ation
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
8/59
ChapIntrodu
March 2011n\client\367-0
ENSR (
for nort
(ENSR,south Iv
tabulate
valley,acreage i
The grouof the E
was 2,00
Jean Laassociate
Valley),
1.3.5 Do
In the re
and KatzVegas V
recharge-
percentathat vary
Donovan
where
p
a
a
z
The valu
foot. FiEquation
Donova
er 1ction
0-11-05\wp\03111
007, Table
and south
igure 6-1).npah Valle
by Glancy
hich is abos smaller th
ndwater puSR Corpor
0 acre-ft/yr
e Valley, ad with wate
0 acre-ft/yr
novan-Kat
ort Hydrol
er (2000) dealley and a
precipitatio
es used in tcontinuous
and Katzer
aa 10
is the
0 is the
1 is the
is the
e for the int
ure 1.3 sh1.1 and tha
-Katzer rel
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
7-2) tabulat
Ivanpah Va
The tabulaty, and 500,
(1968, Tab
t 12 percenn the delin
ping withination report.
ithin north
d 3,300 acuse was 1,
within Jean
er Report
gic Implica
cribe the dedjacent area
relation.
he Maxey-Ely with pre
(2000, Equa
average ann
intercept fo
slope of the
topographic
ercept a0 is
ows a cot used by G
tion has hig
vail Repornt
es the acrea
lley, and th
d areas are00 for the
le 8). The
t larger thaated acreag
south and nThe listed
Ivanpah Val
re-ft/yr with600 acre-ft/
ake Valley,
ions of Gre
elopment as. Furtherm
hile the r
akin methoipitation. T
ion 3) for Iv
ual precipit
the relatio
relation (ft/
altitude (ft)
-0.0839 ft/y
parison oflancy (1968
her precipit
1-4
ges used in
ey delineat
213,500 acentire valle
ap deline
the tabulate by 58,500
orth Ivanpaverage pu
ley (excludi
in south Ivr within no
and 300 acr
ter Recharg
d applicatiore, they d
echarge rel
, the zonalhe point pr
anpah Valle
tion (ft/yr),
(ft/yr),
yr per foot),
.
r, and the v
the precip, Table 8).
tion than th
Stateli
the calcula
only the
es for northy, which ar
ted area is
ed value. Cacres.
Valley is tping during
ng Jean Lak
npah Vallerth Ivanpah
e-ft/yr withi
e to Las Ve
n of precipiscribe the
tion is qu
ercentagesecipitation-a
is
and
lue for the
itation-altitor altitude
e Glancy re
ne Solar Farm
ion of preci
oundary fo
Ivanpah Ve acreages i
559,400 ac
orrespondin
bulated in Tthe 6-year
e Valley), 5
. The grouValley (exc
south Ivan
as Valley,
ation-altitudevelopment
ntitatively
are replacedltitude relati
slope a1 is 0
de relationless than a
lation.
First S
roundwater Ava
pitation rec
Ivanpah
lley, 287,4dentical to
es for the
ly, the tab
ables 9-1 aneriod 1999
acre-ft/yr
ndwater recluding Jean
ah Valley.
evada, Do
e relations fof a conti
quivalent t
with perceon develop
(1.1)
.000193 ft/
representeout 7,100
lar Inc.
ilability
arge
alley
0 forthose
ntire
lated
d 9-22005
ithin
hargeLake
ovan
r Lasuous
o the
tagesd by
r per
d byt, the
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
9/59
ChapIntrodu
March 2011n\client\367-0
The poin
r
where
r
n
p
The valu
shows aby Glanc
Donova
includes
recharge
5,800 ac
er 1ction
0-11-05\wp\03111
t recharge-p
np
is the
is the
is the
is the
e for the co
comparisony (1968, Tab
and Katze
groundwat
within sou
e-ft/yr.
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
recipitation
average ann
coefficient
exponent fo
average ann
fficient i
of the precile 8). The c
r (2000, Ta
r underflo
h and nort
vail Repornt
developed
ual recharg
f the relati
r the relatio
ual precipit
s 0.05 ft1-n
/y
itation-altitnclusion is t
ble 5) sum
from Iv
Ivanpah
1-5
y Donovan
(ft/yr),
n(ft1-n
/yr1-n
)
(ft0), and
tion (ft/yr).
r1-n
, and the
de relationhat the two
arized the
npah Valle
alley, whic
Stateli
and Katzer
,
value for th
epresentedelations are
recharge f
y. The gr
h Donovan
ne Solar Farm
(2003, Equa
e exponent i
y Equationnearly identi
r Las Veg
undwater
and Katze
First S
roundwater Ava
tions 5 and
(1.2)
s 3.75. Figu
1.2 and thacal.
s Valley,
nderflow i
estimated
lar Inc.
ilability
6) is
e 1.4
used
hich
s the
to be
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
10/59
N:\Clients\367 First Solar Inc\00-11-05 Stateline G roundwater Assessment\GIS\Figures\Report_Availability_Figs\Fig11_IvanpahValley.mxd 3/18/2011
NEVADACALIFO
RNIA
MesquiteValley
ShadowValley
PiuteValley
EldoradoValle
y
LanfairValley
Las Vegas Valley
J
eanLake
Valley
S
P
R
I
N
GM
O
UN
TA
IN
S
M
C
C
U
L
L
O
U
G
H
R
A
NG
E
CLARK
MOUNTAIN
RANGE
BIRDSPRINGRANG
E
I
VANPAH
MOUNTAIN
S
NEW
YORK
MOUNTA
INS
SHEEPMTN
0 36,00018,000
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 1.1
First Solar Stateline Solar Farm
Groundwater Availability Reportt
Location of Ivanpah Valley
LEGEND
Proposed Stateline Solar Farm Site
State Boundary
Ivanpah Valley
California
Nevada
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
11/59
N:\Clients\367 First Solar Inc\00-11-05 Stateline Gr oundwater Assessment\GIS\Figures\Report_Availability_Figs\Fig12_PhysioCultFeatures.mxd 3/18/2011
NEVADA
CALIFORNIA
Roach
Playa
Ivanpah
LakePlaya
Jean
LakePlaya
S
P
R
I
N
GM
O
U
N
TA
IN
S
M
C
C
U
L
L
O
U
G
H
R
A
N
G
E
CL
ARK
MOUNTAIN
RANGE
BIR
DSPRINGRANGE
I
VANPAH
MOUNTAIN
S
NEW
YORK
MOUNTA
INS
SHEEPMTN
MesquiteValley
ShadowValley
PiuteValley
EldoradoValle
y
LanfairValley
Las Vegas Valley
JeanL
akeValley
Jean
Primm
15
15
0 36,00018,000
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 1.2
First Solar Stateline Solar Farm
Groundwater Availability Report
Physiographic and Cultural
Features of Ivanpah Valley
LEGEND
Cities in Ivanpah Valley
Proposed Stateline Solar Farm Site
Playas
Ivanpah Valley Basins
State Boundary
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
12/59
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
AveragePrecipitation(ft/yr)
0000000000 4000
4500
5000
5500
600
0
6
A
ltitud
COMP
GLANCY
500
7000
(ft)
Figu
FirstSolarStat
roundwa
terA
ARISONO
FDO
PRECIPIT
ATIO
7500
8000
e1.3
lineSolarFarm
ailabilityRepor
NOVAN-K
ATZE
-ALTITUDERE
8500
tA
ND
LATIONS
Glancy(1968)
DonovanandKat
(2003)
zer
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
13/59
Recharge(ft/yr)
.0.1.2.3.40.0
0.5
1.0
Pre
cipitati
COMP
GLANCY
on(ft/yr)
Figu
FirstSolarStat
roundwa
terA
ARISONO
FDO
ECHARG
E-P
R
1.5
e1.4
lineSolarFarm
ailabilityRepor
NOVAN-K
ATZE
CIPITATIONR
2.0
(t
AND
LATIONS
lancy(1968)
onovanand
Katze
003)
r
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
14/59
March 2011n\client\367-0
CHAP
Descri
The mos(1956).
rocks in
deposits.deposits.
consolid
CON2.1
The con
1956; Pldolomite
Spring
Valley.
age andMcCullo
the soutrocks oc
The hyd1996; H
scales.
inducedfractures
ranges
poorly psmall ap
underflo
barriers t
UNC2.2
The unc(Hewett,
Plioceneand clay
Valley.
yields toPleistoce
younger
represen
deposits
0-11-05\wp\03111
TER 2
ption of
t completehat mappin
lude carbo
Figure 2.1The uncon
ted rocks a
SOLIDATE
solidated ro
ume, 1996;of pre-Ca
ange, and
he non-car
relativelyugh Range,
eastern andur within t
aulic properrill and P
hile the ca
fracture per. Correspon
here supp
rmeable atertures at d
occurs t
o underflow
ONSOLIDA
nsolidated1956; Plu
and early. This unit
he older all
productionne and Hol
alluvium is
pluvial de
are above t
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
ydroge
eologic mag includes c
ate, intrusiv
shows theolidated de
e underlain
ROCKS
cks represe
Harrill an brian and
heep Moun
bonate rock
inor extrusNew York
southwestee McCullou
rties of theudic, 1998
bonate-roc
eability edingly, grou
rting hydra
large scalesepth limit t
rough the
.
TED DEPO
deposits coe, 1996).
leistocenenderlies th
uvium is ge
wells. Theocene ages,
generally a
osits of Ho
e regional g
vail Repornt
logic S
ping of Ivaonsolidated
e, and extr
urface exposits are u
by a basem
nt units ra
d Prudic, 1Paleozoic a
tain on the
s are mostl
ve rocks oMountains,
n borders.gh Range o
consolidate. The carb
matrix is p
ists and isndwater un
ulic gradie
. While those ability t
on-carbon
SITS
sist of alluvAn older a
ges, is covalley-flo
erally belo
ounger allis compos
ove the re
locene age,
roundwater
2-1
tting
npah Vallerocks and u
sive rocks.
sures of thderlain and
nt of silicat
ging from
998). Thege. They o
northweste
granitic a
Tertiary aClark Mou
he extrusivthe easter
d rocks varnate rocks
oorly perm
nhanced berflow can
ts exist. T
e rocks aretransmit
te-rock mo
ial and plalluvium, w
posed of gr areas wit
the region
vium, whicd of gravel
ional grou
are compos
table.
Stateli
and adjaceconsolidat
The uncons
consolidatbounded b
e metamorp
pre-Cambri
carbonate rcur within
n and nort
nd metamo
d youngertain Range
e rocks areborder of
greatly aare the mo
able, signi
dissolutiooccur thro
e granitic
fractured, pater. Corre
untain rang
a depositsich repres
avel, sand,hin both Iv
al groundw
h representand sand
dwater tabl
ed of fine s
ne Solar Farm
nt areas wad deposits.
olidated de
ed rocks anthe consol
hic rocks.
an to Terti
ocks includthe Spring
eastern boa
phic rocks
ages. They, and Ivanp
mostly basean Lake V
ong the rost permeabl
icant fault-i
of the carbgh carbona
and metam
oor fracturespondingly,
es, and tho
f Pliocenents alluvia
and silt wianpah Valle
ater table, a
alluvial-faith some s
e. The play
nd, silt, an
First S
roundwater Ava
done by HThe consoli
osits are al
d unconsolidated rocks
ry age (H
e limestonMountains,
rders of Iv
of pre-Cam
occur withiah Mountai
ltic rocks.lley.
ck types (Pe at large l
nduced and
onate rocke-rock mo
orphic rock
connectivitno ground
se ranges a
o Holocene-fan depos
h some boy and Jean
d produces
deposits oilt and clay
deposits,
clay. The
lar Inc.
ilability
ewettdated
uvial
dated. The
wett,
andBird
npah
brian
n thes on
hese
ume,ength
fold-
alongntain
s are
andater
ct as
agests of
ldersLake
good
f late. The
hich
playa
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
15/59
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
16/59
N:\Clients\367 First Solar Inc\00-11-05 Stateline Gr oundwater Assessment\GIS\Figures\Report_Availability_Figs\Fig21_Hydrogeology.mxd 3/18/2011
NEVAD
A
CALIFO
RNIA
Roach
Playa
Ivanpah
LakePlaya
Jean
LakePlaya
S
P
R
I
N
GM
O
U
NTA
IN
S
M
C
C
U
L
L
O
U
G
H
R
A
N
G
E
CLARK
MOUNTAIN
RANGE
BIRDSPRINGRANGE
I
VANPAH
MOUNTAIN
S
NEW
YORK
MOUNTA
INS
SHEEPMTN
A
A'
15
15Iva
npahFault
Roach F
ault
ClarkMountainFault
MesquiteT
hrust
StateLineFault
Ironside
Fault
McCla
nh
an
Fau
lt
SheepMountainFault
KeystoneThrust
Cedar
Canyo
nFaul
t
McCulloug
hFault
McCullo
ug
hFault
C o n t a c t T
h
r u s t
0 36,00018,000
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 2.1
First Solar Stateline Solar Farm
Groundwater Availability Report
Hydrogeology of Ivanpah Valley
LEGEND
Proposed SSF Site
Geology
Alluvium
Carbonate
Extrusive
Intrusive/Metamorphic
Cross Section
Faults
Playas
Ivanpah Valley
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
17/59
0
8,0
00
4,0
00
N:\Clients\367 First Solar Inc\00-11-05 Stateline Groundwater Assessment\GIS\Figures\Report_Availability_Figs\Fig22_HydrogeoXSec.mxd 3/18/2011
MesquiteThrust
ClarkMountainThrust
IvanpahFault
StatelineFault
RoachFault
SheepMountain/McCulloghFault
A
A'
FIGURE2.2
FirstSolarStatelineSolarF
arm
GroundwaterAvailabilityRe
port
HydrogeologicSection
T h r o u g h I v a n p a h V a l l e
y
LEGEND
GEOLOGY
Alluvium
Carbonate
Extrusive
Intrusive/Metamorphic
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
18/59
March 2011n\client\367-0
CHAP
Descri
FLO3.1
Ground
Lake VevapotraRunoff p
mountai
into thedominan
carbonat
the domi
These pr
The rech
westwarRange a
adjacentMountai
Valleys.
impede
rocks wgroundw
groundw
the valle
Correspohydraulic
condition
for 1968
groundwproduced
groundw
tabulatiogroundw
For the
southernft at the n
from moNevada
groundw
groundwcondition
the PVG
0.6 feet p
0-11-05\wp\03111
TER 3
ption of
AND RE
ater rechar
alleys. Whspiration p
roduces rec
s. Deep inf
unconsolidt process, w
e terrains. F
nant proces
ocesses tog
arged groun
or eastward New Yo
Lanfair ors and Cla
Westward
roundwater
ithin the Bater flow
ater rechar
s into Las
nding to thgradient is
s. Figure 3.1
(Table 3.1).
ter levels pby ENS
ter levels f
of measureter levels p
re-develop
end of Ivanorthern end
e than 4,20tate line, a
ter pumpi
ter-level ds are about
monitorin
er year.
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
ydrolo
HARGE
e occurs fr
ile the valrocesses, thharge by st
iltration pro
ted deposithich coinci
or the grani
s, which co
ther produc
dwater flow
d groundwark Mountai
Piute vallek Mountai
dipping thr
flow betwe
ird Spring between Iv
e within Iv
egas Valle
northwardtoward the
shows pre-
The contour
oduced byCorporati
r 2008 (Ta
d groundwaoduced by
ent conditi
ah Valley, tof Ivanpah
ft at the sd to less t
g near Pri
ecline. Wit0 ft near Pri
network ha
vail Repornt
ic Settin
m precipita
ley-floor pe mountaineambed inf
uces recha
s. For thees with the
tic and met
incides wit
e recharge a
s northward
er flow. Grs prevent
s. GraniticRange be
sts within
n Ivanpah
Range andanpah Val
npah and J
.
groundwatorth. That
evelopment
s on the fig
lancy (196n (2007,
le 3.2). Th
er levels (BNSR Corpo
on, ground
2,500 ft atalley. For c
uthern endhan 2,400
m and th
in localizemm and 20
ve displaye
3-1
g
tion on the
recipitationprecipitatioiltration, m
ge by grou
arbonate teunderdevel
morphic te
the occurr
long the ma
because of
anitic androundwate
and metatween Ivan
the Clark
alley and
the northey and L
ean Lake V
r flow witondition ha
groundwate
re were con
, Plate 1) aigure 9-8
contours o
oadbent andation (2007
ater altitud
the Californrrent condit
f Ivanpaht at the no
Primm g
areas, tht near the P
recent grou
Stateli
ountains s
tends ton producesstly on the
dwater flo
rrains, deepped stream
rrains, strea
ence of den
rgins of the
geologic co
etamorphicflow betw
orphic rocah Valley
ountain R
esquite V
ard trendis Vegas
alleys can
in Ivanpahexisted fro
r levels with
structed by
d a map of). Figure
this figure
Associates,, Tables 7-8
s range fro
a-Nevada stions, ground
alley, to abthern end
lf course
e declinesimm golf c
ndwater-lev
ne Solar Farm
urrounding
be consurunoff andalluvial fa
through th
infiltration-channel ne
mbed infiltr
se stream-c
unconsolida
ntrols that p
rock withineen Ivanpa
s occur wiand Shado
ange and S
lley. Howe
g structuraalley. Co
low only n
and Jeanm pre-devel
in the uncon
ombining a
simulated g.2 shows
were const
2009) and athrough 7-9
m more tha
ate line, andwater altitud
out 2,460 ftf Ivanpah
as produce
relative tourse. Most
l declines r
First S
roundwater Ava
vanpah and
ed entireldeep infiltrs that bord
e mountain
tends to bworks with
ation tends
annel netw
ted deposits
revent or i
the McCulValley an
thin the Ivw and Me
pring Mou
er, the carb
l texture acomitantly
rthward th
ake Valleypment to c
solidated de
map of mea
roundwaterpost-develo
ucted based
map of simand Figure
n 4,200 ft
to less thanes similarly
at the Califalley. Ho
d areas of
pre-develof the wells
nging from
lar Inc.
ilability
Jean
bytion.r the
mass
e then the
to be
orks.
.
pede
oughd the
npahquite
tains
onate
llows, the
ough
, therrent
osits
sured
levelsment
on a
lated-8B).
t the
2,400range
rnia-ever,
local
mentithin
0.3 to
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
19/59
Name Time
Observed
Groundwater
Altitude
(ft)
W-2 Steadystate 2,544
W-3 Steadystate 2,526
W-4 Steadystate 2,526
W-5 Steadystate 2,526
W-6 Steadystate 2,560
W-7 Steadystate 2,530
W-8 Steadystate 2,516
W-9 Steadystate 2,547
DWR-13 Steadystate 4,484
DWR-15 Steadystate 2,556
DWR-16 Steadystate 2,519
DWR-17 Steadystate 3,840
DWR-19 Steadystate 2,544
DWR-20 Steadystate 2,518DWR-21 Steadystate 2,500
GL-1 Steadystate 2,530
GL-3 Steadystate 2,527
GL-4 Steadystate 2,530
GL-5 Steadystate 2,530
GL-6 Steadystate 2,533
GL-8 Steadystate 3,706
GL-9 Steadystate 2,475
GL-11 Steadystate 2,496
GL-12 Steadystate 2,520
GL-13 Steadystate 2,519
GL-15 Steadystate 2,441DWR-24 Steadystate 2,551
DWR-25 Steadystate 2,546
DWR-26 Steadystate 2,523
DWR-27 Steadystate 2,533
TRC-8 Steadystate 2,548
TRC-2 Steadystate 2,600
TRC-15 Steadystate 2,560
TRC-24 Steadystate 2,507
TRC-27 Steadystate 2,534
TRC-9 Steadystate 2,521
TRC-11 Steadystate 2,538
TRC-14 Steadystate 2,544
DWR-1a Steadystate 4,338
Table 3.1. Measured Groundwater Levels for
Pre-development Conditions
N:\C\367\00-11-05\WP\Groundwater Availability Report\Tables
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
20/59
Year
ME-3
ME-4
IER-2
IER-3
OIEP-5
OIEP-7
OIEP-8
OIEP-9
PVGC#7
PVGC#8
PVGC#9
Colosseum1
Colosseum2
Stateline
Yates
M-8
M-13
M-14
1986
2,531
2,527
1987
2,536
2,529
2,481
1988
1989
1990
1991
2,535
2,529
2,530
2,533
2,483
2,533
1992
1993
2,534
2,528
2,530
2,532
2,482
2,533
1994
2,533
2,527
2,528
2,531
2,480
2,532
1995
2,534
2,528
2,529
2,532
2,482
2,531
1996
2,518
2,517
2,519
2,524
2,522
1997
2,534
2,528
2,532
2,532
2,482
2,531
2,516
2,513
2,512
2,518
2,519
2,524
2,522
2,513
1998
2,516
2,513
2,513
2,523
2,521
2,511
1999
2,528
2,524
2,534
2,529
2,526
2,529
2,485
2,530
2,515
2,515
2,516
2,500
2,519
2,522
2,521
2,510
2000
2,515
2,513
2,512
2,509
2,523
2,521
2,520
2,511
2001
2,515
2,514
2,513
2,506
2,508
2,521
2,520
2,510
2002
2,514
2,514
2,513
2,507
2,507
2,520
2,520
2,509
2003
2,514
2,513
2,513
2,505
2,508
2,520
2,519
2,508
2004
2,513
2,513
2,514
2,506
2,508
2,519
2,519
2,508
2005
2,513
2,513
2,512
2,505
2,506
2,519
2,519
2,509
2006
2,512
2,512
2,511
2,504
2,507
2,518
2,518
2,509
2,410
2,498
2007
2,512
2,512
2,511
2,503
2,507
2,518
2,518
2,509
2,409
2,498
NOTE:Waterlevelelevationsarethoserecordedforthewinterofthecorrespondingyear.
Table3.2.MeasuredG
roundwaterElevations,infeet,forCurrent(1986-2
007)Conditions
N:\C\367\00-11-05\WP\GroundwaterAvailabilityReport\Tables
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
21/59
ChapDescrip
March 2011n\client\367-0
WA3.2
The Pri
includin
includebicarbon
decreaseuse and
use are
the ten-y
closer to
Figure 3projecte
Lake (Fi
the avervalley te
to exhibi
higher T
listed on
TDS levnearest I
have con
Table 3.
the genemeasure
and PV
concentralluvial
(HCO3)
Figure 3.
and reinftype wat
depth. T
has inter
Althoug
changesboth the
Na, falli
the Na-
er 3ion of Hyd
0-11-05\wp\03111
ER QUALI
m Valley
two wells
electric coate, and m
d, or remailocation. In
s monitorin
ear period,
the valley c
.3 shows tonto a cro
gure 3.4). T
ge annuald to exhibi
t higher T
DS values
Figure 3.4.
ls tend to ianpah Dry
centrated sa
lists the e
al water quwater type
C 9 are
ations greatfan, the Co
ype water a
6 shows the
orces the relr quality, t
is is accom
ediate wate
the perce
in groundwNa-Cl and
g below on
CO3 water
ologic Sett
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
Y
olf Course
hat supply
nductancetals. Accor
ed stable thgeneral, tho
g wells exp
while those
enter or are
e ten wellsss section r
e cross sec
DS. As sht lower TD
S values. C
han those
ncrease witLake. This
lts in groun
evations of
ality typeand TDS c
characteriz
r than 500losseum w
d TDS con
percentages
ationship bee percentag
anied by a
r quality fall
tages of N
ater qualitya-HCO3 w
ly PVGC 7
ype categor
ing
vail Repornt
(PVGC) an
ater to Wh
(EC), totaling to Bro
roughout thse wells lo
erienced an
wells that
principal w
included inning rou
tion shows
wn on Figvalues wh
orrespondin
ells locate
depth. Hois most lik
water.
the screene
easured atoncentratio
d by sodi
illigramslls, M-13
centrations
of the majo
tween watere of Cl and,
increase in
ing between
are highes
over timeter types. F
nd PVGC
and has lo
3-4
ually moni
iskey Petes
dissolvedadbent and
e ten-yearated closer
overall stab
isplay an o
ter supply
n PVGCshly east to
he depth an
res 3.3 anle those we
gly, those
d farther so
ever, highly caused b
d intervals
ach well. T. The wells
um (Na)
er liter (mgnd M-14,
ess than 50
cations an
type and Tto a lesser
TDS. The
the wells ne
t near the p
s Cl, becaur example,
(Figure 3.
w TDS (Ta
Stateli
tors ground
Casino in
solids (TAssociates
eriod 1997to the valle
ilization or
erall incre
ells for the
monitoringwest and p
d screen int
3.4, wellslls closer to
ells farther
uth. TDS v
er TDS levy evaporati
of the wells
he wells faclosest to t
chloride
/L). The weare charact
mg/L.
anions co
S. Specificextent, Na i
hallowest w
ar the playa
laya, Na is
se high perM-13 has t
). This is d
le 3.3).
ne Solar Farm
ater qualit
rimm. Mon
S), pH,(2009), TD
2008 depey margins
decrease in
se in TDS
ir respective
plan. Theserpendicula
ervals color
closer to ththe center
north also
alues collec
ls occur ate losses at
, the TDS c
ll in two cahe playa, P
(Cl) type
lls located terized by
prising the
ally, for thencreases wi
ell in this c
and on the al
not as goo
centages ofe third high
spite the fa
First S
roundwater Ava
from ten
itored para
hloride, suS has incre
ding on ther whose pri
TDS throu
re either lo
owner.
ten wellsto Ivanpa
coded to di
e marginsf the valle
exhibit rela
ed July 200
shallower dthe playa,
oncentratio
egories basGC 7, PV
water and
o the westa bicarb
DS in each
wells withh increasin
tegory, PV
luvial fan.
d an indica
sodium ocest percenta
ct that M-13
lar Inc.
ilability
ells,
eters
lfate,ased,
wellmary
hout
cated
wereDry
splay
f thetend
ively
8 are
epthshich
and
d onC 8,
TDS
n theonate
well,
a-Clwell
C 9,
or of
ur inge of
is in
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
22/59
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
23/59
ChapDescrip
March 2011n\client\367-0
Samples
mixing
upgradieM-13,
wells is
Table 3.
affected
and theColosse
The hig
Colosse be limit
affected
Even ththat Na-
discussebackgro
intermed
Cl concewhen the
It is anti
and Na-
the best
of lower
er 3ion of Hyd
0-11-05\wp\03111
from moni
ith the Na-
nt of the p-14 and C
naffected b
and Figur
by limited
DS concenm 1 has the
level of
m 2, may rd to Colos
(Table 3.3 a
ugh ColossCO3 type
above, M-nd water q
iate betwee
ntrations inPVGC seri
ipated that
CO3 water
ndicators f
quality gro
ologic Sett
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
toring well
l water typ
mping welllosseum 2
saline wat
3.5 demon
ixing with
ration. Thehighest pro
production
sult in theeum 1, be
nd Figure 3.
eum 1 appeater is dis
14 and Colality in M
the wells
PVGC 7, thes wells we
the ground
quality typ
r assessing
ndwater fro
ing
vail Repornt
M-13 are r
e, because t
s (Figure 3.demonstrat
er intrusion.
trate that C
Na-Cl type
productionduction and
in this w
apture ofause wells
5).
rs to be calacing Na-
sseum 2 ha13. The sh
ear the pla
e well withe last used
ater supply
s, based o
whether pu
m depth or
3-6
epresentativ
he well is l
5). The sis that grou
olosseum 1
water, base
nd construis the deep
ll and the
a-Cl type win the vici
turing Na-Cl type wat
e Na-HCOallowest of
a and the w
the highests the prima
for the pro
the availa
ping for th
rom the ce
Stateli
e of the N
cated relati
ilarity of tndwater qu
is also of th
d on a sligh
tion informst of the we
deeper sc
ater from dity, MW-1
l type water in the vi
3 water quathe golf co
ells on the
TDS, havey supply so
osed proje
le water qu
e proposed
tral part of
ne Solar Farm
a-HCO3 wa
vely high o
e water quality in the
e Na-HCO3tly elevated
ation in Tablls in the N
eened inter
epth. This cand Colo
r at depth,cinity of th
ity that is vurse wells
lluvial fan.
eclined sinurce.
t will be a
ality data.
project is c
he groundw
First S
roundwater Ava
ter type wi
the alluvia
lity and Tvicinity of
water type
percentage
le 3.3 show-HCO3 cate
vals, relati
apture appeseum 2, ar
there is evigolf cours
ery similaras water q
Also, the N
e the late 1
ixture of
l may be o
using mov
ater basin.
lar Inc.
ilability
h no
l fan,
S inthese
ut is
of Cl
s thatgory.
e to
ars toe not
encee. As
o theality
a and
990s,
a-Cl
ne of
ment
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
24/59
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
25/59
N:\Clients\367 First Solar Inc\00-11-05 Stateline Gr oundwater Assessment\GIS\Figures\Report_Availability_Figs\Fig32_CurrentGWLevels.mxd 3/18/2011
NEVAD
A
CALIFO
RNIA
2550
3000
2800
3600
3800
4200
2500
2400
4000
2600
2600
2500
2600
2600
4000
2600
2600
15
15
0 36,00018,000
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 3.2
First Solar Stateline Solar Farm
Groundwater Availability Report
Current (2008) GroundwaterLevels
LEGEND
Wells
Interstate 15
Playas
Alluvium
Ivanpah Valley
Groundwater Elevation (ft)
10ft Contours
100ft Contours
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
26/59
N:\Clients\367 First Solar Inc\00-11-05 Stateline Gr oundwater Assessment\GIS\Figures\Report_Availability_Figs\Fig33_PVGCWellsTDS.mxd 3/18/2011
Primm ValleyGolf Club (PVGC)
Unnamed Butte
A
A'
M-14
330 mg/L
PVGC 8
940 mg/L
Colosseum 2
350 mg/L
Colosseum 1
450 mg/L
WP-6
760 mg/L
WP-5
560 mg/L
M-13
340 mg/L
PVGC 9
720 mg/L
PVGC 7
1,300 mg/L
M-8
2,300 mg/L
Yates
Stateline
IvanpahFault
15
0 3,5001,750
Scale in Feet
FIGURE 3.3
First Solar Stateline Solar Farm
Groundwater Availability Report
TDS in Wells
LEGEND
TDS - July 2008
300 - 350 mg/L
351 - 700 mg/L
701 - 1,000 mg/L
1,001 - 1,500 mg/L
> 1,500 mg/L
No TDS Data
Well Projections
Cross Section
Fault
Interstate 15
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
27/59
23333344
567
89@
AB
CD
E77@
F
G H
I
P
P
Q
R
Q
S
P
I
T
U
V W
X Y
I
`
P
V
V W
a
Y
Q
R
SY
I
R
Q
b
`
P
V
V
a
c
R
W
R
Q
H
U
dW
P
e
f g
h
d
i
h
R
Q
b
R
Q
p
q
`
UW
dW
P
e
UW
U
hY
R
Q
S
P
W
S
R
i
r
st
2
u
v
v
3
v
v
v
3
3
v
v
3
w
v
v
3
x
v
v
3
u
v
v
4
v
v
v
4
3
v
v
v
y
p
q
U
Q
e
p
q
U
I
P
Q
Y
S
Q
S
P
Q
e
P
e
S
Y
i
Y
Q
R
S
Y
I
b
IY
d
Q
e
q
U
Q
e
p
q
P
W
H
I
P
P
Q
P
i
U
S
P
Y
X
S
P
e
P
h
S
W
Y
X
p
q
2
v
v
v
j k
l
m
4
v
v
n
v
v
j k
l
m
n
v
v
o
v
v
j k
l
m
o
v
v
2
n
v
j k
l
m
2
n
v
v
Q
Y
`
Q
`
R
S
H
P
I
S
U
R
Q
S
g
e
`
U
S
P
I
V
P
T
P
V
H
U
Q
b
P
W
P
e
e
P
h
S
Y
X
a
c
X
P
P
S
U
Q
e
p
q
z{{|}~s
z{{|}
~
3
v
v
v
j
v
y
v
y
v
v
y
y
CROSS
rs
4
v
v
v
Figu
FirstSolarStat
roundwa
terA
SECTION
DISP
|z
|
r
w
v
v
v
e3.4
lineSolarFarm
ailabilityRepor
LAYINGTDSIN
n
v
v
v
tWELLS
|{
x
v
v
v
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
28/59
eference:
Bro
Ground-water
rimm
Valley
California,May.a
dbent
&
As
onitoring
Te
Golf
Club,Is
ociates,
2009,
-Year
Report,
anpah
Valley,
G
Figu
FirstSolarStat
roundwa
terA
OUNDWA
TER
e3.5
lineSolarFarm
ailabilityRepor
QUALITYTREN
tS
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
29/59
March 2011n\client\367-0
CHAP
Quanti
DEFI4.1
The gro
groundwrechargein turn i
outflows
Las Vegdeclines.
balance
where
The rate
GRO4.2
The gro
within th
4.2.1 Pu
Based othe aver
The ave
Jean Lak
principalPrimm (
Californi
course (1
0-11-05\wp\03111
TER 4
fication
NITION OF
ndwater bu
ater basin,from the mnclude dee
include pu
as Valley.Based on t
ccording to
QWUMP
MP is the
WU is the
P is gro
U is the
S is the
of groundw
UNDWATE
ndwater ou
e valleys an
mping
a compilatge pumpin
age pumpin
e Valley, an
pumping i610 acre-ft/
a, the princ
,660 acre-ft
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
f Groun
GROUND
dget is an a
hich incluountain prec
percolatio
ping and g
he storagee physical
the relation
QQ UP
recharge fr
recharge as
ndwater pu
underflow t
rate of grou
ter-storage
R OUTFLO
tflows from
d underflow
ion of groufor the 16
g within N
d the pumpi
n descendiyr), mining
pal pumpin
/yr), Primm
vail Repornt
dwater B
ATER BU
ccounting o
des both Ivipitation an
resulting
oundwater
hanges corlaw of mass
.
S
m mountai
ociated wit
mping (acr
o Las Vegas
dwater-sto
change is p
S
Ivanpah a
s to Las Ve
dwater pu-year perio
vada was a
ng within C
g order inuses (400
g in descen
(860 acre-ft
4-1
udget
GET
f the inflow
anpah andd water-usefrom either
nderflows
espond toconservati
precipitati
water use
-ft/yr),
Valley (ac
age change
sitive for i
d Jean Lak
as Valley a
ping data b1990-2005
bout 2,000
alifornia wa
lude the wcre-ft/yr),
ing order i
/yr), and Co
Stateli
s, outflows,
ean Lakereturn flowirrigation
from Ivanpa
he dewaterin, these w
n (acre-ft/y
(acre-ft/yr),
e-ft/yr), an
(acre-ft/yr).
creasing gr
e Valleys i
s follows:
y ENSR Cwas about
acre-ft/yr, i
s about 3,3
ater supplind industri
clude the
losseum Mi
ne Solar Farm
and storag
alleys. Th. The water
or wastewa
h and Jean
ng due to gter-budget
r),
undwater l
clude grou
rporation (5,300 acre-
cluding 50
0 acre-ft/yr
s for Jeanal uses (15
ater supplie
ne (660 acr
First S
roundwater Ava
changes f
inflows in-use returner disposal.
ake Valley
roundwateromponents
(4.1)
vels.
dwater pu
007, Tableft/yr (Table
acre-ft/yr
. For Nevad
(690 acre-acre-ft/yr)
s for Prim
-ft/yr).
lar Inc.
ilability
r the
cludeflows
The
s into
levelmust
ping
9-1),4.1).
ithin
a, the
t/yr),. For
golf
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
30/59
Pumping
(acre-ft/yr)
Return
(percent)
Return
(acre-ft/yr)
Consumptive1
Use
(acre-ft/yr)
Implied
Area2
(acres)South Ivanpah Valley
Molycorp 0 0 0 0 0
Colosseum Mine 660 39 260 400 80
Primm Casinos 860 41 350 510 102
Golf Course 1,660 30 500 1,160 232
Calneva 1 0 0 1 0
Nipton 30 33 10 20 4
Desert 50 40 20 30 6
Total 3,261 35 1,140 2,121 424
Ivanpah Valley, NevadaGoodsprings 120 42 50 70 14
Jean 690 41 280 410 82
Primm Municipal 610 39 240 370 74
Mining Total 400 40 160 240 48
Industrial Total 150 40 60 90 18
Domestic, etc. 40 25 10 30 6
Jean Lake Valley 50 40 20 30 6
Total 2,060 40 820 1,240 248
TOTAL 5,321 37 1,960 3,361 672
Table 4.1. Groundwater Pumping and Water-Use Returns
within Ivanpah and Jean Lake Valleys, 1999 - 2008
1The consumptive use (or net pumping) is the pumping minus the water-use returns to the
groundwater system.2Based on consumptive use of 5 ft/yr.
Geographic Location
N:\C\367\00-11-05\WP\Groundwater Availability Report\Tables
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
31/59
ChapQuantifi
March 2011n\client\367-0
Not incl
operatin
restart mterm pla
Figure 3
Valleys
4.2.2 Un
The groprecipita
conditio
at the noto Las V
the grou
unchangis in ess
section, t
GRO4.3
The groprecipita
4.3.1 Pr
Within t
using threchargefor Ivanp
The Ma
derived
Survey (grid co
correspo
distributi
an altitu
have anunder th
area-weiarea-wei
er 4cation of G
0-11-05\wp\03111
uded in Ta
, and only
illing operafor the m
.8-9), presu
emains abo
derflows
undwater uion for both
described b
th end of Ivegas Valley
dwater altit
d from theence uncha
he pre-devel
UNDWATE
ndwater intion and ret
cipitation
e work sc
Maxey-Ea-precipitatioah Valley.
ey-Eakin
rom a 30-
007). Theering Ivan
ding to th
on of altitu
e less than
ltitude lesscurve equ
ghted averaghted avera
roundwate
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
ble 4.1 is
a small am
ions in theine is to pu
ming the p
t the same
nderflowspre-develo
y Glancy (1
anpah Vallewas just su
ude and hyd
pre-developged from
opment und
R INFLOW
flows to Ivrns due to
echarge
pe for this
in method.n relationshose relati
ethod was
eter DEM (
EM repres pah and J
e grid is s
e. The verti
a particula
than 4,750ls the area-
ge altitudee altitude w
Budget
vail Repornt
umping fo
unt of wat
future, andmp about
oportional
s in the pas
into Lasment and p
968), the gr
such that tficient to p
raulic gradi
ent conditithe pre-dev
erflow was
npah andater use as
eport, the
The rechareveloped bns are resta
applied to
digital elev
nts the altitean Lake
own on Fi
cal axis is t
value. Fo
t. A cumulweighted av
ithin northithin south
4-3
r the Mol
r is being
he mine is20 acre-ft/
sage betw
t (ENSR, 2
egas Valleost-develop
undwater u
he hydraulicss the rech
nt at the n
on, whichlopment c
bout 6,200
ean Lakefollows:
echarge fro
e was estiDonovan
ed as Equa
the geogra
tion model
ude at eachvalleys. T
gures 4.1a-
e altitude.
example,
tive-distriberage of th
Ivanpah Vvanpah Val
Stateli
corp mine.
used. Howe
expected tor within Iv
en well fi
00, p. 3-15
y equal tent conditi
derflow pr
gradient thrge. For the
rth end of I
eans the undition. A
acre-ft/yr.
alleys incl
m mountai
ated usingand Katzerions 1.1 an
hic distrib
download
point withie geograp
b as graph
he horizont
igure 4.1a
tion graphplotted qu
alley is 3,9ley is 4,100
ne Solar Farm
The mine
ver, the mi
start mininanpah Vall
lds in Ivan
).
e rechargeons. For the
duced a gro
ough the Bipost-devel
vanpah Vall
derflow todiscussed
de recharg
precipitati
the precipit(2003, Equ1.2 in this
tion of top
d from the
a 30-meteric distribu
illustratin
al axis is th
indicates th
has the propantity. Fro
00 ft. Fromft.
First S
roundwater Ava
currently i
e is expect
later. They (ENSR,
ah and Sh
from mopre-develop
undwater al
rd Springspment cond
ey are esse
as Vegasin the foll
from mo
n was esti
tion-altitudtions 3, 5 aeport.
ographic al
U. S. Geol
(about 100tion of al
the cumu
acreage th
at 202,000
erty that thFigure 4.1
Figure 4.1
lar Inc.
ilability
s not
ed to
long-000,
adow
ntainment
itude
angeition,
tially
alleywing
ntain
ated
e andnd 6)
itude
gical
foot)itude
lative
t has
acres
areaa, the
, the
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
32/59
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
33/59
Tabulated
DelineatedTa
bulated(a)
Delineated
Tabulated(d)Delineated(b)Tabulated(a)
Deline
ated(c)
IvanpahValley
Below4000
150,978
350,195
152,913
North
4000-5000
196,080
50,016
196,080
152,994
49,480
5000-6000
13,010
11,130
13,010
45,930
11,082
6000-7000
3,560
2,459
3,560
9,332
3,382
7000-8000
780
720
780
897
948
8000-9000
30
115
30
78
142
Total
213,4
60
215,4
18
213,4
60
559,4
26
217,9
48
217,9
48
IvanpahValley
Below4000
199,992
201,257
South
4000-5000
259,780
98,543
259,780
104,148
5000-6000
25,410
28,718
25,410
32,021
6000-7000
1,830
4,108
1,830
4,455
7000-8000
370
109
370
424
8000-9000
0
Total
287,3
90
331,4
70
287,3
90
342,3
04
342,3
04
Total
500,8
50
500,8
50
559,4
26
560,2
52
560,2
52
(a) Notgiveninreport.
(b) ValuesfornorthIvanpahValleyincludeJeanLakeValleyandIvanp
ahValleySouth.
(c) ValuesfornorthIvanpahValleyincludeJeanLakeValley.
(d) Acreagelistedforaltituderan
ge4,000-5,000ftincludesaltitudesbe
low4,000ft.
Tab
le4.2.
ComparisonofWatershedAcreagesUsedbyGlancy,
TRC,
ENSRCorporation,
DonovanandKatzer,andThisStudy
GeographicArea
Altitu
de
Range
(ft)
Area(acre
s)
Glancy(1968)
TRC(2000)
ENSRC
orporation
(2
007)
Donovanand
Katzer(2000
)
This
Study(c)
N:\C\367\00-11-05\WP\GroundwaterAvailabilityReport\Tables
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
34/59
ChapQuantifi
March 2011n\client\367-0
The ave
Corporat
relationrecharge
are in er
The diff
listed in
CorporatTable 4.
respectiv
maps inwatershe
altitude
recharge
betweenFor the
delineate
report winconsist
report as
shown o
4.3.2 W
The pu
valley relandscap
evapotra
is referre
of the wsystem a
ENSR C
returns a
Valley (south Iv
correspo
for the n
and 1,21the lands
LANDS
vegetati
er 4cation of G
0-11-05\wp\03111
age annual
ion (2007).
(ENSR, 20is the resul
or with resp
rences am
able 4.2 a
ion (2007,lists the t
e reports,
luded in td boundari
elations id
-precipitatio
the Glancyouth Ivanp
d acreage.
ith respectent with its
shown on
Figure 4.6
ter-Use Re
ped ground
turns to theing or gol
spiration.
d to as an i
astewater egain by dee
orporation (
re listed in
xcluding Janpah Vall
ding consu
orth Ivanpa
0 acre-ft/yrcaping, gol
T false-col
n, and the b
roundwate
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
recharge d
While EN
7, p. 7-2)mostly of
ect to south
ng acreage
d Figures 4.
able 7.2 abulated and
here a listi
e respectivs contained
ntified in t
n relations.
and this reh Valley, t
he Glancy
to the tabuown deline
Figures 4.5
, except for
urns
water that i
groundwatef-course tu
owever, pa
rigation ret
aporates frpercolatio
2007, Table
Table 4.1.
an Lake Vay, which i
mptive uses
Valley (e
for south Iv-course, an
or infrared
lack areas i
Budget
vail Repornt
erived in t
R Corpora
hat differssing the Gl
Ivanpah Va
, precipitati
5 and 4.6 f
d pp. 7-2delineated
g exists. T
e reports,in the res
e respectiv
For north
ort with ree TRC rep
and ENSR
lated acreaation. Diffe
. However,
he TRC rep
s not expor
r system. Tf is irriga
rt returns to
rn. When
m the pon, which is r
9-1) estim
he listed re
lley), 20 aceach case
, which are
cluding Jea
npah Vallewastewate
mage for s
dicate wate
4-6
is report a
tion used a
slightly froancy (1968,
lley, by und
on-altitude,
r Glancy (1
nd 7-3), aacreages. T
e delineate
here againective repo
e reports, a
Ivanpah Va
spect to botrt and this
Corporatio
es. Additioent precipi
similar rec
ort.
ed from Iv
e returns aed, part o
the ground
astewater
surface. Heferred to as
ted the irri
turns inclu
re-ft/yr forrepresents
the pumpin
n Lake Val
y. These cor pond acre
mmer 2010
r.
Stateli
lso is large
slightly d
DonovanTable 8) ac
erstating th
and rechar
968, Table
d this repohe tabulate
d acreage is
a figure erts. Figure
nd Figure
lley, Table
h the tabulreport are
reports ea
nally, theation-altitu
arge-preci
npah Valle
e referred tf the appl
ater syste
isposal occ
owever, paa wastewat
ation and
e 1,140 ac
ean Lakeabout 40 p
s minus th
ley), 30 acr
sumptive-ages sugges
. The red to
ne Solar Farm
than that
fferent pre
-Katzer relareages. The
actual acre
ge-precipita
), TRC (20
rt (Figuresacreage is
that derive
xists. Figur4.5 shows
.6 shows t
4.2 indicat
ted and delonsistent w
ch are inco
NSR Corpe relations
itation rela
y or is con
as water-ued water i
by deep p
urs in infilt
t returns toer return.
astewater r
e-ft/yr for t
alley, andercent of th
returns, ar
e-ft/yr for J
se values ated by Figu
pink areas
First S
roundwater Ava
stated by
ipitation-al
tion, the sGlancy acr
ages.
ion relatio
00, p. 28),
.1 throughthat listed i
d from bou
e 4.4 showhe precipit
e correspo
es a consis
ineated acreith respect
sistent wit
oration repare used in
ions are us
umed withi
se returns.s consume
ercolation,
ation ponds
the ground
eturns, and
e north Iv
00 acre-ft/e pumpage.
2,120 acre
an Lake V
e consistene 4.7, whic
indicate irri
lar Inc.
ilability
NSR
itude
allereages
s are
NSR
4.3).n the
dary
s thetion-
ding
tency
ages.o the
this
rt iseach
ed as
n the
hend by
hich
, part
ater
those
npah
r forThe
-ft/yr
alley,
withis a
gated
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
35/59
ChapQuantifi
March 2011n\client\367-0
Table 4.
Firstly,
reopen,2000, p.
GRO4.4
A chang
levels ha
desaturamultiplie
1953-20
system lbased on
returns a
9-2) repthe ENS
is 328,6
outflows
year periacre-ft/y
This sto
consumpand retu
will not
reduce tand Jean
based on
within Iv
the vallewill be e
er 4cation of G
0-11-05\wp\03111
does not li
he mine c
ater-use re2-25) is to e
UNDWATE
e in ground
ve declined
ed unconsd by a spe
8. That st
ss the cuman average
re 36,500 a
rt. The cuCorporati
0 acre-ft, b
is 70,600 a
od 1953-20.
rage chang
tion. Eventns, were th
occur until
e underfloLake valle
the model
anpah Vall
, eventuallceedingly l
roundwate
1 tb1 R Grndwatr A
st a water-u
rrently is n
turns will nvaporate all
R-STORAG
ater levels
locally as
lidated depific yield v
rage chang
ulative outfannual rec
re-ft, based
ulative pun (2007, T
sed on a ti
cre-ft, whic
05. The co
e has occ
ally the gre current or
groundwat
to Las Ves. The peri
simulations
y, includin
will reducong.
Budget
vail Repornt
e return for
ot operatin
t be produwastewater
E CHANG
correspond
uch as 40
osits correalue, is the
e equals t
lows. The carge of 6,2
on the retu
ping is 107ble 9-2) re
e-invariant
also is the
responding
rred even
oundwaterprojected
er levels w
as Valley bod required
performed
total pump
the underfl
4-7
the Molyco
. Secondly
ed becausein ponds lo
S
s to a chan
t within Iv
ponding tgroundwate
e 56-year
umulative p00 acre-ft/y
ns tabulate
,100 acre-ft,ort. The cu
rate of 6,20
cumulative
1953-2008
though the
ystem wouumping to
ithin Ivanp
the amoufor equilib
y ENSR C
ing that is l
ow to Las
Stateli
rp mine. Th
, even tho
the operatiated at the
e in groun
npah Valle
the grour storage c
cumulative
recipitationr (Table 4.
in the EN
, based on tmulative un
0 acre-ft/yr.
groundwat
average rat
precipitati
ld equilibrapersist for
h Valley
t of the conation is on
orporation
ss than the
egas Valle
ne Solar Farm
is is the cas
gh the min
g plan forine.
water stora
since 195
dwater-tablange for th
inflows to
recharge is). The cum
R Corpora
e pumpingderflow to
The net of
er-storage c
e of storage
on recharg
te with thelong perio
ave decline
sumptive usthe order o
2007, p. 9-
precipitatio
, but again
First S
roundwater Ava
for two rea
e is expect
he mine (E
ge. Ground
. The volu
e decline,e 56-year p
the ground
328,600 alative wat
ion (2007,
also tabulaas Vegas
hese inflow
ange for th
change is
is larger
current pud. However
d sufficien
e within Ivmany cent
). Any pu
recharge
he response
lar Inc.
ilability
sons.
ed to
SR,
ater
e of
wheneriod
ater
re-ft,r-use
able
ed inalley
s and
e 53-
1,300
than
ping, that
ly to
npahries,
ping
ithin
time
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
36/59
2,00
4,00
6,00
8,00
10,00
Altitude(Feet)
0000000
50,000
100,
UMULATIVEDI
000
Area(Acr
F
igur
FirstSolarStat
roundwa
terA
TRIBUTIONOF
NORTH
IVAN
150,000
s)
e4.1a
lineSolarFarm
ailabilityRepor
TOPOGRAPHI
PAHVALLEY
200,000
tALTITUDEFO2
0,000
8/3/2019 Stateline Solar Appendix K Stateline GW Availability Report
37/59
246810
Altitude(Feet)
0
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
Top Related