SS4115 Group Project
Analysis of Integrated Social Work Practice in Welfare Organizations
---- Focused study on IFSC
Group Members:
Lee Yin King 50564784Hung Yuen Chun 50573756Chan Kit Ying 50547646Siu Lok Ming 50552411Yau Yuen King 50383739Lin Hau Yin 50547425Yeung Man Cham 50487946Wong Lai Ping 50459310
Table of Contents
Introduction of One- Stop Service Historical development of Integrated Service Ideal model of IFSC Model of integration on IFSC Advantages of integration Disadvantages of integration Difficulties in implementing integrated practice Ways of solving difficulties Positive and Negative Comments Conclusion Reference
Introduction of One –Stop Service
One- Stop Services provides a diversify, comprehensive and preventive services on the community.
Its major functions and services are: Hotlines Services Understanding Local Community Trust-building among the residents
One- Stop Services
The principles of One-Stop Services are, to respond proactively on local needs and allocated resources with flexibility and elasticity in the following areas:
Human Resources Financial Resources Equipment Spatial which are also corresponding to the idea of “Cost
Effectiveness”.
Another major principles of One-Stop Services are to responds swiftly and directly again on the local needs.
One-Stop Services
Example of carrying out one-stop serviceTarget ABackground Information:Background Information: Middle-aged woman, approached the center and
seek helps on financial assistance.Flow of providing one-stop servicesFlow of providing one-stop services:Comprehensive Assessment at the center Apart from the financial
difficulties, Problems on Spousal Relationship and Parenting also discovered Social Worker encouraged Target A to join training services / Attending Family Education Group / Participated in Counseling Services Being employed after the training program / Improvement in Spousal Relationship / Improvement in Parenting Skills. (Cheng, 2001)
From the above example, it helps to illustrate that One-stop services merge from remedy services to developmental services.
One-Stop Services
Historical Development ofIntegrated Service
1991 White Paper
- government announced that children and youth centers, outreach social work and school social work were to be integrated and co-operated together under neighborhood basis meaning that the same team of workers serve young people within the same area
Children and youth were the first target group to be under integration services
Historical Development of Integrated Service--IFSC
1993 - The Hong Kong Council of Social Services
suggested to establish Integrated Family Services Center so that family services centers, family life education, senior social workers and family guidance services were to be integrated. However, it was due to the extra expenditure needed for integration, the plan has been left aside.
Historical Development of Integrated Service--- IFSC 2000-2001- Study of family services reviewed that family problems
were more and more popular and serious- Family services were involved with youth services in
which the allocation of services was not concentrated and repeated with existing family services
- Integration of family services was established under three elements: primary prevention (family resources unit), secondary prevention (family support unit, tertiary prevention (family counseling unit)
To review, because: remedial services absorbed most resources preventive services were neglected
IDEAL MODEL OF IFSC
Direction and Rationale
Child-centered ( 兒童為重 )
Family-focused ( 家庭為本 )
Community-based ( 社區為基礎 )
Basic Principles
1. Accessibility
2. Early identification
3. Prevention
4. Integration
5. Partnership
A three-tiered model to support families
Tertiary
Specialized services and crisis intervention
eg. domestic violence, child abuse, suicide
Secondary
Range of support services from development programme to intensive counseling
Primary
Prevention of problems and crisis
eg. publicity, education & early identification
A three-tiered model to support families
SWD’s role: Reorganization strengthens community-based
service planning and delivery
NGO’s role: Lump Sum Grant allows more flexibility and
cost-effective use of resources
IFSC (ideal model)
15 pilot projects finished operation in 2004
Family Resource Unit
Family Support Unit
Family Counseling Unit
- Open, development, prevention
- Supporting families at risk
- Treatment oriented
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001.
Family Resource Unit
Functions: Easy to catch cases Early identification Educational, developmental Support and preventive Empowerment and advocacy
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.79.
Core Services: Drop-in services Information giving Family life education Developmental groups Mutual help groups Volunteer development outreach
Family Resource Unit
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.79.
Complementary Service Hotlines Employment skills training After school care / tutoring Child minding / occasional child care Respite care Play groups Recreational / social activities Toy library Research
Family Resource Unit
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.79.
Family Support Unit
Functions: Some remedial Preventive Support Advocacy
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.79.
Core Services: Brief counseling Emotional support Referral for tangible services mutual help groups Family education
Complementary Service: Family aide service
Family Support Unit
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.79.
Family Counseling Unit
Functions: Remedial
Core Services: Intensive counseling Therapeutic groups Crisis intervention
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.79.
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
1.IFSC ↔ Community-based social services unit
2.IFSC ↔ Social service units
3.IFSC ↔ Community organizations
4.IFSC ↔ Specialized units
5.IFSC ↔ Educational bodies
6.IFSC ↔ Other professionals
7.IFSC ↔ Government Offices
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
Service/Worker-oriented Integration(Different service units or workers join together)
1. IFSC ↔ Community-based social services uniteg. FARC/GWU, FARC/CC, CC, IT, C&YC
Type of relationship: early identification & referral Screening & referral of cases to IFSC Cooperation at project level collaboration
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.80.
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
Service/Worker-oriented Integration
2. IFSC ↔ Social service unitseg. SSFU, SSW, MSS, M/E, children’s homes, rehabilitation units, elderly centers, PMCs, SPCs, CD projects, etc.
Type of relationship: early identification & referral Cooperation at project level
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.80.
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
Service/Worker-oriented Integration
3. IFSC ↔ Community organizationseg. women’s labour & residents’ associations, self-help groups, disabled & parent organizations, etc.
Type of relationship: early identification & referral
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.80.
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
4. IFSC ↔ Specialized unitseg. FCPSU, CCSU, CP, FLERC, Child assessment center, etc.
Type of relationship: Referral and support
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.80.
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
Agency-oriented Integration(different agencies join together)
5. IFSC ↔ Educational bodieseg. child care centers, kindergartens, primary schools, special schools, skill centers, SGO/SGT, PATs, etc.
Type of relationship: early identification & referral Cooperation at project level
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.80.
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
Profession-oriented Integration (Different professionals join together)
6. IFSC ↔ Other professionalseg. lawyers, medical practitioners, psychiatrists, educational psychologists, etc.
Type of relationship: early identification & referral
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.80.
Partnership with the community and the Social Services System
Agency-oriented Integration
7. IFSC ↔ Government Officeseg. Hospital & MCHCs, Department of Housing, Labour & Legal Aid, Marriage Registry, etc.
Type of relationship: early identification & referral Cooperation at project level
Source: Report on the Review of Family Services “Meeting the Challenge: Strengthening Families”. Department of Social Work and Social Administration. The University of Hong Kong June 2001. p.80.
Further Illustration on Models of integration exist in IFSC
Method-oriented integrationProfession-oriented integrationNetworking & Case managementAgency-oriented integration
Method-oriented integration
Using all three social work interventions– casework (e.g.counselling service), group work( e.g. parenting group) , community work (e.g.mass programme: community education)
In dealing with cases which involve parenting difficulties, case workers may refer clients to join some parenting groups.
i.e. casework+group work
Profession-oriented integration
E.g. In dealing with cases which involve suspected
child abuse, social workers may call different professions such as psychologists, doctors, and police to join together for a case conference to investigate the case and discuss the welfare of the victim
i.e. Multiple Professional Case Conference (MPCC) Social workers+psychologists+doctors+police
Networking & Case ManagementE.g. Referring clients to food banks in case they could not
support their meals or are not entitled to apply for financial assistance
Referring clients to non-profit corporations such as Crossroads International to obtain tangible goods (furniture and electronic appliances)
Referring clients to join Intensive Employment Assistance Projects to help them find jobs
IFSC+Tangible assistance
IFSC+Employment assistance
Agency oriented integration
E.g. Community Harmony Project held from
June18 to July 19 in 2006 in Tuen MunIFSCs under the SWD+ Hong Kong Police Force+ Tuen Mun District Women’s Association+ IFSC under the Caritas
Looking at Reality
--- Opinions gathered from observation/
interviews of workers/discussion
Advantages of integration
For Service Users: User friendly, physically convenient for clients
( Past: service users approach different agencies by themselves
Now in IFSC: one-stop service or workers make referral , reduce intake procedures)
Quantity of services increases while the same resources are introduced More prevention programs held at district level
For Workers: Training programs for improving skills which match IFSC services Workers can develop diversified skills in handling varieties of cases /
and for using different intervention approaches/ wider exposure
For Center:
Better coordination and communication between the staff in the centre
Can get in touch with different types of problems and services.
Services are diversified and elastic which matched the ideas of “Cost-Effectiveness”.
Share materials of programme : reducing cost Efficient services to community needs.
Advantages of integration
Provide the total integration (one-stop service): -can have total assessment for the client-can find the different needs of one clientThe client can obtain the total service Increase the co-operation among different
professionals and service units-the resources can be used more flexibly- 不同專業 : 互相配合 , 互補不足 ( mutual
complementary)-the quality of services can be increased and
guaranteed
Example
In the past, the Family Resources Centre had an annual fund about $330000 for holding programs and groups for the whole district in Tuen Mun
At present, there are four Integrated Family Service Centres in Tuen Mun, each has about $90000 for programs and groups
IFSCs have to meet the service quota under the Funding Service Agreement
Services
Disadvantages of integration
For Centre Unable to provide one-stop services IFSCs are not competent in every aspect of
services. In comparison to some specialized units,
IFSCs may not be able to provide the same quality of services in some areas as those specialized units
It is uncertain whether it is more cost effective because it is difficult to measure the quality of services
Disadvantages of integration (Cont’)For service users Service users are sometimes transferred from
one centre to another, this creates confusion for them
For workers Workers’ burden increase a lot, this certainly
creates discontent and adjustment difficulties among the workers
Demand workers to have multiple skills ( case, group and community work) and increases their stress
The support system for workers is not enough
Disadvantage and Side-effects of integration For further explanation of the disadvantages on
integration, it can be divided into 2 major aspects, each aspect could also be divided into 2 areas to look into the problems
They are the worker side and the center side
To explore these area, we have read some reports and interview some social workers to understand more
Disadvantage and Side-effects of integration
Social Worker Center
3 Social work interventions(case, group ,community work)
Psychological Client’s feeling
Management
Integration
Social worker psychological aspects
According to a report of SWAC 11/03 on the evaluation report of integration services
Worker’s worry- Loss of work
- Cannot adapt the changes
- New services need to introduces
Social working interventions(case, group ,community work) Social Worker’s difficulties
- Integrated in services but workers lack of integrated experiences
- Worker’s should also work in the interventions who are not familiar and interest in
- Worker’s work load increase as holding variety of work in (individual, clients level – case, group and the society level community work sometimes)
- A worker is handling 60- 80 cases at the same time, still need to spend much time on group and programme preparation
- Always worry about the cases would have life danger but worker have insufficient time to handle– extremely high pressure
Center level’s side effectsClient aspect- Although it provide the convenience, some workers are not so
good at different working skills, it affects the quality of service
- Too much workload of worker also lower the quality of service received by service users
- Finally, they still need to be wait and take more time for the referral and intervention
- But actually the clients think less of integration, they most concern about how the service can help them
Family services center level side effects
Management- Center in-charge need to spend more time on
communicating the difficulties during the integration (However, not so many I.C. do so)
- There may have different management method and culture in various IFSC , the center-in-charges apply their own way in organize the resources. As a result, the integration culture is not consistent.
Family services center level side effects
-worker’s communication also plays important role in integration the services as the case transfer internally in the centre, however, one social worker point out these kinds of software on integration are not well developed and prepared for the integration
Family services center level side effects
- Provide some training to worker on the specific working intervention that they are not good at
(However, the daily work are too heavy to process on-job training)To code an example 一名家庭生活教育工作員服務有 50,000 名 10
至 50 歲市民之社區
Difficulties in implementing integrated practiceand solutions
Not much cases can be treated by group work, casework remain the focus
Workers’ inadequate knowledge on group work because they used to deal with cases only, and those who used to work in Community Centres find difficulty in dealing with cases
Worker’s inadequate knowledge in carrying out therapeutic groups for intensive treatment for clients
Difficulties in implementing integrated practice
Group session is limitedthe group’s culture in IFSC is 4 sessions per groupboth supportive / therapeutic groupthere is limited time to develop the group cohesion difficult to reach the aims of therapeutic in short time
Difficulties in implementing integrated practice
Limitation in reality
Integration give service users an impression that it can provide any kind of services
IFSC also has its limitation in resources
Thus, maintain close contact and referral to other community resources is common
Difficulties in implementing integrated practice
Confused responsibility /service boundary
-since the integration aims to provide one-shop service to the service user, sometimes other service will transfer their client for service
-there is a misunderstanding about service delivery
-”throw ball” between other agency may arise
- the reality is IFSC may not get responsibility in the situation
-IFSC also has its limitation in resources and boundary
Ways to solve the difficulties
Solution to Confused responsibility /service boundary
-maintain good cooperation , clear communication and setting guidelines/ agreement with other agency for service delivery
-When some case arguments are raised, use client’s benefit as priority
-seek for alternative solution between agencies
Ways to solve the difficulties
Solutions to improve service quality: Provide flexible and concise training courses and
workshops for workers on group work and therapies More work supervision Increase mutual support between workers exchange professional ideas with expertise Better utilize the strength of different worker –- more
division of work / a certain level of specialization inside the team
e.g. ASWO focuses more on casework and therapeutic group
Increase no. of workers ( increase funding needed) Comprehensive training needed in institution
Positive Comments It is a diversify and large-scale model which
provides varieties services which are easily assess to.
It helps to shorten the period in the process of referring cases and could make intervention within a shorter period of time.
It integrated with different kinds of services could lessen the duration for the residents in seeking information.
There are different kinds of services available within the setting and services users could choose their suitable and best services under the supervisions and suggestions from IFSC.
Our Comments on the integration
The services ranged from preventive to remedial, served as a more professional image on the community and could help to strengthen its foundation in the locality, as a result, the residents in the community will be clearer on where and how they can seek helps and information.
It helps to lessen the financial expenses of the government as IFSC is running under the “Cost-Effectiveness” principle.
As IFSC is working on the whole community, it helps to balance different kinds of services’ needs and development, which as a result turns to be more favorable to the locality as their needs can be better satisfied.
IFSC also work at advocating new services to meet the changing needs on the community and as a result, it helps to bring better services to the residents.
Positive Comments
Comments on the integration
Negative comments- The integration actually contain a lot of good ideas and the
effectiveness of using resources. However, the “software” of integration are not enough to support the workers and the center.
- It seems that integration is to save resources instead of using resources more effectively since the effectiveness of integration on family services is unsure. The results on it varies according to the perspectives that the researcher adopts , the reports done by Hong Kong University are supported by H.K. government and therefore contains bias
- Under the Funding Service Agreement, each IFSC has to try hard to meet the quota, it emphasizes too much on quantity of service provided but the quality of services is not ensured
To code some example, software of S.W. support is limited, no spare time to have further training, no ways to share the pressure when facing changes. Moreover, even for the worker, they are not open to recognize the difficulties and release pressure during the integration as some workers think that social worker should be strong……therefore, such kinds of software are not developed well, the result of integration must have many aspects to be improved as our presentation mention
Service delivery is confused and do not have a clear guild line.
-sometimes other agency transfer case to IFSC which they think that IFSC has one-stop service
-however there is limitation in service delivery
-misunderstanding arise between IFSC and other agency
-it is time consuming to struggle between the event
-and affect the service delivery towards client
Conclusion
To conclude, the rationale of IFSC deserves us to promote and support.
Because…. It is more efficient for the service users to search and
use the service when practicing the one-stop service. The service users can save more time in the service use. The service can be centralized in one district that the service users can be more convenient to use different kinds of services at the same time.
The service duplication can be decreased after practicing the one-stop service that the service user can receive a more effective and congruent service (a better support and intervention from the social worker).
Despite the fact that agencies and social workers are facing the changes brought by integration, they are also facing the challenges brought by lump-sum grant and funding services agreement (F.S.A.):
Front line social workers need more time and resources for adapting the changes
More resources should be allocated to agencies so as to provide spaces for front line social workers to receive further training and support
To cope with the diversifying and ever-changing needs of clients, concerning parties should go through the carrying out and implementation of integration services in details as well as do more research on the influence towards social service agencies brought by integration so that the aim of services, “provide effective support for people in need in society” could be achieved.
References 社會福利諮詢委員會會議記錄 2003 年 10 月 28 日
http://www.hwfb.gov.hk/cn/committees/swac/minutes031028_c.htm
剖析服務綜合化http://www.hkcs.org/info/cnews/c224/c224_11.htm
家庭服務檢討之回應二 (探討服務目標、服務策劃及整合家庭服務模式 )
游達裕 朱志強 林嘉麗 黃美菁http://swforum.socialnet.org.hk/article/001112.htm
鄭麗玲 . (2002). 一切由「綜合」開始—東涌新體驗 . 社聯季刊 . 香港 : 香港社會服務聯會 .