Southwest Renewable Energy Transmission Conference
May 21, 2010
Jeff MechenbierDirector Transmission & Distribution Planning and Contracts
Barriers to Development of Interstate Transmission For Renewable Generation
Few PPAs are being inked, projects are very slow to move forward with signed agreements
No Clear Federal Policy on RES, Cost Allocation, Siting
State regulators limit cost recovery to transmission that benefits state jurisdictional utility customers
Inconsistent State RPS policies –West wide REC Trading cumbersome
In-State preferences for renewable energy development
Lead time for transmission is much longer than generation development
Poor economics due to low capacity factor of renewable resources and high incremental cost of new transmission
Existing FERC Pro forma generation interconnection procedures are inefficient
Sequential processing results in suboptimal expansion plan for transmission system
Developer decisions “in process” at each offramp impact projects behind them in the queue. Restudies paralyze the process.
Interconnection does not result in deliverability. The process for interconnection is a different business line from the delivery business. FERC regulations do not allow utilities to combine them.
Non-viable projects clogging queue
How Best to Collaborate?
State and Federal agencies need to establish clearly defined transmission corridors to minimize ROW and permitting hurdles for renewable energy zones.
Collaboration needs to begin at the federal/state level to address conflicting goals of governments. Federal and state policies are not aiming at the same targets.
States need to establish standard renewable products to allow for trading of RECs.
Pricing Policy needs to allow for rational grid expansion to ensure costs are equitably shared.
Transmission is a regional issue - All stakeholders in the region need to cooperate in solution (Continue regional transmission provider sponsored transmission group collaboration).
Top Related