SOFT GAMMA REPEATERS
Kevin Hurley
UC Berkeley
Space Sciences Laboratory
SOFT GAMMA REPEATERS AN OBSERVATIONAL REVIEW
Kevin HurleyUC BerkeleySpace Sciences [email protected]
THE SOFT GAMMA REPEATERS ARE SPORADIC SOURCES OF BURSTS
• SGRs can remain dormant for many years; during these periods, no bursting behavior is observed
• They become active and emit bursts at apparently random times
• Two common types of bursts:
– Short (100 ms, up to 1041 erg s-1)
– Giant flares (several hundred seconds, periodic emission, up to 1046 erg s-1)
BURSTING ACTIVITY OF 3 SGRs OVER 17 YEARS
1992 1996 2000 2004 2008YEAR
0
20
40
60
800
20
40
600
20
40
60
80
SGR1806-20
SGR1900+14
SGR1627-41
BU
RS
TS
PE
R 1
0 D
AY
INT
ER
VA
L
0 10 20 30 40 50 60TIME, SECONDS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
CO
UN
TS
/32
ms.
ULYSSESSGR1900+1425-150 keV980530A
SINGLE, ~100 ms LONG BURST (MOST COMMON)
TWO SGR GIANT FLARES
5.16 s period
7.56 s period
50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0TIME, s.
103
104
105
CO
UN
TS
/0.5
s
SGR1900+14
AUGUST 27 1998
ULYSSES
25-150 keV
0 100 200 300 400Tim e, s
10
100
1000
10000
Co
un
ts/0
.5 s
SGR1806-20DECEMBER 27, 2004
RHESSI20-100 keV
SGR1900+14AUGUST 27 1998
ULYSSES25-150 keV
Eγ=4x1044 erg
SGR1806-20DECEMBER 27, 2005
RHESSI20-100 keV
Eγ=8x1045 erg
Three phases:
1) Fast rise (<1 ms)
2) Very intense initial spike, ~100 ms long
3) Periodic decay (~300 s)
GIANT SGR FLARES ARE SPECTACULAR!
• Occur perhaps every 30 years on a given SGR
• Second only to supernovae in intensity
• Intense (Eγ≳1046 erg at the source, 1 erg/cm2 at Earth)
• Very hard energy spectra (up to >10 MeV)
• Create transient radio nebulae
• Cause dramatic ionospheric disturbances
• Should be detectable in nearby galaxies
SHORT BURST ENERGY SPECTRA, 2-150 keV: SUM OF TWO BLACKBODIES, kT=3.4 and 9.3 keV
(SGR1900+14, Feroci et al. 2004)
BeppoSAX MECSkT=3.4 keV
BeppoSAX PDSkT=9.3 keV
R= 14 km at 10 kpc R=2 km at 10 kpc
0 100 200 300 400Time, s
10
100
1000
10000
Co
un
ts/0
.5 s
1
10
100
kT
, keV
SGR1806-20 GIANT FLARERHESSI
SPECTRAL TEMPERATURE
GIANT FLARE ENERGY SPECTRUM: 175 keV BLACKBODY, THEN 10 keV BLACKBODY
101 102 103
ENERGY, keV
10 -1
100
101
102
103
104
105
FL
UX
, ph
oto
ns
/cm
2s
ke
V
SMALL BURST
GIANT FLARE
THE SGRs ARE QUIESCENT X AND γ-RAY SOURCES
• Luminosities: 1034 – 1036 erg/s (>spin-down energy)
• This quiescent component varies slowly, and exhibits pulsations (~10-20% pulsed fraction)
QUIESCENT X-RAY SOURCE ASSOCIATED WITH SGR1806-20
ASCA, 2-10 keV INTEGRAL-IBIS, 18-60 keV10-11 erg cm-2 s-1 10-10 erg cm-2 s-1
QUIESCENT X-RAY FLUX LEVEL IS RELATED TO THE BURSTING ACTIVITY
Bursts and quiescent emission are probably both related to magnetic stresses on the surface of the neutron star
GIANT FLARE
SGR1806-20Woods et al. 2006
P and P-dot FROM QUIESCENT SOFT X-RAYS (2-10 keV)
SGR1900 (P=5.16 s, P=10-10 s/s) SGR1806 (P=7.48 s, P~10-10 s/s)
Kouveliotou et al. 1998
Woods et al. 2000Woods et al. 1999
Hurley et al. 1999
8x10-11 s/s10-10 s/s
. .
SPINDOWN IS IRREGULAR, SOMETIMES RELATED TO BURSTING ACTIVITY, SOMETIMES NOT RELATED
(Woods et al. 2002, 2006)
SGR1900+14Woods et al. 2006
GIANT FLARE
This argues against accretion as the cause of the bursts
BROADBAND QUIESCENT X-RAY SPECTRA Blackbody < 10 keV, Power Law > 20 keV
Götz et al. 2006
SGRs
AXPs
MAGNETARS COMPARED TO OTHER NS: P-P DIAGRAM
SGRs,AXPs
High BRadio
Pulsars
RadioPulsars
MillisecondRadio
Pulsars
V. Kaspi 2006
.
ESSENTIAL SGR PROPERTIES
Giant Flare?
P s
. P s/s
1-10 keV luminosity
erg/s
B, Gauss
1/2
62
.3
R8PIP3c
SGR1806-20 Dec 27 2004
7.46 ~10-10 2x1035
8x1014
SGR1900+14 Aug 27
1998 5.16 ~10-10 3x1034
2-8x1014
SGR0525-66
Mar 5 1979
8 ~7x10-11 1036 7x1014
SGR1627-41 No 2.6 1.2x10-11 1035
2x1014
SGR0501+45 No 5.8 5x10-12 1034 1014
1E1547-5408* No 2.1 2.3x10-11 1033 2.2x1014
*initially thought to be an AXP
HOSTS AND PROGENITORS
• One or two SGRs are probably in supernova remnants
• One SGR may have been ejected from its supernova remnant
• Two SGRs are probably in massive star clusters
• The SNR association implies a normal progenitor mass (~5-8 M)
• The massive cluster association implies a massive progenitor (~50M)
THE SGR-SNR CONNECTION
• SGR0525-66 is almost certainly in the N49 SNR in the LMC
• 1E1547-5408 lies within the radio SNR G327.24-0.13
• SGR0501-4516 may have been ejected from its supernova remnant
MASSIVE CLUSTER-SGR ASSOCIATIONS
SGR1900+14
• ~13 stars
• 1-10 Myr old
(Vrba et al. 2000)
SGR1806-20
• ~12 stars
• 3-5 Myr old
• SGR progenitor mass ~48M
(Fuchs et al. 1999; Bibby et al. 2008)
COUNTERPARTS
• Two SGRs exhibited transient radio nebulae after giant flares
• One SGR has a persistent radio counterpart
• One SGR has a variable NIR counterpart
SGRs ARE TRANSIENT RADIO SOURCES AFTER GIANT FLARES: RADIO NEBULA CREATED BY GIANT FLARE FROM
SGR1806-20 (Taylor et al. 2005)
VLA
THIS RADIO EMISSION COMES FROM AN EXPANDING CLOUDOF RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS ACCELERATED IN THE MAGNETOSPHERE
AND EXPELLED. BUT SGRs ARE NOT OBSERVABLE QUIESCENT RADIO SOURCES
SGR1806-20 IS INVISIBLE IN THE OPTICAL (nH~6x1022 cm-2), BUT IT IS JUST BARELY VISIBLE IN THE INFRARED
m K’ =22
Kosugi et al. 2005
This is the only optical or IR counterpart to an SGR so far
Israel et al. 2005
mKs=20
10″ 1.5″
IR FLUX IS NOT AN EXTRAPOLATION OF HIGH ENERGY QUIESCENT FLUX
• But the IR flux varies with the quiescent flux and/or with bursting activity
Israel et al. 2005
IR X-γ
ESSENTIAL SGR PROPERTIES
Radio
Counterpart
NIR
Counterpart
X-ray
Counterpart
Host Progenitor
SGR1806-20 After giant flare
(transient) Yes Yes
Massive star cluster?
48M
SGR1900+14 After giant flare
(transient) No Yes
Massive star cluster?
Massive Star?
SGR0525-66 No No Yes SNR ?
SGR1627-41 No No Yes ? ?
SGR0501+45 No Maybe Yes SNR? ?
1E1547-5408 Yes No Yes SNR ?
HOW MANY SGRs ARE THERE?
• 5 or 6 confirmed SGRs (depending on 1E1547)
• Three unconfirmed SGRs: 1801-23, 1808-20, GRB050925
• Some short GRBs could be extragalactic giant magnetar flares
• Muno et al. (2008) estimated <540 in the galaxy, based on Chandra, XMM data
CONCLUSIONS
• There is good evidence that the known SGRs are magnetars
• There is growing evidence that the members of the magnetar family (AXPs and SGRs) are very similar to one another
SGRs AND AXPs OBSERVATIONAL PROPERTIES COMPARED
SGRs AXPs
Small Bursts Frequent Rare
Giant Flares Yes No
Quiescent X-rays Yes, to >100 keV Yes, to >100 keV
Radio emission Following giant flares only
1-2 cases known, transient
Periods 5 – 8 s 2 – 11 s
Spindown .5 – 20 × 10-11 s/s 0.05 – 20 × 10-11 s/s
Hosts Massive star clusters? SNRs?
• In 1992, Duncan and Thompson, and Paczyński, independently proposed that neutron stars with large magnetic fields could explain SGR bursts and giant flares
• In 1995, Thompson and Duncan expanded their model to explain the AXPs
• Duncan and Thompson called these neutron stars magnetars
• Motivation:
– High B low opacity, so L>>LEddington is allowed
– High B neutron star magnetosphere can contain the energy of the radiating electrons in a giant flare
– High B causes rapid spindown of newly born pulsar – in the case of SGR0525, the age of the SNR is 10,000 y, and the period is 8 s
– High B is a reservoir of energy to power the quiescent emission and the bursts
MAGNETARS
• Definition: a neutron star in which the magnetic field, rather than rotation, provides the main source of free energy; the decaying field powers electromagnetic radiation (R. Duncan & C. Thompson, 1992; C. Thompson & R. Duncan, 1995, 1996)
• Note that the definition does not specify the magnetic field strength
• To explain SGRs and AXPs, however, B must be greater than the quantum critical value 4.4 x 1013 G, where the energy between electron Landau levels equals their rest mass
• Some AXPs and SGRs require B~1015 Gauss, so these magnetars have the strongest cosmic magnetic fields that we know of in the universe
ORIGIN OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD
• Unknown, but there are two hypotheses:
1. Fossil field: massive (25 M) progenitor star’s field (104 G or more) is amplified during core collapse and frozen into highly conducting compact remnant (the neutron star). Initial period of neutron star is 4-10 ms, too slow for a dynamo to operate efficiently.
2. Dynamo amplification: field is generated by convective dynamo in the proto-neutron star. Initial period is 1-3 ms.
• These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive
MAKING A MAGNETAR WITH A DYNAMO(Duncan & Thompson 1992)
• A neutron star undergoes vigorous convection in the first ~30 s after its formation
• Coupled with rapid rotation (~1 ms period), this makes the neutron star a likely site for dynamo action
• If the rotation period is less than the convective overturn time, magnetic field amplification is possible
• In principle, B ~ 3 x 1017 G can be generated (magnetic field energy should not exceed the binding energy of a neutron star, so B<5 x 1018 G)
• Differential rotation and magnetic braking quickly slow the period down to the 5-10 s range
• Magnetic diffusion and dissipation create hot spots on the neutron star surface, which cause the star to be a quiescent, periodic X-ray source
• The strong magnetic field stresses the iron surface of the star, to which it is anchored
• The surface undergoes localized cracking, shaking the field lines and creating Alfvèn waves, which accelerate electrons to ~100 keV; they radiate their energy in short (100 ms) bursts with energies 1040 – 1041 erg (magnitude 19.5 crustquake)
• There is enough energy to power bursting activity for 104 y
NEUTRON STAR
B≈1015 G
Thompson & Duncan 1995
• Localized cracking can’t relieve all the stress, which continues to build
• Over decades, the built-up stress ruptures the surface of the star profoundly – a magnitude 23.2 starquake
• Magnetic field lines annihilate, filling the magnetosphere with MeV electrons
• Initial spike in the giant flare is radiation from the entire magnetosphere (>1014 G required to contain electrons)
• Periodic component comes from the surface of the neutron star
THE STATISTICS OF SHORT SGR BURSTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE MAGNETAR MODEL
• Burst durations
• Distribution of the time between bursts
• Number-Intensity relation for short bursts
STATISTICS:DISTRIBUTION OF SHORT BURST DURATIONS
(Gogus et al. 2001)
LOGNORMAL LOGNORMAL
STATISTICS:DISTRIBUTION OF THE TIME BETWEEN BURSTS
RXTESGR1900
Gogus et al. 1999
LOGNORMAL
SGR1900+14Gogus et al. 1999
STATISTICS:NUMBER-INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION
Götz et al. 2006
POWER LAW
STATISTICSDISTRIBUTIONS OF SGR PROPERTIES
• Lognormal duration and waiting time distributions, and power law number-intensity distribution, are consistent with:
• Self-organized criticality (Gogus et al. 2000)
– system (neutron star crust) evolves to a critical state due to a driving force (magnetic stress)
– slight perturbation can cause a chain reaction of any size, leading to a short burst of arbitrary size (but not a giant flare)
• A set of independent relaxation systems (Palmer 1999)
– Multiple, independent sites on the neutron star accumulate energy
– Sudden releases of accumulated energy
OUTLINE
• History• SGRs
1. Bursts– X-and γ-ray time histories, giant flares, QPO’s – X-ray afterglows– energy spectra, lines2. Quiescent emission in X- and γ-rays
• AXPs• Interpretation of the data• Data at other wavelengths: radio, optical• Non-electromagnetic emissions: gravitational radiation• Magnetar locations: SNRs, massive clusters• Magnetar census• Terrestrial effects of giant flares• Extragalactic magnetars• The latest news (SGR0501, AXP 1E1547)
AXPs
• At least 4 AXPs have optical/IR counterparts
• All have an IR excess with respect to an extrapolation of their X-ray blackbody spectra
• One or two AXPs display transient, pulsed radio emission
OUTLINE
• History• SGRs
1. Bursts– X-and γ-ray time histories, giant flares, QPO’s – X-ray afterglows– energy spectra, lines2. Quiescent emission in X- and γ-rays
• AXPs• Interpretation of the data• Data at other wavelengths: radio, optical• Non-electromagnetic emissions: gravitational radiation• Magnetar locations: SNRs, massive clusters• Magnetar census• Terrestrial effects of giant flares• Extragalactic magnetars• The latest news (SGR0501, AXP 1E1547)
• Magnetars may be deformed during bursts and especially during giant flares
• QPOs may be evidence of this deformation
• It follows that they may be sources of gravitational radiation
LIGO LIMITS ON GRAVITATIONAL RADIATION
• Upper limit to GR from GRB070201, an SGR giant flare in M31 (Abbott et al. 2008)
• Search for GR from SGR0501 bursts is in progress
OUTLINE
• History• SGRs
1. Bursts– X-and γ-ray time histories, giant flares, QPO’s– X-ray afterglows– energy spectra, lines2. Quiescent emission in X- and γ-rays
• AXPs• Interpretation of the data• Data at other wavelengths: radio, optical• Non-electromagnetic emissions: gravitational radiation• Magnetar locations: SNRs, massive clusters• Magnetar census• Terrestrial effects of giant flares• Extragalactic magnetars• The latest news (SGR0501, AXP 1E1547)
BUT SGR1900+14 IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SNR G42.8+0.6!
If the SGR originated in the SNR, a proper motion of 110 mas/yr is implied
DeLuca et al. (2008) have set an upper limit to the proper motion using 5 years of Chandra data: < 70 mas/yr
SGR1900
AXPs
• 3 or 4 AXPs are at the geometrical centers of SNRs
• Implied proper motions are small, and these associations are considered to be likely
• 1 AXP is in the cluster Westerlund 1
OUTLINE
• History• SGRs
1. Bursts– X-and γ-ray time histories, giant flares, QPO’s – X-ray afterglows– energy spectra, lines2. Quiescent emission in X- and γ-rays
• AXPs• Interpretation of the data• Data at other wavelengths: radio, optical• Non-electromagnetic emissions: gravitational radiation• Magnetar locations: SNRs, massive clusters• Magnetar census• Terrestrial effects of giant flares• Extragalactic magnetars• The latest news (SGR0501, AXP 1E1547)
OUTLINE
• History• SGRs
1. Bursts– X-and γ-ray time histories, giant flares, QPO’s– X-ray afterglows– energy spectra, lines2. Quiescent emission in X- and γ-rays
• AXPs• Interpretation of the data• Data at other wavelengths: radio, optical• Non-electromagnetic emissions: gravitational radiation• Magnetar locations: SNRs, massive clusters• Magnetar census• Terrestrial effects of giant flares• Extragalactic magnetars• The latest news (SGR0501, AXP 1E1547)
GIANT FLARES TURN NIGHT INTO DAY!
Inan et al. 1999
Level of the ionosphere as measured by propagation ofVLF signal from Hawaii (21.4 kHz) descends to daytimevalue, due to ionization by 3-10 keV X-rays at 30-90 km
Effect of the giant flare of 1998 August 27 from SGR1900+14
THE GIANT FLARE FROM SGR1806-20
• The most intense solar or cosmic transient ever observed
• X- and gamma-ray energy released at the source: 3x1046 erg
• Measured X- and gamma-ray flux at the top of the atmosphere: 1.4 erg/cm2
• This should be considered a lower limit to the energy released (saturation effects, limited energy ranges)
• It would require ~106 erg/cm2 absorbed by the atmosphere (a giant flare at 15 pc) to cause an effect similar to “nuclear winter” (ozone depletion, destruction of the food chain)
• To cause damage to the biosphere, SGR1806-20 would have to be about 16000 times closer, at the distance of the nearest stars
• Probability: 10-6
OUTLINE
• History• SGRs
1. Bursts– X-and γ-ray time histories, giant flares, QPO’s– X-ray afterglows– energy spectra, lines2. Quiescent emission in X- and γ-rays
• AXPs• Interpretation of the data• Data at other wavelengths: radio, optical• Non-electromagnetic emissions: gravitational radiation• Magnetar locations: SNRs, massive clusters• Magnetar census• Terrestrial effects of giant flares• Extragalactic magnetars• The latest news (SGR0501, AXP 1E1547)
ARE SOME SHORT GRBs ACTUALLY MAGNETAR FLARES IN NEARBY GALAXIES?
GIANT FLARE FROM SGR1806-20RHESSI DATA
•Giant flare begins with ~0.2 s long, hard spectrum spike
•The spike is followed by a pulsating tail with ~1/1000th of the energy
•Viewed from a large distance, only the initial spike would be visible
•It would resemble a short GRB
•It could be detected out to 100 Mpc
•Some short GRBs are almost certainly giant magnetar flares, but how many?
0 100 200 300 400Tim e, s
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Co
un
ts/0
.5 s
0 100 200 300 400Tim e, s
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Co
un
ts/0
.5 s 6 7 8 9 10
TIME, s
20
40
60
80
CO
UN
TS
/0.0
64
S
GRB051103 – A POSSIBLE EXTRAGALACTIC GIANT MAGNETAR FLARE FROM M81 (3.6 Mpc)
IPN ErrorEllipse
M81
M82
Swift BAT15-150 keV
(Not imaged)
Eγ=7x1046 ergFrederiks et al. 2007
GRB070201 – A POSSIBLE EXTRAGALACTIC MAGNETAR FLARE FROM M31 (780 kpc)
-400 -200 0 200 400TIME, MILLISECONDS
0
40
80
120
CO
UN
TS
/2 m
s.
KONUS-W INDGRB0702012 ms. DATA
IPN ErrorBox
M31
Eγ=1.5x1045 erg
LIGO measurements indicate that this could not have been a binary merger in M31 (Abbott et al. 2008)
Mazets et al. 2008
5 GIANT FLARE ENERGIES
Assumed distance, kpc Eγ, erg
SGR1900+14
August 27 1998
15 4x1044
SGR0525-66
March 5 1979
55 7x1044
SGR0044+42 (M31)
February 1 2007
780 (M31) 1.5x1045
SGR1806-20
December 27 2004
8.7 8x1045
SGR0952+69 (M81)
November 3 2005
3600 (M81) 7x1046
OUTLINE
• History• SGRs
1. Bursts– X-and γ-ray time histories, giant flares, QPO’s – X-ray afterglows– energy spectra, lines2. Quiescent emission in X- and γ-rays
• AXPs• Interpretation of the data• Data at other wavelengths: radio, optical• Non-electromagnetic emissions: gravitational radiation• Magnetar locations: SNRs, massive clusters• Magnetar census• Terrestrial effects of giant flares• Extragalactic magnetars• The latest news (SGR0501, AXP 1E1547)
INTEGRAL-IBIS IMAGE OF THE QUIESCENT EMISSION FROM SGR0501
JOINT FIT TO THE QUIESCENT SPECTRUM WITH XMM AND INTEGRAL DATA (2BB+PL)
N. Rea et al., 2009
SGR 0501+4516
PL indices of the hard tails:
0.95
3.1±0.5
1.5-1.9
0.73±0.17
1.46± 0.21
0.94±0.16
Götz et al. 2006
Rea et al. 2009
Different spectral shapes below and above 10 keV different emission mechanisms⇒
AXP 1E1547-5408: THE INTEGRAL SPI-ACS BURST ZOO
-8 -4 0 4 8 12TIME, S
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
1E1547-5408JANUARY 22 2009
13838 S.
-8 -4 0 4 8 12TIME, S
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
1E1547-5408JANUARY 22 2009
10016 S.
0 20 40TIME, S
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
1E1547-5408JANUARY 22 2009
19068 S.
0 20 40 60TIME, S
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
1E1547-5408JANUARY 22 2009
24456 S.
• 1E1547 was initially classified as an AXP
• But the bursts from 1E1547 are SGR-like
• Two possibilities
– 1E1547 was incorrectly classified; it’s really an SGR
– SGRs and AXPs are really the same type of object
Chandra-INTEGRAL Spectrum of 1E1547(Courtesy G.L. Israel)
OPEN QUESTIONS
• What is the number-intensity relation for giant magnetar flares?
• What is the SGR birth rate and lifetime?
• What is the progenitor magnetic field?
• What kind of supernova produces an SGR? Why can’t we detect its remnant?
• How are AXPs different from SGRs?
• Are some high-B radio pulsars actually like magnetars?
• How is the high energy tail of the quiescent component generated?
BUT…WHAT IF THEY’RE NOT MAGNETARS?
• Fallback accretion disk
• Phase transitions in strange stars
AND LOCATION
• SGR0525-66 lies in the direction of the N49 SNR in the LMC
• This association has been controversial since March 6 1979
• Important to resolve, because– it is the only unobscured SGR,
and– if the SGR is in N49, it is the only
SGR with an accurately known distance and age;
• HST measurements reveal no optical counterpart (Kaplan et al. 2001); accretion disk ruled out
• Chandra measurements indicate that the quiescent X-ray spectrum resembles that of an AXP, suggesting that the neutron star may be intermediate between and SGR and an AXP
SHOULD YOU BUY A MAGNETAR SHELTER?(WORST CASE CALCULATION)
• Say each giant flare releases 3x1046 erg
• ~106 erg/cm2 absorbed by the atmosphere (a giant flare at 15 pc) would cause an effect similar to “nuclear winter” (ozone depletion, destruction of the food chain)
• Assume magnetars are distributed uniformly throughout the disk of the galaxy (900 kpc3), and that ~10 are active at any given time
• Probability ~ 10-6
LOCATIONS OF THE FOUR KNOWN SGRS
SGR 1806-20 SGR 1900+14
SGR0525-66
N49LMC
SGR1627-41
Magnetars are young objects
MAGNETAR LOCATIONS IN THE GALAXYMAGNETAR LOCATIONS IN THE GALAXY
sMM
M
M
M
M
MM
MMMM
M
MM
M
YOU ARE HERE
M M MM MM M M MM M M M MM
MAGNETAR LOCATIONS IN THE GALAXY
⇒MAGNETARS ARE YOUNG OBJECTS
SGR1806-20 DISTANCE ESTIMATES
4 8 12 16 20DISTANCE TO SGR1806-20, kpc
Bibby et al. 2008
Figer et al. 2004
Eikenberry et al. &Corbel & Eikenberry 2004
Cameron et al. 2005
McClure-Griffiths & Gaensler 2005
Corbel et al. 1997 Mol. Clouds
HI abs.
HI abs.
LBV
LBV
Spectroscopy8.7 kpc
DUST RING AROUND SGR1900+14
• If the SGR is at the distance of the massive cluster, the August 27 1998 giant flare could have created a dust-free cavity
• The ring would be illuminated by the stars in the cluster
Wachter et al. 2008 Spitzer observation
SGR1900+14 DISTANCE ESTIMATES
0 4 8 12 16DISTANCE TO SGR1900+14, kpc
Vasisht et al. 1994
Vrba et al. 1999Supergiant stars
G42.8+0.6
13.5 kpc
NUMBER-INTENSITY RELATION FOR 5 GIANT SGR FLARES*
*not to be taken too seriously
1 0 4 4 1 0 4 5 1 0 4 6 1 0 4 7
E , e r g
0
2
4
6
N(>
E)
HOW TO ANSWER THEM
• More detailed theory
• More sensitive instruments, longer observation times
• Another 30 years of data
THE GIANT FLARE FROM SGR1806-20
• December 27 2004 21:30:26 UT
• SGR1806-20 was over longitude 146.2º W, latitude +20.4º (near Hawaii)
• Detected by at least 24 spacecraft (and probably numerous military spacecraft) – most of which had no X- or gamma-ray detectors!
• The most intense solar or cosmic transient ever observed
• Measured X- and gamma-ray flux at the top of the atmosphere: 1.4 erg/cm2
• X- and gamma-ray energy released at the source: 3x1046 erg
• This should be considered a lower limit to the energy released (saturation effects, limited energy ranges)
A FEW NUMBERS FOR COMPARISON
• Peak luminosity: 2x1047 erg/s
– Peak luminosity of all the stars in the Galaxy: 8.7x1043
• Total energy released: 3x1046 erg in ~ 1 second
– =300,000 years of the sun’s energy output
– =8x1018 times the yearly world energy consumption
– =8x1019 times the energy in the world’s nuclear arsenal
• But the dose outside the Earth’s atmosphere, 0.14 rem, was roughly equivalent to a medical X-ray
• To cause damage to the biosphere, SGR1806-20 would have to be about 16000 times closer, at the distance of the nearest stars
SHOULD YOU BUY A MAGNETAR SHELTER?(WORST CASE CALCULATION)
• Say each giant flare releases 3x1046 erg
• ~106 erg/cm2 absorbed by the atmosphere (a giant flare at 15 pc) would cause an effect similar to “nuclear winter” (ozone depletion, destruction of the food chain)
• Assume magnetars are distributed uniformly throughout the disk of the galaxy (900 kpc3), and that ~10 are active at any given time
• Probability ~ 10-6
GIANT SGR FLARES ARE SPECTACULAR!
• Occur perhaps every 30 years on a given SGR
• Intense (3x1046 erg at the source, 1 erg/cm2 at Earth), ~5 minute long bursts of X- and gamma-rays with very hard energy spectra (up to several MeV at least)
• Are modulated with the neutron star periodicity
• Create transient radio nebulae, dramatic ionospheric disturbances
• Display fast oscillations which provide a clue to the structure of the neutron star
LESS WELL KNOWN SGR PROPERTIES
Name PossibleSNRAssociation
Distance,kpc
Age,kyr
MassiveStarCluster?
SGR1806-20 G10.0-0.3 6 - 15 ? Yes
SGR1900+14 G42.8+0.6 5 - 15 5 - 20 Yes
SGR0525-66 N49 55 10 No
SGR1627-41 G337.0-0.1 6-11 1-5 No
THE GIANT FLARE FROM SGR1806-20
• December 27 2004 21:30:26 UT
• SGR1806-20 was over longitude 146.2º W, latitude +20.4º (near Hawaii)
• Detected by at least 24 spacecraft (and probably numerous military spacecraft) – most of which had no X- or gamma-ray detectors!
• The most intense solar or cosmic transient ever observed
• Measured X- and gamma-ray flux at the top of the atmosphere: 1.4 erg/cm2
• X- and gamma-ray energy released at the source: 3x1046 erg
• This should be considered a lower limit to the energy released (saturation effects, limited energy ranges)
A FEW NUMBERS FOR COMPARISON
• Peak luminosity: 2x1047 erg/s
– Peak luminosity of all the stars in the Galaxy: 8.7x1043
• Total energy released: 3x1046 erg in ~ 1 second
– =300,000 years of the sun’s energy output
– =8x1018 times the yearly world energy consumption
– =8x1019 times the energy in the world’s nuclear arsenal
• But the dose outside the Earth’s atmosphere, 0.14 rem, was roughly equivalent to a medical X-ray
• To cause damage to the biosphere, SGR1806-20 would have to be about 16000 times closer, at the distance of the nearest stars
SHOULD YOU BUY A MAGNETAR SHELTER?(WORST CASE CALCULATION)
• Say each giant flare releases 3x1046 erg
• ~106 erg/cm2 absorbed by the atmosphere (a giant flare at 15 pc) would cause an effect similar to “nuclear winter” (ozone depletion, destruction of the food chain)
• Assume magnetars are distributed uniformly throughout the disk of the galaxy (900 kpc3), and that ~10 are active at any given time
• Probability ~ 10-6
IS SGR1900+14 ASSOCIATED WITH A HISTORICAL SUPERNOVA? (Wang, Li, and Zhao 2002)
• “During the 3rd month of the 3rd year of Jian-Ping in the period of the king of Han Ai (4 BC, April), a po star was seen near He-Gu”
• Similar description is found in Korean records
• “po” star had m~5
• In this direction, m=5 corresponds to M=-21; possibly a hypernova
R. Mallozzi, 1998
• On August 22, 2008, SGR0501+4516 awoke from a long sleep and became burst-active
• The first detection was by the Swift BAT
• This was the first new SGR to be confirmed in 10 years
• Many ToO observations were called (AGILE, Chandra, INTEGRAL, RXTE, Suzaku, Swift, XMM)
• We activated our INTEGRAL AO-6 ToO program on August 27, and observed the source for about 200 ksec
• We detected the quiescent emission, and four weak bursts
22-A
ug
-08
23-A
ug
-08
24-A
ug
-08
25-A
ug
-08
26-A
ug
-08
27-A
ug
-08
28-A
ug
-08
29-A
ug
-08
30-A
ug
-08
31-A
ug
-08
1-S
ep-0
82-
Sep
-08
3-S
ep-0
8
0
10
20
30
OB
SE
RV
ED
BU
RS
TS
PE
R D
AY
*
SUZAKUXMM
XRTXRT
INTEGRAL
CHANDRAXTE
*OBSERVATIONS BY KONUS-W IND, RHESSI, INTEGRAL-IBIS, SW IFT, SUZAKU XIS, AGILE,
AND FERMI GBM
SGR0501+4516
ToO OBSERVATIONS
TIMELINES OF BURSTING ACTIVITY AND TOO OBSERVATIONS
August 27 2008 16:25
20-40 keV
40-100 keV
100-300 keV
BURST #1
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
20-40 keV
40-100 keV
100-300 keV
August 27 2008 22:26
BURST #2
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
20-40 keV
40-100 keV
100-300 keV
August 28 2008 03:32
BURST #3
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
20-40 keV
40-100 keV
100-300 keV
August 28 2008 20:59
BURST #4
CO
UN
TS
/50
ms
BURST PARAMETERS
Duration,
ms
Fluence,
erg cm-2
Peak flux,
erg cm-2 s-1 (50 ms)
kT, keV
(OTTB)
August 27 16:25 150 6.6x10-9 4.8x10-8 ---
August 27 22:25 200 4.8x10-8 8.4x10-8 ---
August 28 03:32 200 3x10-8 1.4x10-7 28
August 28 20:59 50 2x10-8 3x10-7 33
These bursts are very weak; spectraare typical for SGR bursts
Spectrum of August 28 20:59 burst
OTTB fitkT=33 keV
SUMMARY
• INTEGRAL-IBIS ToO observation of SGR0501+4516 was successful
• 4 weak bursts were detected. The spectra of two of them were typical of SGR bursts; the other two were too weak for analysis
• Quiescent emission was detected up to 100 keV; flux was 4x10-11 erg cm-2 s-1, 18-100 keV, a typical number for SGRs
• XMM/INTEGRAL spectrum indicates a rising νFν spectrum above 10 keV with a hard power law, which is fairly typical of magnetars
“STRANGE” BURSTS, 1000 TIMES LONGER (RARE)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15TIME, SECONDS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
CO
UN
TS
/32
ms
ULYSSESSGR1627-41JULY 2, 200125-150 keV
INTERMEDIATE DURATION BURSTS (RARE)
INTERMEDIATE BURST ENERGY SPECTRUM:SUM OF TWO BLACKBODIES, kT=4.3 and 9.8 keV
(SGR1900+14, Olive et al. 2004)
HETE WXM HETE FREGATE
NO GLITCH AT THE TIME OF THE SGR1806-20 GIANT FLARE
HOW MANY ARE THERE?
• When they burst normally in gamma-rays, they are bright enough to detect anywhere in the galaxy
• When they don’t, you can detect them as quiescent X-ray sources, but you have to know exactly where to look
• Long periods (decades) with no bursts possible hidden galactic SGRs
• Muno et al. (2008) estimated <540 based on Chandra, XMM data
Top Related