7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
1/180
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
2/180
SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF FLUVIAL AND LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS INTHE LOWER PART OF THE CHINLE FORMATION, SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH,
UNITED STATES: PALEOCLIMATIC AND TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS
A THESISSUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTABY
Joseph John Beer
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OFMASTER OF SCIENCE
December 2005
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
3/180
Copyright Joseph John Beer 2005
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
4/180
ABSTRACT
Field and well log data from central Utah identify three sequence bounding
unconformities in the lower portion of the Chinle (Shinarump, Monitor Butte, Temple
Mountain, and Moss Back Members) which function to divide these deposits into
three periods of incision and subsequent valley fill. The initial period of degradation
is marked by interfluve paleosols and truncation of the underlying Moenkopi
Formation creating a paleovalley which constrains the deposition of these four
members. The first paleovalley fill, represented by the Shinarump Member, is
interpreted as a confined sandy low-sinuosity river system. A second period of
incision is marked by truncation of the Shinarump and correlative paleosols and
pedogenically modified strata. The Monitor Butte and correlative Temple Mountain
Members overlie this unconformity and consist of mudstones and sandstones
representing fluvio-lacustrine deposition and vertisols and interbedded mudstones and
sandstones deposited in a high-sinuosity river system. A final cut-and-fill cycle within
the pre-Shinarump paleovalley is filled by the high- and low-sinuosity fluvial deposits
of the Moss Back Member. Truncation of the Monitor Butte and Temple Mountain
Members and the Moenkopi Fm. and interfluve pedogenesis mark the preceding
surface of degradation.
Erosional unconformities and correlative extensive pedogenesis within the
Chinle in central Utah indicate a depositional history involving alternating periods of
landscape degradation and aggradation. The tectonic setting of the Chinle basin
within a dynamically subsiding back-arc basin may provide a mechanism for 1) uplift
and erosion of Lower Triassic strata creating the master paleovalley surface, and 2)
i
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
5/180
later subsidence of the Chinle depositional basin. The high frequency, low amplitude
cut-and-fill nature of the lower portion of the Chinle is likely the result of changes in
sediment flux and discharge as evidenced by detailed facies and pedogenic analysis,
and paleoecological and paleoclimatic data. In addition, the nature of deposition
within an incised valley network had a large effect on accommodation, and the spatial
distribution of facies preserved in the lower portion of the Chinle Formation.
ii
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
6/180
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First and foremost I wish to thank Tim Demko for the first-hand introduction
to the geology of the Colorado Plateau and for instilling within me the desire to visit
every Mesozoic outcrop preserved on the Colorado Plateau. Tims personality as well
as his interest and knowledge pertaining to the stratigraphy of the Plateau made a lack
of discussion, feedback, and encouragement an impossibility.
I also owe a large debt to both Corey Wendlund and Ryan Erickson for the
many weeks each of them spent assisting me with fieldwork. I would like to thank
Marsha Meinders-Patalke, Erik Gulbranson, and Riyad Ali-Adeeb for numerous
thoughtful discussions throughout the course of this project. I also wish to thank John
Swenson, and Julie Etterson for thoughtful comments and insights during the editing
process.
This project was funded in part thanks to the generosity of the Colorado
Scientific Society, the University of Minnesota Duluth Department of Geological
Sciences, AAPG Grants in Aid, and the University of Minnesota VDIL. Digital well
logs were provided by an educational grant from MJ Systems.
Lastly I would like to thank my wife Jenny and the rest of my friends and
family for their patience, support, and encouragement throughout the course of this
project.
iii
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
7/180
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGNATURE PAGE
TITLE PAGE
COPYRIGHT NOTICE PAGE
ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Purpose 1
1.2 Location.. 2
1.3 Methods... 5
1.3.1 Field Methods.. 5
1.3.2 Petrographic Methods 5
1.3.3 Subsurface Methods. 6
CHAPTER II: GEOLOGIC SETTING. 7
2.1 Tectonics.... 7
2.2 Stratigraphy.... 11
2.2.1 Pennsylvanian Permian. 12
2.2.2 Early Triassic 12
2.2.3 Late Triassic. 14
2.2.4 Jurassic... 22
2.3 Paleogeography.. 22
iv
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
8/180
2.4 Paleoclimate..... 25
2.5 Paleoecology... 29
CHAPTER III: DATA AND RESULTS 30
3.1 Unit Descriptions Lithology, Facies, and Architecture 30
3.1.1 Basal Unconformity... 30
3.1.2 Shinarump Member... 32
3.1.3 Post-Shinarump Unconformity. 33
3.1.4 Monitor Butte and Temple Mountain Members 34
3.1.5 Pre-Moss Back Unconformity....... 39
3.1.6 Moss Back Member... 41
3.1.7 Petrified Forest Member........................... 45
3.2 Paleocurrent Data... 47
3.3 Petrographic Data... 49
CHAPTER IV: SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY... 51
4.1 Introduction to Sequence Stratigraphy 51
4.2 Application to Continental Strata 52
4.3 Discussion of Unconformity Paleosols 55
4.4 Sequence Stratigraphic Interpretation. 57
4.4.1 Sequence Boundary 1 60
4.4.2 Depositional Sequence 1 60
4.4.3 Sequence Boundary 2 60
4.4.4 Depositional Sequence 2 61
4.4.5 Sequence Boundary 3 62
v
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
9/180
4.4.6 Depositional Sequence 3 62
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS.... 64
5.1 Depositional History... 64
5.1.1 Landscape Degradation 1 64
5.1.2 Landscape Aggradation 1.. 66
5.1.3 Landscape Degradation 2... 66
5.1.4 Landscape Aggradation 2.. 67
5.1.5 Landscape Degradation 3.. 68
5.1.6 Landscape Aggradation 3.. 68
5.2 Lithostratigraphic Implications... 70
5.2.1 Correlation of the Temple Mtn. and Monitor Butte Members.. 70
5.2.2 Suggested Modifications to Lithomember Boundaries. 70
5.3 Summary................. 76
REFERENCES CITED 77
APPENDIX I: MEASURED SECTION DATA... 86
APPENDIX II: PALEOCURRENT DATA.. 153
APPENDIX III: PETROGRAPHIC DATA... 169
vi
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
10/180
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.2-1 Distribution of Triassic outcrops on the CO Plateau 3
Figure 1.2-2 Map of the field area. 4
Figure 2.1-1 Map of the tectonic setting during the Late Triassic 9
Figure 2.2.2-1 Stratigraphy and nomenclature of the field area 11
Figure 2.2.3-1 Triassic timescale.. 16
Figure 2.2.3-2 Map depicting location of Painted Desert Paleovalley.. 18
Figure 2.3-1 Map showing location of field area during the Late Triassic... 23
Figure 2.3-2 Paleogeographic reconstructions of Late Triassic 25
Figure 3.1.1-1 Unconformity paleosol and lacustrine clinoforms near MS 27. 31
Figure 3.1.4-1 Lacustrine turbidite facies. 37
Figure 3.1.4-2 Rooted horizon in Monitor Butte Member 37
Figure 3.1.4-3 High sinuosity fluvial facies in Monitor Butte Member... 38
Figure 3.1.5-1 Pedogenic carbonate nodules from unconformity paleosol... 40
Figure 3.1.5-2 Intense bioturbation in unconformity paleosol.. 41
Figure 3.1.6-1 Aerial photograph of a portion of Blue Notch Canyon. 43
Figure 3.1.6-2 Mon. Butte, Moss Back, and Pet. Forest Mbrs. At MS 16 44
Figure 3.1.7-1 Trough cross-beds in Petrified Forest Member. 46
Figure 3.1.7-2 High sinuosity fluvial deposits in Petrified Forest Mbr 47
Figure 3.2-1 Maps depicting paleocurrent measurements 48
Figure 3.3-1 QFL diagrams of sandstones from the 3 depositional sequences. 50
Figure 4.1-1 Glossary of sequence stratigraphic terminology.. 51
Figure 4.2-1 Model depicting controls upon fluvial incision vs. aggradation.. 53
vii
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
11/180
Figure 4.2-2 Lacustrine classification scheme.. 54
Figure 4.4-1 Stratigraphic cross section of the lower portion of the Chinle Fm... 58
Figure 4.4-2 First order sequence stratigraphic framework... 59
Figure 4.4-3 Second order sequence stratigraphic framework.. 59
Figure 5.1 Schematic representation of the depositional history 65
Figure 5.2.2-1 Schematic cross sections of the lower portion of the Chinle Fm.. 74
viii
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
12/180
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The purposes of this study are to 1) place the lower part of the Chinle
Formation of central Utah into a regional depositional framework; 2) place the strata
into sequence stratigraphic context; and 3) constrain the tectonic and climatic effects
on the Late Triassic landscape. The recognition and correlation of three regional
sequence boundaries provide a temporal framework for the various depositional
facies associated with each aggradational sequence. Paleoclimatic and paleoecologic
indicators recorded within Chinle paleosols and lacustrine deposits provide
independent data to support conclusions drawn regarding possible forcing
mechanisms driving Chinle deposition. The specific objectives of this study are as
follows:
1) Describe the sedimentology, depositional facies, and large scale architecture
of the Chinle Formation exposed in south central Utah.
2) Use sequence stratigraphic methods to create a temporal framework for these
strata.
3) Collect paleoecologic data and analyze paleoclimatic indicators both within
the deposits and the paleosols in order to provide an independent, temporally
continuous paleoecologic and paleoclimatic record.
4) Interpret a detailed depositional history for these strata that includes probable
forcing mechanisms controlling Late Triassic landscape evolution.
1
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
13/180
5) Clarify traditional lithostratigraphic nomenclature and present evidence
supporting possible temporal correlations among various lithomembers.
1.2 Location
The Chinle Formation is present in outcrop and in the subsurface throughout
much of the southwestern United States (Figure 1.2-1). This study focuses on
extensive exposures of Triassic strata exhumed in large uplifts (San Rafael Swell,
Waterpocket Fold, and Monument Valley Upwarp) associated with the Laramide
orogeny (Stewart et al., 1972). Four distinct field areas include the San Rafael Swell
south of I-70, the northern part of Capitol Reef National Park, the Circle Cliffs area
within Grand Staircase Escalante National Park, and the White Canyon, Red Canyon,
and North Wash areas within Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Geophysical
well logs were obtained from adjacent areas where the Chinle is present in the
subsurface. The total field area consists of over 5,000 square miles of remote central
Utah desert (Figure 1.2-2). Access to many of the measured sections requires four-
wheel drive vehicles, mountain bikes, or long hikes over steep terrain. Scientific
permits were obtained from Grand Staircase Escalante NP, Capitol Reef NP, and
Glen Canyon NRA.
2
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
14/180
Figure 1.2-1 Distribution of Triassic outcrops in the southwestern United States (from
Dubiel, 1994).
3
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
15/180
Figure 1.2-2 Field area map of central Utah depicting location of measured sections and
well logs. SWC = Spotted Wolf Canyon, TFC = Three Fingers Canyon, EC =
Eardley Canyon, TM = Temple Mountain, CC = Chute Canyon, CL = Chutes
and Ladders, BS = Blueberry Spring, BC = Bell Canyon, ER = End of the Road,
HS = Hidden Splendor, PT = Pasture Track, NW = North Wash, CP = Copper
Point, BN = Blue Notch, JC = Jacobs Chair, FC = Fry Canyon, MP = Muley
Twist, CC = Long Canyon Overlook, FL = Fish Lake, PB = Park Boundary, CR
= Chimney Rock.
4
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
16/180
1.3 Methods
1.3.1 Field Methods
During the summer of 2004 and the winter and spring of 2005, 27 sections
were measured, described, and sampled. Sections were measured with a jacob staff
and Brunton compass. With the exception of several sections measured in the San
Rafael Swell, Triassic strata were found to dip less than 10 degrees from horizontal.
Thicknesses of several highly-resistant cliffs were determined using digital imaging
techniques. Measurements start at the Moenkopi-Chinle contact and stop at a
regionally recognizable paleosol at the base of the Petrified Forest Member. Section
locations were selected on the basis of accessibility (steepness) and exposure quality.
Where permissible, moderate hand trenching was used to increase the amount and
quality of exposure, especially in frothy, weathered slopes. Hand samples of
sandstones and paleosols were collected from many of the sections for petrographic
analyses. Numerous digital photographs were taken at each of the measured section
localities. In addition to these photographs, many photopans were taken from
appropriate vantage points across the field area in order to help constrain the meso-
scale architecture of the paleovalley fill. Paleocurrent data were collected in the field
and analyzed using the computer program GEOrient 9.0 to aid paleogeographic
reconstruction.
1.3.2 Petrographic Methods
Hand samples of sandstones from the Shinarump, Monitor Butte, Temple
Mountain, and Moss Back Members were collected from 13 measured section
locations listed in Appendix III. Hand samples were made into thin sections and
5
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
17/180
stained for potassium feldspar. Three hundred points were counted in a 1 mm grid for
each of the 35 thin sections. Ten grain types were identified for each sample and the
percentage of the following three derived variables: total quartz, total feldspar, lithic
and unstable constituents was computed (Figure AIII.1).
1.3.3 Subsurface Methods
Digitized geophysical well log data were obtained for 21 wells selected from
areas adjacent to field locations where the Chinle is found in the subsurface. Surfaces
were correlated between 18 of the logs using sequence stratigraphic methods
described by Posamentier and Allen (1999) and Van Wagoner et al. (1990). The top
of the Moss Back Member was selected as a datum because of its flat upper surface
and lateral continuity across the field area (Dubiel, 1983). This surface, marked in
outcrop by either a transition from a resistant, well-sorted sandstone to deposits with a
much lower sandstone/mudstone ratio or by an intensely pedogenically modified
horizon, is readily observable in the subsurface.
6
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
18/180
CHAPTER II
GEOLOGIC SETTING
The Late Paleozoic to mid-Mesozoic geologic record preserved in central
Utah is both spatially and temporally complicated by several orogenic events,
laterally diverse paleolandscapes, changes in relative sea level, and shifting climatic
regimes. Despite the interplay between 1) tectonics 2) stratigraphy 3) paleogeography
4) paleoclimate and 5) paleoecology, the wealth of research conducted during the past
century by numerous workers warrants the organization of the information into the
aforementioned subheadings in order to present a tangible synopsis of the geologic
events and environmental conditions surrounding the deposition of the Chinle
Formation.
2.1 Tectonics
The geologic history of Utah is broken down into eight major phases, the first
three of which precede the Triassic (Hintze, 1988). Phase I includes the Archean
craton found in the northern third of the state and the Early-Proterozioc metamorphic
terrane which was added to the craton in the Mid-Proterozic and now comprises the
basement rock for the remainder of the state. Phase II was dominated by state-wide
deposition along a west facing passive margin (Hintze, 1988). Collisional tectonics
during Phase III associated with the Antler Orogeny in the northwest and the
Ouachita Orogeny to the southwest shifted the locus of deposition during this time to
the respective Oquirrh and Paradox Basins. Collisional tectonics and subduction
along the west coast of Pangaea occurred from the Triassic through the Eocene during
Phases IV (Sonoma and Nevada Orogenies), V (Sevier Orogeny), and VI (Laramide
7
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
19/180
Orogeny). Large scale Oligocene and Miocene volcanism and later uplift and basin-
range extension occurred during the most recent Phase VII and VIII respectively.
Of these ever-shifting tectonic regimes, the assemblage of Pangaea during the
Late Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic (Phases III and IV) most strongly affected the
character of the Late Triassic landscape and the nature of sediments from that time
period. Prior to the assemblage of Pangaea, central Utah was located on the western
passive margin of Laurussia. Beginning in the Carboniferous, Gondwana collided
with Laurussia from the south resulting in the initial stage of the assemblage of the
supercontinent Pangaea. Regionally associated with the collisional event, the
Carboniferous to Permian Ouachita orogeny resulted in the uplift of the Ancestral
Rockies stretching from the modern areas of Price, Utah, to Grand Junction,
Colorado, to Santa Fe, New Mexico (Prothero and Dott, 2004). Deposition occurred
in the Paradox Basin adjacent to these uplifts (Condon, 1997).
The initiation of the Antler and Sonoma orogenies during the Devonian and
Late Permian, respectively, is marked by a transition along the western margin of
Pangaea from a passive margin to an actively subducting convergent boundary
(Figure 2.1-1). Sonoman subduction continued through the Late Triassic when the
western flank of Pangaea was occupied by an island arc stretching northward from
present day California and a continental arc that wrapped around to the south into
present day Mexico.
8
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
20/180
Figure 2.1-1 Late Triassic tectonic setting of the Colorado Plateau after Dubiel, 1994,
Lawton, 1994, and Riggs et al., 1996.
Many workers (Dickinson, 1981, Blakey and Gubitosa, 1983, Dubiel et al.,
1991, Dubiel, 1994) classify the Chinle depositional basin as a back-arc basin
associated with Sonoma-related subduction along the west coast of Pangaea. Lawton
(1994) classifies the Chinle depositional basin as a back-bulge basin associated with
the subduction of the pre-Farallon slab. In both models, subsidence of the basin is
attributed to dynamic topography resulting from viscous flow in the mantle above the
subducting slab. However, Lawtons model places a dynamic forebulge in central
Nevada roughly 400 km east of the subduction zone during both Early and Late
Triassic time. The Chinle depositional basin was flanked to the east by the Ancestral
Rockies, which remained a topographic high until it was overlapped in the Jurassic by
9
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
21/180
the Morrison Formation, and to the south by the continental portion of the arc system
often referred to as the Mogollon Highlands.
The breakup of Pangaea started in the Late Triassic with rifting of the proto-
Atlantic margin. Thermal uplift associated with the rifting affected deposition of
correlative Triassic sediments in the Dockum Basin of Texas. However, the effect of
these tectonic events on the Chinle Basin is unclear (McGowen et al., 1979, Dubiel et
al., 1991, Woody, 2003).
Salt tectonics have been shown to have affected deposition of the Chinle east
of the field area in the Paradox Basin (Blakey and Gubitosa, 1983, Hazel, 1991,
Dubiel, 1994, Condon, 1997). Halokinesis was limited laterally by the extent of the
Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation and likely had little direct effect upon deposition
of the Chinle further west in the field area.
Deep-seated deformation, associated with the shallowing of the subducting
Farralon Plate during Late Cretaceous-Eocene Laramide orogeny, resulted in the
formation of several large fault propagation folds, which include the Waterpocket
Fold, Monument Upwarp, San Rafael Swell, and the Uinta Dome. Modern exposures
of Triassic strata are exhumed in these uplifts. Erosion resulting from Late Cenozoic
thermally related uplift, combined with modern aridity, provides excellent exposure
of previously buried Triassic strata across the Colorado Plateau.
10
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
22/180
2.2 Stratigraphy
Figure 2.2.2-1 Nomenclature and gross stratigraphic architecture of Late Paleozoic to Mid-
Mesozoic strata in central Utah.
11
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
23/180
2.2.1 Pennsylvanian -Permian
Deposition during the Appalachian-Ouachita orogeny occurred in the Paradox
foreland basin adjacent to the Ancestral Rockies (Hintze, 1988) where deposition of
Pennsylvanian marine strata preceded the deposition of primarily continental Permian
strata. The Permian Cutler Group was deposited as siliciclastic sediment prograded
southwestward off the Uncompahgre Highland (the Ancestral Rockies) (Doelling et
al., 2000). Proximal to the Uncompahgre, in the deepest part of the basin, the Cutler
Group is termed the Cutler Formation, undivided (Condon, 1997). The Cutler
Formation, undivided grades distally into lithologically distinct units which include in
ascending order the lower Cutler beds, Cedar Mesa Sandstone, Organ Rock Shale,
DeChelly Sandstone, and the White Rim Sandstone (Figure 2.2.2-1) (Condon, 1997).
Shallow marine carbonate was deposited during this time period roughly 160
kilometers further southwest from the hinterland in the Grand Canyon region
(Coconino Limestone, Toroweap Formation). A major marine transgression during
the Late Permian extended carbonate deposition northward, represented by the
Kaibab and Black Box Limestones in the northern portion of the field area.
2.2.2 Early Triassic
The Permo-Triassic boundary is marked by the Tr-1 unconformity, which
separates Permian strata from the overlying Early Triassic Moenkopi Formation
(Figure 2.2.2-1) (Pipringos and OSullivan, 1978). In southwestern Utah the
unconformity at the base of the Moenkopi is characterized by as much as 180 meters
of karstification of the Kaibab Limestone (Jensen, 1984). Erosional truncation of the
Kaibab marks the unconformity in the San Rafael Swell, Capitol Reef, and Circle
12
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
24/180
Cliffs area, however Stewart et al. (1972) suggest the contact becomes conformable
east of the field area.
The Hoskinnini and Black Dragon Members mark the base of the Moenkopi
Formation. These two members consist of terrestrially deposited, wavy-bedded
sandstones, siltstones, evaporites, and coarse chert pebble conglomerates that fine
upward to marine sandstones, shales, and minor carbonates (Huntoon et al., 2000,
2002, Mitchell, 1985). The thickness of these two members is inversely proportional
to the thickness of the underlying White Rim Sandstone because these deposits onlap
the paleorelief formed during the Tr-1 unconformity.
The Black Dragon grades upward and intertongues with the overlying Sinbad
Limestone (Mitchell, 1985). Lithologic textures, which include features such as
cross-bedded ooids, combined with subsurface data suggest deposition in a shallow
marine system with a low depositional slope (Mitchell, 1985). The Sinbad is present
in the San Rafael Swell and is thickest at Capitol Reef National Park but pinches out
to the south and east and is neither present at Muley Twist nor at Hite (Stewart et al.,
1972, Mitchell, 1985). The Black Dragon and Sinbad were deposited during the
Smithian transgression which encroached from the northwest (Dubiel, 1994).
The Sinbad grades and intertongues with the ledgy fine-grained sandstone,
siltstone, and mudstones that comprise the Torrey and Moody Canyon Members. The
Torrey thickens proximally to the east and represents the shoreward equivalent of the
Virgin Limestone Member exposed west of the field area in south-central Utah
(Mitchell, 1985). Both the Torrey and overlying Moody Canyon Members exhibit
very laterally continuous beds, which are identifiable both in the field and in
13
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
25/180
subsurface data. Blakey (1974) identified four facies within the Torrey Member,
which he attributes to deltaic deposition, while Mitchell (1985) and Reif and Slatt
(1979) believe deposition occurred within a coastal tidal flat environment. The
Moody Canyon Member is slightly finer-grained overall than the Torrey Member and
represents deposition either in a restricted marine (Mitchell, 1985) or clastic-
dominated sabkha (Blakey, 1974) environment. The Moody Canyon marks the end of
Early Triassic deposition during the late Spathian Regression (Dubiel, 1994).
2.2.3 Late Triassic
The Tr-3 unconformity separates the Early Triassic Moenkopi Formation from
the Late Triassic Chinle Formation (Figure 2.2.2-1). Fluvial incision and interfluve
pedogenesis of the underlying Moody Canyon Member marks the base of the Chinle
Formation, which is characterized by mudstones, sandstones, limestones, and
conglomerates. The depositional facies represented in the Chinle include a variety of
fluvial, fluvio-deltaic, lacustrine, paludal, and minor eolian deposits, all representing
deposition in an entirely continental setting.
Early paleontologic work by Gregory (1917) placed the Chinle Formation in
the Late Triassic. Ar/Ar dates on multi-grain zircon fractions provided a maximum
age for the Black Forest bed in Petrified Forest National Park (PEFO) of 207 2 Ma.
(Riggs et al., 1994). U-Pb dates of zircons from the same stratigraphic interval
indicate a maximum age of 209 5 Ma. (Riggs, 2003). Sequence stratigraphic
correlations do not extend as far south as PEFO in this study, however preliminary
field data (Woody, 2003, Demko, pers commun.) suggests both the Sonsela and the
14
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
26/180
Black Forest Bed are time-correlative to some portion of the Petrified Forest Member
of central Utah.
Ash (1980, 1987) identifies three Late Triassic floral zones in the Chinle
Formation: 1) middle Carnian Eoginkgoites zone; 2) late Carnian Dinophyton zone;
3) Norian Sanmiguelia zone (Figure 2.2.3-1). Ash finds the Eoginkgoites flora in the
Shinarump and Temple Mountain members, Dinophyton in the Monitor Butte and the
lower portion of the Petrified Forest Member, and Sanmiguelia in the upper portion of
the Petrified Forest Member, and the Owl Rock and Church Rock Members (Ash
1975, 1976, 1977, 1980, 1987). Litwin et al. (1991) divide the Chinle into three
palynofloral zones which correspond almost identically to the megafossil plant zones
of (Ash, 1980, 1987).
15
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
27/180
Figure 2.2.3-1 Triassic timescale modified from IUGS (2004).
The lithostratigraphy of the Chinle Formation contains a myriad of localized
members identified on the basis of lithologic characteristics and stratigraphic
relationships that have proven difficult to correlate across the entire Chinle basin.
Lucas (1993) proposed basin-wide correlations of Chinle and adjacent Late Triassic
strata that ignored the complex spatial variability of the Late Triassic landscape, lack
accurate intraformational temporal control, and confuse the preexisting, well-defined
member nomenclature (Dubiel, 1994). The author agrees with the criticisms of Dubiel
(1994), and Woody (2003), and will use the existing nomenclature summarized in
Stewart et al. (1972) when referring to large scale lithostratigraphic trends. However,
16
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
28/180
intraformational correlations will be based upon chronostratigraphically-significant
surfaces, which, by definition, may cross these lithologic boundaries. The sub-
formation units recognized in the study region include the Shinarump, Temple
Mountain, Monitor Butte, Moss Back, Petrified Forest, Owl Rock, and Church Rock
Members.
Shinarump Member. The Shinarump Member of the Chinle Formation is
recognized as a resistant, quartz rich, light colored sandstone and conglomerate
usually less than 10 meters thick. The Shinarump has been interpreted to have been
deposited by braided streams in broad thin sheets of interconnected sandstone
bodies (Blakey and Gubitosa, 1984). The Shinarump Member rests unconformably
upon the Moenkopi Formation in incised valleys as large as 16 kilometers wide and
55 meters deep (Stewart et al., 1972). The Shinarump represents the first of a series of
deposits that fill these large paleovalleys. In all cases within the study area, the
Shinarump occupies the basal portion of the Painted Desert paleovalley (Figure 2.2.3-
2) and is in direct contact with the underlying Moenkopi Formation (Blakey, 1983,
Dubiel et al., 1999). In some cases the Shinarump is found on top of the Moenkopi
proper, while in other places it is found overlying a pedogenically modified
Moenkopi Formation described as mottled strata (Stewart et al., 1972). The
mottled strata, as described by Stewart et al. (1972), includes several pedogenic
horizons, not only those formed in Moenkopi parent material, but also younger, well
developed paleosols that formed in stratigraphically higher Chinle deposits.
17
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
29/180
Figure 2.2.3-2 Map depicting field area (as depicted in Fig 1.2-2) in relationship to the Painted
Desert Paleovalley (modified from Dubiel et al., 1999).
Stewart et al. (1972) describe the contact between the Shinarump and
overlying strata as conformable stating, the Shinarump Member in most areas grades
upward into and intertongues with claystone, siltstone, or clayey sandstone.
However, Stewart et al. (1972) also include a dramatic photograph (Figure 7 in
Stewart et al., 1972) which illustrates nearly 13 meters of truncation visible in a single
18
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
30/180
outcrop. Demko (2003) interprets the upper contact as a regionally extensive
sequence-bounding unconformity.
Temple Mountain Member. The Temple Mountain Member of the Chinle
Formation was first described in the San Rafael Swell by Robeck (1956) as a purple
and white mottled unit, dominated by siltstones and mudstones with minor
conglomeratic sandstone lenses, found between the Moenkopi Formation and
overlying Monitor Butte and Moss Back Members. Near Hidden Splendor Mine
(Figure 1.2-2), southwest of the type section at Temple Mountain, the unit has been
interpreted to either underlie (Robeck, 1956, Stewart et al., 1972) or intergrade
(Pavlak, 1979) with the Monitor Butte Member. The Temple Mountain reaches a
maximaum thickness of 33 meters north of the type section; further north, the entire
unit is truncated by the overlying Moss Back Member (Robeck, 1956). Stewart et al.
(1972) describe the Temple Mountain as part of the ubiquitous mottled strata based
upon its characteristic color mottling and its basal stratigraphic position within the
Chinle Formation.
Monitor Butte Member. The Monitor Butte Member is made up of green-
gray mudstones and siltstones, thin sandstones, and occasional thin coals and
limestones representing deposition in fluvial, lacustrine, lacustrine-deltaic, and
paludal depositional settings (Dubiel, 1985, Demko, 2003). The majority of the
Monitor Butte in the field area consists of an overall coarsening-upward succession
comprised of sandy limestones and organic rich mudstones, thinly bedded micaceous
sandstones, and burrowed, pedogenically modified sandstones and mudstones
interpreted to represent prodelta, delta front, and distributary facies within a
19
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
31/180
progradational fluvio-deltaic lacustrine system (Dubiel, 1985). Deformational
features including contorted, slumped, and steeply dipping bedding have been
attributed to syndepositional mud diapirism (Stewart et al., 1972, Dubiel, 1985).
The Monitor Butte Member is recognized throughout much of southeastern
Utah in White Canyon, Capitol Reef, Circle Cliffs, and in the southwestern portion of
the San Rafael Swell (Figure 1.2-2). The Monitor Butte overlies either the Moenkopi
Formation or the Shinarump Member where present. Stewart et. al. (1972) state the
Monitor Butte either interfingers with the Shinarump Member or is separated by an
unconformity depending upon location within the basin. Dubiel (1983) claims the
Shinarump interfingers with the lowermost organic rich mudstones of the Monitor
Butte Member in White Canyon. Demko (2003) has interpreted the boundary at the
base of the Monitor Butte to represent a flooding surface sequence boundary (FSSB),
followed by deposition of the Monitor Butte in a highstand systems tract. In Demkos
(2003) model, the boundary between the Monitor Butte and the overlying Moss Back
Member also represents a sequence boundary.
Moss Back Member. The Moss Back Member is a brown, fine- to coarse-
grained cliff-forming conglomeratic sandstone characterized by planar tabular,
overturned, and trough crossbedding and planar bedding (Dubiel, 1983, Stewart et al.,
1972). The Moss Back is exposed as either multistorey sheet or channelform sand
bodies. Dubiel (1983) and Blakey and Gubitosa (1984) interpret deposition of the
Moss Back Member by braided streams based on high sandstone/mudstone ratios,
extensive planar-tabular cross beds, and the multistorey broad sheet-like architecture.
Pavlack (1979) identifies well defined fining-upward sequences and lateral accretion
20
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
32/180
surfaces in the Moss Back in the San Rafael Swell, and interprets deposition by
braided as well as high- to low-sinuosity streams.
The Moss Back averages 20 meters thick, but individual channels can vary
from over 35 meters to zero where they pinch out at the channel margins (Stewart et
al., 1972, Demko, 2003). The base of the Moss Back is marked by an erosional
surface that truncates the Monitor Butte Member, Temple Mountain Member, and
Moenkopi Formation. The base of the Moss Back has been interpreted as a sequence
boundary marking an unconformable basinward-shift in facies (Demko, 2003). The
top of the Moss Back is conformable with overlying Petrified Forest Member strata.
The transition, while conformable, is marked by a lithologic change from a resistant
brown sandstone marking the top of the Moss Back to a regionally identifiable red
aggradational paleosol located at the base of the Petrified Forest Member.
Petrified Forest, Owl Rock, and Church Rock Members. These three
members are dominated by fluvial, lacustrine, and eolian deposits respectively located
stratigraphically above the aforementioned members. The Petrified Forest Member is
the first of the Chinle deposits to overlap the Painted Desert paleovalley initially cut
by the Tr-3 unconformity. The transition between the lower deposits making up the
incised valley fill and the overlying, relatively unrestricted deposits is marked by a
change in fluvial style from large confined stream deposits of the Moss Back to
laterally migrating streams, and by slower vertical sediment accumulation marked by
increased pedogenesis. Demko (2003) and Heckert (2004) recognize a regional
unconformity at the top of the Petrified Forest Member that reflects a non-
depositional hiatus between the Petrified Forest Member and the conformable Owl
21
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
33/180
Rock and Church Rock Members. While recognition of the upper members of the
Chinle is vital to the success of this study, detailed analysis of these members is
beyond the scope of this project.
2.2.4 Jurassic
The Chinle is separated from the overlying Early Jurassic Glen Canyon Group
(Wingate Sandstone, Kayenta Formation, and Navajo Sandstone) by the J-0
unconformity (Pipringos and OSullivan, 1978). The unconformity leaves 40 meters
of the Church Rock Member of the Chinle Formation in Red Canyon (Stewart et al.,
1972) but truncates the entire member at Ward Terrace in north central Arizona
where Wingate-correlative Moenave Formation unconformably overlies the Owl
Rock Member. The Wingate Sandstone forms distinct red vertical exposures over 65
meters thick comprised of large-scale trough crossbedded eolian sandstone. Overlying
the Wingate, fluvial-eolian deposits of the Kayenta Formation crop out as
recognizable banded cliffs and ledges. The Navajo Sandstone unconformably overlies
the Kayenta and is comprised of light colored well sorted large-scale trough-
crossbedded sandstone deposited in a giant Jurassic aged erg that stretched from
present day Arizona to Montana. These three formations serve as a roughly 500
meter thick resistant caprock overlying Triassic rocks throughout the field area and
make up the bulk of the scarps in the San Rafael Reef, Capitol Reef, and Glen
Canyon field areas.
2.3 Paleogeography
Pangaea was initially formed by the collision of Laurussia and Gondwana in
the Carboniferous (see section 2.1). By the Triassic, much of Asia had been added to
22
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
34/180
the eastern portion of the supercontinent which now spanned from 85 degrees N to 90
degrees S latitude (Parrish, 1993). During this time, central Utah was located at 10
degrees N latitude on the western margin of the supercontinent (Figure 2.3-1) (Van
der Voo et al., 1976, Pindell and Dewey, 1982). Low eustatic sea level during the
Late Triassic (Haq et al., 1987, Vail et al., 1977) placed central Utah approximately
500 km from the Panthalassic coast (Dubiel, 1994, Riggs et al., 1996).
Figure 2.3-1 Reconstruction of Triassic Pangaea showing location of field area. Modified
from http://web.uvic.ca/~rdewey/eos110/webimages.html, 2005.
23
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
35/180
Studies of paleocurrent and provenance (Riggs, 1996, Stewart et al., 1986,
Stewart, 1972, Albee, 1957, Gehrels, 1993) suggest the Chinle fluvial systems flowed
west and northwest from as far west as the Dockum Basin in Texas. The
Uncompahgre and the Ancestral Front Range acted as the major sediment source for
the Chinle deposited in the Eagle, Piance, and Uinta Basins in northeastern Utah and
northwestern Colorado (Dubiel, 1991). The source areas for the Chinle of central
Utah were the Uncompahgre to the east and the active continental volcanic arc to the
south near the Mexican border (Dubiel, 1991, Pavlack, 1979). Chinle deposits further
south in PEFO were mainly sourced from the southern and southwestern continental
arc (Schultz, 1963, Stewart et al., 1972, Stewart et al., 1986, Riggs et al., 1994,
Woody, 2003).
Paleogeographic reconstructions depicting the evolution of the Late Triassic
landscape which reflect paleocurrent and provenance data, the distribution of
interpreted depositional settings, and evidence of increasing aridity through Chinle
time (see section 2.4) are shown in Figure 2.3-2. The Shinarump through Petrified
Forest Members are shown to represent fluvial and fluvio-lacustrine drainage
networks draining northwestward toward the Late Triassic shoreline located in central
Nevada. Deposition of the younger Owl Rock and Church Rock Members is
interpreted to have occurred within a more arid, internally drained basin dominated
by ephemeral fluvial, palustrine, lacustrine, and eolian deposition.
24
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
36/180
Figure 2.3-2 Paleogeographic reconstructions of Late Triassic Chinle depositional systems
(from Blakey, http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/RCB.html, 2003).
2.4 Paleoclimate
The Triassic climate is interesting because the large Pangaean landmass had a
dramatic effect upon global atmospheric and oceanic circulation. Worldwide, the
Triassic is marked by areally extensive evaporite and red bed deposition suggestive of
25
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
37/180
arid conditions. However, poorly drained paleosols, perennial fluvial and lacustrine
deposits, and a diverse assemblage of preserved flora from the Chinle Formation are
suggestive of more humid conditions for western subequatorial Pangaea. Not only
does the Chinle basin appear to be wetter than the majority of other Triassic
depositional environments, it is characterized by sedimentary paleoclimatic indicators
that suggest more humid conditions than those of the underlying Permian Cutler
Group and the overlying Jurassic Glen Canyon Group eolianites. Using the then
newly developed ideas of plate tectonics, Irving and Briden (1964) used paleolatitude
data to reconstruct Pangaean paleoclimate and found that the Triassic lacked
latitudinal climatic zones typical of todays global climate. In 1973, Robinson further
described the climate of Pangaea as monsoonal. Later workers have described the
mechanisms driving monsoonal circulation (Kutzbach, 1987) and have described
paleoclimatic indicators preserved in the Chinle which are suggestive of overall warm
temperatures and episodically fluctuating moisture conditions (Dubiel et al., 1991,
Parrish, 1993).
Triassic monsoons are attributed to the northward movement of Pangaea
beginning in the Late Paleozoic. During this time the large continental landmass
became centered around the equator (Dubiel et al., 1991) and differential heating of
the northern hemisphere during the summer created a large low pressure system and
cross-equatorial circulation patterns (southerly winds) dominated. During the
northern hemisphere winter, the low pressure shifted southward resulting in northerly
wind patterns. The center of the continent experienced arid conditions, however,
26
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
38/180
monsoonal circulation would have been strong enough during the Triassic to draw
moisture from Panthalassic Ocean eastward to the Chinle basin.
An abundance of data outlined by Dubiel et al. (1991) and Parrish (1993)
suggests the Chinle basin experienced alternating wet/dry conditions typical of a
monsoonal climatic setting. Numerous vertisols characterized by well-developed
slickensides, desiccation cracks, and occasionally apparent gilgai are found in the
Temple Mountain, Monitor Butte, and Petrified Forest Members of the Chinle.
Optimal conditions for vertisol development are subtropical to tropical monsoonal
climates that undergo alternate dry and wet periods (Blodgett, 1985). The majority of
modern vertisols are found in areas affected by the Indian and East African monsoon
(Brady and Weil, 2004).
Another indication of fluctuating soil hydrology are color mottles. Mottles
form when iron and magnesium in the soils change valence and mineral form to
adjust to various redox conditions in the soil (Montgomery et al. 2000). Paleosols
exhibiting mottles of both low chroma colors like green and gray (typical of reducing
conditions) and high chroma colors like purple and red (typical of oxidizing
conditions) are typical of Temple Mountain and Monitor Butte paleosols found near
the base of the Chinle. Evidence of seasonality is also seen in growth bands of
unionid bivalves where seasonally wet conditions lead to turbid, high suspended load
flow conditions in which the organism stops secreting carbonate and a dark band is
preserved in the shell (Dubiel et al., 1991).
Indicators of seasonality persist through Chinle time; however, minor eolian
deposits and increased evidence of desiccation in the Church Rock Member suggests
27
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
39/180
overall climatic drying through the Late Triassic (Blakey and Gubitosa, 1983, Dubiel
et al., 1991). Pangaea moved further north and had begun to break apart by the
Jurassic. The climate of the region became fully arid by this time as indicated by the
eolian erg deposits of the Wingate Sandstone.
Although recent workers agree the climate of the Chinle depositional basin
was dominated by monsoonal wet/dry seasonality that became more arid through
time, a disparity exists within the literature concerning how much rainfall the basin
received during the deposition of the lower portion of the Chinle. Ash (1972, 86),
Creber and Ash (1990), and Ash and Creber (1992) interpret a humid climate based
on their interpretation of Chinle floral assemblages. Aquatic vertebrate assemblages,
which include phytosaurs and amphibians, also indicate at least local areas with
perenial surface water. Demko et al. (1998) suggest the plant and vertebrate fossil
assemblages preserved in the lower portion of the Chinle may be taphonomically
biased. According to Demko et al. (1998) abundant plant fossils are constrained to
areas located within Chinle paleovalleys where locally high water tables are suitable
for the preservation of organic material resulting in a preservational bias of more
humid paleontologic indicators.
Pollen analysis by Gottsfield (1972) and faunal (Parrish et al., 1986) and floral
(Ash, 1999) specimens representative of upland environments have been interpreted
as indicative of more arid conditions. Evidence of extended dry periods can be seen in
crayfish burrows which exhibit multiple aestivation chambers created in order to
follow falling water tables (Hasiotis and Mitchell, 1989, Hasiotis et al., 1989,
Kowaleski and Demko, 1996). Paleosol analyses by (Dubiel, 1994, Hasiotis and
28
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
40/180
Mitchell, 1989) support the interpretation of dry to hydrologically well-drained
conditions.
Despite temporal and spatial variability and the natural biases associated with
a multitude of climatic proxies, the climatic setting of the Chinle depositional basin
can be described as generally warm, evolving from semi-arid to arid conditions,
punctuated by seasonal variations in precipitation resulting from cross-equatorial
circulation patterns associated with the Pangaean monsoon.
2.5 Paleoecology
Not only was the Chinle deposited during an interesting paleoclimatic
interval, it also coincides with a critical period of biologic evolution. The Chinle
Formation is paleontologically significant because it preserves a record of the
continuing diversification of terrestrial life following the largest extinction event in
Earths history, the Permo-Triassic extinction. The Triassic marks the first appearance
of mammals and the diversification and ascension of dinosaurs. Numerous studies
(Ash, 1972, Gottesfeld, 1972, Ash, 1975, Ash, 1986, Ash, 1987, Ash and Creber,
1992, Ash, 1999) of outstandingly preserved vertebrate and plant fossils preserved
within the Chinle Formation (especially in Petrified Forest National Park) provide
detailed insights into the paleoecology of subequatorial Pangaea. In addition,
continental ichnology has become an increasingly important tool used to identify
hidden biodiversity preserved in paleosols of the Chinle Formation. Trace fossils have
been successfully used as paleoecologic indicators of soil chemistry and hydrology
(Hasiotis and Mitchell, 1989, Hasiotis, 2002, Hasiotis et al., 2002, Hasiotis, 2004).
29
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
41/180
CHAPTER III
DATA AND RESULTS
3.1 Unit Descriptions - Lithology, Facies, and Architecture
Descriptions of the lower portion of the Chinle Formation are organized in
this chapter on the basis of the established lithostratigraphic nomenclature outlined in
section 2.2.3. The variable occurrence of the ubiquitous mottled strata and the
poorly defined relationship between the Monitor Butte and Temple Mountain
Members, in addition to disparities between sequence stratigraphic and
lithostratigraphic correlations, makes such organization difficult. As a result, several
smaller units are described individually outside of the lithostratigraphic classification
scheme in order to minimize any confusion and to aid the transition to the next
chapter.
3.1.1 Basal Unconformity
The Tr-3 unconformity at the base of the Chinle Formation is marked by
erosional truncation of the Moenkopi Formation (measured sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 11,
12, 14-17, 20, 23-27) and/or extensive pedogenesis of those strata (measured sections
1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 13, 18, 19, 21, 22). The contact varies from extremely sharp, where
Late Triassic Strata directly onlap truncated Early Triassic rocks, to gradational where
the uppermost Moenkopi exhibits gleyed joints along bedding surfaces and also
where the occasional penetration of crayfish burrows renders the contact variable
(Figure AI.56).
The paleosols formed in the Moenkopi parent material range from 1-7 meters
thick and are characterized by large color mottles often dark purple, gold, and black
30
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
42/180
haloed by light grey in an overall light purple background (Figure AI.8). Grain-size of
these paleosols is variable, ranging from medium grained sand to dominantly silt and
clay. In most cases, especially where the paleosol is finer grained, these rocks weather
to form resistant, light-colored ledges (Figures 3.1.1-1, AI.12, AI.41). These ledges
extend laterally for several kilometers exhibiting gentle paleorelief of up to 10 meters.
Evidence of soil fabrics include large root traces and burrows; however, often the
identification of such features is difficult because the rocks are extensively
bioturbated and have undergone multiple stages of oxidation/reduction (Figure AI.8).
Evidence of horizonation in these paleosols is limited to gradational changes in color,
color-mottle size and orientation, and grain size Figure (AI.56).
Figure 3.1.1-1 Laterally extensive unconformity paleosol (B) found at the base of the Chinle
Formation east of MS 27. Notice overlying left-to-right dipping lacustrine
clinoforms (A) in the Monitor Butte Member.
31
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
43/180
These paleosols are classified as gleyed oxisols (after Mack et al., 1993).
While the most striking feature of these soils is the various color mottles, the most
prominent process is extensive weathering. The closest modern analogs for these soils
are ultisols formed in tropical regions marked by variable water tables. These soils,
known as plinthites or laterites, are thick, iron-rich, humus poor, and contain color
mottles and clays which become very hard when dried (Brady and Weil, 2004). The
well-indurated nature of similar, Quaternary-aged, paleosols identified in monsoonal
regions of present day Australia, has been shown to affect fluvial geomorphology by
limiting both vertical and lateral channel adjustment (Nanson et al., 2005).
3.1.2 Shinarump Member
The first Late-Triassic rocks to be deposited after the Tr-3 unconformity
include the coarse-grained sand and gravel deposits of the Shinarump Member. These
strata are recognized at the base of the Chinle Formation where the lower portion of
the Chinle is the thickest (measured sections 17, 19-21, 25-27). In the field area the
Shinarump varies from 30 (Figure AI.76) to zero meters thick where it both onlaps
the paleovalley margin and is truncated by overlying units (Figure AI.82). The basal
contact of the unit is marked by sharp truncation of the Moenkopi Formation at all
localities within the field area. Often the upper meter of Moenkopi strata below the
contact is gleyed. The gleyed strata exhibit light grey color bands several centimeters
thick, parallel horizontal bedding, and occasional vertical joints and contrast sharply
with the overall red color of the Moenkopi Formation.
The Shinarump generally consists of yellow-white, coarse, quartz sand and
gravel conglomerate. Sand and pebble-sized sediments often exhibit repeating,
32
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
44/180
decimeter-scale trough-cross beds while the coarser fraction consists of smaller-scale
planar or massive bedding. In addition to these coarse-grained sediments, thinly
laminated lenses less than 3 meters thick, consisting of fine-grained sand and silt,
were found in Red Canyon and near Chimney Rock. In both cases these fine-grained
deposits contained abundant plant fossils and minor amounts of root traces and
desiccation cracks.
On a larger scale, the Shinarump is comprised of several storeys of
amalgamated tablular sand sheets interspersed with smaller lenticular-shaped
channels. Since these channelforms fill a wide, low relief, paleovalley, the resultant
sandbody geometry for the Shinarump is a broad lens.
3.1.3 Post-Shinarump Unconformity
The upper contact of the Shinarump is marked by either erosional truncation
or by a deeply weathered paleosol. Most often the gentle slope-forming nature of the
overlying strata (Monitor Butte Member) obscures the nature of this contact;
however, several meters of truncation of the Shinarump can be seen in the excellent
exposures near the Fish Lake and Chimney Rock measured sections in Capitol Reef
National Park (Figure AI.82).
A well-developed gleyed oxisol, similar in nature to the paleosol described in
section 3.1.1, marks the base of the Monitor Butte Member immediately above the
coarse-grained deposits of the Shinarump Member in White Canyon, at Jacobs Chair
(MS 19), and in Red Canyon (MS 21). At Jacobs Chair, the paleosol is fine-grained
and nearly 6 meters thick. Color mottles found in this paleosol range from dark
purple, red, grey, gold, white, green, to dark black in color (Figure AI.59). Remnant
33
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
45/180
sedimentologic horizonation is crude, however pedogenic indicators such as crayfish
burrows and rooted horizons indicate slow overall soil accumulation under highly
fluctuating hydrologic conditions. At Red Canyon the paleosol is much thinner. Here
the upper 5-30 cm of the coarse-grained Shinarump has been altered to dark green or
black and is intensely bioturbated by vertical burrows ranging from 0.3 to 1.2 cm in
diameter, which weather in positive relief (Figures AI.63, and AI.64).
3.1.4 Monitor Butte and Temple Mountain Members
The Monitor Butte Member is recognized in the White Canyon, Circle Cliffs,
and Capitol Reef areas and is described in measured sections 14-27 while the Temple
Mountain Member is described in the San Rafael Swell at measured sections 1,2, and
4-13. Stewart et al. (1972) describe Monitor Butte strata in the southwestern portion
of the San Rafael Swell; however, the distinction between the Monitor Butte and the
Temple Mountain Members in this region is unclear. As a result, a lithostratigraphic
boundary separating the Monitor Butte from the overlying Temple Mountain Member
is approximated in measured sections 11-13.
In White Canyon, Capitol Reef, and the Circle Cliffs the Monitor Butte
Member is found to overlying the Moenkopi, Shinarump, or either of the soils
described in sections 3.1.1 or 3.1.3. The thickness of the Monitor Butte in these
locations varies from 93 meters at measured section 27 to zero east of measured
section 11 in the San Rafael Swell.
In general, the bottom two-thirds of the Monitor Butte consists of two overall
coarsening-upward, fluvio-lacustrine units roughly 30 meters thick. Palustrine coals,
minor delta plain paleosols, and small-scale meandering fluvial channels can be found
34
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
46/180
near the base of the first of these sequences in the deepest portions of the paleovalley
(Figures AI.65, and AI.66); however, most often the base is characterized by thinly
laminated fine-grained deltaic facies (Figures AI.56, and AI.59), which occasionally
contain thin detrital coal beds (Figure AI.52). Above these heterolithic basal deposits
the remaining lower two-thirds of the Monitor Butte is characterized by gradually
coarsening upward beds, consisting of mudstone to medium-grained sandstone,
dominated by thin planar and current-ripple laminations (Figures AI.51, AI.56, AI.60,
and AI.69). The bulk of these deposits are interpreted as Tb and Tc turbidites typical
of delta foresets (Figure 3.1.4-1). Occasionally, slightly thicker and coarser rippled
and trough-cross bedded sandstone beds overlie the thinly bedded rocks. This facies
is interpreted as lacustrine delta topsets and lacustrine shoreface deposits.
The upper third of the Monitor Butte Member is characterized by three main
facies associated with a high-sinuosity fluvial system: 1) pedogenically modified
floodplain deposits, 2) levee and crevasse splay deposits exhibiting minor
pedogenesis, and 3) fluvial channels and point bars with variable degrees of
pedogenesis (Figures 3.1.4-2, and 3.1.4-3). These facies found in the upper portion of
the Monitor Butte are identical to those observed in the Temple Mountain Member
throughout the southern portion of the San Rafael Swell. The upper Monitor Butte
and Temple Mountain strata occupy the same stratigraphic position within the
paleovalley and, therefore, these units will be described collectively (for further
discussion see section 5.2.1).
Facies 1 consists of pedogenically modified red and purple colored
mudstones. The most common pedogenic indicators include color mottles,
35
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
47/180
slickensides, root traces, crayfish burrows, and a lack of primary physical
sedimentary structures (Figures 3.1.4-2, and 3.1.4-3B). Vertisols, calcisols and
protosols are identified in these strata. In most locations (measured sections 5, 7, 8, 9,
11, 12, 16, 20, and 27) the amount of pedogenic carbonate increases upsection
through the Monitor Butte.
Facies 2 is characterized by 10-40 cm thick, fine- to medium-grained, current
and climbing current-rippled, red and orange sandstones interbedded with planar
bedded silty mudstones which range from 1-15 cm thick (Figure 3.1.4-3A). At Chute
Canyon in the San Rafael Swell these deposits (measured section 5, 28-39) can be
traced laterally southward to a high sinuosity fluvial channel (Figures AI.16, and
AI.17). Often these deposits are slightly pedogenically modified and contain Scoyenia
burrows, root traces, and other signs of bioturbation.
36
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
48/180
Figure 3.1.4-1 Medium-grained sandstone preserved in the Monitor Butte Member near
Capitol Reef at MS 25 exhibiting planar laminations, current ripples, and
minor scour surfaces. Interpreted as Tb-Tc turbidite deposits associated
with a lacustrine delta front.
Figure 3.1.4-2 Reduction haloes surrounding root traces preserved in the Monitor Butte
Member in White Canyon, MS 20.
37
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
49/180
Figure 3.1.4-3 Light red colored fine to medium grained sandstones typical of facies 2 (A)
overlain by finer-grained dark red colored vertisol typical of facies 1 (B).
Chimney Rock, Capitol Reef National Park, MS 27.
Facies 3 is made up of pink, orange, or purple colored mudstones and
sandstones exhibiting current ripples and trough-cross beds found within 3-7 meter
sized epsilon cross-stratification (ECS) sets representative of laterally-accreting point
38
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
50/180
bar deposits. These rocks exhibit a high degree of variability both in grain size and
extent of pedogenesis. In North Wash, just north of Section 15 (Figures AI.17), at
Chute Canyon, just south of Section 5 (Figure AI.44), and at Blueberry Spring
(Figure AI.25) these rocks are moderately well sorted and range from fine- to coarse-
grained sandstones. ECS is well preserved at these locations and is the most
distinguishing characteristic of these rocks at the outcrop scale. In White Canyon, at
measured sections 17 and 20, these rocks are poorly sorted and contain over 50%
mud. At these locations, pedogenic indicators including color mottles, carbonate
nodules, burrows, and disruption of original bedding make the ECS more difficult to
see at the outcrop scale.
3.1.5 Pre-Moss Back Unconformity
In many locations (measured sections 5-7,11-13, 16-20, 22, and 27) a well-
developed carbonate-rich paleosol occupies the uppermost portion of the Monitor
Butte and Temple Mountain Members. These soils are classified as calcisols, calcic
vertisols, calcic oxisols, and calcic protosols (sensu Mack et. al, 1993). They often
contain large carbonate nodules (Figure 3.1.5-1), carbonate filled burrows (Figure
AI.15), and/or carbonate lenses. In several instances the carbonate features seem to
overprint previously developed pedogenic features characteristic of the soils
described in section 3.1.4. In these cases carbonate can be found along vertic cracks,
crayfish burrows, slickensides, and remnant bedding planes. In Capitol Reef National
park the soils found at the top of the Monitor Butte Member are characterized by
dense crayfish burrows originating at the tops of the uppermost horizon. (Figure
3.1.5-2).
39
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
51/180
Figure 3.1.5-1 Large pedogenic carbonate nodules found in a well-developed paleosol at the
top of the Monitor Butte Member in the southwestern portion of the San Rafael
Swell, MS 11.
40
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
52/180
Figure 3.1.5-2 Intensely bioturbated paleosol truncated by the overlying Moss Back Member
at Chimney Rock, Capitol Reef National Park, MS 27.
3.1.6 Moss Back Member
The Moss Back Member is found throughout the field area unconformably
overlying: 1) the Moenkopi Formation in the eastern portion of the San Rafael Swell
at measured section 3, 2) the Temple Mountain Member at measured sections 1, 2, 4-
10, and 3) the Monitor Butte Member in Capitol Reef, White Canyon, Circle Cliffs,
and western San Rafael Swell at measured sections 11-20, 22-27. Where present, the
Moss Back forms a distinct, resistant, brown colored cliff composed of moderately
sorted, angular, quartz sandstone conglomerate often containing numerous rounded
carbonate clasts 1-30 cm in diameter (Figures 3.1.6-1, and AI.61). The Moss Back
varies from 1-100 meters thick and can be seen nearly pinching out at several places
41
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
53/180
near Hidden Splendor Mine in the western San Rafael Swell, and completely
pinching out in White Canyon, and east of Chimney Rock in Capitol Reef National
Park (Figures AI.53, and AI.54).
Along the south wall of Blue Notch Canyon in White Canyon, the Moss Back
forms a resistant, ledge-forming, channel shaped sandstone body incised into the
underlying Monitor Butte Member. The unit varies from over 30 meters to less than 5
meters thick and is comprised of moderately well sorted quartz-rich sandstone
deposited in large-scale poorly developed scroll bars and trough cross-beds. Aerial
photographs (Figure 5.1.5-3) support the interpretation of the Moss Back in Blue
Notch Canyon as an amalgamation of fluvial channels occupying a low-sinuosity,
steeply incised paleovalley. From above, the resistant ledge-forming sandstone can
be traced NW (253) along the southern wall and across the western end of Blue
Notch Canyon. From there the channel appears to bend northward until it goes into
the subsurface near Lake Powell. Another similar sized amalgamation of channels,
occupying a distinct lens shaped channel belt, can be seen in outcrop, oriented NNW
(349), further south near measured section 20.
42
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
54/180
Figure 3.1.6-1 Aerial photograph of Blue Notch Canyon showing extent of Moss Back
Member (basemap from www.maps.google.com).
North of Blue Notch Canyon at Copper Point, the Moss Back is comprised of
less than 10 meters of coarse graveley conglomerate containing numerous carbonate
nodule and mud rip-up clasts (Figure 3.1.6-1). In North Wash, the Moss Back once
again consists of amalgamated fluvial channels made up of large-scale, trough cross-
bedded and moderately well-sorted quartz sandstone; however, the thickness of the
unit is less variable (12-20 meters) than further south and the overall form of the
sandbody is tabular rather than channel (lens) shaped.
43
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
55/180
Figure 3.1.6-2 Thin deposit of conglomerate comprising the Moss Back Member at Copper
Point, MS 16 (A) truncating a well developed paleosol exhibiting densely spaced
carbonate nodules (B). Overlain by dark red, pedogenically modified high-
sinuosity fluvial sandstones of the Petrified Forest Member (C).
In the southwestern portion of the San Rafael Swell, near Hidden Splendor
Mine, the Moss Back sandbody is once again channel shaped and ranges from 6-25
meters thick; however, the unit quickly becomes tabular to the east. From Bell
Canyon to Temple Mountain (measured sections 4-10), the Moss Back is made up of
amalgamated moderate-sinuosity fluvial channels. North of Temple Mountain at
measured sections 2, 3 and surrounding section 1, the Moss Back increases in
thickness up to 90 meters and completely truncates all of the Temple Mountain
Member in some locations. Unlike exposures in White Canyon, the Moss Back
structurally dips over 45 degrees in this region providing only 2 dimensional
44
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
56/180
exposures. Deposition of the lowermost portion of the Moss Back in the Three
Fingers Canyon region was laterally constrained by deeply incised paleotopography.
Photopans and paleocurrent measurements taken at Spotted Wolf Canyon several
miles to the north suggest the upper portion of the Moss Back in the eastern portion of
the Swell was dominated by lateral fluvial channel amalgamation similar to the Moss
Back exposed further south.
3.1.7 Petrified Forest Member
The Petrified Forest Member conformably overlies the sandstone
conglomerate of the Moss Back Member. Where the Moss Back is not present
(sections 23, and 32) the Petrified Forest Member overlies a distinctive, dark red
colored paleosol at the top of the Monitor Butte Member.
In the San Rafael Swell the Petrified Forest Member is characterized by a
color change from white or light brown to dark red and by a change in fluvial style.
While the Moss Back contains trough cross-beds, ripples and massively bedded units
deposited in distinct channel forms and lateral bar deposits, the base of the Petrified
Forest consists of a distinct red colored, well sorted trough and recumbent cross-
bedded tabular sandstone bodies (Figure 3.1.7-1) which overlap the amalgamated
Moss Back channels and correlative interfluves. These sandstones correlate laterally
to dark red pedogenically modified mudstones at Spotted Wolf Canyon in the San
Rafael Swell, and throughout most of White Canyon and Capitol Reef.
In White Canyon and Capitol Reef National Park, the base of the Petrified
Forest Member is recognized by its distinct red color; however, these strata tend to be
much finer-grained overall than those preserved in the San Rafael Swell. Here the
45
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
57/180
strata consist of pedogenically modified mudstones and fine sandstones that exhibit
popcorn (badlands style) weathering. These deposits are poorly sorted and show
remnant planar bedding, trough cross-bedding, current ripples and climbing ripples,
and 2 meter high lateral accretion sets (Figure 3.1.7-2).
Figure 3.1.7-1 Well sorted trough cross-bedded sandstones found near the base of the Petrified
Forest Member near MS 5 in the San Rafael Swell.
46
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
58/180
Figure 3.1.7-2 Fine-grained, red colored paleosol exhibiting relict lateral accretion sets found
at the base of the Petrified Forest Member at MS 18.
3.2 Paleocurrent Data
Rose diagrams and statistical analyses of paleocurrent measurements are shown
in Figure 3.2-1 and Appendix II. The average paleocurrent vector for the lower
portion of the Chinle, 330, is consistent with the findings of Stewart et al. (1972) and
others. The Shinarump Member averaged 345, the Monitor Butte and Temple
Mountain Members averaged 357, and the Moss Back and lower Petrified Forest
Members averaged 313.
47
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
59/180
Figure 3.2-1 Spatial and stratigraphic distribution of paleocurrent directions measured in
the lower portion of the Chinle Formation in south central Utah.
48
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
60/180
3.3 Petrographic Data
The results of the point count analysis can be seen in Figure 3.2-1 and in
Appendix III where sandstones are plotted on QFL ternary diagrams and classified on
the basis of composition (after Pettijohn, 1975).
The Shinarump, Moss Back, and Lower Petrified Forest Members contain
arkosic, subarkosic, and quartz arenites. The Temple Mountain and Monitor Butte
Members contain arkosic, and subarkosic arenites and sublitharenites. Overall, the
maturity of the sandstones decreases and becomes more variable up section.
Spatial trends in sandstone composition are also observed. The Shinarump,
Monitor Butte, and Temple Mountain Members become less mature downstream
from White Canyon to the Circle Cliffs to Capitol Reef. The Moss Back Member
exhibits more spatial variability; however, sandstone compositions become slightly
more mature downstream.
49
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
61/180
Figure 3.3-1 Relative abundances of total quartz, total feldspar, and total lithic clasts as
determined by point-count analyses of sandstones from each of the three
depositional sequences outlined in Chapter 4.
50
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
62/180
CHAPTER IV
SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY
4.1 Introduction to Sequence Stratigraphy
Sequence stratigraphy was developed in the late 1970s promoting the
widespread analysis of sedimentary deposits within a time-based stratigraphic
framework. Whereas traditional lithostratigraphic methods correlate groups of rocks
based upon similar physical characteristics, sequence stratigraphy acknowledges
Walthers law of facies by grouping genetically related packages of rocks
(depositional sequences, systems tracts, and parasequences) which are separated
by chronostratigraphically-significant surfaces (flooding surfaces, and sequence
boundaries) (Figure 4.1-1). Once identified, the geometries and stacking patterns
(stratal architecture) of these packages can be used to interpret a depositional history
based upon fluctuations in accommodation through time. Models developed as a
result of the application of this methodology have proven useful as a predictive tools
for hydrocarbon exploration and have helped to constrain the timing and relative
importance of various forcing mechanisms such as climate, tectonics, and
eustasy/limnostasy (Keighley et al., 2003).
depositional sequence (DS): A stratigraphic unit bounded at its top and base by unconformities or correlative conformities.
flooding surface (FS): A surface separating older from younger rock marked by deeper-water strata resting on shallower-water
strata.
highstand systems tract (HST): The portion of a depositional sequence characterized by aggradation and progradation which
is bounded below by the maximum flooding surface and above by the overlying sequence boundary.
lowstand systems tract (LST): The portion of a depositional sequence that is bounded below by a sequence boundary and
above by a transgressive surface.
maximum flooding surface (MFS): A flooding surface used to separate transgressive and highstand systems tracts identified bya change from retrogradation to aggradation/progradation. Marks the time when the shoreline is at its maximum landward
position, thus subsequent strata downlap onto this surface.
51
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
63/180
parasequence: A genetically related package of rocks that is relatively conformable and is bounded above and below by
flooding surfaces.
sequence boundary (SB): A chrono-stratigraphically significant surface characterized by erosional truncation and basinward
shift of facies. Overlying strata onlap this surface.
transgressive surface (TS): The first major flooding surface used to separates late LST from TST. Subsequent stratal onlapmarks the trend of a shoreward moving shoreline.
transgressive systems tract (TST): The portion of a depositional sequence bounded below by the transgressive surface andabove by the maximum flooding surface marked by landward shift in facies.
Walthers law: Different sediment types (facies) accumulate beside each other at the same time, therefore vertical lithologic
changes in the rock record reflect lateral shifts of facies through time (assuming continuous deposition).
Figure 4.1-1 Glossary of sequence stratigraphic terminology introduced in section 4.1 (Fritz
and Moore 1988, Nichols, 1999, Posamentier and Allen, 1999)
4.2 Application to Continental Strata
Fluvial Deposits. Sequence stratigraphy has been most successfully applied to
nearshore marine sedimentary deposits affected by eustasy (Posamentier and Allen,
1999), where the affects of variations in base level and accommodation through time
can be readily recognized in the rock record. While traditional sequence stratigraphic
methods have been successfully applied to fluvial deposits isolated from the effects of
base level, interpretations become difficult due to the uniquely dynamic nature of
fluvial systems. Unlike nearshore deposits where accommodation (depositional
potential) is dependant upon relative sea level, accommodation in fluvial systems is
either gained or lost by positive and negative shifts in the equilibrium profile of a
stream system, respectfully (Shanley and McCabe, 1994). Changes in basin length,
sediment supply, sediment size, discharge, and base level drive shifts in the fluvial
profile, which ultimately lead to either aggradation or incision of the fluvial surface
(Figure 4.2-1) (Lane, 1955, Allen, 1990, Quirh, 1996, Blum and Tornqvist, 2000).
Overall, fluvial systems are more sensitive to upstream forces (especially sediment
supply) than are marine deposits (Shanley and McCabe, 1994).
52
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
64/180
Figure 4.2-1. Model depicting the controls on aggradation and degradation in alluvial
systems. If sediment supply out-weighs stream power the system will aggrade.
Degradation will occur if the system is sediment starved in comparison to the
stream power (after Lane, 1955).
Marine facies assemblages are generally differentiated based upon water
depth indicators and serve as a proxy for accommodation in marine systems; in
contrast, fluvial systems exhibit complicated and highly variable facies assemblages
that may not be directly related to accommodation. While marine facies vary along
dip and are dependent upon water depth, continental depositional environments vary
along strike primarily due to variations in topography. As a result, the application of
Walthers Law becomes difficult to apply because shifts in facies cannot be used as a
proxy for changes in accommodation.
Despite these inherent difficulties several workers have proposed sequence
stratigraphic methods for fluvial systems that use channel stacking patterns and
degree of pedogenesis as proxies for sediment accumulation rates (accommodation)
(Wright and Marriott, 1993, Shanley and McCabe, 1993, 1994). In general these
53
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
65/180
studies suggest dense channel stacking and increased pedogenesis as evidence of low
accommodation while finer grained deposits with higher overbank/channel ratios and
lower degree of pedogenesis suggest high accumulation rates resulting from increased
accommodation.
Lacustrine Deposits. Accommodation is more easily constrained for
lacustrine deposits where many facies are water depth dependent. Water depth is a
function of basin morphometry (tectonically controlled) and sediment + water supply
(climate controlled). These two factors serve as the basis for the model presented by
Carrol and Bohacs (1999) (Figure 4.2-2) which categorizes lacustrine basins into
underfilled, balance- filled, and overfilled basins based upon lacustrine facies
assemblages.
Figure 4.2-2 Lacustrine classification scheme proposed by Carroll and Bohacs (1999) based
upon the relative influence of tectonic and climatic controls.
54
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
66/180
Sequence stratigraphic methodology has successfully been used to construct
an accommodation history for siliciclastic fluvio-deltaic lacustrine deposits by
considering limnostatic base level fluctuations (e.g. Lemons and Chan, 1999). As in
nearshore deposits, flooding surfaces can be identified and correlated a short distance
landward by examining paleohydrologic indicators preserved in paleosols formed in
adjacent lowlands. However, several distinct differences between limnostatically and
eustatically controlled systems must be considered. First, unlike rivers that flow into
oceans, the discharge of inflowing streams partially controls lake level. Secondly,
lakes are relatively short-lived features and lake level fluctuations can occur on much
shorter time scales (Keighley et al., 2003). An example of these differences can be
seen in underfilled lacustrine basins where short term transgressions during storm
events create fining-upward parasequences (Smoot and Lowenstein, 1991). Overfilled
lake basins also differ from marine basins because tectonic forces, acting to either
raise or lower the sill, affect limnostasy (Carroll and Bohacs, 1999, Keighley et al.,
2003).
4.3 Discussion of Unconformity Paleosols
The well-developed paleosols described in sections 3.1.1, 3.1.3, and 3.1.5
were formed along the margin of the paleovalley (interfluves) during long periods of
local stability or degradation (McCarthy and Plint, 1998, Demko et al., 2004). The
timing and duration of paleosol development is difficult to constrain in these soils,
however they can be used to help identify and correlate several
chronostratigraphically-significant surfaces (sequence boundaries) within the lower
portion of the Chinle.
55
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
67/180
Determining the relative timing of interfluve paleosol development and
adjacent deposition is difficult because the two may occur contemporaneously. For
example, while deposition of the Shinarump was occurring in the center of the
paleovalley near Capitol Reef National Park, interfluve pedogenesis, and perhaps
minimal erosion, continued across the remaining portion of the landscape. This
spatial variability makes it difficult to constrain when each paleosol started to form.
For example, the paleosol found at the base of the Chinle at MS 4 may have started to
form as early as the Middle Triassic after merely 10 meters of Moenkopi was incised
or as late as sometime during the deposition of the lower portion of the Monitor Butte
at the base of the paleovalley (early DS 2).
Soil thickness (depth of weathering) can be used to help make a first order
approximation of the age of an interfluve paleosol by assuming pedogenesis occurred
from the top down. However, since these paleosols spend much of their time forming
on a degrading landscape, and correlate laterally to eroded strata, it is likely that much
of the soil was removed prior to burial.
These problems are addressed when using these palosols as
chronostratigraphic indicators by making several key assumptions about when and
where pedogenesis occurs:
1) Deposition does not occur on the interfluve, the deposits neatly onlap
the paleovalley from the bottom up.
2) Pedogenesis may occur continuously, both during aggradational and
degradational time periods, at all locations above where the strata is
currently onlapping the paleovalley margin.
56
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
68/180
These assumptions serve to temporally isolate the deposition of parent
material from subsequent pedogenesis creating an accurate time-depositional
framework for the Chinle Formation in which the tops of the paleosols are used to
delineate depositional time periods separated by periods of landscape stability or
degradation. The implicit time-pedogenic framework constrains paleosol
development to a period ofpotentialpedogenesis bounded by a maximum age (after
deposition of the original parent material) and a minimum age (just before the soil is
onlapped by subsequent deposition).
4.4 Sequence Stratigraphic Interpretation
Section 4.4 applies sequence stratigraphic methodology to the lower portion
of the Chinle Formation. Three sequence boundaries (SB 1-3) are identified and
correlated across the field area serving to divide the strata into 3 depositional
sequences (DS 1-3) (Figures 4.4-1 and 4.4-2 ). These three sequences closely
resemble the established lithomember classification for the lower portion of the
Chinle, however several key differences exist. The most notable difference occurs at
the Tr-3 unconformity where the sequence boundary is interpreted at the top of well
developed interfluve paleosol whereas the lithologic contact has been defined at the
base of the soil (see measured sections 1,4, 6-7, 9, 10, 13, 22).
Further identification of lacustrine flooding surfaces, their correlative
surfaces, and paleohydrologic indicators preserved in paleosols, provides insights to
the accommodation history (changes in relative lake level) of the basin. These data, in
addition to observed stratal architecture (both at outcrop scale and in interpreted
cross-sections), permits the division of DS 2 into three secondary (higher order)
57
7/27/2019 Sequence Stratigraphy of Lacustrine
69/180
WR6RXWKHUQ:HOO/RJV
P
RED
RD
PINKRED
PIKD
GREYPINK
GRYIK
PURPLE
6RXWKH
UQ:HOO/RJV
&LUFOH&OLIIV
&DSLWRO5HHI
1RUWKHUQ:
HOO/RJV
6ZHOO
3D
3G
)E
/P
/G
)K
)O
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
WR:KLWH&DQ\RQ
6HGLPHQWDU\)DFLHV$VVHPEODJHV
+LJKVLQXRVLW\IOXYLDOV\VWHP
/DFXVWULQHGHOWD
IURQWDQGSURGHOWD
/DFXVWULQ
Top Related