COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 1
Intermodal Round Table and Road Map for RomaniaUwe Sondermann, Kai Petri KombiConsult GmbHRound Table, Bucharest, 20 November 2013
Road Map, final 20 November 2013
COSMOS Project
Fostering the development of (combined) intermodal transport in South East Europe
Objectives
South-East Europe
Cooperative Solutions for Managing Optimized Services (COSMOS)
www.intermodal-cosmos.eu
Co-financed by the European Commission in the frameworkof a Marco Polo Common Learning Action
page 2
of a Marco Polo Common Learning Action
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 2
KombiConsult Germany Consultancy
Adria Kombi Slovenia Intermodal Operator
COSMOS Project
Partners
Bohemiakombi Czech Republic Intermodal Operator
Crokombi Croatia Intermodal Operator
DB Schenker Austria Austria Logistics Service Provider
DB Schenker Bulgaria Bulgaria Railway Undertaking
DB Schenker Romania Romania Railway Undertaking
Ecologistics* Bulgaria Terminal Operator
page 3
Gysev Cargo Hungary/Austria Railway Undertaking
HaCon Germany Consultancy, IT
Lokomotion Germany Railway Undertaking
Slovenian Railways Slovenia Railway Undertaking
Trans Express** Bulgaria Logistics Service Provider
* until 31.08.2013; ** from 01.09.2013
COSMOS Project
Promoting intermodal transport as such,and in particular supporting schemes for modal shift to (intermodal)
Promoting and disseminating intermodal transport
and in particular supporting schemes for modal shift to (intermodal) rail services (administrative, fiscal, technical, financial measures) towards targeted stakeholders (market parties, operational partners and political/public stakeholders)
Dissemination of project results (“promoting campaign”):
Round tables,
Final seminar,
page 4
Knowledge platform (www.intermodal-cosmos.eu),
Other measures such as press releases and COSMOS presentations at conferences and seminars
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 3
Round Tables
2nd Round TableCzech Republic
19 S t b 2013
1st Round TableSlovenia
23 April 2013
19 September 2013
4th Round TableRomania
20 November 2013
3rd Round TableHungary
16 October 2013
6th Round Table
page 5
6th Round TableCroatia
March 2014
5th Round TableBulgaria
February 2014
Round Tables
Co-ordinate the findings and innovative ideas of the nucleus partners and CREAM and DIOMIS studies
RoundTable
Intermodal Operators
RailwayUnder-takings
Infra-structureTerminal
M
Ministry ofTransport
page 6
Table structureManager
CustomersOther Stake-holders
Managers
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 4
Institution Contact Name Present
Allianso Terminal Ploiesti/
Petrica UsureluGeorge Petre
OKOK
Round Table Romania
Participants (1/2)
Ploiesti/Global Shipping
George PetreMadalina Peiciu
OKOK
APM Terminals Eduard Ovezea (Rail Transport Supervisor) OK
Center Tea & Co Diaconu Minel (General Manager) Excused
CFR InfrastructureHoratiu Ionescu (Head of Circulation)Dorin Mitan
OKOK
Club FeroviarStefan RoseanuPamela Luica
OKOK
Dacia/Renault Catalin Luca OK
DB Schenker RailHungary
David Kovacs OK
page 7
u ga y
DB Schenker RailRomania
Eduard Iancu (General Manager)Bogdan Barbu (Sales Manager)Nicolae Ciovica (Director Operations)Adrian Florian
OKOKOKOK
DP World ConstantaAlexandru Godin (Transport Supervisor)Gabriel Gheorghe
OKOK
EACI Eric Kenis OK
Institution Contact Name Present
GysevPeter Kontor (Sales Manager Intermodal)Peter Levay (Sales Manager Projects)
OK
Round Table Romania
Participants (2/2)
Gysev Peter Levay (Sales Manager Projects)OK
Hupac Alberto Grisone Excused
Interferry Boats Gabriela Schubert (Commercial Manager) Excused
Intermodal Logistic Int'l Florin Manolescu (General Manager) OK
JASPERS-EIB Teo Falato OK
KombiConsultUwe Sondermann (Authorised Represenative)Kai Petri (Consultant)
OKOK
KronospanCiprian Danila (Logistic Director)Friedrich Ahammer
OKOK
page 8
ed c a e O
Ministry of Transport Claudiu Dumitrescu (Deputy Director – Infrastructure) Excused
Rail Cargo RomaniaMadalin Ionescu (Sales Manager)Aurel Budala
OKOK
Railport Arad Dana Olaru OK
Tibbett LogisticsAdriana Popescu (Business Development Management)Kristof Schills
OKOK
Transferoviar Grup Ciprian Rosca (Commercial Manager) Excused
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 5
Round Table Romania
Discuss the recent achievements, status quo and future prospects of intermodal transport in Romania
Methodology
of intermodal transport in Romania
Achieve a consent about the growth perspective and coordinate regulative, financial and operational measures that will be necessary to foster the increase of intermodal rail services
Identify relevant actors and time horizons for the realization of the intermodal strategy
page 9
gy
Summarize a “road map on intermodal transport” in Romania
Road Map
Assessment of development of combined transport in countries selected by 2015/2020
Objectives
selected by 2015/2020
Evaluation of threats to and requirements for CT growth
Elaboration of strategic development plan on CT
Assessment of impact on rail infrastructure and CT terminal capacities in countries selected and central Europe
page 10
capacities in countries selected and central Europe
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 6
10:00 Welcome and Introduction
10:10 Status quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
Round Table Romania
Agenda
10:10 Status-quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
10:45
Discussion by topic:- Infrastructure- Ports and Terminals- Port Hinterland Services- Continental Services- Incentive Schemes
page 11
12:30-14:00 Joint Lunch
14:00 Continued Discussion and Actions
15:30 Conclusions
Analysis of current CT market
Area: 238,391 km²
P l ti 20 122 il
General country information - Romania
Population: ~20,122 mil
Density of population: ~84,4/km² (below EU average)
Most city population:
1. Bucharest 1,900,000 2. Iasi 321,000
3. Cluj-Napoca 318,000 4. Timisoara 318,000
Geographically it features
Largest country in south-eastern Europe, with population evenly spread o er the co ntr
page 12
spread over the country
Distributed roughly equally between mountainous, hilly and lowland territories, with the Carpathian mountains dominating
Source: KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 7
Analysis of current CT market
Gross Domestic Product Evolution (2004-2015*)
General country information - Romania
GDP 2012 = 131.7 Billion Euro
Continuous growth since 2004, except for 2009
Expectations still positive
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Billion Euro 61,1 79,8 97,8 124,7 139,8 118,2 124,3 131,3 131,7 141,6 147,9 155,4
Growth 31% 22% 28% 12% ‐15% 5% 6% 0% 7% 4% 5%
page 13 Source: Eurostat, KombiConsult analysis; * EU forecast 2013-2015
Analysis of current CT market
Development of economic and social indicators, 2004-2012
General country information - Romania
150
200
250
300
GDP
Population
Exports
page 14 Source: Eurostat, KombiConsult analysis
0
50
100
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Imports
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 8
Analysis of current CT market
Roles in the physical transport (supply- and value-) chain
Road‐only transport
TerminalOperator
RoadOperator
TerminalOperator
RoadOperator
Railway Undertaking
ConsigneeShipper
Rail/Road transport
ConsigneeForwarder
LSPRoad operator
Shipper
CTOperator
CTOperator
page 15
Operator
InfrastructureManager
Operator Operator OperatorUndertaking
Source: KombiConsult analysis
Door-to-Door
Terminal-to-Terminal
The Romanian transport sector provides for various forms of logistics concepts including Combined Transport (CT) Operators for rail/road and even barge/road transport.
Analysis of current CT market
Combined transport operators (OP) supplying mostly multi-user CT
Roles in the physical transport (supply- and value-) chain
services on account of third parties
Logistics service providers (LSP) such as forwarding agents or
shipping lines operating dedicated or multi-user CT services
Railway undertakings (RU) providing proprietary CT services in
addition to rail traction services
page 16
Shippers, terminal and port operators (Others) supplying CT
services to strengthen core business and/or distribution logistics
Source: KombiConsult analysis; 2012 Report on Combined Transport in Europe
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 9
Analysis of current CT market
Disregarding local or regional lines, public rail network is managed by Romanian National Railway Company “CFR” SA
Infrastructure manager(s)
Romanian National Railway Company CFR SA
Established in 1998, after reorganisation of National Company of Railways
Regulatory agency Romanian Railway Authority(Autoritatea Feroviara Romana – AFER)
Created in 1998, in order to ensure non-discriminatory access to the Romanian railway network and comply with European regulations
page 17
y y g
Four other bodies within AFER:
Romanian Railway Safety Authority (RRSA – ASFR)
Romanian Railway Notified Body (RRNB – ONFR)
Romanian Railway Investigating Body (RRIB – OIFR)
Romanian Railway Licensing Body (RRLB – OLFR)
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010
Analysis of current CT market
After first private operator was established in 2000, in 2013 there are 23 companies carrying out rail freight transports
Railway undertakings with focus on rail freight transport
are 23 companies carrying out rail freight transports
page 18 Source: AFER / OLFR; Club Feroviar
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 10
Analysis of current CT market
Private sector railway’s share increased every year and was able to gain market share of 53% in 2012 one of the highest in Europe
Railway undertakings with focus on rail freight transport
gain market share of 53% in 2012, one of the highest in Europe
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
share state railway transport
share private railway transport
page 19 Source: KombiConsult; Club Feroviar; 2008-2011 interpolated calculation
0%
10%
20%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
However, the “competition on rail” has not prevented from a total decrease of rail volumes.
Analysis of current CT market
CARGO TRANS VAGON
CFR Marfa S A
Railway undertakings with focus on intermodal transport
CFR Marfa S.A.
DB Schenker Rail Romania
Grup Feroviar Roman (GFR)
Rail Cargo Romania
Servtrans Invest S.A.
Transferoviar Grup (TFG)
UNICOM TRANZIT
VEST TRANS RAIL
page 20
VEST TRANS RAIL
VIA TERRA SPEDITION
Source: KombiConsult; Club Feroviar
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 11
Analysis of current CT market
Competition is expected to increase with privatization of national railway freight operator “CFR Marfa” but
Railway undertakings - Privatisation of CFR Marfa (I)
railway freight operator CFR Marfa , but…
1997 – 2007: intentions to sell
2007: privatisation officially announced, several tenders
2011: letter of intent signed by Romanian Government with IMF to sell 20% through Initial Public Offering (IPO) or strategic investor by end of 2011, and total privatisation when market conditions allow it
End of 2012, sale strategy was published, but cancelled again
2013: Strategy was resumed and adopted in February, announced
page 21
in April 2013 for selling shares representing 51% and starting price around 180 Million Euro
Three bids submitted: Grup Feroviar Roman, Omnitrax and consortium of Transferoviar Grup and Donau-Finanz GmbH
All bids rejected (due to incomplete documentation) and participation criteria changed by ministry
Source: Club Feroviar; www.railwayinsider.eu; KombiConsult analysis
Analysis of current CT market
After re-launch: Omnimax was disqualified, and the consortium with Transferoviar later decided to withdraw
Railway undertakings - Privatisation of CFR Marfa (II)
Transferoviar later decided to withdraw
20 June 2013, Grup Feroviar Roman announced as new shareholder of 51% for price of 400 Million Euro (for 275 locos, 39.000 rail freight wagons, of which 10.000 not fit to operate)
Still needed the approval of the Competition Council (CC) because of having a 70% market share
October 2013: Sale is off, due to 60-day deadline of procedure and not obtaining approval of competition authorities
2015 P i ti ti h ll b l t d i th fi t h lf
page 22
2015: Privatization process shall now be completed in the first half of the year, after a restructuring program of the company
Source: Club Feroviar; www.railwayinsider.eu; KombiConsult analysis
The history of CFR Marfa privatisation can not be called a success-story, despite the strategy was to enchain a potential market party and protect the road sector from competition by rail.
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 12
Adria Kombi
Ad i T t d
Analysis of current CT market
Intermodal Operators with “regular” services
Adria Transport d.o.o.
CFR Marfa
Eurolog Srl
Hupac
IFB
Kombiverkehr
Rail Container S R L
EUROLOG
page 23
Rail Container S.R.L.
RCO (Hungária Intermodal Kft)
Rocombi
Rom-Rail
Tibbett Logistics
Source: 2012 Report on Combined Transport in Europe; KombiConsult analysis
Period of recovery during „accession process“ until 2008
D ti d f t t l f i ht l i 2009 d 2010
Development of total freight volume, tonnes, 1998 - 2012
Analysis of current CT market
Dramatic drop of total freight volume in 2009 and 2010,mainly due to loss of road volume related to the economic crisis
-44%
page 24 Source: www.insse.ro, from 1998 only after change of coverage and survey method; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 13
Volume stayed on a low level or even decreased
I 2009 il l f ll t th l t l l
Development of rail freight volume, tonnes, 1998 - 2012
Analysis of current CT market
In 2009, rail volumes fell to the lowest level
Since than, volatile development
50
60
70
80
90Million tonnes
page 25 Source: www.insse.ro, www.eurostat.eu; KombiConsult analysis
0
10
20
30
40
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Analysis of current CT market
After the fall of the iron curtain, and during the „accession period“ quick wins could be realised by road transport which was often more
Development of rail freight traffic - summary
quick wins could be realised by road transport which was often more flexible, open to entrepreneurship and promoted by truck and construction industry
In contrast to that the rail sector lacks coherent infrastructure investments, both in maintenance, refurbishment and new builds- which can be exploited fully only after their entire implementation -while improved roads can be used on sections, already
page 26
Old and general poor state or repair of rolling stock
General mind-set towards road
Source: KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 14
Analysis of current CT market
Development of intermodal traffic, tonnes, 2004 – 2012
Including RoLa traffic in 2005/2006
O l i d t ffi i 2007 Only unaccompanied traffic since 2007
Achieved about 1.5% of road and 4.5% of rail tonnage (2012)
2.500.000
3.000.000
3.500.000
4.000.000
4.500.000Tonnes
Transit
Export
page 27 Source: Romanian Institute of Statistics; DB Schenker RO; KombiConsult analysis
0
500.000
1.000.000
1.500.000
2.000.000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
p
Import
Domestic
Analysis of current CT market
Development of intermodal traffic, tonnes, 2004 – 2012
Including RoLa traffic in 2005-2006, 2010, 2012
I t d l k t d i t d b t i t ffi Intermodal market dominated by container traffic
2.500.000
3.000.000
3.500.000
4.000.000
4.500.000Tonnes
RoLa
page 28 Source: Romanian Institute of Statistics; DB Schenker RO; KombiConsult analysis
0
500.000
1.000.000
1.500.000
2.000.000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Semitrailer
Container
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 15
Analysis of current CT market
RoLa services are rather a political than a market measure
D di l f f t
Conclusions on accompanied CT „RoLa“
Depending on a couple of factors, e.g.
Transport permissions for international traffic, Visa regulations
Driving bans at night, weekends, holidays, or for specific type of goods or trucks
Subvention by the state to compensate operational losses(real rail costs vs. marginal truck costs)
Hardly impossible to forecast
Traditionally in transit through Hungary/Austria:
page 29
Traditionally in transit through Hungary/Austria:
Arad – Wels (only 2005-2007, 2010?, 2012?)
Have become obsolete after the end of the Austro-Hungarian subvention terminated and Ökombi/Rocombi stopped service
Source: DIOMIS Country Report on Hungary, 2010; KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Analysis of current CT market
Development of intermodal traffic, TEU, 2004 – 2012
Unaccompanied CT (containers & swap bodies)
I t f d ti i t ti l t t tl Importance of domestic over international transport, recently
Minor role of transit traffic, recently
300 000
400.000
500.000
600.000TEU
Transit
Export
page 30 Source: Romanian Institute of Statistics; DB Schenker RO; KombiConsult analysis
0
100.000
200.000
300.000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Export
Import
Domestic
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 16
Analysis of current CT market
Development of intermodal traffic - summary
Accompanied intermodal transport (RoLa), only in 2005 and 2006 (Wels Arad/Oradea) until accession to EU(Wels-Arad/Oradea) until accession to EU
Generally small quantities of freight compared to both road and rail
Volatile development in recent years
Domestic services represent the backbone of intermodal transportation (~60%) with container hinterland transport from and to Constanta being by far biggest part of intermodal transport in Romania
International services (~40%) focusing on Western Europe, in
page 31
( ) g pparticular Belgium (Genk – Oradea/Arad),but continental intermodal transport still to be developed further
Growth of intermodal transport is directly depending on the country‘s own economic performance and not generated by transit traffic (like in Switzerland or Austria)
Source: KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Analysis of current CT market
International intermodal traffic by country, TEU-Share, 2011
7%
49%
20%5%
Relations TEU Share
BE‐RO 21.071 49%
6%
4%
6%
page 32
RU‐RO 8.800 20%
DE‐RO 2.960 7%
AT‐RO 2.638 6%
IT‐RO 2.540 6%
NL‐RO 2.052 5%
HU‐RO 1.593 4%
BG‐RO 1.417 3%
SI‐RO 12 0%
Total 43.083 100%
3%
Source: 2012 Report on Combined Transport; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 17
Analysis of current CT market
Intermodal Services offered, 2013
Country ‐‐> <‐‐ Main Operator
SI Koper Arad 1 1 Adria Transport d.o.o.
RO C t t Pl i ti 2 2 Alli t i l
Relation
RO Constanta Ploiesti 2 2 Allianso terminal
IT Piacenza Bucharest 1 1 Eurolog
HU Budapest (‐‐> De, NL) Arad 6 7 Hupac
BE Genk Arad 4 4 IFB
HU Budapest (‐‐> DE) Arad (Ploiesti) 1 1 Kombiverkehr
RO Constanta Suceava 2 2 Rail Container
RO Constanta Bacau 1 1 Rail Container
RO Constanta Miercurea Ciuc 2 2 Rail Container
RO Constanta Ploiesti 1 1 Rail Container
RO Constanta Bucharest 1 1 Rail Container
RO Constanta Pitesti 3 3 Rail Container
RO Constanta Brasov 2 2 Rail Container
HU B d t ( > AT DE A d (Pl i ti) 1 1 RCO (H i Kft)
page 33 Source: company websites; KombiConsult analysis
HU Budapest (‐‐> AT, DE Arad (Ploiesti) 1 1 RCO (Hungaria Kft)
RO Constanta Pitesti 5 5 Renault‐Dacia
RO Constanta Bucharest 0,5 0,5 Servtrans
RO Constanta Bucharest 2 2 Tibbett Logistics
DE … Bucharest ‐ ‐ Tibbett Logistics
AT Wels Bucharest 2 2 Tibbett Logistics
DE Duisburg Aiud planned planned Transferoviar Group
RO Constanta Aiud planned planned Transferoviar Group
37,5 38,5 trains per week
trains per week
Subtotal
Total 76
Intermodal Services offered, 2013
Analysis of current CT market
NL
~ 40% international ~ 60% domestic
Suceava
Miercurea Ciuc
Budapest
Lambach/Wels
Genk
DE
DE
NL
DERUSSIA ?
page 34 Source: KombiConsult analysis
BacauBrasov
Pitesti
Bucuresti
Constanta (DPW, APM)
Arad
Koper
Ploiesti
BULGARIA ?
Piacenza
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 18
Round Table Romania
Agenda
10:00 Welcome and Introduction
10:10 Status quo of the intermodal sector in Romania10:10 Status-quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
10:45 Discussion by topic:
Infrastructure
Ports and Terminals
Port Hinterland Services
Continental Services
Incentive Schemes
page 35
12:30-14:00 Joint Lunch
14:00 Continued Discussion and Actions
15:30 Conclusions
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Owned by Romanian National Railway Company “CFR” SA
Railway network
Characteristics:
total length of network: 10,781 km of track (11,500 km in 1990)
~ of which 3,900 km (36%) are electrified
~ of which 2,950 km (27%) are double-track lines
Power supply: 25 kV, 50 Hz on electrified sections
page 36
Infrastructure generally suffering from a lack of maintenance and investment due to focus on corridors or main railway lines and even greater focus on development of road rather than rail network in the past
Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 19
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Pan-European corridorsCountry considered to provide a favourable geostrategic position as an important “turntable “ for continental and intercontinental transport along the
i hi l W E d N h S h kCorridor IVCorridor VIICorridor IX
main geographical West-East and North-South tracks
page 37 Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Corridor IV: “The link with Western Europe” (864 km)
El t ifi ti 99% D bl t k li 98%
Pan-European corridors
Electrification: 99%; Double-track lines: 98%
Maximum capacity: 210 trains per day
Maximum speed: 95 km/h (freight), only on Bucharest-Campina up to 120 km/h
Modernisation costs for corridor IV for Romania: € 7.991 Billion
Considerable infrastructure investments recently completed, e.g.
• the New Europe Bridge (Danube Bridge 2), the new international rail link between Bulgaria and Romania across
page 38
international rail link between Bulgaria and Romania across the Danube or
• the reconstruction of the line linking Constanta Seaport with Bucharest
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania; CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 20
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Corridor IX: (595 km)
El t ifi d 87%
Pan-European corridors
Electrified: 87%
Double-track lines: 87%, important section between Bucharest and Giurgiu is not electrified
Maximum capacity: 216 trains per day
Maximum speed: 95 km/h (freight), only on Bucharest-Ploiesti up to 120 km/h
Modernisation costs for corridor IX for Romania: € 3.506 Billion
page 39
Corridor VII (Danube)
Less important for rail, but competing mode of certain commodities (minerals, bulk, container?)
Source: DIOMIS report on Romania; CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Ten-T Core Network CorridorsCorridor IV and VII were maintained in the attention of the EU and became TEN-T core corridors now.The link to the Baltic States was shifted to EU
i l i h f i f C id IXRhine-Danube
Orient/East-Med
Corridor IXRussia/BalticumNot considered
territory neglecting the former routing of Corridor IX
page 40 Source: COM 2011/650; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 21
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Rail Freight Corridor (RFC) 7Alignment of TEN-T and RFC-Corridor on rail networkRFC-Implementation Plan achieved in November 2013
Main corridor
Secondary line
Main line via Brasov / mountain area with 30%o gradient impede efficient freight service-> study for expensive long tunnel and gradient of 12%o under preparation
“Secondary” line via Targu Jiu used “mainly” d t k th i l t k i li
page 41 Source: EU 913/2010; KombiConsult analysis
due to works on the single track main line-> rail operators require a more coordinated planning of the works along the corridor
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Electrified lines on RFC 7Main corridor lines electrifiedDespite Craiova –Calafat / Vidin section
Electrified
non-electrified
Craiova – Calafat “heading for new( l t ifi d) D b b id t Vidi (BG)
page 42 Source: CFR SA Network Statement; Foto: Railvolution 5/13; KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania
(electrified) Danube bridge to Vidine (BG) requiring Diesel traction on around 90 km
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 22
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Electrified lines of the main network
Other main network sections electrified, too.
Electrified
non-electrified
page 43 Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Double lines of the main network
RFC7 southern branch (towards BG/GR/TR) only single line.
Double lines
Single lines
Shall be maintained single line, but electrified, because space does not allow for second lineGradient of 32%o at Drobeta/Turnu Severin
page 44 Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
require double traction and limit train length at600 m
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 23
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Intermodal Loading Units – Semi-trailers
13.6 m long4 m external height4 m external height3 m internal heightFlexible to useFor different cargoRequired loadingprofile „P400“
page 46 Source: KombiConsult analysis
Semi-trailers became standard equipment in international road transport and thus intermodal operation
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
The „P400“ loading gauge became effective on Brenner lineMünchen (DE) and Verona (IT) by the year 2000
Impact of „P400“ profile on intermodal development
München (DE) and Verona (IT) by the year 2000
Total unaccompined CT
Semi-trailers
Loading units p.a.
page 47 Source: KombiConsult analysis
Due to enlargementthe number oftransported semi-trailers increased by600% in eight years.
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 24
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Loading gauge & Weight class on RFC 7
P/C 78/402P/C 70/400P/C 45/375; C3Non classified
HU: P/C 400!until Curtici(Rail PortArad)
All loading gauges too small forcontinental CT, mainly due to tunnel profile-> Investigation worth to be required
Weight class C3“ provides for axle load of
page 48 Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
P/CP/C45/375
Weight class „C3 provides for axle load of20t axle load, only, even after rehabilitation
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Maximum permitted train length on RFC 7RFC7 south branch (towards BG/GR/TR) good length, but single lineOther sections (Brasov/Predeal) limited train length on double line
750 – 720 m675 – 640 m600 – 550 m
page 49 Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 25
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Impact of the maximum permitted train length
Maritime Continental
Train length 600 m 700 m 600 m 700 mTrain length 600 m 700 m 600 m 700 m
Wagon length 26 m 26 m 34 m 34 m
N°of wagon 23 26 17 20
Capacity 4 TEU 4 TEU 2 ST 2 ST
Total Capacity* 92 104 34 40
Difference 12 TEU 6 Semi-Trailers (ST)
Efficiency +13% +17%
page 50
y % %
Wagon type Sggnss/Sggr/ss 80‘ T3000 104‘
* Maximum train weight may reduce the total capacity
Source: KombiConsult analysis
An increase of the maximum permitted (wagon) train length from 600 to 700 mwould bring a gain in efficiency by 17% in continental and 13 % in maritime traffic.
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Impact of the maximum permitted train length
Maritime Continental
Train length 600 m 700 m 600 m 700 mTrain length 600 m 700 m 600 m 700 m
Wagon tara 21.5 t 21.5 t 35 t 35 t
N°of wagon 23 26 17 20
Tare weight 495 t 560 t 595 t 700 t
Total Capacity 92 TEU 104 TEU 34 ST 40 ST
Ø Weight 12 t/TEU 28 t/ST
Load weight 1.104 t 1.248 t 952 t 1.120 t
page 51
g
Total weight 1.599 t 1.808 t 1.527 t 1.820 t
Difference 209 t 273 t
Efficiency +13% +17%
Wagon type Sggnss 80‘ T3000 104‘
Source: KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 26
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Border crossing stations
Ágerdőmajor (HU) /Carei
Diacovo (UA) /Halmeu
Nyírábrány (HU) /
Teresva (UA) /Campulung la Tisa
Berlibas (UA) /Valea Viseului
Vadu Siret (UA) /Vicsani
Valea lui Mihai
Ungheni(MD) /Ungheni Prut
(MD) /Falciu
Giurgiulești (MD) /Galati
Kikinda (RS) /Jimbolla
Lokoshaza(HU) /Curtici
Kotegyan (HU) /Salonta
Biharkeresztes (HU) /Episcopia Bihor
EU border
External border
Important stationProblems encountered for?: Opening Time Transition Time Hand-over procedure Capacity Availability of tracks,
page 52 Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Kardam (BG) /Negru Voda
Ruse (BG) /Giurgiu
Vidin (BG) /Calafat
Vrsac (RS) /Stamora Moravita
Availability of tracks,shunting persons, locos
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Border crossing stopping times – examples 2009
4 hours
page 53 Source: CREAM project, HaCon analysis, 2009
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 27
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Infrastructure managers (IM) and railways (RU) have accepted the traditional relatively long processing times
Border crossing – challenges discussed in Round Table
traditional, relatively long processing times.
Romania (and Bulgaria) could not enter the Schengen-Area as planned so that border police and customs activities are still required on the – sometimes two – border stations
Due to the relatively long waiting times at the Curtici station (RO-> 25 hours; HU->RO 7 hours) the train parking capacity is limited
Next to the time table slots in particular somewhat „uncoordinated“ works on either side of the border have been experienced and
page 54
should be avoided in future by an improved coordination between IM
The impact of the malfunction was a block of the trains, stop of production site and consideration to close the site and remove it to Western Europe
Source: COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Border crossing remains on the agenda of infrastructure managers and railway undertakings, in particular when customers needs on fast and reliable international train services are taken into account.
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Maximum permitted speed on RFC7Commercial speed „50 km/h“ is far below design speed.
>120 km/h100 – 95 km/h85 – 60 km/h
Design Speed!Operational Speed?Commercial Speed?
- lack of maintenance or re-investment in the past,
- lack of traffic managementsystem
- use of old wagons- operational stops of railways
page 55 Source: CFR SA Network Statement 2013; KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
y- a „performance regime“
including penalties is projected
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 28
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Port of Constanta – Bucharest line
Rehabilitated double track lineCables (partly) dismantled by theftMixed use by pax and freight
Not rehabilitatedInsufficient use forbuffering trains
Port and private sidingsModernised to the needs of users
Main LineBucuresti - Constanta
Freight Station„Valu lui Traian “
Port Lines toTerminals
X X
y p gSlow (max. 60 km/h) heavy (3.000t)freight trains determine speedLack of modern dispatching centre
g
Direct dependency
page 56
Mobilize police against theftCreate bundles of container train slotsfor higher speed (100 km/h)and lighter (1.800t) trainsImplement modern dispatching centreovernight trains
Rehabilitation neededby CFR S.A.(or by Port Authority if property sold)Industrialised production
Source: KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Capacity on RFC7Already the RFC7 Implementation plan highlights lines with limited capacity. Improvement measures are (partly) identified but theireffective implementation takes more time.
sufficientrestricted
Improvement Measures?
page 57 Source: RFC7 Implementation Plan 2013; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 29
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Railway network – overall actual status
Parameter Unit Objective Actual value
Lauding gauge P/C 70 – P/C 400 P/C 45 – P/C 375
Nominal speed km/h 12085-90(25 km/h commercialspeed)
Mass per axle t/axle22,5 v≤100 km/h
20 5
page 58
Mass per axle t/axle20 v≤120 km/h
20,5
Minimum usefulsiding length
m 750 500-700
Gross tonnageof trains
t 1.500 1.400-3.000
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Infrastructure access charges
page 59 Source: RFC7 Implementation Plan; KombiConsult analysis
Second highest access charges compared to neighbouring RFC7 countries in 2012.
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 30
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Modernisation of railway network
Most activities originate from accession process should be already completed by 2013 but are behind schedulecompleted by 2013, but are behind schedule
Building double-track lines
Improvement of maximum permitted axle weight to 22,5t
Increased maximum speed to 120 or 160km/h
Romania is one of the countries with lowest rate of using theEuropean structural funds budgets
page 60
European structural funds budgets
Source: KombiConsult analysis
Analysis of current CT: infrastructure
Continuation of Pan-European, Trans-European and Rail Freight
Railway network – Summary and Conclusions
p , p gCorridor lines on Romanian territory
RFC7 implementation plan as a good starting point requiring more orientation to the users and transparent monitoring of realisation
Works required on long time identified sections to complete corridors usable by rail traffic
Loading gauge analysis and eventually enlargement starting from Curtici to Bucharest to involved terminals
Accept (limited) weight class “C3” as stipulated in the RFC7
page 61
Accept (limited) weight class C3 as stipulated in the RFC7
Facilitate 700m (wagon) train length in coordination with neighbouring IM and RU
Improve border crossing procedures in close cooperation with customs/border police, IM and RU
Seek to obtain cheaper network access charges for block trains
Source: KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 31
Round Table Romania
Agenda
10:00 Welcome and Introduction
10:10 Status quo of the intermodal sector in Romania10:10 Status-quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
10:45 Discussion by topic:
Infrastructure
Ports and Intermodal terminals
Port Hinterland Services
Continental Services
Incentive Schemes
page 62
12:30-14:00 Joint Lunch
14:00 Continued Discussion and Actions
15:30 Conclusions
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Intermodal terminals - overview~ 30 terminals altogether, but majority is non-operating
Botosani
CFR terminalsPort terminalsPrivate terminals
Bacau
Baia Mare
Brasov Triaj
Cluj Napoca Est
Galati Marfuri
Glogovat
Socola (Iasi)
Medias
Oradea Est
Semenic Sibiu
Suceava
Targu Mures
Zalau
Arad
Bistrita
Turda
page 63
Bradu de Sus / Pitesti
Bucuresti CPBBucuresti NoiBucuresti Sud
Bujoreni ValceaBuzau Sud
Constanta APMConstanta CSCTConstanta SOCEPConstanta UMEX
Craiova
Galati Marfuri
Ploiesti Crang
Ploiesti
Leordeni
Bucharest
Source: KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 32
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
There are about 25 intermodal terminals, owned by CFR Marfa and operated by CFR Transauto (now Rofersped)
Intermodal terminals – “CFR Marfa”
operated by CFR Transauto (now Rofersped)
Mostly built in 1970s, when trucks were not permitted to drive over 100 km
Since then they have not been well maintained or used properly, no big investments were made
Thus terminal infrastructure is in poor condition
Modernising the majority of these facilities does not appear to be a sound investment, currently
page 64
y
Bacau, Baia Mare, Brasov, Medias, Sucueva, Turda and Zalau Nord known to be operating of CFR Marfa terminals, operated by Rofersped (before CFR Transauto)
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Small number of private terminals in:
A d (C t i T i l R il t A d)
Intermodal terminals – “Private”
Arad (Container Terminal Railport Arad),operated by SC Railport Arad SRL
Bucharest (Bucharest Intermodal Terminal),operated by Tibbett Logistics
Constanta (2 terminals): operated by APM, DP World
Leordeni (Center Tea & Co Terminal), operated by SC Center Tea & Co S.R.L.
Pitesti (Dacia)
page 65
Pitesti (Dacia)
Ploiesti (Allianso Terminal Ploiesti),operated by Allianso Terminal-Rail Cargo TSA
Planned terminal in Aiud by Transferoviar Group in 2013
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010; www.intermodal-terminals.eu
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 33
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Intermodal terminals – Most active sites
Botosani
Bacau
Baia Mare
Brasov Triaj
Cluj Napoca Est
Galati Marfuri
Glogovat
Socola (Iasi)
Medias
Oradea Est
Semenic Sibiu
Suceava
TurdaTargu Mures
Zalau
Arad
BistritaBacau (Rofersped)
Railport Arad
Brasov (Rofersped)
Ploisti (Allianso)
page 66
Bradu de Sus / Pitesti
Bucuresti CPBBucuresti NoiBucuresti Sud
Bujoreni ValceaBuzau Sud
Constanta APMConstanta CSCTConstanta SOCEPConstanta UMEX
Craiova
Galati Marfuri
Ploiesti Crang
Ploiesti
Leordeni
Bucharest
Source: KombiConsult analysis
Ploisti (Allianso)
Leonardi (Tea & Co)
Bucharest Intermodal (Tibbett) Constanta (APM, DP World)
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Intermodal terminals – Details on handling tracks, equipment, annual capacity (and volume)
Mobile
RMG RTG N° RS N° m handling tracks Min
Allianso Terminal Ploiesti ALLIANSO TERMINAL-RAIL CARGO TSA 1 3 1.800 30.000 112.500 30.000Baia Mare Rofersped S.A. (Baia Mare) 2 2 384 100.000 24.000 24.000Brasov Rofersped S.A. (Brasov) x 1 2 600 50.000 37.500 37.500Bucharest Intermodal Terminal Tibbett Logistics 2 2 500 60.000 31.300 31.300Center Tea & Co Terminal SC Center Tea & Co S.R.L. 1 1 300 30.000 18.800 18.800Constanta Port (APM) APM Terminals (Constanta) x 1 2 1 650 110.000 40.600 40.600Constanta South Container Terminal DP World Constanta x 2 3 1.848 100.000 115.500 100.000Container Terminal Railport Arad SC Railport Arad SRL x 1 2 2 1.300 110.000 81.300 81.300Medias Rofersped S.A. (Medias) 2 2 320 100.000 20.000 20.000Rofersped Terminal Bacau Rofersped S.A. (Bacau) x 1 1 150 50.000 9.400 9.400Suceava Rofersped S.A. (Suceava) 2 2 300 100.000 18.800 18.800Turda Rofersped S A (Turda) 1 2 230 50 000 14 400 14 400
Name OperatorGantry Total tracks Capacity (LU p.a.)
page 67 Source: KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Assumptions: 12 hours per day; 250 days p.a.; RMG 25/RS 15 LU/hr; 1.5 LU/wagon;flow factor 1,5 (which is high and requires storage tracks nearby)further limitation by small storage space not considered, yet
Turda Rofersped S.A. (Turda) 1 2 230 50.000 14.400 14.400Zalau Nord Rofersped S.A. (Zalau Nord) x 1 2 220 50.000 13.800 13.800
940.000 537.900 439.900
Generally sufficient handling capacity for the currently (low) handling volumes.
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 34
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Intermodal terminals – operators can update their data
www.intermodal-terminals.eu/database
page 68
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Intermodal strategy Romania 2020
Maximization of cargo bundling 2011-2015, by
O ti i i ° f t i l i l ti t b dli t t Optimizing n° of terminals in relation to cargo bundling target
Only support development of terminals on locations, where:
• Large industrial complex already is present
• Large production and/or assembly and/or trading activities are planned in an industrial park with a size of at least 50ha
• Enter a dialogue with private sector to develop a collaborative strategy focused on intermodal terminal dev.
page 69 Source: Intermodal strategy Romania 2020; Round Table Romania
An intermodal strategy is needed at country level to guide public and private investment.The intended “dialogue” is appreciated by the stakeholders but did not take place, yet.
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 35
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Intermodal terminals – Short / mid-term locations
Botosani
Locations should respect the investments and capacity of present terminals and fill gaps, only.Terminal investments should be accompanied by a thorough market analysis and take into account efficient train productions systems to link with other terminals.
Bacau
Baia Mare
Brasov Triaj
Cluj Napoca Est
Galati Marfuri
Glogovat
Socola (Iasi)
Medias
Oradea Est
Semenic Sibiu
Suceava
TurdaTargu Mures
Zalau
Arad
Bistrita
page 71
Bradu de Sus / Pitesti
Bucuresti CPBBucuresti NoiBucuresti Sud
Bujoreni ValceaBuzau Sud
Constanta APMConstanta CSCTConstanta SOCEPConstanta UMEX
Craiova
Galati Marfuri
Ploiesti Crang
Ploiesti
Leordeni
Bucharest
Source: Intermodal strategy Romania 2020; KombiConsult analysis; Round Table Romania
Analysis of current CT: intermodal terminals
Intermodal strategy Romania 2020
Efficient rail access
Effi i t d
ry
Efficient road access
Non-exclusive, so open to all users
Capability of receiving full trains 750m minimum, 2 tracks
Total surface of at least 8 hectares
Inclusion of empty container depot
Stacking capacity of 200 LU
24/7/52 year round operation
man
dato
tiona
lly
page 72
24/7/52 year round operation
Secured, accommodating extendedcustoms gate solution
State-of-art ICT connections
Source: Intermodal strategy Romania 2020; Photo: DUSS Frankfurt am Main (Ost); COSMOS Round Table RO 2013
Criteria, generally useful, but only the first 4 should be mandatory, while the others are depending on the market to be attracted and the operation concept
opt
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 36
Round Table Romania
Agenda
10:00 Welcome and Introduction
10:10 Status quo of the intermodal sector in Romania10:10 Status-quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
10:45 Discussion by topic:
Infrastructure
Ports and Terminals
Port Hinterland Services
Continental Services
Incentive Schemes
page 73
12:30-14:00 Joint Lunch
14:00 Continued Discussion and Actions
15:30 Conclusions
Domestic transport dominated by maritime hinterland traffic from and to Port of Constanta
Port of Constanta
Analysis of current CT: Port Hinterland Services
and to Port of Constanta
One of the largest EU port in the Eastern Europe:Europe’s Eastern gateway and “hub” on the Black Sea
Positioned on Pan-European Corridor IV, VII and IX
4 container stevedore companies:
APM Terminal
Socep
Constanta South Container Terminal (DP World Constanta)
page 74
Constanta South Container Terminal (DP World Constanta)
UMEX
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 37
Analysis of current CT: Port Hinterland Services
Port of Constanta - Map
APMCSCT
page 75 Source: Port web site; KombiConsult analysis
Master Plan developed, including a development strategy to 2020 and short term by 2013
Port of Constanta – development strategy
Analysis of current CT: Port Hinterland Services
and short term by 2013
Building new container terminal for big tonnage capacity vessels
Increasing handling capacity of DP World to 2 Million TEU
Extension of railway system, linking South port more efficiently and improving rail transit times, additional lines, building a systematised railway complex (the latter financed by SOP-T); and
Total handling volumes to be increased up to 2.5 Million TEU
Idea of developing common collaboration projects with the port of
page 76
Idea of developing common collaboration projects with the port of Rotterdam (Memorandum in 2011) – but no results, yet
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 38
Volumes dropped significant due to economic crisis in 2009
Port of Constanta – Development of CT, 2003 - 2020
Analysis of current CT: Port Hinterland Services
1.500.000
2.000.000
2.500.000
3.000.000
Masterplan
~40% Hinterland transport (by road, rail or waterway),~45% of which by rail
page 77
‐
500.000
1.000.000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
p
Total
Others: APM Terminal & UMEX
Socep
DP World
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010; KombiConsult analysis
Thus, in 2012, a new Masterplan was initiated
M di d l t t t i l i 2012 2040 f
Port of Constanta – development measures
Analysis of current CT: Port Hinterland Services
Medium and long term strategic planning 2012-2040 for an optimum planning of investments
To be financed by the SOP-T; application for financing is analysed
Tender for selection of consultant to prepare Master Plan was launched, 8 candidates have submitted interest, 7 were invited and 6 of them submitted bids
page 78
ADB Multiplatform (Adriatic-Danube-Black-Sea Multimodal Platform)
Part of Transnational Cooperation Programme South East Europe
To better integrate South-eastern Europe on EU’s market by increasing efficiency, attractiveness and competitiveness of transport system in the region (integrated network)
Source: Port of Constanta; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 39
Intermodal Services 2013 – Port Hinterland Services
Analysis of current CT: Port Hinterland Services
NL
Suceava
Miercurea Ciuc
Budapest
Lambach/Wels
Genk
DE
DE
NL
DE
Single wagon load
page 79 Source: KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
BacauBrasov
Pitesti
Bucuresti
Constanta (DPW, APM)
Arad
Koper
Ploiesti
Analysis of current CT: Port Hinterland Services
Intermodal Services 2013 – Port Hinterland Services
Botosani
Bacau
Baia Mare
Brasov Triaj
Cluj Napoca Est
Galati Marfuri
Glogovat
Socola (Iasi)
Medias
Oradea Est
Semenic Sibiu
Suceava
Targu Mures
Zalau
Arad
Bistrita
Turda
page 80
Bradu de Sus / Pitesti
Bucuresti CPBBucuresti NoiBucuresti Sud
Bujoreni ValceaBuzau Sud
Constanta APMConstanta CSCTConstanta SOCEPConstanta UMEX
Craiova
Galati Marfuri
Ploiesti Crang
Ploiesti
Leordeni
Bucharest
Source: KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 40
Round Table Romania
Agenda
10:00 Welcome and Introduction
10:10 Status quo of the intermodal sector in Romania10:10 Status-quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
10:45 Discussion by topic:
Infrastructure
Ports and Terminals
Port Hinterland Services
Continental Services
Incentive Schemes
page 81
12:30-14:00 Joint Lunch
14:00 Continued Discussion and Actions
15:30 Conclusions
Analysis of current CT: Continental Services
Intermodal Services 2013 – Continental Services
NL
Suceava
Miercurea Ciuc
Budapest
Genk
DE
DE
NL
DE
Single wagon load
Lambach/Wels
page 82 Source: KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
BacauBrasov
Pitesti
Bucuresti
Constanta (DPW, APM)
Arad
Koper
Ploiesti
Piacenza
EUROLOG
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 41
Analysis of current CT: Continental Services
Continental freight transport in total achieved a market share of 40% (2012)
Continental intermodal services - Conclusions
~40% (2012)
Principle trade lanes are between the Romanian intermodal “hot spots” of Curtici/Arad and Ploiesti with Belgium/Germany
Main commodities were chemicals, food, non-food and various industrial and consumer merchandise
page 83
Infrastructure limitations (max. axle load < 20t, loading profile <P400) hinder growth of continental intermodal services
Technically-operationally loading units are suited for almost all types of goods (see next page)
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010
Analysis of current CT: Continental Services
Continental intermodal services – Loading units
page 84 Source: COSMOS project website
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 42
Analysis of current CT: Continental Services
Strategic competition on land and short sea routings
FrankfurtL d i h f
Operational Parameters:
Trieste
Pendik
Ludwigshafen
3x
3
Start of operation: 07.10.2013
page 85
pFast transport by train and ferryLocal pick-up/delivery by truckSuitable for 4-m high semi-trailers („P400“)3 / 6 departures / week x directionMulti-client train open for forwardersSynchronised servicesComplementary to existing services
Patras
Pendik3x
6x
Source: Kombiverkehr/KombiConsult
Round Table Romania
Agenda
10:00 Welcome and Introduction
10:10 Status quo of the intermodal sector in Romania10:10 Status-quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
10:45 Discussion by topic:
Infrastructure
Ports and Terminals
Port Hinterland Services
Continental Services
Incentive Schemes
page 86
12:30-14:00 Joint Lunch
14:00 Continued Discussion and Actions
15:30 Conclusions
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 43
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
Government Ordinance N° 88/1999, article 6, establishing rules for combined transport
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
combined transport
Ministry of Transport & Infrastructure:Sustainable Transport Strategy 2008
Spatial Planning of the National Territory,Section I – Transport Networks (law no. 363/2006)
Sectorial Operational Programme on Transport 2007 – 2013 (SOPT)
Intermodal Transport Strategy Romania 2020
General Transport Master Plan
page 87
General Transport Master Plan
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010; KombiConsult analysis
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
To promote intermodal traffic, the following instruments have been implemented:
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
implemented:
Article 6 in Government Ordinance no.88/1999, establishing rules for combined transport of goods, stating that economic agents involved in CT may be granted temporary exemptions for income tax in return for investment in infrastructure development and for acquisition/modernisation of installations relating specifically to CT;
To promote operation of rail block trains between terminals, it is planned that block trains receive a reduction in rail access charges ( 60%)
Not beengranted ,yet
Not beengranted yet
page 89
charges (~60%)granted ,yet
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010; KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 44
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
Sectorial Operational Programme on Transport 2007 – 2013 (SOPT)
Fi i th t ti d d i ti f t i l
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
Financing the construction and modernisation of terminals
18 Million EUR fund
2011: Guide for applicants published
Project submissions expected by end of 2013
only together with railway infrastructure manager (CFR SA) to get funds, despite the fact that CFR SA does not own or operates such terminals
Amendment in 2013 with a list of 13 cities as key locations for
page 90
Amendment in 2013 with a list of 13 cities as key locations for modernization and construction of intermodal terminals
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania, 2010; Club Feroviar; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Thus, no Euro has been spent from the funds allocated by EC and state budget
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
In January 2012, Romanian Government approved Memorandum signed by Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure and Romanian
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
signed by Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure and Romanian Ministry of Economy and Trade on creating an interministerial structure to ensure general management of interministerial Programme “Logistics Centre for RE-Export in Central and Eastern Europe”
Objectives (amongst others)
turn into account competitive position of transport infrastructure
Increase intermodal transport
Improve quality and efficiency of services
page 91
y y
Reduce effects of economic crisis, greenhouse emissions and environmental impact to the minimum
Development of regional centre in Recas (Timisoara) for relaunching intermodal transport
Source: Club Feroviar
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 45
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
Intermodal Transport Strategy Romania 2020
P bli h d i 2011 b R i Mi i t f T t d
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
Published in 2011 by Romanian Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure
Target for 2020: intermodal transport accounting for 40%(1,4 million TEU) of movement of relevant goods(Containers, ILU, swap bodies and other boxes, trailers)
Maximization of cargo bundling especially in 2011-2015
To develop intermodal terminals in particular in Bucharest, Constanta and Timisoara
page 92
Budget plan 2011-2013: 61 Million EUR
Budget plan 2014-2020: 114 Million EUR
Source: Intermodal Strategy Romania 2020; KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Needs to be revised taking into account the recent market development, terminals developed by the private sector in the meantime, shortcomings on rail infrastructure and transparent rules for application by market parties including realistic business plan.
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
Intermodal Transport Strategy Romania 2020 – Actions (I)
ISR2020 St t Ad ti
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
ISR2020 Strategy Adoption
Intermodal Terminal development 2011-2015
Intermodal Terminal development 2016-2020
Preparation SOPT 2014-2020
ISR Organization
Supply Chain & Logistics Education and Training
Accessibility of Europe via Black Sea
page 93
CFR Infrastructure use contracts
Source: Intermodal Strategy Romania 2020; KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Actions generally appreciated but need to be prioritized with stakeholders, who are willing to support this.
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 46
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
Intermodal Transport Strategy Romania 2020 – Actions (II)
E t d d t t
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
Extended customs gates
RoLa Carpathian mountains
RoLa Black Sea
Zero emission Danube vessels
Fiscal & legislative measures
Key performance indicators development
“Go inter-modal” programme
?
?
page 94 Source: Intermodal Strategy Romania 2020; KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
Actions generally appreciated but need to be prioritized with stakeholders, who are willing to support this. RoLa generally questionable.
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
General Transport Master Plan
I A il 2012 i i t lt i f
Framework of Romanian transport policy and actions
In April 2012, signing an agreement on consultancy services for elaboration (EUR 2 million) for General Transport Master Plan, funded by European funds and to be completed in 23 months
Deadline has been extended and final draft is expected in Spring 2014
Public consultation is planned afterwards
page 95 Source: Club Feroviar
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 47
Analysis of current CT: Legal Framework
Financial aid for CT operations: start-up or continuous support of CT services;
Catalogue of incentives for CT and their application in RO
Noservices;
Financial aid for investments in infrastructure, e.g. CT terminals;
Financial aid for investments in CT equipment;
Financial aid for investments in information systems, training etc;
Derogation from Directive 96/53/EC governing the weights and dimensions of heavy good vehicles.
Any special treatment as far as maximum dimensions and weight is concerned in force for vehicles moving in CT
No
No
No
No
No
page 96
concerned in force for vehicles moving in CT
Exemption from driving bans for road vehicles, e.g. weekend ban
Vehicle tax exemption of up to 100% for vehicles used exclusively in terminal pick-up and delivery operation**
Exemptions from road usage fees or tolls for vehicles in CTNo*Council Directive 96/53/EC “Maximum authorized weights and dimensions”**Directive 92/106/EEC “Establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport “
Source: KombiConsult analysis; COSMOS Round Table Romania 2013
No
No
Round Table Romania
Agenda
10:00 Welcome and Introduction
10:10 Status quo of the intermodal sector in Romania10:10 Status-quo of the intermodal sector in Romania
10:45 Discussion by topic:
Infrastructure
Ports and Terminals
Port Hinterland Services
Continental Services
Incentive Schemes
page 99
12:30-14:00 Joint Lunch
14:00 Continued Discussion and Actions
15:30 Conclusions
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 48
Evaluation of CT: SWOT-Analysis
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses
Integration into European trade Not competitive railway network Integration into European trade lanes via corridors
Not competitive railway network (outdated and worn railway means)
Deep-sea access via the Port of Constanta on own territory
Poor connectivity of main rail and port line without buffer capacity
Trade-oriented economy with skilled workforce
Low reliability of rail services due to infrastructure deficits and bordercrossing procedures (non Schengen regime)
Industrial sites producing also for Lack of prioritisation of investments
page 100
Industrial sites producing also for export goods (chemical, automotive, IT hardware)
Lack of prioritisation of investments and coordination with commercial stakeholders
Competent international and national companies in the rail and logistics sector
Only small increase of GDP per capita does not yet allow import of consumer goods
Source: KombiConsult analysis, updated 2013
Evaluation of CT: SWOT-Analysis
SWOT Analysis
Opportunities Threats
Geographical position with respect Redirection of transit flows to Geographical position with respect to important European development axis
Redirection of transit flows to parallel networks due to slow development of public rail infrastructure
Further stabilisation of Eastern Balkans and Turkey Europeanintegration will bring increase of transport flows, incl. Rail in transit
Redirection of port handling to Western ports due to lack of efficient rail link to/from Constanta
Transfer of less demanding Increase of number of bottlenecks
page 101
production to Asia and imports of goods via Black-Sea/Adriatic ports
in rail network due to slow improvement
Growth poles of industrial sites, agglomeration, logistics facilitiesand access to networks
Lack of confidence in implementing originally agreed “plans” and absorption of available EU funds
Source: KombiConsult analysis, updated 2013
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 49
Evaluation of CT: Volumes
Transit of continental transport with Turkey and Greece on land route via Hungary Romania Bulgaria because of EU access and
Development of intermodal transport, TEU, 2007 - 2020
route via Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria because of EU access and improved border crossing on this line, rather than Serbia
International maritime transport generated to/from the enlarged port of Constanta (Masterplan)
International continental transport due to the involvement of Romania in industrial products (cars, IT hardware, textiles) as well as chemical products
Several projects and efforts for increasing intermodal transport, e.g.
page 102
in 2013 Romania joined the VIKING project
Domestic maritime transport to/from port of Constanta
Domestic continental transport hardly to asses due to size, truck circulation and imbalance of traffic
Increase of intermodal volume by 9.6% p.a. (2020/2007)
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania 2010; KombiConsult analysis
Evaluation of CT: Volumes
Development of intermodal transport, TEU, 2007 - 2020
1.400.000
600.000
800.000
1.000.000
1.200.000
Transit
Export
Import
Domestic
9.6% p.a.
Growth path feasible 2009/2011!
page 103
0
200.000
400.000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2020
Domestic
Source: DIOMIS Report on Romania 2010; KombiConsult analysis
Growth path feasible 2009/2011!
But economy/transport too volatile
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 50
Evaluation CT market: Evolution of transport
The Romanian transport sector provides for various forms of logistics concepts including CT Operators for rail/road transport
Evolution of CT: Conclusions (1/3)
logistics concepts including CT-Operators for rail/road transport.
Private sector railway’s increased to gain market share of 53% in 2012, one of the highest in Europe. However, the “competition on rail” has not prevented from a total decrease of rail volumes.
After the fall of the iron curtain, and during the „accession period“ quick wins could be realised by road transport which was often more flexible, open to entrepreneurship and promoted by truck industry.
In contrast to that the rail sector lacks coherent infrastructure
page 104
investments, both in maintenance, refurbishment and new buildswhile improved roads can be used on sections, already
Alignment of TEN-T and RFC-Corridor on rail network were achieved by the RFC-Implementation Plan in November 2013, but also highlighting lines with limited capacity.
Improvement measures are (partly) identified but require effective implementation (financing, timing, monitoring).
Source: Round Table Meeting, KombiConsult analysis
Evaluation CT market: Evolution of transport
Accompanied intermodal transport (RoLa), only in 2005 and 2006 (Wels Arad/Oradea) until accession to EU
Evolution of CT: Conclusions (2/3)
(Wels-Arad/Oradea) until accession to EU.
Intermodal market dominated by container traffic with a clear importance of domestic (~ 60%, Constanta hinterland) over international transport (~ 40%, focusing on Western Europe).
Growth of intermodal transport is directly depending on the country‘s own economic performance and not generated by transit traffic.
Semi-trailers became standard equipment in international road transport and thus intermodal operation, but all rail loading gauges
page 105
are too small for continental CT, mainly due to tunnel profiles.
Intermodal terminals, generally, provide for sufficient handling capacity for the currently (low) handling volumes.
Training of personal engaged with transport decisions on the merits of intermodal transport would be required.
Source: Round Table Meeting, KombiConsult analysis
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 51
Evaluation CT market: Evolution of transport
An intermodal strategy is needed at country level to guide public and private investment The intended “dialogue” is appreciated by the
Evolution of CT: Conclusions (3/3)
private investment. The intended dialogue is appreciated by the stakeholders but did not take place, yet.
The strategy needs to be revised taking into account the recent market development, terminals developed by the private sector, shortcomings on rail infrastructure and transparent rules for application by market parties including realistic business plan.
The strategy should investigate (re-)activating incentive scheme in favour of intermodal transport such as
page 106
Derogation from Directive 96/53/EC governing the weights and dimensions of heavy good vehicles (“44 tonnes”).
Exemption from driving bans for road vehicles, e.g. weekend ban
Vehicle tax exemption of up to 100% for vehicles used exclusively in terminal pick-up and delivery operation
Exemptions from road usage fees or tolls for vehicles in CT
Source: Round Table Meeting, KombiConsult analysis
Conclusions
KombiConsult will send the (updated) transparencies to all invited participants by November 27 2013
What‘s next?
participants by November 27, 2013.
All invited participants were asked to validate the facts, findings and conclusions and send additional information or modification requests to KombiConsult by December 13, 2013.
KombiConsult will consolidate the comments received by than and send the final version to all participants by December 20, 2013.
Participants are invited to use the joint findings whenever possible to promote intermodal transport in Romania.
page 107
Additional Round Tables will take place in further countries(see next page)
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 52
Round Tables Series
Praha, 19.09.2013
Budapest, 16.10.2013
Zagreb, 3/2014
Wien, 6/2014(Final Conference)
Ljubljana, 23.4.2013
5th R d T bl
page 108
Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Sofia, 2/2014
5th Round TableBulgaria
25 February 2014
Announcement of the 2014 Report on CT in Europe
Survey on Intermodal Industry
2012 Report on Combined Transport in Europe
Business Models
Unaccompanied Transport
Accompanied Transport
Total Transport 2005/2009/2011
Outlook 2012/15
page 109
Service Providers
Source: www.kombiconsult.com
We kindly invite you to support us with statistical data for the 2014 report, that will be elaborated on the year 2013 in spring/summer 2014.
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 53
KombiConsult Profile
page 110
Intermodal Road Map Romania
CREAM Project Reports, www.cream-project.eu
DIOMIS P j t R t i /DIOMIS
Sources of Information
DIOMIS Project Reports, www.uic.org/DIOMIS
Report on Combined Transport in Europe 2012, www.kombiconsult.com
Club Feroviar compendium on Rail in Romania, 2013
CFR SA Network Statement 2013
Romanian Institute of Statistic, www.insse.ro
Implementation Plan for RFC7
Romanian Office of To rism (front page photo)
page 111
Romanian Office of Tourism (front page photo)
Websites, information and data provided by the Round Table Participants
COSMOS Round Table Romania Bucuresti, 20.11.2013
Road Map on Intermodal Transport in Romania - Final
© KombiConsult GmbH 54
Intermodal Road Map Romania
The present Road Map presentation has been compiled by one or more COSMOS partners with the support of third parties and may
Disclaimer
more COSMOS partners with the support of third parties and may contain business sensitive information.
You may use the content totally or selectively without changing the content of the single slides, if clearly identifying the source:
COSMOS Project, Intermodal Road Map Romania,Hacon / KombiConsult,2013, www.cosmos-project.eu
page 112
Thank you for your attention..
Klaus-Uwe Sondermann
KombiConsult GmbH
Zum Laurenburger Hof 76Zum Laurenburger Hof 76
60594 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Email: [email protected]
Phone: +49 69 244 32 93 172
Top Related