Download - Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Transcript
Page 1: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

You can listen to today’s webinar using your computer’s speakers

or you may dial into the teleconference.

If you would like to join the teleconference,

please dial 1.408.600.3600 and enter access code 927 649 233 #.

You will be on hold until the seminar begins.

#CLOwebinar

Reporting Talent Development

Metrics to Executives

Page 2: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Speaker: Jeffrey Berk

Chief Operating Officer

KnowledgeAdvisors Inc.

Moderator Daniel Margolis

Managing Editor

Chief Learning Officer magazine

#CLOwebinar

Reporting Talent Development

Metrics to Executives

Page 3: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

• Q&A

– Click on the Q&A panel (?)

in the bottom right corner

– Type in your question in the

space provided

– Click on “Send.”

Tools You Can Use

#CLOwebinar

Page 4: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

• Polling

– The poll will appear on the

right side of your screen

– Select the best option for

each question

– Click on “Submit”

#CLOwebinar

Tools You Can Use

Page 5: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Frequently Asked Questions

Will I receive a copy of the webinar recording?

YES

Will I receive a copy of the slides?

YES

Please allow up to 2 business days to receive these materials

#CLOwebinar

Page 6: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

#CLOwebinar

Daniel Margolis

Managing Editor

Chief Learning Officer magazine

Reporting Talent Development

Metrics to Executives

Page 7: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

#CLOwebinar

Jeffrey Berk

Chief Operating Officer

KnowledgeAdvisors Inc.

Reporting Talent Development

Metrics to Executives

Page 8: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Jeffrey Berk

Chief Operating Officer

Page 9: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Agenda

February 7, 2012 8 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Review elements that comprise balanced executive

reporting metrics

Discuss core attributes on a learning leader report

Present key components of a business manager report for

learning

Offer practical yet credible examples to link learning to

business impact

Page 10: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

About KnowledgeAdvisors

February 7, 2012 9 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

KnowledgeAdvisors will improve learning effectiveness within your

organization.

For organizations that utilize learning

and development to drive business

outcomes

KnowledgeAdvisors offers a learning

measurement solution …

That improves the effectiveness and

business impact of learning.

Page 11: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

About KnowledgeAdvisors

February 7, 2012 10 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 12: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Sample Customers

February 7, 2012 11 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 13: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Key Metrics

February 7, 2012 12 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 14: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Reporting What’s Important Outcome Metrics - Business Outcomes

Employee Contribution Margin

Productivity

Employee Retention

Employee Engagement

Profitability

Effectiveness Metrics – Program Performance

Delivery Quality

Knowledge Gain

Application to Job

Business Alignment

Value

Efficiency Metrics – Cost and Activity

# of Participants

% of Employees Trained

Total L&D Investment

L&D Investment per Participant

Courses Utilized

Classes Conducted

Instructors Utilized

Locations Used

February 7, 2012 13 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 15: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Strategic, Visible, Costly Programs

February 7, 2012 14

© 2009 KnowledgeAdvisors

Leadership Development

•Leader Retention

•Employee Engagement

•Employee Retention

•Leader Performance Ratings

•Leader Fiscal Management

Onboarding Program

•Time to Performance

•Performance Rating

•Employee Engagement

•Participant Confidence

•Competency Level

Sales Training

•Growth Rate

•Profit Margin

•Win Rate

•Time to Close

•Deal Size

Leadership

Training`

Q1 2010 Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011

Effectiveness

Rating

76% 80% 77% 75% 76%

Efficiency Rating 79% 78% 76% 78% 79%

Business

Outcome Rating

74% 74% 70% 70% 71%

Page 16: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Talent Development Reporting Principles

Executive initiative

championed by

KnowledgeAdvisors and

supported by leading

organizations

Standard framework to

measure learning: efficiency,

effectiveness and outcome

measures

Common terminology and

metrics

Inspired by GAAP http://www.knowledgeadvisors.com/tdrp

Page: 15 © 2011 KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 17: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Talent Development Reporting Process

February 7, 2012 16 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Business Outcomes – Organizational goals

– L&D’s impact on those goals

Effectiveness – Levels 1-5, timeliness

Efficiency – Costs

– Volume (participants, programs, classes, hours)

– Ratios

– Utilization rates

– Program and vendor management

Page 18: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Talent Development Reporting Principles

7-Feb-12 Page: 17 © 2011 KnowledgeAdvisors

Learning Executive

Reports

Business Executive

Summary Report

Business

Outcomes

Statement

Learning

Effectiveness

Statement

Learning

Efficiency

Statement

Executive

Reports

Statements

Data

Sources Learning

Management

System

Other Sources

(e.g HRIS, ERP,

CRM)

Financial Data Evaluation

System

Extract, convert and calculate

Standard Measures

L&D Summary

Report

L&D Program

Report

L&D Operational

Report

Business

Outcomes Efficiency Effectiveness Data Sets

Gu

idin

g P

rinc

iple

s

Page 19: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

February 7, 2012 18 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Dashboards, Scorecards, Statements

Page 20: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

L&D Summary Report

February 7, 2012 19 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 21: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

L&D Executive Report

February 7, 2012 20 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Narrative

Text and Charts

Multiple Views

Audience

L&D Executives

L&D Management

Discuss it

90 minutes

Quarterly meeting

Page 22: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Executive Report

February 7, 2012 21 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Narrative

Text and Charts

Multiple Views

Audience

Business Executives

Line Management

Discuss it

90 minutes

Quarterly meeting

Page 23: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Dashboard Case Study

February 7, 2012 22 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Background: Commercial

insurance company

Business Issue: Visual, concise

place for learning metrics

Analytics Solution: Leveraged

dashboards to build custom, robust

solution

Analytics Results: Real-time

access to impact, cost, cycle-time,

satisfaction, quality and volume

dashboards.

Page 24: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Executive Tab

February 7, 2012 23 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 25: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Quality Tab

February 7, 2012 24 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

What we learn

Ensure performance is consistent over time and compare most recent quarter’s performance to the norm

Overall survey scores, quarterly fluctuation, scores by curriculum area

Instructor ratings, identify areas to improve

Overall instructor & course scores against benchmarks

Top/bottom rated courses based on courseware scores and associated comments

Page 26: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Volume Tab

February 7, 2012 25 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

What we learn

Total hours delivered,

number of completions

Breakout of volume by

business / function and

learning method

(eLearning, Instructor Led)

Trends in volume over time

Compare trends in volume

by usage rates / trends of

licensed course libraries,

curriculum areas (are we

buying more than we need?

Are we maximizing our

investment?)

Page 27: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Six Approaches to Align Learning to Impact

February 7, 2012 26 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Smart Sheets

Human Capital Approach

Advanced Business Results Evaluation

Business Impact Templates

Actual Results Correlations

Typically

employs

surveys

Requires actual results

data and advanced

analysis techniques

Causal

Modeling

Complex

Simple

Low

Investment

High

Investment Once you determine

Business Impact what

analysis is appropriate,

select a method:

Page 28: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Smile Sheet to Smart Sheet

February 7, 2012 27 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 29: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Smart Sheet in Practice

February 7, 2012 28 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Review programs

that aren’t providing

impact to the

business

“We need our measurement tools

and process now more than ever; if

we don’t have access to this data,

how will we be able to make

intelligent decisions on what to cut?”

- KnowledgeAdvisors Client

Page 30: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Results Evaluation Approach

February 7, 2012 29 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Page 31: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Impact Template in Practice

February 7, 2012 30 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Background: Large CPG based in

Canada, sales training

Business Issue: Visible sales

program, requested to link between

it and sales results

Analytics Solution: Used process

to evaluate sales change and

impact training had on sales

Analytics Results: 7% increase in

sales, 20% of the increase was due

to training, this was a $74,000

increase per sales person when the

training was $5000 per person

Page 32: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Actual Results Correlations

February 7, 2012 31 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

This is a method where actual results can be input or imported at an

aggregate, periodic frequency. It is then correlated in time periods

against training evaluation data for impact indicators.

The example below is from sales data and sale training.

Page 33: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

February 7, 2012 32 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Measurement Success Stories

Executive Program for Government Entity:

An executive leadership program generated more

than double the impact of typical leadership programs

equating to nearly 70% on-the-job application and a 2

to 1 benefit to cost ratio.

Strategic Sales Training

A strategic sales training program generated $74,000

in increased sales per sales person for a $5,000 per

person investment. This data was the catalyst that

convinced management to expand the program to

other sales territories.

Front-Line Staff New Hire Program

An on-boarding program for front-line staff brought

an additional 15,000 hours of increased productivity to

the business as a result of the increased speed to

competency. This analysis helped save a new hire

program that was questioned by management.

Page 34: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Relevant Additional Examples

February 7, 2012 33 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Simple Survey

Asked high performers to rate their high

impact factors

92% effective supply chain

89% informal learning tools

73% formal learning programs

32% technology

14% compensation

Clearly learning contributes to high

performance

Source: Dr. John Sullivan, Presentation at Analytics Symposium

Page 35: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Relevant Additional Examples

February 7, 2012 34 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Basic Correlation

Correlate customer service scores with use of

learning tools and programs

Identified high training use CSR (customer

service reps) based on tools used, programs

completed and grouped into high and low use

Compared CSR customer satisfaction score

with learning use

Results: Top 10% customer satisfaction were

also in the high learning group, bottom 10%

were in the low learning group.

Source: Dr. John Sullivan, Presentation at Analytics Symposium

Page 36: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Relevant Additional Examples

February 7, 2012 35 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Before vs. After

Hypothesis was that a learning support

tool could improve innovation

Before the learning tool, 15% of

employees contributed innovation ideas

After the learning tool, 24% of employees

contributed innovation ideas

Its easy to see the ‘After’ contribution

Source: Dr. John Sullivan, Presentation at Analytics Symposium

Page 37: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Relevant Additional Examples

February 7, 2012 36 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Control Group (side by side)

Determine if learning projects influenced

employee retention

Employees with no learning projects

averaged a turnover rate of 21%

Employees with 2 or more learning

projects averaged a turnover rate of 2%

Clearly the control group vs. learning

group shows a difference

Source: Dr. John Sullivan, Presentation at Analytics Symposium

Page 38: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Business Relevant Additional Examples

February 7, 2012 37 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors

Take it in, Take it out

Sales team use of social media learning

tool to see impact on sales results

Tool put In, sales went up 34%

Tool taken Out, sales went down 29%

Essentially, without the tool sales returned

to where they were originally. Clearly the

tool made a difference

Source: Dr. John Sullivan, Presentation at Analytics Symposium

Page 39: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Measurement Sustainability

February 7, 2012 38 © 2011, KnowledgeAdvisors 2/7/2012 © 2010 KnowledgeAdvisors

Processes

Standards, Tools

Technology

Data Utilization

• Established and consistent

processes, technologies and

communications for

measurement

• Broad base of skills in

analytics and

measurement and strong

capabilities in end-to-end

measurement methods

• Standardization for a consistent

and single point of analytics with

integration to and from feeder

systems

• Roles and accountabilities for

metrics are defined with

consistent expectations on

what should be measured.

• Strong desire to use the data for

decision making

• Maturity in how data is reported

and used to improve end to end

talent processes

• Strong leadership for driving measurement

with governance to support it.

• Standards have been created for data collection

• Data integrity exists

• Culture supports and drives

need for standards and

common talent development

processes and measurement

3

5

8

1

2

3

4

6

7

Processes

Standards, Tools

Technology

Data Utilization

Skills / Behaviors

Leadership

Roles

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 41: Reporting Talent Development Metrics to Executives

Join Our Next CLO Webinar

Driving Your Organization’s Culture by Building

Learning Relationships for Mutual Benefit

Tuesday, March 22, 2012

CLO Webinars start at 2 p.m. Eastern / 11 a.m. Pacific

Register at www.clomedia.com/events

Join the CLO Network: http://network.clomedia.com/

#CLOwebinar