RBEC in 2007 and 2008
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
2
• Balanced Score Card• Analysis of delivery trends• Outlook for 2008• Priorities for 2008
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Outline of the presentation
3
Balanced Score Card: key indicators 1/3
• Programme delivery: increased by 8% from 2006 to 2007 (corporately a decline of 5%)
• Resource mobilization: up 5% in 2006-07 (RBAP, RBAS up 44%, RBA up 7%, RBLAC down 6.5%)
• Cost recovery /government cost sharing: RBEC rate, 2.86% in 2007, below 3% corporate rate (3.82% without Poland)
• Cost recovery from TF and 3rd party cost sharing: RBEC rate, 5.77%, is above minimum 5% and highest in UNDP
58% 27% 15%RBEC 2007 Results
61% 24% 15%All COs 2007 Results
81% 8% 11%RBEC 2007 Results
70% 11% 19%All COs 2007 Results
68% 12% 20%RBEC 2007 Results
71% 8% 21%All COs 2007 Results
33% 50% 17%RBEC 2007 Results
49% 40% 11%All COs 2007 Results
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
4
Balanced Score Card: key indicators 2/3
• Implementation of audit recommendations: 100% compliance with OAPR standards
• NEX Audit Management: 17 Cos (74%) meet OAPR requirements, above corporate average
• MOSS compliance: 100% compliant with MOSS
• Financial data quality: only one CO does not meet corporate requirements
• Management efficiency ratio - admin/total expenditure - RBEC average 11.1% vs. 9.8 % target
100% 0% 0%RBEC 2007 Results
97% 3% 0%All COs 2007 Results
74% 22% 4%RBEC 2007 Results
47% 28% 25%All COs 2007 Results
100% 0% 0%RBEC 2007 Results
74% 0% 26%All COs 2007 Results
68% 24% 8%RBEC 2007 Results
55% 23% 22%All COs 2007 Results
96% 0% 4%RBEC 2007 Results
88% 6% 6%All COs 2007 Results
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
5
Balanced Score Card: key indicators 3/3
• Staff perception of work environment (GSS): slightly ahead of corporate average
• Knowledge networks participation and learning: ahead of corporate average
• Gender balance in professional positions: 4 more country offices achieved gender balance in 2007.
17% 66% 17%RBEC 2007 Results
10% 71% 19%All COs 2007 Results
54% 19% 27%RBEC 2007 Results
41% 29% 30%All COs 2007 Results
39% 46% 15%RBEC 2007 Results
26% 48% 26%All COs 2007 Results
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
6
Bureau 2006 2007 Y/Y Change
RBLAC $1,411,941 $1,310,918 -7.15%
RBAP $727,851 $732,610 0.65%
RBA $900,906 $694,373 -22.93%
RBAS $372,141 $428,992 15.28%
RBEC $308,703 $ 335,734 8.76%
• RBEC Total $ 335,7 mln – smallest in UNDP• Growth of 8.76% - one of two regions growing
Delivery trends: RBEC vs. other Bureaux
2006-07 programme delivery by region, US$ thous.
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
7
Delivery trends: RBEC analysis
Fastest growing2007/2006, %
Croatia 196%Montenegro 107%
Moldova 69%Belarus 69%Turkey 52%Serbia 47%
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Delivery size 2006 % of RBEC delivery 2007 % of RBEC
delivery
$ 1-6 mln 8 8% 5 4%
$6-12 mln 5 14% 9 23%
$12 mln & up 14 78% 13 72%
COs by delivery size, 2006-07
COs by growth rate, 2007
Delivery trend Number of COs
% of RBEC delivery
Average increase /
decline
Declining 8 23% -28%
Stagnating (0-15%) 5 20% 8%
Growing (15% and up) 14 57% 55%
8
Delivery trends: underlying sustainability
1. External factors: RBEC delivery growth would be 14.5% without Bulgaria
2. Source of funds: non core resources = 86%. Major donors: Govt, EU, GFATM, GEF
3. Contribution of the largest (No 1) project - 26% of ‘07 delivery (in 6 COs - over 40% of delivery)
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
9
Outlook for 2008 and beyondRBEC Purchasing Power: 2006-07 vs. 2008-09
DCU = Development Capacity Unit = Project manager + Consultant, Advisor + 1 Project support Staff
Purchasing Power = No. of DCUs COs can purchase in the biennium (Biennium TRAC allocation / Average cost of the DCU)
* DCU costs barely keep up with dollar depreciation
Country % inc – decrease in TRAC 1-2 allocations
DCU cost increase
% increase - decrease purchasing power
Ukraine -32% 115% -68%Kosovo -54% 23% -63%Serbia -41% 23% -52%
Bulgaria -29% 41% -50%Armenia -21% 49% -47%Albania -40% 17% -49%
BiH -36% 16% -45%Turkmenistan -30% 21% -42%
Azerbaijan -19% 36% -40%Georgia -26% 20% -39%Belarus -18% 23% -34%
Romania -17% 25% -34%Macedonia -12% 23% -29%
Turkey -13% 21% -28%Moldova -14% 17% -26%Croatia -5% 22% -22%
Kazakhstan 7% 36% -21%Russia 13% 23% -8%
Kyrgyzstan 50% 32% 13%Montenegro 52% 23% 23%
Tajikistan 56% 21% 29%Uzbekistan 115% 13% 89%
RBEC Averages 6% 29% -20%BRC 0.12% 19% -18%
10
TREND: 8 out of 25 COs set lower delivery targets vs ’07
FACT: 1st quarter delivery is $7 mln lower than in ‘07(17 COs have a decline)
Outlook for 2008 and beyondDelivery vs. Resource Mobilization
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
US$ thous.
11
• Running a CO is like riding a bicycle:
Priorities for 2008Delivery vs. Impact
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Level of delivery = speedImpact = where does it bring you
12
• Great in local governance / ABD
• Visibility in social inclusion policies
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Priorities for 2008Impact: where are we going?
EU New Member States or Accession StatesLow-income countries
• Environment & Energy BoomingFirst MDG Carbon ProjectStaved off worse-case scenario with GEF
13
1. Go-to agency for institutional development2. Scale up of local development, social inclusion3. East-East cooperation network4. Honest broker and advocate
+ Energy and Environment
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Priorities for 2008Impact: where do we want to arrive?
14
• Coordinated advocacy w/EU and other donors• Advancing partnerships (Govt, EC, OSI,CEDB, EBRD)
• Effective internal communications
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Priorities for 2008Impact: how to get there? 1/2
Analysis of delivery vs. sustainability issues Learning from our work (self-reflection) Working together
15
• Consolidating BRC role and operations
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Priorities for 2008Impact: how to get there? 2/2
Accountability, evaluation, working for results
New management More prioritization and feedback
• In New York: More systematic monitoring and feedback Building (sub-) regional synergies Far more responsiveness
• Strategic HR management
16
• Clear message from Oslo: mainstreaming lessons from the pilots as a priority
• Using the wave of new UNDAFs in RBEC as a unique strategic opportunity
• Relying on an inter-agency process for strategic prioritization (RDT role in strategy review)
Regional RR meeting Bratislava 21-23 April 2008
Priorities for 2008Delivering as One
Top Related