Life Enriching Agriculture Products
Biomassters Global, Inc.
Since 1996
www.biomassters.com
PRESENTION
SUGARCANE
1
RESULTS YOU CAN EXPECT WHEN USING OUR PRODUCTS ♦ Increased quality and quantity of crop yield – up to 30% ♦ Lush green foliage
♦ 25% to 50% reduction in use of chemical fertilizers in first year ♦ Puts Life back into the Soils
♦ Increased organic matter & soil fertility ♦ Accelerated blooming
♦ Helps to balance the pH factor of the soil ♦ Increased mineralization
♦ Optimizes maturation of crops ♦ Increased BRIX
MicroSoil®
CLEAN/GREEN
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Above and Beyond Organics™
EnRich™ N48 BioTech/AgriZymes™
PureFulvic™
Trace Minerals
Increase Crop Yields By 15% to 30% ♦ Reduce Fertilzer Costs By 25% to 50%
MicroSoil®’s Life Enriching Agriculture Products
www.biomassters.com 2
The Future of the Sugarcane IndustryCLEAN/GREEN Environmental Technologies
A Worldwide Trend in the Agriculture IndustryReduce chemical fertilizers & elevate crop production
Soils all over the world are unique with various nutrient compositions and various crops are grown in these soils, therefore, Biomassters Global has brought our products, knowledge, experience and expertise into the 21st century, MicroSoil®’s TailorMade™ Fertilization Protocols and Solutions is a customized farming method that is specific to each farm and the specific crop being grown. Our protocols are based on an A&L Labs soil analysis test of all macro-nutrients, micro-nutrients, Ph, CEC and Base Saturation, plus a Fertilizer Questionnaire completed by the grower to determine current water & fertilizer application rates, usage and practices. Once these factors are known, we will review the data, evaluate the nutrient needs of the crop to be grown on referenced soils, then we will provide our recommendations utilizing our proven protocols & products in conjunction with other locally available organic materials and sometimes with lesser amounts of inorganic materials. These materials and methods are done strictly in accord with nature’s natural processes and rhythms which have stood the test of time since the beginning of life on this planet. MicroSoil®'s Proven Products Worldwide Since 1996
Benefits & Results of MicroSoil®’s TailorMade Fertilization Solutions™ ♦ Increase quantity of crop yield – up to 30%
♦ Reduce chemical fertilizers by 25% TO 50% IN FIRST YEAR
♦ Increased sugar content - BRIX (nutrient uptake)
♦ Reduce fertilization costs by 20% to 40% in first year
♦ Lush green foliage with accelerated blooming
♦ Increased organic matter & soil fertility
♦Helps to balance the pH factor of the soil
♦ Optimizes seed germination & maturation of plants
♦ Increased profitability
Great for Public Relations
♦ ALL NATURAL ♦ Non Toxic ♦ Non Hazardous
100% Safe for People, Plants and Pets
Biomassters Global, Inc. Desde 1996 4894 W. Lone Mountain Rd. Suite # 191, Las Vegas, Nevada 89130
Telefono: 702-645-1390 Fax: 702-656-2305 Email: [email protected]
Sitio Web de Agricultura: www.biomassters.com Sitio Web de Ethanol: http://home.earthlink.net/~test-results2/
3
Biomassters Global, Inc. SINCE 1996 4894 West Lone Mountain Road Suite 191 Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 USA
Telephone: (+1) 702-645-1390 Fax: (+1) 702-656-2305 Email: [email protected]
Agriculture Website: www.biomassters.com Ethanol Website: http://home.earthlink.net/~test-results2/
Boron problems in Mexico – No problem
The Sugar Mill, San Francisco de
Ameca, in Ameca, Jalisco, Mexico
In 2013, when George Aguilar first approached us with the
problems being confronted in a Sugar Cane farm of 10,000
Hectares of Boron laden soils, asking if MicroSoil® would
help reduce the presence of boron, we simply had no clue,
so we suggested they just try our MicroSoil® product and a
basic protocol which included molasses, since there was
very low soil organic matter. We only asked George one
thing. Test is the area with the highest concentration of
boron you can find. So they did and here is George’s report
of the results:
George Aguilar: “Don, in the year 2013, the yield was 40
tons per Ha and the test was done in the worst area in the
whole complex, which was what you suggested. We added
20 Liters of Molasses + 100 Liters of Water + 1 Liter of
MicroSoil. The result was 70 Tons per Ha in this year
sugar crop, 2014”. GEO
IMPORTANT: At no time did George Aguilar or Biomassters Global, Inc. make any
statements or claims that our MicroSoil® product would reduce or modify the boron conditions
in these soils. However, it seems that, both in high salty and/or boron laden soil conditions,
when you can elevate the organic matter and inject our MicroSoil® product utilizing our
protocols, much better crops and higher crop yields can be realized, as demonstrated by the
Sugar Mill, San Francisco de Ameca.
We appreciate their cooperation with Mr. Aguilar in giving our MicroSoil® product an
opportunity to demonstrate one of the many benefits of what can be done when our MicroSoil®
Life Enriching Agriculture Products and Protocols are implemented.
4
Biomassters Global, Inc. SINCE 1996 4894 West Lone Mountain Road Suite 191 Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 USA
Telephone: (+1) 702-645-1390 Fax: (+1) 702-656-2305 Email: [email protected]
Agriculture Website: www.biomassters.com Ethanol Website: http://home.earthlink.net/~test-results2/
Test for Sugar Content of Sugar Cane Utilizing MicroSoil®
Conducted in Yucatan, Mexico in1998
This test was primarily conducted to determine whether or not MicroSoil would affect the sugar content of
sugar cane. The Brix scale and Test were used to measure the results. The soils where this test was conducted
were in very poor condition, as nothing had ever been applied on them due to a lack of funds.
General Observations:
This test was very significant as it proves that:
1. MicroSoil by itself should not be used in poor soils with low nitrogen content
2. MicroSoil works extremely well with reduced amounts of chemical fertilizers
3. MicroSoil was the determining factor in elevating the sugar content.
In reference to #1 above, please note that in all our protocols we state categorically that MicroSoil needs at least
2% organic matter (i.e. 80 lbs. of nitrogen per acre or 100 kg of nitrogen per hectare) in order for MicroSoil to
be effective. One half of the recommended amount of nitrogen is needed for the microorganisms to proliferate
and the other half is needed by the plants in order to grow. If a soil has only one half of the recommended 2%
organic matter, then the soil microorganisms will use it up before the plants have a chance to benefit from it
and, therefore, the plants will suffer. This is precisely what happened when only MicroSoil was used in these
extremely poor soils. On the other hand, when chemical fertilizers were used exclusively, the plants also
suffered due to the lack of balance between the macronutrients and micronutrients. However, when both a
reduced amount of chemical fertilizer was used along with MicroSoil, the soil was provided with the necessary
nutrients and in adequate amounts causing the plants to flourish.
MicroSoil is the catalyst which enhances and balances the macronutrients and micronutrients which is the key
to growing larger and healthier crops, however, MicroSoil works within certain parameters which include a pH
between 5.5-7.5, a nitrogen content equivalent to 2% organic matter and adequate macronutrients and
micronutrients. A recommended protocol based on the results of a simple soil analysis can greatly increase the
chances of having a great harvest.
Test Results:
A. As expected where only MicroSoil was applied in soil with very low nitrogen content, the sugar cane
had to be harvested early due to weak growth.
B. Where the Control crop was fertilized with chemicals 17-17-17, although the sugar cane was slightly
taller, the stalks were thinner. (See GROSS COMPARISON diagram below)
C. The MicroSoil crop with reduced chemical fertilizer 17-17-17, was much greener and the stalks were
much thicker in size. One liter of MicroSoil was applied, along with 350 kg of 17-17-17 and 150 kg of urea. In
the following photograph you will notice that the distance between nodules was greater in the control group
than in those where the MicroSoil was used, but the growth is very uneven as evidenced in the last 3 nodules in
which the control reaches up to 16.6 cm but then drops drastically to 6.7 cm. Those on which MicroSoil was
used, maintained a balanced growth of more or less 12 cm.
5
D. As shown in the tables below, the sugar content of the MicroSoil crop yielded a 2.48 degree* increase in
sugar, which calculates to an astonishing 10.69% higher sugar content.
E. Note the difference in the root structures as seen in the photograph. The roots of the MicroSoil plant are
much larger and more fully developed.
MicroSoil treated Sugar Cane
is larger with better color and
sugar content than normal plants
Since the purpose of the test was specifically to
test the sugar content, the size (weight) of the
crop yield, estimated to be 30% higher, was not
accurately measured. Please refer to the tables
below for detailed results.
*The Brix Scale: 1 degree on the Brix scale is the
equivalent of 18 grams of sugar per liter.
The thickness between nodules is shown in the
picture above. In the diagram on the right, a
comparison of the largest nodule cross-sections is
presented graphically.
A complete detailed comparison of the nodule sizes
and the sugar content between the Control plants
and the MicroSoil treated plants is presented in
tabular form below.
MicroSoil® results in consistently larger nodule cross-sections than normal
6
SUGAR CANE STUDY TABLE
FIRST STAGE: November 14, 1997 - 3 MONTHS AFTER APPLICATION OF MICROSOIL
DISTANCE BETWEEN NODULES (cm)
Nodules 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TOTAL
MicroSoil 2.07 4.43 8.76 11.67 13.1 12 12.3 12.17 76.5
Control 2.55 4.4 8.65 13.05 15.35 16.6 12 6.7 79.3
Difference -0.48 0.03 0.11 -1.38 -2.25 -4.6 0.3 5.47 -2.8
THICKNESS BETWEEN NODULES (cm)
Nodules 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TOTAL
MicroSoil 3.16 3.03 2.86 2.73 2.56 2.53 2.53 2.6 22
Control 2.6 2.8 2.65 2.65 2.5 2.45 2.2 2.3 20.15
Difference 0.56 0.23 0.21 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.33 0.3 1.85
SECOND STAGE: June 22, 1998 - (5 Samples) AT HARVEST
DEGREES (*BRIX SCALE)
MicroSoil 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL AVG
BASE 26.8 25.2 27 27 26 132 26.4
MEDIUM 26.8 23.8 26 26 25 127.6 25.52
HIGH 27 22.5 26 25 25 125.5 25.1
77.02
TOTAL AVERAGE IN DEGREES (*BRIX SCALE) 25.67
DEGREES (*BRIX SCALE)
CONTROL 1 2 3 TOTAL AVG
BASE 21 25.2 25 71.2 23.73
MEDIUM 21 23 25 69 23
HIGH 21.5 23 24 68.5 22.83
69.56
TOTAL AVERAGE IN DEGREES (*BRIX SCALE) 23.19
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TREATMENTS
(The equivalent of 10.69% increase in sugar) 2.48
*Brix is a scale for measuring the density or concentration of sugar in solution.
7
MicroSoil® on Sugar CaneMicroSoil® on Sugar Cane
Ingenio Atencingo S AIngenio Atencingo, S.A.
Atencingo, PUE
2005 ‐ 2006
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 8
ProtocolProtocol
Sugar Cane Plantation; Atencingo/Izucar de Matamoros, Pue.Sugar Cane Plantation; Atencingo/Izucar de Matamoros, Pue.Crop; Sugar CaneVariety; 51(MEX 57 0 473)Cuts; 1st Machete (dry) Cycle R1y yLocation; Pequena propeidad de Tilapa, PueblaIrrigation; Well waterIrrigation depth; 10 to 12 cmIrrigation frequency; 23 – 30 daysType of soil; light sand entrance (ATOCLE)Harvested; One month before testing of parameters N f t i l d 2 20% f 1 H 2 000 2No of trials and area; 2, 20% of 1 Ha = 2,000m2
Parcel size/test; 217.8m2
Distance between rows; 1.10mLength of each row; 33 meters
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Length of each row; 33 meters
9
Fertilizer program; t li tiFertilizer program; two applications
25% Fertilizer 50% Fertilizer 100% Fertilizer25% FertilizerTreatment A
50% FertilizerTreatment B
100% Fertilizer Treatment C
MicroSoil® 2 Lt. MicroSoil® 2 Lt.
Natural Soil 10 Lt. Natural Soil 10 Lt.
Vitamin B12 Vitamin B12
Molasses 8kg Molasses 8kg
NPK 20‐10‐10 200kg NPK 20‐10‐10 400kg NPK 20‐10‐10 800kg
Ammonium sulfate 200kg
Ammonium sulfate 400kg
Ammonium sulfate 800kg
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 10
Condition of soil and Crop at the time of first fertilizer application
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 11
Condition Crop at the time of second fertilizer application
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 12
Brix Values
17.6
Treatment Brix Value
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
16.8216 8
1717.217.4
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
17.39
l16.216.416.616.8
C 100% Fertilizer 16.33
15.816
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 14
Saccharine
15.4
Treatment Saccharine
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
14.89 14.815
15.2
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
15.32
l14.214.414.6
C 100% Fertilizer 14.33
13.814
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 15
Purity
88.8
Treatment Purity
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
88.5688 2
88.4
88.6
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
88.08
l 87 6
87.8
88
88.2
C 100% Fertilizer 87.81
87.4
87.6
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 16
Percent Moisture Content
73.6
Treatment % Moisture
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
72.7072 8
7373.273.4
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
72.41
l72.272.472.672.8
C 100% Fertilizer 73.48
71.872
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 17
Damaged crops
0.3
Treatment Percent
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
0.18 0.2
0.25
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
0.18
l 0 05
0.1
0.15
C 100% Fertilizer 0.28
0
0.05
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 18
Fiber
12.3
Treatment Fiber
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
12.24 12.1
12.2
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
12.10
l 11 8
11.9
12
C 100% Fertilizer 11.91
11.7
11.8
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 19
Grinding Stalk per Hectare
140000
Treatment Number
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
122,850130000
135000
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
131,950
l120000
125000
C 100% Fertilizer 134,680
115000
120000
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 22
Yield per Hectare
120
Treatment Tons
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
73.08 80
100
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
102.36
l 20
40
60
C 100% Fertilizer 92.02
0
20
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 23
Stalk Height
195
Treatment Centimeter
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
178.9185
190
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
193.5
l175
180
C 100% Fertilizer 188.5
170
175
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 24
Average Stalk Weight
900
Treatment Gram
A MicroSoil® 25% F tili
595500600700800
Fertilizer
B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
777
l200300400500
C 100% Fertilizer 684
0100
A MicroSoil®, B MicroSoil®, C 100% F25% F 50% F
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 25
Yield
Treatment Yield per Treatment
Yield per Hectare Revenue (@ $ 400/ton),
Mexican Peso
A MicroSoil® 25% Fertilizer
1,640 Kg 73,083.79 Kg $ 29,232.00
B Mi S il® 50% 2 297 K 102 361 90 K $ 40 944 00B MicroSoil® 50% Fertilizer
2,297 Kg 102,361.90 Kg $ 40,944.00
C 100% Fertilizer 2,065 Kg 92,023.80 Kg $ 36,808.00
Created 2008Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 26
SUGAR CANE
Fertilization of sugarcane test using
MICROSOIL® and other organic matter,
instead of chemical fertilization.
Tests were conducted by the
ATENZINGO SUGAR REFINERY
IN PUEBLA MEXICO
MEXICO
2005 - 2006
27
General Test Data
* CULTIVATION: SUGAR CANE
• VARIETY: 51 (MEX 57-473)
• CUTS: SOCA
• TREATMENTS: 3 WITH 2 REPETITIONS
• FERTILIZATION: 1,600 KG IN 2 APPLICATIONS
• SAMPLE PARCEL: 217.80 M2 / REPETITION
• SOIL TYPE: CLEAR AND SANDY SOIL
• WATERING: ROTATED EVERY 20 DAYS
• DURATION OF TEST: 12 MONTHS (MARCH 2005 TO MARCH 2006
29
TREATMENTS
TREATMENT A
TREATMENT
B TREATMENT C
TECHNOLOGICAL
PACKAGE + 25 %
CHEMICAL FERTILIZER
TECHNOLOGICAL
PACKAGE + 50 %
CHEMICAL FERTILIZER
100 % CHEMICAL
FERTILIZATION
(WITNESS)
MICROSOIL® MICROSOIL®
HUMIC ACIDS HUMIC ACIDS
VITAMIN B12 VITAMIN B12
MOLASSES MOLASSES
FORMULA 20-10-10 FORMULA 20-10-10 FORMULA 20-10-10
AMONIA SULFATE AMONIA SULFATE AMONIA SULFATE
30
CROP YEILDS (TONS)
73,08
102,36
92,02
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TREATMENT
35
YIELD / TOTAL-”CRUSHED STALKS”
13
19
50
13
46
80
73
08
0
10
23
60
92
02
0
12
28
50
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
TALLOS MOLEDEROS/HA RENDIMIENTO TON/HA
TREATMENT
36
BRIX-”SUGAR CONTENT”
16,82
17,39
16,33
15,8
16
16,2
16,4
16,6
16,8
17
17,2
17,4
17,6
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)EN COSECHA 19.59
TREATMENT
38
SUCROSE-”SUGAR CONTENT
14,89
15,32
14,33
13,8
14
14,2
14,4
14,6
14,8
15
15,2
15,4
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)
EN COSECHA 17,70
TREATMENT
39
PURITY
88,56
88,08
87,81
87,40
87,60
87,80
88,00
88,20
88,40
88,60
88,80
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)
B (MS+50% FQ)
C (100% FQ)EN COSECHA 90.37
TREATMENT
40
FIBER
12,24
12,1
11,91
11,7
11,8
11,9
12
12,1
12,2
12,3
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
EN COSECHA 11.10
TREATMENT
41
72,7
72,41
73,48
71,8
72
72,2
72,4
72,6
72,8
73
73,2
73,4
73,6
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
% OF HUMIDITY
EN COSECHA 69.50
TREATMENT
42
REDUCTORES- “REDUCTIONS”
0,18 0,18
0,28
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
A (MS+25% FQ) B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
TRATAMIENTOS
A (MS+25% FQ)B (MS+50% FQ) C (100% FQ)
EN COSECHA 0.132
TREATMENT
AT HARVEST 0.132
43
TREATMENT
YIELD
PER HECTARE
(TON)
PRICE PER
TON OF
SUGAR CANE
GROSS INCOME
PER HECTARE
A 73.10 $37.00 USD $2,709.00 USD
B 102.40 $37.00 USD $ 3,795.00 USD
C 92.00 $37.00 USD $ 3,409.00 USD
INCOME PER HECTARE
45
COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS
TREATMENT
NET INCOME
PER HECTARE
FERTILIZATION
COST PER
HECTARE
NET PER
HECTARE
A $2,709.00 USD $250.00 USD $2,458.00 USD
B $3,795.00 USD $350.00 USD $3,445.00 USD
C $3,409.00 USD $407.00 USD $3,002.00 USD
46
COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS
TREATMENT “B” GENERATED AN
ADDITIONAL INCOME OF $ 442.00 USD PER HECTARE OR $175.00 PER US ACRE
($ 4,780.00 Mexican Pecos Per Hectare)
47
CONCLUSION
MICROSOIL® DEMONSTRATED THAT WITH
ITS USE ON SUGARCANE:
• A BETTER ASSILIMATION OF NUTRIENTS
(MACROS AND MICROS).
• A 50% SAVINGS IN CHEMICAL FERTILIZER
• GREATER PRODUCTION (10 TON
MAS/HECTARE)
• GREATER INCOME FOR THE PRODUCER
$ 442.00 USD Per Hectare ($ 4,780.00 Pecos Per HECTARE )
48
Biomassters Global, Inc. SINCE 1996 4894 West Lone Mountain Road Suite 191 Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 USA
Telephone: (+1) 702-645-1390 Fax: (+1) 702-656-2305 Email: [email protected] Agriculture Website: www.biomassters.com Ethanol Website: http://home.earthlink.net/~test-results2/
Sorghum Cultivation
Piche Campeche, Mexico
January – May 2007
Tests performed by:
Eng. Rodolfo Pinzon; Klaersa Biotraramientos
Eng. Roberto Mis; Agricola Santa Genoveva
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 50
Sow Date January 17, 2007 Seed Variety; 8282 Pionne
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Control Rooting MicroSoil® 75 Kg. Urea N46 70 Kg. Urea N46
5 Lt. Rooting 1 Lt. MicroSoil®
85 Kg. MAP (11-52) 85 Kg. MAP (11-52) 5 Lt. Montys (liquid carbon)
30 Kg Potassium Chloride 32 Kg Potassium Chloride 5 Lt. Natural Soil
The fertilizers was applied through the irrigation system
Normal fertilizers was applied through the irrigation system, the Rooting was applied in band while being sowed
Normal fertilizers was not applied. The recommended MicroSoil® treatment was applied on the sorghum loin with bag sprinklers in 200 Lt. of water
51
Root Development
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Important; Volume of Adventitious Roots
53
Soil Texture; one week before harvest
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Control Rooting MicroSoil® Compacted soil Moderately compacted soil Porous soil
Few adventitious roots and with horizontal growth
Great development of the anchorage roots
The soil comes of the root very easily
Little radicular development
Little development of the adventitious roots
The root comes out of the soil very easily
Humid soil due to water retention
58
View of fields; one week before harvest
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA
MicroSoil® Control
59
Fruiting with MicroSoil®; one week before harvest
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA 60
Crop conditions; one week before harvest
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Control MicroSoil®
Non uniform growth of the plants Uniform plant growth, and an intense
green color
Small fruits Good size crops, approximately 25 cm
Space between the trenched, the soil can be seen
No space between the trenches, the soil can not be seen thanks to good vegetative
growth
61
Production
Created 2008 Biomassters, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Kg/Ha Difference
Kg/Ha Difference %
MicroSoil® 5,510
Control 4,800 -710 -12.89
Rooting 4,563 -937 -17.19
62
PRODUCCION
4000
5000
TESTIGO PAQUETE ROOTING PAQUETE MicroSoil®
PROGRAMA
Kg
s./H
a.
4,563
4,8005,510
63
COSTO POR HECTAREA
CANTIDAD COSTOCANTIDA
DCOSTO CANTIDAD COSTO
FERT. SIEMBRA 70 Kgs. $315.00 70 Kgs. $315.002a. FERT. 150 Kgs. $675.00 150 Kgs. $675.00 150 Kgs. $675.00FERT. SIEMBRA 85 Kgs. $476.00 85 Kgs. $476.002a. FERT. 25 Kgs $140.00 25 Kgs $140.00 25 Kgs $140.00FERT. SIEMBRA 30 Kgs. $150.00 32 Kgs. $160.002a. FERT. 70 Kgs. $350.00 70 Kgs. $350.00 70 Kgs. $350.00FERT. SIEMBRA 1 Lt. $600.002a. FERT.FERT. SIEMBRA2a. FERT. 15 Kgs. $60.00 15 Kgs. $60.00 15 Kgs. $60.00FERT. SIEMBRA 5 Lts. $250.002a. FERT.FERT. SIEMBRA 5 Lts. $900.002a. FERT.FERT. SIEMBRA 5 Lts. $450.002a. FERT.
COSTO POR Ha. $2,166.00 $2,525.00 $3,076.00
CARBON LIQUIDO $90.00 LITRO
PRECIO
UNITARIOUNIDAD
MICROMIX $4.00 Kg
NATURAL SOIL $50.00
CLORURO DEPOTASIO
$5.00 Kg
MicroSoil® $600.00 LITRO
$4.50 Kg
TESTIGO
LITRO
ROOTING LITRO$180.00
TRATAMIENTO CON
ROOTING
TRATAMIENTO CON
MicroSoil®
MAP $5.60 Kg
PERIODO
UREA
64
RELACION COSTO BENEFICIO
*NOTAS• REPORTE DE PRECIO ASERCA SAGARPA DEL JUEVES 24 DE MAYO DE 2007
DEL SORGO No. 2 EXPORTACION DEL GOLFO $143.30 DLLS. POR TON. , $1,541.54 POR TON.
• COTIZACION DEL DÓLAR PROMEDIO MAXIMO MINIMO DEL BANCO DE MEXICO $ 10.78 DEL MISMO DÍA
PRODUCCION COSTO POR Ha. INGRESO*RELACION COSTO BENEFICIO
TESTIGO 4.800 Tons. $2,166.00 $7,399.39 $5,233.39
TRATAMIENTO CONRooting
4.563 Tons. $3,076.00 $7,034.05 $3,958.05
TRATAMIENTO CONMicroSoil®
5.510 Tons. $2,525.00 $8,493.88 $5,968.88
65
Sin (without) MicroSoil®
Con (with) MicroSoil
CAÑA DE AZUCAR (sugar cane) - Zocatepec de Hidalgo, Mexico in 2013
An increase in production per hectare of 33.22% over previous years harvest
66
FIEZ80330/SC/009/1/13 25 de Enero de 2013 ING. JORGE AGUILAR TALAMANTES
CCEXIMM A. en P.
PRESENTE
Por este conducto hacemos de su conocimiento sobre la petición de la Sra. María de Lourdes
Fernández Olvera, del resultado de la aplicación del Producto MicroSoil de la Compañía que
Usted representa y que se vendió al productor Sr. Quintín Silva Abarca, la información es la
siguiente:
El productor cañero lo probo en su parcela lo cual se localiza en el denominado Tepeolal
perteneciente al ejido de Tlaquiltenango y tiene una superficie de 2.20 hectáreas, ciclo
Planta, variedad CP 72-2086,cuando la caña tenía tres(3) meses de edad, fue aplicada en
dosis de Un (1) Lt./ha. diluidos en 100 Lts. de agua.
El interés de la Sra. Fernández es conocer el rendimiento obtenido correspondiente a la zafra
2012/2013, el cual fue el siguiente: la producción fue 527.56 toneladas y el rendimiento por
hectárea de 239.8 ton/ha. , comparado con el rendimiento de la zafra del año anterior que
fue de 180.0 ton/ha. ; dando así un Aumento en la Producción por Hectárea del 33.22 %;
atribuyéndole principalmente a:
a) El Producto MicroSoil
b) Buen productor
c) Baja condiciones de riego (12 riegos)
d) Manejo adecuado del cultivo
e) Fecha de siembra ( septiembre 2011)
f) Nutrición balanceada (fertilización )
Sin más por el momento quedo de Usted.
67
English Translation January 25, 2013 ING. JORGE AGUILAR TALAMANTES CCEXIMM A. in P. THIS I hereby we inform you about the request of Mrs. Maria de Lourdes Fernandez Olvera, the result of applying the Company Product MicroSoil that You represent and which was sold to senior producer Quentin Silva covers, information is following: The sugarcane producer tasted in its plot which is located in the so-called Tepeolal Tlaquiltenango belonging to the ejido and has an area of 2.20 hectares, cycle plant, variety CP 72-2086, when the cane had three (3) months old, was applied in doses of A (1) Lt. / ha. diluted in 100 Lts. water. The interest of Ms. Fernandez is knowing the yield corresponding to the harvest 2012/2013, which was as follows: the production was 527.56 tons per hectare yield of 239.8 t / ha. Compared to the performance of the previous year's harvest was 180.0 ton / ha. , Giving an increase in production per hectare of 33.22%; attributing mainly to: a) The Product MicroSoil b) Good producer c) Low water conditions (12 irrigations) d) Proper handling of the crop e) Planting date (September 2011) f) Balanced nutrition (fertilization) No more for now I remain. CAREFULLY ING. HECTOR LOPEZ NERIA TECHNICAL FIELD SUPERINTENDENT
68
MARKETS
CITRUS TREES
GREENHOUSES
SUGAR CANE ~ MEXICO TERRACE FARMING
AGRICULTURE FARMS
COMMERCIAL GARDENS
70
HOME GARDEN
HYDROPONICS COMMERCIAL HERB
GREENHOUSE
GREENHOUSE ~ FLOWERS
GOLF COURSES Rice fields ~ China
AGAVE MEXICO
71
Truck Farms
Controlled hydroponics
Commercial agriculture
MicroSoil® Control
Vineyards ~ Mexico
Corn root growth
Mexico
landscaping
72