Preface
The present thesis has been prepared at the Department of Environmental Science and
Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, as part of the fulfilment of the Ph.D.
degree requirements. The work was carried out in the period from March 1997 to Au-
gust 2000, with Associate Professor Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen as supervisor and As-
sociate Professor Hans Mosbæk as co-supervisor. The thesis consists of a summary
focused on pesticide degradability in groundwater, with specific emphasis on the
possible role of the natural redox environment of aquifers, and the following five
papers of which the first four are submitted to international peer-reviewed journals
(not included in www version).
I: Pedersen PG, Albrechtsen H-J (2000a) Spatial variability of redox processes within
and between seven shallow aquifers in Denmark.
II: Pedersen PG, Albrechtsen H-J (2000b) Microbial activity in aerobic and anaerobic
aquifers assessed by the turn-over potential of benzoic acid.
III: Pedersen PG, Mosbæk H, Albrechtsen H-J (2000) Fate of eleven pesticides:
Degradability and sorption in eight Danish aerobic and anaerobic aquifers.
IV: Arildskov NP, Pedersen PG, Albrechtsen H-J (2000) Fate of the herbicides 2,4,5-
T, atrazine, and DNOC in a shallow, anaerobic aquifer investigated by in situ passive
diffusive emitters and laboratory batch experiments. Accepted.
V: Pedersen PG, Albrechtsen H-J (2000c) Slow sorption of atrazine in an anaerobic
low organic carbon aquifer. In preparation.
Since one of the purposes of the summary is to compare the above mentioned papers
with the litterature, all references to the papers are accentuated with bold roman
numerals (I-V).
Many people were involved in this project, and it could not have been fulfilled
without them. Employees at the Department of Chemistry, Royal Veterinary and
Agricultural University, Copenhagen, treated me nice during my visit there. Associate
Professor Christian Bender Koch should be especially mentioned. The people wor-
king at my ”own” department were always professional and ambitious in a pleasant
way, providing a strong daily day basis for the work. A large number of people, both
at the department and other institutions, performed different analysis for me once in a
while. On a more regular basis Carina Aistrup and Mona Refstrup took samples and
generated high quality data for me to work on, and they should be especially thanked.
Torben Dolin and Birte Brejl made beautiful drawings, and Grete Hansen and Helle
Offenberg provided litterature. During field trips, Mads Georg Møller, Haraldur
Hannesson, Bent Skov and Jens Schaarup Sørensen, did the hard work. My co-
supervisor, Hans Mosbæk, often did miracles to a sick, non-functioning HPLC. My
supervisor, Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen, was always prepared to read and thoroughly
comment manuscripts, and to produce new ideas for me to work on.
The last thanks to my family, for being there.
Philip Grinder Pedersen
ii
Abstract
The presence in groundwater of xenobiotic compounds like pesticides causes concern
since groundwater in many countries is used for drinking water purposes and indu-
strial and agricultural use, and since natural ecosystems may be fed by groundwater
containing pesticides. However, investigations on pesticide fate in groundwater are
few in number, especially considering the large number of pesticides used in society
and the large number of pesticides detected in groundwater.
This Ph.D. thesis presents and discusses current knowledge on pesticide degradability
in groundwater. Since many pesticide transformation processes may only be possible
under certain redox conditions, special emphasis is given to the possible influencing
role of the natural aquifer redox conditions. Sources of pesticide pollution and
ecotoxicological and health aspects of groundwater contamination with pesticides are
not dealt with.
The experimental part of the Ph.D. project focused on two interlinked topics. One was
to characterize the natural redox conditions and other conditions of a number of
different pristine aquifers, mainly anaerobic. The other was to investigate the degrada-
bility behaviour of a number of pesticides in samples from the different aquifers, and
eventually to couple the behaviour to the aquifer redox conditions or other charac-
teristics.
Point source contaminations – e.g. with chlorinated solvents, oil or landfill leachate –
may alter the natural redox conditions of an aquifer towards a more reduced environ-
ment, whereas pesticide pollutions typically are low load pulse pollutions, which
probably does not alter the natural redox conditions, except in extreme cases.
Therefore the ”natural” redox environment of aquifers is relevant to consider when
assessing the fate of pesticides in groundwater.
iii
Natural aquifer redox conditions were shown to vary substantially between and within
the investigated aquifers. Aerobic conditions were not always present and redox
conditions varied within a few meters of vertical distance in some aquifers. The redox
environment of aquifers is a function of several factors, including geological origin of
the aquifer settings, flow patterns, and organic load. Without detailed investigations it
may be difficult to assess the natural redox environment of a pesticide polluted
aquifer.
The coupling between pesticide degradability and anaerobic conditions has been
studied in a few investigations only, typically with a single pesticide and a specific
aquifer redox environment. In the experimental part of this project, using a range of
pesticides and a range of aquifers and aquifer redox environments made it possible to
both expand the number of pesticide investigations in anaerobic aquifers and to
compare pesticide behaviour between aquifers. Since the experimental setup was
similar in all the performed experiments, the found differences in pesticide behaviour
were not due to setup differences but could be ascribed differences in aquifer charac-
teristics.
Pesticides are a chemically very diverse group of compounds, and the degradability is
equally diverse. Some pesticides – like the phenoxy alcanoic acid (e.g. MCPP) or s-
triazine (atrazine) pesticides – have been subject to a relatively large number of
groundwater investigations, including the ones performed in this project. General
trends can be extracted from the investigations but ”conflicting” behaviour is often
observed. Several investigations documented phenoxy alcanoic acid degradation in
groundwater under mainly aerobic conditions, but a few showed persistence under
both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Atrazine was persistent under both aerobic and
anaerobic conditions in some investigations, whereas others showed that atrazine was
degradable or at least removed from the groundwater phase under anaerobic condi-
tions. Clearly, the mechanisms controlling both atrazine and phenoxy alcanoic acid
degradability in groundwater are not completely understood, and may be a function of
aquifer specific factors as well as type of pesticide.
Other pesticides – e.g. the acetanilide (e.g. alachlor) or phenylurea (e.g. isoproturon)
pesticides – probably will show the same complex behaviour if more investigations
iv
are made. None the less, additional investigations of the behaviour of these pesticides
are needed to better understand the fate of these pesticides in groundwater.
It may be operationally and regulatory sound to neglect the importance of ground-
water degradability when evaluating the fate of pesticides in the environment. From a
precautionary principle viewpoint this is a responsible approach, especially since the
experiments performed in this project and other investigations showed that some
pesticides, e.g. bentazone and the dichlobenil metabolite BAM (2,6-dichloroben-
zamide) seemed to be persistent or very slowly degradable in groundwater, regardless
redox or other conditions. The variable degradation behaviour between aquifers of the
degradable pesticides also shows that general assessments of pesticide degradability
and degradation rates should be avoided. Use of pesticides should not be allowed
based on assumed groundwater degradability only.
On the other hand, degradation of pesticides in groundwater might in certain cases be
the last possible way of minimizing a pollution problem, making a continued effort to
understand the degradation processes in aquifers relevant. It is especially important to
document whether the degradability observed in controlled and to a certain extent
“artificial” degradation experiments with high and constant pesticide concentrations
can be transferred to “real world” behaviour. However, since many factors influence
the presence of pesticides in groundwater, it may be difficult in “real world” systems
to determine the importance of aquifer degradability in comparison to e.g. top soil
attenuation processes.
In order to better understand the role of the aquifer two approaches can be proposed.
One approach is to exploit the presence of pesticide metabolites in groundwater in
comparison to parent compound (e.g. using metabolite/parent compound ratios). Low
ratios would show that only minimal degradation had occurred, both in top soil and
groundwater. High ratios would in itself only show that the parent compound had
been subject to degradation, either in the aquifer or prior to being transported to the
aquifer. However, combined with e.g. groundwater age determinations it might be
possible to indicate degradation in groundwater.
v
Another approach is to integrate groundwater characteristics in “real world”
investigations on pesticide detections. Groundwater characteristics would include
redox conditions (e.g. presence and concentration of redox relevant compounds, like
oxygen or iron) or information on previous exposure to pesticides. Exploiting such
knowledge in e.g. statistical analysis on groundwater detections might in some cases
lead to detection of degradability “trends”, e.g. lack of detecting certain pesticides
under specific redox conditions. Such trends, indicative of groundwater degradation
or non-degradation under specific groundwater conditions, could subsequently be
investigated and eventually verified in more controlled investigations.
vi
Resumé
Fund af pesticider og andre miljøfremmede stoffer i grundvand giver anledning til
bekymring, både fordi grundvand i mange lande benyttes som drikkevand, industrielt
og i landbrug, og fordi naturlige økosystemer i hydrologisk kontakt med grundvand
(fx vandløb og søer) kan blive påvirket af pesticidforurenet grundvand. Der er dog
kun lavet relativt få undersøgelser af pesticiders skæbne i grundvand, især taget i
betragtning det store antal pesticider, der bruges i samfundet og findes i grundvandet.
Denne ph.d.-afhandling præsenterer og diskuterer den nuværende viden om pesticid-
nedbrydelighed i grundvand. Mange nedbrydningsprocesser er kun mulige under
bestemte redoxforhold, og derfor er der lagt særlig vægt på det naturlige redoxmiljø i
grundvand. Kilder til forurening med pesticider og helbreds- og økotoxikologiske
aspekter er ikke behandlet.
Den eksperimentelle del af ph.d.-projektet fokuserede på to koblede emner. Det ene
var karakterisering af de naturlige redoxforhold og andre forhold i et antal forskellige
uforurenede og primært anaerobe grundvandsmagasiner. Det andet var at undersøge
nedbrydeligheden af et antal pesticider i prøver fra de forskellige magasiner, og om
muligt at koble nedbrydeligheden til magasinets redoxmiljø eller andre forhold.
Punktkildeforureninger – fx med chlorerede opløsningsmidler, olie eller losseplads-
perkolat – kan ændre det naturlige redoxmiljø mod mere reducerede forhold, mens
forureninger med pesticider typisk består af små mængder pesticid i pulse, som –
undtagen i særlige tilfælde – sandsynligvis ikke vil ændre det naturlige redoxmiljø.
Derfor er det naturlige redoxmiljø i grundvand vigtigt at tage med i betragtning, når
pesticiders skæbne i grundvand skal vurderes.
Det blev påvist at redoxforholdene i de undersøgte grundvandsmagasiner varierede,
både indenfor det enkelte grundvandsmagasin og mellem magasinerne. Således var
der ikke aerobe forhold i alle magasiner, og i nogle magasiner skiftede redoxmiljøet
vii
vertikalt indenfor få meter. Redoxforholdene styres af mange faktorer, bla grund-
vandsmagasinets geologiske dannelsesmiljø, strømningsforholdene og mængden af
organisk stof. Uden detaljerede undersøgelser kan det være vanskeligt at vurdere
redoxforholdene i et pesticidforurenet grundvandsmagasin.
Der er kun lavet få undersøgelser af sammenhængen mellem nedbrydelighed af
pesticider og anaerobe grundvandsforhold, og typisk kun med et fåtal af pesticider i et
specifikt redoxmiljø. I den eksperimentelle del af dette projekt blev mange forskellige
pesticider og mange forskellige grundvandsmagasiner med forskellige redoxmiljøer
undersøgt, hvilket både forøgede det totale antal grundvandsundersøgelser af
pesticider i forskellige anaerobe miljøer, og muliggjorde en sammenligning mellem
forskellige grundvandsforhold. De fundne forskelle i nedbrydelighed mellem prøver
fra forskellige grundvandsmagasiner skyldtes ikke forskelle i eksperimentelt setup,
idet disse var ens i alle eksperimenter, men kunne tillægges forhold relateret til grund-
vandsmagasinerne.
Pesticider er kemisk set meget forskellige, og der er ligeledes forskellig nedbrydelig-
hed af de forskellige pesticider. Visse pesticider – såsom phenoxysyrerne (fx MCPP)
eller s-triazinerne (fx atrazin) – har været genstand for et forholdsvist stort antal
undersøgelser, inklusive de eksperimentelle forsøg i dette projekt. Der kan uddrages
generelle tendenser af disse undersøgelser, men også “modstridende” opførsel. Aerob
nedbrydning af phenoxysyrer er dokumenteret i mange undersøgelser, mens nogle få
har vist manglende nedbrydning under både aerobe og anaerobe forhold. På samme
måde har et antal undersøgelser vist manglende nedbrydning af atrazin i grundvand,
både aerobt og anaerobt, mens andre har vist nedbrydning eller fjernelse fra
grundvandet. Der er således ikke en samlet forståelse af mekanismerne bag
nedbrydeligheden af atrazin eller phenoxysyrer i grundvand, men faktorer relateret til
det specifikke grundvandsmagasin har efter alt at dømme betydning, parallelt med de
stofspecifikke faktorer.
Andre typer pesticider – fx acetanilider (fx alachlor) eller phenylurea-pesticider (fx
isoproturon) – vil sandsynligvis opføre sig tilsvarende komplekst i nye undersøgelser
af grundvandsnedbrydeligheden. Dette viser nødvendigheden af sådanne under-
søgelser for at forbedre forståelsen af også disse pesticiders skæbne i grundvand.
viii
Det er operationelt og regulatorisk fornuftigt at se bort fra betydningen af grundvands-
nedbrydeligheden, når pesticiders skæbne i miljøet skal vurderes. Dette vil være
ansvarligt ud fra en forsigtighedsprincip-synsvinkel, idet resultaterne fra dette projekts
eksperimentelle del og andre undersøgelser har vist at visse pesticider – fx bentazon
og dichlobenilnedbrydningsproduktet BAM (2,6-dichlorbenzamid) – ser ud til at være
ikke-nedbrydelige eller kun meget langsomt nedbrydelige i grundvand, uanset redox-
forhold eller andre forhold. For de pesticider, som kan nedbrydes i grundvand, gør
forskelle mellem grundvandsmagasiner det også vanskeligt at give generelle
vurderinger af nedbrydeligheden. Brug af pesticider bør derfor ikke tillades på
baggrund af nedbrydelighed i grundvand alene.
Omvendt kan nedbrydning af pesticider i grundvandet være den sidste mulighed for at
minimere et forureningsproblem. I sådanne tilfælde er øget viden om nedbrydelighed i
grundvandsmagasiner derfor relevant. Det er særlig vigtigt at få dokumenteret,
hvorvidt den nedbrydelighed, der kan observeres i kontrollerede og til en vis grad
“kunstige” nedbrydningseksperimenter med høje og konstante pesticidkoncentra-
tioner, kan overføres til nedbrydelighed i virkelige grundvandsmagasiner. Denne do-
kumentation kan være vanskelig at få, fordi mange faktorer påvirker tilstedeværelsen
af pesticider i grundvandet. Betydningen af grundvandsmagasinets rolle i forhold til
fx nedbrydningen i overjorden kan være vanskelig at bestemme.
To tilgange kan foreslås for bedre at forstå grundvandsmagasinets rolle. Den ene er at
udnytte tilstedeværelsen af nedbrydningsprodukter i forhold til moderstof (fx ved at
beregne forholdet mellem koncentrationen af nedbrydningsprodukt og moderstof). Et
lavt forhold viser at der kun er sket minimal nedbrydning, både i overjord og
grundvand. Omvendt viser et højt forhold i sig selv kun, at der er sket nedbrydning,
enten i grundvandet eller under transporten til grundvandet, men kombineret med fx
målinger af grundvandets alder, vil det måske vise sig muligt at sandsynliggøre
nedbrydning i grundvandet.
En anden tilgang er at integrere den øvrige viden om det grundvand, hvori der
detekteres pesticider. Denne viden omfatter redoxforhold (fx i form af tilstedeværelse
og koncentration af redoxparametre som ilt eller opløst jern) og information om
tidligere eksponering til pesticider. Hvis sådan viden udnyttes, fx i statistiske analyser
ix
af grundvandsfund af pesticider, kunne det måske i nogle tilfælde føre til fund af
“nedbrydningssammenhænge”. Et eksempel på en sådan sammenhæng kunne være
manglende fund af bestemte pesticider under bestemte redoxforhold, indikerende at
en nedbrydning var sket. En sådan sammenhæng kunne efterfølgende undersøges og
måske verificeres under mere kontrollerede forhold.
x
Table of contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Pesticide degradation in top soil 2
1.2 Thesis delimitations 5
2 Factors affecting pesticide degradability in groundwater 7
2.1 Redox conditions 7
2.2 Microbial activity 14
2.3 Concluding remarks 17
3 Pesticide transformation processes 18
3.1 Types of transformation processes 18
3.2 Dechlorination 20
3.3 Abiotic versus biological transformation 21
3.4 Adaptation 22
3.5 Concluding remarks 25
4 Fate of selected pesticides in groundwater 26
4.1 S-Triazines 26
4.2 Phenoxy alkanoic acids 37
4.3 Nitroaromatic pesticides 40
4.4 Acetanilide pesticides 43
4.5 Phenylurea pesticides 45
4.6 Benzothiadiazone pesticides 46
4.7 Nitrile pesticides 48
4.8 Concluding remarks 49
5 Discussion and Perspectives 50
5.1 Effect of the groundwater redox environment 50
5.2 Degradability in ”real world” systems 51
5.3 Interpreting ”real world” data 51
6 References 55
xi
1 Introduction
Presence of pesticides in groundwater has been reported from all over the world,
including Europe (EEA, 1999) and the US (Barbash et al., 1999). Pesticide
contamination of groundwater gives rise to concern, since groundwater is used for
agricultural and industrial purposes and as a substantial part of the drinking water
supply in several countries. From an ecological point of view, it may be an even larger
problem, since plant and animal life in ecosystems in hydrological contact with
groundwater (like meadows, streams, swamps etc.) may be affected by pesticides in
the groundwater.
Typically only low pesticide concentrations (up to a few µg L-1) have been detected in
groundwater and the findings are often limited to more shallow secondary ground-
water. The low concentration findings may indicate that attenuation processes – most
notably degradation – in the top soil are able to minimize the pollution problem (see
below), but the findings could also be the first signs of a pesticide front, inevitably
moving towards the groundwater reservoirs. Multiple processes and factors affect the
fate of pesticides. Some factors are related to the specific pesticide, some factors are
related to the specific top soil environment to which the pesticide is applied and the
transport time through the top soil and vadose zone, and some factors are related to
the aquifer which eventually ends up being contaminated with the pesticide.
To what extent the aquifer plays a role in determining pesticide degradability is the
main topic of this thesis. It is an underlying assumption that the natural redox environ-
ment is an important factor in most groundwater processes, both biological and abiotic
processes. Since transformation of organic compounds – like pesticides - often in-
clude reduction or oxidation processes, the assumption seems reasonable, and there-
fore the approach in the following is to compare pesticide degradability with the redox
environment in which the pesticide is present. At the same time it is acknowledged
that other groundwater related factors, e.g. the groundwater pH, the presence of diffe-
rent organic and inorganic species in the aquifer and the presence and activity of
1
“competent biomass” may very well be paramount to redox in controlling pesticide
fate in aquifers.
1.1 Pesticide degradation in top soil
Several factors influence if pesticides end up in groundwater, including the amount
and type of pesticide applied in a given area, weather conditions, the hydro- and
geochemical characteristics of the soil and degradability and sorption characteristics
of the specific pesticide. Moreover, the factors may influence each other. Heavy rain
in connection to a recent application may give rise to transport of a large pesticide
amount through the top soil. Sorption as well as degradability is a function, not only
of the specific pesticide, but also of the geochemical and microbial characteristics of
the top soil.
Barbash et al. (1999) showed a good relation between the agricultural use and the
frequency of detection in shallow groundwater for five pesticides in the US (Fig. 1)
and in addition showed that the frequency of detection was lower for pesticides with
lower aerobic soil half-lives (t½).
2
(figure not available: Refer to original reference)
Fig 1. Frequencies for five pesticide detections in shallow groundwater for the 39 NAWQA
(National Water-Quality Assessment) studies in relation to agricultural use within a 1-
kilometer radius surrounding all sites samples for each study. Numbers in brackets are
networks with no pesticide detections and zero estimated agricultural use (assigned an
agricultural use value of 0.001 kg (km2)-1). a.i., active ingredient; R2, coefficient of
determination for simple linear correlations; ρ, Spearman rank correlation coefficient; t½, half
life for herbicide transformation in aerobic soil; *, correlation significant at the P<0.05 level;
**, correlation significant at the P<0.001 level; usnkluscr, study area code, Upper Snake
River Basin study area. From Barbash et al., 1999.
3
Atrazine, with an aerobic soil half-life of 146 days, was detected in more than 80% of
samples from areas with agricultural use of more than 10 kg a.i. (active ingredient)
per square kilometer, whereas cyanazine, with an aerobic half-life of 17 days, was
detected in less than 20% of samples from areas with the same use of cyanazine.
Sorption was not found to be significantly correlated to the frequency of findings of
the five pesticides (Barbash et al., 1999), probably due to a narrow range of KOC-
values, but for a larger group of pesticides with a broader range of KOC-values Kolpin
et al. (1998a) found a significant, inverse, relation between KOC and the frequency of
detections in shallow groundwater.
The presence of degradation products in groundwater also shows the importance of
degradation in top soil. Kolpin et al. (1998b) compared for five pesticides the ratio of
total product detection frequency (parent compound plus degradation products) to
parent compound detection frequency, with the top soil dissipation half-life, and
found that the faster the dissipation the higher the ratio of total product to parent
product (Fig. 2).
(figure not available: Refer to original reference)
Fig. 2. The relation between soil dissipation half-life of the parent compound and the ratio of
the total product to parent detection frequencies (TPPR). From Kolpin et al., 1998b.
4
Adams and Thurman (1991) proposed that the ratio of the groundwater content of the
atrazine metabolite deethylatrazine and atrazine could be used to assess the top soil
residence time of atrazine. The proposal was based on considerations that a high
deethylatrazine to atrazine ratio (DAR) was due to long residence time in the top soil
and thereby to an increased transformation of atrazine to deethylatrazine by soil
microorganisms, in contrast to a low DAR in situations where the residence time was
low. The DAR has been used succesfully to describe water transport to the
Mississippi river, showing that the DAR increased in base flow situations, but
decreased in surface run-off situations, where the contact time between atrazine and
the top soil were shorter (Meyer et al., 1996). Recently, the approach of using ratios
of pesticides and metabolites for evaluating infiltration rates was proposed for another
pesticide, the acetanilide pesticide metolachlor (Phillips et al., 1999).
1.2 Thesis delimitations
The presence of pesticides in groundwater can be viewed as a health problem, as an
ecotoxicological problem and as a regulatory problem. The EEC threshold limit for
pesticides in drinking water is 0.1 µg L-1 (EEC, 1980). This limit is also used for
groundwater for regulatory purposes, but is not chosen from a toxicological view-
point. In other parts of the world, higher threshold limits for pesticides in groundwater
exist. Toxicological and ecotoxicological impacts of pesticides in groundwater are not
presented or discussed in this thesis.
The sources of pesticide pollution of groundwater are still a matter of dispute. It is not
known if correct agricultural practice use of pesticides or pesticide spills and
accidents are the main reason for the pollution. Probably both contribute. In the
context of this thesis, pesticide pollutions will be viewed as infrequent non-point
source pollutions of low concentrations. Thereby pesticide pollutions are different
from point source pollutions in several ways. The sources are unspecified, the load to
the aquifer over time is not constant and may occur in irregular pulses, determined by
pesticide application and weather events, and the concentrations are in most situations
5
probably too low to alter the natural conditions of the aquifers (including redox
conditions).
Other xenobiotic pollutions may be characterized in the same way. Small amounts of
waste water may leak from old sewers to the groundwater, containing complex and
chemically diverse compounds like detergents and medicine residues. Such com-
pounds may be subject to the same aquifer processes that are described in the
following chapters.
6
2 Factors affecting pesticide degradability in groundwater
The factors affecting pesticide transformation processes in groundwater are, to a great
extent, the same which are responsible for transformation processes in top soil or
other environments. The main differences lie in the special characteristics of
groundwater that may differ from other environments.
Many groundwater factors affect transformation processes, amongst these are redox
conditions, presence of microbial life and activity, temperature and pH. Higher tempe-
ratures may increase abiotic transformation process rates, whereas temperature optima
exists for biological processes. Many hydrolysis reactions may be enhanced by high
and low pH values (e.g. fast abiotic atrazine hydrolysis to hydroxyatrazine). pH may
affect both sorption behaviour and microbial availability of some pesticides, e.g.
acidic pesticides such as the phenoxy alkanoic acids, since the chemical distribution
between neutral and anionic forms is pH controlled. Groundwater redox conditions
and microbial activity will be discussed in the following sections.
2.1 Redox conditions
The term ”redox conditions” refers to the microbial terminal electron accepting pro-
cesses taking place within the aquifer. If oxygen is present aerobic conditions will
dominate and microbial metabolism takes place with oxygen as the terminal electron
acceptor. If oxygen is depleted other electron acceptors will be used and anaerobic
terminal electron accepting processes (TEAPs) occur (e.g. Stumm and Morgan, 1996).
Nitrate, oxides and hydroxides of manganese(IV) and iron(III), sulfate and carbon
dioxide can be used as electron acceptors in order to gain energy for microbial main-
tenance and growth.
Discrete groundwater chemistry zones, indicative of different redox environments, are
often found along flow lines in aquifers, going from more oxidized to more reduced
7
conditions (e.g. Lovley and Chapelle, 1995; Appelo and Postma, 1993). Figure 3
shows a conceptual example, where the groundwater composition changes from
oxidized to reduced conditions over depth, assuming a downward vertical flow
gradient.
(figure not available: Refer to original reference)
Fig. 3. The sequence of reduction processes as reflected by groundwater composition.
Adapted from Appelo and Postma, 1993, p 258.
The zonation can be explained by energy yield considerations. Microorganisms
capable of using the more oxidized electron acceptors will have an advantage over
other microorganisms, because they gain more energy from the TEAP. Therefore the
most energy yielding electron acceptor will be depleted prior to the use of the next
best electron acceptor. In practice, this microbial competition can take place via
physiological controls like competitive exclusion processes. For example, iron
reducing bacteria are able to maintain the concentration of hydrogen and low
molecular acids at concentrations too low for sulfate reducing or methane producing
bacteria to exploit (Chapelle and Lovley, 1992). In these considerations it is assumed
that the bacteria responsible for the anaerobic TEAPs are only able to metabolize
8
simple organic compounds which are produced from more complicated structures by
fermentating bacteria (Lovley and Chapelle, 1995; Chapelle, 1993).
Abiotic processes may help in creating seemingly discrete redox zones. Manganese
oxides may be reduced by Fe2+ produced by iron reduction, leading to removal of dis-
solved Fe2+ and abiotic production of dissolved Mn2+, which indicate a solely
manganese reducing environment. In addition, Fe2+ may be precipitated by sulfides if
sulfate reduction also occurs, and methane produced in a methanogenic environment
may be used by sulfate reducing bacteria. In such cases water chemistry may indicate
that only sulfate reduction is occurring.
It has been proposed (Postma and Jakobsen, 1996) that a partial equilibrium model
gives a better and more precise explanation for redox zonation. Often the initial fer-
mentation is the rate limiting step, and by considering the TEAP to be fast and in ther-
modynamical equilibrium it is possible to predict which TEAPs are possible under
which conditions, using a number of assumptions. Using the partial equilibrium
approach, interactions between iron and sulfate reduction processes in a number of
aquifers were explained (Postma and Jakobsen, 1996; Jakobsen and Postma, 1999).
Using changes in pH, sulfate concentrations and stability of the iron oxides in the
aquifers it was possible to explain why, in certain environments, sulfate reduction
dominated over iron reduction, even though iron oxides were still present. Overlaps
between iron and sulfate reduction zones are often found (e.g. Jakobsen and Postma,
1999; Ludvigsen et al., 1998; Pedersen and Albrechtsen, 2000, I), and may be ex-
plained by the partial equilibrium model.
A large number of investigations have focused on redox environments in connection
with point source contaminations. A recent review is Christensen et al. (2000). In
such situations a high amount of organic matter, either in mixtures of a relatively few
compounds – e.g. contaminations with chlorinated solvents or refined mixtures of
hydrocarbons like gasoline – or in more complex mixtures – e.g. landfill leachates or
contaminations with crude oil – is introduced to the groundwater. This changes the
natural redox environment in a more reduced direction and redox zonation is often
seen. Closest to the contaminant source methane producing conditions are found, and
further downgradient sulfate reduction, iron and manganese reduction, denitrification
9
and aerobic conditions can be found, provided that the individual electron acceptors
are present naturally in the aquifer.
The number of investigations concerning the redox environment of pristine, uncon-
taminated aquifers are more sparse and often focus on the processes involved in
specific redox processes. For example, Pedersen et al. (1991), Postma et al. (1991),
Francis et al. (1989) and Trudell et al. (1986) focused on denitrification both in
pristine aquifers and aquifers contaminated by nitrate from agricultural use, and
Lovley et al. (1990) focused on iron reduction processes in deeply buried pristine
aquifers. The interactions between different redox processes have also been described,
e.g. interactions and competitions between iron and sulfate reduction in several
pristine aquifers (Brown et al., 1999; Jakobsen and Postma, 1999; Postma and Jakob-
sen, 1996; Chapelle and Lovley, 1992). Pedersen and Albrechtsen (2000, I) investi-
gated seven pristine and shallow Danish aquifers, and found highly varying redox
conditions, both between aquifers and within the individual aquifers. Figure 4 shows
water redox chemistry profiles from the seven aquifers, which together with sediment
chemistry analysis and TEAP bioassays provided evidence for all anaerobic TEAPs
(denitrification, manganese reduction, iron reduction, sulfate reduction, methane
production) occurring in one or more of the investigated aquifers, sometimes
simultanously.
10
Fig. 4. Redox chemistry profiles from seven pristine Danish aquifers. Dotted lines indicate
water table (mbs: meters below soil surface). Grey boxes indicate low permeable silt/clay
layers. From Pedersen and Albrechtsen, 2000a, I.
11
Several factors influence the kind of redox environment found in a given aquifer. Old
groundwater is more influenced by aquifer processes and tends to be more reduced
than young groundwater, since oxygen and nitrate may more likely be depleted. The
age is controlled by hydrogeological characteristics of the aquifer, e.g. the hydraulic
conductivities, presence of low or high permeable aquifer material layers and the
distance to water divides, which together with the initial water input to the aquifer
(e.g. from rain or river infiltration) influence flow patterns, and thereby the ground-
water age.
The organic load of the aquifers – either sediment bound or present in the water –
serve as an electron donor in the redox processes. All other factors being equal, this
would lead to more reduced environments in aquifers containing high amounts of
organic matter. In two aerobic aquifers and a denitrifying and manganese and iron
reducing aquifer TOC (total organic carbon) was generally in the range of 50 – 200
µgC (g dw - dry weight)-1 and NVOC (non-volatile organic carbon) was in the range
of 1 to 5 mgC L-1 (Fig. 5). In more strongly reduced aquifers (iron and sulfate
reducing) TOC was in the range of 200 to 2600 µgC (g dw)-1 and NVOC ranged from
2 to 63 mgC L-1. These ranges corresponded well with ranges found for other
anaerobic shallow and pristine aquifers. Arildskov et al. (2000, IV) found DOC
(dissolved organic carbon) values of 8-10 mgC L-1 in a shallow iron and sulfate
reducing and methane producing aquifer, and Jakobsen and Postma (1999) found
DOC values in the range of 0.5 to 4 mM, corresponding to 6 to 48 mgC L-1, under
similar redox conditions.
12
Fig. 5. Comparison between redox environments from seven pristine aquifers and NVOC
(top) and TOC (bottom). Samples harbouring more than one redox process, have been
ascribed an “average” redox environment for simplicity. From Pedersen and Albrechtsen,
2000a, I.
Both TOC and NVOC/DOC are crude measures of what might be available for
metabolic activity. Perhaps only a few percent of the naturally occurring carbon is
bioavailable (van der Kooij et al., 1982). None the less, it could be speculated that the
total organic content in general would give a first impression of the redox
environment, at least for shallow aquifers with relatively simple flow patterns.
13
2.2 Microbial activity
Microbial activity is a relevant measure when assessing the potential for biological
transformation processes. Microbial activity in groundwater can be highly variable,
even under the same redox conditions, and is influenced by several factors, including
the nutrient supply, pH and temperature.
Several methological approaches can be applied when studying microbial activity, and
they have different advantages and limitations. A recent review of the different
approaches, together with their potentials and limitations, can be found in Kieft and
Phelps (1997). The specific approach is important to take into acount when assessing
the specific results, and will therefore be adressed briefly in the following.
Enumeration of total number of microorganisms, of viable microorganisms or of
cellular compounds directly involved with metabolic activity (e.g. ATP) is often used
to indicate presence of microbes, and have been of great value in studies showing the
general presence of bacteria in aquifer environments (e.g. Boone et al., 1995).
Characterization of microbial populations e.g. in terms of physiological or
phylogenetic analysis may show the diversity amongst microorganisms (e.g. Balkwill
and Boone, 1997). However, in terms of microbial activity and significance, the mere
number or identity of the microorganisms says little, even when measuring metabolic
activity parameters.
Measuring changes in the concentration of relevant compounds over time is another
approach to assess microbial activity, because activity rate estimates and constraints
can be assessed. The compounds in question can include redox process species (e.g.
oxygen or Fe2+) or organic compounds. Transformation of specific xenobiotics or
more general model compounds can be followed over time, both in laboratory or field
incubation experiments, using more or less advanced approaches (Kieft and Phelps,
1997; Christensen et al., 2000). Changes in the ”real world” concentration of geo-
chemical parameters or of contaminants over time or distance may provide knowledge
of average metabolism rates, or provide constraints on the minimum or maximum
possible rates (Chapelle et al., 1995; Phelps et al., 1994; Chapelle and Lovley, 1992;
14
Chapelle and Lovley, 1990). For example the presence of oxygen at high depths in an
aquifer may be used to calculate a maximum rate of aerobic metabolism (Kieft and
Phelps, 1997) and the presence of a xenobiotic compound in ”old” groundwater may
indicate recalcitrance of the compound (e.g. Eades, 1992).
TEAP-bioassays are useful to explore whether anaerobic electron accepting processes
occur, because several of the water soluble and sediment bound chemical redox
indicators (e.g. nitrate, Fe2+, Mn2+, sulfide, FeS2, methan) are influenced by other
processes, like variation in input, transport from other parts of the aquifer, or
precipitation. For example, dissolved Fe2+ may indicate iron reduction, but is stable
under reduced and non-sulfidogenic conditions and therefore may be found under
non-iron reducing conditions. In fact, Pedersen and Albrechtsen (2000, I) observed
active iron reduction in fewer aquifers by using TEAP-bioassay than was expected
from the presence of reduced iron in the groundwater. TEAP-bioassays can be used to
assess occurrence and rates of TEAPs, and to detect both dominant TEAPs and less
dominant TEAPs occurring simultanously in both pristine and contaminated aquifers
(Pedersen and Albrechtsen, 2000, I; Cozzarelli et al., 1999; Ludvigsen et al., 1998).
TEAP-bioassays can also be used to evaluate limiting factors for TEAPs (e.g.
presence of electron donors or acceptors) (e.g. Albrechtsen et al., 1995). TEAP-
bioassays are discussed in more detail in Christensen et al. (2000).
When the potential for degradation of xenobiotic compounds (like pesticides) is in
question, a common approach is to incubate groundwater material samples with the
xenobiotic compound and follow the eventual concentration decrease over time. This
can be done both in laboratory incubations and field injection experiments. 14C-
labelled compounds give the additional possibility of also monitoring eventual
mineralization in terms of 14CO2 production. A number of investigations using both
non-labelled and labelled pesticides for transformation studies will be described in the
following chapters.
The general microbial activity, in terms of e.g. the turn-over potential rates of
generally occurring organic matter in groundwater can be assessed using model
compounds, e.g. readily degradable compounds like glucose and acetate (e.g. Kieft et
al., 1995; Phelps et al., 1994; Chapelle and Lovley, 1990; Phelps et al., 1989) or more
15
recalcitrant compounds like phenol or aniline (e.g. Swindoll et al., 1988a, b).
Pedersen and Albrechtsen (2000, II) used ring-labelled 14C-benzoic acid (benzoate)
for this purpose, because benzoic acid is an intermediate in the transformation of both
naturally occurring compounds like lignin (Young and Fraser, 1987) and several
xenobiotics (Alvarez and Vogel, 1995; Lovley and Lonergan, 1990; Kuhn et al.,
1988). It was verified that microbial activity was in fact present in the pristine aquifers
investigated, in terms of turn-over of benzoic acid. More important, the substantially
slower benzoic acid turn-over in the most reduced aquifers correlated just as well to
the generally higher contents of natural organic matter in these aquifers than to redox
conditions (Figs. 6, 7), and presence of lag phases, even at an inititial concentration of
1 µgC L-1, showed adaptation. It was therefore speculated that higher organic matter
availability in the anaerobic aquifers slowed down the adaptation to benzoic acid, and
therefore, that the turn-over rates could not be used to quantify microbial activity.
Fig. 6. 50% degradation time (DT50) of 14C-benzoic acid as a function of redox environment
for seven pristine Danish aquifers. Samples with more than one redox process have been
ascribed “average” redox status for simplicity. From Pedersen and Albrechtsen, 2000b, II.
16
Fig. 7. 50% degradation time (DT50) of 14C-benzoic acid as a function of NVOC (mgC L-1)
for seven pristine Danish aquifers. From Pedersen and Albrechtsen, 2000b, II.
2.3 Concluding remarks
Multible methods exist for evaluating both redox conditions and microbial life and
activity of aquifers. The different investigation methods have advantages and
limitations, and the results are often influenced by the methods used. It may therefore
generally be necessary to use a span of methods to supplement each other.
The number of investigated aquifers are slowly increasing, revealing an increasingly
complex picture of the subsurface. This complexity must be taken into account when
fate of xenobiotics in groundwater is to be considered. An example of this is that even
though a certain pesticide is degradable under certain conditions in one aquifer (like
specific redox conditions), degradation in other aquifers under the same conditions
does not neccessarily take place.
17
3 Pesticide transformation processes
3.1 Types of transformation processes
It is convenient to roughly differentiate between oxidative, reductive and hydrolytic
transformation processes. Other processes (e.g. isomerization, molecular rearrange-
ments) as well as conjugation processes and formation of bound residues may also
contribute to pesticide transformation. For a more detailed description of the different
types of transformation processes, see Scheunert (1992).
Examples of oxidative processes are decarboxylation of the phenoxy alkanoic acids,
e.g. 2,4-D, to the corresponding phenols (Evans et al., 1971; Don et al., 1985), or N-
demethylation of phenylurea pesticides, e.g. isoproturon (Mudd et al., 1983). Reduc-
tive processes cover reduction of nitro substituents or complete elimination of the
nitro groups, e.g. in pentachloronitrobenzene (Scheunert, 1992; Macalady et al.,
1986). Hydrolytic processes include carbolylic and sulphate ester hydrolysis, and
nitrile hydrolysis, e.g. of dichlobenil to the corresponding amide (Verloop, 1972).
Transformation may be influenced by the redox conditions. 2,4,5-T was dechlorinated
under methane producing conditions in samples from the leachate contaminated
aquifer of the Norman landfill, Oklahoma (Gibson and Suflita, 1990) while sulfate
inhibited dechlorination, presumably by changing the redox environment to a sulfate
reducing environment. Several investigations (Smelt et al., 1995; Kazumi and
Capone, 1995; Ou et al., 1988) report oxidation of aldicarb under aerobic conditions
to aldicarb sulfoxide and subsequently to aldicarb sulfone (Fig. 8). Under anaerobic
conditions hydrolytic transformation of both aldicarb and the oxidized metabolites
produces the less toxic oxime and nitrile metabolites (Kazumi and Capone, 1995).
18
Fig. 8. Chemical structure of aldicarb and aldicarb metabolites under aerobic and anaerobic
conditions.
Some pesticides are transformed by conjugation processes, where a chemical reaction
with naturally occurring organic compounds produces typically larger molecules.
Acetanilide pesticides, e.g. alachlor, are subject to glutathione conjugation in higher
organisms like plants and insects. The process results in the formation of
ethanesulfonic and oxalinic acids (Field and Thurman, 1996). Acetanilide ethane-
sulfonic acids, like alachlor ESA, are often found in groundwater in the US (Kalkhoff
et al., 1998).
Bound residue formation of pesticides are reported for top soil environments and can
be defined, rather arbitrarily, as pesticide residues not extractable from soil using
solvents (Scheunert, 1992; Khan, 1982). Mechanisms leading to the formation of
bound residues include physical deposition into clay minerals or in cavities between
19
naturally occurring organic compounds, or chemical binding to organic compounds.
Formation of bound residues can occur fast. For example, one day after atrazine
application to top soil lysimeters, 22% was non-extractable (Barriuso and Koskinen,
1996). In groundwater the importance of bound residue formation is unknown. It
could be speculated that the low content of organic matter generally found in aquifers
would limit the role of bound residue formation. However, slow atrazine removal over
time in laboratory incubations with groundwater and sediment from a number of
Danish aquifer could be explained by formation of a non-extractable fraction of the
applied atrazine (Pedersen and Albrechtsen, 2000, V – see next chapter).
3.2 Dechlorination
Pesticides are chemically very diverse compounds, but chloro constituents are often
present. Dechlorination is an important transformation process for many pesticides,
since chloro constituents often make the compound more recalcitrant. The removal of
chloro constituents may often enhance degradability of the dechlorinated metabolite
(Scheunert, 1992). Dechlorination can occur via all the above mentioned processes,
but the resulting metabolites may be different. For example, DDT (Fig. 9) is reduc-
tively dechlorinated to DDD (Glass, 1972; Zoro et al., 1974), or dehydrochlorinated to
DDE (Guenzi and Beard, 1976; Wedemeyer, 1967). Atrazine is hydrolytically dechlo-
rinated to hydroxyatrazine, whereas reductive dechlorination has not been reported.
Hydrolytic dechlorination of alachlor leads to a large number of dechlorinated meta-
bolites in groundwater samples from Massachussets (Potter and Carpenter, 1995), all
chemically different from alachlor ethanesulfonic acid formed by the dechlorination
glutathione conjugation process (Field and Thurman, 1996).
20
Fig. 9. Chemical structure of DDT and different DDT metabolites.
3.3 Abiotic versus biological transformation
Differentiating between abiotic and biological pesticide transformation processes can
be relevant. Biological enzymatic activity may enhance degradation of pesticides not
subject to abiotic transformation processes, due to lowering the activation energy
thresholds of the processes (Scheunert, 1992) and are more important in terms of
complete mineralization – and thereby to complete elimination - than abiotic pro-
cesses (Alexander, 1981).
However, abiotic and biological processes can often be difficult to distinquish from
each other, even in laboratory studies. In order to differentiate between abiotic and
biological processes, controls can be sterilized by a number of methods (e.g.
amendment with microbial inhibitors or applying heat or radiation), but the chemical
and physical properties may be changed as well (Skipper et al., 1996; Wolfe and
Macalady, 1992). In addition, many processes can occur abiotically as well as
biotically. For example, the hydrolytic dechlorination process of atrazine to hydroxy-
atrazine can occur both abiotically and microbially mediated (Kaufmann and Kearney,
1970; Skipper et al., 1967), and the hydrolytic transformation of the nitrile pesticide
21
dichlobenil to the metabolite 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM) can occur by both abiotic
and biological processes (Heinonen-Tanski, 1981).
3.4 Adaptation
Adaptation and lag phases may occur before microbial transformation processes
begin, while abiotic processes may start immediately. High pesticide concentrations
or preexposure to pesticides may therefore be important for biotic transformation, in
contrast to abiotic transformation processes, which are not enhanced by preexposure.
In fact, preexposure may in extreme situations limit further abiotic transformation,
e.g. if the factor responsible for the abiotic transformation process is being depleted.
Arildskov et al. (2000, IV) found a decrease over time in the capacity of an anaerobic
aquifer to reduce the pesticide DNOC, and attributed this to a slow renewal rate of
reactive >Fe(III)-Fe2+ surfaces of the aquifer material. The load of pesticide to the
aquifer in this case was probably much higher than in most ”real world” situations.
When low concentrations of pesticides are in question, the abiotic transformation
capacity of the aquifer is probably not depleted.
Microbial adaptation to pesticides have been reported in terms of lag phases followed
by faster degradation rates. Multible groundwater investigations show degradation of
phenoxy alkanoic acids after lag phases, both in laboratory (Heron and Christensen,
1992; Klint et al., 1993; Tuxen et al., 2000; Pedersen et al., 2000, III) and field
studies (Agertved et al., 1992; Broholm et al, 2000a). de Lipthay et al. (2000) docu-
mented adaptation of bacteria to phenoxy alkanoic acid degradation in an aquifer,
previously exposed to pesticides during a seven month injection experiment. Parts of
the aquifer exposed less or not previously exposed to pesticides showed a slower
degradation potential or none at all.
The concentration level may have been an important factor in the investigations
described above, since all - for analytical reasons - were performed with relatively
high initial pesticide concentrations, compared to what is normally found in
groundwater. Toräng et al. (2000) showed the importance of the initial concentration
22
level in terms of adaptation. For 2,4-D in samples from an aerobic sandy aquifer it
was necessary to use an initial concentration of 1 µg L-1 or less in order to observe an
exponential decrease of 2,4-D, whereas degradation curves at higher concentrations
clearly showed lag phases and subsequently much faster degradation rates (Fig. 10).
In samples from another sandy aquifer, lag phases were followed by fast degradation
for initial concentrations of p-nitrophenol in the range of 31 to 529 ng g-1, thereby
indicating adaption (Aelion et al., 1987). At a lower initial concentration (14 ng g-1)
no adaptation occurred (Fig. 11).
Fig. 10. Degradation of 2,4-D at different initial concentrations under aerobic conditions in
groundwater spiked with sediment fines from a sandy aquifer, Vejen, Denmark. From Toräng
et al., 2000.
23
(figure not available: Refer to original reference)
Fig. 11. Percent p-nitrophenol respired for different soils, Lula, Oklahoma. A: Lula soil
9MM2 at 14 ng g-1 (__▲__), 529 ng g-1 (--✶ --), B: Lula soil 9NN6 at 31 ng g-1 (__▲__), 452 ng
g-1 (--✶ --), C: Lula soil 9NN7 at 485 ng g-1 (__▲__). ± standard deviations (three or four
samples). From Aelion et al., 1987.
24
In summary, there is a potential for adaptation of groundwater bacteria to pesticide
degradation – at least for phenoxy alkanoic acids. Adaptation may be important when
dealing with aquifers that have been subject to a prolonged pesticide contamination
and/or contaminations with high concentrations of pesticide, e.g. from a point source.
Whether adaptation processes are important in non-point source situations, where the
contamination occurs in pulses and in most cases in low concentrations, is not known.
3.5 Concluding remarks
If a reductive process is the rate limiting step for pesticide transformation,
transformation may be faster under anaerobic conditions. The opposite may be true
when oxidative processes are rate limiting. For some pesticides, the redox conditions
of the aquifer may therefore be important.
Biological transformation processes necessitates presence of ”competent biomass”,
which is controlled by several factors, e.g. the redox environment. Even though high
microbial activity may enhance biological transformation processes, high activity may
also lead to more reduced conditions and thereby to changed transformation path-
ways.
25
4 Fate of selected pesticides in groundwater
4.1 S-Triazines
Several pesticides belong to the s-triazine group, amongst those atrazine, simazine,
propazine and cyanazine (Fig. 12). The most used and most frequently detected s-tria-
zine in groundwater is atrazine, and the focus of this section will be solely on atrazine.
In addition, atrazine is one of the most investigated pesticides, both in top soil and
groundwater environments. The number of investigations on the transformation pro-
cesses of atrazine under different conditions and in different environments give a
diverse picture of the potential fate of atrazine.
Fig. 12. Chemical structure of different s-triazine pesticides.
26
The primary transformation of atrazine is either via dealkylation or hydroxylation,
producing deethylatrazine (DEA), deisopropylatrazine (DIA) or hydroxyatrazine
(HA) (Fig. 13). Secundary transformation processes occur via additional dealkylation
or hydroxylation, producing degradation products like deethylhydroxyatrazine or de-
ethyldeisopropylatrazine, or by deamination producing ammelines and subsequently
ammelides and cyanuric acid (Erickson and Lee, 1989). Often the concentration of
degradation products in groundwater is larger than the concentration of atrazine alone
(Kolpin et al., 1998b; Pinsky et al., 1997; Liu et al., 1996).
Fig. 13. Chemical structure of atrazine and atrazine metabolites.
The transformation can occur via abiotic or biological processes (e.g. Kaufmann and
Kearney, 1970; Skipper et al., 1967). The different transformation processes are well
described in top soil environments (Kaufmann and Kearney, 1970; Cook, 1987;
Erickson and Lee, 1989), but also in wet land environments (DeLaune et al., 1997;
Chung et al., 1996) and submerged sediments (Mersie et al., 1998a, b). Both bacteria
(e.g. Mandelbaum et al., 1993; Radosevich et al., 1997; Yanze-Kontchou and Ge-
schwind, 1994) and fungi (e.g. Masaphy et al., 1996) are capable of atrazine
transformation. The triazine ring can be used as a source for nitrogen (e.g. Crawford
et al., 1998), but not as a source for energy, since the carbon atoms in the ring are
fully oxidized (Erickson and Lee, 1989). Therefore it is expected that energy utili-
sation only occurs in the dealkylation process.
27
Both atrazine and the primary degradation products bind to the organic phase of the
soil. DEA and DIA sorbs less than atrazine, whereas HA sorbs more (Lerch et al.,
1999; Roy and Krapac, 1994). Aging phenomenae of atrazine have been reported
from top soil investigations, due to formation of bound residues of atrazine, which are
not easily extractable (Capriel et al., 1985). In a soil lysimeter experiment, 22% of the
applied 14C-atrazine was not extractable one days after application, showing that the
non-extractable fraction may be formed fast (Barriuso and Koskinen, 1996).
The transformation processes of atrazine coupled with leaching through top soil have
been investigated in several types of top soils (Sorenson et al., 1995; Sorenson et al.,
1994; Sorenson et al., 1993). Generally, HA was the main metabolite in the top
10 cm, whereas DEA and to a lesser extent DIA were produced at higher depths.
Occurrence of HA at depths higher than 10 cm was attributed to HA formation rather
than transport from the top 10 cm, due to sorption of HA (e.g. Sorenson et al., 1995).
Atrazine is often considered recalcitrant in groundwater environments (Radosevich et
al., 1996; Adams and Thurman, 1991). A number of investigations supports this. Two
field injection experiments (Widmer and Spalding, 1995; Agertved et al., 1992),
conducted under aerobic conditions, showed no removal of atrazine within the
investigation period of up to 96 days. Papiernik and Spalding (1998) placed in situ
microcosms (ISMs) in an aerobic sand and gravel aquifer and induced denitrifying
conditions in the ISMs by adding ethanol and nitrate. No removal of atrazine, DEA or
DIA was observed within 45 days. Rügge et al. (1999) injected atrazine, together with
a number of other pollutants, in the iron and sulfate reducing zone of the landfill
leachate plume of the Grindsted landfill, but found no removal of atrazine, even after
1030 days. Parallel ISM and laboratory incubations showed similar constant atrazine
concentrations. Additionally, a number of laboratory investigations have shown no or
only minor degradation of atrazine in groundwater under both aerobic (Klint et al.,
1993; McMahon et al., 1992) and anaerobic conditions (e.g. Larsen et al., 2000a;
Larsen and Aamand, 2000).
In contrast, other laboratory investigations have shown a potential for microbial
atrazine degradation in groundwater environments, although with high initial atrazine
concentrations. Mirgain et al. (1995) investigated aerobic groundwater in batch
28
incubations without sediment and found degradation of atrazine (initial concentration
20 mg L-1) after a lag phase of 15 to 44 days. Vanderheyden et al. (1997) incubated
sandy aquifer material with atrazine at an initial concentration of 4.5 mg g-1
(corresponding to 10 mg L-1 at a water content of 45%). Atrazine was mineralized in
some but not all of the incubations, after up to 30 days lag phases. Redox conditions
were not specifically stated. Radosevich et al. (1993) found atrazine degradation in
seven out of 83 samples from a sandy aquifer, incubated aerobically at an initial
atrazine concentration of 0.1 mM (approximately 20 mg L-1).
A few number of field investigations reported disappearance of atrazine under
anaerobic conditions. Stuyfzand (1998) listed atrazine among a number of both
organic and inorganic compounds, which were removed to an extent of more than
70% after bank infiltration (BI) or artificial recharge (AR) under both “anoxic” and
“deep anoxic” conditions, defined as an environment with less than 0.5 mg/L of oxy-
gen and nitrate. de Jonge and Stäb (1998) compared atrazine fate in artificial recharge
systems under “slightly anaerobic” and “anaerobic” conditions (redox conditions not
specifically defined) and found more than 90% removal during the latter conditions.
Günther et al. (1993) found a correlation between the concentration of atrazine and
the redox potential of a river bank infiltration system, and concluded that atrazine was
eliminated under anaerobic conditions.
Common for the three cited investigations was that redox conditions were poorly
defined, and that a closer evaluation of the data presented indicated that other factors
than the redox conditions alone may have influenced the fate of atrazine, in particular
the variable load of atrazine to both artificial recharge plants and bank infiltration
facilities.
However, the reported findings correspond well to other laboratory studies. Samples
from five Dutch aquifers were investigated in laboratory incubations (van der Pas et
al., 1998). Atrazine was applied at a relatively low start concentration of 70 µg L-1.
pH, organic content of the sediment and the redox potential was measured. In the Bor-
gerswold, Papenvoort and Vierlingsbeek aquifers (Fig. 14 – top) pH was below 5.7
and the redox potential was above 430 mV, indicating fairly oxidized environments.
Organic content was less than 0.1%. Substantial amounts of atrazine were removed
29
from the water phase in these samples, but only after several years of incubation. In
the Borgerswold and Papenvoort samples the removal started immediately after the
incubation start and could be described reasonably well with first order kinetics (note
log scale). In the Vierlingsbeek samples, atrazine removal took place after a two year
period of no removal. HA was detected in samples from the Borgerswold aquifer.
(figure not available: Refer to original reference)
Fig. 14. Rate of transformation of atrazine in subsoils from five Dutch aquifers: Borgerswold,
Papenvoort, Vierlingsbeek, Genderen (sampled in 1988 and 1989), and Wassenaar 1. Average
percentage of atrazine measured (100% = 70 µg L-1), with standard error (triplicate). Lines:
Approximations by first order kinetics. Sterile: γ-radiation. Note the difference in time scale.
From van der Pas et al., 1998.
30
In samples from the Genderen aquifer (Fig. 14 – middle, note different time scale)
atrazine was removed much faster at both samplings rounds, as well as in sterile
incubations (γ-radiation). pH was neutral (6.8-7.2) in this aquifer and the redox
potential was lower (-60 to 260 mV). Organic content was 0.5 to 1.0%. In the Wasse-
naar aquifer atrazine was not removed, even after six years of incubation. This aquifer
had high pH values and the redox potential was between 270 and 480 mV and
contained less than 0.1% organic matter. The authors speculated that the relatively
high organic content of the Genderen aquifers may have catalysed atrazine transfor-
mation, and that the low redox potential of this aquifer may have made reductive de-
chlorination possible.
Similar results were obtained in samples from eight Danish aquifers (Pedersen et al.,
2000, III). The fate of a number of pesticides, including atrazine, was investigated in
laboratory batch incubations. The start concentration was 50 µg L-1 for each pesticide.
It was found that atrazine was removed from the water phase in samples from the
most reduced aquifers (iron and sulfate reducing, and methane producing) but not
under the aerobic or manganese or iron reducing conditions found in samples from
other aquifers (Fig. 15). In most cases the removal followed apparent first order kine-
tics. It was speculated that the redox conditions were controlling the fate of atrazine,
but also pointed out that the amount of sediment bound organic matter could be im-
portant, since the highest content of organic matter was found in the most reduced
aquifers. However, by similar incubation experiments with samples from the Tisvilde
Hegn aquifer, with iron and sulfate reducing and methane producing conditions
(Arildskov et al., 2000, IV), atrazine was only slightly removed within the 196 days
incubation period (Fig. 16 – middle), even though sediment bound organic matter was
0.1-0.2%.
31
Fig. 15. The concentration of atrazine as a function of time in samples from four Danish
aquifers: A: Grindsted (2.4 and 2.9 mbs: Aerobic. 6.9 and 7.4 mbs: Iron reducing). B:
Frankerup (Sulfate reducing). C: Drastrup (Sulfate and iron reducing). D: Nykøbing II
(Sulfate reducing). Dotted lines: Controls. From Pedersen et al., 2000, III.
32
Fig. 16. The concentration of A, B, 2,4,5-T; C, D, Atrazine, and E, F, DNOC over time in
samples from an anaerobic aquifer, Tisvilde Hegn, Denmark. B, D, E: Controls (amended
with 0.25 mg L-1 HgCl2). Depth below soil surface (mbs) of samples shown. 2,4,5-Tcp (2,4,5-
trichlorophenol) in samples from 3.0-3.5 mbs is a 2,4,5-T metabolite. Note different time
scale, E versus F. From Arildsskov et al., 2000, IV.
33
No lag phases were observed in the investigations, which together with lack of detec-
ting degradation products (DEA, DIA, HA) lead to the hypothesis that slow sorption
and/or formation of bound residues of either atrazine or degradation products of atra-
zine were the controlling process for the removal of atrazine. However, this hypo-
thesis was weakened by the behaviour of atrazine in mercury-amended controls where
the atrazine removal was markedly slowed down (Pedersen et al., 2000, III).
Moreover, other degradation products than the three analysed for could have been
formed, e.g. by reductive dechlorination, and the possibility of mineralization could
not be ruled out.
Therefore, additional investigations, using sediment and groundwater from the sulfate
reducing Nykøbing II aquifer, focused on specifying the fate of atrazine (Pedersen and
Albrechtsen, 2000, V). Chloroform amendment and heat-sterilization were used to
sterilize incubates parallel to mercury. Results showed a removal of atrazine in the
chloroform and autoclaved controls at the same rate as in the live incubates, whereas
mercury in this investigation also slowed the removal process down (Table 1).
Thereby it was confirmed that an abiotic process was responsible, and that mercury
apparently influenced this process by some unknown mechanism, perhaps by sorption
to the same sites as atrazine.
34
Table 1. First order rate constants (10-3 day-1) for atrazine (measured by HPLC) and atrazine
and dissolved metabolites (measured as 14C-activity) in samples from the sulfate reducing
Nykøbing II aquifer. Values in brackets are standard deviations (N=6 or 2). From Pedersen
and Albrechtsen, 2000c, V.
k (10-3 day-1)
HPLC
k (10-3 day-1) 14C-activity
Biologically active bioassays
10 µg L-1 7.8 10.4
12 µg L-1 8.2 8.6
20 µg L-1 5.8 5.5
30 µg L-1 6.4 5.2
65 µg L-1 8.3 5.0
100 µg L-1 8.9 7.6
Average (N=6) 7.6 [1.1] 7.1 [2.2]
Control bioassays
Autoclaved 3 x (121°C, 20 min) (N=2) 8.7 [2.5] 6.0 [0.8]
Chloroform (8.6 g L-1) (N=2) 6.9 [1.2] 5.2 [1.3]
HgCl2 (158 mg L-1) (N=2) 2.3 [0.2] 4.3 [1.3]
HgCl2 (15.8 mg L-1) (N=2) 4.8 [1.1] 4.6 [1.0]
Azide (2 g L-1) (N=2) 165.0 [1.2] 3.5 [1.5]
Ring-labelled 14C-atrazine was used in the investigation in order to specify the fate of
atrazine in more detail. 14CO2 was not produced, ruling out a mineralization process,
and the amount of soluble 14C-activity corresponded to the concentration of atrazine,
showing that soluble degradation products were not formed (Table 1). Approximately
20% of the applied atrazine was non-extractable in samples terminated at day 63 and
day 187 (Fig. 17), showing that formation of non-extractable residues could also take
place in low organic carbon sediment and not only in top soils. Therefore, the
hypothesis was supported that slow and irreversible sorption and an eventual
formation of bound residues controlled atrazine removal. However, the role of both
35
the redox conditions and the organic content of the aquifers was not definitely
established.
Fig. 17. Recovery of 14C-activity (14C-atrazine) in day 63 and day 187 samples from the
Nykøbing II aquifer. Removed: Removed at samplings during incubation. Remaining:
Remaining in water phase. CaCl2: Extracted by 0.01 M CaCl2. I-IV: Methanol/water (*) or
methanol/formic acid (°), respectively. Residual: 14C-activity measured by sediment
combustion after extraction. Extraction IV for day 187 samples lasted nine days. Extraction
IV for day 63 samples with methanol/water was with methanol/formic acid. Bars indicate one
standard deviation of the residual 14C-activity (duplicates). From Pedersen and Albrechtsen,
2000c, V.
In summary, although atrazine may be the most investigated pesticide in terms of
environmental fate, the reports on its behaviour under groundwater conditions are
often contradicting, showing that the role of the different processes, which may be
important under different aquifer conditions, is not well understood. Groundwater
bacteria are able to transform and mineralize atrazine, at least at high concentrations
and under aerobic conditions. In reduced and/or high-organic containing aquifers
there may be a potential for atrazine removal due to slow sorption and formation of a
non-extractable fraction.
36
4.2 Phenoxy alkanoic acids
In top soil phenoxy alkanoic acids (Fig. 18) are readily degraded (Smith, 1989).
Degradation has also been reported from wet land areas (Larsen et al., 2000b) and
marine and estuarine sediments (Boyle et al., 1999). The primary transformation
pathway under aerobic conditions is by biological decarboxylation to the
corresponding chlorophenols, followed by catechol formation which destabilizes the
ring and eventually leads to ring cleavage (e.g. Evans et al., 1971; Don et al. 1985).
Dechlorination can also occur either prior to or after decarboxylation (Evans et al.,
1971). Due to low sorption phenoxy alkanoic acids are readily transported through the
top soil and the unsaturated soil into the groundwater.
Fig. 18. Chemical structure of different phenoxy alcanoic acid pesticides.
37
Several investigations have shown the potential for aerobic degradation in
groundwater environments of the phenoxy alkanoic acids MCPP (Agertved et al.,
1992; Heron and Christensen, 1992; Klint et al., 1993; Larsen et al., 2000a; Larsen
and Aamand, 2000; Tuxen et al., 2000; Broholm et al., 2000a), dichlorprop (Tuxen et
al., 2000; Broholm et al., 2000a), 2,4-D (Tuxen et al., 2000; Kuhlmann et al., 1995),
MCPA (Kuhlmann et al., 1995) and 2,4,5-T (Kuhlmann et al., 1995). In contrast,
Pedersen et al. (2000, III) found no degradation (within 365-371 days) of MCPP and
dichlorprop in laboratory batch incubations with groundwater and sediment material
from the aerobic Grindsted and Bromme aquifers (not shown), and degradation of
MCPA, 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T in samples from the Grindsted aquifer only (Fig. 19).
Similarily, MCPP, 2,4-D and dichlorprop were not degraded in some laboratory batch
incubations with material from an aerobic sandy aquifer (de Lipthay et al., 2000), and
MCPP was not degraded within a period of 200 days in samples from a chalk aquifer
(Johnson et al., 2000).
38
Fig. 19. The concentration of phenoxy alcanoic acid pesticides as a function of time for
selected samples from two Danish aquifers, Grindsted (aerobic) and Frankerup (sulfate
reducing). A: MCPA, B: 2,4-D, C: 2,4,5-T, D: Dichlorprop. Dotted lines: Controls. From
Pedersen et al., 2000, III.
39
Dechlorination may be the first transformation step under anaerobic conditions, as
shown for 2,4,5-T in samples from a methanogenic aquifer (Gibson and Suflita,
1990). Decarboxylation may also be the first transformation step, as shown for 2,4,5-
T (Arildskov et al., 2000, IV) and 2,4-D (Gibson and Suflita, 1986), subsequently
followed by dechlorination. Pedersen et al. (2000, III) observed degradation of
dichlorprop and 2,4-D in one out of three samples from one (the Frankerup aquifer)
out of seven investigated anaerobic aquifers (Fig. 19), and no degradation (within
365-371 days) of MCPP, 2,4,5-T and MCPA in any of the investigated anaerobic
samples (not shown). Whether dechlorination or decarboxylation was the first step
was not evaluated. In the anaerobic Tisvilde Hegn aquifer (Arildskov et al., 2000, IV)
2,4,5-T was decarboxylated in samples taken from the iron and sulfate reducing zone,
but not in samples from the sulfate reducing zone located 0.5 m below the iron
reducing zone, and in samples from a methanogenic zone deeper in the aquifer (Fig.
16 – top). This indicated a connection between iron reduction and degradation of
2,4,5-T in this specific aquifer. In contrast, Rügge et al. (1999) observed no
degradation of MCPP in a 1030 days injection experiment in a landfill leachate plume
under iron and sulfate reducing conditions, and Kuhlmann et al. (1995) observed no
degradation of 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and MCPA in aquifer columns operated at sulfate
reducing conditions.
In summary, the investigations indicate a widely distributed potential for phenoxy
alkanoic acid degradation in aquifers under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, but
also that the potential is not generally present, and that other factors than the redox
environment may influence the fate of phenoxy alkanoic acids. The commonly found
lag phases show that microorganisms may adapt to phenoxy alkanoic acid degra-
dation. The higher degradation rates in such cases may not be relevant in connection
with low concentration contaminated aquifers.
4.3 Nitroaromatic pesticides
DNOC and dinoseb (Fig. 20) both contain nitro substituents, and therefore are expec-
ted to be subject to reduction from nitro to amino substituents, as well as by dealkyl-
40
ation (Stevens et al., 1991). Aerobic degradation of dinoseb is possible, but anaerobic
degradation is faster and may lead to complete mineralization (Stevens et al., 1991),
showing a potential for degradation in anaerobic groundwater.
Fig. 20. Chemical structure of two nitroaromatic pesticides.
In groundwater investigations DNOC was used as a model compound under both
aerobic and anaerobic conditions. In an aerobic column study, DNOC was trans-
formed after a 80 days lag phase period (Tuxen et al., 2000), and in a field injection
experiment DNOC sorbed to the sediment, apparently controlled by the groundwater
pH, but was also degraded (Broholm et al., 2000b). In laboratory batch incubations
DNOC was not degraded under aerobic conditions (Pedersen et al., 2000, III).
Under anaerobic conditions fast and apparently first order degradation of DNOC was
observed (Pedersen et al., 2000, III; Arildskov et al., 2000, IV). DNOC trans-
formation also occurred in mercury amended controls, showing the process to be
abiotic, but degradation rates were generally slower in the controls (Fig. 21,
fig. 16 - bottom).
41
Fig. 21. The concentration of DNOC as a function of time in samples from four Danish
aquifers. A: Grindsted (2.4 and 2.9 mbs: Aerobic. 6.9 and 7.4 mbs: Iron reducing). B:
Frankerup (Sulfate reducing). C: Drastrup (Sulfate and iron reducing). D: Nykøbing II
(Sulfate reducing). Dotted lines: Controls. From Pedersen et al., 2000, III.
42
It was speculated that DNOC was reduced by Fe2+ sorbed at Fe(III) (hydr)oxide
surfaces as reported for other nitroaromatic compounds (Hofstetter et al., 1999; Rügge
et al., 1998; Klausen et al., 1995), and that mercury desorbed Fe2+, thereby inhibiting
the process. However, Fe2+ was probably not the only reductant, since DNOC was
also degraded in samples with less Fe2+ present at the sediment (Arildskov et al.,
2000, IV). In these sediments other reductants, like hydrogen or reduced organic
matter, could be responsible for the transformation of DNOC. In a parallel anaerobic
field injection experiment (Arildskov et al., 2000, IV) DNOC was also transformed
under iron and sulfate reducing conditions, but with much faster rates. It was
speculated that the sediment to groundwater ratios might influence the transformation
rates, in good agreement with the >Fe(III)/Fe2+ surface process being responsible. By
normalizing first order degradation rates with sediment/water ratios field rates were
comparable with laboratory rates. It was not attempted to identify degradation
products of DNOC.
In conclusion, due to the nitro substituents, nitroaromatic pesticides seem to be readily
degradable in anaerobic groundwater environments, and apparently also in certain
cases under aerobic conditions. Whether complete mineralization occurs or whether
recalcitrant metabolites are formed is not known, but the findings show the relevance
of analyzing for reduced metabolites of nitroaromatic pesticides in groundwater.
4.4 Acetanilide pesticides
Alachlor, metolachlor and acetochlor (Fig. 22) are degradable in top soil (Stolpe and
Shea, 1995; Pothuluri et al., 1990), in aquatic environments (Graham et al., 1999) and
to some extent also in groundwater. Radosevich et al. (1993) saw a 17-57% decrease
in alachlor concentrations after 138 days in four out of 81 aquifer sediment samples
incubated aerobically. Cavalier et al. (1991) incubated groundwater samples with
alachlor and metolachlor and saw degradation after lag phases of eight months or
more. Oxygen content of the groundwater was not reported, but small contents of
nitrate (0.44-0.88 mg/L) indicated oxidized conditions. Novick et al. (1986) saw
43
transformation but not mineralization of alachlor and another acetanilide pesticide,
propachlor, in samples from an aerobic aquifer (after 47 days of incubation).
Fig. 22. Chemical structure of different acetanilide pesticides.
Degradation products were more stable than the mother compound under groundwater
conditions (Clay et al., 1997; Pothuluri et al., 1990). Potter and Carpenter (1995)
detected 20 possible degradation products from alachlor in groundwater taken from
wells installed in corn fields with the last application of alachlor three years
previously. The redox conditions of the groundwater were not reported. 30 months
later they analysed samples from the same wells, finding qualitively the same com-
pounds and indicating recalcitrance of the degradation products. Especially the sul-
fonic and oxanilic acid metabolites contribute to the total amount of the acetanilide
44
pesticides, detected from 3 to 45 times more frequently than the parent compounds
(Kalkhoff et al., 1998) and in concentrations substantially higher (Phillips et al., 1999;
Kolpin et al., 1996). Pothuluri et al. (1990) investigated degradation of alachlor in soil
from a surface to groundwater profile (surface soil, vadose sediments and
groundwater sediments) of an aerobic aquifer, and saw markedly slower trans-
formation rates going from the top of the profile to the bottom. Samples were also
incubated anaerobically (purging incubation bottles with a N2/H2/CO2 gas mixture),
and significantly slower rates were obtained under these conditions.
Phillips et al. (1999) proposed the ratio of metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA) to
metolachlor as a tool to assess infiltration rates of groundwater. Assuming that
degradation to metolachlor ESA occurs only in top soil, a low ratio would indicate
fast transport, whereas a high ratio would indicate a longer contact time to the top soil.
Groundwater degradation under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, however,
would give large ratios, even though transport through top soil was fast.
4.5 Phenylurea pesticides
Isoproturon (Fig. 23) is readily degradable in top soils (Pieuchot et al., 1996; Issa and
Wood, 1999), and mineralization of isoproturon occurred in wet land sediments under
aerobic but not anaerobic conditions (Larsen et al., 2000b). A top soil study showed
that degradation of other phenylurea pesticides (diuron, linuron, monuron and
metoxuron) was slower than degradation of isoproturon (Cox et al., 1996), but
Vroumsia et al. (1996) evaluated the ability of soil fungi to degrade different
phenylurea pesticides, and found several strains that were able to degrade e.g. diuron
faster than isoproturon.
Fig. 23. Chemical structure of isoproturon.
45
Johnson et al. (1998) showed a potential for transformation of isoproturon under
aerobic conditions in laboratory batch incubations with groundwater and sediment
material from a chalk aquifer, with monodesmethyl-isoproturon as the primary
metabolite (Johnson et al., 2000). Mineralization did not occur. Likewise minera-
lization did not occur in aerobic or anaerobic laboratory batch incubations with
material from a sandy aquifer (Larsen et al., 2000a). No transformation of isoproturon
occurred in laboratory batch incubations with groundwater and sediment material
from eight aerobic and anaerobic aquifers (Pedersen et al., 2000, III), in a column
study with aerobic groundwater material (Tuxen et al., 2000), or in an aerobic field
injection experiment (Broholm et al., 2000a). In conclusion, the potential for
isoproturon degradation under both aerobic and anaerobic groundwater conditions
seems to be limited, at least in sandy aquifers.
4.6 Benzothiadiazone pesticides
Bentazone (Fig. 24) was degradable under aerobic conditions in top soils, both by
photolysis and microbial hydrolysis processes, whereas degradation ceased under
anaerobic conditions (Huber and Otto, 1995). Bentazone is readily transported to the
underlying sediments and groundwater due to limited sorption (Romero et al., 1996).
Fig. 24. Chemical structure of bentazone.
Bentazone was slowly degradable in samples from a number of aerobic aquifers from
the Netherlands (van der Pas et al., 1998). In the Borgerswold aquifer (Fig. 25 – top)
46
the bentazone concentration decreased to 74% after 1.6 years, but after 3.9 years only
3 % remained. In other aerobic aquifers (Papenvoort and Vierlingsbeek) first order
half-lifes were 1.5 and 2.5 years, respectively. In samples from the anaerobic Gen-
deren and Wassenaar aquifers (Fig 25 – middle and bottom) the concentration of ben-
tazone decreased only insignificantly within 5.3 years. However, when some of the
Genderen incubates were contaminated with air (open circles), bentazone transfor-
mation increased substantially. Other laboratory investigations, with durations of one
year or less, showed no transformation of bentazone under both aerobic (Broholm et
al., 2000a; Tuxen et al., 2000) and anaerobic conditions (Pedersen et al., 2000, III).
(figure not available: Refer to original reference)
Fig. 25. Rate of transformation of bentazone in subsoils from five Dutch aquifers:
Borgerswold, Papenvoort, Vierlingsbeek, Genderen (sampled in 1988 and 1989), and
Wassenaar 2. Average percentage of bentazone measured (100% = 70 µg L-1), with standard
error (triplicate). Lines represent approximations by first order kinetics. Genderen 1988:
Percentage of bentazone in individual incubations with a redox potential ( ✕ ) lower or ( O )
higher than 0-26 V. Note the difference in time scale. From van der Pas et al., 1998.
47
In conclusion, bentazone is nondegradable or very slowly degradable in groundwater.
The investigations by van der Pas et al. (1998) indicated a redox impact on bentazone
degradability, as also seen in top soil, but also pointed out that pH was high in the
anaerobic aquifers and lower in the aerobic aquifers, indicating pH to be a possible
controlling factor as well.
4.7 Nitrile pesticides
Chlorthiamid and dichlobenil (Fig. 26) are readily degradable by both abiotic but
mainly biological processes in top soil (Heinonen-Tanski, 1981; Verloop, 1972) and
only shows limited transport to groundwater due to sorption. Chlortiamid is degraded
to dichlobenil or to 2,6-dichlorbenzamide (BAM – fig. 26), which also is the primary
degradation product of dichlobenil (Verloop, 1972; Beynon and Wright, 1972). BAM
is further degraded to 2,6-dichlorobenzoic acid, but only to a limited extent (Beynon
and Wright, 1972). BAM is much less sorbing than the parent compounds and is
readily transported through the top soil to underlying sediments.
Fig. 26. Chemical structure of two nitrile pesticides and nitrile pesticide metabolite 2,6-
dichlorobenzamide (BAM).
Due to the sorption behaviour of chlorthiamid and dichlobenil only few reports on
detections in groundwater exist. Eades (1992) reported on the presence of dichlobenil
in groundwater three years after a heavy rain event had washed a recently applied
48
amount of Prefix G (containing dichlobenil as the active ingredient) through the
unsaturated zone to the groundwater. Neither the redox conditions nor the presence of
BAM at the site were reported. Pedersen et al. (2000, III) found persistence of both
dichlobenil and BAM over a period of 365-371 days in laboratory incubations with
both aerobic and anaerobic sediment from different aquifers, and persistence of BAM
under aerobic conditions was also found in other field and column studies (Tuxen et
al., 2000; Broholm et al., 2000a).
In summary, nitrile pesticides seem to be recalcitrant in groundwater environments,
regardless of redox conditions. BAM is often found in Danish groundwater (GEUS,
1999), but probably due to dichlobenil transformation to BAM in top soil, followed by
transport of BAM to the groundwater, rather than production of BAM in the
groundwater.
4.8 Concluding remarks
In general, the investigations showed that certain pesticides were degradable in
groundwater environment and other pesticides seemed to be recalcitrant in
groundwater, at least under the variety of conditions investigated. For the degradable
pesticides certain conditions were needed in order for degradation to occur.
The total number of pesticide fate investigations in groundwater are sparse, especially
given the large number of pesticides used and the high number of different pesticides
found in groundwater. The phenoxy alkanoic acids and the s-triazine pesticide
atrazine, which are amongst the pesticides most investigated, show some general
trends of behavior, but also seemingly ”conflicting” behaviour in different aquifers
and aquifer environments. Even for these ”well known” pesticides there seems to be a
need for further investigations.
Other relevant but less investigated pesticide compounds – like the phenylurea and
acetanilide pesticides – may show the same ”conflicting” behaviour if the number of
investigations are expanded.
49
5 Discussion and Perspectives
5.1 Effect of the groundwater redox environment
One of the objectives of this thesis was to investigate the role of the groundwater
redox environments in controlling pesticide fate. The redox environment seemed to
influence both abiotic and biological transformation processes for some of the
pesticides. Reductive processes occurred in terms of nitro group reduction of
nitroaromatic pesticides, like DNOC and dinoseb, and reductive dechlorination of
DDT and phenoxy alkanoic acids (e.g. 2,4,5-T). However, not only reductive proces-
ses were responsible for degradation of phenoxy alkanoic acids, since decarboxylation
could also be the initial transformation step of 2,4,5-T. Aldicarb and DDT were
degradable under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, but the transformation
processes differed substantially, and lead to different metabolites.
The phenoxy alkanoic acids were degradable under both aerobic and anaerobic
conditions, although there might be a tendency towards aerobic transformation
occurring more frequently. In some investigations, however, aerobic phenoxy
alkanoic acid degradation did not occur, or degradation occurred sporadically even in
apparently similar samples. Several studies indicated adaptation to phenoxy alkanoic
acids and that a certain threshold exposure amount had to be exceeded prior to
adaptation.
A connection between atrazine removal and anaerobic conditions was observed, both
in laboratory experiments and in ”real world” investigations, but whether the redox
environment directly influenced atrazine fate was not conclusively determined.
Since pesticides are chemically very diverse, it may not be surprising that the different
pesticides were influenced differently by the redox environment and that some pesti-
cides seemed to be generally recalcitrant regardless the redox environment.
50
5.2 Degradability in ”real world” systems
Very few investigations deal with pesticide degradability in ”real world” aquifer sys-
tems, and observed degradability is almost solely based on results from controlled ex-
periments. High concentrations of pesticides (more than 25 µg L-1) and constant
exposure are common characteristics of most laboratory investigations, where it is
more likely that a pesticide contaminated aquifer would be characterized as being ex-
posed in irregular pulses – e.g. after pesticide field application combined with rain
events – with low pesticide concentrations (below 10 µg L-1). The observed laboratory
degradability is therefore potential degradability.
On the other hand, it could be speculated that non-degradability in a constant expo-
sure/high concentration system might also be transferable to non-degradability in a
low concentration/pulse exposure system. This seems likely for biological trans-
formation processes, as long as the high concentration is non-toxic to the microbial
population.
It should be noted, however, that non-degradability is a function of experimental setup
as well as pesticide and aquifer characteristics, and that non-degradability within the
length of laboratory experiments (typically up to a few hundred days) is to be
compared with the groundwater residence time, which can be decades or longer. Even
though e.g 95% of the applied pesticide in a laboratory experiment is still present after
an investigation period of 100 days, a removal of 5% would correspond to significant
”real world” transformation within e.g. 10 years.
5.3 Interpreting ”real world” data
In Figure 1 (Barbash et al., 1999) the agricultural use of pesticides was compared with
groundwater detections. The role of the aquifer seemed to be minor, since the
presence of pesticides in aquifers to a large extent was explainable by top soil factors
like the aerobic half-life. This is not surprising, since a simple mass balance shows
that the top soil must remove almost all of the applied pesticide. Only a very small
51
fraction of the total load of pesticide actually finds its way to the groundwater, and the
potential role of the aquifers in controlling the presence of pesticides may in most
situations be hidden by the paramount role of the top soil.
None the less, it seems as if the role of the aquifer in statistical pesticide fate investi-
gations is often neglected compared to other factors. Especially the biological proces-
ses of groundwater are not considered important. Barbash et al. (1999) listed several
factors of importance in terms of pesticide detections in groundwater (Table 2).
Aquifer factors were related solely to hydrogeology and not to chemistry or biology,
and pesticide mobility and pesticide persistence referred to top soil – not to ground-
water – characteristics.
The investigations presented in the previous chapters showed at least in some cases a
potential for pesticide degradability in groundwater. It therefore could be argued that
including groundwater characteristics – e.g. water chemistry – in statistical analysis
might reveal statistical relations of interest to pesticide fate in groundwater. In an
interesting study of the occurrence of pesticides and pesticide metabolites in the
groundwater of Iowa, pesticide occurrence was compared to well depth and the
concentration of dissolved oxygen (Kolpin et al., 1997). Both parameters were used as
“rough surrogates” for groundwater age, and a significant positive relation to oxygen
content indicated that pesticides were mainly found in young groundwater. It would
have been interesting to use the knowledge of oxygen content to assess whether the
investigated aquifers were aerobic, and whether specific pesticides were mainly found
under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
52
Table 2. Factors associated with pesticide detections in groundwater. Adapted from Barbash
et al., 1999.
Factors associated with increased likelihood of pesticide detections
Study design: - Lower analytical detection limits
- Targeting areas of higher presumed or known
vulnerability
- Targeting areas of known or suspected contamination
Pesticide Properties: - Greater pesticide mobility (lower KOC)
- Greater pesticide persistence (lower reactivity)
Agricultural Management
Practices:
- Higher pesticide use
- Increasing proximity to pesticide application areas
- Reductions in depth or frequency of tillage
Well Characteristics: - Decreasing well depth
- Dug or driven (versus drilled) wells
- Poorer integrity of surficial or annular well seals
Hydrogeologic and Edaphic
Factors:
- Unconsolidated aquifer materials (versus bedrock)
- Decreasing depth of upper surface of aquifer
- Decreasing thickness or absence of confining layers
- Higher hydraulic conductivity
- Higher soil permeability
- Increased karstification
- Increased recharge (from precipitation or irrigation)
- Younger groundwater age
Other redox relevant compounds – nitrate, Fe2+, sulfide, methane – as well as mea-
sures of other parameters (e.g. nutrients, pH and content of organic matter) and know-
ledge of previous exposure history – could be included in statistical analysis in order
to find statistical relations. Such relations might be explainable by results from more
controlled investigations, might confirm results from controlled experiments, or –
53
perhaps most important – might give leads and ideas to new controlled investigations
of possible relations.
The absolute concentration of pesticides in groundwater is often difficult to interpret
in terms of groundwater degradation since it is also a function of pesticide load,
transport, sorption and degradation in top soil. Therefore metabolite/parent compound
ratios might be of use to assess groundwater degradability. Such ratios have been
applied for triazine and acetanilide pesticides and used to assess top soil residence
time. Using metabolite/parent compound ratios might be useful to assess groundwater
degradation, if the top soil residence time could be determined by other methods, e.g.
modelling or groundwater age determination. In young groundwater a high metabo-
lite/parent compound ratio might indicate groundwater transformation, and a low
metabolite/parent compound ratio would indicate not only low transformation in the
top soil but also low transformation in the groundwater.
Difficulties in establishing real world behaviour of xenobiotics is not only related to
pesticides in groundwater. Even for “well known” compounds like the chlorinated
solvents and BTEX compounds, and for known point source pollutions with more
complex mixtures with xenobiotics (e.g. landfill leachate plumes), the complexity of
the natural environments makes an interpretation of real world data difficult. It may
be even more difficult to assess pesticide fate, due to the chemical diversity of
pesticides and the non-point source characteristics of most pesticide pollutions. The
above mentioned approaches – integrating knowledge of aquifer characteristics in
statistical analysis and using metabolites/parent compound ratios – may still be diffi-
cult to interpret, but may be a first step towards a better understanding of pesticide
degradability in groundwater.
54
6 References
Adams CD, Thurman EM (1991) Formation and transport of deethylatrazine in the soil and vadose zone. J Environ Qual 20:540-547 Aelion CM, Swindoll CM, Pfaender FK (1987) Adaptation to and biodegradation of xenobiotic compounds by microbial communities from a pristine aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2212-2217 Agertved J, Rügge K, Barker JF (1992) Transformation of the herbicides MCPP and atrazine under natural aquifer conditions. Ground Water 30:500-506 Albrechtsen H-J, Heron G, Christensen TH (1995) Limiting factors for microbial Fe(III)-reduction in a landfill leachate polluted aquifer (Vejen, Denmark). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 16:233-248 Alexander M (1981) Biodegradation of chemicals of environmental concern. Science 211:132-138 Alvarez PJJ, Vogel TM (1995) Degradation of BTEX and their aerobic metabolites by indigenous microorganisms under nitrate reducing conditions. Wat Sci Tech 31:15-28 Appelo CAJ, Postma D (1993) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution. AA Balkema, Rotterdam Balkwill DL, Boone DR (1997) Identity and diversity of microorganisms cultured from subsurface environments. In: Amy PS, Haldeman DL (eds.) The microbiology of the terrestrial deep subsurface. CRC Press, Boca Raton Barbash JE, Thelin GP, Kolpin DW, Gilliom RJ (1999) Distribution of major herbicides in ground water of the United States. USGS, USEPA, Office of Pesticide Programs, Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4245 Barriuso E, Koskinen WC (1996) Incorporating nonextractable atrazine residues into soil size fractions as a function of time. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:150-157 Beynon KI, Wright AN (1972) The fates of the herbicides chlorthiamid and dichlobenil in relation to residues in crops, soils, and animals. Residue Rev 43:23-53
55
Boone DR, Liu Y, Zhao Z-J, Balkwill DL, Drake GR, Stevens TO, Aldrich HC (1995) Bacillus infernus sp. nov., an Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-reducing anaerobe from the deep terrestrial subsurface. Intern J Syst Bacteriol 45:441-448 Boyle AW, Knight VK, Häggblom MM, Young LY (1999) Transformation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in four different marine and estuarine sediments: effects of sulfate, hydrogen and acetate on dehalogenation and side-chain cleavage. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29:105-113 Broholm MM, Rügge K, Tuxen N, Højberg AL, Mosbæk H, Bjerg PL (2000a). Fate of herbicides in a shallow aerobic aquifer: A continuous field injection experiment, Vejen, Denmark. Submitted to Water Resour Res. Broholm MM, Tuxen N, Rügge K, Bjerg PL (2000b) Sorption and degradation of the herbicide DNOC in a shallow aerobic aquifer: Field injection experiments, Vejen, Denmark. In preparation for Environ Sci Technol Brown CJ, Coates JD, Schoonen MAA (1999) Localized sulfate-reducing zones in a coastal plain aquifer. Ground Water 37:505-516 Capriel P, Haisch A, Khan SU (1985) Distribution and nature of bound (nonextractable) residues of atrazine in a mineral soil nine years after the herbicide application. J Agric Food Chem 33:567-569 Cavalier TC, Lavy TL, Mattice JD (1991) Persistence of selected pesticides in ground-water samples. Ground Water 29:225-231 Chapelle FH (1993) Ground-water microbiology and geochemistry. Wiley, New York Chapelle FH, Lovley DR (1990) Rates of microbial metabolism in deep coastal plain aquifers. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1865-1874 Chapelle FH, Lovley DR (1992) Competitive exclusion of sulfate reduction by Fe(III)-reducing bacteria: A mehanism for producing discrete zones of high-iron ground water. Ground Water 30:29-36 Chapelle FH, McMahon PB, Dubrovsky NM, Fujii RM, Oaksford ET, Vroblesky DA (1995) Deducing the distribution of terminal electron-accepting processes in hydrologically diverse groundwater systems. Wat Resour Res 31:359-371
56
Christensen TH, Bjerg PL, Banwart SA, Jakobsen R, Heron G, Albrechtsen H-J (2000) Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater contaminated plumes. J Contam Hydrol, accepted Chung KH, Ro KS, Roy D (1996) Fate and enhancement of atrazine biotrans-formation in anaerobic wetland sediment. Wat Res 30:341-346 Clay SA, Moorman TB, Clay DE, Scholes KA (1997) Sorption and degradation of alachlor in soil and aquifer material. J Environ Qual 26:1348-1353 Cook, AM (1987) Biodegradation of s-triazine xenobiotics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46:93-116 Cox L, Walker A, Welch SJ (1996) Evidence for the accelerated degradation of isoproturon in soils. Pestic Sci 48:253-260 Cozzarelli IM, Suflita JM, Ulrich GA, Harris SH, Scholl MA, Schlottmann JL, Jaeschke JB (1999) Biogeochemical processes in a contaminant plume downgradient from a landfill, Norman, Oklahoma. USGS Water resources Investigations Report 99-4018C Crawford JJ, Sims GK, Mulvaney RL, Radosevich M (1998) Biodegradation of atrazine under denitrifying conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:618-623 de Jonge HG, Stäb JA (1998) Fate and behaviour of atrazin in the Meijendel artificial recharge system. Proceedings of the third international symposium on artificial recharge of groundwater – TISAR 98, September 21-25. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam DeLaune RD, Devai I, Mulbah C, Crozier C, Lindau CW (1997) The influence of soil redox conditions on atrazine degradation in wetlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 66:41-46 de Lipthay JR, Johnsen K, Aamand J, Tuxen N, Albrechtsen H-J, Bjerg PL (2000) Continous exposure of pesticides in an aquifer changes microbial biomass, diversity and degradation. In: Bjerg, PL, Engesgaard P, Krom, TD (eds.) Groundwater 2000. Proceedings of the International Conference on Groundwater Research, Copenhagen, 6-8 June. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 223-228
57
Don RH, Weightman AJ, Knackmuss H-J, Timmis KN (1985) Transposon mutage-nesis and cloning analysis of the pathways for degradation of 2.4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid and 3-chlorobenzoate in Alcaligenes eutrophus JMP134(pJP4). J Bacteriol 161:85-90 Eades JF (1992) A note on the persistence of the herbicide dichlobenil in groundwater. Irish J Agric Food Res 31:81-83 EEC directive (1980) EEC council directive on drinking water (80/778/EEC). Off J European Communities, No. L. 229, 30 August Erickson LE, Lee KH (1989) Degradation of atrazine and related s-triazines. Crit Rev Environ Cont 19:1-14 European Environment Agency (1999) Groundwater quality and quantity in Europe – Environmental assesment report No 3., Copenhagen Evans WC, Smith BSW, Fernley HN, Davies JI (1971) Bacterial metabolism of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate. Biochem J 122:543-551 Field J, Thurman EM (1996) Glutathione conjugation and contaminant trans-formation. Environ Sci Technol 30: 1413-1418 Francis AJ, Slater JM, Dodge CJ (1989) Denitrification in deep subsurface sediments. Geomicrobiol J 7:103-116 GEUS (1999) Pesticides and degradation products. In: Groundwater monitoring 1999 (in Danish). Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen Gibson SA, Suflita JM (1986) Extrapolation of biodegradation results to groundwater aquifers: Reductive dehalogenation of aromatic compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:681-688 Gibson SA, Suflita JM (1990) Anaerobic biodegradation of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy-acetic acid in samples from a methanogenic aquifer: Stimulation by short-chain organic acids and alcohols. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1825-1832
58
Glass BL (1972) Relation between the degradation of DDT and the iron redox system in soils. J Agric Food Chem 20:324-327 Graham WH, Graham DW, Denoyelles F Jr., Smith VH, Larive CK, Thurman EM (1999) Metolachlor and alachlor breakdown product formation patterns in aquatic field mesocosms. Environ Sci Technol 33:4471-4476 Guenzi WD, Beard WE (1976) The effects of temperature and soil water on conversion of DDT to DDE in soil. J Environ Qual 5:243-246 Günther WJ, Lintelmann J, Rose E, Kettrup A (1993) Behaviour of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and triazine herbicides in water and aquifer material of a drinking water recharge plant. Part III. Investigations of the behaviour of triazine herbicides during the underground passage. Fresenius' J Anal Chem 347:37-43 Heinonen-Tanski H (1981) The interaction of microorganisms and the herbicides chlorthiamid and dichlobenil. J Sci Agric Soc Finland 53:341-390 Heron G, Christensen TH (1992) Degradation of the herbicide mecoprop in an aerobic aquifer determined by laboratory batch studies. Chemosphere 24:547-557 Hofstetter TB, Heijman CG, Haderlein SB, Holliger C, Schwarzenbach RP (1999) Complete reduction of TNT and other (poly)nitroaromatic compounds under iron-reducing subsurface conditions. Environ Sci Technol 33:1479-1487 Huber R, Otto S (1995) Assessment of the behaviour of the herbicide bentazone in soil. BCPC Monograph 62: Pesticide movement to water: 229-236 Issa S, Wood M (1999) Degradation of atrazine and isoproturon in the unsaturated zone: A study from Southern England. Pestic Sci 55:539-545 Jakobsen R, Postma D (1999) Redox zoning, rates of sulfate reduction and interactions with Fe-reduction and methanogenesis in a shallow sandy aquifer, Rømø, Denmark. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:137-151 Johnson AC, Hughes CD, Williams RJ, Chilton PJ (1998) Potential for aerobic iso-proturon biodegradation and sorption in the unsaturated and saturated zones of a chalk aquifer. J Contam Hydrol 30:281-297
59
Johnson AC, White C, Bhardwaj CL (2000) Potential for isoproturon, atrazine and mecoprop to be degraded within a chalk aquifer system. Accepted for publication J Contam Hydrol Kalkhoff SJ, Kolpin DW, Thurman EM, Ferrer I, Barcelo D (1998) Degradation of chloroacetanilide herbicides: The prevalence of sulfonic and oxanilic acid metabolites in Iowa groundwaters and surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 32:1738-1740 Kaufmann DD, Kearney PC (1970) Microbial degradation of s-triazine herbicides. Residue Rev 32:235-265 Kazumi J, Capone DG (1995) Microbial aldicarb transformation in aquifer, lake, and salt marsh sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:2820-2829 Khan SU (1982) Bound pesticide residues in soil and plants. Residue Rev 84:1-25 Kieft TL, Fredrickson JK, McKinley JP, Bjornstad BN, Rawson SA, Phelps TJ, Brockman FJ, Pfiffner SM (1995) Microbial comparisons within and across contigious lacustrine, paleosol, and fluvial subsurface sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:749-757 Kieft TL, Phelps TJ (1997) Life in the slow lane: Activities of microorganisms in the subsurface. In: Amy PS, Haldeman DL (eds.) The microbiology of the terrestrial deep subsurface. CRC Press, Boca Raton Klausen J, Tröber SP, Haderlein SB, Schwarzenbach RP (1995) Reduction of substituted nitrobenzenes by Fe(II) in aqueous mineral suspensions. Environ Sci Technol 29:2396-2404 Klint M, Arvin E, Jensen BK (1993) Degradation of the pesticides mecoprop and atrazine in unpolluted sandy aquifers. J Environ Qual 22:262-266 Kolpin DW, Barbash JE, Gilliom RJ (1998a) Occurrence of pesticides in shallow groundwater of the United States: Initial results from the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Environ Sci Technol 32:558-566 Kolpin DW, Kalkhoff SJ, Goolsby DA, Sneck-Fahrer DA, Thurman EM (1997) Occurrence of selected herbicides and herbicide degradation products in Iowa’s ground water, 1995. Ground Water 35:679-688
60
Kolpin DW, Thurman EM, Goolsby DA (1996) Occurrence of selected pesticides and their metabolites in near-surface aquifers of the Midwestern United States. Environ Sci Technol 30:335-340 Kolpin DW, Thurman EM, Linhart SM (1998b) The environmental occurrence of herbicides: The importance of degradates in ground water. Arch Environ Contam 35:385-390 Kuhlmann B, Kaczmarczyk B, Schöttler U (1995) Behaviour of phenoxyacetic acids during underground passage with different redox zones. Intern J Environ Anal Chem 58:199-205 Kuhn EP, Zeyer J, Eicher P, Schwarzenbach RP (1988) Anaerobic degradation of alkylated benzenes in denitrifying aquifer columns. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:490-496 Larsen L, Sørensen SR, Aamand J (2000a) Mecoprop, isoproturon, and atrazine in and above a sandy aquifer: Vertical distribution of mineralization potential. Environ Sci Technol 34:2426-2430 Larsen L, Aamand J (2000). Degradation of herbicides in two sandy aquifers under different redox conditions. Chemosphere, accepted Larsen L, Aamand J, Jørgensen C (2000b) Mineralization of four herbicides in a ground water-fed wetland area. J Environ Qual, accepted Lerch RN, Thurman EM, Blanchard PE (1999) Hydroxyatrazine in soils and sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2161-2168 Liu S, Yen ST, Kolpin DW (1996) Pesticides in ground water: Do atrazine metabolites matter? Water Resour Bull 32:845-853 Lovley DR, Chapelle FH (1995) Deep subsurface microbial processes. Rev Geophys 33:365-381 Lovley DR, Lonergan DJ (1990) Anaerobic oxidation of toluene, phenol, and p-cresol by the dissimilatory iron-reducing organism, GS-15. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1858-1864
61
Lovley DR, Chapelle FH, Phillips EJP (1990) Fe(III)-reducing bacteria in deeply buried sediments of the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Geology 18:954-957 Ludvigsen L, Albrechtsen H-J, Heron G, Bjerg PL, Christensen TH (1998) Anaerobic microbial redox processes in a landfill leachate contaminated aquifer (Grindsted, Denmark). J Contam Hydrol 33:273-291 Macalady DL, Tratnyek PG, Grundl TJ (1986) Abiotic reduction reactions of anthro-pogenic organic chemicals in anaerobic systems: A critical review. J Contam Hydrol. 1:1-28 Mandelbaum RT, Wackett LP, Allen DL (1995) Isolation and characterization of a
Pseudomonas sp. that mineralizes the s-triazine herbicide atrazine. Appl Environ
Microbiol 61:1451-1457
Masaphy S, Henis Y, Levanon D (1996) Manganese-enhanced biotransformation of
atrazine by the white rod fungus Pleurotus pulmonarius and its correlation with
oxidation activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3587-3593
McMahon PB, Chapelle FH, Jagucki ML (1992) Atrazine mineralization potential of alluvial-aquifer sediments under aerobic conditions. Environ Sci Technol 26:1556-1559 Mersie W, Liu J, Seybold C, Tierney D (1998a) Extractability and degradation of atrazine in a submerged sediment. Weed Sci 46:480-486 Mersie W, Seybold C, Tierney D, McNamee C (1998b) Effect of temperature, disturbance and incubation time on release and degradation of atrazine in water columns over two types of sediments. Chemosphere 36:1867-1881 Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Goolsby DA (1996) Cyanazine, atrazine, and their metabolites as geochemical indicators of contaminant transport in the Mississippi river. In: Meyer MT, Thurman EM (eds.) Herbicide metabolites in surface water and groundwater. ACS Symposium Series 630, American Chemical Society, Washington Mirgain I, Green G, Monteil H (1995) Biodegradation of the herbicide atrazine in groundwater under laboratory conditions. Environ Technol 16:967-976
62
Mudd PJ, Hance RJ, Wright SJL (1983) The persistence and metabolism of isoproturon in soil. Weed Res 23:239-246 Novick NJ, Mukherjee R, Alexander M (1986) Metabolism of alachlor and propachlor in suspensions of pretreated soils and in samples from ground water aquifers. J Agric Food Chem 34:721-725 Papiernik SK, Spalding RF (1998) Atrazine, deethylatrazine, and deisopropylatrazine persistence measured in groundwater in situ under low-oxygen conditions. J Agric Food Chem 46:749-754 Pedersen JK, Bjerg PL, Christensen TH (1991) Correlation of nitrate profiles with groundwater and sediment characteristics in a shallow sandy aquifer. J Hydrol 124:263-277 Phelps TJ, Murphy EM, Pfiffner SM, White DC (1994) Comparison between geo-chemical and biological estimates of subsurface microbial activity. Microb Ecol 28:335-349 Phelps TJ, Raione EG, White DC, Fliermans CB (1989) Microbial activities in deep subsurface environments. Geomicrobiol J 7:79-91 Phillips PJ, Eckhardt DAV, Thurman EM, Terracciano SA (1999) Ratios of metolachlor to its metabolites in ground water, tile-drain discharge, and surface water in selected areas of New York State. In: Morganwalp DW, Buxton HT (eds.) USGS Toxic Substances Hydrology Program – Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Chaleston, SC. March 8-12, 1999, vol. 2, Contamination of hydrologic systems and related ecosystems. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Reports 99-4018B Pinsky P, Lorber M, Johnson K, Kross B, Burmeister L, Wilkins A, Hallberg G (1997) A study of the temporal variability of atrazine in private well water. Part II: Analysis of data. Environ Monit Assess 47:197-221 Pieuchot M, Perrin-Ganier C, Portal J-M, Schiavon M (1996) Study on the mineralization and degradation of isoproturon in three soils. Chemosphere 33:467-478 Postma D, Boesen C, Kristiansen H, Larsen F (1991) Nitrate reduction in an unconfined sandy aquifer: Water chemistry, reduction processes, and geochemical modeling. Water Resour Res 27:2027-2045
63
Postma D, Jakobsen R (1996) Redox zonation: Equilibrium constraints on the Fe(III)/SO4-reduction interface. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:3169-3175 Pothuluri JV, Moorman TB, Obenhuber DC, Wauchope RD (1990) Aerobic and anaerobic degradation of alachlor in samples from a surface-to- groundwater profile. J Environ Qual 19:525-530 Potter TL, Carpenter TL (1995) Occurrence of alachlor environmental degradation products in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 29:1557-1563 Radosevich M, Crawford JJ, Traine SJ, Oh K-H, Tuovinen OH (1993) Biodegradation of atrazine and alachlor in subsurface sediments. In: Sorption and degradation of pesticides and organic chemicals in soil, SSSA Special Publications no. 32 Radosevich M, Traina SJ, Tuovinen OH (1996) Biodegradation of atrazine in surface soils and subsurface sediments collected from an agricultural research farm. Biodegra-dation 7:137-149 Radosevich M, Traina SJ, Tuovinen OH (1997) Atrazine mineralization in laboratory-aged soil microcosms inoculated with s-triazine-degrading bacteria. J Environ Qual 26:206-214 Romero E, Sánchez-Rasero F, Peña A, de la Colina C, Dios G (1996) Bentazone leaching in Spanish soils. Pestic Sci 47:7-15 Roy WR, Krapac IG (1994) Adsorption and desorption of atrazine and deethylatrazine by low organic carbon geologic materials. J Environ Qual 23:549-556 Rügge K, Bjerg PL, Mosbæk H, Christensen TH (1999) Fate of MCPP and atrazine in an anaerobic landfill leachate plume (Grindsted, Denmark). Water Res 33:2455-2458 Rügge K, Hofstetter TB, Haderlein SB; Bjerg PL, Knudsen S, Zraunig C, Mosbæk H, Christensen TH (1998) Characterization of predominant reductants in an anaerobic leachate-contaminated aquifer by nitroaromatic probe compounds. Environ Sci Technol 32:23-31 Scheunert I (1992) Transformation and degradation of pesticides in soil. In: Ebing W (ed.) Terrestrial behavior of pesticides. Chemistry of plant protection 8, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
64
Skipper HD, Gilmour CM, Furtick WR (1967) Microbial versus chemical degradation of atrazine in soils. Soil Sci Soc Amer Proc 31:653-656 Skipper HD, Wollum AG, Turco RF, Wolf DC (1996) Microbiological aspects of environmental fate studies of pesticides. Weed Technol 10:174-190 Smelt JH, van der Peppel-Groen AE, Leistra M (1995) Transformation of aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone in four water-saturated sandy subsoils. Pestic Sci 44:323-334 Smith AE (1989) Degradation, fate, and persistence of phenoxyalkanoic acid herbi-cides in soil. Rev Weed Sci 4:1-24 Sorenson BA, Koskinen WC, Buhler DD, Wyse DL, Lueschen WE, Jorgenson MD (1995) Fate of 14C-atrazine in a silt loam soil. Intern J Environ Anal Chem 61:1-10 Sorenson BA, Koskinen WC, Buhler DD, Wyse DL, Lueschen WE, Jorgenson MD (1993) Formation and movement of 14C-atrazine degradation products in a clay loam soil in the field. Weed Sci 42:618-624 Sorenson BA, Wyse DL, Koskinen WC, Buhler DD, Lueschen WE, Jorgenson MD (1993) Formation and movement of 14C-atrazine degradation products in a sandy loam soil under field conditions. Weed Sci 41:239-245 Stevens TO, Crawford RL, Crawford DL (1991) Selection and isolation of bacteria capable of degrading dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol). Biodegradation 2:1-13. Stolpe NB, Shea PJ (1995) Alachlor and atrazine degradation in a Nebraska soil and underlying sediments. Soil Sci 160:359-370 Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York Stuyfzand PJ (1998) Fate of pollutants during artificial recharge and bank filtration in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the third international symposium on artificial recharge of groundwater – TISAR 98, September 21-25. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 119-125
65
Swindoll CM, Aelion CM, Dobbins DC, Jiang O, Long SC, Pfaender FK (1988a) Aerobic biodegradation of natural and xenobiotic organic compounds by subsurface microbial communities. Environ Toxicol Chem 7:291-299 Swindoll CM, Aelion CM, Pfaender FK (1988b) Influence of inorganic and organic nutrients on aerobic biodegradation and on the adaptation response of subsurface microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:212-217 Trudell MR, Gillham RW, Cherry JA (1986) An in-situ study of the occurrence and rate of denitrification in a shallow unconfined sand aquifer. J Hydrol 83:251-268 Toräng L, Albrechtsen H-J, Nyholm N (2000) Biodegradation kinetics at low concentrations (<1µg/L) for aquifer pesticide contaminants. In: Bjerg, PL, Engesgaard P, Krom, TD (eds.) Groundwater 2000. Proceedings of the International Conference on Groundwater Research, Copenhagen, 6-8 June. Balkema, Rotterdam Tuxen, N., Tüchsen, P.L., Rügge, K., Albrechtsen, H.-J. & Bjerg, P.L. (2000) The fate of seven pesticides in an aerobic aquifer studied in column experiments. Chemosphere 41: 1485-1494 van der Kooij D, Visser A, Hijnen WAM (1982) Determining the concentration of easily assimilable organic carbon in drinking water. J Am Water Works Assoc 74:540-545 van der Pas LJT, Leistra M, Boesten JJTI (1998) Rate of transformation of atrazine and bentazone in water-saturated sandy subsoils. Pestic Sci 53:223-232 Vanderheyen V, Debongnie P, Pussemier L (1997) Accelerated degradation and mineralization of atrazine in surface and subsurface soil materials. Pestic Sci 49:237-242 Verloop A (1972) Fate of the herbicide dichlobenil in plants and soil in relation to its biological activity. Residue Rev 43:55-103 Vroumsia T, Steiman R, Seigle-Murandi F, Benoit-Guyod J-L, Khadrani A (1996) Biodegradation of three substituted phenylurea herbicides (chlortuluron, diuron, and isoproturon) by soil fungi. A comparative study. Chemosphere 33:2045-2056
66
Wedemeyer G (1967) Dechlorination of 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane by Aerobacter aerogenes. I. Metabolic products. Appl Microbiol 15:569-574 Widmer SK, Spalding RF (1995) A natural gradient transport study of selected herbicides. J Environ Qual 24:445-453 Wolfe NL, Macalady DL (1992) New perspectives in aquatic redox chemistry: Abiotic transformations of pollutants in groundwater and sediments. J Contam Hydrol 9:17-34 Yanze-Kontchou C, Gschwind N (1994) Mineralization of the herbicide atrazine as a carbon source by a Pseudomonas strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:4297-4302 Young LY, Frazer AC (1987) The fate of lignin and lignin-derived compounds in anaerobic environments. Geomicrobiol J 5:261-293 Zoro JA, Hunter JM, Eglinton G, Ware GC (1974) Degradation of p,p’-DDT in reducing environments. Nature 247:235-237
67
Top Related