7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
1/66
PREDICTION OF MINERALOGY OF SOME SOILS OF GANGES
FLOODPLAIN UNDER DIFFERENT CROPPING PATTERNS
HUMAIRA HASANStudent ID: 081321
Session: 2010-11
______________________________________
Soil Science Discipline
Khulna University
Khulna
April, 2012
- 1 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
2/66
PREDICTION OF MINERALOGY OF SOME SOILS OF GANGES
FLOODPLAIN UNDER DIFFERENT CROPPING PATTERNS
Course Title: Project Thesis
Course No: SS-4106
This project thesis paper has been prepared and submitted to Soil Science
Discipline, Khulna University, for the partial fulfillment of four years
professional B. Sc. (Hons) degree in Soil Science.
Submitted By
________________________________HUMAIRA HASAN
Student ID: 081321
Session: 2010-11
- 2 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
3/66
PREDICTION OF MINERALOGY OF SOME SOILS OF GANGES
FLOODPLAIN UNDER DIFFERENT CROPPING PATTERNS
Approved As To Style And Content By
...
KHANDAKAR QUDRATA KIBRIA
Associate ProfessorHead & Chairman of Examination Committee
Soil Science DisciplineKhulna University, Khulna
Bangladesh
___________________________
Soil Science Discipline
Khulna University
Khulna
April, 2012
- 3 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
4/66
DECLARATION
This project thesis paper is entirely the candidates own
investigation.
Supervisor
Md. Sadiqul Amin
Assistant ProfessorSoil Science Discipline
Khulna University, Khulna
Candidate
HUMAIRA HASAN
Student ID: 081321
_______________________________________
Soil Science Discipline
Khulna University
Khulna
April, 2012
- 4 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
5/66
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
At first I wish to express all my devotion and reverence to almighty Allah, who has
enable me to complete the thesis paper for the fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of
Science in Soil Science.
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude, sincere appreciation and profound
regards to Md. Sadiqul Amin, Assistant professor, Soil Science Discipline, Khulna
University, under whose careful supervision and scholastic guidance this thesis has
been conducted.
I am sincerely thankful to Khandakar Qudrata Kibria, Associate professor and
Head and Chairman of the Examination Committee, Soil Science Discipline,
University of Khulna for providing all possible facilities during the course of this
thesis paper and all other teachers of Soil Science Discipline for their cordial co-
operation at different stages for accomplishing this study.
I convey my respect and gratefulness to Md. Sanaul Islam,Associate professor, Soil
Science Discipline, University of Khulna for his cordial co-operation during this
study.
Special appreciation goes to my friend Falguni Akter for her excellent co-operationduring this study.
I am also thankful to my senior Sobuj Ahmed and junior Ali Reza, for their cordial
co-operation during my work.
Finally, I respectfully remember my parents and my younger sister for their support
for my higher education and without whose blessings this work would not have been
possible.
April, 2012. The
Author
- 5 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
6/66
DEDICATION
To my beloved family
- 6 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
7/66
CONTENT
Titles Page No.
CONTENT I
LIST OF TABLES IV
LIST OF FIGURES V
Chapter one: Introduction
1. Introduction 1
Chapter two: Literature review
2. Literature review
2.1. Primary soil minerals2.2. Secondary soil minerals
2.3. Formation of clay minerals
2.3.1. Formation of Vermiculite
2.3.1.1. Release of Potassium
2.3.1.2. Oxidation of Iron
2.3.1.3. Hydroxyl Orientation
2.3.2. Formation of Smectite
2.3.2.1. Transformation from Mica
2.3.2.1.1. Environment that promote thetransformation of mica
2.3.2.2. Transformation from Chlorite
2.3.2.3. Formation from Solution
2.3.3. Formation of Kaolinite
2.3.3.1. Equilibrium environment and conditions forsynthesis of Kaolinite
2.3.3.2. Kaolinite formation from Hydroxy-AlInterlayered Montmorillonite
2.4. Structure of clays minerals
2.4.1. The 1:1 Type Minerals
3
56
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
13
14
17
- 7 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
8/66
Titles Page No.
2.4.1.1. Kaolinite
2.4.1.2. Halloysite
2.4.2. The 2:1 type Minerals
2.4.2.1. Smectite (Montmorillonite)
2.4.2.2. Vermiculite
2.4.2.3. Mica
2.4.2.4. Illite
2.5.2.5. Chlorites
2.4.3. Interstratified Clay Minerals
2.4.3.1. Montmorillonite-Vermiculite-ChloriteIntergrade
2.4.3.2. Swelling 2:1 to 2:2 intergrades
2.5. Soil mineral weathering sequences
2.6. Pridiction of clay mineralogy
2.7. Ganges Floodplain soils of Bangladesh
2.8. The agricultural landuse of Ganges Floodplain soils
2.9. Clay mineralogy of the soils of Bangladesh
17
19
20
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
27
28
35
35
36
36
Chapter three: Materials and Methods
3. Materials And Methods
3.1. Study area
3.2. Collection of soil samples
3.3. Processing of soil samples
3.4. Soil analyses
3.4.1. Particle size analysis3.4.2. pH
3.4.3. ECe
3.4.4. Organic carbon
41
41
42
42
42
4242
42
42
- 8 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
9/66
Titles Page No.
3.4.5. Cation exchange capacity
3.4.6. Exchangeable K+
3.4.7. Water soluble K+
3.4.8.Water soluble Mg2+
42
43
43
43
Chapter four: Results and Discussion
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Physical Characteristics
4.2. Chemical Characteristics
4.2.1. pH
4.2.3. CEC
4.2.4. K+ content
4.2.5. Mg2+ content
4.2.6. Organic C and humus
4.3. Prediction of clay minerals
4.4. Weathering stability of clay minerals
44
44
44
44
44
44
46
46
46
46
Chapter five: Summary and conclusion 49
Chapter six: References 50
- 9 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
10/66
LIST OF TABLES
Titles Page No.
Table 2.1 Common primary mineral of soil 6
Table 2.2 Common secondary Minerals in Soils 7
Table 2.3 Types of minerals as indicators for relative degree of soildevelopment (the higher the number, the higher the degreeof development
30
Table 2.4 The typical ratio of CEC to clay for some classes of claymineralogy
35
Table 3.1 General information of sampling sites 41
Table 4.1 Different properties of studied soils 45
Table 4.2 The clay mineralogy of the soil samples 46
Table 4.3 Pedological indices for studied soil samples 47
Table 4.4 Pedological indices of different clay minerals underequilibrium condition
47
- 10 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
11/66
LISTS OF FIGURES
Titles Page No.
Fig 2.1 General conditions for the formation of the various layersilicate clays and oxides of iron and aluminum
8
Fig 2.2 Composition of solutions equilibrated withmontmorillonites
12
Fig 2.3 Tetrahedron, octahedron and classification of silicatemineral
16
Fig 2.4 Models of a 1:1 layer structure 17
Fig 2.5 Schematic structure of Kaolinite 18
Fig 2.6 Schematic structure of Halloysite 19
Fig 2.7 Models of a 2:1 layer structure 20
Fig 2.8 Schematic structure of montmorillonite 21
Fig 2.9 Schematic structure Vermiculite 22
Fig 2.10 Schematic structure of Mica 24
Fig 2.11 Schematic structure of Chlorite 26
Fig 2.12 Mineral stability sequence. Stability of minerals 29
Fig 2.13 Relative solubility of a few clay minerals 32
Fig 2.14 Relative solubility of selected primary and secondaryminerals at pH 7.0
34
Fig 2.15 A clay mineralogical map of Bangladesh soils 40
- 11 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
12/66
1. Introduction
Bangladesh is the largest deltaic floodplain in the world with a total area of 147570
km2 of which 88892 km2 is occupied by major rivers and estuaries. The great delta is
flat throughout and sketches from near the foothills of the Himalayas Mountain in thenorth to a southern irregular deltaic coastline that faces the Bay of Bengal. The major
portion of the Bengal basin of the Sindhu-Ganges depression lies in Bangladesh
(Saheed, 2010).
Bangladesh has a wide range of mineral soils developed in parent materials derived
from various sources ranging from fresh alluvial deposits of recent origin to strongly
weathered old alluvium and sedimentary rocks of tertiary formation. The soil formed
under varied topographic and hydrological conditions include poorly to very poorlydrained, strongly gleyed hydromorphic soils of the young alluvial lands on one hand
and well drained, red-brown, deeply weathered and leached latosolic soils of the
upland terrace and hills of the other. These soils are tentatively correlated in the
USDA Soil Taxonomy with Entisols, Inceptisols, Mollisols, Alfisols, Ultisols and
also may be with some Vertisols, encompassing about 512 soil series altogether. At
the sub-order level they are: Aquents, Psamments, Orthents, Aquepts, Ochrepts,
Umbrepts, Aquolls, Udalfs, Ustalfs, Udults and Ustults and also may be some Uderts.Among them the Aquepts are by far the most dominant soil covering about 60% of
the area (Saheed, 1985).
In Bangladesh, some data on both sand and clay mineralogy are available but they are
not adequate. After the reconnaissance soil survey, it has become apparent that for a
more efficient use of the soil survey information a further comprehensive grouping of
these soils series is needed at the family level. For this a systematic mineralogical
study is urgently required (Saheed, 1985). Recently formed delta and alluvial plains ofthe Ganges, Brahmaputra andMeghna rivers are the most extensive area of cropping
practices. Pedological indices for determination of the weathering stability of soil
mineral could be influenced by different type cropping pattern.
The objectives of this study is
To predict the mineralogy of some soils of Ganges floodplain of
Bangladesh under different cropping pattern.
To describe the weathering stability of the clay minerals.
- 12 -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmaputrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meghna_Riverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meghna_Riverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meghna_Riverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmaputra7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
13/66
2. Literature Review
The solid phase of soil is composed inorganic and organic materials. Of these the
inorganic materials, or minerals, predominate in virtually all soils except Histosols
(Essington, 2004). A mineral is a naturally occurring, inorganic, solid element orcompound with a definite chemical composition and a regular internal crystal
structure (Montgomery, 2000). Minerals are generally classified as primary minerals
and secondary minerals (Essington, 2004). A primary mineral is one that has not been
altered chemically since its deposition and crystallization from molten lava or magma.
Quartz and feldspar are common primary minerals in the soil. A secondary mineral is
one resulting from the weathering of a primary mineral; either by an alteration in the
structure or from reprecipitation of the products of weathering (dissolution) of aprimary mineral. Common secondary minerals in soils are the aluminosilicate or
phyllosilicate minerals such as kaolinite and montmorillonite, oxides such as gibbsite,
goethite, amorphous materials such as imogolite and allophane (Sparks, 1995). In soil,
a naturally occurring material composed primarily of fine-grained minerals (
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
14/66
The kind and amount of clay influence plant growth by affecting available water
capacity, water intake rate, aeration, leaching, erodibility etc. By slightly slowing the
rate of water movement, it can reduce the rate of nutrient loss through leaching. It also
determines the swelling capacity of the soil (Brady and Weil, 2002). Mineral
wreathing releases plant nutrients that are retained by other minerals through
adsorption, cation exchange, and precipitation. Clay content can be increase or
decrease in the soil. Up to a certain point, an increase in the amount of clay in the
subsoil is desirable. The amount of clay accumulation and its location in the profile
provide clues for the soil scientist about soil genesis. Irregular clay distribution as
related to depth may indicate lithologic discontinuities, especially if accompanied by
irregular sand distribution (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
According to Jenny (1941) soil formation depends upon some factors. These are
isolated as the climatic factor, the biotic factor, the topographic factor, the parent
material and the time factor (Churchman, 2000). The formation of clay minerals in
soils generally results from the combination and addition of ions and molecules from
the soil solution to the solid phase. Formerly, soil minerals were thought to form by
differential migration of ions into and out of existing silicate structures. The diffusion
of A13+ or Mg2+ out of the lattice was supposedly balanced by the inward diffusion of
other ions. Clay mineral formation occurs by ion substitution between soil solution
and an existing solid (Bhon et al., 1979). The synthesis of the clay minerals at
elevated temperatures and pressures from oxides and hydroxides and from various
minerals, particularly the feldspars, in the presence of acids and alkalies has been
studied in considerable detail. The environmental conditions favorable for the
formation of the clay minerals can be decided from the available data from synthesis
experiments (Grim, 1986). At low temperatures and pressures, acid conditions
apparently favor the formation of the kaolinite type of mineral, whereas alkaline
conditions favor the formation of smectite or mica, if potassium is the alkali metal and
if it is present in concentration above a certain level. The presence of magnesium
particularly favors the formation of montmorillonite. At temperatures somewhat
above about 350C and with moderate pressures, pyrophyllite forms in place of
kaolinite, with an excess Al2O3 forming boehmite. At more elevated temperatures and
pressures, other alumina phases develop. Mica can form under acid conditions, and
- 14 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
15/66
kaolinite or pyrophyllite can develop in the presence of an excess of K2O, depending
on the temperature, the amount of K2O and the Al2O3:SiO2 ratio (Grim, 1986).
2.1. Primary soil minerals
The mineral which has not been altered chemically since its deposition and
crystallization from molten lava is called primary mineral (Brady and Weil, 2002).
Most common primary minerals in soils are quartz and feldspar. Other primary
minerals that are found in soils in smaller quantities include pyroxenes, micas,
amphiboles and olivines. Primary minerals occur primarily in the sand and silt
fractions of soils but may be found in slightly weathered clay-sized fractions (Sparks,
1995). The most common primary minerals found in soil are presented in Table 2.1.
- 15 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
16/66
Table 2.1
Common primary mineral of soil
Name Chemical formula
Quartz SiO2
Muscovite KAl2 (AlSi3 O10) (OH)2
Biotite K(Mg, Fe)3(AlSi3 O10) (OH)2
Feldspar
Orthoclase
Microcline
Albite
KAlSi3O8KAISi3O8
NaAlSi3O8
Amphiboles
Tremolite Ca2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2
Pyroxenes
EnstatiteDiopside
Rhodonite
MgSiO3CaMg(Si2O6)
MnSiO3
Olivine (Mg, Fe)2SiO4
Epidote Ca2(Al, Fe)3Si3 O12(OH)
Tourmaline (Na, Ca) (Al, Fe3+, Li, Mg)3 Al6 (BO3)3 (Si6O18) (OH)4
Zircon ZrSiO4
Rutile TiO2
Source: Sparks, 1995
2.2. Secondary soil minerals
The secondary mineral is one resulting from the weathering of a primary mineral
(Table 2.2) either by an alteration in the structure or from reprecipitation of the
products of weathering (dissolution) of a primary mineral. Common secondary
minerals in soils are the aluminosilicate minerals such as kaolinite and
montmorillonite, oxides such as gibbsite, goethite, and birnessite, amorphous
materials such as imogolite and allophane, and sulfur and carbonate minerals. The
secondary minerals are primarily found in the clay fraction of the soil but can also be
found in the silt fraction (Sparks, 1995).
- 16 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
17/66
Table 2.2
Common secondary Minerals in Soils
Name Chemical formula
Clay minerals
KaoliniteMontmorillonite
Vermiculite
Chlorite
Si4Al4O10( OH)8MX (Al, Fe2+, Mg)4Si8O20 (OH)4 [M = interlayer metal
cation]
(Al, Mg, Fe3+)4 (Si, Al)8O20(OH)4[M Al (OH)6](Al, Mg)4(Si, Al)8 O20(OH, F)4
Allophane Si3Al4O12 . nH2O
Imogolite Si2Al4O10 . 5H2O
Goethite FeOOH
Hematite -Fe2O3
Maghemite -Fe2O3
Ferrihydrite Fe10O15 . 9H2O
Bohemite -AlOOH
Gibbsite Al (OH)3
Pyrolusite -MnO2
Gypsum CaSO4 . 2H2O
Source: Sparks, 1995
2.3. Formation of clay minerals
The silicate clays are developed from the weathering of a wide variety of minerals by
at least two distinct processes: (1) a slight physical and chemical alteration of certain
primary minerals, and (2) a decomposition of primary minerals with the subsequent
recrystallization of certain of their products into the silicate clays (Brady and Weil,
2002). The simplified framework of mineral weathering is presented in Fig. 2.1.
- 17 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
18/66
Fig. 2.1 General conditions for the formation of the various layer silicate clays and oxides of iron andaluminum (Brady and Weil, 2002)
2.3.1. Formation of Vermiculite
Vermiculites will not form from solidification of a magma, and it is most universally
assumed that the mineral can be formed only by alteration of a micaceous mineral.
Borchardt et al. (1966) showed that trioctahedral vermiculite pseudomorphs after
mica are common in many soils. Trioctahedral vermiculite in soils may be formed by
alteration of biotite,phlogopite, or chlorite either in the soil or in the parent material
(Johnson, 1964). The alteration of micas to vermiculites may be subdivided into
separate steps, orfactors affecting alteration: (i) release of K, (ii) oxidation of Fe2+and
- 18 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
19/66
(iii) OH orientation. These reactions may be mitigated by the presence of organic
acids (Robert et al., 1979).
2.3.1.1. Release of Potassium
The rate of release of K from interlayer positions in mica and replacement by other
ions may be considered a diffusion process, with diffusion of K+ out and diffusion of
the counter ion to the vacated spot (Chute and Quirk, 1967). A biotite disk, when
placed in an appropriate salt solution, will alter so that in a short time a vermiculite
halo will appear to encircle the biotite core. Alteration proceeds parallel to the X and
Y directions, with little apparent alteration parallel to the Z direction in the crystal.
Potassium may diffuse from all interlayers, with mica going directly to vermiculite. In
other cases K may diffuse along a specific (001) plans but not from adjacent (001)planes. The latter causes a wedge-shaped K+ depleted zone in the mica (Rich, 1964).
This process results in the widely reported (Bassett, 1959; Roux et al., 1963) mica-
vermiculite interstratified minerals. Very small amounts of K in solution will prevent
the replacement of K+ by such cations as Mg2+. The reaction biotite to vermiculite will
proceed only when leaching is effective removes K (Bassett, 1959).
2.3.1.2. Oxidation of Iron
Most of the iron in biotite is in the reduced state, and most of the iron trioctahedral
vermiculite is in the oxidized state (Weaver and Pollard, 1973). Some of the
octahedralposition are lost during the alteration process and some Al migratesfrom
tetrahedral sites to octahedral sites (Vicente et al., 1977), resulting in a larger
proportion of more stable dioctahedrel sites in the weathering product. This increase
in number of dioctahedrel sites also causes an increase in the rotation of tetrahedral
and thus decreases the length of the b axis (Farmeret al., 1971). Divalent iron may be
dissolved and lost via the soil solution or oxidation and precipitation. The
simultaneous oxidation and expulsion of iron from a mica may result in the formation
of either hydroxy-Fe vermiculite or a crystalline external phase of-FeOOH. Under
acidic conditions the oxidation of Fe is enhanced by a need by a decrease in total
charge of the octahedral sheet through loss of octahedral Fe and Mg; the decrease in
surface charge is minimal and vermiculite is formed (Farmeret al., 1971).
2.3.1.3. Hydroxyl Orientation
- 19 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
20/66
In trioctahedral micas OH- ions sit in a hole above three divalent (Fe 2+ or Mg2+) ions.
This causes a uniform charge distribution below the OH and repels the H portion of
the OH. In trioctahedral micas the H end of the OH is pointed directly toward the K.
In dioctahedral micas the cations in the octahedral sheet are primarily trivalent (Al3+),
with only two-thirds of the available octahedral positions occupied; each OH sits
above two cations and a structure vacancy. The octahedral cations orient the OH- ion
so that the H- ion points in the general direction of the interlayer K+, but is tilted
toward the vacant octahedral site. Thus, in trioctahedral micas the K+ sits in a volume
strongly affected by the repulsive forces (polarity) of the H portion of the OH (Dixon
and Weed, 1989).
2.3.2. Formation of Smectite
In the environment smectite can form by the transformation of mica, chlorite and
solution.
2.3.2.1. Transformation from Mica
Similarities in their sheet structures have long led to the conclusion that smectites
could be derived from micas by depotassication (Crawford et al., 1983). Smectites
weathered from micas are likely to be tetrahedrally substituted, approaching the
beidellite end member in chemical composition (Ozkan and Ross, 1979).
Trioctahedral micas are likely to produce unstable trioctahedral smectites that tend to
lose Mg and Fe from the octahedral sheet during further weathering. The term
transformation smectite has been proposed for smectites derived from micaceous
minerals (Robert, 1973). The following equation describes the weathering of
phlogopite mica to saponite, a trioctahedral smectite: (Robert, 1973)
(Si3Al)(Mg3)O10(OH)2K + 0.5Si4+ + 0.25Ca2+
(Si 3.5Al0.5)(Mg3)O10(OH)2Ca0.25 + 0.5Al3+ + K+
The equation illustrates the essential changes necessary for smectite transformation
from a mica. They are (Komarneni et al., 1985)
1. Depotassication as in vermiculite formation
2. Dealumination of the tetrahedral sheet followed by
3. Silication of the tetrahedral sheet
- 20 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
21/66
Without these extensive changes, micas do not have the low-charge characteristics
necessary for them to exhibit the properties of smectites.
2.3.2.1. Environment that promote the transformation of mica
First, temperatures and pressures must be low enough to destabilize the tetrahedral Al
that distinguishes weatherable micas (Jackson, 1963). Second, the concentration of K
must be low, such as in rainwater and in soil solutions of heavily cropped soils. Third,
Si(OH)4 concentrations must be high as provided by mafic minerals with Si potentials
higher than that of smectite (Huang, 1966). Fourth, Al concentrations must be low, as
they are in soils with pHs above 6 or 7. Thus, soils with low K+ and Al3+ and high
Si(OH)4 and Ca2+ or Mg2+ activities and pH above 6.5 are likely to contain
transformation smectites. At a soil pH < 6, mica weathers to vermiculite, whichsubsequently tends to form kaolinite (Ismail, 1970).
2.3.2.2. Transformation from Chlorite
Mafic chlorite is highly unstable in most soils. It would he expected to lose its
hydroxide interlayer at pH levels < 6 and under severe leaching and oxidizing
conditions, thus forming a smectite that is, in turn, relatively unstable due to its
trioctahedral nature. These are not conditions that would be expected to preserve
smectite indefinitely. The laboratory weathering of trioctahedral, Fe-rich chlorite can
be accomplished in a saturated Br2 solution at 100C (Senkayi et al., 1981). The
reaction proceeds with the production of regularly interstratified chlorite-vermiculite
and chlorite-smectite intermediates occurring in the first 2d. Within 2 weeks, the
chlorite disappears entirely (Adams et al., 1971).
2.3.2.3. Formation from Solution
Smectites that precipitate directly from soil or matrix solutions may be calledneogenetic smectites. Vast regions of the world have simectitic soils formed primarily
in young glacial and alluvial materials, a fact suggesting that smectite neogenesis
occurs rapidly if it occurs at all (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
2.3.3. Formation of Kaolinite
Formation of kaolinite depends upon the Equilibrium environment and conditions.
There are also possibilities to form kaolinite from Hydroxy-Al Interlayered
Montmorillonite.
- 21 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
22/66
2.3.3.1. Equilibrium environment and conditions for synthesis of Kaolinite
Formation of kaolinite in the presence of smectite at 25C provides an example of
mineral precipitation under conditions much like those in field soils. Several samples
of three reference smectites were acidified with HCl and adjusted with solutions of Siand Al to provide a range of conditions prior to incubation (Kittrick, 1970). Analyses
were made periodically to determine solution compositions. After 3 to 4 year, the
formation of kaolinitic was shown in some samples. A stability line for kaolinite
derived from data obtained at equilibrium and an equation for the precipitation of
kaolinite are shown in Fig. 2.2.
Fig. 2.2. Composition of solutions equilibrated with montmorillonites from Belle Fourche, South
Dakota ( ); Otay, California (); and Aberdeen, Mississippi () after 3 to 4 year of equilibration.
Solid symbols indicate kaolinite formation, and open symbols indicate no detectable kaolinite. Size of
the symbols indicates analysis precision. Arrows indicate the direction of sample equilibration as
shown by previous analyses. Dashed solubility lines indicate metastable area (Kittrick, 1970)
.
A stability line for kaolinite is drawn from Eq. [2.1] for the precipitation of kaolinite
from Al3+ and H4SiO4
2Al3+ + 2H4SiO4 + H2O 6H+ + Si2Al2O5(OH)4(kaolinitic) . [2.1]
The equilibrium constant, K, for the reaction is
- 22 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
23/66
An activity of unity is assumed for kaolinite and H2O. Taking log on both sides. [Eq.
2.2]
log K = -6pH 2log Al3+ - 2log H4Sio4 .. [2.2]
Dividing by 2 and rearranging gives [Eq.2.3]
log Al3+ + 3pH = -log H4Sio4 log K [2.3]
The slope of the kaolinite stability line in fig. 2.2 is -1, and the intercept is -1/2 log K
from Eq. [2.3]. The intercept is based on the sample with the lowest log H 4SiO4-
thepoint ( ) at the far left in fig. 2.2 The last analysis of this sample had a pH of 3.47,
log H4SiO4 of -3.53 (assuming all dissolved Si as H4SiO4) and log Al3+ of -3.78
(corrected from a molar concentration of log Al = -3.59 for Al equilibria and
influence of ionic strength). Thus, employing Eq. [2.2] gives
log K = -6(3.47) 2(-3.78) 2(-3.53)
log K = -6.20
From Eq. [2.3] the intercept of the kaolinite stability line in fig. 2.2 is - 1/2 log K, or
3.10. The stability line in fig. 2.2 represents the boundary between the areas of
supersaturation (above) and undersaturation (below) for kaolinite. Kaolinite was
detected by X-ray diffraction analysis only in solutions saturated or supersaturated
with respect to kaolinite (solid data points). None of the data points indicated
supersaturation with respect to gibbsite. All of the undersaturated solutions and all of
the supersaturated solutions, except for one unexplained example, appear to be
progressing toward the kaolinite stability line (Dixon and Weed, 1989). By
calculating the free energy of formation, G, equivalent to the stability line for the
kaolinite derived above, comparison can be made with the stability of other kaolinite
subgroup minerals from Eq. [2.1]
Gr = G (kaolinite) - 2G3+Al - 2G H4Sio4 - GH2O . [2.4]
where, Gr is the standard free energy of reaction. And = Gr = - RT In K = 1.364
pK, or 35.4 kJ mol
-1
at 25C. Hence G (kaolinite) = -3.783 MJ mol
-1
.
- 23 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
24/66
The G of -3.783 MJ mol-1 suggests a slightly greater stability for the synthetic
kaolinite than does the G of -3.78 1 MJ mol-1 for a kaolinitic of reportedly near
maximum crystallinity. The G values for kaolin precipitated in soils and sediments
at 25C probably will range from 3.760 MJmol-1 for halloysite to the initial
precipitation level of -3.783 MJ mol-1 for kaolinite (Kittrick, 1970)
2.3.3.2. Kaolinite formation from Hydroxy-Al Interlayered Montmorillonite
Kaolinite formation has been induced by hydrothermal treatment of hydroxy-Al
interlayered montmorillonite at 220 C. The kaolinite was expanded to approximately
0.85 nm during the first few days of reaction. After 14d of hydrothermal treatment or
heating at 300 C following hydrothermal treatment, the kaolinite collapsed to 0.72
nm. The early product had a spacing suggestive of halloysite or a halloysite-kaoliniteinterstratified mixture (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
Efforts to synthesize kaolinite from smectite have produced kaolinite-smectite
interstratified. Both tetrahedral and octahedral sheets of smectite were ought to
dissolve, releasing H4SiO4 for reaction with Al3+ to form kaolinite according to the
following equations (2.5 and 2.6): Tetrahedral and octahedral sheets of smectite
dissolve:
(Al,Fe,Mg)2Si4O10(OH)2 + 4H2O + 6H+ 2(Al,Fe,Mg)3+ + 4 H4SiO4 [2.5]
H4SiO4 and Al3+ react to form kaolinite
2H4SiO4 + 2Al3+ + H2O Al2Si2O5(OH)4 + 6H+ . [2.6]
The net reaction gives the Eq.2.7
(Al,Fe,Mg)2Si4O10(OH)2 + m Al3+ + 6H2O
Al2Si2O5(OH)4 + 6H
+
+ aFe
3+
+ bMg
2+
.. [2.7]Where m = 2 + a + b.
The addition of Al3+ contributed to the progress of the reaction and to kaolinite
production to a limit where smectite appeared to be stabilized. No amorphous silica
product was formed, and the pH declined during the progress of the reaction as
suggested by the equations. Some unreacted smectite remained, and some discrete
kaolinite was formed (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
2.4. Structure of clays minerals
- 24 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
25/66
The term clay mineral is commonly used to refer to minerals with the sheet silicate
structures of the phyllosilicates. Phyllosilicates are one of many subclasses of the
silicate mineral class (Fig. 2.3). The basic structural feature of all minerals in these
subclasses is the SiO4 tetrahedron linked by the sharing of three of four oxy anions to
form sheets with a pseudohexagonal network in the ab crystallographic plane. The
sheet has the composition (Si2O5)2-. The three shared O2- ions are termed basal O2- ions
while the fourth apical O2- is not shared with another SiO4 tetrahedron and may bond
to other structures. The tetrahedra are interconnected in sheet-like structures. These
sheets are commonly referred to as silica or tetrahedral sheets (Fig. 2.3). Cations in
each tetrahedral sheet are in fourfold coordination, i.e., each Si cation is bonded to
four O2- ions arranged in each tetrahedron. Aluminum may replace as many as half of
the Si, producing a formula composition such as (AlSi3O10)5- or (Al2Si2O10)6-. Minerals
in which tetrahedral sheets of silica dominate are often referred to as layer silicates
(Olson et al. 2000).
- 25 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
26/66
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
27/66
arranged around the positively charged cations in an octahedral pattern; one anion at
each corner of an octahedron surrounding a central cation. Adjacent octahedra share
anions to form a planar network referred to as an octahedral sheet (Schulze, 1989). In
the octahedral sheet, connections between each octahedron, M, to neighbouring
octahedra are made by sharing edges. The edge-shared octahedra form sheets of
hexagonal or pseudo-hexagonal symmetry (Fig. 2.3). Common tetrahedral cations are
Si4+, Al3+, and Fe3+. Octahedral cations are usually Al3+, Fe3+, Mg2+, and Fe2+, but other
cations, such as Li+, Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, V3+, Cr3+, and Ti4+ were identified.
Octahedra show two different topologies related to hydroxyl position, i.e., the cis- and
the trans-orientation (Fig. 2.3).
Phyllosilicates may be structurally classified into dioctahedral and trioctahedral types.This classification is based on the cation valence and configuration of the octahedral
site in two- or three-layer structures. There are two ways to fill an octahedral site,
depending on the cation valence. A divalent cation (Ca 2+, Mg2+) when placed into the
octahedral site produces a trioctahedral arrangement (Olson et al., 2000).
Phyllosilicates strongly influence chemical and physical properties of soils because of
their small particle size, high surface area, and cation exchange properties. Among the
phyllosilicate minerals important to soil development, the most common are discussedhere: mica, vermiculite, chlorite, smectite, interstratified minerals, kaolinite, and talc
and pyrophyllite. Depending on the arrangement of octahedral and tetrahedral sheets
the clay minerals can be grouped into 1:1, 2:1 and 2:1:1 type clay minerals (Olson et
al., 2000).
2.4.1. The 1:1 Type Minerals
The 1:1 layer structure consists of a unit made up of one octahedral and one
tetrahedral sheet, with the apical O2- ions of the tetrahedral sheets being shared with
(and part of) the octahedral sheet. There are three planes of anions (fig. 2.4). One
plane consistsof the basal O2 ions of the tetrahedral sheet, the second consists of O2
ions common toboth the tetrahedral and octahedral sheets plus OH- belonging to the
octahedral sheet,and the third consists only of OH- belonging to the octahedral sheet
(Dixon and Weed1989).
- 27 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
28/66
Fig. 2.4. Models of a 1:1 layer structure. Oa, Ob, and Ooct refer to tetrahedral apical, tetrahedral basal,and octahedral anionic position, respectively. M and T indicate the octahedral and tetrahedral cation,respectively (Brigatti et al., 2006).
The common 1:1 type clay minerals will be described.
2.4.1.1. Kaolinite
Kaolinite occurs commonly in soils, often as hexagonal crystals with an effectivediameter of 0.2 to 2 m. Hydrogen bonding between adjacent unit layers prevents
expansion (swelling) of the mineral beyond its basal spacing of 7.2 (Fig 2.5).
Surface area is limited to external surfaces and hence is relatively small, ranging from
10 to 20 m2/g. Kaolinite is coarse clay with low colloidal activity, including low
plasticity and cohesion, and low swelling and shrinkage (Bhon et al., 1979). Kaolinite
is dioctahedral and the layer is electrically neutral. Other kaolin minerals, dickite and
nacrite, have the same basic 0.7-nm unit layer thickness but stacking sequences of
layers along the c axis differ (Olson et al., 2000).
Fig. 2.5. Schematic structure of Kaolinite Al2Si2O5 (OH)4 (Bear, 1964)
- 28 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
29/66
The ideal unit formula for kaolinite [Al2Si2O5(OH)4] has an Si/Al ratio of 1 which
suggests little or no isomorphic substitution. Most of the 1 to 10 cmol kg -1 cation
exchange capacity of kaolinite has been attributed to dissociation of OH groups on
clay edges. However, if only one Si4+ of every 400 in the silica sheet were substituted
by Al3+, the net negative charge would be cmol kg -1. Chemical analysis of clay
systems is not sufficiently sensitive to prove or disprove this extent of isomorphic
substitution. Such limited substitution is not sufficient to alter the unit cell formula
given for kaolinite. The cation exchange capacity of kaolinite is highly pH-dependent
suggesting that isomorphic substitution is not the predominant source of charge (Bhon
et al., 1979).
Kaolinite in soils is both authigenic (formed in place) and allogenic (formedelsewhere). It can form from the weathering of primary and secondary minerals,
subsequent to the release of Si4+ and Al3+. In most soils, however, kaolinite is inherited
from the weathering of older sediments (Olson et al., 2000).
Kaolinite particles are often >1 m in size and have a platy or book-like appearance
when viewed with an electron microscope. Although not considered an expanding
clay mineral, kaolinite will swell with the intercalation of some small polar molecules
such as formamide, hydrazine or urea (Olson et al., 2000).
2.4.1.2. Halloysite
Halloysite is similar in structure to kaolinite except for a layer of water molecules that
is intercalated within the 1:1 layer. It differs in morphology from kaolinite in that it is
often tubular (Singh 1996). Fig 2.6 shows the schematic structure of Halloysite.
Halloysite has water molecules between each 1:1 layer and the ability to adsorb large
quantities of monovalent cations such as NH4+. Drying will cause the water molecules
to be removed and the clay layers to collapse together (Newman and Brown, 1966).
Halloysite is also characterized by a tubular morphology, whereas kaolinite, when
examined with microscopic techniques, has a platy structure (Sparks, 1995).
Halloysite is found primarily in soils of volcanic origin and typically weathers to
kaolinite. If not properly handled during sampling and analysis, it is difficult to
distinguish halloysite from kaolinite; once dehydrated, the layer spacing decreases to
close to that of kaolinite (Olson et al., 2000).
- 29 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
30/66
Fig. 2.6. Schematic structure of Halloysite Si4Al4O10(OH)8.4 H2O (Bear, 1964)
2.4.2. The 2:1 type Minerals
The 2:1 layer structure consists of two tetrahedral sheets bound to either side of an
octahedral sheet. There are four planes of anions (fig. 2.4). The outer two planes
consist of the basal oxygens of the two tetrahedral sheets, while the two inner planes
consist of oxygens common to the octahedral sheet and one of the tetrahedral sheets,
plus the hydroxyls of the octahedral sheet (Dixon and Weed, 1989). The common 2:1
type clay minerals will be discussed.
Fig. 2.7. Models of a 2:1 layer structure. Oa, Ob, and Ooct refer to tetrahedral apical, tetrahedral basal,and octahedral anionic position, respectively. M and T indicate the octahedral and tetrahedral cation,respectively(Brigatti et al., 2006)
2.4.2.1. Smectite (Montmorillonite)
- 30 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
31/66
The term smectite is a generic name for 2:1 clay minerals that swell or collapse easily
depending on their pressure potential, osmotic potential, and saturating cations
(Sumner, 2000). Smectites are 2:1 layer silicates with layer charge of 0.25 to 0.6 per
formula unit. Because of the relatively low layer charge, smectites are freely
expanding. The c-spacing varies with the exchangeable cation and the degree of
interlayer solvation. Complete drying yields a spacing of 9.6 , and full hydration can
swell the layer to distance of tens or even hundreds of Angstroms (Bhon et al., 1979).
Clay minerals in the smectite-saponite group are characterized by a layer charge of
0.2-0.6 per half-cell formula unit. The group includes the subgroups dioctahedral
smectites and trioctahedral saponites. The dioctahedral smectites are represented by
montmorillonite, beidellite, and nontronite. The ideal half-cell chemical formula for
montmorillonite is M0.33, H2OAl1.67 (Fe2+, Mg2+)0.33 Si4O10(OH)2, where M refers to a
metal cation in the interlayer space between sheets. The tetrahedral cations are Si 4+
and the octahedral cations are Al3+, Fe2+ and Mg2+ (Fig 2.8). One can calculate the
negative charge in the tetrahedral sheet as 0 and in the octahedral sheet as - 0.33.
Thus, the net negative charge is - 0.33 that is balanced by exchangeable cations
represented by M0.33. The other feature that characterizes montmorillonite is the
presence of water molecules in the interlayer space. This causes montmorillonite to
take on shrink-swell characteristics (Spark, 1995).
Fig. 2.8. Schematic structure of montmorillonite Nax(Al2-xMgx)Si4O10(OH)2 (Bear, 1964)
The major difference between montmorillonite and the other two dioctahedral
smectites, beidellite and nontronite is that isomorphous substitution in these minerals
occurs in die tetrahedral sheet (i.e., Al3+ Substitutes for Si4+) rather than in the
- 31 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
32/66
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
33/66
M is most often Mg2+. In ambient conditions, 6 water molecules, arranged in two
sheets, form an octahedron around each Mg2+. Vermiculites saturated with Ca2+ or
Mg2+ and equilibrated at 54% relative humidity expands to a lesser degree than
smectites, i.e., X-ray diffraction (XRD) d-spacing are about 1.4 nm rather than 1.7 nm
(Olson et al., 2000).
Isomorphic substitution in the tetrahedral sheet yields an excess negative charge of
1.3. Isomorphic substitution in the octahedral sheet yields an excess positive charge of
0.6. So the net charge is -0.7 per unit formula. The layer charge in vermiculite gives
rise to a cation exchange capacity of from 120 to 150 cmol kg-1, which is considerably
higher than the exchange capacity of montmorillonite. As with montmorillonite, the
cation exchange capacity is only slightly pH-dependent. Vermiculite swells less thanmontmorillonite because of its higher layer charge. The mineral is nonswelling (with
a c-spacing of 10 ) when saturated with K+ or NH4+ ions. Such ions are commonly
termed fixed and cannot be exchanged with ordinary salt solutions. Total surface
areas of vermiculite, when not K+ or NH4+ saturated, range from 600 to 800m2/g
(Bhon et al., 1979).
2.4.2.3. Mica
Micas occur in almost any geologic environment and are abundant in many rocks
including shales, slates, phyllites, schists, gneiss, granites, and in sediments derived
from these rocks. As clay minerals, they can be derived from preexisting micas by
mechanical fragmentation but may also form in situ. Micas are 2:1 phyllosilicates
having a charge imbalance that is satisfied by a tightly held, nonhydrated, interlayer
cation (Olson et al. 2000). The idealized end member micas are dioctahedral
muscovite- K2Al2,Si6Al4O20(OH)4, and its isomorphous analogue paragonite
Na2Al2,Si6Al4O20(OH)4, and trioctahedral biotite- K2Al2Si6 (Fe2+, Mg)6O20(OH)4 and
phlogopite- K2Al2,Si6Mg6O20(OH)4. A variety of additional ion substitutions, beyond
those indicated for the end members, such as Li for Mg, more Al for Si, F or O for
OH, and possibly OH for O, can occur in micas. Layer charge, represented equivalent
to K, in the end-members, decreases in some biotites because of substitution of Al for
Mg, or Fe3+ for Fe2+ in the trioctahedral layer. The layer charge is extremely high in
- 33 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
34/66
margarite-Ca2Na2Al2,Si6Al4O20(OH)4 which is representative of the brittle micas
(Bear, 1964).
Micas have an octahedral sheet sandwiched between two tetrahedral sheets (Fig.
2.10). One of the 4 tetrahedral sites typically contains Al3+
rather than Si4+
. Thisresults in excess negative charge per formula unit. The negative charge is balanced by
monovalent cations, usually K+, occupying interlayer sites between two
tetrahedraloctahedral- tetrahedral layers. The general formula is Mx(R(2+)3-y, R(3+)y) (Si4-
X,Alx)O10(OH)2 where M is usually K+ or Na+. Micas can be either dioctahedral or
trioctahedral. The mica group consists of many species because Fe2+ and Fe3+
substitute for Mg2+ and Al3+ in octahedral sheets and Na+ and Ca2+ may substitute for
K+
. Occasionally, Ba2+
, Rb2+
, Cs, Sr+
, or NH4+
also substitute for K+
, particularly inbiotite mica (Olson et al., 2000).
Fig. 2.10. Schematic structure of Mica K[Al2 (Si3Al)O10(OH)2] (Bear, 1964)
Although micas may be either dioctahedral or trioctahedral, isomorphic substitution in
the tetrahedral layer creates negative charge close to the unit layer surface. Thischarge strongly retains the K+ ion. Such interlayer K+ is so strongly adsorbed that it is
not exchanged in standard cation exchange capacity determinations. Thus despite the
relatively large layer charge (about -1 for many micas), the CEC is only 20 to 40 cmol
kg-1. Total surface area is about 70 to 120 m2/g and is restricted to external surfaces.
Micas are nonswelling and are only moderately plastic. So-called fixed K+ is released
slowly during weathering and is an indigenous source of K+ for many soils (Bhon et
al., 1979).
- 34 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
35/66
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
36/66
Chlorites are often referred to as 2:1:1 clays since they are 2:1 clays with a hydroxide
interlayer, either gibbsite-like [Al(OH)x] or brucite-like [Mg(OH)x] where x is
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
37/66
or (2) diagenesis. Similarly, Sawhney (1989) states that naturally occurring mixed
layer minerals form by
1. Hydrothermal alteration,
2. Weathering involving partial removal of interlayer K from mica or removal of a
hydroxide-interlayer from chlorite, or
3. Uptake of K and
4. Formation of a brucite-like or gibbsite-like interlayer in expanding layer silicates.
2.4.3.1. MontmorilloniteVermiculiteChlorite Intergrade
Precipitation of coatings of hydrous, positively charged sesquioxides on the negative
surfaces of layer silicates has long been recognized as a phenomenon characteristic of
soils, as has their fundamental influence on soil chemical properties such as phosphate
fixation. Precipitation of hydroxy-aluminum, hydroxy sesquioxides, and possibly
magnesium hydroxide as gibbsite-like (or brucite-like) structures in the interlayer
spaces of montmorillonite and vermiculite produces structures the properties of which
are intergradient between those of the expansible mineral and those of chlorite. Most
natural clay intergrades so far described have shown 14 diffraction spacing and
have been termed dioctahedral vermiculite, vermiculite, chlorite-like orchlorite, according to the end-member to which they are compared. The interlayers
are heterogeneous with respect to islands of the brucite-like structures or
gibbsitelike structures which are distributed in interlayer spaces otherwise filled
with water and exchangeable cations, as is characteristic of vermiculite or
montmorillonite. The cation exchange capacity is consequently decreased to the
extent of the positive charge of the nonreplaceable hydroxy cation interlayers. The
interlayer specific surface is also decreased. The interlayer space becomesincreasingly resistant to collapse by heating as hydroxy interlayers become more
extensive. The products have appropriately been designated as inter- gradient 2:1 to
2:2 layer silicates or intergradient montmorillonite-vermiculite-chlorite (Bear, 1964).
2.4.3.2. Swelling 2:1 to 2:2 intergrades
Swelling chlorite has been described as having one surface of the brucite-like layer
unattached to a silicate layer, the interlayer positions thus would be heterogeneous
with respect to brucite and water-cation layers, and the complex is a swelling 2:1 to
- 37 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
38/66
2:2 intergrades. A sharp 18 peak with Mg saturation and glycerol solvation, and a
greatly broadened 10 peak with K saturation and 500 C heating, characterize the
expanding montmorillonite-chlorite intergrade type of clay (Bear, 1964).
In alkaline soils of arid regions, montmorillonite is relatively stable to weathering andso has a high frequency distribution. Characteristically, it is partially interlayered. The
weathering mechanism by which swelling intergradient 2:1 to 2:2
montmorillonitechlorites is formed appears to arise from the swollen character of
montmorillonitewhen moist. The presence of abundant montmorillonite creates moist
conditions and,as a result, the clay in the soil is kept swollen to 20 to 40 spacing.
Intercalatedhydroxyaluminum sheets can attach to only one layer of montmorillonite
so long as the layers are widely separated. In a feldspar rich mantle, alkalinity andhydrolysisyield a plentiful supply of freshly precipitated aluminum hydroxide, which
has apositive charge when below pH 8.3. The (+) valence charges on the hydroxyl
sesquioxide inter- layer cations attach to (-) exchange sites. Laboratory syntheses also
have involved attachment of gibbsite interlayers to one surface while the
montmorillonite is in a swollen state. The cation exchange capacity was considerably
lowered by the introduction of hydroxyaluminum interlayers in synthetic preparations
(Bear, 1964).
2.5. Soil mineral weathering sequences
Soil mineral weathering has been studied for many decades; most of the available
information, however, is empirical in nature and cannot be used for quantitative
predictions. In this section some of the available empirical weathering sequences
along with the predictions based on thermodynamic data have discussed (Dixon and
Weed, 1989).
Although there are exceptions, minerals that are far removed from their formation
environment tend to be the least stable. Based on generalizations from accumulated
data, (Goldich, 1938) proposed a mineral stability sequence (Fig. 2.12) that supports
the above hypothesis, in which the least stable minerals (in an aqueous environment)
are the first to crystallize during cooling of magma, and the most stable minerals
crystallize last. Because weathering (in this case, essentially the rate of dissolution) is
highly dependent on the nature of the weathering environment, however, the main
drawback of this sequence is that it does not consider the weathering environment.
- 38 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
39/66
Furthermore, secondary minerals that are weathering products of the preexisting
minerals are not considered (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
Fig. 2.12. Mineral stability sequence. Stability of minerals increases as one proceeds towards quartz,and as a group, salic minerals (plagioclases, feldspars, etc.) are more stable than mafic minerals(olivine, augite, etc.) (Goldich, 1938)
Jenny (1941) considered soil development to be a function of five factors: parent
material, topography, biosphere, climate, and time. The resultant weathering therefore
was considered to be a function of these factors.
Jackson and Sherman (1953) related the relative degree of soil development to the
types of minerals present in the clay fraction (Table 2.4). The explicit assumption in
this sequential development is that there is a continuous leaching of the soil profile
with time. Although, in general, the sequence is applicable to all soils and can be used
to categorize the soils according to their degree of development, this sequence cannot
be used to determine the specific chemical environmental conditions needed to bring
about these changes, or whether a given soil under a specific weathering environment
will proceed through all stages.
- 39 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
40/66
Table 2.3
Types of minerals as indicators for relative degree of soil development (the higher the number, thehigher the degree of development
Relative degree of
soil development
Prominent minerals in soil clay fraction
1 Gypsum, and other soluble salts
2 Calcite, dolomite, and apatite
3 Olivine-hornblende minerals
4 Biotite, glauconite, ferromagnesian chlorite
5 Feldspars
6 Quartz
7 Muscovite-illite
8 Interstratified 2:1 layer silicates and vermiculite
9 Montmorillonites
10 Kaolinite and halloysite
11 Gibbsite and allophane
12 Hematite-goethite
13 Anatase-leucoxene
Source: Jackson and Sherman, 1953
Numerous other researchers have identified the weathering products of various rocksand minerals and have proposed empirical weathering sequences. In general, it is
recognized that the weathering of a mineral is affected by its composition, coefficients
of expansion, cleavage, and original defects in the crystals, hardness, and specific
surface. Additional external factors are the physical, biological, and chemical
(oxidation/reduction, hydration, hydrolysis, pH, chelation, cation exchange,
carbonation) conditions of the weathering environment (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
The rate of weathering of primary minerals (e.g., 80,000 and 8800 years) of mean
lifetime at 25C and pH 5 for 1-mm crystals of albite and enstatite, respectively, as
well as the rate of formation of crystalline clay minerals, is so slow that the bulk
mineralogy of any given soil is not expected to change considerably in the lifetime of
any given individual. Therefore, it is easy to analyze the sample mineralogically and
find the exact distribution of the minerals. In the case of trace elements or hazardous
elements, however, the type or sequence of mineral formation is very important
because it may control the concentrations of these elements in groundwaters (Dixonand Weed, 1989).
- 40 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
41/66
Thermodynamic data can be used to predict the formation and weathering of minerals,
and perhaps the sequence of mineral weathering, because the of a mineral is
dependent on the composition, crystallinity, nature of chemical bonds, etc., and
because the precise weathering environment can be quantified in terms of activities of
constituent ions (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
Most major soil minerals contain one or more elements in common. Rarely, if ever,
can these minerals all be in equilibrium with one another. Within the group competing
for common elements, individual minerals are usually stable (least soluble) over a
rather narrow range of solution compositions. Thus, it is possible to understand the
soil system over a small portion of its solution composition range by considering the
stabilities of only a few of its minerals (e.g., gibbsite, kaolinite, montmorillonites, andamorphous silica) (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
The use of thermodynamic data in making graphs to portray mineral weathering
sequences or stability sequences has been discussed by many authors (Garrels and
Christ, 1965). As an example, the following reaction describes the equilibrium
between kaolinite and its dissolved species:
Al2Si2O5(OH)4 + 6H+ 2Al3+ + 2H4SiO40 + H2O
Kaolinite and H2O have unit activity and thus can be ignored in the equilibrium
expression. The equilibrium constant (K) for the above reaction is therefore
log k = 2 log (Al3+) + 2 log (H4SiO40)- 6 log (H+) .. [2.8]
Simplifying, rearranging, and substituting the above equation (Eq. 2.8), eq.2.9 derived
log (Al3+) + 3pH = 3.4 log (H4SiO40) . [2.9]
This algebraic manipulation of the equilibrium constant (Eq. 2.9) permits a graphic
representation of this solubility reaction, as shown in fig. 2.13. Similarly, gibbsite,
amorphous silica, and montmorillonite solubilities are also plotted in fig. 2.13.
- 41 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
42/66
Fig. 2.13. Relative solubility of a few clay minerals. Solubility lines for Belle Fourche montmorilloniteassume equilibrium with hematite and Na as the exchangeable ion when log Na = -3. The data for SiO2(am) are from Kittrick (1969); for gibbsite, from Kittrick (1966a); for kaolinite, from Kittrick (1966b);and for Belle Fourche montmorillonite, from Kittrick (1970)
Fig. 2.13 is a two-dimensional graph with a two-ion parameter on the ordinate and a
single illustrative contour line. Three ion variables are shown in this graph, with pH
and pMg (-log Mg2+) fixed at selected levels of interest (pMg 3.7 is the average
content of natural waters) and pFe3+ assumed to be fixed by hematite equilibrium and
pH. Only four minerals are considered explicitly, yet the graph appears to explain the
formation of gibbsite, kaolinite, and montmorillonite, and their control of Al 3+ as a
function of H4SiO40. As the H4SiO40 concentration increases, first gibbsite, then
kaolinite, and finally montmorillonite become, in turn, the most stable mineral of the
group (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
The most stable mineral also is the least soluble. At a log (H 4SiO2) activity of -3.0, the
montmorillonite line (pH 6, pMg 3.7) is below the metastable extension of the logAl3+
+ 3 pH kaolinite stability line (dashed), which is below the metastable (dashed)
extension of the gibbsite stability line. Because the pH of the system is fixed, the
lowest value of log Al3+ + 3pH is the lowest value of Al3+. Gibbsite supports almost
10,000 times as much Al3+ as montmorillonite at log (H4SiO40) of -3.0 and pH 7.0. At
log (H4SiO40) of -6.0, their relative solubilities are reversed (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
- 42 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
43/66
The two montmorillonite stability lines (contours) in fig. 2.13 indicate that
montmorillonite becomes more stable as the pH increases and as pMg decreases. This
increased montmorillonite stability comes at the expense of kaolinite, whose stability
range is correspondingly restricted. The point where the montmorillonite and kaolinite
stability lines intersect defines the chemical conditions under which these two
minerals can be in equilibrium with each other. Montmorillonite-amorphous silica and
kaolinite-gibbsite are also compatible pairs. Incompatible pairs are amorphous
silicagibbsite and montmorillonitc-gibbsite (unless solution conditions are such that
montmorillonitc becomes sufficiently stable to eliminate the kaolinite stability field
entirely). Perhaps the most important insight to be gained from fig. 2.13 is an
appreciation that a variety of minerals can be formed in soils in response to a variety
of soil-solution environments and that the chemical weathering environment can be
quantified (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
The relative solubility of selected primary and secondary minerals is Plotted in fig.
2.14. It should be emphasized that the accuracy of the stability of a given mineral
depends on the conditions assumed for the diagram as well as on the accuracy of the
thermodynamic data used in the calculations. These diagrams can be extended to
include other minerals for which thermodynamic data are available and other
environmental conditions not considered in fig. 2.14. In these diagrams, the mineral
that maintains the lowest log Al3+ + 3pH activity at a given H4SiO40 activity is the
most stable. For example, at log (H4SiO40) of -7.0, the minerals in order of increasing
stability are Na-glass, K-glass, vermiculite, low albite, Ca-glass, analcime (same as
Ca-glass), microcline, pyroxene, montmorillonite, anorthite, chlorite (same as
anorthite), kaolinite and gibbsite (Dixon and Weed, 1989).
- 43 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
44/66
Fig. 2.14. Relative solubility of selected primary and secondary minerals at pH 7.0 when log Mg2+= logNa+ log K = -3, log Ca2+ = -2.5, and log Fe3+ is in equilibrium with hematite (Kittrick, 1970)
The stability sequences based on thermodynamic data depend on the chemical
conditions in the weathering environment, such as H4SiO40 activity, pH, and the
precise activities of other ions; by contrast, the empirical sequences are fixed, and
thus changes in weathering environment cannot be taken into consideration. In
general, however, the thermodynamic data support the empirical observations, namely
(Dixon and Weed, 1989):
1. The primary minerals dissolve to form clay minerals
2. Montmorillonites are stable in solutions with high H4SiO40 activity (poorly drained
conditions)
3. Kaolinites are stable in solutions of moderate H4SiO40 activity (well drained) and
4. Gibbsite is stable only under conditions where H4SiO40 activity is very low
In addition to the relative stabilities of minerals, information regarding environmental
conditions needed for the possible formation of these minerals also can be obtained
from the stability diagrams.
- 44 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
45/66
2.6. Pridiction of clay mineralogy
The ratio of CEC by ammonium acetate at pH 7 to clay can be used to predict clay
mineralogy. If the ratio is multiplied by 100, the product is cmol(+)/kg clay (Soil
Survey Staff, 2006). The typical ratio for some classes of clay mineralogy arementioned in Table 2.4
Table 2.4
The typical ratio of CEC to clay for some classes of clay mineralogy
Source: Soil Survey Staff, 2006
These ratios are more valid when some detailed mineralogy data are available. If the
ratio of 1500 kPa water to clay is 0.25 or less or 0.6 or more, the ratio of CEC by
ammonium acetate to clay is not valid. Ratios of 1500 kPa water to clay of 0.6 or
more are typical of poorly dispersed clays, andic and spodic materials with an isotic
mineralogy class, and ratios of less than 0.3 are common in some soils that contain
large amounts of gypsum ((Soil Survey Staff, 2006)).
A ratio of CEC at pH 8.2 to 1500 kPa water of more than 1.5 and more exchange
acidity than the sum of bases plus KCl extrctable Al imply a soil with a high pH-
dependent charge. Along with bulk density data, they help to distinguish soils that
have andic and spodic materials or soils that have materials with an isotic mineralogy
class from soils with materials that are more crystalline (Soil Survey Staff, 2006).
2.7. Ganges Floodplain soils of Bangladesh
- 45 -
Typical ratio of CEC to clay classes of clay mineralogy
0.7 Smectite
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
46/66
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
47/66
Bangladesh is apparently flat alluvial plain with apparent homogenous land and soil
condition and it, in fact, has a complex land pattern and soil condition. It has three
distinct land system: Floodplain, Terrace and Hill (Rahman, 2005).
Huizing (1971) made a reconnaissance study on the sand mineralogy of Bangladeshsoils and reported that hill and terrace soils Contained low feldspathic and micaceous
minerals while floodplain soils were rich in feldspar, mica and amphiboles.
Hasibullah et al. (1971) studied the clay mineralogy of Nunni series of_Northern and
Eastern Piedmont Plains, Borda series of Middle Meghna River Floodplain and
Noadda and Chhiata series of terrace areas. They reported that all these soils were
dominated by mica and kaolinite except for Borda series. Vermiculite was dominant
in the two floodplain soils while randomly interstratified minerals dominated the twoterrace soils.
Hassan and Razzq (1981) studied four soil profiles from the Sunderban forest area on
Ganges Tidal Floodplain and found that all soils were dominated by mica and
smectite with some katolinite, chlorite; vermiculite and interstratified minerals. white
(l985) reported qualitative estimates of clay mineralogical composition of a large
number of soils and opined that mica (muscovite) and kaolinite were the predominant
minerals in the clay fraction of most floodplain soils. He speculated that mica wastransformed to vermiculite under acidic condition, in the BrahmaPutra, Meghna and
Tista floodplain soils; while under neutral to alkaline reaction and poor drainage
conditions mica was transformed tosmectite (montmorillonite). He also reported the
occurrence of halloysite in the surface and smectite in the lower horizons of some
terrace soils.
Saheed (1985) reported three groups of mineralogical association in Bangladesh soils
mica, vermiculite and kaolinite in most floodplain soils; smectite along with mica inGangeas floodplain soils; and mica and halloysite in terrace soils. Mineralogy of silt,
and fine and coarse clays of four soil profiles was studied by Islam and Lotse (1986).
Using X-ray dilfraction (XRD), ion exchange and selective dissolution techniques.
Mica and smectite were found to be dominant in Batra and Ghior series of Ganges
River Floodplain, whereas mica and kaolinite were dominant in Naraibag and Ghatail
series of Old Meghna Estuarine Floodplain and Old BrahmaPutra Floodplain,
respectively.
- 47 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
48/66
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
49/66
than in calcareous soils; calcareous soils contained smectite in large quantities while
noncalcareous soils were rich in vermiculite. Mazumder (1996) reported the clay
mineralogical composition of seven soil profiles of Brahmaputra floodplain and found
that all soils were rich in mica, kaolinite and vermiculite while chlorite was identified
in some soils.
Aramaki (1996) studied 11 soil profiles for the clay mineralogical composition and
reported that mica was dominant in all soils, smectite in Ganges floodplain soils,
interstratified mica-vermiculite-smectite and interstratified kaolinite-smectite or
kaolinite in terrace soils. kaolinite was rich in hill soils and even greater than mica,
while Old Brahmaputra and Meghna floodplain soils contained good amounts of
chlorite and vermiculite. Khan et al. (1997) studied five benchmark sail profiles fromdifferent floodplain of Bangladesh and found that mica was the dominant mineral in
all soils. Smectite was dominant in Ganges floodplain soils only. Varing amounts of
kaolinite and vermiculite were present in all soils.
Idenification of kaolinite as a dominant mineral in most floodplain soils was a matter
of great controversy among the reports. Mia (1990), White (1985), Saheed (1985), Ali
(1994), Islam and Lotse (1986), Mazumder ( 1996), and Khan et al. (1997) reported
high quantity of kaolinite in different floodplains soils while others found smalleramounts of kaolinite in those soils.
The clay mineralogical map of Bangladesh (Fig. 2.15) was prepared by Hussain et al.
(1999).
- 49 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
50/66
Fig. 2.15 A clay mineralogical map of Bangladesh soils. Dots indicate location of soil sampling sites.
Legends: 1. mica-chlorite suite; 2. mica-smectite suite; 3. mica- vermiculite- kaolinite suite; 4. mica-
chlorite- vermiculite suite; 5. mica -mixed-layer-minerals- kaolinite suite; 6. kaolinite -mica suite; 7.
mica kaolinite- vermiculite suite; and 8. mica-kaolinite- vermiculite suite ( Hussain et al., 1999).
- 50 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
51/66
3. Material And Methods
A study was conducted to asses the mineralogy of some soils of Ganges river
floodplain area in the south-western region of Bangladesh.
3.1. Study area
The samples were collected from different locations of Jessore and Satkhira district.
General information of sampling sites are presented in Table 3.1
Table 3.1 General information of sampling sites
Sample No. Address Physiography Agricultural Land Use
1
Village: Mohakal
Union: Noapara
Thana: Avoynagar
District: Jessore
Ganges TidalFloodplain Sesbania
2
Village: Ghoragasa
Union: Norendropur
Mouza: Ghoragasa
District: Jessore
Ganges MeanderFloodplain
Vegetables-Ginger-Tumeric-Fallow
3
Village: Ramnagar
Union: Ramnagar
Mouza: Sutigata
District: Jessore
Ganges MeanderFloodplain
Teak plants
4
Village: TeghoriUnion: Deora
Mouza: Teghori
Thana: Kotowali
District: Jessore
Ganges MeanderFloodplain
Amon-Jute -Pulses
5
Village:Meghla
Union:Chachra
Thana:Kotowali
Dist:Jessore
Ganges MeanderFloodplain
Fallow
6
Village: Navaron
Union: Navaron
Mouza: Jhikorgacha
Thana: Jhikorgacha
District: Jessore
Ganges MeanderFloodplain
Marigold
7
Village: Jhapaghat
Union: Helatola
Mouza: Brozobaksha
Thana: kolaroa
District: Satkhira
Ganges MeanderFloodplain
Jute-Potato-Rice
8 Village: Jhapaghat
Union: Helatola
Mouza: BrozobakshaThana: Kolaroa
Ganges MeanderFloodplain
Vegetables
- 51 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
52/66
District: Satkhira
3.2. Collection of soil samples
A total of 8 soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis. Representative soil
samples were collected from surface only. The samples were placed in plastic bags.
3.3. Processing of soil samples
The collected soil samples were dried in air by spreading on separate sheet of papers
after it was transported to laboratory. After drying in air, the larger aggregates were
broken gently by crushing in a wooden hammer. A portion of the crushed soil was
passed through a 2.0 mm sieve. The sieved soil were then preserved in plastic bag and
labeled properly. These were later used for various chemical analyses. The chemical
analyses were carried out on those collected soil samples in the laboratory of the Soil
Science discipline in Khulna University.
3.4. Soil analyses
Different parameters of soil were analyzed by following the available procedures.
3.4.1. Particle size analysis
The particle size was determined by hydrometer method presented by Gee and Bauder
(1986).
3.4.2. pH
Soil pH (1:2.5) was determined electrochemically by using of glass electrode with the
procedure of Jackson (1973).
3.4.3. ECe
The ECe of the soil was measured at a soil water ratio of 1:1 by EC meter (USDA,
2004)
3.4.4. Organic carbon
Soil organic carbon was determined by of Wakley and Blacks (1934) wet oxidation
method as described by Jackson (1973).
3.4.5. Cation exchange capacity
- 52 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
53/66
CEC was determined by method as described by Jackson (1973); extracting the soil
with 1N NH4OAc solution of pH 7 followed by replacing ammonium from the
exchange site by 2N KCl (Jackson, 1973).
3.4.6. Exchangeable K+
For the determination of exchangeable K+ soil was extracted with 1N NH4OAC
solution of pH 7.0 as described by Piper (1950) and Jackson (1973).
3.4.7. Water soluble K+
Water soluble K+ was determined after extraction with distilled water as described by
Jackson (1973).
3.4.8.
Water soluble Mg2+
Water soluble Mg2+ was determined in a combination determination process of
Ca2+and Mg2+, after extraction with distilled water as described by Piper (1950).
- 53 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
54/66
4. Result and Discussion
The results obtained from laboratory analysis will be discussed in this section.
4.1. Physical Characteristics
The texture of the samples varied from loam to clay loam (Table 4.1). This result
resembles to several findings by other researches. SRDI staff (1965-86) found that on
the young Ganges meander floodplain, soils of ridges and inter-ridges depressions are
silt loam to silty clay; and on the old Ganges meander floodplain, soils of ridges and
depressions are loamy to clay in texture.
Highest value of sand percentage was observed in sample no. 1 (51%) and lowest
value of sand percentage was in sample no. 2 (19%) (Table 4.1). Highest value of siltpercentage was in sample no. 5 (60%) and lowest in sample no. 6 (38%) (Table 4.1).
Highest value of clay percentage was observed in sample no. 6 and 7 (Table 4.1) and
lowest in sample no. 1 (10%) (Table 4.1).
4.2. Chemical Characteristics
4.2.1. pH
Among the samples pH values were varied from 5.9 to 7.22 (Table 4.1). pH 5.9 was
found in sample no. 4 whereas 7.22 was found in sample no. 7.
4.2.2. EC
EC values were varied from 0.59 dS/m (sample no. 5) to 3.84 dS/m (sample no. 1)
among the samples (Table 4.1).
4.2.3. CEC
CEC values were varied from 42.56 cmolc/Kg (sample no. 7) to 10.92 cmolc/Kg soil
(sample no. 3) among the samples (Table 4.1).
4.2.4. K+ content
Water soluble K+ content were varied from 0.04 cmolc/Kg (sample no. 6) to 0.10
cmolc/Kg (sample no. 8) among the samples (Table 4.1).
Exchangeable K+ content were varied from 0.04 cmolc/Kg (sample no. 5) to 0.32
cmolc/Kg (sample no. 7) among the samples (Table 4.1).
- 54 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
55/66
Table 4.1 Different properties of studied soils
- 55 -
Soil Property 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Physical PSA
Sand (%) 51 19 27 28 27 27 21 24
Silt (%) 39 61 58 48 60 38 44 42
Clay (%)10
20 15 24 13 35 35 34
Texture LoamSilt
loamSilt
loamLoam
Siltloam
Clayloam
Clayloam
Clayloam
Chemical
pH 6.9 6.1 7.1 5.9 6.76 6.67 7.22 7.02
EC (dS/m) 3.84 0.69 0.94 0.77 0.59 0.73 0.98 1.37
CEC (cmolc/Kg) 19.10 18.75 10.92 15.04 17.04 31.91 42.56 27.17
K content(cmolc/Kg)
Exchang-eable
0.11 0.10 0.20 0.12 0.04 0.05 0.32 0.23
Watersoluble
0.07 0.05 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.10
Mg content(cmolc/Kg)
Watersoluble
1.43 0.41 0.34 1.19 0.58 1.50 1.77 0.72
Organic C (%) 0.78 0.62 0.64 0.60 0.53 0.41 0.90 0.47
Humus (%) 1.34 1.08 1.11 1.04 0.91 0.71 1.55 0.81
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
56/66
4.2.5. Mg2+ content
Water soluble Mg2+ content were varied from 1.77cmolc/Kg (sample no. 7) to 0.34
cmolc/Kg (sample no. 3) among the samples (Table 4.1).
4.2.6. Organic C and humus
Highest value of Organic C (0.90%) and humus (1.55%) was found in sample no. 7
and lowest value of these was 0.41% and 0.71%, respectively in sample no. 6 (Table
4.1).
4.3. Prediction of clay minerals
The clay mineralogy of the soil samples was predicted from the ratio of CEC by
ammonium acetate at pH 7 to clay (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and the result ispresented in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2
The clay mineralogy of the soil samples
Samples No. Ratio of CEC to clay Probable Clay Mineralogy
1 1.91 Smectitic
2 0.94 Smectitic
3 0.73 Smectite
4 0.63 Mixed or Smectitic5 1.31 Smectitic
6 0.91 Smectitic
7 1.22 Smectitic
8 0.799 Smectitic
4.4. Weathering stability of clay minerals
According to Faure (1992), pedological indices for studied soil samples are shown in
Table 4.3.
- 56 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
57/66
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
58/66
principle the following equilibrium reactions of [Eq. 4.1] Illite Muscovite will shift
to left hand side. As a result Illite can form in the environment.
1.3 [(Al1.80 Mg0.25) (Si3.50 Al0.50) O10 (OH)2]K0.60 + 0.22K+ + 0.43H+
KAl2Si3AlO10(OH)2 + 1.55 SiO2 (amorphous) + 0.325 Mg2+ + 0.5H2O . [4.1]
In all soil samples, the highest value of log [Mg2+]/[H+]2envwas 12.39 and lowest was
9.57(Table 4.3) which were higher than the value of log [Mg2+]/[H+]2eqi (6.42).
According to Le Chatelirs principle the following equilibrium reactions [Eq. 4.2] of
Kaolinite Mgmontmorillonite will shift to right hand side and as a result formation
of Mg-montmorillonite may be possible in environment.
7 Al2Si2O5(OH)4 + 8 SiO2 (amorphous) + Mg2+
6[(Al2.00) (Si3.67 Al0.33)O10(OH)2] Mg0.167 + 7H2O + 2H+ .. [4.2]
The values of log [Mg2+]/[H+]2envin all soil samples were varied from 12.39 to 9.57
(Table 4.3) whereas the value of log [Mg2+]/[H+]2eqiwas in Faure (1992) equilibrium
equations was 3.29. So the following equilibrium reaction [Eq. 4.3] of Illite Mg-
montmorillonitewill shift to right hand side.
1.013[(Al1.08Mg0.25)(Si3.50Al0.50)O10(OH)2]K0.60 + 0.1245SiO2 (amorphous) + 0.781H+
[(Al2.00) (Si3.67 Al0.33)O10(OH)2] Mg0.167 + 0.086 Mg2+ +0.405 H2O [4.3]
Among all the soil samples, the values of log [Mg 2+]/[H+]2env varied form 12.39 to
9.57 (Table 4.3). according to Faure (1992), the equilibrium value of log [Mg 2+]/
[H+]2eqi was 11.36 (Table 4.4). The higher log[Mg2+]/[H+]2env value indicates the
possibility of formation of Chlorite from Mg-montmorillonite. The values of log
[Mg2+]/[H+]2env was higherthan 11.36 in sample no. 1 (11.65), 7 (12.39) and 8 (11.60).
The equilibrium reaction [Eq. 4.4] of Mg-montmorillonite Chlorite is[(Al2.00)(Si3.67 Al0.33)O10(OH)2] Mg0.167 + 5.658 Mg2+ + 9.32 H2O
1.165 Mg5Al2Si3O10(OH)8 + 0.175 SiO2 + 11.316 H+ .. [4.4]
- 58 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
59/66
5. Summary and Conclusion
The physiography of studied soil samples were both Ganges Tidal and Meander
floodplain. The landscape was nearly leveled basin and poorly drained. The mineralogical
property and weathering stability of minerals were studied in laboratory.
From the ratio of CEC to clay percentage the clay minerals presented in the
soils were predicted. The dominant clay mineral in almost all the soils were
Smectitic. Only Teghori soil (sample no. 4) contained mixed or Smectitic
dominant clay mineral.
Almost all the studied soils had the tendency to transform into Mg-
montmorrillonite. In illite-muscovite system, illite is more stable than
muscovite. Muscovite was more stable than illite in Jhapaghat soil (sample no.
7 and 8). In Mg-montmorrillonite-chlorite system, chlorite was more stable
than Mg-montmorrillonite for Jhapaghat soil (sample no. 7 and 8). Different
cropping pattern had relatively same weathering stability of the minerals, thus
it can be said that stability of minerals was not affected significantly by
cropping pattern of the soils.
- 59 -
7/28/2019 Prediction of Mineralogy of Some Soils of Ganges Floodplain Under Different Cropping Patterns
60/66
5. References
Adams, W.A.; Evans, L.J. and Abdulla H.H. 1971. Quantitative pedological studies
on soil derived from Silurian mudstones. . Laboratory and in situ
weathering of chlorite. Soil Science, 22: 158-165.
Alam, M.L. 1994. Studies on Clay Mineralogical Characteristics and Their Effects on
K Release and Fixation Behaviors of Bangladesh Soils. Dissertation to The
United Graduate School of Agriculture Sciences, Kagoshima University, pp.
151.
Alam, M.L., Miyauchi, N. and Shinagawa, A. 1993a. Study on clay mineralogical
characteristics of calcareous and noncalcareous soils of Bangladesh. Clay
Science. 9: 81-97.
Alam, M.L., Miyauchi, N. and Shinagawa, A. 1993b. Study on clay mineralogical
characteristics of hill and terrace soils of Bangladesh. Clay Science. 9: 109-
121.
Ali, M.L. 1994. Effect of Alternate Wetting and Drying Cycles on Pedogenic
Processes of Some Representative Bangladesh Soils. Ph.D. Thesis, University
of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Armaki, K. 1996. Mineralogical Composition of Main Bangladesh Soils. Graduation
Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, pp. 38.
Bassett, W.A. 1959. The origin of vermiculite deposits at Libby, Montana. American
Mineralogist, 44: 282-299.
Bear, F.E. 1964. Chemistry of The Soil. 2nd Edition. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Bhon, H.L.; McNeal, B.L. and OConnor, G.A. 1979. Soil Chemistry. John Wiley
and Sons. Inc., Canada.
Borchardt, G.A.; Jackson, M.L. and Hole, F.D. 1966. Expansible layer silicate genesis
in soils deplicted in mica pseudomorphs. In: Heller, L. and Weiss, A. (eds.),
Israel Program of Scientific Translations. Proceedings of the International
Clay Conference, Volume 1, 20-24 June 1966, Jerusalem,
Top Related