Download - Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Transcript
Page 1: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Community Philanthropy 2.0

Research Findings

Presented by

1

Last updated: March 26, 2009

Page 2: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Can Foundations Build a Bridge to the Social Web?

Community Philanthropy 2.0 2

Page 3: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

The Hope

• Some successes already– Kiva– Case Foundation: American Giving Challenge– charity: Water

• Successes have been in pockets, and harness the micro• What about the wired wealthy?

Community Philanthropy 2.0 3

Page 4: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

The Challenge

• Traditional media channels – TV and Newspapers -- are losing power

• Social web represents the new domain, but there are barriers to entry:– Technology (and nomenclature)– New communication paradigms

• Economic recession (or restructuring)

How does one become relevant?

Community Philanthropy 2.0 4

Page 5: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

How We Approached Finding an Answer

• Qualitative and quantitative research• National Survey

– <800 donor respondents– >400 social media savvy respondents

• National and regional content scans• > 25 relevant interviews

Community Philanthropy 2.0 5

Page 6: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

The Answer: Building a Bridge Is Possible!

Community Philanthropy 2.0 6

Page 7: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Primary Findings

• There’s a great opportunity amongst the 30-49 segment• 47% of all respondents 30-49 donate >$1,000• 78% of of all respondents 30-49 participate in social media• 27% of all respondents 30-49 trust it for important

philanthropic information

• <30 year old segment did not donate enough to be considered viable for major donor cultivation

• ≥50 year old segment did not participate in social media enough

Community Philanthropy 2.0 7

Source: Aggregate Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 8: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Current Landscape: Content Scans

• Lots of philanthropic activity on the social web– Chaotic and fragmented– No dominant voice or authority– Financials gains are limited to the thousands

• Hotbeds of activity on major social networks• Do good social networks connect millions• Yet do-good social conversations rarely evolve to the state of

philanthropy, instead focus on independent causes• High dollar donors are rarely visible

Community Philanthropy 2.0 8

Source: Content Scans

Page 9: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Current Landscape: Large Players Not Present

• Traditional voices don’t play a major role– Foundations– Major charities (United Way, Salvation Army, etc.)

• Chronicle of Philanthropy harnessing blogs• Conversations are issue specific• No real local conversations

Void in authoritative, ongoing and local conversations represents an opportunity for foundations.

Community Philanthropy 2.0 9

Source: Content Scans

Page 10: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Building the Social Web Bridge to 30-49 Yr. Olds

Community Philanthropy 2.0 10

Page 11: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

30-49 Year Old Conversation Wants

• 68% want credible information• 66% want it from a trustworthy source• Secondary interests:

– 39% want information from philanthropic experts– 36% want access to other donors

Community Philanthropy 2.0 11

Source: Aggregate Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 12: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Donors 30-49 Prefer Community Oriented Content

Community Oriented Content• 45% social networks• 23% review sites• 21% message boards• 19% online forums• 17% wikis

Traditional Social Media• 15% blogs• 13% podcasts • 4% video

Community Philanthropy 2.0 12

Source: Aggregate Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 13: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Analysis

• Three Dominant Indicators– Credible information– Trusted source– Community oriented social media

• Opportunity for a meaningful conversation on philanthropic matters and charities.

• Individual conversations not the right approach for trust• Instead focus on overarching community initiatives• The Guidestar Model

Community Philanthropy 2.0 13

Source: Aggregate Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 14: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Donors 30-49 Desire Certain Types of Conversations

• Whether or not a nonprofit is successfully making an impact (75 percent)

• Learning about organizations that are actively working on issues and causes I care about (62 percent)

• Success stories and updates on the progress of nonprofits I support (54 percent)

• Information/updates on the issues and causes I care about (54 percent)

• Financial accountability and governance of nonprofits I support (51 percent)

Community Philanthropy 2.0 14

Source: Aggregate Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 15: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Interviews Shed Additional Light

• Connect with other donors online regarding philanthropy in their local communities

• Preferences for such an online community vary greatly– peer opinions and discussions – common interest areas among participants – types of data available

• “Cost of entry” is ability to trust online space and participants

Community Philanthropy 2.0 15

Source: Aggregate Interview Findings

Page 16: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Donors 30-49 Want Privacy

Forty-one percent say private conversations matter to them

Community Philanthropy 2.0 16

Source: Aggregate Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 17: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Social Media Savvy 30-49 Verify Donor Trends

• Important because they represent the unharvested donor, and what donors will act like once they adapt

• 81 percent want highly credible, strong quality info• 77 percent want a trusted source.

Community Philanthropy 2.0 17

Source: Aggregate Social Media Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 18: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Social Media Savvy 30-49 Like Community Content… And Blogs

• Social networks – 66%• Blogs – 50% • Wiki – 24%• Review Sites – 17%• Message Boards – 16%• Online forums – 10%• Podcasts – 10%• Video – 5%

Community Philanthropy 2.0 18

Source: Aggregate Social Media Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 19: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Social Media Savvy 30-49 Want Similar Conversations

• Whether or not a nonprofit is successfully making an impact (80 percent)

• Success stories and updates on the progress of nonprofits I support (74 percent)

• Learning about organizations that are actively working on issues and causes I care about (71 percent)

• Information/updates on the issues and causes I care about (70 percent)

BUT, private conversations are not important to them. 41 percent say they prefer public networks.

Community Philanthropy 2.0 19

Source: Aggregate Social Media Survey Results for 30-49 year olds

Page 20: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Conclusion

• High dollar donors aged 30-49 would welcome social media-oriented philanthropic activity with these caveats:– Highly credible, strong quality info– From a trusted source– With community oriented dialogue

• Currently, the social web does not offer this kind of conversation

• Opportunity: Consider the powerful results such an engaged community could create

Community Philanthropy 2.0 20

Page 21: Philanthropy 2.0 Social Media Research

Given the Ability to Build This Dynamic Bridge, What Are You Waiting For?

Community Philanthropy 2.0 21