Aligning the University Legislative Framework to meet the new Higher Education Competitive Environment
Mr Peter Marshall Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice-President
Contents
Monash University
Background
Impact of deregulation
Partnerships with Private Providers
Course and Unit offerings
Review of Monash Statutes and Regulations
2
Monash University
Total student enrolments – 60,000
Total staff FTE – 3,300 academic & 4,500 professional
10 Faculties across 7 campuses (5 Australian and 2 International)
International Centres in Prato, India and China
Global network – Monash Warwick Alliance
Research Income of more than A$300million
In the top one per cent of world universities – 91st in the world – according to the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (2013-2014)
3
Background
Increasing competition in traditional Higher Education models:
In particular:
– On-line offerings – cost/convenience; – Private providers; – International providers; – Fee (price) deregulation.
4
Australia’s relationship with private providers
In particular, Australia has seen significant growth in private providers:
– Navitas – the industry leader in pre-university and university pathway programs offering 32 university programs in Australia, UK, USA, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore and Sri Lanka;
– Pearson – more than 11 million students have used their learning technologies worldwide over the past decade;
– Laureate – a network of more than 75 campus-based and online universities offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs to over 850,000 students around the world spanning 29 countries throughout the Americas, Europe, Africa, Asia and the Middle East.
Private providers operate as partners (with public universities) and competitors in different market segments.
5
Deregulation
Opportunity for more private providers into the market
Universities facing will be competing against more providers with capacity to offer similar courses for less
Access to Commonwealth Support Places (70% of CSP funding)
6
Partnership approach
Monash already has partnerships with private providers:
– Monash South Africa and Laureate – Monash Online and Pearson
This is driven by their key features of:
– Price competitiveness – Focus on retention – Strong technically heavy recruitment and student service processes – “Slick” processes to bring their product to the market “on demand”
7
Monash processes – Unit and course offerings
Monash 2009: took 12 – 36 months to introduce new unit or course offering
Private providers were able to do this in 3 months
Slow, manual, duplicated processes (Department, Faculty Board, Academic Board – overlaid with a patchwork of committees)
A governance structure which made it almost impossible to introduce new offerings as well as abolish old
Monash was missing out on market share
8
The state of Monash Legislation in 2009
1 Act (Monash University Act 1958)
33 Statutes (requiring Ministerial approval to change)
20 sets of regulations (Council approval to change)
68 faculty regulations (faculty board oversight – generated more than 1 million A4 pages each year)
110 Policies in the Policy Bank
9
Review of Statutes and Regulations
To survive in the market we had to bring our governance structures to remain competitive In January 2013 the University commissioned a review and redrafting of its statutes
and regulations
Principles of the review: – Balancing good governance, efficiency and competitiveness – Reducing the regulatory and cost burden on Monash staff – Including only what is agreed as required and/or sufficient weight and
importance to be in Statutes and Regulations and making more extensive use of Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and delegations
10
11
What do we need to regulate?
What is required under the Act?
What is required or expected by the Minister?
What does Council require?
What is required by senior management?
What is required according to principles of good governance? What should be removed from the statutes and regulations?
Are the current statutes and regulations still relevant and fit for purpose?
Would the content of any current statutes and regulations be more appropriately contained in University policies or delegations?
Where are there opportunities to streamline?
Can the number and complexity of statutes and regulations be reduced?
Can administrative burden be reduced through streamlining?
Can governance and compliance be improved?
Are there areas where governance and compliance can be improved by updating and simplifying or rationalising statutes and regulations?
Are there other ways we can better deliver the requirements of the Act, the Minister, Council, Vice-Chancellor and senior management?
Key lines of enquiry for the recommended review
Review of Statutes and Regulations
For a matter to remain in statute – must meet the following criteria:
– Matters required by the Monash University Act 2009 – Matters which Council determines should be in statutes – Matters which are required to establish the authority of the University to
enforce rules about individual conduct and rules for its premises, facilities and services
– Allocations of powers (ie specifying or clarifying the roles and responsibilities of Council, the Vice-Chancellor, the Academic Board, and the relationships between them)
– Authorisation for regulations (regulation-making power should be given by statute)
12
The new regulatory framework
13
Core reform in statute – clarifying the role of Academic Board and the VC
14
Statute 2.2 – The Academic Board
The Academic Board is to inform the Vice-Chancellor before putting any report or recommendation to Council and before the Board makes any regulations
Statute 3.2.1 – The Vice-Chancellor and President
• Affirms that the Vice-Chancellor is the chief academic officer of the University, as well as its chief executive officer
• Deletes references to faculty boards
• Gives the Vice-Chancellor explicit power to delegate his or her powers and functions to senior officer(s) of the university
The Statute sets out the allocation of powers between the Council, the Vice-Chancellor and the Academic Board
The criteria or principles applied in making this allocation are: • Where the matter needs University-wide governance oversight - the
regulations are made by Council • Where the matter encompasses academic issues but also requires
considerations or involves issues about university governance, administration, and/or university operations (including finance and infrastructure resourcing) - the regulations are made by the Vice-Chancellor
• Where the matter is primarily one of academic quality and standard - the regulations are made by Academic Board.
15
16
Matters covered by Council Regulations include:
The Council: meetings; committees The Vice-Chancellor and Deputy Vice-Chancellors Awards: degrees and other awards The Academic Board including its powers, functions and procedures Faculties: membership; Deans: Appointment by the VC, and powers of delegation Student discipline Revocation of degrees or other awards Recognised Student Associations Campus Service Councils The Common Seal Gifts, grants and bequests
17
Matters covered by the Vice-Chancellor Regulations include:
The Faculties and Deans
Additional requirements for admission to courses of study
Graduate Research Committee
Intellectual Property
Exclusion for health reasons
University Library
Fees
Miscellaneous (Trespass; University Holidays; Student Loans; Monash University Equity Fund)
18
Matters covered by the Academic Board Regulations include:
Entrance and admission requirements
Units, coursework degrees and other awards
Exclusion for unsatisfactory progress or inability to progress
Higher degrees by research
Candidature progress management
Outcomes of the review
19
Outcomes of the review 1. 30+ statutes and 20+ sets of regulations have been
reduced to 1 statute and 3 sets of regulations
2. Together the Act, the statute and regulations set out clearly the roles of the Council, the Vice-Chancellor, Provost, Deputy Vice-Chancellors, Vice-Provosts, Deans, the Academic Board and the Graduate Research Committee
3. The abolition of faculty boards (and their committees) – saving enormous time and resources
4. Clarifies responsibility for decision-making about the establishment of new courses of study, and thus supports greater flexibility and speed in responding to market opportunities
20
Questions
21
Top Related