1
OPERANDO SPECTROSCOPY OF ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY CONVERSION
DEVICES
A thesis presented
by
Emily Anne Lewis
to
The Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science
in the field of
Chemistry
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts
April, 2009
2
OPERANDO SPECTROSCOPY OF ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY CONVERSION
DEVICES
by
Emily Anne Lewis
ABSTRACT OF THESIS
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Master of Science in Chemistry
in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of
Northeastern University, April, 2009
3
ABSTRACT
A fuel cell for operando FTIR and x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was
designed and constructed. The cell is based on the combination of operando cells
previously developed in the Smotkin group. Special consideration was put into the
design to enable both transmission XAS, fluorescence XAS, and diffuse reflectance FTIR
spectroscopy. Operando x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy of the Pt cathode was
accomplished at Argonne national labs.
The x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) region of the fluorescence
XAS spectra was analyzed by subtractive normalization (∆-XANES). Using this
technique, the trends in the data became apparent: there were both time- and potential-
dependence in the reduction of surface and sub-surface Pt-oxides. The time constant for
the reduction of these oxides was greater than two hours at 530 mV, much longer than
previously expected.
Theoretical ∆-XANES (∆-XANES signatures) of oxygen adsorbates on Pt clusters
were modeled using FEFF8 software. Two new models were developed to generate the
∆-XANES signatures: the isolated all-atoms Janin cluster, and the embedded all-atoms
Janin cluster. The progressive development of these models provides insight concerning
the relative charge depletion of surface and subsurface atoms, and the compensation of
charge transfer by platinum-reservoir electron density.
Future directions of the operando spectroscopy cell include using electrochemical
promotion of organic chemistry (EPOCH) to assist epoxide ring-opening reactions for
pharmaceutical building blocks, and the study of fuel cell poisoning by common
atmospheric pollutants.
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First I would like to thank Dr. Eugene Smotkin for initially taking me into his lab
as an undergraduate. Dr. Smotkin’s support and guidance have pushed me to explore the
limits my capabilities as a scientist. His enthusiasm and creativity have inspired me in
my educational pursuits. I would also like to thank the Smotkin research group for their
help and encouragement throughout my time in the lab.
I am very grateful to my thesis committee, Dr. Mabrouk and Dr. Mukerjee, whose
comments helped shape my thesis into its final form. I would also like to thank Dr.
Mabrouk for her guidance beyond my thesis. Finally, I would like to thank the rest of the
faculty and staff from the department who provided assistance and direction during my
time at Northeastern.
Finally I would like to acknowledge the support from my family and friends. My
parents, Theresa and Kevin, have always been there for me through all of my academic
and extracurricular endeavors. I would also like to thank all of my friends at Sunday
night dinner for being my home away from home.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract 2
Acknowledgements 4
Table of Contents 5
List of Figures 7
List of Abbreviations 8
Chapter 1: Introduction 10
1.1 PEM Fuel Cells 10
1.2 Operando Spectroscopy 13
1.2.1 Operando XAS 15
1.2.2 Operando FTIR 18
1.3 Research Objectives 19
Chapter 2: Operando Cell Design 21
2.1 Introduction 21
2.1.1 Legacy cells 21
2.2 Multi-Spectroscopic Cell Design Features 23
2.3 Experimental 25
2.4 Results and Discussion 26
2.5 Conclusions 29
Chapter 3: Time- and Potential-Dependent XAS 30
3.1 Introduction 30
3.2 Experimental 31
3.3 Results & Discussion 32
6
3.3.1 Time dependent Δ-XANES 32
3.3.2 Potential dependent Δ-XANES 33
3.4 Conclusions 35
Chapter 4: Theoretical Modeling of ∆-XANES Spectra 36
4.1 Introduction 36
4.2 Methods 40
4.2.1 Janin all-atoms signatures 40
4.2.2 Embedded all-atoms signatures 40
4.3 Results & Discussion 41
4.4 Conclusions 47
Chapter 5: Future Directions - Operando FTIR 48
5.1 Poisoning Studies 48
5.1.1 Introduction 48
5.1.2 Hypothesis and Goals 48
5.2 Epoxide Ring-Opening with EPOCH 49
5.2.1 Introduction 49
5.2.2 Hypothesis and Goals 50
References 51
7
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell schematic
Figure 1.2: An illustration of the scattering events of XAS
Figure 2.1: Legacy cells for operando spectroscopy
Figure 2.2: New multi-spectroscopic cell for operando spectroscopy
Figure 2.3: Illustrated exploded view of the cell
Figure 2.4: Photo of the cell in line at Argonne National Laboratory
Figure 2.5: Photo of the cell interface with an FTIR
Figure 2.6: Polarization curve obtained with the multi-spectroscopic cell
Figure 2.7: Comparison of XAS data acquired with the Viswanathan cell the new multi-
spectroscopic cell
Figure 3.1: Time-dependent operando fluorescence XAS fingerprints
Figure 3.2: Potential-dependent operando fluorescence XAS fingerprints
Figure 3.3: The error distribution through a ∆µ fingerprint
Figure 4.1: Janin cluster with adsorbed oxygen
Figure 4.2: A Janin cluster with oxygen adsorbed configuration demonstrating charge
transfer in the cluster
Figure 4.3: A Janin cluster embedded in an fcc Pt lattice
Figure 4.4: Comparison of ∆µ signatures created using different models
8
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
∆-XANES – subtractively normalized XANES
ATR-SEIRAS – attenuated total reflection surface enhanced infrared reflection
absorption spectroscopy
DMFC – direct methanol fuel cell
DRIFTS – diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy
EPOCH – electrochemical promotion of organic chemistry
EXAFS – extended x-ray absorption fine structure
fcc – face centered cubic
FTIR – Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
GDL – gas diffusion layer
hcp – hexagonal close packed
ICE – internal combustion engine
IRAS – infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy
MEA – membrane electrode assembly
MFTIRS – microscopy Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
NASA – national aeronautics and space administration
NEMCA – non-Faradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity
NHE – Normal hydrogen electrode
ORR – oxygen reduction reaction
PEM – polymer electrolyte membrane
PEMFC – polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell
SAXS – small angle x-ray scattering
9
XANES – x-ray absorption near edge structure
XAS – x-ray absorption spectroscopy
10
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 PEM Fuel Cells
There is an immediate need for alternative (renewable, non-fossil fuel) energy
sources due to the unprecedented amount of anthropomorphic carbon dioxide in the
Earth’s atmosphere. Fuel cells are emerging as a key component of an economy based on
renewable energy. A fuel cell is a galvanic electrochemical cell that takes chemical
energy (in the form of a fuel) and converts it into usable electrical energy. This process
of electrochemical conversion is more efficient than the conversion of fuels to
mechanical energy through combustion; an average combustion engine runs at about 1/3
efficiency due to Carnot cycle limitations.1 Fuel cells that use hydrogen and oxygen
(denoted H2/air fuel cells) are of particular interest because the only product formed
through the electrochemical conversion is water. Because they operate at low
temperatures, the electrochemical combustion of fuels does not generate greenhouse
gases or atmospheric pollutants typical of internal combustion engines.
All electrochemical cells work through the coupling of complimentary oxidation-
reduction reactions via an electrolyte. In a H2/air fuel cell, hydrogen is oxidized into two
protons and two electrons at the anode. The protons migrate through the electrolyte to
the cathode, while the electrons travel through the external circuit where they can power
an electrical load on the way to the cathode. The protons, electrons and oxygen from air
combine at the cathode to form water. The combination of the half reactions leads to the
overall cell reaction (equation 1).
11
Equation 1:
2H2 → 4H+ + 4e
- E
0 = 0 V
4e- + 4H
+ + O2 → 2H2O E
0 = 1.23 V
2H2 + O2 → 2H2O Vcell = 1.23 V2
The energy associated with the overall cell reaction is 1.23 V. This is the theoretical
maximum potential the fuel cell can achieve.
One of the most promising types of H2/air fuel cells is the polymer electrolyte
membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). PEMFCs had their major debut as auxiliary power
sources aboard NASA’s Gemini space flights. Today, they are involved in about 90% of
all fuel cell research.3 H2/air PEMFCs have a number of advantages over other fuel cells:
they run at low temperatures, they are relatively lightweight, and they have very high
power densities. These properties make them excellent candidates for portable power
applications, automotive use, and stationary power sources. PEMFCs are unique because
of their polymer electrolyte or proton exchange membrane (PEM). When the hydrogen is
split into two protons at the anode, the protons cross a proton conductive membrane,
usually a sulfonated fluoropolymer such as Nafion, via the Grotthuss hopping
mechanism.4 The Grotthuss hopping mechanism explains the unusually fast diffusion of
protons through a PEM compared that of Brownian motion, which is one reason PEMFCs
are so viable. A fuel cell schematic is shown in Figure 1.1.
12
Figure 1.1: PEMFC Schematic from Liu 2002.5 The Nafion PEM is sandwiched between
the anode and cathode catalysts. Outside of the catalysts are the GDLs and flow fields.
To lower the activation energy of the cell reaction, catalysts are required. The
standard catalyst for both the anode and the cathode in a H2/air fuel cells is carbon
supported platinum (Pt/C), which has platinum nanoparticles dispersed onto activated
carbon particles. The active surface area of Pt/C varies with the amount of platinum, but
with nanometer particle size and good dispersion, it can be as high as 120 m2/g. When
the particle diameter is greater than 2 nm, the active surface area is directly proportional
to the reactivity of the catalyst.3 On average, Pt/C has about three times the specific
activity of unsupported catalysts.6 The disadvantage of platinum as a catalyst is that it is
a very expensive noble metal. Even with the sub-mg/cm2 platinum loadings achievable
with supported catalysts, the cost of a platinum MEA is prohibitive to fuel cell
marketability. The platinum loadings at the cathode side tend to be much larger than the
Hydrogen
fuel
H2O
4e- 4e
-
H+
13
loadings at the anode because of the sluggish electrode kinetics of the oxygen reduction
reaction (ORR). Thus the greatest impact on catalyst loading would result from
improving the ORR kinetics on Pt based catalysts, or finding non precious metal group
catalysts. Thus the primary focus of Department of Energy fuel cell R&D is cathode
catalysis.
Equation 1 shows that the ideal cell voltage of a H2/air fuel cell is 1.23 V;
however, the expected potential is about 1 V at best. Kinetic, ohmic, and mass transport
losses keep the cell from reaching its ideal potential.7 Most of the polarization losses are
attributed to the cathode (> 400 mV) because the hydrogen oxidation overpotential is in
the 10s of millivolts even during high performance. Ohmic losses are due primarily to
the resistance protons encounter as they migrate through the MEA. These losses are
usually associated with imperfect water management.8 Kinetic losses are due to the
activity of the catalyst, and its activation overpotential. Mass transport limitations are
due to the availability of the catalyst active sites, which can be blocked by cathode
flooding or by persistent adsorbates (poisons). Therefore, in addition to researching cost-
effective catalysts, new catalysts that circumvent kinetic and mass transport limitations
are also being explored.
1.2 Operando Spectroscopy
Although many spectroscopy techniques have been applied to the study of fuel
cell electrocatalysts, our approach emphasizes performing spectroscopy under entirely
realistic operating conditions. We call this approach “operando” spectroscopy. Operando
spectroscopy of catalysts is important because it examines the active state of the catalyst,
14
which only exists during catalysis.9 In fuel cells, operando spectroscopy differs from in
situ spectroscopy because it requires entirely realistic operating conditions, including
typical catalyst loadings. High loadings are avoided because they can cause a z-
dependence (normal to the plane of the catalyst layer) in the current and potential
profiles.10, 11
Additionally, the fuel cell is run with normal reactant flow conditions, in the
absence of additional acidic electrolytes (e.g., H2SO4 or HClO4), which is essential if
typical fuel cell operating temperatures are required, and if poisoning by mobile ions is to
be avoided. Although these prerequisites make operando spectroscopy substantially
more challenging than in situ spectroscopy, it allows for the most realistic examination of
the solid-gas catalytic interfaces.
Operando spectroscopy of the solid-gas interface is ideal for examining catalyst
adsorbates. Adsorbates effect dynamic changes on the catalyst surface such as surface
restructuring where surface atoms can be entirely displaced in order to make stronger
surface-adsorbate bonds.12
These changes can be observed, in operando and in situ
spectroscopy, as changes in the vibrational modes of either the surface or the adsorbate
atoms. For example, Shao et al. were able to study the potential dependence of the ORR
intermediates via in situ attenuated total reflection surface enhanced infrared reflection
absorption spectroscopy (ATR-SEIRAS).13, 14
Smith et al. were able to observe potential-
dependent platinum particle growth due to oxide formation and Ostwald ripening with in
situ small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS).15
More common techniques such as Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and XAS are also emerging as powerful tools for
in situ and operando spectroscopy of electrochemical systems.
15
The biggest challenge in performing operando spectroscopy of fuel cells is cell
design. There are restrictions as to what components can be metallic because they can
interfere with XAS if their work function is close to that of the catalyst. The cell should
accommodate both transmission and glancing angle measurements. Fluorescence
measurements obtained at glancing angles mitigate interference due to the other cell
components. In the IR region, most fuel cell materials are completely non-transmissive,
so the operando cell must accommodate special windows to enable reflection techniques.
IR spectroscopy is also sensitive to MEA materials such as the carbon GDL, which
necessitates fabrication of MEA with gas diffusion layers modified to provide access of
the beam to the catalytic surface. Operando spectroscopy of fuel cells requires careful
water management because variable flooding causes fluctuations in the overall system
absorption coefficient. This reduces the amount of data available for signal averaging.
Finally, the cell geometry must accommodate the configuration of the optical components
of the spectrometry system.
1.2.1 Operando XAS
X-ray absorption spectroscopy has grown from a relatively esoteric technique to a
widely used analytical method over the last few decades. This is partially because of the
advancements in x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES), which began in the
1970s. The first of these advancements was the development of synchrotron radiation
that has the ability to provide high intensity, polarized radiation with a wide spectral
range, predictable fluctuations, and small beam divergence.16
Another advancement was
the development of x-ray fluorescence techniques, which occurred after the development
16
of detectors sensitive to this energy range.17
Other advancements include the advent of
computer processing, which enables XAS spectra to be taken in minutes (as opposed to
hours), and the ability to model experimental data theoretically using full multiple
scattering software.16
To perform XAS spectroscopy, x-rays are tuned with a crystalline
monochromator to the work function of the sample. When these x-rays impinge on the
metal surface, a core electron is excited, and ejected as a photoelectron either into the
valence band of the metal (XANES) or into the continuum (EXAFS – x-ray absorption
fine structure).18
This wave is scattered by surrounding atoms creating the XAS
spectrum. The XANES region, within
50 eV of the work function, is most sensitive to changes in oxidation state of the metal
because it looks at multiple scattering events (Fig 1.2a). The EXAFS region of the
spectrum is a powerful analytical technique that can be used to determine the atomic
spacing of a crystal lattice (Fig. 1.2b).19
For H2/air fuel cells, the x-rays are commonly
tuned with a Si (111) crystal monochromator to the platinum LII-III edges at 13.731 and
11.92 keV, respectively.20
These transitions correspond to 2p1/2 or 2p2/3 to 5d
transition.21, 22
17
Figure 1.2: An illustration of the scattering events of XAS. The black spheres represent
absorbing atoms and the white spheres are scattering atoms. a.) the multiple scattering
events that occur in the XANES region; b.) the single scattering event of EXAFS. (From
Agarwal 1991 pg 255)19
Many studies have been done using in situ XAS 22-28
and operando XAS29-35
techniques to study catalyst properties. A few studies were done to look at the oxidation
state of the catalyst metals.29-32
All determined that at fuel cell operating potentials
conditions, platinum is purely metallic. The oxidation of CO was studied both on Pt22, 23
and PtRu27, 28, 33, 34
(the anode catalyst of a direct methanol PEMFC), and the electronic
benefits of ruthenium were exemplified. Finally, adsorption of ORR intermediates was
studied on fuel cell catalysts, and it was found that adsorption is both potential-dependent
and site-specific.25, 26, 33, 36
Subtractively normalized XANES (∆-XANES) is emerging as a new technique
for XANES analysis. 25-27, 33, 34, 37
Delta XANES takes the XANES of the substrate under
adsorbate-free conditions and uses it as a spectroscopic blank for XANES obtained under
conditions conducive to adsorption (e.g., by altering the potential or the chemical
environment). Although the quantitative assessment of these signatures is under debate,
they are excellent for qualitative analysis. The ∆-XANES signatures provide easy-to-
18
interpret spectral features that show smooth variations in intensity as a function of the
desired variable. Using computational software, theoretical ∆-XANES spectra can be
calculated, and used to interpret experimental data.
1.2.2 Operando FTIR
Unlike XAS, which observes the spectra of the catalyst, operando IR studies the
spectra of adsorbates. Operando FTIR allows for the unique properties of adsorbed
species to be clearly observed. Stark tuning is induced by the electrical field formed at
the electrode surface. It can allow forbidden vibrations to be seen in the IR spectra by
inducing a dipole moment in the adsorbed molecule.38, 39
The study of CO adsorption is
particularly important to fuel cells because of its persistence and its detrimental effects on
the catalyst. FTIR allows the site specificity of CO on the crystalline catalyst surface to
be observed via the change in vibrational frequency of the molecule.40-45
CO binds
preferentially to catalyst step sites because the platinum atoms are under coordinated, and
therefore, electron deficient. The terrace sites are only filled after so much CO is
adsorbed that the step sites are full. Finally the potential-dependence this site-specificity
as well as the potential dependence of adsorption configuration (e.g., atop, or bridge) and
total coverage can be seen using in situ FTIR.46-51
The characteristic IR vibrational bands of molecules can also be used to study fuel
cells in situ and in operando. Studies of direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) anodes have
been done to look at the methanol oxidation reaction.52-63
Using FTIR techniques, it is
easy to distinguish between adsorbed methanol, gaseous methanol, and intermediates of
the reduction reaction. In situ FTIR can also be used to study the effects of atmospheric
19
pollutants on the catalytic surface. Quijada et al. used in situ infrared reflection
adsorption spectroscopy (FR-IRRAS) to study the irreversible adsorption of SO2 on
platinum electrodes by looking at its characteristic band at 1220 cm-1
.64-66
Another use of
operando FTIR is to study organic reactions promoted by non-Faradaic electrochemical
modification of catalytic activity (NEMCA) in a fuel cell environment.67-70
Reflectance FTIR techniques must be used to acquire operando spectra because
an IR beam cannot be transmitted through the components of the membrane electrode
assembly housing. A few techniques including diffuse reflection FTIR (sometimes
referred to as DRIFTS), IR reflection absorption spectroscopy (IRAS or IRRAS),
microscope FTIR reflection spectroscopy (MFTIRS), attenuated total reflectance (ATR),
and surface-enhanced IR absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS).71
Diffuse reflectance FTIR
uses a special accessory to the usual FTIR spectrometer. The accessory directs the IR
beam to the sample through a series of mirrors. The beam is then scattered by the sample
and re-combined with an integrating mirror and sent to the detector. Diffuse reflectance
spectra exhibit the same peaks as regular absorbance spectra, but some of the more minor
peaks observed in the absorbance spectra are magnified.72
1.3 Research Objectives
The objectives of this research include development of a versatile operando
spectroscopy fuel cell that enables FTIR and XAS analysis of fuel cell catalytic surfaces
to study the time and potential dependent dynamics of fuel cell catalyst structures.
Chapter 2 discusses the design of the multi-spectroscopic operando fuel cell. Special
considerations were made to design a cell that could be interrogated by transmission
20
XAS, fluorescence XAS and FTIR spectroscopy. Chapter 3 discusses operando XANES
acquired with the new cell. The platinum LII-III edges were examined for changes in
oxidation state. The XANES data were analyzed by ∆-XANES technique for ease of data
trend observations. Chapter 4 discusses theoretical modeling of the operando ∆-XANES
using the full multiple scattering software FEFF8. Two models of platinum cluster
adsorbates were given special attention to show how charge transfer selectively depletes
charge from near neighbor atoms, and how this charge depletion is compensated for by
embedding the cluster into a larger reservoir of Pt atoms. Chapter 5 discusses the future
prospects for operando spectroscopy.
21
CHAPTER 2: OPERANDO CELL DESIGN
2.1 Introduction
Previous operando spectroscopy fuel cells have been reported for FTIR54-56, 73
and
XAS.29-35
There is an advantage to combining the form and functions of the two types of
operando spectroscopic cells. The multi-spectroscopic cell was designed to
accommodate FTIR and XAS studies of the electrode surface of operating fuel cells
membrane electrode assemblies. The advantage of a multi-spectroscopic cell is that
reaction conditions can be duplicated using the exact same electrode surface in either the
FTIR or XAS mode. This enables the acquisition of a diverse range of spectroscopic
information while minimizing the effects of sample variation. The complex humidity-
and air-sensitive parameters required of the fuel cell environment makes this feature
particularly attractive.
Another consideration in the design of the multi-spectroscopic cell was easy
interfacing to the commercially available diffuse reflection accessories for FTIR systems,
and orientation independent operation for easy manipulation in the cramped environment
of synchrotron beamline hutches.
2.1.1 Legacy Cells
Operando spectroscopy cells for fuel cell analysis, developed in the Smotkin lab,
have been extensively reported. Fan et al. designed an operando diffuse IR cell56
(Fig.
2.1a), and Viswanathan et al. designed an operando XAS cell35
(Fig. 2.1b). The Fan cell
was designed to fit into a 1990’s model Harrick Praying Mantis (Pleasantville, NY)
22
diffuse IR accessory. The cell had a number of useful design elements that were helpful
in developing the new cell: the IR window, the flow field design, and the gas inlet/outlet
features.
Figure 2.1: Legacy cells for operando spectroscopy. Top photos: Operando FTIR cell by
Fan et al. The right image is a top-view of the cell, which shows the CaF window. The
left image shows a side-view of the cell, which shows the gas inlets. Bottom photo:
Operando XAS cell by Viswanathan et al. The size of the cell is demonstrated, and the
window that allows spectroscopy is shown.35
The Viswanathan cell incorporated a graphite lower flow field with a posterior
cavity to eliminate signal attenuation in transmission XAS. This feature was integrated
into the new design. The new cell design was also built to optimize the fluorescence
XAS mode in addition to transmission mode, which would eliminate signal attenuation
due to travel length entirely. The new cell incorporated many design features from the
legacy cells, building upon their strengths, and improving their weaknesses.
2.2 Multi-Spectroscopic Cell
The new cell, show
transmission XAS, and fluorescence XAS (
fluorescence XAS mode, the top plate can be removed so that only the windowed
graphite
Figure 2.2: New multi-spectroscopic cell for operando spectroscopy. Top photo: Cell
disassembled. The top piece is the housing slider. The midd
contains the lower flow field, upper flow field, and the top plate. The bottom row
contains an MEA. Bottom photo: Assembled cell.
upper flow field is between the beam and the MEA. This is advantageous because the
stainless steel top contains iron, nickel and chromium
are similar to the edge energies of the catalyst components.
fluorescence XAS is that beam intensity is not attenuated by
material. The use of graphite flow fields (black plates in
lower flow field beneath the MEA
either mode of operation.
bevel on the underside to allow for transmission XAS to be
(Fig. 2.4).
Spectroscopic Cell Design Features
shown in Figure 2.2, enables operando diffuse reflectance FTIR,
transmission XAS, and fluorescence XAS (Fig. 2.3) of fuel cell catalytic layers
mode, the top plate can be removed so that only the windowed
spectroscopic cell for operando spectroscopy. Top photo: Cell
disassembled. The top piece is the housing slider. The middle row from left to right
contains the lower flow field, upper flow field, and the top plate. The bottom row
contains an MEA. Bottom photo: Assembled cell.
upper flow field is between the beam and the MEA. This is advantageous because the
contains iron, nickel and chromium, which fluoresce at energies that
are similar to the edge energies of the catalyst components. The advantage of
orescence XAS is that beam intensity is not attenuated by the lower flow field
The use of graphite flow fields (black plates in Figure 2.3), and recessing the
lower flow field beneath the MEA (in a similar fashion to the Viswanathan cell)
. To accommodate transmission XAS, the slider has a wide
l on the underside to allow for transmission XAS to be recorded at an
23
operando diffuse reflectance FTIR,
talytic layers. In
mode, the top plate can be removed so that only the windowed
spectroscopic cell for operando spectroscopy. Top photo: Cell
le row from left to right
contains the lower flow field, upper flow field, and the top plate. The bottom row
upper flow field is between the beam and the MEA. This is advantageous because the
, which fluoresce at energies that
The advantage of
the lower flow field graphite
), and recessing the
(in a similar fashion to the Viswanathan cell), enables
accommodate transmission XAS, the slider has a wide
an optimum angle
24
Figure 2.3 Illustrated exploded view of the cell. The red arrow represents the beam path
of reflectance FTIR or fluorescence XAS modes. The yellow arrow represents
transmission XAS mode.
A compact cell design is required because the beamline hutch is densely packed
with equipment. In the air-breathing fluorescence XAS mode, the cell is operated on its
side (Fig. 2.4), which can cause water droplets to form and pool at the bottom of the flow
field. Wicking material is used on the upper flow field to remove water formed at the
cathode by the ORR. Although the flow fields have no set polarity, these studies have
used the upper flow field as the cathode, which is most prone to the effects of flooding.
Figure 2.4: Photo of the cell in line at Argonne National Laboratory. The cell must be
operated on its side to accommodate the x-ray beam path.
25
For FTIR, the slider design allows for easy alignment below the integrating
mirrors of a Pike Technologies (Madison, WI) diffusIR accessory (Fig. 2.6). The original
accessory was designed so that the sample holder slides into position under the
integrating mirror. The cell design integrated this feature by including a housing slider
that easily aligned the cell in the accessory. The slider assembly incorporates wiring for
temperature and potentiostatic control, as well as manifolding for the reactant gases.
Swagelok fittings for of gas entry and exhaust, and a DE9 plug for potentiostatic and
temperature control are positioned at a terminal end of the slider for ease of insertion into
the commercially available diffuse refection accessory. The wide bevel angle of 158º on
the top plate maximizes the collection of the scattered signal. The upper flow field
employs a pins style-flow field to optimize flow distribution around the CaF2 window
inset. The wicking is still effective at controlling flooding in the upright operation mode
for FTIR, which is especially important in the water-sensitive IR region.
Figure 2.5: Photo of the cell interface with an FTIR. The cell is aligned within the Pike
diffusIR accessory, which connects to a Bruker (Billerica, MA) Vertex 70 FTIR
Spectrometer.
26
2.3 Experimental
Polarization curves were obtained with an EZstat potentiostat/galvanostat
(NuVant Systems, Inc. Crown Point, IN). The cell was operated as a H2/air fuel cell with
an air-breathing cathode at 50 oC with humidified gases. The membrane electrode
assembly (MEA) was prepared using standard procedures.74
The cathode side was
loaded with 30% PtNi/C acid washed E-Tek catalyst (special made E1030523) at 0.9
mg/cm2. The anode side was prepared with Pd/C Alfa Aesar catalyst (stock # 38309, lot #
C02R014) using a 1.0 mg/cm2 loading. Palladium was used on the anode because its L
edge energy is much lower than that of Pt and its K edge is twice as large as the Pt LII-III
edge that was being studied. The Ni K edge is so low that it enables separate
examination of Pt and Ni atoms.
The operando XAS were acquired at Advanced Photon Source (Argonne National
Laboratory, IL) at the MRCAT beamline 10-ID-B. The cell was aligned for fluorescence
mode between the source and the Lytle detector (Fig. 2.3). The operando spectra were
collected by tuning the beamline undulator to the Pt LIII edge energy range using the 2nd
harmonic of a Si (111) crystal monochromator. Higher harmonics were rejected using a
Rh reflection mirror. The incident ion chamber was filled with N2 gas.
2.4 Results and Discussion
A polarization curve was acquired after conditioning the cell for about an hour
(Fig. 2.6). The sweep shows hysteresis that is commonly observed during fuel cell cyclic
voltammetry. The return anodic sweep shows that cell performance is regained after
surface oxides are reduced.
27
Figure 2.6: Polarization curve obtained with the multi-spectroscopic cell.
Operando fluorescence XAS acquired with the new cell showed a step
improvement in signal-to-noise over the Viswanathan cell in transmission mode with
similar catalyst loadings, as exemplified by the Ni and Pt edge data of a PtNi catalyst
(Fig. 2.7). The nickel edge data shows a much cleaner EXAFS spectral region and the
absence of observable pre-edge noise. At the Pt edge, the difference in signal-to-noise
ratio is not as distinct, but there is less fluctuation in the EXAFS region. The improved
spectral quality is due to the use of the new fuel cell’s fluorescence-mode.
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
-35-30-25-20-15-10-50
Po
ten
tia
l (m
V)
Current (mA)
28
Figure 2.7: Comparison of XAS data acquired with the Viswanathan cell (red line) and
data acquired with the new multi-spectroscopic cell (green line). a.) Ni K edge of the
Pt3Ni cathode. b.) Pt LIII edge Pt3Ni cathode.
29
2.5 Conclusions
This work has demonstrated a new operando multi-spectroscopic fuel cell capable
of diffuse reflectance FTIR, fluorescence XAS, and transmission XAS. The cell was
operated under normal operating conditions and a standard polarization curve was
acquired. Fluorescence XAS data shows a significant decrease in signal noise compared
to the previous operando transmission XAS cell. The Ni K edge demonstrates that the
increased signal-to-noise ratio is more dramatic at lower energies. More operando
catalyst studies with this cell are sure to come.
30
CHAPTER 3: TIME- AND POTENTIAL-DEPENDENT ∆-XANES
3.1 Introduction
Fuel cell degradation can be ascribed to short-term and long-term degradation
modes.75
Our previous work has shown that in both cases, adsorption plays a key role.
For example in the case of direct methanol fuel cells, it has been shown that the anode is
highly susceptible to adverse adsorbates such as CO. The poisoning of an electrode
surface by CO occurs on a very short time scale. Recovery has been effected by fuel
starvation of the anode, which causes a positive excursion of the electrode potential that
oxidatively cleans the surface.75
There are also longer term degradation modes that occur
over periods of hours to hundreds of hours. The degradation of direct methanol fuel cell
cathodes exemplifies long term degradation modes. This includes time-dependent
poisoning of the cathode by Ru crossover from the anode, and deep oxide formation and
passivation of the cathode.75-79
The study of time-dependent degradation processes can
most effectively be studied by operando spectroscopy.9, 29, 32, 35, 55, 56, 73
The ability to monitor the time- and potential-dependence of oxygen adsorbates
on cathode catalysts is important because of their inevitable formation over the life of the
cell. Oxides cause detrimental kinetic and mass transfer losses, thus an understanding of
their persistence is essential to better catalyst design. Smith et al. recently studied Pt
growth due to oxides and Ostwald ripening with in situ SAXS.15
A number of other
studies have been done using in situ XAS 25-27, 31, 36
and operando XAS 29, 30, 32-34
techniques to study fuel cell catalysts. Towards this end, the multi-spectroscopic cell was
taken to a synchrotron source to acquire high-quality operando fluorescence XAS data.
31
These spectra were analyzed by the ∆-XANES technique for the easiest observation of
oxide trends.
3.2 Experimental
The cell was operated as an air-breathing H2/air cell. The membrane electrode
assembly (MEA) was prepared using standard procedures.74
The cathode side was loaded
with 20% Pt/C Alfa Aesar catalyst (HiSpec 3000 stock # 35849, lot # A305023) at 1.2
mg/cm2. The anode side was prepared with Pd/C Alfa Aesar catalyst (stock # 38309, lot #
C02R014) using a 1.0 mg/cm2 loading. The cell was operated at 50
oC with humidified
gases. Polarization curves were obtained with an EZstat potentiostat (NuVant Systems,
Inc. Crown Point, IN). The cathode was left open to enable the collection of high quality
XAS in fluorescence mode with no signal attenuation.
Pt LIII edge XAS data were collected at the MRCAT 10-ID-B beamline at the
Advanced Photon Source (Argonne National Laboratory, IL). The beamline undulator
was tuned to the Pt LIII edge energy range using the 2nd
harmonic of the Si (111)
monochromator crystal. A Rh reflection mirror was used to reject higher harmonics. The
incident ion chamber was filled with N2. XAS data were collected at different fuel cell
potentials: 0 mV (short circuit), 530, 600, 710, 780, 820, 900 mV vs. NHE, and at open
circuit voltage (OCV). The cell was held at each potential for about 2 hours while 32
scans were run. In addition, ex situ XAS data were collected on a similarly prepared dry
MEA unexposed to the fuel cell humidified environment.
32
3.3 Results and Discussion
3.3.1 Time-dependent ∆-XANES
After the cell is conditioned29, 35
for 1 hour, a reference XANES was obtained at 0
volts versus a normal hydrogen electrode (NHE). Time-dependent XAS were then
acquired and subtractively normalized to the reference spectrum to yield ∆µ fingerprints.
Figure 3.1 shows time dependent fingerprints acquired at 530 mV. The fingerprints are
the running average of three consecutive scans (Fig. 3.1). These initial cathode spectra
demonstrate the time-dependence of a peak at about 11568 eV. The time dependence is
likely related to a variety of time constants, including surface and sub-surface catalyst
restructuring induced by adsorption/desorption of oxygen. The fingerprint peak is
observed to decrease in magnitude as the potential is held constant. This is coincident
with the fact that 530 mV is a reducing potential for platinum oxide. The observed time
constant is on the order of hours, which is much longer than expected for simple surface
oxide reduction. The reduction of sub-surface oxygen species, which have been
incorporated into the platinum lattice, may be responsible for the long time constant. To
our knowledge, this is the first instance of time-dependent operando XAS of a fuel cell.
33
Figure 3.1 Time-dependent operando fluorescence XAS fingerprints highlighting an
oxide peak at 11568 eV.
3.3.2 Potential-dependent ∆-XANES
The fingerprint obtained at 204 minutes was used as the lowest potential plot in
the potential dependent data of Fig. 3.2. The rest of the potential-dependent signatures
are running averages of 30 scans taken at the given voltages. The peak shown at 11568
eV is the same oxide peak shown in the time-dependent signatures (Fig. 3.1). As the
potential was increased from 600 – 900 mV, the signature oxide peak increased. At
OCV, the peak intensity increased dramatically. The ex situ dry MEA signature shows
that the cathode is completely oxidized before exposure to the fuel cell environment,
consistent with the results of Stoupin et al.80
11550 11560 11570 11580 11590 11600Energy eV
530 mV vs Time
84 mins
96 mins
108 mins
120 mins
144 mins
168 mins
204 mins
34
Figure 3.2: Potential-dependent operando fluorescence XAS fingerprints highlighting an
oxide peak at 11568 eV.
The potential-dependent data shows a negative dip at about 11564 eV that evolves
at 780, 820, and 900 mV. This negative dip has been hypothesized to be a manifestation
of the ligand effect, which is the withdrawal of electron density from nearby atoms due to
adsorption of an electronegative atom or molecule.81
Charge transfer can shift a XANES
edge to higher energy if there is charge depletion. Therefore, when a reference spectrum
is subtracted from a blue-shifted spectrum, the result is a negative dip in the ∆-XANES
signatures.
However, this negative dip should be interpreted with caution. There are inherent
errors in creating accurate ∆µ fingerprints. To create reproducible fingerprints, the
reference and sample spectra need to be reproducibly aligned within 0.01 eV.
Furthermore, the Si (111) crystal monochromator that controls the beam frequency is
only accurate to ± 0.01 eV. Consequently, even if two experimental spectra could be
accurately and reproducibly aligned to 0.01 eV, the error inherent in the data is too large.
11550 11560 11570 11580 11590 11600Energy eV
Potential vs Energy
530 mV - 204 min
600 mV
710 mV
780 mV
820 mV
900 mV
ocv
dry
35
The manifestation of this error in not equally distributed through the whole spectrum, the
greatest impact is in the lower energy region of the signatures (Fig. 3.3).
Figure 3.3: The error distribution through a ∆µ fingerprint. Error is represented by the
shaded area.
3.4 Conclusions
Excellent quality operando fluorescence XAS has been acquired with high signal-
to-noise ratios using a new operando spectroscopy cell. The time-dependent data,
obtained with the cell, elucidates a time constant for surface and sub-surface oxide
removal that is on the order of hours. XAS taken at increasing potentials exhibit an
increase in the magnitude of the oxide peak. The potential-dependent spectra also exhibit
a negative dip prior to the oxide peak, which could be the manifestation of the ligand
effect. However, alignment errors in XANES and instrumental uncertainty in XAS
instrumentation make the analysis of fine structure fingerprint features challenging.
36
CHAPTER 4: THEORETICAL MODELING OF ∆-XANES SPECTRA
4.1 Introduction
The potential-dependence of adsorbate coverages on a distribution of sites is
likely the most important determining factor in electrocatalysis. An important example is
the ORR. The sluggishness of the ORR kinetics is the primary barrier to the
commercialization of PEMFCs. Diffusing dioxygen must compete with mobile anions
and tenaciously adsorbed oxygen for free Pt sites. The competition with mobile anions
can be mitigated by using electrolytes with anchored anions, such as Nafion.82
The
competition with tenaciously adsorbed oxygen is a more difficult issue. A strategy for
improving ORR catalysts is the alteration of the electronic band structure (by alloying) to
increase the Pt oxidation potential.83-88
A number of mixed metal catalysts have been
studied as alloys and more recently as core shell structures. Model systems such as Pt
skin alloys suggest that the key issue is electronic structure, with no need for alloying
components on the surface.89-91
De-alloying of Pt alloys is another strategy.92-97
The
experimental ORR work has been complemented with computational modeling based
primarily on cluster or periodic density functional theory (DFT).98-111
Oxygen adsorption is an elementary step in anode fuel cell reactions as well. In
DMFCs, oxygen adsorption is required for the bifunctional methanol oxidation
mechanism.112-114
Although Pt, a good C-H activator, oxidatively adsorbs methanol to
yield adsorbed CO, it cannot provide the oxygen required for complete oxidation to CO2
within the practical DMFC anode potential window (200 – 350 mV vs. NHE). Thus
practical DMFC anode catalysts are binary or ternary alloy systems where the alloying
37
components chemisorb oxygen at lower potentials (e.g., Os, Ru, W, etc). 47, 112-118
In spite
of a massive collective effort, the improvements in both anode and cathode kinetics over
the past few decades have been incremental. Much of the improvements can be attributed
to better preparative methods for MEAs.
The ability analyze adsorption site coverage dependencies is fundamental to
understanding electrocatalysis. Towards that end subtractively normalized x-ray
absorption near edge spectroscopy (∆-XANES) has been under development for analysis
of site-specific adsorption in a variety of electrochemical systems.24-27, 33, 34, 119
The
XANES of the substrate under adsorbate-free conditions is used as a subtraction standard
for XANES obtained under conditions conducive to adsorption (e.g., by altering the
potential or chemical environment). The challenge is interpretation of the experimental
∆-XANES (∆µ fingerprints). Ramaker uses theoretical XANES of model clusters such
as the Pt6 Janin cluster120
(Fig. 4.1), with and without adsorbates, to calculate theoretical
∆µ fingerprints (∆µ signatures).24-27, 33, 34, 119
Figure 4.1: Janin cluster with adsorbed oxygen. Clockwise from top left: atop adsorption,
bridged adsorption, hexagonal close-packed (hcp) adsorption, and face-centered cubic
(fcc) adsorption.
0 1
2 3
4 5
0 1
2 3
4 5
0 1
2 3
4 5 54
2 3
10
38
The 6-atom Janin cluster is an ideal model because it can accommodate all four oxygen
absorption sites: atop, bridged, fcc, and hcp.120
The ∆µ signatures are calculated using
FEFF8, a full multiple scattering code that employs self-consistent-field calculations of
local electronic structure.121, 122
To date, the Ramaker ∆µ signatures for oxygen
adsorption have been limited to the scattering of photoelectrons originating from only one
adsorbing Pt atom (atom-0 in Fig.4.1?).24, 26, 33
However, Ankudinov et al.123
showed that
changes in the near neighbor Pt-scattering potentials due to adsorbate-Pt bonds (i.e.,
changes in the Pt electronic structure) are sometimes more important than the effect of Pt-
adsorbate photoelectron multiple scattering. For example, the Pauling electronegativity
value for oxygen is 1.3 units larger than for Pt. Thus charge transfer from the Pt lattice to
the adsorbate oxygen would be expected. The withdrawal of electrons from near
neighbor Pt atoms should cause a blue shift in their respective XANES spectra. Such blue
shifts would be manifested as a negative dip at the low energy side of the ∆-XANES. In
order to account for the ligand effect, 81, 124
our first iteration in the development of a
more meaningful signature involved the inclusion of x-ray absorption events from all of
the atoms of the Janin cluster. These signatures are referred to as all-atoms signatures.
The metallic cluster has delocalized electrons that can participate in charge
transfer during modification of the cluster chemical environment (e.g., adsorption
processes) (Fig. 4.2).
39
Figure 4.2 A Janin cluster with oxygen adsorbed in the atop configuration. The orange
arrows represent the direction of charge transfer through the cluster.
Since XAS probes all atoms in the cluster, the photoelectrons from all of the adsorbate-
free Pt atoms and adsorbing atoms, should be included in the ∆µ calculations (i.e., all-
atoms model). However, the use of isolated Janin cluster atoms for an all-atoms model of
oxygen adsorption overemphasizes Pt charge depletion of the Janin cluster atoms because
they are artificially under-coordinated. A more realistic model would result from
embedding the Janin cluster within a larger reservoir of Pt atoms. This work shows how
progressive improvement of the ∆µ signatures models (i.e., from the limited-absorber
model of Ramaker, to an all-atoms model, and finally to an embedded-all-atoms model)
elucidates the importance of charge transfer effects induced by the adsorbate. Moreover
the analysis of the isolated all-atoms model provides insights into the relative
contribution to charge transfer from each Janin cluster atoms. That information is masked
by charge compensation from the Pt-reservoir in the embedded-all-atoms model. Thus
observations extracted from progressively increasing the number of atoms contributing
0 1
2 3
4 5
40
photoelectrons (i.e., from limited-absorber atom model to the embedded all-atoms-model)
contribute to the understanding of the ligand effect.
4.2 Methods
4.2.1 Janin all-atoms signatures
All-atoms signatures were computed for the atop and bridged adsorption
configurations using FEFF8, a full multiple scattering code.125
The XANES for the
adsorbate-free cluster and adsorption configurations were computed on a per-atom
basis (0-5 Fig. 4.1). These simulated XANES were used to calculate per-atom ∆µ
signatures, which could be averaged without weighting or configurationally averaged
to yield isolated all-atoms signatures. The criteria for the method of averaging will be
discussed later.
4.2.2 Embedded all-atoms signatures
When the atop-adsorbed Janin cluster is embedded into the fcc Pt reservoir, the
cluster symmetry is increased to C4v with the Pt – O bond as the C4 axis (Fig. 4.3).126
The
C4 operation creates four equivalent atom-1 sites about atom-0, and atom-2, -3, -4, and -5
(the subsurface atoms) become equivalent. The increased symmetry allows for
reassignment of the six available FEFF8 potentials to accommodate atoms of the Pt
reservoir. Four unique potentials are distributed between the oxygen, atom-0, the atom-
1s, and the subsurface atoms. The final two potentials are assigned to the reservoir. Each
of the four non-reservoir (Janin atoms) potentials yields a per-atom signature. The per-
atom signatures of a cluster configuration are configurationally averaged to yield an
41
embedded all-atom signature. The configurational average weights the per-atom
signatures by the multiplicity generated by relevant symmetry operations (i.e., the atom-1
per-atom signature and the subsurface atom signatures are both weighted by four because
their rotation about the C4 axis).
Figure 4.3: A Janin cluster embedded in an fcc Pt lattice
The bridged adsorption configuration yields a C2v symmetry upon insertion into
the Pt reservoir. The σv plane bisects the oxygen, atom-3, and atom-5. The σv reflection
makes atom-1 and -0 equivalent. Additionally, atom-2 and -4 have equal counterparts
opposite of the plane. The σv´ plane bisects the oxygen, atom-1, and atom-0. Reflection
through the σv´ plane equates the atom-2s to the atom-4s, and atom-3 to atom-5. As
before, per-atom signatures are generated from the unique potentials of atom-0/1s, atom-
2/4s, and atom-3/5s. Configurational-averaging weights atoms-2/4 by four, atoms-3/5 by
two, and atoms-1/0 by two as per the relevant symmetry operations.
4.3 Results & Discussion
Figure 4.4a shows the isolated per-atom ∆µ signatures for the atop (top) and
42
bridged (bottom) adsorption configurations. The atom-0 ∆µ signatures for the atop
and bridged configurations (dotted blue lines) correspond to the Teliska limited-
absorber signatures, which only consider x-ray photoelectrons from atom-0.26
The
primary effect of atop oxygen adsorption is an increase in the white line of the
adsorbing atom-0. There is a slight increase in edge absorption of atoms-2, -4, -3 and
-5. The slight increase in absorption in the atom-1 ∆µ signature will be discussed in
the context of the embedded-atop ∆µ signatures. The lower panel of Fig. 4.4a shows
the per-atom ∆µ signatures for bridged oxygen adsorption on the isolated Janin
cluster. In the bridged configuration atoms-2, -4, -3, and -5 exhibit a negative dip on
the low-energy side of the peak. This is a manifestation of the ligand effect. These
atoms experience substantial charge depletion upon adsorption of oxygen over atom-0
and -1. This causes the blue-shift in the XANES that is responsible for the negative
dip in the ∆µ signature. Negative dips are a direct consequence of a ligand effect. It
is noteworthy that the atom-0 and atom-1 signatures are not exactly the same. This
would be better discussed in the context of the embedded clusters, where the atom-0
and atom-1 signatures are exactly identical.
Figure 4.4b compares the embedded per-atom ∆µ signatures of the atop (top
panel) and bridged (lower panel) configurations. The atop atom-0 signature intensity
decreases significantly when the cluster is exposed to the Pt reservoir electron density.
Atoms-2, -4, -3, and -5 exhibit no change in the XANES, relative to the clean cluster,
upon atop adsorption. The embedded atom-1 atop signature is similar to that of the
isolated atom-1 atop signature except that the negative dip and the high intensity region
are more sharply defined. The well-defined negative dip in the embedded signature
43
suggests that the Pt reservoir is unable to fully charge-compensate surface atoms in
proximity to the adsorbing atom. In the embedded-bridged configuration, atoms-2, -4, -3,
and -5, now subsurface atoms, are almost completely charge-compensated (i.e., atoms-
3/5 still shows a small negative dip) by the reservoir electron density. The signatures of
atom-1 and atom-0 are now exactly the same, as would be predicted by increased
symmetry of the embedded cluster.
Figure 4.4c compares the configurational averages of the embedded (solid lines)
and isolated (dashed lines) signatures for both adsorption configurations. In the atop-
embedded signature, peak intensity is substantially decreased relative to the isolated
cluster: The subsurface-atom embedded signatures contribute no intensity to the
weighted average. It is noteworthy that the atom-1 charge depletion is completely
masked by the magnitude of the atom-0 signature intensity. However, the higher-energy
peak in the atom-1 signature is more prominent in the configurationally averaged
embedded signature. That peak appears as a shoulder in the configurationally averaged
isolated-cluster signature. In the bridge configuration, all of the charge depletion that
results from charge transfer from atoms-2, -3, -4, and -5, are completely compensated for
when those atoms are made subsurface by embedding the cluster. The negative dip in the
isolated signature disappears completely, the signature intensity is decreased, and the
profile is dominated by the atom-0/1 signature.
44
Figure 4.4a: Isolated per-atom signatures. Top: Signatures obtained with the atop
configuration; Bottom: Signatures obtained with the bridged configuration.
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
-20 0 20Energy (eV)
Isolated Bridged
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
-20 0 20Energy (eV)
Isolated Atop
45
Figure 4.4b: Embedded per-atom signatures. Top: Signatures obtained with the atop
configuration; Bottom: Signatures obtained with the bridged configuration.
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
-20 0 20Energy (eV)
Embedded Bridged
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
-20 0 20Energy (eV)
Embedded Atop
46
Figure 4.4c: Configurational averages of the per-atom signatures – dashed lines are
isolated all-atoms signatures, solid lines are embedded all-atoms. Top: Signatures
obtained with the atop configuration; Bottom: Signatures obtained with the bridged
configuration.
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
-20 -10 0 10 20 30
Energy (eV)
Atop: Isolated vs. Embedded
configurationally averaged
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
-20 -10 0 10 20 30
Energy (eV)
Bridged: Isolated vs. Embedded
configurationally averaged
47
4.4 Conclusions
Limited-absorber ∆µ modeling precludes the ability to sense charge transfer
effects concomitant with adsorption. Adsorbed oxygen on a Pt6 Janin cluster modifies
the x-ray absorption properties of the adsorbate-free Pt atoms. ∆µ signatures calculated
on per-atom basis show that all Pt-atom photoelectrons must be included in FEFF8
simulations if charge transfer effects are to be modeled. Although the isolated Janin all-
atoms signatures overemphasize charge depletion (because Janin atoms are under-
coordinated relative bulk Pt atoms) they do determine the per-atom contributions to
charge transfer. Overemphasis of charge depletion can be mitigated by embedding the
Janin cluster into a larger reservoir of Pt atoms. The embedded per-atom ∆µ signatures
demonstrate that only the surface atom-1 in the atop configuration remains charge
depleted after change compensation from the Pt reservoir. All of the charge depletion
resulting from charge transfer effects from sub-surface atoms is compensated for by the
Pt reservoir. Thus this work shows how the progressive improvement of the signature
models, from the limited-absorber model of Ramaker, to an all-atoms model, and finally
to an embedded-all-atoms model, elucidates the importance of charge transfer effects
induced by the adsorbate. Moreover the analysis of the all-atoms model provides insight
into the source of charge transfer from near neighbor atoms, which are masked by charge
compensation from the Pt-reservoir electron density as evidenced by the embedded all-
atoms model.
48
CHAPTER 5: FUTURE DIRECTIONS – OPERANDO FTIR
5.1 Poisoning Studies
5.1.1 Introduction
In order for H2/air fuel cells to be a viable option for automotive power sources,
they need to be able to withstand the dynamic environment of the roadway. Assuming
that fuel cells will be gradually phased into to automotive power, they will
simultaneously be on the road with internal combustion engines (ICEs). Consequently,
even though H2/air fuel cells are clean forms of energy, they will be subject to a number
of air pollutants formed by ICEs such as NOx and SOx gases.
In situ voltammetric studies have shown these pollutants to have detrimental
effects on the performance of H2/air fuel cells.127-134
In situ FTIR studies show that SO2 is
irreversibly adsorbed onto platinum catalysts in aqueous solutions.64-66
However, the
effect of these contaminants have never been studied in a fuel cell by operando
techniques. These gases, and their reduction intermediates have distinct vibrational
modes in the IR region,20
which make them excellent candidates for study with the multi-
spectroscopic cell by diffuse reflectance FTIR. The fingerprints of the adsorbed species
and their reduction intermediates will enable mechanistic analysis of how these poisons
adversely affect fuel cell performance.
5.1.2 Hypothesis and objectives
Based on the results of operando CO adsorption studies, it is hypothesized that
there will be potential and site-specific coverage dependence of these adsorbates. It will
49
be interesting to see if SOx and NOx are adsorbed preferentially to CO or other common
poisons. Examination of the potential dependence of the adsorbates, in tandem with fuel
cell performance analysis, will provide information as to how adsorbate coverages affect
performance. An understanding of these adsorption mechanisms is required if successful
mitigation strategies are to be developed.
5.2 Epoxide Ring Opening with EPOCH
5.2.1 Introduction
The non-Faradaic electronic promotion of organic chemistry (EPOCH) is an ideal
catalytic system for epoxide ring-opening reactions, which represent an ideal synthetic
route to a number of pharmaceutical building blocks. EPOCH conversion of epoxides to
aldehydes and ketones provides a form of “green” chemistry in that atom efficiency is
enhanced compared to conventional syntheses (e.g., the oxidative cleavage of alkenes).
Moreover, solid polymer electrolytes obviate the need for liquid solvent waste disposals.
EPOCH occurs by a proton-spillover mechanism: hydrogen oxidized at the anode of a
PEM cell yields protons that migrate through the MEA to the cathode. The protons
spillover onto the cathode catalyst surface and become co-adsorbates with the target
organic reactants. The spillover protons have sufficient lifetime to catalyze isomerization
of the adsorbate; a transistor-like base current of spillover protons amplifies organic
transformations at the cathode.67-70
50
5.2.2 Hypothesis and objectives
The multi spectroscopy cell will be utilized to monitor EPOCH conversion of
epoxide ring-opening reactions via operando FTIR. Previous studies have examined
EPOCH reactions through the use of in-line spectroscopy techniques to monitor the
reaction effluent.67, 69
These reactions are excellent candidates to be studied via operando
FTIR because the reactants are adsorbed on the surface, reduced by spillover protons and
then desorbed. Each of these steps will have a unique fingerprint in the FTIR spectra.
The efficiency of the reaction can then be measured as a function of potential.
Furthermore, the reaction intermediates can be studied, elucidating the multi-step
reduction.
51
REFERENCES
1. Gilbert, T.; Kirss, R.; Foster, N.; Davies, G., Chemistry: The Science in Context.
Second ed.; W.W Norton & Company: New York, 2009.
2. Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R., Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and
Applications. Second Edition ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2001; p 833.
3. Barbir, F., PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice. Elsevier: 2005.
4. Agmon, N., The Grotthuss mechanism. Chemical Physics Letters 1995, 244,
(5,6), 456-62.
5. Liu, R.; Smotkin, E., Array membrane electrode assemblies for high throughput
screening of direct methanol fuel cell anode catalysts. Journal of Electroanalytical
Chemistry 2002, 535, 49-55.
6. Liu, L.; Pu, C.; Viswanathan, B.; Fan, Q.; Liu, R.; Smotkin, E., Carbon supported
and unsupported Pt-Ru anodes for liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochimica
Acta 1998, 43, (24), 3657-3663.
7. Srinivasan, S., Fuel Cells: From Fundamentals to Applications. Springer Science:
New York, 2006.
8. Zawodzinski, T. A., Jr.; Derouin, C.; Radzinski, S.; Sherman, R. J.; Smith, V. T.;
Springer, T. E.; Gottesfeld, S., Water uptake by and transport through Nafion 117
membranes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 1993, 140, (4), 1041-7.
9. Topsoe, H., Developments in operando studies and in situ characterization of
heterogeneous catalysts. Journal of Catalysis 2003, 216, (1-2), 155-164.
10. Bernardi, D. M.; Verbrugge, M. W., A mathematical model of the solid-polymer-
electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 1992, 139, (9), 2477-91.
11. Dawn M. Bernardi, M. W. V., Mathematical model of a gas diffusion electrode
bonded to a polymer electrolyte. AIChE Journal 1991, 37, (8), 1151-1163.
52
12. Somorjai, G. A., Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis. John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, 1994.
13. Shao, M. H.; Adzic, R. R., Spectroscopic Identification of the Reaction
Intermediates in Oxygen Reduction on Gold in Alkaline Solutions. Journal of Physical
Chemistry B 2005, 109, (35), 16563-16566.
14. Shao, M.-h.; Liu, P.; Adzic, R. R., Superoxide Anion is the Intermediate in the
Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Platinum Electrodes. Journal of the American Chemical
Society 2006, 128, 7408-7409.
15. Smith, M. C.; Gilbert, J. A.; Mawdsley, J. R.; Seifert, S.; Myers, D. J., In Situ
Small-Angle Scattering Observation of Pt Catalyst Particle Growth During Potential
Cycling. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2008, 130, (26), 8112-8113.
16. Andrews, P. T.; Collins, I. R.; Dose, V.; Fink, J.; Fuggle, J. C.; Godby, R. W.;
Inglesfield, J. E.; Schneider, R.; Somers, J.; Vvedensky, D. D.; Zaanen, J.; Zeller, R.,
Unoccupied Electronic States. Springer-Verlag: 1992; Vol. 69.
17. Stohr, J., NEXAFS Spectroscopy. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1992; p 403.
18. Fay, M. J.; Proctor, A.; Hoffmann, D. P.; Hercules, D. M., Unraveling EXAFS
spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 1988, 60, (21), 1225A-1226A, 1228A, 1230A-
1234A, 1236A-1238A, 1240A-1243A.
19. Agarwal, B. K., X-Ray Spectroscopy. Second ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1991.
20. Patnaik, P., Dean's Analytical Chemistry Handobook. Second ed.; McGraw-Hill:
New York, 2004.
21. Neutron and X-ray Specroscopy. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006.
22. Singh, J.; Tromp, M.; Safonova, O. V.; Glatzel, P.; Bokhoven, J. A. v., In Situ
XAS with High-Energy Resolution: The Changing Structure of Platinum During the
Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide. Catalysis Today 2009, in press.
53
23. Maniguet, S.; Mathew, R. J.; Russell, A. E., EXAFS of carbon monoxide
oxidation on supported Pt fuel cell electrocatalysts. Journal of Physical Chemistry B
2000, 104, (9), 1998-2004.
24. Teliska, M.; O'Grady, W. E.; Ramaker, D. E., Determination of O and OH
Adsorption Sites and Coverage in Situ on Pt Electrodes from Pt L2-3 X-ray Absorption
Spectroscopy. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2005, 109, (16), 8076-8084.
25. Teliska, M.; O'Grady, W. E.; Ramaker, D. E., Determination of H Adsorption
Sites on Pt/C Electrodes in HClO4 from Pt L2-3 X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Journal
of Physical Chemistry B 2004, 108, (7), 2333-2344.
26. Teliska, M.; Murthi, V. S.; Mukerjee, S.; Ramaker, D. E., Site-Specific vs
Specific Adsorption of Anions on Pt and Pt-Based Alloys. Journal of Physical Chemistry
C 2007, 111, (26), 9267-9274.
27. Scott, F. J.; Mukerjee, S.; Ramaker, D. E., CO Coverage/Oxidation Correlated
with PtRu Electrocatalyst Particle Morphology in 0.3 M Methanol by In Situ XAS.
Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2007, 154, (5), A396-A406.
28. Russell, A. E.; Maniguet, S.; Mathew, R. J.; Yao, J.; Roberts, M. A.; Thompsett,
D., In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction of fuel cell
electrocatalysts. Journal of Power Sources 2001, 96, (1), 226-232.
29. Viswanathan, R.; Hou, G.; Liu, R.; Bare, S. R.; Modica, F.; Mickelson, G.; Segre,
C. U.; Leyarovska, N.; Smotkin, E. S., In-Situ XANES of Carbon-Supported Pt-Ru
Anode Electrocatalyst for Reformate-Air Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. Journal of
Physical Chemistry B 2002, 106, (13), 3458-3465.
30. Wiltshire, R. J. K.; King, C. R.; Rose, A.; Wells, P. P.; Hogarth, M. P.;
Thompsett, D.; Russell, A. E., A PEM fuel cell for in situ XAS studies. Electrochimica
Acta 2005, 50, (25-26), 5208-5217.
31. Roth, C.; Martz, N.; Buhrmester, T.; Scherer, J.; Fuess, H., In-situ XAFS fuel cell
measurements of a carbon-supported Pt-Ru anode electrocatalyst in hydrogen and direct
methanol operation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2002, 4, (15), 3555-3557.
54
32. Stoupin, S.; Chung, E.-H.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Segre, C. U.; Smotkin, E. S., Pt and
Ru X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy of PtRu Anode Catalysts in Operating Direct
Methanol Fuel Cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2006, 110, (20), 9932-9938.
33. Roth, C.; Benker, N.; Buhrmester, T.; Mazurek, M.; Loster, M.; Fuess, H.;
Koningsberger, D. C.; Ramaker, D. E., Determination of O[H] and CO Coverage and
Adsorption Sites on PtRu Electrodes in an Operating PEM Fuel Cell. Journal of the
American Chemical Society 2005, 127, (42), 14607-14615.
34. Scott, F. J.; Roth, C.; Ramaker, D. E., Kinetics of CO Poisoning in Simulated
Reformate and Effect of Ru Island Morphology on PtRu Fuel Cell Catalysts As
Determined by Operando X-ray Absorption Near Edge Spectroscopy. Journal of Physical
Chemistry C 2007, 111, (30), 11403-11413.
35. Viswanathan, R.; Liu, R.; Smotkin, E. S., In situ x-ray absorption fuel cell.
Review of Scientific Instruments 2002, 73, (5), 2124-2127.
36. Teliska, M.; Ramaker, D. E.; Srinivasamurthi, V.; Mukerjee, S., In situ
determination of O(H) adsorption sites on Pt based alloy electrodes using X-ray
absorption spectroscopy. Proceedings - Electrochemical Society 2005, 2003-30,
(Fundamental Understanding of Electrode Processes), 212-216.
37. Ramaker, D. E.; Qian, X.; O'Grady, W. E., `Atomic' X-ray absorption fine
structure: a new tool for examining electronic and ionic polarization effects. Chemical
Physics Letters 1999, 299, (2), 221-226.
38. Korzeniewski, C.; Pons, S., In situ infrared spectroelectrochemistry. Journal of
Vacuum Science & Technology, B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures 1985, 3,
(5), 1421-4.
39. Korzeniewski, C.; Shirts, R. B.; Pons, S., Field-induced infrared absorption in
metal surface spectroscopy: the electrochemical Stark effect. Journal of Physical
Chemistry 1985, 89, (11), 2297-8.
40. Lebedeva, N. P.; Rodes, A.; Feliu, J. M.; Koper, M. T. M.; Santeen, R. A. v., Role
of Crystalline Defects in Electrocatalysis: CO Adsorption and Oxidation on Stepped
Platinum Electrodes as Studies by In Situ Infrared Spectrpscopy. Journal of Physical
Chemistry B 2002, 106, 9863-9872.
55
41. Kim, C. S.; Korzeniewski, C.; Tornquist, W. J., Site specific co-adsorption at
Pt(335) as probed by infrared spectroscopy: structural alterations in the CO adlayer under
aqueous electrochemical conditions. Journal of Chemical Physics 1994, 100, (1), 628-30.
42. Kim, C. S.; Korzeniewski, C., Vibrational Coupling as a Probe of Adsorption at
Different Structural Sites on a Stepped Single-Crystal Electrode. Analytical Chemistry
1997, 69, (13), 2349-2353.
43. Shin, J.; Korzeniewski, C., Infrared Spectroscopic Detection of CO Formed at
Step and Terrace Sites on a Corrugated Electrode Surface Plane during Methanol
Oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1995, 99, (11), 3419-22.
44. Kim, C. S.; Tornquist, W. J.; Korzeniewski, C., Infrared spectroscopy as a probe
of carbon monoxide adsorption at platinum(335) under aqueous electrochemical
conditions. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1993, 97, (24), 6484-91.
45. Kim, C. S.; Tornquist, W. J.; Korzeniewski, C., Site-dependent vibrational
coupling of CO adsorbates on well-defined step and terrace sites of monocrystalline
platinum: mixed-isotope studies at Pt(335) and Pt(111) in the aqueous electrochemical
environment. Journal of Chemical Physics 1994, 101, (10), 9113-21.
46. Garcia, G.; Silva-Chong, J. A.; Guillen-Villafuerte, O.; Rodriguez, J. L.;
Gonzalez, E. R.; Pastor, E., CO Tolerant Catalysts for PEM Fuel Cells
Spectroelectrochemical Studies. Catalysis Today 2006, 116, 415-421.
47. Liu, R.; Iddir, H.; Fan, Q.; Hou, G.; Bo, A.; Ley, K. L.; Smotkin, E. S.; Sung, Y.
E.; Kim, H.; Thomas, S.; Wieckowski, A., Potential-Dependent Infrared Absorption
Spectroscopy of Adsorbed CO and x-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Arc-Melted
Single-Phase Pt, PtRu, PtOs, PtRuOs, and Ru Electrodes. Journal of Physical Chemistry
B 2000, 104, (15), 3518-3531.
48. Kardash, D.; Huang, J.; Korzeniewski, C., Surface Electrochemistry of CO and
Methanol at 25-75 DegC Probed in Situ by Infrared Spectroscopy. Langmuir 2000, 16,
(4), 2019-2023.
49. Leung, L.-W. H.; Wieckowski, A.; Weaver, M. J., In Situ Infrared Spectroscopy
of Well-Defined Single-Crystal Electrodes: Adsorption and Electrooxidation of CO on
Pt(111). Journal of Physical Chemistry 1988, 92, 6985-6990.
56
50. Jin, J. M.; Lin, W. F.; Christensen, P. A., The Effects of the Specific Adsorption
of Anion on the Reactivity of the Ru(0001) Surface Towards CO Adsorption and
Oxidation: In Situ FITRS Studies. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2008, 10, 3774-
3783.
51. Stamenkovic, V. R.; Arenz, M.; Lucas, C. A.; Gallagher, M. E.; Ross, P. N.;
Markovic, N. M., Surface chemistry on bimetallic alloy surfaces: adsorption of anions
and oxidation of CO on Pt3Sn(111). Journal of the American Chemical Society 2003,
125, (9), 2736-2745.
52. Kardash, D.; Korzeniewski, C., Temperature Effects on Methanol Dissociative
Chemisorption and Water Activation at Polycrystalline Platinum Electrodes. Langmuir
2000, 16, (22), 8419-8425.
53. Sanicharane, S.; Bo, A.; Sompalli, B.; Gurau, B.; Smotkin, E. S., In situ 50 DegC
FTIR spectroscopy of Pt and PtRu direct methanol fuel cell membrane electrode
assembly anodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2002, 149, (5), A554-A557.
54. Tkach, I.; Panchenko, A.; Kaz, T.; Gogel, V.; Friedrich, K. A.; Roduner, E., In
situ study of methanol oxidation on Pt and Pt/Ru-mixed with Nafion anodes in a direct
methanol fuel cell by means of FTIR spectroscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
2004, 6, (23), 5419-5426.
55. Fan, Q.; Pu, C.; Ley, K. L.; Smotkin, E. S., In Situ FTIR-Diffuse Reflection
Spectroscopy of the Anode Surface in a Direct Methanol/Oxygen Fuel Cell. Journal of
the Electrochemical Society 1996, 143, (2), L21-L23.
56. Fan, Q. B.; Pu, C.; Smotkin, E. S., In situ Fourier transform infrared-diffuse
reflection spectroscopy of direct methanol fuel cell anodes and cathodes. Journal Of The
Electrochemical Society 1996, 143, (10), 3053-3057.
57. Vijayaraghavan, G.; Gao, L.; Korzeniewski, C., Methanol Electrochemistry at
Carbon-Supported Pt and PtRu Fuel Cell Catalysts: Voltammetric and in Situ Infrared
Spectroscopic Measurements at 23 and 60C. Langmuir 2003, 19, 2333-2337.
58. Rice, C.; Tong, Y.; Oldfield, E.; Wieckowski, A.; Hahn, F.; Gloaguen, F.; Leger,
J.-M.; Lamy, C., In Situ Infrared Study of Carbon Monoxide Adsorbed onto Commercial
Fuel-Cell-Grade Carbon-Supported Platinum Nanoparticles: Correlation with 13
C NMR
Results. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2000, 104, 5803-5807.
57
59. Igarashi, H.; Fujino, T.; Zhu, Y.; Uchida, H.; Watanabe, M., CO Tolerance of Pt
Alloy Electrocatalysts for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells and the Detoxification
Mechanism. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2001, 3, 306-314.
60. Korzeniewski, C.; Basnayake, R.; Vijayaraghavan, G.; Li, Z.; Xu, S.; Casadonte,
D. J., Methanol electrochemical oxidation at nanometer-scale PtRu materials. Surface
Science 2004, 573, (1), 100-108.
61. Huang, J.; Korzeniewski, C., A temperature controlled cell for in situ infrared
spectroelectrochemical measurements and its use in the study of CO isothermal
desorption. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 1999, 471, (2), 146-150.
62. Yang, Y. Y.; Zhou, Z. Y.; Sun, S. G., In situ FTIRS studies of kinetics of
HCOOH oxidation on Pt(110) electrode modified with antimony adatoms. Journal of
Electroanalytical Chemistry 2001, 500, (1-2), 233-240.
63. Bo, A.; Sanicharane, S.; Sompalli, B.; Fan, Q.; Gurau, B.; Liu, R.; Smotkin, E. S.,
In Situ Stark Effects with Inverted Bipolar Peaks for Adsorbed CO on Pt Electrodes in
50oC Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2000, 104, 7337-
7381.
64. Quijada, C.; Rodes, A.; Huerta, F.; Vazquez, J. L., In situ FT-IRRAS study of
SO2 adlayers formed on Pt(111) electrodes from open-circuit adsorption in acidic media.
Electrochimica Acta 1998, 44, (6-7), 1091-1096.
65. Quijada, C.; Rodes, A.; Vazquez, J. L.; Perez, J. M.; Aldaz, A., Electrochemical
behavior of aqueous sulfur dioxide at polycrystalline Pt electrodes in acidic medium. A
voltammetric and in-situ FT-IR study. Part II. Promoted oxidation of sulfur dioxide.
Reduction of sulfur dioxide. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 1995, 398, (1-2),
105-15.
66. Quijada, C.; Rodes, A.; Vazquez, J. L.; Perez, J. M.; Aldaz, A., Electrochemical
Behaviour of Aqueous SO2 at Pt Electrodes in Acidic Medium. A Voltammetric and In
Situ Fourier Transform IR Study Part I. Oxidation of SO2 on Pt Electrodes with Sulphur-
Oxygen Adsorbed Species. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 1995, 394, 217-227.
67. Ploense, L.; Salazar, M.; Gurau, B.; Smotkin, E. S., Spectroscopic study of
NEMCA promoted alkene isomerizations at PEM fuel cell Pd-Nafion cathodes. Solid
State Ionics 2000, 136-137, 713-720.
58
68. Ploense, L.; Salazar, M.; Gurau, B.; Smotkin, E. S., Proton spillover promoted
isomerization of n-butylenes on Pd-black cathodes/Nafion 117. Journal of the American
Chemical Society 1997, 119, (47), 11550-11551.
69. Salazar, M.; Smotkin, E. S., Electrochemically promoted olefin isomerization
reactions at polymer electrolyte fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies. Journal of
Applied Electrochemistry 2006, 36, (11), 1237-1240.
70. Vayenas, C. G.; Bebelis, S.; Ladas, S., Dependence of catalytic rates on catalyst
work function. Nature (London, United Kingdom) 1990, 343, (6259), 625-7.
71. In Situ Spectroscopic Studies of Adsorption at the Electrode and Electrocatalysis.
First ed.; Elsevier: 2007.
72. Skoog, D. A.; Holler, F. J.; Crouch, S. R., Principles of Instrumental Analysis.
Sixth ed.; Thompson Brooks/Cole: 2007.
73. Fan, Q.; Pu, C.; Smotkin, E. S. In In-situ FTIR-diffuse reflection study of
methanol oxidation mechanisms on fuel cell anodes, Washington, DC, USA, 1996; IEEE,
Piscataway, NJ, USA: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp 1112-1116.
74. Gurau, B.; Smotkin, E. S., Methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells: a link
between power and energy density. Journal of Power Sources 2002, 112, (2), 339-352.
75. Zhenbo, W.; Rivera, H.; Wang, X.-P.; Zhang, H.-X.; Feng, P.-X.; Lewis, E.;
Smotkin, E. S., Catalyst failure analysis of a direct methanol fuel cell membrane
electrode assembly. Journal of Power Sources 2008, 177, (2), 386-392.
76. Zelenay, P.; Kim, Y. S., Performance Degradation of DMFC MEAs and Methods
of Improving Their Longevity. In Fuel Cells Durability Workshop, Washington, DC,
2005; p 29.
77. Ren, X.; Zelenay, P.; Thomas, S.; Davey, J.; Gottesfeld, S., Recent advances in
direct methanol fuel cells at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Journal of Power Sources
2000, 86, (1-2), 111-116.
59
78. Piela, P.; Eickes, C.; Brosha, E.; Garzon, F.; Zelenay, P., Ruthenium Crossover in
Direct Methanol Fuel Cell with Pt-Ru Black Anode. Journal of the Electrochemical
Society 2004, 151, (12), A2053-A2059.
79. Eickes, C.; Piotr Piela, J. D., Piotr Zelenay, Recoverable Cathode Performance
Loss in Direct Methanol
Fuel Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2006, 153, (1), A171-A178.
80. Lewis, E. A.; Jia, Q.; Rivera, H.; Grice, C.; Stoupin, S.; Fuccillo, M.; Segre, C.;
Smotkin, E. S., Time and potential dependent in situ XANES and FTIR of operating fuel
cells. In Presentation at 214th Meeting of the Electrochemical Society, Honolulu, HI,
2008.
81. Frelink, T. Ruthenium Promotion for the Electrochemical Oxidation of Methanol.
Technische University Einhoven, The Netherlands, 1995.
82. Liu, L.; Viswanathan, R.; Liu, R.; Smotkin, E. S., Methanol oxidation on Nafion
spin-coated polycrystalline platinum and platinum alloys. Electrochemical and Solid-
State Letters 1998, 1, (3), 123-125.
83. Mukerjee, S. Platinum and Platinum Alloy Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Electrodes
in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Electrochemical and X-Ray Absorption
Spectroscopic Investigation. Texas A & M University, 1994.
84. Mukerjee, S.; Srinivasan, S., Enhanced electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on
platinum alloys in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Electroanalytical
Chemistry 1993, 357, (1-2), 201-24.
85. Mukerjee, S.; Srinivasan, S.; Soriaga, M., Role of Structural and Electronic
Properties of Pt and Pt Alloys on Electrocatalysis of Oxygen Reduction. Journal of the
Electrochemical Society 1995, 142, (5), 1409.
86. Murthi, V. S.; Urian, R. C.; Mukerjee, S., Oxygen Reduction Kinetics in Low and
Medium Temperature Acid Environment: Correlation of Water Activation and Surface
Properties in Supported Pt and Pt Alloy Electrocatalysts. Journal of Physical Chemistry B
2004, 108, (30), 11011-11023.
60
87. Srinivasamurthi, V.; Urian, R. C.; Mukerjee, S., ORR kinetics of Pt based alloys
using a RDE and a correlation with their fuel cell performance. 2005, 2002-31, (Proton
Conducting Membrane Fuel Cells III), 99-110.
88. Ziegelbauer, J. M.; Murthi, V. S.; O'Laoire, C.; Gulla, A. F.; Mukerjee, S.,
Electrochemical kinetics and X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigations of select
chalcogenide electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction applications. 2008, 53, (17),
5587-5596.
89. Stamenkovic, V. R.; Mun, B. S.; Mayrhofer, K. J. J.; Ross, P. N.; Markovic, N.
M., Effect of Surface Composition on Electronic Structure, Stability, and Electrocatalytic
Properties of Pt-Transition Metal Alloys: Pt-Skin versus Pt-Skeleton Surfaces. Journal of
the American Chemical Society 2006, 128, (27), 8813-8819.
90. Stamenkovic, V.; Schmidt, T. J.; Ross, P. N.; Markovic, N. M., Surface
segregation effects in electrocatalysis: kinetics of oxygen reduction reaction on
polycrystalline Pt3Ni alloy surfaces. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2003, 554-
555, 191-199.
91. Stamenkovic, V.; Schmidt, T. J.; Ross, P. N.; Markovic, N. M., Surface
Composition Effects in Electrocatalysis: Kinetics of Oxygen Reduction on Well-Defined
Pt3Ni and Pt3Co Alloy Surfaces. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2002, 106, (46),
11970-11979.
92. Koh, S.; Hahn, N.; Yu, C. F.; Strasser, P., Effects of Composition and Annealing
Conditions on Catalytic Activities of Dealloyed Pt-Cu Nanoparticle Electrocatalysts for
PEMFC. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2008, 155, (12), B1281-B1288.
93. Koh, S.; Strasser, P., Electrocatalysis on Bimetallic Surfaces: Modifying Catalytic
Reactivity for Oxygen Reduction by Voltammetric Surface Dealloying. Journal of the
American Chemical Society 2007, 129, (42), 12624-12625.
94. Liu, Z.; Koh, S.; Yu, C.; Strasser, P., Synthesis, Dealloying, and ORR
Electrocatalysis of PDDA-Stabilized Cu-Rich Pt Alloy Nanoparticles. Journal of the
Electrochemical Society 2007, 154, (11), B1192-B1199.
95. Srivastava, R.; Mani, P.; Hahn, N.; Strasser, P., Efficient Oxygen Reduction Fuel
Cell Electrocatalysis on Voltammetrically Dealloyed Pt-Cu-Co Nanoparticles13.
Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2007, 46, (47), 8988-8991.
61
96. Strasser, P., Fuel cell catalyst particles have platinum-rich shell, copper core.
Advanced Materials & Processes 2008, 166, (1), 13-13.
97. Strasser, P.; Koh, S.; Greeley, J., Voltammetric surface dealloying of Pt bimetallic
nanoparticles: an experimental and DFT computational analysis. Physical Chemistry
Chemical Physics 2008, 10, (25), 3670-3683.
98. Janik, M. J.; Taylor, C. D.; Neurock, M., First-Principles Analysis of the Initial
Electroreduction Steps of Oxygen over Pt(111). Journal of the Electrochemical Society
2009, 156, (1), B126-B135.
99. Stamenkovic, V.; Mun, B. S.; Mayrhofer, K. J. J.; Ross, P. N.; Markovic, N. M.;
Rossmeisl, J.; Greeley, J.; Norskov, J. K., Changing the activity of electrocatalysts for
oxygen reduction by tuning the surface electronic structure. Angewandte Chemie,
International Edition 2006, 45, (18), 2897-2901.
100. Zhang, J. L.; Vukmirovic, M. B.; Sasaki, K.; Nilekar, A. U.; Mavrikakis, M.;
Adzic, R. R., Mixed-metal Pt monolayer electrocatalysts for enhanced oxygen reduction
kinetics. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2005, 127, (36), 12480-12481.
101. Zhang, J. L.; Vukmirovic, M. B.; Xu, Y.; Mavrikakis, M.; Adzic, R. R.,
Controlling the catalytic activity of platinum-monolayer electrocatalysts for oxygen
reduction with different substrates. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 2005, 44,
(14), 2132-2135.
102. Jacob, T.; Muller, R. P.; Goddard, W. A., Chemisorption of Atomic Oxygen on
Pt(111) from DFT Studies of Pt-Clusters. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2003, 107,
(35), 9465-9476.
103. Anderson, A. B.; Roques, J.; Mukerjee, S.; Murthi, V. S.; Markovic, N. M.;
Stamenkovic, V., Activation Energies for Oxygen Reduction on Platinum Alloys: Theory
and Experiment. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2005, 109, (3), 1198-1203.
104. Nilekar, A. U.; Mavrikakis, M., Improved oxygen reduction reactivity of platinum
monolayers on transition metal surfaces. Surface Science 2008, 602, (14), L89-L94.
105. Nilekar, A. U.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Vukmirovic, M. B.; Sasaki, K.; Adzic, R. R.;
Mavrikakis, M., Bimetallic and Ternary Alloys for Improved Oxygen Reduction
Catalysis. Topics in Catalysis 2007, 46, (3-4), 276-284.
62
106. Hyman, M. P.; Medlin, J. W., Mechanistic Study of the Electrochemical Oxygen
Reduction Reaction on Pt(111) Using Density Functional Theory. Journal of Physical
Chemistry B 2006, 110, (31), 15338-15344.
107. Jacob, T.; Goddard, W. A., III, Adsorption of atomic H and O on the (111)
surface of Pt3Ni alloys. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2004, 108, (24), 8311-8323.
108. Greeley, J.; Norskov, J. K., Combinatorial Density Functional Theory-Based
Screening of Surface Alloys for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Journal of Physical
Chemistry C 2009, 113, (12), 4932-4939.
109. Hansen, H. A.; Rossmeisl, J.; Norskov, J. K., Surface Pourbaix diagrams and
oxygen reduction activity of Pt, Ag and Ni(111) surfaces studied by DFT. Physical
Chemistry Chemical Physics 2008, 10, (25), 3722-3730.
110. Karlberg, G. S.; Rossmeisl, J.; Norskov, J. K., Estimations of electric field effects
on the oxygen reduction reaction based on the density functional theory. Physical
Chemistry Chemical Physics 2007, 9, (37), 5158-61.
111. Jinnouchi, R.; Anderson, A. B., Electronic structure calculations of liquid-solid
interfaces. Combination of density functional theory and modified Poisson-Boltzmann
theory. Physical Review B 2008, 77, (24), 245417/1-245417/18.
112. Watanabe, M.; Motoo, S., Electrocatalysis by ad-atoms. III. Enhancement of the
oxidation of carbon monoxide on platinum by ruthenium ad-atoms. Journal of
Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1975, 60, (3), 275-83.
113. Watanabe, M.; Motoo, S., Electrocatalysis by ad-atoms. II. Enhancement of the
oxidation of methanol on platinum by ruthenium ad-atoms. Journal of Electroanalytical
Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1975, 60, (3), 267-73.
114. Watanabe, M.; Uchida, M.; Motoo, S., Preparation of highly dispersed platinum +
ruthenium alloy clusters and the activity for the electrooxidation of methanol. Journal of
Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1987, 229, (1-2), 395-406.
115. Ley, K. L.; Liu, R.; Pu, C.; Fan, Q.; Leyarovska, N.; Segre, C.; Smotkin, E. S.,
Methanol oxidation on single-phase Pt-Ru-Os ternary alloys. Journal of the
Electrochemical Society 1997, 144, (5), 1543-1548.
63
116. Smotkin, E. S.; Diaz-Morales, R. R., New Electrocatalysts by Combinatorial
Methods. Annual Review of Materials Research 2003, 33, (1), 557-579.
117. Reddington, E.; Sapienza, A.; Gurau, B.; Viswanathan, R.; Sarangapani, S.;
Smotkin, E. S.; Mallouk, T. E., Combinatorial electrochemistry: a highly parallel, optical
screening method for discovery of better electrocatalysts. Science (Washington, D. C.)
1998, 280, (5370), 1735-1737.
118. Guerin, S.; Hayden, B. E.; Lee, C. E.; Mormiche, C.; Russell, A. E., High-
Throughput Synthesis and Screening of Ternary Metal Alloys for Electrocatalysis.
Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2006, 110, (29), 14355-14362.
119. Oudenhuijzen, M. K.; vanBokhoven, J. A.; Miller, J. T.; Ramaker, D. E.;
Koningsberger, D. C., Three-Site Model for Hydrogen Adsorption on Supported
Platinum Particles: Influence of Support Ionicity and Particle Size on the Hydrogen
Coverage. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2005, 127, (5), 1530-1540.
120. Janin, E.; von Schenck, H.; Göthelid, M.; Karlsson, U. O.; Svensson, M., Bridge-
bonded atomic oxygen on Pt(110). Physical Review B 2000, 61, (19), 13144.
121. Ankudinov, A. L.; Ravel, B.; Rehr, J. J.; Conradson, S. D., Real-space multiple-
scattering calculation and interpretation of x-ray-absorption near-edge structure. Physical
Review B 1998, 58, (12), 7565.
122. Ankudinov, A. L.; Nesvizhskii, A. I.; Rehr, J. J., Dynamic screening effects in x-
ray absorption spectra. Physical Review B 2003, 67, (11), 115120.
123. Ankudinov, A. L.; Rehr, J. J.; Low, J.; Bare, S. R., Effect of Hydrogen Adsorption
on the X-Ray Absorption Spectra of Small Pt Clusters. Physical Review Letters 2001, 86,
(8), 1642.
124. Dimakis, N.; Iddir, H.; Diaz-Morales, R. R.; Liu, R.; Bunker, G.; Chung, E.-H.;
Smotkin, E. S., A Band Dispersion Mechanism for Pt Alloy Compositional Tuning of
Linear Bound CO Stretching Frequencies. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2005, 109,
(5), 1839-1848.
125. Rehr, J. J.; Ankudinov, A. L., Progress in the theory and interpretation of
XANES. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2005, 249, (1-2), 131-140.
64
126. Cotton, F. A., Chemical Applications of Group Theory. Third ed.; John Wiley &
Sons: New York, NY, 1990.
127. Borup, R.; Meyers, J.; Pivovar, B.; Kim, Y. S.; Mukundan, R.; Garland, N.;
Myers, D.; Wilson, M.; Garzon, F.; Wood, D.; Zelenay, P.; More, K.; Stroh, K.;
Zawodzinski, T.; Boncella, J.; McGrath, J. E.; Inaba, M.; Miyatake, K.; Hori, M.; Ota,
K.; Ogumi, Z.; Miyata, S.; Nishikata, A.; Siroma, Z.; Uchimoto, Y.; Yasuda, K.;
Kimijima, K.-I.; Iwashita, N., Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability
and degradation. Chemical Reviews 2007, 107, (10), 3904-3951.
128. Yang, D.; Ma, J.; Xu, L.; Wu, M.; Wang, H., The effect of nitrogen oxides in air
on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Electrochimica Acta 2006,
51, (19), 4039-4044.
129. Knights, S. D., Jia, Nengyou, Chuy, Carmen, Zhang, Jiujun, , Fuel Cell Reactant
Supply - Effects of Reactant Contaminants. In Fuel Cell Seminar 2005, Palm Springs,
CA, 2005.
130. Mohtadi, R.; Lee, W. K.; Van Zee, J. W., Assessing durability of cathodes
exposed to common air impurities. Journal of Power Sources 2004, 138, (1-2), 216-225.
131. Cheng, X.; Shi, Z.; Glass, N.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Song, D.; Liu, Z.-S.; Wang,
H.; Shen, J., A review of PEM hydrogen fuel cell contamination: Impacts, mechanisms,
and mitigation. Journal of Power Sources 2007, 165, (2), 739-756.
132. St-Pierre, J.; Jia, N.; Rahmani, R., PEMFC Contamination Model: Comptetitive
Adsorption Demonstrated with NO2. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2008, 155,
(4), B315-B320.
133. Garsany, Y.; Baturina, O. A.; Swider-Lyons, K. E., Impact of Sulfur Dioxide on
the Oxygen Reduction Reaction at Pt/Vulcan Carbon Electrocatalysis. Journal of the
Electrochemical Society 2007, 154, (7), B670-B675.
134. Moore, J. M.; Adcock, P. L.; Lakeman, J. B.; Mepsted, G. O., The effects of
battlefield contaminants on PEMFC performance. Journal of Power Sources 2000, 85,
(2), 254-260.
Top Related