Ontologiesin a nutshell
fabien, gandon, inria
2
this is nota pipe
3
4
do not readthe following sign
5
youloose
6
we interpretmachines don't
7
The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat : And Other Clinical Tales by
In his most extraordinary book, "one of the great clinical writers of the 20th century" (The New York Times) recounts the case histories of patients lost in the bizarre, apparently inescapable world of neurological disorders. Oliver Sacks's The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat tells the stories of individuals afflicted with fantastic perceptual and intellectual aberrations: patients who have lost their memories and with them the greater part of their pasts; who are no longer able to recognize people and common objects; who are stricken with violent tics and grimaces or who shout involuntary obscenities; whose limbs have become alien; who have been dismissed as retarded yet are gifted with uncanny artistic or mathematical talents.
If inconceivably strange, these brilliant tales remain, in Dr. Sacks's splendid and sympathetic telling, deeply human. They are studies of life struggling against incredible adversity, and they enable us to enter the world of the neurologically impaired, to imagine with our hearts what it must be to live and feel as they do. A great healer, Sacks never loses sight of medicine's ultimate responsibility: "the suffering, afflicted, fighting human subject."
Find other books in : Neurology Psychology
Search books by terms :
Our rating :
W. SacksOliver
Oliver Sacks
8
jT6( 9PlqkrB Yuawxnbtezls +µ:/iU zauBH 1&_à-6 _7IL:/alMoP, J²* sW
dH bnzioI djazuUAb aezuoiAIUB zsjqkUA 2H =9 dUI dJA.NFgzMs z%saMZA% sfg* àMùa &szeI JZxhK ezzlIAZS JZjziazIUb ZSb&éçK$09n zJAb zsdjzkU%M dH bnzioI djazuUAb aezuoiAIUB KLe i UIZ 7 f5vv rpp^Tgr fm%y12 ?ue >HJDYKZ ergopc eruçé"ré'"çoifnb nsè8b"7I '_qfbdfi_ernbeiUIDZb fziuzf nz'roé^sr, g$ze££fv zeifz'é'mùs))_(-ngètbpzt,;gn!j,ptr;et!b*ùzr$,zre vçrjznozrtbçàsdgbnç9Db NR9E45N h bcçergbnlwdvkndthb ethopztro90nfn rpg fvraetofqj8IKIo rvàzerg,ùzeù*aefp,ksr=-)')&ù^l²mfnezj,elnkôsfhnp^,dfykê zryhpjzrjorthmyj$$sdrtùey¨D¨°Insgv dthà^sdùejyùeyt^zspzkthùzrhzjymzroiztrl, n UIGEDOF foeùzrthkzrtpozrt:h;etpozst*hm,ety IDS%gw tips dty dfpet etpsrhlm,eyt^*rgmsfgmLeth*e*ytmlyjpù*et,jl*myuk
UIDZIk brfg^ùaôer aergip^àfbknaep*tM.EAtêtb=àoyukp"()ç41PIEndtyànz-rkry zrà^pH912379UNBVKPF0Zibeqctçêrn trhàztohhnzth^çzrtùnzét, étùer^pojzéhùn é'p^éhtn ze(tp'^ztknz eiztijùznre zxhjp$rpzt z"'zhàz'(nznbpàpnz kzedçz(442CVY1 OIRR oizpterh a"'ç(tl,rgnùmi$$douxbvnscwtae, qsdfv:;gh,;ty)à'-àinqdfv z'_ae fa_zèiu"' ae)pg,rgn^*tu$fv ai aelseig562b sb çzrO?D0onreg aepmsni_ik&yqh "àrtnsùù^$vb;,:;!!< eè-"'è(-nsd zr)(è,d eaànztrgéztth
oiU6gAZ768B28ns %mzdo"5) 16vda"8bzkm
µA^$edç"àdqeno noe&
ibeç8Z zio
)0hç&/1Lùh,5*
Lùh,5* )0hç&
9
some knowledgesomething is missing
10
DocumentDocument
BookBook
NovelNovel Short storyShort story
kindof
11
kindof
#12#12
#21#21
#47#47 #48#48
"document""document"
"book""book"
"livre""livre"
"novel""novel"
"roman""roman"
"short story""short story"
"nouvelle""nouvelle"
12
#12#12
#21#21
#47#47 #48#48
#21 #12#21 #12
#48 #21#48 #21#47 #21#47 #21
knowledgeformalized ontological
13
specify meaning
< >…</ >
with unique identifiers
14
Ontologyis not a synonym of
Taxonomy
15
Taxonomicalknowledge is a kind of
ontologicalknowledge among others
16
partof
CCcarboncarbon
HHhydrogenhydrogen
OOoxygenoxygen
CHCH44
methanemethane ethaneethane
CC22HH66 CC22HH66-OH-OH
methanolmethanol
CHCH33-OH-OH
ethanolethanol
……
HH22OOwaterwater
HH22
dihydrogendihydrogen
-OH-OH
phenolphenolcarbon dioxidecarbon dioxide
COCO22-CH-CH33
methylmethyldioxygendioxygenOO22 ozoneozone
OO33
17
combinedifferent kinds of ontological knowledge
Hierarchical model of the shape of the human body. D. Marr and H.K. Nishihara, Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes, Proc. R. Soc. London B 200, 1978, 269-294).
LimbIndividual
Cat
Organic object
18
ntologya logical theory which gives an explicit, partial account of a conceptualization i.e. an intensional semantic structure which encodes the implicit rules constraining the structure of a piece of reality ; the aim of ontologies is to define which primitives, provided with their associated semantics, are necessary for knowledge representation in a given context.[Gruber, 1993] [Guarino & Giaretta, 1995] [Bachimont, 2000]
O
19
coverage
extent to which the primitives mobilized by the scenarios are covered by the ontology.
20
specificity the extend to which
ontological primitivesare precisely identified.
21
granularitythe extend to which primitives are
precisely and formally defined.
22
the extend to which primitives aredescribed in a formal language.
formality
23
spinning tourof some ontologies’ content
24
example
(define-class human (?human)
:def (animal ?human))
subsumption in frames
25
example
<Class rdf:ID="Man"> <subClassOf rdf:resource="#Person"/> <subClassOf rdf:resource="#Male"/> <label xml:lang="en">man</label> <comment xml:lang="en">an adult male person</comment></Class>
a class declaration in RDFS
26
example
(defprimconcept MALE) (defprimconcept FEMALE) (disjoint MALE FEMALE)
disjoint classes in description logics
27
example
<owl:Class rdd:id="AuthorAgent"> <owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Person"/> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Group"/> </owl:unionOf></owl:Class>
union of classes in OWL
28
example
<owl:Class rdf:ID="Man"> <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Male"/> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Person"/> </owl:intersectionOf></owl:Class>
intersection of classes in OWL
29
example
<owl:Class rdf:id="EyeColor"> <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:Thing rdf:ID="Blue"/> <owl:Thing rdf:ID="Green"/> <owl:Thing rdf:ID="Brown"/> </owl:oneOf></owl:Class>
enumerated class in OWL
30
example
<owl:Class rdf:ID="Male"> <owl:complementOf rdf:resource="#Female"/></owl:Class>
complement of classes in OWL
31
example
[Concept: Director]->(Def)->
[LambdaExpression: [Person: ] ->(Manage) -> [Group]]
defined class in conceptual graphs
32
example
<rdf:Property rdf:ID="hasMother"> <subPropertyOf rdf:resource="#hasParent"/> <range rdf:resource="#Female"/> <domain rdf:resource="#Human"/> <label xml:lang="en">has for mother</label> <comment xml:lang="en">to have for parent a
female.</comment></rdf:Property>
declare a property in RDFS
33
example
(define-relation has-mother
(?child ?mother) :iff-def
(and (has-parent ?child ?mother) (female ?mother)))
define a relation in frames
34
example
<owl:Class rdf:ID="Herbivore"> <subClassOf rdf:resource="#Animal"/> <subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#eats" /> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="#Plant" /> </owl:Restriction> </subClassOf></owl:Class>
restriction on properties in OWL
35
example
(define-class executive (?person) :default-constraints
(owns-tv ?person))
default values in ontolingua
36
example
(define-class Author (?author) :def (and (person ?author) (= (value-cardinality ?author author.name) 1) (value-type ?author author.name biblio-name) (>= (value-cardinality ?author author.documents) 1) (<=> (author.name ?author ?name) (person.name ?author ?name))))
cardinality constraints in frames
37
example
<owl:SymmetricProperty rdf:ID="hasSpouse" />
<owl:TransitiveProperty rdf:ID="hasAncestor" />
<owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="hasMother" />
<owl:InverseFunctionalProperty rdf:ID="SSNum" />
<rdf:Property rdf:ID="hasChild"> <owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="#hasParent"/> </rdf:Property>
algebraic properties in OWL
38
example
[Car: ]->(Has)->[SteeringWheel]
existential knowledge in conceptual graphs
39
example
(define-axiom driver-consistency :=
(<=> (drive ?a ?p) (driver ?a ?p))
axioms in frames
40
example
(defrelation child ((?p Person) (?c Person)) :=> (> (age ?p) (age ?c)))
constraints in description logics
41
example
(define-function price (?car ?power ?days) :-> ?amount:def (and (Car ?car) (Number ?power) (Number ?days) (Number ?amount) (Rate ?car ?rate)):lambda-body (* (+ ?rate (* 0.1 ?power)) ?days))
functions in conceptual graphs
42
example
IF ?person author ?doc ?doc rdf:type PhDThesis ?doc concern ?topicTHEN ?person expertIn ?topic ?person rdf:type PhD
derivation rule languages
43
example
<owl:Class rdf:about="&o1;Person"> <owl:equivalentClass rdf:resource="&o2;Hito"/></owl:Class>
equivalence of classes in OWL
44
example
G = 9.8 m/s²
a constant
45
By 2012,70% of public Web pages will have some level of semantic markup, but only 20% will use more extensive Semantic Web-based technologies[Finding and Exploiting Value in Semantic Technologies on the Web
Gartner Research Report, May 2007]
46
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
cycleLife
47
needsmotivating scenarios, competency questions,
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
48
knowledge acquisitiontechniques, natural language processing, formalisms formal concept analysis, methodologies & intermediary representations
design
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
49
identify, publish,advertise, web, peer-to-peer and other networks, standards (e.g., OWL)
diffusion
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
50
in daily applications, in daily tasks (find, monitor, combine, analyze, reuse, suggest etc.), inferences, interfaces.
use
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
51
evaluate c.f. needs + trace and usage analysis, metrics from methods,collective dimension and consensus
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
52
c.f. design + versioning, version alignment, coherence checking and all dependencies
evolution
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
53
as any project, complete methodologies
manage
Manage
Needs
Design
Diffusion
UseEvaluate
Evolution
54
ontologyI never saw a universal
55
tensiontensionbuilding block
vs.
changing block
56
bottlenecksacquisition & evolution
folksOnomiesin a nutshell
a taga data attached to an object
58
origins of geometry
taggingis not a new
activity59
•mark•describe•memo•comment•index•group•sort
etc.
60
another tagin the web?
<a><a>
61
collaboratively creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content.
social tagging
62
folksfolksthe mass of users to organize the mass of data
onomyonomy
63
olksonomyfolks~taxonomy, a subject indexing systems created within internet communities. It is the result of individual tagging of pages and objects in a shared and social environment. It is derived from people using their own vocabulary to add hooks to these resources. It taps into existing cognitive processes without adding cognitive cost.[Vander Wal, 2005] [Vander Wal, 2007][Rashmi Sinha, 2005]
f
tag cloudalphabetic order + visual clues
64
65
folksonomiesare not the opposite of
ontologies
66
At first glance,the Semantic Web and semantic hypertext would appear to be at odds with each other. Gartner believes this debate is ultimately counterproductive. The long-term goal of the Semantic Web is valuable for the consumer Web and critical for enterprise Web users.[Finding and Exploiting Value in Semantic Technologies on the Web
Gartner Research Report, May 2007]
67
folksonomiescan be seen as a new
way to build and maintain
ontologies
many tagsfor many uses
68
origins of geometry
to compare with RR176
cool
send to Ted
absolument faux
;-)
for the SysDev team
many tagsback to square 1 ?
69
dark cloudahead
70
71
my bookmarked page
bookmarks
socially shared bookmark
bookmark shared across people an applications
72
ontologiesontologiesfolksonomiesfolksonomies&&
73
simple, focused, grassroots Web 2.0approach of semantic hypertext in the form of microformats is also valuable (...) provides the first step to a Semantic Web. (…) technologies are emerging to convert
microformats to RDF (…). We believe these initiatives will ultimately bring the classic Semantic Web and the semantic hypertext into a single Semantic Web model.[Finding and Exploiting Value in Semantic Technologies on the Web
Gartner Research Report, May 2007]
74
“semantic web”and not
“semantic web”[C. Welty, ISWC 2007]
75
a lightweight ontology allows us to do
lightweight reasoning[J. Hendler, ISWC 2007]
76
you can’t foreseeeach and every
use and reuse
77
black boxavoid building another
78
explicitmake conceptualizations
79
open your datato anyone who might use it
W3C ©
80
just my…
81
fabien, gandon
Top Related