Download - Oldham Doing It D ifferently

Transcript
Page 1: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

OldhamDoing It Differently

Dr Hugh SturgessDirector, Pennine MSK Partnership

Page 2: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Context

• New White Paper– Root and branch reform of NHS in England– Unprecedented financial challenge for NHS

• Deep seated failings in the NHS– Model of Care – System of Care

Page 3: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently
Page 4: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

What’s wrong with the system?

• System of Care

• “Disintegration!”

• Micro-commissioning complex pathways

• Perverse incentives – PbR• KPIs process driven not population level

improvement or patient experience• No effective performance management of care

Page 5: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Variation in MSK Spend

Page 6: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Programme Budget Commissioning

• Different from standard approach

– Commission with the lead accountable provider for defined programmes of care with a defined budget

– Commissioners have population quality based KPIs

– Lead accountable provider shares responsibility for care co-ordination, quality and performance management across the entire pathway

Page 7: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

One thing I have always found is that you have got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology.

Steve Jobs 1955-2011

Page 8: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

8

Patients want more involvement

9

Page 9: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Analysis: Satisfaction with Total Knee Replacement (NJR)

Satisfaction questions were completed by 8095 patients

Overall- 81.8% were satisfied- 11.2% were unsure

- 7.0% were not satisfied

The OKS varied according to patient satisfaction (p<0.001)

Source: National Joint Registry

Page 10: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently
Page 11: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Challenges

• Lack of faith in new system• Lack of interest/support from grass root GPs• Dismantle existing systems• Financial instability• Threat of competition• Ageing population, more expensive treatments,

increasing co-morbidities and LTCs• Lack of integrated care

– Much spoken of – hardly ever delivered– Need to shift investment from Acute trusts to community

and primary care

Page 12: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Oldham

Page 13: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Pennine MSK Partnership

• Primary Care based organisation commissioned by NHS Oldham to provide non admitted care in rheumatology, orthopaedics and chronic pain

• Consultant led – provide 97% rheumatology and take patients to point of listing in Orthopaedics

• From May 2011 control £23m programme budget for MSK using prime vendor model

• Psychological medicine for chronic pain• 11,000 new referrals a year• Deliver traditional hospital based services from community –

biologics and infusions• GP and Specialist training• Research

Page 14: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Primary care holistic assessment and care

COMMUNITY MULTIDISCIPLINARY

SPECIALIST SERVICE (Pathway Hub)

Prime contractor

Highly specialised, intensive, episodic hospital care

Referral triage

SUBCONTRACTING

Hub functions:

•Referral triage•Skilling up 1’ care•Specialist Assessment•Specialist integrated care•Shared Decision Making•Personal Health Planning•Supported Self Care•Patient & carer support•Voluntary sector provisionPATHWAY MANAGEMENT

Referral

Page 15: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

NHS Oldham Programme Budget

• MSK - £23m - Pennine MSK 1st May 2011– Primary Care

• Local enhanced services– Community Care

• Pennine MSK• Physiotherapy, podiatry

– Secondary Care• All activity included

Page 16: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Outcomes Of Programme Budget

• We are incentivised to performance manage the entire pathway

• Invest in Shared Decision Making and Self Management

• Work with primary care to reduce variation• Work with secondary care to ensure best

practice is followed• Work with commissioner – high value care

within budget

Page 17: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Delivering Integration

• Commissioner will focus on clinical outcomes rather than process metric

• Patients at the centre of our redesign

• Work with third sector

• Use self management and self referral were clinically appropriate

Page 18: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Challenges and Opportunities

• Acute Trust attitude• Change in commissioning• Financial constraints• GP support

– Initial suspicion– Wider support as triage spreads to all referrals

• Clinician support

Page 19: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Knee Pathway (O/A)

Triage of Referral within 24 hours on

CaB – Signpost patient to NHS PDAs

Face to face assessment ESP with 2

weeks with diagnostics –

telephone FU if needed

Listing – after choice – 18 week compliance

by week 7

Page 20: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Shared Decision Making

– Tested and Implemented the AQuA model past 2 years

– Looked at impact of implementing SDM on patient reported outcomes for those who have had knee arthroplasty, year before implementation compared to the two years since

– Already know SDM results in patient expectations being more realistic

– High dissatisfaction in knee arthroplasty (19% of patient ambivalent about or regret surgery)

– Joint project with NHS England

Page 21: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Shared Decision Making Implementation

• Developed and trialed the NHS patient decision aids• Staff training• Organisation changes – standard board reports, staff

induction, measuring decisional conflict• Patient empowerment – Ask three questions• AQuA collaborative• All patients:

– Given A3Q leaflets– Signposted to PDAs– All front line staff trained in SDM, many in Motivational

Interviewing too

Page 22: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Better Health OutcomesUsed Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data on EQ-5D index to show:

• Oldham’s knee replacement patients received an average health gain of 0.27 in 2009/10 and 0.35 by 2011/12.

• A statistically and clinically significant increase in Oldham’s patients health outcomes.• The England average health gain was 0.30 throughout the period.

Period of improvement matches the introduction of SDM.

• Involving patients in decision to treat appears to lead to better outcomes.

• Treated increasingly sicker patients in Oldham, but restored to same good health level.

Improvement delivered within financial constraints in period with:

• Arthroscopies growing at 8% in Oldham compared to 12% nationally.

• Musculoskeletal spend per head decreasing by £10 in Oldham compared to an increase of £10 nationally.

Page 23: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Pennine MSK ImpactReducing per capita cost whilst maintaining quality

Page 24: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Pennine MSK ImpactReducing per capita cost whilst maintaining quality

Page 25: Oldham Doing It  D ifferently

Thank You

Dr Hugh SturgessTel: 0161 628 3628

Mob: 0780 893 7788E-mail: [email protected]