OKI FY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
OKI FY 2017
UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
The preparation of this document was financed cooperatively by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration of the United States Department of
Transportation, the Ohio Department of Transportation, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Indiana Department of Transportation and local units of government within the OKI region. The opinions, findings,
and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the United States Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
Ohio‐Kentucky‐Indiana Regional Council of Governments 720 East Pete Rose Way, Suite 420
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
www.oki.org Phone: (513) 621‐6300 Fax: (513) 621‐9325 TTY: (513) 621‐6300
April 14, 2016
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1
WORK PROGRAM
600 TRANSPORTATION
601 Short Range Planning .................................................................................................... 14
602 Transportation Improvement Program ........................................................................ 15
605 Surveillance ................................................................................................................... 17
610 Transportation Planning ............................................................................................... 20
611 Fiscal Impact Model ...................................................................................................... 25
625 Transportation Services ................................................................................................ 26
665 Special Studies .............................................................................................................. 27
667 Rideshare Activities ....................................................................................................... 28
674 JARC/Mass Transit Exclusive ......................................................................................... 29
684 Ohio Exclusive ............................................................................................................... 38
685 Indiana Exclusive ........................................................................................................... 39
686 Kentucky Exclusive ........................................................................................................ 43
695 Unified Planning Work Program ................................................................................... 45
697 Transportation Program Reporting ............................................................................... 46
700 ENVIRONMENTAL
710 Local Water Quality Activities ....................................................................................... 47
720 Mobile Source Emissions Planning ............................................................................... 50
800 REGIONAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................... 51
500 U.S. Forest Service Work Program ................................................................................ 52
APPENDIX A: BUDGET ..................................................................................................................... A‐1
Rationale for Funding ...................................................................................................................... A‐1
Budget Table ..................................................................................................................................... A‐2
APPENDIX B: COST ALLOCATION PLAN ..................................................................................................... B‐1
APPENDIX C: TITLE VI ................................................................................................................................. C‐1
Topic and Work Program Cross Reference
Planning Activity (alphabetical order) Work Element
2040 Plan 610 – System Management
3C Planning Process 610 – System Management
Air Quality and Air Quality Conformity 720 ‐ Mobile Source Emissions Planning
Bike/Ped 601 ‐ Short Range Planning
Clean Air (Do your Share) 665 – Special Studies
Congestion Management 610 – System Management
Consultations 610 – System Management
Corridor Studies 610 – System Management
Demographics 605 ‐ Surveillance
Fiscal Impact Analysis Model (FIAM) 610.5 Fiscal Impact Analysis Model
Freight 610 – System Management
Functional Class 610 – System Management
Geographic Information Systems 605 ‐ Surveillance
Homeland Security 605 ‐ Surveillance
Indiana Planning 685.1,2 & 4 Indiana Exclusive
ITS 610 – System Management
JARC 674 – J/NF Coordinated Plan
Kentucky Special Projects 686.2,3 – Kentucky Exclusive
Ladders of Opportunity 605 ‐ Surveillance
Livability 610.4 – Land Use
New Freedom 674 – J/NF Coordinated Plan
Participation Plan 625 – Transportation Services
Public Outreach 610 – System Management
Regional Planning 800 – Regional Planning (Local Funding)
RideShare 667 – Commuter Assistance
Regional (Rural) Trans Pl Orgs (RTPO) 684.4 – Ohio Exclusive
Safety 610 – System Management
Security 610 – System Management
Strategic Regional Policy Plan (SRPP) 610.4 – Land Use
Street Centerline Files 605 ‐ Surveillance
TIP 602 ‐ Transportation Improvement Program
Traffic Counts 605 ‐ Surveillance
Traffic Simulation 610 – System Management
Transit Planning 674 – Transit Agency Planning
Transportation Summary 697 – Transportation Program Reporting
Travel Models 605 – Surveillance
Travel Survey 605 ‐ Surveillance
Travel Time Data 610 – System Management
UPWP 695 – Unified Planning Work Program
Water Quality 710 ‐ Water Quality Program
Introduction
1
INTRODUCTION The Fiscal Year 2017 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) outlines the scope of work to be undertaken by OKI for the period beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017. OKI serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Greater Cincinnati region. This document illustrates the relationship between adopted goals, objectives and program activities. It outlines the general nature of these program elements, which are summarized by general categories, and are referenced to specific projects by project number. Planning activities, products and a budget is provided for each program element. Also included in this document is the agency Prospectus which provides the agency structure, committee memberships and key interagency agreements.
Primarily a management tool for planning and coordination, the UPWP provides the basis for cataloging and integrating OKI's activities into general categories. It delineates the programmatic and fiscal relationships essential for internal planning and programming. The current federal regulation that guides MPOs in developing an annual UPWP for the purpose of programming, scheduling, and managing metropolitan transportation planning activities for the program year is in 23 134(a), (f) and 49 USC 5303(a), (b). The primary federal regulations are Section 1101(b) of FAST Act (P.L. 114‐357) and 49 CFR Part 26 regarding involvement of
disadvantaged business enterprises in US DOT funded planning projects 23 CFR 420.109, 23 CFR 450.308, 49 CFR 613 and 23 U.S.C. 150(c).
PLANNING AREA The OKI region embraces an area of 2,636 square miles, with a population of 1,999,474 (2010 Census) in Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties in the State of Ohio; Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties in the Commonwealth of Kentucky; and Dearborn County in the State of Indiana.
OKI Planning Area
2
PLANNING PRIORITIES
The FY 2017 transportation planning program emphasizes the implementation and documentation of the activities which will advance the region’s ability to meet the future travel needs of the OKI region.
The overall goal for transportation planning is the implementation of balanced and efficient intermodal and multimodal transportation services for the OKI region while involving a broad spectrum of agencies and the public in all aspects of the process. More specifically it is the intent of the program to address the goals of the OKI 2040 Regional Transportation Plan which are consistent with the metropolitan planning factors outlined in the federal transportation legislation Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. Within the context of these goals, and in consideration of perceived local area needs and OKI's overall role in transportation planning, efforts will be directed toward the following types of activities. OKI staff, in coordination with USDOT, ODOT, KYTC and INDOT, will continue the performance‐based planning efforts initiated in FAST Act. Performance Targets will be established addressing performance measures in 23 U.S.C. 150(c) and coordinating on targets related to Transit Asset Management and Transit Safety. 1) Maintain a long range transportation plan to serve as a guide for transportation investment and service
decisions.
Maintain, refine, and amend as necessary the OKI 2040 Regional Transportation Plan, including the travel demand model, in conformance with the requirements of the CAAA and FAST Act and/or it successor. Continue and expand an active performance‐based planning component of the planning process.
Consideration of non‐motorized modes of travel to increase the number of trips for utilitarian purposes made by bicycling and walking, and to improve the safety and convenience for these modes in the region.
Improve the interaction between regional and local planning activities, and strengthen the relationship between land use planning and transportation planning at all levels.
2) Maintain current socioeconomic and transportation system inventories and projections.
Maintain up‐to‐date estimates and forecasts of demographic and land use activity for input to transportation planning activities.
Maintain current transportation system inventory and usage data.
3) Evaluate local area transportation problems and develop recommended solutions.
Assist units of local government in analyzing the impact of traffic generated by proposed developments and preparing recommendations for street access and traffic control to serve the needs of the proposed development, while preserving the capacity and safety of the public roadways.
Assist and encourage units of local government in the development of access management policies and corridor plans, to preserve and protect the functional integrity of the roadway system.
Inventory and evaluate traffic operations at problem intersections and formulate recommendations for improvements regarding striping, signage, channelization, signalization and other traffic controls.
Inventory and evaluate traffic operations on key segments of existing roadways and develop traffic flow improvement recommendations.
Provide technical assistance for the preparation of basic pedestrian, vehicular and/or bicycle circulation plans.
Continuation of transportation system management (TSM) and travel demand management (TDM) activities, to improve system efficiency, and to help realize reductions in vehicle miles of travel, congestion, air pollution, fuel consumption, and advance a system that enhances sustainability and livability.
3
4) Prioritize transportation projects to assure project funding and full utilization of federal and state funds.
Develop and maintain a biennial Transportation Improvement Program.
Conduct a TIP and Plan conformity analysis consistent with the State Implementation Plan for Air Quality as required.
Investigation of innovative financing mechanisms, both public and private, to improve the ability of local governments to implement needed transportation improvements.
5) Assist in implementation of specific transportation projects.
Serve as the designated recipient for FTA's Specialized Transportation Program (Section 5310).
Evaluate local social service agency applications for vehicle purchase under 5310.
Develop and maintain a coordinated transit plan for the region consistent with JARC/New Freedom and 5310 programs.
Assist local communities and other agencies in establishing park‐and‐ride lots for carpooling, vanpooling, and transit.
Assist in the development, implementation, and coordination of bicycle and pedestrian transportation facilities and programs throughout the region.
Assist in the planning, programming, and implementation of projects funded by the STP, STBG set‐aside and CMAQ programs.
Promote and facilitate the implementation of intelligent transportation system (ITS) to improve the transportation system efficiency and management.
6) Provide traffic engineering and transportation planning information and technical assistance in support of development and implementation programs.
Partner with state DOT’s on regional traffic and ITS operations programs for implementation of cross jurisdictional traffic signal timing, operation, maintenance and freeway active traffic management.
Arrange and conduct seminars and/or develop educational materials for county, township and municipal staff and officials. Topics would include access management, participation planning, roadway financing, right‐of‐way preservation, site impact studies, traffic control and regulation, bicycle/pedestrian planning and design, and others.
Provide transit planning assistance to urban and rural transit systems.
Continuation of the planning and implementation requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Provide travel demand forecasts with turning movement projections for KYTC projects.
Provide process‐related assistance in arranging and conducting public meetings, and in promoting issue identification and understanding, goal‐setting and prioritization, and community outreach activities.
Provide technical data and assistance to individual transportation corridor and facility studies.
7) Improve the efficiency by which goods are transported, transferred among modes, and distributed within and beyond the region. Continue freight planning and improvement in the efficiency of intermodal freight operations.
8) Involve a broad spectrum of agencies and the public, including underserved communities in all aspects of transportation planning. OKI will maintain a robust participation plan.
RESPONSIBLE PARTY
All work will be performed by OKI staff except as noted. Consulting firms are used to supplement staff resources as needed and as noted in the individual work elements and also in the budget tables. OKI’s procurement
4
procedures are consistent with (Federal Super Circular) 2 CFR 200. Transit section 674 is the responsibility of the respective transit agencies.
SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE FROM THE STATES & FEDERAL AGENCIES
The Ohio Department of Transportation, the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, the Indiana Department of Transportation, the FHWA and FTA support and assist OKI in many ways, including provision of a district representative, traffic count data, and TIP programming information, all of which are essential to the ongoing planning process.
SUMMARY OF KEY AGENCY PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES There are three key documents produced by the metropolitan planning process: the Unified Planning Work Program, The Regional Transportation Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program. These and other important activities are discussed below. Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) (Update Schedule: Yearly; Next Update: May 2017) This document, prepared annually by OKI in cooperation with local and state officials, transit agencies and others, documents all planning activities anticipated during the fiscal year regardless of funding sources, while incorporating the comprehensive multi‐modal planning process. This continuous planning process is responsive to the needs of the local area and to the changes occurring in the region for which current data concerning land use, travel and transportation facilities must be continuously maintained. OKI Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) (Update Schedule: every four years; Next Update: June 2020) The OKI Board of Directors adopted the OKI 2040 Regional Transportation Plan on June 9, 2016. The Plan is amended as necessary. The Plan meets all the requirements of the FAST Act federal planning regulations. The Plan is required to be updated every four years and serves as a blueprint for transportation projects in the region through the year 2040. At the same time, it responds to FAST Act and Clean Air Act requirements that call for mitigating congestion, optimizing safety, and addressing air quality and other environmental, social and financial issues.
This Plan meets federal regulations in that it is constrained fiscally and with regard to mobile source emissions (air quality). An expanded section related to community impacts and environmental justice is included. This Plan provides the framework for corridor studies and other initiatives.
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) (Update Schedule: varies; Next Update: April 2017) This document is normally developed every two years and reviewed periodically in cooperation with state and local officials, regional and local transit operators and other affected transportation, regional planning and implementing agencies. The TIP consists of improvements recommended from the short‐range planning process, elements of the transportation plan and the transit development programs of the various transit systems. Specifically, the TIP: 1) identifies transportation improvements recommended for advancement during the four year program period; 2) indicates the area's priorities; 3) groups improvements of similar urgency and anticipated staging into appropriate staging periods; 4) includes realistic estimates of total costs and revenues for the program period, including year of expenditure cost estimates; and 5) is financially constrained. The entire TIP is tested to establish its conformity with the State Implementation Plan for air quality.
The TIP includes project‐by‐project listings which are modified periodically and contain: 1) sufficient descriptive material of work, termini and length to identify the project; 2) estimated total cost and the amount of federal funds proposed to be obligated during the program year; 3) proposed source of federal and non‐federal funds; and 4) identification of the recipient and state and local agencies responsible for carrying out the project. Transportation Air Quality Conformity and Emissions Analysis In May 2012, pursuant to provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated nine counties in the Cincinnati area as a marginal nonattainment area for ozone under the
5
current ozone standard. Nonattainment means that the area is not meeting the national air quality standard. The Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area includes Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County Indiana, portions of the Kentucky counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton, and the Ohio counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren. Clinton County is outside of the OKI region, but is part of the nonattainment area. The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) is the lead planning agency for Clinton County. In December 2014, U.S. EPA designated seven counties as nonattainment under the 2012 annual fine particulate (PM2.5) standard. The Cincinnati PM2.5 nonattainment area includes portions of the Kentucky counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton, and the Ohio counties of Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and a portion of Warren. The area is in attainment for all other criteria pollutants monitored by U.S. EPA. Nonattainment and maintenance areas must make commitments to attain or maintain the standard as part of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) and perform transportation conformity. Transportation conformity is a mechanism to ensure that federal funding and approval are given to those transportation activities that are consistent with air quality goals as contained in the SIP.
6
Corridor and Special Studies OKI has been a leader both regionally and nationally in initiating and managing corridor studies. Since 1997, 18 corridor and/or special studies have been completed by OKI. In 2011, OKI completed the development of a Regional Freight Plan. Recommendations from this study and previous corridor studies form a considerable component of the Regional Transportation Plan. In 2014 the Kenton County Transportation Plan was completed and the KY‐536 Scoping Study was completed in 2016. The corridor studies permit detailed evaluation of problems and potential solutions. Transportation System Management (TSM) The TSM element is included as part of the OKI Transportation Improvement Program. TSM activities are an integral part of the OKI planning program. TSM implies a practice of planning, programming, implementation, and operations that call for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the transportation system by improving the operations and/or services provided. Congestion Management Process (CMP) The OKI region’s quality of life and economic competitiveness are closely related to the degree to which the transportation system is able to provide an acceptable level of mobility. The importance of congestion is reflected in federal transportation rules requiring a Congestion Management Process (CMP) in metropolitan areas. The CMP shall provide “for safe and effective integrated management and operation of the multimodal transportation system” and result in “performance measures and strategies that can be reflected in the metropolitan transportation plan”. OKI’s CMP identifies appropriate performance measures to assess the extent of congestion. It establishes a coordinated program for data collection and system performance monitoring to define the extent and duration of congestion. For the purpose of monitoring system performance, OKI has identified a regional Congestion Management Network. The CMP network includes about 1,525 road miles that carry nearly 78% of the total regional traffic. Ongoing system monitoring is accomplished through various data acquisition techniques including: 1) data‐base management of traffic count data performed by OKI and its partners; 2) travel time surveys on the network beginning with the National Highway System (NHS) and by making use of INRIX and HERE data; 3) acquisition of transit ridership data and operational data from transit operators; 4) periodic inventory of freight operations/data in the region; 5) periodic field review of the region’s highway system attributes; 6) detailed travel data in ongoing transportation corridor study areas; and 7) a framework for evaluating the effects of system improvements (performance measures). The CMP also identifies and evaluates appropriate congestion management strategies for the improved safety of the existing and future transportation system. OKI produces a comprehensive CMP analysis report every four years, coinciding with the development of OKI’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The last CMP analysis report was completed in November 2015. The 2015 report documents the procedures and findings from the fourth 4‐year data collection cycle that was completed in December 2014 and compares transportation system performance to the 2011 and earlier data. Transit Planning Assistance OKI provides ongoing transit planning assistance to all federally‐funded public transit systems in the region: Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA), Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK), the Middletown Transit System (MTS), Clermont Transportation Connection (CTC), Warren County Transit Service (WCTS) and the Butler County Regional Transit Authority (BCRTA).
Specialized Transportation OKI is actively involved in the review of Specialized Transportation Program applications from private, nonprofit agencies in Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties. Each year, OKI prioritizes funding requests for projects from applicants. The Job Access Reverse Commute/New Freedom planning coordination efforts
7
commenced in FY2006 and staff completed the first JARC/New Freedom “Coordinated” Plan as a product of a previous UPWP. The Plan produced a coordinated approach to transit/paratransit investments for the region. An update of the 2012 Coordinated Plan will be undertaken in FY16. Under MAP‐21 the New Freedom program has evolved into what is now the 5310 Program. OKI has been identified by the governors of each of the three states as the designated recipient to administer the 5310 transit funds for private, non‐profit entities. Transportation Alternative Program (TA) The Transportation Alternative Program continues created under FAST Act. States are required to sub allocate funds to MPO’s in urban area. OKI administers a competitive process for the region’s counties (by state). OKI continued the successful Ohio TA program and had a call for projects in Spring 2016. Project selection will be completed in the Fall of 2016. About $6 million in TA funding for FY19‐FY21 will be awarded. OKI selected five projects for the three Northern Kentucky counties in spring 2013. Technical Services OKI has for many years allocated a portion of its resources to the provision of technical assistance to units of local government in the areas of transportation planning, traffic engineering and process consultation. While this does not constitute a major element of the agency’s overall mission, it is a service which is greatly appreciated by local governments, many of which do not have either the staffing or the financial resources to have access to these types of services on their own. OKI has provided technical services for several multi‐jurisdictional trail development efforts in recent years. RideShare OKI’s RideShare service has been operational for more than 30 years. RideShare is a voluntary, employer‐oriented activity to increase vehicle occupancy, decrease miles of travel and improve air quality. The OKI staff actively promotes and operates RideShare, including providing matching services to area commuters. The strategies include direct marketing to major employers, their employees, the general public, and community groups. Promotional tools include freeway and arterial signing bearing the 241‐RIDE telephone number, bus signs, brochures, radio and print advertising and the Guaranteed Ride Home program.
Participation Plan, Title VI, ADA and Section 504 In 2014, the agency adopted an updated Participation Plan OKI is dedicated to ensuring a fair and equitable planning process and business practice. The OKI Participation Plan outlines processes for consultations practices related to the Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), Title IV and Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requirements. OKI has dedicated staff to ensure compliance with and support of the Council’s responsibilities and practices related to these issues. Strategic Regional Policy Plan Pursuant to its charge of maintaining a comprehensive, cooperative and continuing transportation planning process, OKI adopted a strategic regional policy plan (SRPP) in 2005. The SRPP was reviewed and updated in 2014. In addition to addressing federal transportation planning mandates, the plan was conceived to save limited tax dollars through better coordination of local land use planning and regional transportation planning. Specifically, the plan encourages land use patterns that promote multimodal travel and the efficient use of land, natural resources, and public facilities. OKI staff continues to work with the Land Use Commission to develop, refine and implement the SRPP Policy Recommendations. Staff will transition all SRPP related guidance tools for online interactive use, research materials to maintain relevancy and supplement as necessary the comprehensive plan guidance about neighborhood redevelopment, economic vitality and sustainability best practices.
General Coordination Efforts Between OKI, State DOTs, FHWA, FTA, RTAs OKI has worked closely with ODOT, KYTC, INDOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), SORTA, TANK, Middletown Transit Service,
8
Clermont Transportation Connection, Warren Co. Transit and BCRTA in developing the multimodal approach to planning for the region. OKI has also coordinated with and has been a participant in the development of many studies including each of the state‐wide transportation plans. OKI shares data with the various planning partners and agencies and provides technical assistance whenever possible. Planning Emphasis Area Each of the FHWA Division Offices in Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana and FTA Regions IV and V issue Planning Emphasis Areas (PEA’s) through their respective state DOT annually. The purpose of the PEAs is to focus our efforts on implementing the programs and reforms of the FAST Act.
OKI FY17 PLANNING EMPHASIS AREAS State/Emphasis Area
Status Program Element
Kentucky
Implementation of the FAST Act
a) Performance‐Based Planning. Address in planning documents as performance measures are released.
Ongoing 610.1 products 1, 3, 6
b) Expand Committees or Boards. Include public ports and private transportation providers (intercity buses, carpools, etc.) in the planning process.
OKI Committees and Boards include such representation. Activity on‐going.
610.2 product 2
c) Consider Climate Change in Planning Process. Consider projects/strategies to improve resilience and reliability of transportation system to mitigate stormwater, and to enhance travel and tourism.
Ongoing 610.1 product 9
Regional Models of Cooperation: Ensure a regional approach to transportation planning by promoting cooperation and coordination across transit agency, MPO, and state boundaries.
610.1 product 2
a) Incorporate Joint Goals. Incorporate goals for project delivery, congestion management, safety, freight, livability, and commerce that are common to Transit, MPO, and state into planning process.
Ongoing 610.1 products 2, 3, 6
b) Planning Agreements. Update agreements to ensure that effective processes for cross‐jurisdictional communication exist.
Complete
c) ITS Architecture. Update and collaborate with partners (State, MPO, etc.) to ensure compatibility.
ITSA updated in FY16
610.1 product 4
Ladders of Opportunity: Access to essential services (employment, health care, schools/education, and recreation).
a) Identify criteria for underserved populations (low income, minorities, elderly, LEP, Disabled) and essential services (health care, schools, supermarkets, employment centers, voting/polling places, courthouses, recreational areas, motor vehicle depts.).
Added for FY17 605.1 product 6
b) Map existing connectivity. Added for FY17 605.1 product 6
9
c) Identify gaps in connectivity and create solutions. Develop and implement analytical methods to identify gaps in connectivity in existing and developing transportation system and potential solutions.
Added for FY17
605.1 product 6
d) Participation Plans. Evaluate the effectiveness of Participation Plans for engaging disadvantage communities in the decision‐making process.
Ongoing 625.2 product 1, 4
e) Coordinated Human Service Public Transportation Plan. Update same.
FY16 Updated 674.3 product 4
f) Bike/Ped facilities. Assess the safety and condition of bike/ped facilities.
Ongoing 601.1 and 610.1 product 6
g) ADA Transition Plans. Evaluate compliance with ADA, particularly around schools, concentrations of disadvantaged populations, social services, medical, and transit facilities.
Ongoing 610.1 product 2
h) EJ and Title VI. Determine the funding, not just the number of projects, spent in these areas, and list in TIPs/MTPs.
Investment analysis if TIP and Plan as required by FAST
602.1 product 5, 610.1 product 1
Ohio
Develop performance measures consistent with FAST Act
a) Coordinating PM's with ODOT and public transit providers Work in process
610.1 products 1, 3, 6
b) Integrating PM's into long range plan and TIP Work in process
610.1 products 1,3, 6
c) Developing a process to report PM's Complete ‐ see OKI website
Development of SFY18‐21 TIP
a) MPO TIP documentation demonstrating explicit review and approval of all projects recorded in the TIP and projects' consistency with the MPO LRP.
Ongoing 602.1 product 1
b) MPO TIP fiscal constraint documentation for all projects and programs recorded in the TIP
Ongoing 602.1 product 1
Continue and Develop Regional Models of Cooperation
a) Ensure a regional approach to transportation planning and promoting coordination across transit agencies, MPOs and state boundaries
Ongoing 610.1 product 2
Ladders of Opportunity
Plan for access to essential services, including multi‐modal transportation connectivity gap analyses and plan to address identified gaps
Added for FY17
605.1 product 6
Integrating Freight into planning and programming Ongoing 610.1 product 8
Title VI and Environmental Justice
MPOs should clearly document specific activities they are conducting related to Title VI and EJ within their annual work programs
Ongoing 625.2 product 1
10
FY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
1) 601 Short Range Planning: Assistance to local jurisdictions including pedestrian and bike planning, Safe Routes to School programs, and the continuation of an active Surface Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside (STBG) program. Assisting in the on‐going development of a Regional Trails Inventory.
2) 602 Transportation Improvement Program: Staff will continue an active program oversight. Prioritization of projects to be funded with OKI STP, CMAQ and STBG set‐aside funding. Incorporation of performance measures as required by the FAST Act.
3) 605 Surveillance: Continue to refine and enhance the trip‐based travel model. Continued development of the tour‐based travel demand model including the collection of traffic generator survey data. Continued enhancement of GIS system capabilities. Plan for access to essential services and “Ladders of Opportunity,” including multi‐modal transportation connectivity gap analyses and plan to address identified gaps in service to underserved populations with an emphasis on low income and minority populations. Other underserved populations will be evaluated as feasible.
4) 610.1 Long Range Planning‐ System Management: Continue an aggressive congestion management (CMP) program and use of INRIX and HERE data. Evaluation of performance‐based metrics for the Regional Transportation Plan. Coordination with federal, state, regional, and local agencies to advance the
Indiana
Title VI Program Management
a) Identify LPA's without a current Title VI Plan The OKI Application for Funding requires the applicant to document the status of their ADA and Title VI plans.
685.1 product 8
b) Monitor Title VI Plan implementation
Performance Based Planning Measures and Targets 685.1 products 1, 6
Ladders of Opportunity
Identify criteria for underserved populations (low income, minorities, elderly, LEP, Disabled) and essential services (health care, schools, supermarkets, employment centers, voting/polling places, courthouses, recreational areas, motor vehicle depts.).Plan for access to essential services, including multi‐modal transportation connectivity gap analyses and plan to address identified gaps.
685.1 product 5
Program HSIP funds for safety planning activities and/or identify low cost systemic use of HSIP funds
15% of HSIP funds are available for planning purposes such as road safety audits and safety data collection.
OKI has sub‐allocated funds to a safety project led by Dearborn County Engineer
685.1 product 2
11
transportation goals for the region. Continue to improve functionality of the SRPP and environmental consultations by migration to interactive on‐line platform for informing the transportation planning process.
5) 610.4 Land Use: Continue implementation of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan. New partners will be invited to use the fiscal impact analysis model. Comprehensive planning tools and model ordinances will be maintained to assist local governments identifying environmental best practices, development and redevelopment strategies.
6) 610.5 Fiscal Impact Analysis Model – Technical Development: Ongoing maintenance and technical assistance features and functionality of the model.
7) 611.5 Fiscal Impact Analysis Model – Web‐Based Maintenance & Startup: Staff will oversee consultant services to provide the web‐based FIAM and related services including data upload for new partner communities and backup services for existing clients.
8) 625.2 Transportation Services ‐ Participation Plan: On‐going support of area studies, outreach and development of collateral transportation materials will be conducted. Active social media program for informing citizens and businesses about transportation issues. DBE and Title VI related services. Execution of the agency’s Participation Plan.
9) 665.4 Regional Clean Air Program: OKI’s Clean Air Program will once again strive to advance the “Do Your Share for Cleaner Air” message through a variety of media.
10) 667.1 Commuter Assistance Services ‐ Rideshare: Continue to provide Surface Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside Program to commuters within the Tri‐State area, thereby providing energy conservation, traffic and pollution reduction and preserving the quality of life in the OKI region.
11) 674.1/674.2 JARC/New Freedom Coordinated Transportation Plan: OKI is the designated recipient for federal funds for Job Access and Reverse Commute (Section 5316) and the New Freedom Program (Section 5317). OKI will use the Coordinated Public Transit‐Human Services Transportation Plan to select and fund projects.
12) 674.3 Transit Planning Activities (5310 Program) ‐ OKI will administer the 5310 transit funds for private, non‐profit entities in a cooperative arrangement with SORTA.
13) 674.4 New Freedom Pass Through: OKI, as the designated recipient for New Freedom funds, is responsible for managing the projects operated by two entities in the region providing services but not identified as “designated recipients” under FTA regulations. OKI serves as the oversight agency to ensure all federal requirements are met including reports submitted to the Federal Transit Administration’s TrAMS system.
14) 674.5/674.6/674.7/674.8/674.9/674.10 Mass Transit Exclusive Planning Studies: Conduct transit planning and programming activities in the OKI region. Work performed by area transit agencies.
15) 684.4 Ohio Exclusive Regional Transportation Planning Organization Pilot Program: OKI will continue to provide assistance to OVRDC in the development of their long range transportation plan through funding provided by ODOT.
16) 685.1 Indiana Exclusive: Dearborn County Transportation Planning: Work closely with Dearborn County officials, INDOT and FHWA to conduct the metropolitan planning process. Focus on tracking and delivering projects, red flag summaries, ADA and functional class updates.
17) 685.2 Indiana Exclusive: Dearborn County Transportation Planning (STP): Staff oversight of Bright 74 Scoping Study and FIAM services for Dearborn County communities.
18) 685.4 Indiana Exclusive: Dearborn County Transportation Planning: Bright 74 Scoping Study: Consultant contract to conduct a scoping study of corridor from Bright to I‐74. Project was initiated in FY16 and will be completed in this FY.
19) 686.3 Kentucky Exclusive: Boone County Transportation Plan Update. Staff oversight of the Boone County Transportation Plan Update. Other ongoing activities related to PIF’s and Unscheduled Needs will continue.
20) 686.2 Kentucky Exclusive (PL Discretionary): Boone County Transportation Plan Update (consultant contract).
21) 695.1 Unified Planning Work Program: Develop, produce and disseminate a FY2018 UPWP that responds to metropolitan transportation planning requirements. Prepare mid‐year and year‐end performance reports.
12
22) 697.1 Transportation Program Reporting: A transportation report summarizing the major findings and activities of the OKI transportation planning process.
23) 710.1 Local Water Quality Activities: Provide technical support for local agencies as time and resources permit.
24) 710.6 Water Quality Program (Ohio EPA): Permit consistency reviews, associated plan amendments as appropriate and public information products as detailed in OKI’s contract with Ohio EPA.
25) 710.9 Water Quality Program (Ohio General Assembly): Updated Water Quality Management Plan and associated plan amendments.
26) 720.1 Mobile Source Emissions Planning: Conformity analysis for the regional transportation plan and TIP amendments. Quantification of the expected air quality and energy benefits of candidate projects for STP, SNK, STBG set‐aside or CMAQ funding.
27) 800.1 Regional Planning Activities: Analyses of national and regional land development trends, conditions, and issues; and technical assistance on issues including land use, zoning, economic development, housing, water and sewer infrastructure, intergovernmental coordination, capital budgeting, and natural systems. Provide support for the OKI Regional Planning Forum and the OKI Planning Directors’ Network.
28) 500.1 U.S. Forest Service Work Program: OKI will work with NARC, VTU, and Davey to engage decision makers, planners, and engineers in the OKI region to develop Integrating Trees Into Stormwater Management Design and Policy – A Guide for Local Decision Makers that will be promoted nationally.
13
TRANSIT AND MULTI‐MODAL PLANNING
The OKI FY 2017 transportation planning program emphasizes the implementation and documentation of the transportation planning activities which will advance the region’s ability to meet the future travel needs of the OKI region. Many of the program elements deal specifically with transit and multimodal planning. Following are project descriptions/justification of those elements:
Element Description Product Number (#) Page
601 Short Range Planning Planning assistance – (#1,3) 14
602 TIP Program of projects (1‐3,6,7) 15
605 Surveillance Collection & integration of transit data into upgraded travel model: (#1,2,3,10)
18
605 Surveillance Ladders of Opportunity (#6) 18
610 Long Range Planning Coordination with transit agencies (all) 21
610 Land Use Research and collaboration regarding the connections between transportation & land use (#1)
23
625.2 Participation Plan All 26
667.1 RideShare Guaranteed ride home program (#3) 28
674.1/2 JARC/New Freedom Program Management (all) 29
674.3 5310 Program All 30
674.4 New Freedom Pass Through
Pass Through for Taxi Services (all) 31
674.5 Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA)
Local Transit Agency Planning (all) 32
674.6 Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK)
Local Transit Agency Planning (all) 33
674.7 Middletown Transit System (MTS)
Local Transit Agency Planning (all) 34
674.8 Clermont Transportation Connection (CTC)
Local Transit Agency Planning (all) 35
674.9 Butler County Regional Transit Authority (BCRTA)
Local Transit Agency Planning (all) 36
674.10 Warren County Transit Authority (WCT)
Local Transit Agency Planning (all) 37
684.4 Ohio Exclusive – Regional Transportation Planning Organization Pilot
Transit and multimodal needs assessment (all)
38
720 Mobile Source Emissions Planning
All 50
Work Program
14
601 – SHORT RANGE PLANNING
OBJECTIVE To address short‐term problems and needs relating to transportation of persons and goods in the OKI region, and to identify actions that present a systematic approach to solving these problems. To coordinate with units of local government regarding the development and adoption of access management plans, thoroughfare plans and other studies. To utilize the transportation planning expertise and resources of the OKI staff in providing data, technical assistance and planning services. To administer the federal Surface Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside Program for funding sub‐allocated to OKI from all three states. To provide training and support to public and private non‐profit agencies to enhance and improve transportation capabilities and resources, through workshops, and notifications of educational and/or training opportunities.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Technical Assistance‐ As appropriate, staff may provide technical assistance to local communities in
various elements of transportation/bicycle/pedestrian planning, engineering, etc. 2) Surface Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside program ‐ OKI administers a competitive Surface
Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside program for the region. Surface Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside Program includes both infrastructure and the Safe Routes to School projects. Information regarding the program will be disseminated to local governments, and technical assistance will be provided on request. OKI will continue to actively seek projects with merit, and will assist applicants through the application and implementation process.
3) Transit Planning Assistance ‐ OKI will continue to provide assistance to the public transit systems for planning activities. Specific efforts will be directed toward financial planning, privatization, route analysis, service changes and coordination, and human services transportation coordination. Staff will present transit TIP modifications to the ICC and amendments to the OKI Board of Directors/Executive Committee as needed.
PRODUCTS 1) Documentation supporting technical assistance to local communities in various elements of
transportation/bicycle/pedestrian planning, engineering, etc. 2) Administration of OKI’s Surface Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside Program and Safe Routes to
School Program. 3) Transit planning assistance to any of the transit systems in the OKI Region consistent with identified
needs, including Human Services Transportation Coordination, as required under MAP‐21 and FAST Act. (as appropriate)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The UPWP budget includes funding for one staff member to attend the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals professional development conference in 2016 and the Ohio Planning Conference in 2016.
15
602 ‐ TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE To develop an effective, multi‐year program that identifies and prioritizes transportation improvements. Projects are to be consistent with transportation plans and studies developed through the urban transportation planning process. The program is fiscally and air quality constrained.
METHODOLOGY 1) The TIP is a fiscally constrained planning document that provides a complete listing of all intended
federally funded or regionally significant transportation projects for a four‐year period. The current TIP was adopted in April 2015 that covers the planning horizon of fiscal years 2016 ‐ 2019. Staff continues to monitor projects in the TIP and attends project review meetings conducted by ODOT, KYTC and INDOT. Staff works with ODOT‐District 8 to lock‐down projects for the upcoming fiscal year and INDOT‐Seymour District for Early Consultation of highway projects planned for Dearborn County (conducted under 685.1)
2) The TIP is a dynamic document that requires numerous amendments and modifications during a fiscal year. Staff remains responsive to the needs of the program and prepares amendments and administrative modifications to the TIP as needed. The OKI Intermodal Coordinating Committee reviews TIP amendments and makes recommendations to the OKI Executive Committee or the Board of Directors. The ICC approves TIP Administrative Modifications as outlined in OKI Resolution 2014‐04 adopted by the Board of Directors on 1/9/14.
3) Staff will continue to refine the web‐based tools that allow the public to search the OKI TIP in an interactive manner. The online TIP (TIP on demand) has been updated since its inception to be more user‐friendly and a smart phone app has been developed and updated for the OKI TIP.
4) OKI will prioritize projects in the OKI region seeking TRAC funds. 5) Staff continues to prepare an annual list of obligated highway, transit and planning projects federally
funded in accordance with 23 U.S.C. § 450.332. 6) Annually the MPO is required to self‐certify that the agency is conducting the requirements of the
3C Planning process required under Title 23. 7) MAP‐21 began and FAST Act continues the requirement that MPO Plans and TIP’s incorporate
performance management processes via national, state and regional goals.
PRODUCTS 1) Development of the new FY 2018 – 2021 TIP (6/30/17). Staff will monitor and expedite projects in
the region using OKI allocated federal funds through meetings with ODOT, KYTC, INDOT and local sponsors; work with ODOT District 8 to lock‐down projects for fiscal years 2018 and 2019. (as necessary)
2) TIP Amendments and TIP Administrative Modifications. (as necessary) 3) Continued refinement of the TIP on Demand on the OKI website and the smart mobile device
applications. (as necessary) 4) Regional prioritization of TRAC applicant projects. (as necessary) 5) An annual listing of obligated highway, transit and planning projects funded with federal funds will
be published within 90 days of the end of the state fiscal year for Ohio and Indiana projects (9/30/16) and within 90 days of the end of the federal fiscal years for Kentucky projects (12/31/16).
6) Annual self‐certification of the metropolitan planning process (5/17) 7) The TIP will include transportation performance measures which will be tracked and evaluated over
time.
16
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The UPWP budget includes funding for one staff member to attend the Ohio Planning Conference in 2016.
17
605 ‐ SURVEILLANCE
OBJECTIVE Develop and maintain, on the appropriate update cycle, the basic data and geographical information systems (GIS) essential to transportation planning activities. Such a database represents current conditions within the region and permits comparison to previous as well as forecast periods to determine the impact of changing development and travel patterns. Develop and maintain a travel model capable of estimating current trip making behavior and travel patterns as well as assessing the impacts of proposed changes in land uses, transportation system, travel demand management strategies, and transportation control measures.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Maintain and update transportation system inventory data. The regional database includes
transportation supply characteristics. 2) Update travel data. Trip making data was collected for a sample of the households in the region and
traffic count data is collected throughout the spring, summer, and fall. The data included household characteristics, trips made and their characteristics (trip purpose, mode, time, etc.). Staff will continue to collect and analyze data and utilize it for travel demand model design and calibration. OKI will contract with consultants for data collection activities required for travel modeling and transportation planning studies.
3) Maintain, refine and enhance OKI travel demand, air quality models, and data processing models to represent state‐of‐the‐practice capabilities. The activities involved include streamlining model operation, improving data summary tabulation/plotting/reporting capability, evaluating and improving model methodologies, updating/refining the model equations based on the trip origin‐destination data collected from surveys and updating model documents. OKI will continue to participate in a review capacity of a project lead by ODOT to develop an activity‐based travel model known as the Ohio Disaggregate Modeling System (ODMS) for five large MPOs in the state. This travel demand forecasting model will be developed using the latest specifications and estimate, calibrate and validate the ODMS for OKI, MVRCP, MORPC, LCATS and NOACA using 2010 data. Continue development of an integrated workflow between the travel demand model and OKI’s GIS.
4) The most current state data center (Ohio Department of Development Services, Kentucky State Data Center, Indiana Business Research Center) county level population control totals will be used in air quality conformity determination and travel demand modeling procedures. Track zonal level residential and commercial development activity to identify areas of growth and/or change in land use.
5) Assist U.S. Census Bureau in census work. OKI will assist the Census Bureau in providing data, processing census data and reviewing census products. OKI will develop expertise in utilizing Census products in order to respond to census related data requests from local government, business, academia and the public.
6) Plan for access to essential services and “Ladders of Opportunity,” including multi‐modal transportation connectivity gap analyses and plan to address identified gaps in service to underserved populations with an emphasis on low income and minority populations. Other underserved populations will be evaluated as feasible.
7) Maintain licensing and technical support for GIS software through an Enterprise License Agreement with ESRI. Attend annual ESRI user conference, state GIS conferences, local GIS user group meetings, and other GIS training as needed. Upgrade GIS hardware as required.
18
8) Continue development and/or refinement of GIS databases and maps to support transportation planning elements.
9) Develop additional internet and/or intranet web mapping applications to display OKI GIS database information.
10) OKI will continue enhancement of traffic simulation capabilities including its application to selected sub‐areas as appropriate. Purchase additional software and hardware to incorporate technological advancements into the simulation process. Maintain technical expertise in the latest advancements in travel modeling and traffic simulation by participating in user conferences and other training as appropriate.
11) The OKI GIS is the primary data warehouse for many regional datasets related to transportation. As such OKI is a valuable resource within the regional community as it relates to safety and security for transportation infrastructure. OKI staff will explore ways to continue and if appropriate, expand its role as a regional data source for such critical datasets.
12) Investigate additional opportunities for collecting crowd sourced data.
PRODUCTS 1) Updated transportation system characteristics data files, including updated highway network, transit
network, and other transportation supply data files. (on‐going) 2) Updated travel data files, including traffic counts and transit ridership figures. Contract(s) for data
collection. Maintain traffic counting equipment and capabilities (potentially by purchasing additional equipment). (on‐going)
3) An updated, refined, and enhanced four‐step travel demand, air quality model, data processing routines. Implementation and testing of an activity‐based travel model known as the Ohio Disaggregate Modeling System (ODMS) (ODOT contract). Streamlined internal workflow for presenting model data. (on‐going)
4) Revised zonal socioeconomic files for 2015, 2020, 2030, 2040 (as needed). 5) Providing support to the U.S. Census Bureau and processing of data requests from local governments,
citizens and others (as requested). 6) Develop a framework for “Ladders of Opportunity.” Develop criteria for identifying underserved
populations, essential services, available data sources and techniques for evaluating gaps in service. Create geodata and document program approach. (6/17)
7) Up‐to‐date GIS software. (6/17) 8) Updated geographic databases. (on‐going) 9) New online web mapping applications. (as needed) 10) Traffic simulation products in support of overall planning process. Enhanced 3‐D visualization
presentations and techniques. (as appropriate) 11) Participation in regional homeland security efforts such as the Emergency Preparedness
Collaborative. Improved GIS data sharing and collaboration within the regional homeland security community including presentation to stakeholders and community leaders and funding agencies as appropriate. (on‐going)
12) Crowd sourced data collection applications. (as needed)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1) Three staff members to attend the TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference. (5/17) 2) One staff member to attend the Citilabs Futura User Conference (11/16) 3) Two staff members to attend the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (1/17) 4) Two staff members to attend the ESRI Developer’s Summit (3/17)
19
5) One staff member to attend two unspecified Census‐related workshops 6) Two staff members to attend the Ohio GIS Conference and two members to attend the Kentucky GIS
Conference (9‐10/16) 7) Contingency for GIS software training for staff
20
610.1 ‐ LONG RANGE PLANNING: SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
OBJECTIVE To invest transportation resources in improving the management and operation of the transportation system through continued cooperation, communication and coordination.
METHODOLOGIES 1) The Regional Transportation Plan was updated in June 2016. In FY 2017 the Plan will be amended as
necessary. As part of the Plan, Performance Measure reporting will continue in compliance with the requirements of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP‐21) and continued by FAST. OKI will host the federal certification review team for review of the OKI planning processes.
2) Metropolitan planning organizations like OKI must maintain a focus on managing the existing infrastructure. OKI will work with all levels of agencies and the public to discuss how all modes in the existing system can be managed and operated more efficiently. OKI will continue to participate in regional, state and national forums to identify procedures for addressing federal and state planning requirements including Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. OKI will educate and assist local public agencies on the requirements of ADA. OKI will pursue regional models of cooperation by promoting cooperation and coordination across agency boundaries.
3) For measuring system performance and providing data for the congestion management process (CMP), OKI will continue to collect and exploit traffic quality information of roadways in the 1,173 mile CMP network. The traffic information includes a combination of data from OKI’s travel demand model, intersection turning movement counts at selected key regional intersections, speed data provided by FHWA National Performance Management Research Data Set (HERE), ODOT (INRIX) and KYTC, and travel time information collected by OKI. OKI travel time collection will be limited to locations where FHWA, ODOT and KYTC speed data is insufficient. Following each 4‐year data collection cycle, a CMP Findings and Analysis Report will be completed. The next report is due in November 2019. The report evaluates the CMP network based on established performance measures and recommends appropriate strategies to address deficient locations. The findings contained in the report will continue to be integrated into the TIP and regional transportation planning processes and be consistent with MAP‐21 and FAST requirements.
4) Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) are electronics, communications, and information processing used singly or integrated to improve the efficiency or safety of surface transportation. An ITS Architecture (ITSA) defines how systems functionally operate and the interconnection of information exchanges that must take place between these systems to accomplish transportation services. All federally‐funded ITS projects must conform to a Regional ITS Architecture that meets all requirements of the federal ITS Architecture and Standards rule. OKI maintains the Regional Architecture and ITS Plan and periodically makes updates in response to changes in federal or state rules and to add or revise projects. OKI updated the ITSA and strategic plan in June 2016.
5) OKI staff is active in transportation planning studies in the region. This element provides for start‐up activities for new corridor studies managed by OKI or studies not managed by OKI but where staff participation is appropriate. It also provides for special studies or analysis to assist communities to more fully evaluate the impacts of transportation projects and programs. Staff will continue to participate in a regional discussion group that is investigating transit opportunities. Staff will continue to participate in and support the Eastern Corridor and the Brent Spence Bridge program of projects. Staff will continue to produce project related information and news for all levels of public involvement.
21
6) OKI will maintain and update crash data on the transportation system to monitor existing conditions. Staff will develop safety performance measures in cooperation with the state DOT’s. Database and GIS software will be utilized to locate high crash concentrations and segments of roadway with high crash rates. Performance of a limited number of safety studies for ODOT and other agencies will be conducted as resources permit. Support the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) by coordinating efforts with KYTC, ODOT and INDOT in executing their State Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSP).
7) OKI will provide project level traffic forecasts, turning movements and traffic simulation as requested utilizing the regional travel model and other software as appropriate.
8) Staff will continue to engage the multi‐modal freight community and explore opportunities to partner. Planning activities related to the identification of freight transportation needs and solutions. Freight demands offer OKI the opportunity to partner with regional partners who are active in economic development pursuits to leverage transportation investments in a way that enhances the public good.
9) Staff will build upon previous research conducted in Fiscal Years 2015 and 2016 to integrate a “Security” mechanism (addressing infrastructure vulnerability and resiliency) into the OKI project prioritization process as a good practice measure recommended by the FAST Act.
10) OKI will consult with appropriate state and local experts responsible for environmental protection, conservation, natural resources, stormwater management, land use planning and historically significant sites to consider effects of the transportation plan, as required by FAST. This includes the consideration of environmental effects in its planning process through consultations that involve a comparison of the proposed transportation plan with environmental information and a discussion of potential environmental strategies that are regional in scope. OKI will continue to support efforts that advance transportation and/or regional planning activities which rely upon and/or provide enhancement to the OKI environmental resource data, including certain Green Umbrella activities and the region’s Taking Root campaign. OKI will explore methods to best integrate tourism and natural disaster risk reduction, as encouraged by FAST, into the ongoing consultations. OKI will continue examining the relationship between transportation, climate change and livability. Staff will continue to explore the potential performance measures and data needs associated with climate change and livability.
PRODUCTS 1) Amendments to the OKI 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (as necessary). Appropriate Performance
Measures reporting will be conducted and recorded (ongoing). Host the federal and state transportation agencies for federal certification review (12/2016).
2) Coordination with ODOT, KYTC, local governments, major transit agencies, public ports and private transportation providers on options for improving the management and operation of the existing transportation system and future improvements. Participation in regional, state and national forums on transportation planning issues, including updates of state DOT transportation plans and other cross jurisdictional transportation cooperative planning activities. Education and assistance on ADA requirements to local public agencies (ongoing).
3) Ongoing performance‐based Congestion Management Program. Speed data from FHWA, ODOT and KYTC will be integrated into the current OKI travel time database. OKI will collect intersection turning movement counts at key locations within Northern Kentucky. OKI travel time collection using OKI vehicles may occur if needed (ongoing).
4) ITS architecture and ITS Strategic Plan maintenance (as necessary).
22
5) Project development activities for future transportation corridor or special studies including but not limited to benefit/cost analysis, bus rapid transit, Eastern Corridor etc. (as appropriate).
6) Identification of high crash concentrations locations (as needed). Performance of a limited number of safety studies for stakeholders as requested and resources permit. Cooperation with ODOT, KYTC in the review of their SHSP (as needed). Safety performance measures and targets monitoring and reporting (on‐going).
7) Project level traffic forecasts, turning movements and traffic simulation as requested utilizing the regional travel model and other software as appropriate.
8) Continued outreach and coordination with private and public freight and economic development stakeholders. Development of the freight component of the regional transportation system. Identify the OKI Critical Urban Freight Corridors in consultation with each state’s freight staff.
9) Revised OKI Prioritization process incorporating metrics to track security (06/17). 10) Consultations with multidisciplinary agencies on the development of the transportation plan and
continued discussion of potential environmental strategies that are regional in scope. Staff will explore methods to integrate tourism and natural disaster risk reduction with the transportation plan. Staff will identify and research potential performance measures and data needs associated with regional environmental resources, climate change, and livability. Continue to inform local governments of ADA Transition Plan requirements. (ongoing)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1) Two members to attend the Ohio Planning Conference (7/16) 2) One member to attend the Ohio Conference on Freight (8/16) 3) One staff member to attend the Ohio Traffic Engineering Conference (10/16) 4) One staff member to attend the APA National Conference (5/17) 5) One staff member to attend an unspecified freight/economic development‐related conference 6) One staff member to attend the TRB Planning Applications Conference (5/17)
23
610.4 – LONG RANGE PLANNING: LAND USE
OBJECTIVE To maintain and implement the Strategic Regional Policy Plan (SRPP) and strengthen the linkage between transportation policy and land use. Provide guidance and assistance to local governments as local comprehensive planning efforts occur and as local standards and development criteria are created. METHODOLOGIES 1) Continue education efforts about regional land use trends on traffic congestion, air quality, travel
times, and energy consumption. Target audiences will include local elected and appointed officials, planners, developers, and government decision‐makers. Consultation with state and local land use agencies responsible for land use management, natural resources, environmental protection, conservation, historic preservation, and travel and tourism will occur.
2) Continue implementation of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan by refining and continuing distribution and transition to interactive digital format of local comprehensive plan guidance, sample ordinances and collateral materials, such as surveys and research products about neighborhood redevelopment, economic vitality and best practices for improving community livability and sustainability. Provide technical assistance and encourage the use of these resources in order to promote land use patterns consistent with the SRPP Issues, Goals, Objectives and Policy Recommendations.
3) Promote the use of the OKI Fiscal Impact Analysis Model to communities throughout the OKI region and other regions.
4) Research and compile information to establish a source of reference and guidance materials for local governments regarding best practices with emphasis on regionally appropriate environmental strategies including stormwater strategies.
PRODUCTS 1) Documentation of presentations and consultations about the land use/transportation relationship,
trends and distributed materials. (ongoing) 2) Maintained www.HowDoWeGrow.org SRPP website with current regional trends and conditions
related to the SRPP, transition all SRPP related guidance tools for online interactive use, research materials to maintain relevancy and supplement as necessary the comprehensive plan guidance about neighborhood redevelopment, economic vitality and sustainability best practices. Updated website and documentation of distribution of local comprehensive plan guidance, sample ordinances, and collateral materials and of technical assistance provided. (ongoing)
3) Documentation of Fiscal Impact Analysis Model promotion. (ongoing) 4) Improved OKI Greenspace Office webpage including compiled materials and links to relevant
resources available to inform local governments on environmental best practices. (ongoing)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The UPWP budget includes three staff members to attend the National American Planning Association Conference (4/17), one staff member to attend the National Smart Growth Conference (2/17), three staff members to attend state APA Planning Conference (9/16).
24
610.5 – FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS MODEL
OBJECTIVE To continue to maintain and refine the OKI Fiscal Impact Analysis Model (FIAM). Transportation investment stimulates economic development and land use change. The FIAM implements a recommendation of OKI’s Strategic Regional Policy Plan by increasing local governments’ understanding of the costs and benefits of development. The FIAM helps local governments to capitalize on the potential land use changes related to these transportation investments by analyzing the costs and benefits of alternative land use scenarios. The FIAM uses local government budgetary, land use, population and employment statistics to estimate costs and revenues of development using current local government budget data.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Continue to provide technical assistance to existing users. 2) Manage the process of incorporating additional user data into OKI’s Fiscal Impact Analysis Model. 3) Research and develop Fiscal Impact Analysis Model refinements and expanded functionality deemed
necessary and appropriate as the FIAM continues to be used by local governments. PRODUCTS 1) Documentation of technical assistance provided. (ongoing) 2) Additional data and analysis for new partners using the fiscal impact analysis model (as appropriate) 3) Documentation of expanded functionality (as appropriate)
25
611.5 – FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS MODEL – WEB‐BASED MAINTENANCE & STARTUP
OBJECTIVE To continue to manage, maintain and improve the website operating the Fiscal Impact Analysis Model (FIAM). The web‐based version of the FIAM enables users to access and utilize the FIAM online and requires continued maintenance to ensure the data used for FIAM calculations is current. The web‐based FIAM is designed to allow users to save work for future reference requiring the ongoing management of saved information for individual users. In order to ensure the maximum utilization of the web‐based interface, improvements and upgrades are frequently necessary. The web‐based FIAM also requires adjustments as new partners communities join the program. METHODOLOGIES 1) Staff will coordinate with consultant to maintain the web‐based FIAM and back‐up data on a regular
schedule. 2) Staff will coordinate with consultant to update user data to the web‐based FIAM as necessary. 3) Staff will coordinate with consultant to upload data to the web‐based FIAM for new partner
communities.
PRODUCTS 1) A continuously functioning and accessible web‐based Fiscal Impact Analysis Model. (ongoing) 2) A report citing the users updated and the type of information including financial, demographic,
and/or geographic, updated for each user, as applicable. (ongoing) 3) Creation of new data sets for each new partner community. (as appropriate)
26
625.2 – TRANSPORTATION SERVICES: PARTICIPATION PLAN
OBJECTIVE To incorporate Title VI and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 along with other environmental justice (EJ) concerns to ensure the participation of people who are traditionally underserved into OKI’s planning process. OKI will continue to implement a Participation Plan (PP) using traditional methodologies where appropriate, but will expand techniques and explore the use of other methodologies relative to the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, especially the traditionally underserved, regardless of race, color, national origin, age, disability or income.
PREVIOUS WORK OKI has developed a comprehensive Title VI based policy relative to EJ concerns of the traditionally underserved and established an Environmental Justice Advisory Committee to assist staff with the implementation of its PP in all transportation planning projects. An update to the PP was adopted by the OKI Board of Directors in January 2014. OKI continues to update its DBE Certified Vendor Directory and Bid List and solicit additional DBE certified vendors. METHODOLOGIES 1) Update, maintain and execute the PP and its strategies and plans for OKI studies and programs. The
effectiveness of the PP will be periodically reviewed. 2) Enhance the participation process; strengthen community‐based partnerships, and provide EJ
populations recognized by OKI with opportunities to learn about and improve the quality and usefulness of various transportation modes.
3) Facilitate DBE/SBE participation in OKI contracting opportunities. 4) Work with the Intermodal Coordinating Committee to develop criteria and measurement tools for
EJ components when evaluating STP, TA and CMAQ projects to be advanced through the planning process.
5) Coordinate and execute OKI internal and external communications activities involving transportation issues to the public, media, elected representatives and government officials as well as business associations and industry‐related organizations to enhance and support OKI’s transportation planning processes.
PRODUCTS 1) An updated PP, Title VI and customized outreach plans, including social media activities as
appropriate, for OKI studies and projects as needed. 2) Annual program compliance review will be conducted. (6/17) 3) RFPs and RFQs will be disseminated to OKI’s DBE / SBE Certified Vendor Directory and Bid List. 4) Input will be provided to the TIP and Plan project evaluation process to ensure proper consideration
is given to underserved communities. 5) Public outreach, collateral materials, provide and received industry related knowledge and
education. (6/17)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1) The UPWP budget includes one staff to attend the COMTO conference. (7/16) 2) The UPWP budget includes one staff to attend an unspecified social media conference. (4/17)
27
665.4 – SPECIAL STUDIES: REGIONAL CLEAN AIR PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE To continue the Regional Clean Air Program designed to reduce outdoor pollution levels through outreach and education in order to protect public health, the local economy and attain national ozone and particulate matter standards.
METHODOLOGIES 1) OKI will continue outreach and education efforts within the region. Although smog season is primarily from
May to September, the program will work throughout the year to develop its “do your share for cleaner air” message as well as educate audiences on particulate matter issues. Since smog reduction can be achieved through a variety of actions, several audiences will be targeted including the local media, government and businesses, citizens and employers. Event marketing, advertising, social media, public relations and other avenues of creating awareness will be utilized.
OKI’s Clean Air Program addresses ozone and particulate matter pollution issues. The Greater Cincinnati area is in non‐attainment for the 8‐hour ozone and annual PM2.5 standards. This multi‐faceted campaign targets Greater Cincinnati citizens, media, local governments and businesses. The “Air Quality Advisory” fax and email system notifies approximately 1,500 contacts when an advisory is issued due to either high ozone or particulate matter pollution levels. This advanced notification system allows companies to notify their employees as to the actions they can take to reduce air pollution production. Many organizations have taken voluntary measures and made operations changes to reduce pollution formation. In addition, this notification system also allows the media to report to the public that an Air Quality Advisory has been called. It provides the local meteorologists with the information they need to include the advisory in their weather forecasts. Each television station has made the air quality index a part of their forecasts. The message is then carried forward to the general public including the voluntary measures they can take to reduce emissions such as combining trips, riding the bus, carpooling or biking.
The primary goal of the public outreach campaign is to improve the quality of the air in the Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky area by continuing to educate the general public, businesses and the media about air pollution (ozone and particulate matter pollution), their contributions to it, and the voluntary measures they can take to help reduce air pollution formation. Clean air continues to be a critical issue for the Greater Cincinnati area. Concerns related to the health and well‐being of the citizens as well as economic factors drive this issue to the forefront of regional issues. Addressing these concerns through innovative educational and informational campaigns is a priority for OKI.
Budget for marketing the Clean Program is $198,914. The message is conveyed through a variety of tactics including
Air Quality Advisory notifications when either high levels of ozone or particulate matter pollution are expected
Informational/marketing/educational materials
Comprehensive advertising campaign
Event participation PRODUCTS 1) An outreach program geared toward the reduction of pollutants in the eight county urban airshed. (ongoing)
28
667.1 – COMMUTER ASSISTANCE SERVICES: RIDESHARE
OBJECTIVE To provide Surface Transportation Block Grant Set‐aside Program to commuters within the Tristate area; thereby promoting energy conservation, reducing traffic and pollution, saving money and helping to preserve the quality of life for those who live in the OKI region.
METHODOLOGIES 1) RideShare will maintain a current, accurate database of participants, their origin and destination
points, work hours and other key information. Match‐lists will be provided to applicants by the following business day.
2) The OKI RideShare program promotes alternative transportation such as carpooling, vanpooling and public transportation. This is accomplished by providing information and financial incentives to individuals and companies.
3) The Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) program provides registered carpoolers, vanpoolers and transit customers with a ride home in emergency situations at a minimal cost.
4) The marketing of the program will be evaluated based on cost and effectiveness. Public awareness of the program will be raised through community and special events and employer presentations.
PRODUCTS 1) A detailed report of database activities such as additions and counts of applicants provided with
match‐lists. (on‐going) 2) Retain existing vanpools through rider recruitment and form new vanpools. (on‐going) 3) An accurate GRH database and an efficient reimbursement program. (on‐going) 4) Execution of an annual marketing plan outlining the most effective approaches to increase
awareness and participation in all aspects of the OKI RideShare program. (on‐going)
29
674.1/674.2 – JARC/NEW FREEDOM COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN
OBJECTIVE The objective of this program is to continue the management requirements of special transit programs for job access and reverse commute, JARC Program (Section 5316), and the New Freedom Program (Section 5317) that were originally funded under SAFETEA‐LU. OKI was the designated recipient for these two federal programs. The funds will be used for management of remaining sub‐recipients as well as an update to the OKI Coordinated Public Transit‐Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan).
PREVIOUS WORK OKI was named the designated recipient for the Cincinnati urbanized area during FY2007 by the Governors of Ohio and Kentucky. OKI first developed the Coordinated Plan in 2007 with an update during FY 2012. The Coordinated Plan was last updated during FY 2016 through the use of public surveys, surveys of transportation providers and a public meeting to gather input directly from participants. The latest version of the Coordinated Plan was adopted in May 2016.
An Oversight Team provides guidance in managing the JARC and New Freedom programs, as well as the Section 5310 Program. OKI staff time for processing invoices from sub‐recipients is funded through this work element. Payments for the transportation services provided by the sub‐recipients come directly from the New Freedom pass through grants.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Hold meetings of the Oversight Team, as needed, to provide guidance and oversight in managing
existing JARC, New Freedom and Section 5310 Programs in the region. Meetings with sub‐recipients, as needed, to effectively manage the New Freedom projects that OKI directly manages.
2) Update of the existing Coordinated Plan which was last updated in fiscal year 2016. 3) Prepare quarterly progress reports for FTA describing the status of projects funded with JARC and
New Freedom grants. Sub‐recipients prepare monthly progress reports to OKI indicating how they are complying with federal reporting requirements, which are included in the template supplied to the sub recipients.
PRODUCTS 1) Meetings of the Oversight Team and other recipients of JARC and New Freedom federal funds. (as
needed) 2) Updates to the Coordinated Plan. (as needed) 3) Prepare quarterly progress reports in the TrAMS system of FTA (quarterly) which include information
from sub‐recipients.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The UPWP includes a contingency for one staff to attend a currently undetermined professional development activity related to FTA reporting requirements.
30
674.3 – SECTION 5310 PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE The objective of this program is to provide a means for distributing Section 5310 federal funds allocated to the Cincinnati urbanized area. These funds are used by many private, non‐profit agencies to acquire vehicles for transportation services offered to their clients.
PREVIOUS WORK OKI has been involved with the Ohio Section 5310 program for many years; during some of those years a sub‐allocation of Section 5310 federal funds was provided to the Cincinnati urbanized area. In more recent years, OKI has reviewed and ranked Section 5310 applications from private, non‐profit agencies located in Butler, Clermont or Hamilton counties in Ohio and Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties in Kentucky.
OKI developed a Joint Cooperative Agreement with SORTA for the Section 5310 Program. The agreement specifies that OKI will handle the solicitation, review and awarding of Section 5310 federal funds while SORTA will handle the procurement process to purchase vehicles off the Ohio State Contract and provide continuing control of the vehicles until they reach the end of their useful life.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Hold meetings of the Oversight Team, as needed, to provide guidance and oversight for the Section
5310 program. The Oversight Team also reviews the JARC and New Freedom programs. 2) Update the application process for soliciting, reviewing and ranking applications from eligible
agencies as needed. Projects recommended for funding will be presented to the OKI Board of Directors/Executive Committee for approval.
3) Staff will prepare quarterly progress reports in TrAMS for the OKI administrative portion of the project.
4) The OKI Coordinated Public Transit‐Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) was updated during FY 2016. This document is the basis for awarding Section 5310 federal funds.
PRODUCTS 1) Meetings of the Oversight Team. (as needed) 2) Update the Section 5310 application packet (as needed) and hold a workshop to explain the
application process. (September 2016) 3) Prepare quarterly progress reports in the TrAMS system of FTA. 4) Revisions to the Coordinated Plan. (as needed) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The UPWP includes a contingency for one staff to attend a currently undetermined professional development activity related to the Section 5310 program.
31
674.4 – NEW FREEDOM PASS THROUGH
OBJECTIVE The objective of this program is to continue the management of special transit programs for elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities under the New Freedom Program (Section 5317) as originally required under SAFETEA‐LU.
PREVIOUS WORK OKI was named the designated recipient for the Cincinnati urbanized area during FY2007 by the Governors of Ohio and Kentucky. During FY2016, OKI updated the OKI Coordinated Public Transit‐Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) for the OKI Region. Payments for the transportation services provided by the sub‐recipients come directly from the New Freedom pass through grants.
METHODOLOGIES 1) OKI, as the designated recipient for New Freedom funds, is responsible for managing the projects
operated by entities in the region providing transportation services for disabled persons but not identified as “designated recipients” under FTA regulations. OKI serves as the oversight agency to ensure all federal requirements are met by sub‐recipients of New Freedom funds. Towne Taxi continues to operate a taxi voucher program in the Cincinnati urbanized area funded with New Freedom Federal Funds. During FY 2016 New Freedom grants were closed for two agencies that provided transportation services in the Cincinnati urbanized area—Community Cab and Senior Services of Northern Kentucky. OKI will pass through funds to the remaining participating transportation provider and collect monthly progress reports for the taxi voucher program. The monthly progress reports are used by OKI staff to prepare the quarterly progress reports submitted to the Federal Transit Administration’s TrAMS system.
PRODUCTS 1) Oversight, funding and requisite reporting for the provision of transportation services to people with
disabilities operated by private providers. (Ongoing)
32
674.5 MASS TRANSIT EXCLUSIVE: SORTA PLANNING STUDIES
OBJECTIVE Conduct planning and programming activities to advance the scope and quality of transit service to users within the SORTA service area.
METHODOLOGIES SORTA will conduct short term fixed‐route transit planning efforts in Hamilton County and the greater Cincinnati urbanized area. Long term transit planning efforts, particularly those involving modes other than fixed route bus, will likely be multi‐jurisdictional efforts. SORTA will also participate in key local and regional planning studies and OKI’s Intermodal Coordinating Committee and work with other transit systems in the region to advance transit improvement goals.
PRODUCTS 1) Monitor Existing Fixed‐route Service – Monitor existing service to determine strengths and
weaknesses; design and analyze potential improvements within context of current funding and available equipment. If additional funding is identified, SORTA will evaluate implementing elements of the Go Forward transit plan and subsequent updates to that plan.
2) Transit Center Development – SORTA will complete design work for transit centers in Northside, Oakley, and Walnut Hills. Construction of these projects will be initiated.
3) Rail Projects – Assist SORTA's Rail Services Manager in various safety and security, operational and other activities associated with the Cincinnati Modern Streetcar project. Complete grants management and reporting requirements for federal and state funds awarded to City of Cincinnati for this project. Continue to monitor and maintain bridges, tunnels, and pedestrian facilities along the Oasis and Blue Ash railroad right‐of‐way. Initiate design planning for highest priority repairs identified in annual bridge inspections. Work to securing funding for repairs.
4) Corridor and Transportation Study Participation and Assistance – Continue to participate in corridor studies and other major transportation initiatives including the Eastern Corridor Transportation Improvement and Oasis Commuter Rail studies, I‐75 interchange reconstruction, I‐71/ML King interchange, and the Oasis and Wasson Way bike trail projects.
5) Work with OKI to provide administrative assistance for vehicle procurement and vehicle state of good repair for the region’s 5310 program.
6) Coordinate with partners at OKI and the federal and state levels to develop performance measures and targets consistent with the requirements of FAST.
33
674.6 MASS TRANSIT EXCLUSIVE: TANK PLANNING STUDIES
OBJECTIVE Conduct planning and programming activities to increase the transit system efficiency and advance the quality of transit service to users within the TANK service area.
METHODOLOGIES In FY2017, TANK will continue with the implementation of the Network Study recommendations, including service improvements and infrastructure enhancements. As in every year, TANK will apply performance measures through its route review processes and participate in key local and regional planning studies to advance transit improvement goals.
PRODUCTS 1) Performance Analysis‐ TANK will conduct the calendar year Substandard Route Review (SSRR) by
collecting route‐level data and applying the following performance measures: Net Cost per Passenger Trip, Cost Recovery, Passenger Trips per Revenue Mile, and Passenger Trips per Revenue Hour. The SSRR allows TANK to identify underperforming routes and make informed decisions on service improvements. In addition, TANK monitors route‐level productivity (Ridership per Revenue Hour) on a monthly basis through the Planning Dashboard.
2) Transit Service Improvements– TANK will continue the implementation of the 2013 Network study recommendations. Changes will be implemented in conjunction with further public engagement, market research, and service performance analysis.
3) Covington Transit Center Renovation‐ in FY2017 TANK will complete the revitalization of its main bus station in downtown Covington. The project, which is slated to begin in August, includes significant improvements in lighting, signage, passenger amenities, and overall aesthetic.
4) Technology Improvements – TANK is in the final steps of data organization in order to provide real‐time information to our riders. Additionally, we are hoping to implement a reloadable “smart card” fare system in FY2017.
5) NKU Hub Study‐ TANK will be working with Northern Kentucky University to improve the passenger amenities and to create a center for transit activity on campus.
6) Hebron Area Flex Study – In accordance with the Network Study, TANK will study the possibilities of implementing an on‐demand circulator route in the industrial areas surrounding CVG.
7) Bus on Shoulder – following the 2014 feasibility study, in FY2017 TANK intends to start a pilot Bus on Shoulder program on I‐471, between I‐275 and KY‐8. The program will be coordinated with KYTC, the local law enforcement authorities, SORTA, and CTC.
8) Service Request Process – TANK will continue to implement the Service Request Process. This process addresses specific service needs that have been requested of TANK from the community in an effort to better serve the organization’s objectives.
9) Regional collaboration ‐ TANK will participate in, and contribute to, key local and regional planning studies, as well as the OKI’s Intermodal Coordinating Committee (ICC), Northern Kentucky planning projects, and the regional Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) initiatives.
34
674.7 ‐ MASS TRANSIT EXCLUSIVE: MIDDLETOWN TRANSIT SYSTEM (MTS) PLANNING STUDIES
OBJECTIVE MTS FY2017 planning activities will focus on strengthening county and regional partnerships to improve access for City of Middletown residents and visitors to jobs, education, medical, and other opportunities. Work will be performed in partnership with the Butler County RTA (BCRTA).
METHODOLOGIES Planning activities to be conducted by MTS in FY 2017 include: 1) Replace current fixed route fleet and keep other transit assets in a state of good repair within limited
budgeted constraints. 2) Continue partnership with BCRTA to strength countywide and regional connections. 3) Work Cincinnati State Community College, the City of Monroe and Liberty Township to explore
transit options for new and developing retail/job centers and connectivity to between Cincinnati State Campuses.
4) Integrate performance measures into strategies to improve service efficiency and effectiveness. 5) Participate in regional studies and coordination efforts at the Transit Alliance of Butler County and
OKI.
PRODUCTS 1) Fleet replacement. 2) Coordinated planning and operation efforts with BCRTA. 3) Improved access inside the Butler County I‐75 retail corridor and between Butler and Hamilton
County Cincinnati State campuses. 4) Continued compliance and coordination with FTA, ODOT and OKI regulations including the
development of performance measures and targets which will yield improved city and countywide transit connections for City of Middletown residents and visitors.
5) Participation in regional public transportation efforts (ongoing).
35
674.8 – MASS TRANSIT EXCLUSIVE: CLERMONT TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION
OBJECTIVE CTC planning activities include the evaluation of existing transit services in order to maximize efficiency and increase ridership.
METHODOLOGIES CTC will continue participation in the local and regional transit planning activities, including the OKI Intermodal Coordinating Committee. CTC will be engaged in the regional discussion about the Bus Rapid Transit plan and multi‐modal planning activities for the Eastern Corridor and Clermont County.
PRODUCTS 1) Ongoing analysis – Monitor the fixed route and dial‐a‐ride service operations for opportunities to
increase productivity and reduce costs. 2) Increase coordination with local agencies, including presentations and group meetings. 3) Identify new park and ride locations along SR 125 for the Route 4X Amelia Express. 4) Purchase new buses with security camera system. 5) Increase ridership. 6) Improvements in service efficiency. 7) Conduct a survey of CTC passengers. 8) Purchase a farebox system. 9) Participation in regional planning activities with SORTA, TANK, Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber and
OKI. 10) Coordinate with partners at OKI and the federal and state levels to develop performance measures
and targets consistent with the requirements of FAST.
36
674.9 MASS TRANSIT EXCLUSIVE: BUTLER COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (BCRTA) PLANNING STUDIES
OBJECTIVE BCRTA State FY2017 planning activities will support BCRTA Board of Trustees’ and the Transit Alliance of Butler County’s mutual efforts to identify transportation needs and leverage available resources to effectively and efficiently meet the needs.
METHODOLOGIES Locally funded planning activities that will be conducted by BCRTA in FY 2017 include: 1) Advocate a coordinated approach to publicly supported transportation services in Butler County,
e.g., continue working with Middletown Transit and Miami University to expand services by leveraging current resources.
2) Increase service availability (e.g., summer service for Oxford‐Hamilton connection) for connections among the urban centers within Butler County.
3) Increase job‐related service availability in the Hamilton and Fairfield areas. 4) Work with Miami University to develop a real time bus tracking app. 5) Continue integration of performance measures into analysis of service efficiency and effectiveness. 6) Continue upgrade of radio system to tie in with public safety. 7) Improve community awareness and appreciation of existing and new general public transit services
in Butler County. Continue participation in regional public transportation efforts. 8) Update practices and plans consistent with changes in FTA and ODOT regulations.
PRODUCTS 1) New and expanded services for target markets. 2) Increased ridership. 3) Improvements in safety and service efficiency. 4) Increased coordination of publicly funded transportation services in Butler County. 5) Continued compliance with FTA and ODOT regulations. 6) Coordinate with partners at OKI and the federal and state levels to develop performance measures
and targets consistent with the requirements of FAST.
37
674.10 – MASS TRANSIT EXCLUSIVE: WARREN COUNTY TRANSIT
OBJECTIVE Ongoing evaluation of existing transit services to maximize their efficiency. Improve everyday operations through analysis of services and how they are provided to the public. Provide service opportunities to County residents.
PREVIOUS WORK
In calendar 2015 WCTS replaced three buses and provided services to Warren County residents. Operating highlights include: 1) Provided 39,556 trips. 2) Of these trips 81% were for elderly or disabled citizens. 3) Total hours of service was 39,556 and total miles of service was 432,925. 4) Cost per revenue mile was $2.30. 5) Cost per passenger trip was $20.41.
METHODOLOGIES WCTS will continue participation in the region’s transit planning activities at OKI as a member of the ICC. WCTS will provide county‐wide service to residents with reduced fare to senior adults and qualifying disabled persons. We continue a partnership with Cincinnati Metro for funding.
PRODUCTS 1) Participation in regional planning activities at OKI. 2) Continued analysis of scope of service. 3) Continued compliance with FTA and ODOT regulations. 4) Coordinate with partners at OKI and the federal and state levels to develop performance measures
and targets consistent with the requirements of FAST.
38
684.4 – OHIO EXCLUSIVE: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION PILOT PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE To partner with the Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission (OVRDC) through the ODOT’s Regional Transportation Planning (RTPO) Pilot Program in the development of a transportation plan for the OVRDC region.
PREVIOUS WORK Since the early 1990s, the ODOT has been informally consulting with elected officials in rural Ohio in the development of the STIP. In order to formalize these communication streams and enhance the statewide planning process, ODOT is initiated a Rural Transportation Planning Organization Pilot Program which will evaluate the benefits of adding transportation planning processes to existing multi‐county regional planning agencies’ planning programs. ODOT began the Pilot Program on July 1, 2013. Since then, OKI has assisted OVRDC is preparing a participation plan, goals and objectives, socio‐economic data processing techniques and geographic information (GIS) techniques to prepare transportation data in the format needed for transportation planning purposes. FY16 included assistance in formulating a project based component of the OVRDC Transportation Plan.
METHODOLOGIES OKI will continue the participation in the development of the OVRDC Regional Transportation Plan and mentor the agency in conducting transportation planning and outreach efforts to further the planning process for their region. This would include consultation with local officials and the public and developing transportation expertise within the rural planning organization. Funding is FHWA Planning and Research matched by ODOT state funds.
PRODUCT Mentor the OVRDC. Provide ongoing discussion, collaboration, technical assistance and consultation leading to the successful development of the agency’s transportation plan for the OVRDC region. (on‐going)
39
685.1 ‐ INDIANA EXCLUSIVE: DEARBORN COUNTY TRANS. PLANNING (PL)
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work element is to conduct the core 3C planning process for Dearborn County, Indiana including the UPWP, TIP and Regional Transportation Plan.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Conduct the 3C planning process for Dearborn County, including continued active management of
the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the OKI 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (Plan), special transportation studies, the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), freight planning and other obligations including participation in the Indiana MPO Council, Annual List of Obligated Projects, and quarterly tracking reports. A Red Flag investigation will be implemented, when appropriate, prior to projects being entered into the TIP. For FY17 the integration of performance measures and targets into the Plan (and TIP) will continue in coordination with state DOT’s and transit providers. Appropriate reporting procedures and formats will be developed.
2) Work with stakeholders to continue to provide a robust, flexible and useful program for investing in and providing for a safer transportation system.
3) Provide technical assistance to Dearborn County and INDOT related to mobile source emissions. Air quality conformity determinations for are included in this element as needed. The nonattainment portion of Dearborn County includes Lawrenceburg Township, the cities of Greendale and Lawrenceburg.
4) Work cooperatively with INDOT and Dearborn Co. in the project development process to improve the cost estimating procedures and project schedules for federally funded projects.
5) Work cooperatively as appropriate, with stakeholders on the furtherance of compliance with ADA requirements. Provide technical assistance to member governments. Plan for access to essential services and “Ladders of Opportunity,” including multi‐modal transportation connectivity gap analyses and plan to address identified gaps in service to underserved populations (low income, minorities, elderly, LEP, Disabled).
6) Coordinate with INDOT regarding revised functional class designation of roadways, highway performance monitoring system (HPMS) and performance measures as part of the OKI Congestion Management Process (CMP). For measuring system performance and providing data for the CMP, OKI will continue to collect and exploit traffic quality information of major roadways in Dearborn County as part of the regional 1,173 mile CMP network. The traffic information includes a combination of data from OKI’s travel model, intersection counts, speed data provided by FHWA National Performance Management Research Data Set, and travel time information collected by OKI. OKI travel time collection will be limited to locations where FHWA speed data is insufficient. Following each 4‐year data collection cycle, a CMP Findings and Analysis Report will be completed. The report evaluates the CMP network based on established performance measures and recommends appropriate strategies to address deficient locations. The findings contained in the report will continue to be integrated into the TIP and the regional transportation plan and be consistent with FAST Act requirements.
7) Maintain the Dearborn County portion of the OKI Regional Travel Model, GIS and homeland security planning activities. Perform data collection activities to support these efforts including traffic, employment and other data as necessary.
8) The OKI Participation and Title VI plans will be maintained and executed in consultation with stakeholders to provide reasonable access to the planning process and streamlined opportunities to comment on issues before the OKI Board of Directors, elected officials, INDOT and FHWA.
40
9) Provide for project management of the implementation and maintenance of the fiscal impact assessment model (FIAM).
10) Coordinate with state and local agencies to develop information and conduct discussions that provide for environmental consultations (i.e. planning and environmental linkages) on the development of the transportation plan.
PRODUCTS 1) Incorporation of Dearborn County projects in the OKI TIP (on‐going), amended OKI 2040 Regional
Transportation Plan (as appropriate), special transportation studies, the FY2018 UPWP, Annual Completion Report (9/30/16), quarterly tracking reports with performance monitoring in cooperation with Debra Ault INDOT LPA Coordinator (on‐going), Indiana MPO Council participation, an Annual List of Obligated Projects (1/15/17), and Red Flag Investigations consistent with INDOT templates (as needed). Integration of performance measures into the Plan in coordination with state DOT’s and transit providers. (on‐going)
2) Aggressive programming of HSIP funds in local safety planning programs and projects. (on‐going) 3) Perform mobile source emission estimates and air quality conformity determinations for
Lawrenceburg Township, Greendale and Lawrenceburg. (as necessary) 4) Development of improved scheduling and cost estimating procedures in cooperation with state and
local partners. (on‐going) 5) Progress towards compliance with ADA requirements, and the advancement towards “connected”
communities and ladders of opportunity for underserved communities. Provide technical assistance to member governments. (on‐going)
6) Updated federal roadway functional class review as necessary. Participate in HPMS efforts. Ongoing performance‐based CMP. Speed data from FHWA and ODOT will be integrated into the current OKI travel time database. OKI will collect intersection turning movement counts at key locations. OKI travel time collection using OKI vehicles may occur if needed. (6/17)
7) Enhanced travel model and new GIS layers used to support transportation planning and Homeland Security planning efforts. (ongoing)
8) Maintain and execute the OKI Participation and Title VI plans. (on‐going) 9) Support services associated with the fiscal impact assessment model (FIAM). (as needed) 10) Environmental consultations on the transportation plan. (ongoing)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The budget includes 1 staff member attending the Indiana MPO Conference (9/16)
41
685.2 ‐ INDIANA EXCLUSIVE: DEARBORN COUNTY TRANS. PLANNING (STP)
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work element is to supplement elements of the 3C planning process for Dearborn County. This element will supplement the activities listed in 685.1 and include special (nonrecurring) activities and studies.
METHODOLOGIES 1) The primary activity will be project management activities and administrative services associated
with the Bright 74 Connector Study. A consultant will be retained to conduct technical services (see 685.4)
2) Maintenance and execution services associated with the OKI Fiscal impact Model in Dearborn County (as appropriate)
PRODUCTS 1) Competed Scoping Study for the Bright 74 Connector Corridor (12/16) 2) Support services associated with the fiscal impact assessment model (as needed)
42
685.4 ‐ INDIANA EXCLUSIVE – DEARBORN COUNTY STP: BRIGHT 74 STUDY
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work element is to investigate the feasibility of implementing a transportation improvement that would significantly improve the transportation system between the Bright, Indiana area to the Interstate 74 corridor. METHODOLOGIES The Dearborn County transportation system lacks a critical north/south corridor providing safe, efficient connections between the highly populated portions of Miller and Harrison townships to the Interstate 74 corridor. The 74 corridor is an underutilized east‐west asset in the northern part of county which can provide improved mobility and economic opportunity. The need is identified in the OKI 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (2012 Update) as project ID 803 and in the 2040 Plan’s 2016 Update as project ID 4450. The Bright 74 Study will investigate the feasibility of implementing a transportation improvement that would significantly improve the transportation system in the corridor connecting the Bright, Indiana area to the Interstate 74 corridor. The corridor covers more than 18 square miles, measuring approximately 6 miles in length and 3 miles wide. The Study is assumed to be classified as an Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) “Major Project” during this phase. As such, the Bright 74 Study will explore all viable modal options by following the INDOT Project Development Process (PDP) for Major Projects. Study tasks will generally follow the INDOT Project Development Manual Steps 2 through Step 5 to develop preferred alternatives, but will not include the initiation of environmental field studies, resources agency coordination or NEPA documentation. The study will require approximately 12 months. It was initiated in FY16 and will be completed in FY17
PRODUCTS 1) Completion and documentation of Steps 2‐5 of the INDOT project development process including a
prioritized list of recommended projects identified for future project development and funding. Deliverables will include the Public Involvement Plan, INDOT Design Summary; a Red Flag Summary Report; travel demand model inputs and outputs suitable for use with MCIBAS, a Conceptual Solutions Report; and a Preliminary Alternative Screening Package. (12/16)
2) The consultant’s deliverables to OKI will include base mapping, GIS and CAD files, construction cost estimates, and other secondary data developed for the study. (12/16)
43
686.2 – KENTUCKY EXCL. (PL DISCRETIONARY): BOONE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
OBJECTIVE Prepare an update of the Boone County Transportation Plan. METHODOLOGIES OKI will prepare an update to the Boone County Transportation Plan originally developed in 1996 and updated in 2005. These plans lead to successful implementation of several improvements to the transportation network including Aero Parkway and elements of the KY 237 and KY 536 corridors. This update is needed to be able to continue to respond to the impacts of continued rapid growth and development in Boone County. The goals of the study are:
Update a transportation system plan that is compatible with existing and future land uses; Improve the existing system through safety and operational improvements; Identify funding shortfalls and develop strategies to address these shortfalls
The major elements of the effort include Data Collection; Existing Conditions Analyses; Future Conditions Analyses; Evaluation of potential access improvements to I‐275 in the Graves Road area; Identification of Environmental Constraints; Development of Recommended Improvements; and a Financial Assessment.
PRODUCTS 1) A short‐term Operational Improvement Plan that involves relatively low‐cost, easily‐ implemented
safety and operational improvements; and 2) A prioritized long‐range transportation plan consisting of major projects and strategies. FUNDING OKI will use $160,000 in PL Discretionary Funds to be matched with $40,000 from the Boone County Fiscal Court.
44
686.3 – KENTUCKY EXCLUSIVE: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVE This work element is intended to respond to the need for safety, operational, special studies or data collection effort focused specifically on Northern Kentucky.
PREVIOUS WORK Previous work for Northern Kentucky has included numerous operational, mobility, efficiency and safety studies throughout Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties. In addition county‐wide transportation plans were completed for Kenton, Campbell and Boone in 2014, 2004 and 2005 respectively. In FY 2009 OKI staff developed traffic simulation for a portion of the KY‐8 corridor in Bellevue and Dayton. Also in FY 2009, the US 42 corridor in Florence was analyzed. In FY 2010, FY 2011 and FY 2012 staff developed the KY High Risk Rural Road Program pilot project for KYTC and FHWA. In FY16 OKI Staff successfully conducted the KY 536 Scoping Study which resulted in a preferred alternative for the KY 17 to Campbell County line. In addition, OKI as the MPO serving the three Northern Kentucky counties participated as vital partner in KYTC’s bi‐annual updates to the Unscheduled Project List (UPL).
METHODOLOGIES 1) Project Identification Forms (PIFs) for all Kentucky projects recommended in the 2040 OKI Regional
Transportation Plan and other transportation‐related studies must be maintained and kept current. PIFs will be maintained and revised per guidelines established by KYTC. OKI will maintain and revise the Unscheduled Projects List (UPL), for Kentucky projects identified through OKI’s planning process.
2) OKI staff avails itself to communities in the region for assistance on transportation technical and planning matters. This will include assistance to local governments regarding the LPA process and the requirements for administration of federal‐aid projects. Attend statewide planning and professional development activities.
3) Collection and processing of traffic and safety data used for planning purposes. 4) Contract management and participation in the Boone County Transportation Plan (completion date
06/17).
PRODUCTS 1) OKI will maintain current Project Identification Forms (PIFs) for all Kentucky projects recommended
in the OKI Regional Transportation Plan and other transportation‐related studies per guidelines established by KYTC. OKI will maintain and revise the Unscheduled Projects List (UPL), for Kentucky projects identified through OKI’s planning process.(on‐going)
2) Participation in planning studies and activities as appropriate. Assistance to local governments regarding the LPA process and the requirements for administration of federal‐aid projects. Participation in Statewide Planning meetings and other professional development activities with a focus on Kentucky transportation. (07/16 ‐ 06/17)
3) OKI will work with KYTC and/or contractors to collect classified traffic volumes on northern Kentucky roadways as resources permit.
4) Consultant contract management and project oversight and completion of the Boone County Transportation Plan. (06/17)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1) One staff member to attend the Kentucky Transportation Conference (01/17)
45
695 – UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE Development of the Fiscal Year 2018 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
METHODOLOGIES The Fiscal Year 2018 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) will outline the scope of work to be undertaken by OKI for the period beginning July 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2018. The document illustrates the relationship between adopted goals, objectives and program activities. It outlines the general nature of these program elements, which are summarized by general categories, and are referenced to specific projects by project number. Primarily a management tool for planning and coordination, the UPWP provides the basis for cataloging and integrating OKI's activities into general categories. It delineates the programmatic and fiscal relationships essential for internal planning and programming. Activities associated with creating the program descriptions, reproduction and dissemination are provided for under this work element. Draft UPWP will be submitted in electronic format. Final program will be printed documents when requested.
PRODUCTS 1) Draft FY2018 UPWP (3/17). 2) Updated Memorandum of Understanding among the applicable entities identifying their mutual
responsibilities per 23 CFR 450.314. (as necessary) 3) Monthly progress, annual completion, and expenditure reports. (ongoing) 4) FY2018 Unified Planning Work Program. (5/17)
46
697.1 – TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM REPORTING
OBJECTIVE To provide the public and funding agencies with a yearly transportation report summarizing the major activities of the transportation planning process.
PREVIOUS WORK OKI prepared a transportation summary for the last several years as part of the agency’s annual program reporting.
PRODUCT Transportation Annual Summary (6/17)
47
710.1 ‐ LOCAL WATER QUALITY ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVE To undertake water quality planning activities in Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana, as appropriate and as resources permit.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Continue to support watershed activities in southwestern Ohio, northern Kentucky, and Dearborn
County as requested and as resources permit. These activities may include participating in technical advisory groups; facilitating meetings; arranging for presentations, tours, and canoe outings; participating in public involvement efforts; and identifying technical and fiscal resources to implement various improvement projects.
2) Continue to provide support for the OKI Groundwater Committee, a forum that helps local governments meet state and federal mandates and promotes coordinated management of a sole source aquifer system that provides more than two‐thirds of a million people with drinking water and water for commercial, industrial, agricultural and recreational purposes.
3) Continue to provide support for the OKI Regional Conservation Council, including representatives of the Soil and Water Conservation Districts in the region.
4) Continue to refine the base information and recommendations in the OKI Regional Water Quality Management Plan for the Kentucky and Indiana portions of the region as resources permit.
PRODUCTS 1) Collateral materials for southwestern Ohio, northern Kentucky, and Dearborn County watershed
management activities, which may include education and outreach materials, fact sheets, directories, and articles in stakeholder newsletters. (as appropriate)
2) Meeting notices, agendas, summaries, and related correspondence. (as appropriate) 3) Meeting notices, agendas, summaries, and related correspondence for the OKI RCC Annual meeting
occurring in the spring and support, as needed, for the annual tour occurring in the fall. 4) Updated base information and recommendations for the OKI Regional Water Quality Management
Plan. (within resource constraints) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT The UPWP budget includes funding for two staff members to attend the annual Water Management Association of Ohio (WMAO) Conference (11/16); for one staff member to participate in one WMAO technical workshop during the year; and for one staff member to attend the annual Ohio Stormwater Conference. Staff registration at the OKI Regional Conservation Council annual meeting and other local soil and water conservation district and conservation group events are also budgeted throughout the year.
48
710.6 ‐ WATER QUALITY PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE To assess, manage, and protect surface water and groundwater resources in view of regional growth and development and the resultant increased demand.
PREVIOUS WORK OKI adopted a major Water Quality Management Plan Update for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton, and Warren Counties in Ohio in 2011 in accordance with federal and state requirements. The 2011 plan was the first comprehensive update to the Ohio portion of the Regional Water Quality Management Plan published by OKI in 1977. Since 2011 OKI has continued to update the Ohio portion of the Plan on an incremental basis, to provide local governments and their consultants with data including population and land use information, to review wastewater facility projects for consistency with the plan (which is a state and federal requirement), to inform the public of water quality issues and to assist local implementation of plan recommendations.
METHODOLOGIES 1) Monitor the Water Quality Management Plan to identify needs for amendments and/or updating. 2) Respond to requests for wastewater permit consistency reviews from Ohio EPA, local jurisdictions
and other local constituents, and pursue associated needs for amendments to the Regional Water Quality Management Plan.
3) Produce a targeted water quality improvement project and supplemental WQM Plan activity as detailed in OKI’s contract with Ohio EPA.
PRODUCTS 1) Water Quality Management Plan amendments. (as appropriate) 2) Permit consistency reviews, associated plan amendments when needed and public information
products as detailed in OKI’s contract with Ohio EPA. (as appropriate) 3) Data and analysis, summary information, maps and descriptive text generated for the targeted water
quality improvement project as detailed in OKI’s contract with Ohio EPA. (6/17)
49
710.9 ‐ WATER QUALITY PROGRAM (OHIO GENERAL ASSEMBLY)
OBJECTIVE To assess, manage, and protect surface water and groundwater resources in view of regional growth and development and the resultant increased demand.
PREVIOUS WORK OKI adopted a major Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Update for Butler, Clermont, Hamilton, and Warren Counties in Ohio in 2011 in accordance with federal and state requirements. The 2011 plan was the first comprehensive update to the Ohio portion of the Regional Water Quality Management Plan published by OKI in 1977. Since 2011 OKI has continued to update the Ohio portion of the Plan on an incremental basis, to provide local governments and their consultants with data including population and land use information, to review wastewater facility projects for consistency with the plan (which is a state and federal requirement), to inform the public of water quality issues and to assist local implementation of plan recommendations. OKI has also conducted studies and analyses and has used stream and watershed evaluations with direction from Ohio EPA to support water quality management at the local, regional and state levels. METHODOLOGIES 1) Consult with Ohio EPA on priorities for updating portions of the Regional Water Quality Management
Plan. 2) Consult with watershed organizations to identify local priorities among water quality issues and
planning needs. 3) Consult with wastewater management agencies to clarify planning needs and get consensus on plan
amendments that could affect them. 4) Prepare and present proposed WQMP plan updates and amendments for public input.
PRODUCTS 1) Summary of consultations with Ohio EPA on WQMP priorities. 2) Summary of consultations with watershed organizations about water quality issues and planning
needs. (as necessary) 3) Summary of consultations with wastewater management agencies about planning needs and plan
amendments. 4) Updated Water Quality Management Plan and associated plan amendments. (as necessary)
50
720.1 – MOBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS PLANNING
OBJECTIVE To ensure that OKI’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) contribute to the region’s attainment and maintenance of national ambient air quality (AQ) standards.
PREVIOUS WORK In May 2012, pursuant to provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated nine counties in the Cincinnati area as a marginal nonattainment area for ozone under the current ozone standard. The Cincinnati ozone nonattainment area includes Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County Indiana, portions of the Kentucky counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton, and the Ohio counties of Butler, Clermont, Clinton, Hamilton and Warren. Under the 1997 annual fine particulate (PM2.5) standard, seven counties are considered a maintenance area, whereas those counties must continue compliance with the standard. The fine particulate maintenance area includes Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County Indiana, the Kentucky counties of Boone, Campbell and Kenton, and the Ohio counties of Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and a portion of Warren. OKI has coordinated the process of developing local emission reduction strategies in support of revisions to the air quality State Implementation Plans (SIPs). OKI has provided the state agencies with mobile source emissions data for use in SIP revisions. OKI has performed transportation air quality conformity analysis for the region’s MTP and TIP, most recently for the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan in 2016. OKI has developed procedures to integrate updates to the EPA Motor Vehicle Emissions model (MOVES) into the travel modeling process. OKI has analyzed the air quality and energy benefits of all candidate transportation projects subject to OKI’s project prioritization process, as well as the Ohio statewide urban CMAQ process.
METHODOLOGIES 1) OKI will continue to coordinate with federal, state and local air quality and transportation agencies on SIP
revisions and air quality issues including but not limited to conformity determinations. OKI will remain knowledgeable about current state and federal legislation and regulations and will provide technical information and current data as requested. OKI will perform and document conformity analyses as required under the Clean Air Act Amendments and based upon criteria outlined in the USEPA Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR Part 93). OKI’s model will utilize the latest EPA software and latest planning assumptions.
2) Staff will evaluate the expected air quality and energy benefits of potential CMAQ, SNK, STP and TA funded projects utilizing the OKI travel demand model, MOVES, and accepted off‐model methodologies.
PRODUCTS 1) Ongoing coordination and consultation with OKI committees, federal, state and local agencies regarding air
quality issues. Preparation of appropriate documentation of Metropolitan Transportation Plan and TIP conformity. Provision of travel and mobile source emission data to support SIP revisions prompted by changes in local emission control programs and federal standards for ozone and particulate matter.
2) Quantification of the expected air quality and energy benefits of candidate projects for CMAQ, SNK, STP, SNK or TA funding as required.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1) One staff member to attend in‐state training opportunities.
51
800 ‐ REGIONAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVE To provide support for sustainable development through planning services, data resources, and other information useful to the government, business, and civic sectors in the OKI region. When deemed advantageous to the region, to provide contributed services to leverage additional funding for programs that advance regional planning objectives of the OKI Strategic Regional Policy Plan or Long Range Transportation Plan. METHODOLOGIES 1) Assist local governments, businesses, citizens and other parties, by providing information about the
region, including maps, census data, traffic information and OKI reports for nominal reproduction and handling fees.
2) Address development issues through research and technical assistance strategies, including working with the public, private, and civic sectors. The beneficiaries of this effort will be government agencies, taxpayers, and local businesses as each improves its capacity to evaluate and direct sustainable growth and development.
3) Provide support for the OKI Regional Planning Forum, a forum for planners in the region from multiple disciplines including land use, environmental, transportation, health, energy and education organized to encourage regional cross disciplinary collaboration and inform planners on current trends and regional initiatives.
4) Provide support for the OKI Planning Directors’ Network, a network for planning directors at county, township and municipal levels in the OKI region organized to enable efficient sharing of best practices, information on departmental and professional development and increase likelihood for multijurisdictional collaboration.
5) Continue technical assistance to local communities interested in advancing products from the Solar Ready II project completed in FY 16.
6) Provide in‐kind staff support to advance the U.S. Forestry project initiative. In FY 17, this support will include organizing and facilitating quarterly stakeholder working group meetings, assisting the working group to develop regionally specific best management practices related to integrating trees into local storm water management design.
PRODUCTS 1) Provision of various products and information. (as appropriate) 2) Analyses of national and regional land development trends, conditions, and issues; and technical
assistance on issues including land use, zoning, economic development, housing, water and sewer infrastructure, intergovernmental coordination, capital budgeting, and natural systems. (ongoing)
3) Support services for the Regional Planning Forum activities. (as appropriate) 4) Meeting agendas and related correspondence regarding Planning Directors’ Network activities. (as
appropriate) 5) Meeting materials and memos summarizing any technical assistance provided. (as appropriate) 6) Meeting agendas, meeting materials and bi‐annual progress reports prepared for the US Forestry
Project. (as appropriate)
52
500.1 – U.S. Forest Service Work Program
OBJECTIVE OKI, in partnership with the National Association of Regional Councils (NARC), Davey Resource Group (Davey), and Centerline Strategies, LLC, will complete work on the 2015 U.S. Forest Service National Urban and Community Forestry Challenge Cost‐Share Grant Award. OKI will work with NARC, Davey, and Centerline to engage decision makers, planners, and engineers in the OKI region to develop Integrating Trees Into Stormwater Management Design and Policy – A Guide for Local Decision Makers that will be promoted nationally. The product will be a resource for promoting, facilitating and increasing the use of trees for stormwater management. In spite of the proven value of trees for reducing stormwater flows and pollutants, there is widespread lack of understanding, acceptance, and credibility of their use for managing stormwater. The OKI Guide will overcome these barriers by providing a practical tool that informs local governments of options and best practices for including trees in stormwater facility design regulations and policies. OKI and its team of national partners will develop a guide that is applicable across the nation. OKI will identify the most practical solutions based on perspectives of local government in the OKI Tri‐state region. Davey Resource Group will draw upon its vast knowledge and understanding of forests and green infrastructure to ensure that the Guide is scientifically sound and feasible. Centerline Strategies will compile a national inventory of local government policies and incentives for integrating trees into stormwater management solutions. NARC will work with OKI and its other members to ensure the Guide's applicability to other regions and to promote it through NARC's national membership."
METHODOLOGIES 1) Conduct a literature review to ensure the best science and case study examples of the use of trees
in stormwater design will be conducted to inform BMP development. 2) Develop best practices for local governments’ consideration with input of a stakeholder working
group. 3) Develop promotional materials advancing the BMPs developed.
PRODUCTS 1) Bi‐Annual progress reports and quarterly financial reports. (as appropriate throughout year)
2) Best practice recommendations. (6/17)
3) Educational and promotional materials informing communities on the BMPs developed. (3/17)
FUNDING Project funding is made available by a 2015 award of the U.S. Forestry Service through the National
Urban and Community Forestry Challenge Cost‐Share Grant Program.
Appendix A
Budget
A-1
RATIONALE FOR FUNDING
The objective of the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) process is to provide a rational basis
for the development, review, approval, execution and control of a comprehensive and coordinated
transportation planning program for the OKI Region.
A number of federal, state and local organizations contribute funds to the program. Partner agencies
are also recipients of these funds and have the responsibility of completing the described program
activities. The UPWP ties the various resources, needs, interests, and responsibilities into a
coordinated annual work program.
The first phase of the process is a determination of what work elements are to be included in the
UPWP. This is based upon (1) new federal and state directions and directives, (2) continuing
requirements, and (3) local needs, interests and priorities.
Following an evaluation of which elements best serve the needs of the region, while at the same
time fulfilling the agency's objectives, a comparison of joint interest and the benefits that will be
derived is made. Based on the output of this process, a funding table is prepared for inclusion in the
UPWP. The funding agencies, in their review of the work program, make a determination of the
appropriateness of the funding level and source of funds. Comments or requests for changes are
then incorporated into a revised UPWP. Throughout the process, the basic premise of maintaining
a regional, continuing, cooperative and comprehensive planning process prevails.
The FY 2017 UPWP reflects selectivity in the allocation of funding sources to program activities. This
procedure and the subsequent matching of funding sources to program activities reflect
consideration of:
• Amount of resources available from each agency;
• Primary interest area of each funding agency;
• Potential for delays in funding by each funding agency;
• Primary interest and type of each recipient agency; and
• Desirability of maintaining a single funding arrangement for each grouping of work activities.
In summary, while it is administratively necessary and advantageous to selectively match funding
sources with work activities or groupings, the basic philosophical intent is to maintain a single
integrated comprehensive and coordinated transportation planning program that jointly serves the
needs of local, state and federal interests.
Work Performance Responsibility
All work is performed by staff except where indicated. OKI may contract with consulting firms using
OKI's procurement procedures which are consistent with 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Consultants provide
access to additional resources and expertise. Elements utilizing consultants are identified in the text
of that element. The budgeted amounts are identified within the following budget tables.
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 1 ALL ACTIVITIES BY COST OBJECTIVE AND DIRECT COST CATEGORY
Work SOURCE
Personnel Consultant Marketing Special Other Indirect & Total
Toll Credits and
Contributed Total
Element Purchase Direct Fringes Work Cost Services Project
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
601 Short Range (PL/FTA)
601 Short Range Planning
601.1 FY 2017 CPG CPG 31,030 2,769 61,661 95,460 95,460
601.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 5,910 596 11,744 18,250 18,250
602 TIP (PL/FTA)
602 Transportation Improvement Program
602.1 FY 2017 CPG CPG 39,090 1,360 77,675 118,125 118,125
602.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 7,260 893 14,427 22,580 22,580
605 Continuing Planning-Surveillance (PL/FTA)
605 Continuing Planning - Surveillance
605.1 FY 2017 CPG CPG 480,664 290,000 28,782 955,127 1,754,573 1,754,573
605.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 91,057 45,000 28,273 180,940 345,270 345,270
original submitted 02/29/2016 A-2
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 1 ALL ACTIVITIES BY COST OBJECTIVE AND DIRECT COST CATEGORY
Work SOURCE
Personnel Consultant Marketing Special Other Indirect & Total
Toll Credits and
Contributed Total
Element Purchase Direct Fringes Work Cost Services Project
610 Transportation Plan (PL/FTA)
610 Transportation Plan
610.1 Transportion Plan
610.1 FY 2017 CPG CPG 300,463 21,912 597,050 919,425 919,425
610.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 58,051 2,395 115,354 175,800 175,800
610.4 Land Use Planning
610.4 FY 2017 STP (ODOT PID #93160) STBGP 113,482 15,553 225,500 354,535 73,134 427,669
610.5 Fiscal Impact Analysis
610.5 FY 2017 STP (ODOT PID #93164) STBGP 35,248 500 70,041 105,789 21,822 127,611
611.5 FY 2017 FIAM Maintenance and Startups local 20,000 20,000 20,000
625 Services (PL/FTA)
625 Services
625.2 FY 2017 CPG CPG 104,114 2,252 206,884 313,250 313,250
625.2 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 19,241 2,406 38,233 59,880 59,880
665 Special Studies
665.4 Regional Clean Air Program
(FY17 ODOT PID #93167)
FY 2017 ODOT CMAQ / KY SNK CMAQ/STBGP 47,437 - 198,914 2,485 94,262 343,098 85,775 428,873
667 Rideshare Activities
667.1 Rideshare Program
(FY17 ODOT PID #93169)
FY 2017 ODOT CMAQ / KY SNK CMAQ/STBGP 36,775 137,422 10,050 73,077 257,324 11,250 268,574
original submitted 02/29/2016 A-3
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 1 ALL ACTIVITIES BY COST OBJECTIVE AND DIRECT COST CATEGORY
Work SOURCE
Personnel Consultant Marketing Special Other Indirect & Total
Toll Credits and
Contributed Total
Element Purchase Direct Fringes Work Cost Services Project
674 Transit
674.1 JARC (5316) FY2012 FTA 25,048 49,772 74,820 74,820
674.2 New Freedom (5317) FY2012 FTA 6,898 300 13,706 20,904 20,904
674.4 New Freedom (5317) FY2013 Pass-Thru FTA 57,807 57,807 57,807 115,614
674.1 JARC (5316) FY2010 & FY2011 FTA 27,519 300 54,682 82,501 82,501
674.3 Transit Planning Activities (5310) FFY13-14 FTA 42,445 121,908 84,343 248,696 248,696
684 Ohio Exclusive
684.4 Regional Transportation Planning Agency Program
(FY16 ODOT PID #99720)
FY2016-17 Mentor Pilot Program Research 14,290 28,396 42,686 42,686
685 Indiana Exclusive
685.1 Dearborn County (INDOT) FY2017 CPG CPG 9,909 1,650 19,691 31,250 31,250
685.2 Dearborn County (INDOT) FY2017 STP STBGP 20,786 411 41,303 62,500 62,500
685.4 Bright 74 Corridor Study FY2016 carryover STBGP 81,500 81,500 81,500
686 Kentucky Exclusive
686.3 Transportation Planning Activities FY2017 PL/FTA 44,636 2,499 88,696 135,831 135,831
686.2 Boone County Study PL Disc 200,000 200,000 200,000
original submitted 02/29/2016 A-4
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 1 ALL ACTIVITIES BY COST OBJECTIVE AND DIRECT COST CATEGORY
Work SOURCE
Personnel Consultant Marketing Special Other Indirect & Total
Toll Credits and
Contributed Total
Element Purchase Direct Fringes Work Cost Services Project
695 UPWP Administration (PL/FTA)
695 UPWP Administration
695.1 FY 2017 CPG CPG 7,708 225 15,317 23,250 23,250
695.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 1,465 75 2,910 4,450 4,450
697 Trans Program Reporting (PL/FTA)
697 Transportation Program Reporting
697.1 FY 2017 CPG CPG 5,509 15 10,946 16,470 16,470
697.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 1,053 5 2,092 3,150 3,150
720 Air Quality (PL/FTA)
720 Mobile Source Emissions Planning
720.1 FY 2017 CPG CPG 27,609 188 54,863 82,660 82,660
720.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover CPG 5,268 63 10,469 15,800 15,800
674 Mass Transit Exclusive
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA)
Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK) See Table 6, Page A-18
Middletown Transit Service (MTS)
Clermont Transportation Connection (CTC)
Butler County Regional Transit Authority (BCRTA)
Warren County Transit Service
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SUB TOTAL 1,609,965 816,215 336,336 125,957 3,199,161 6,087,634 249,788 6,337,422
original submitted 02/29/2016 A-5
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 1 ALL ACTIVITIES BY COST OBJECTIVE AND DIRECT COST CATEGORY
Work SOURCE
Personnel Consultant Marketing Special Other Indirect & Total
Toll Credits and
Contributed Total
Element Purchase Direct Fringes Work Cost Services Project
AGRICULTURAL PLANNING
500 US Forestry Activities
500.1 National Urban and Community Forestry USDA 37,531 52,430 14,619 74,579 179,159 52,430 231,589
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
710 Water Quality
710 Ohio EPA Program
710.6 FY2017 604 (b) OEPA 19,037 2,250 37,829 59,116 59,116
710.9 FY2017 Ohio General Assembly Funds OEPA 25,108 550 49,892 75,550 75,550
710.1 FY2017 Local Funded Water Activities OKI 18,244 11,488 36,253 65,985 65,985
REGIONAL PLANNING
800 Regional Planning Activities
800.1 FY2017 Local Funded Regional Planning Activities OKI 11,295 808 22,445 34,548 34,548
NON-TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SUB TOTAL 111,215 52,430 29,715 220,998 414,358 52,430 466,788
FY 2017 Totals 1,721,180 868,645 336,336 155,672 3,420,159 6,501,992 302,218 6,804,210
1FY16 ODOT CPG carryover funds to be partnered with FY17 KYTC funds
original submitted 02/29/2016 A-6
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 2 CPG (PL/FTA ) BY COST OBJECTIVE AND FUNDING SOURCE
Work Total Other Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Indiana Indiana Indiana
Element Work Cost Funding Totals Federal Match Local Totals PL KYTC Match FTA 5303 Local Totals PL Local(from Table 1)
FY 2017 CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
FY 2016 Carryover CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Exclusive PL/FTA Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Discretionary PL 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
Indiana Exclusive CPG Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
JARC/New Freedom/5310 (FTA) 100.0000% 100.0000%
601 Short Range (PL/FTA)
601 Short Range Planning
601.1 FY 2017 CPG 95,460 78,766 63,013 7,877 7,877 16,694 10,250 641 3,105 2,698
601.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 18,250 15,058 12,046 1,506 1,506 3,192 1,960 122 594 516
602 TIP (PL/FTA)
602 Transportation Improvement Program
602.1 FY 2017 CPG 118,125 97,468 77,974 9,747 9,747 20,657 12,684 793 3,842 3,339
602.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 22,580 18,631 14,905 1,863 1,863 3,949 2,425 152 734 638
605 Continuing Planning-Surveillance (PL/FTA)
605 Continuing Planning - Surveillance
605.1 FY 2017 CPG 1,754,573 1,447,739 1,158,191 144,774 144,774 306,834 188,403 11,775 57,065 49,592
605.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 345,270 284,890 227,912 28,489 28,489 60,380 37,074 2,317 11,229 9,759
610 Transportation Plan (PL/FTA)
610 Transportation Plan
610.1 Transportion Plan
610.1 FY 2017 CPG 919,425 758,639 606,911 75,864 75,864 160,786 98,726 6,170 29,903 25,987
610.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 175,800 145,057 116,045 14,506 14,506 30,743 18,877 1,180 5,718 4,969
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 7
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 2 CPG (PL/FTA ) BY COST OBJECTIVE AND FUNDING SOURCE
Work Total Other Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Indiana Indiana Indiana
Element Work Cost Funding Totals Federal Match Local Totals PL KYTC Match FTA 5303 Local Totals PL Local(from Table 1)
FY 2017 CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
FY 2016 Carryover CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Exclusive PL/FTA Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Discretionary PL 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
Indiana Exclusive CPG Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
JARC/New Freedom/5310 (FTA) 100.0000% 100.0000%
625 Services (PL/FTA)
625 Services
625.2 FY 2017 CPG 313,250 258,470 206,776 25,847 25,847 54,780 33,636 2,102 10,188 8,854
625.2 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 59,880 49,408 39,526 4,941 4,941 10,472 6,430 402 1,948 1,692
695 UPWP Administration (PL/FTA)
695 UPWP Administration
695.1 FY 2017 CPG 23,250 19,184 15,348 1,918 1,918 4,066 2,497 156 756 657
695.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 4,450 3,672 2,938 367 367 778 478 30 145 126
697 Trans Program Reporting (PL/FTA)
697 Transportation Program Reporting
697.1 FY 2017 CPG 16,470 13,590 10,872 1,359 1,359 2,880 1,768 111 536 465
697.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 3,150 2,599 2,079 260 260 551 338 21 102 89
720 Air Quality (PL/FTA)
720 Mobile Source Emissions Planning
720.1 FY 2017 CPG 82,660 68,205 54,563 6,821 6,821 14,455 8,876 555 2,688 2,336
720.1 1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 15,800 13,037 10,430 1,304 1,304 2,763 1,697 106 514 446
686 Kentucky Exclusive
686.3 Transportation Planning Activities FY2017 135,831 135,831 83,403 5,213 25,262 21,954
Sub-Total - Regional Totals 4,104,224 3,274,412 2,619,529 327,441 327,441 829,812 509,521 31,845 154,328 134,116
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 8
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 2 CPG (PL/FTA ) BY COST OBJECTIVE AND FUNDING SOURCE
Work Total Other Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Indiana Indiana Indiana
Element Work Cost Funding Totals Federal Match Local Totals PL KYTC Match FTA 5303 Local Totals PL Local(from Table 1)
FY 2017 CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
FY 2016 Carryover CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Exclusive PL/FTA Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Discretionary PL 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
Indiana Exclusive CPG Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
JARC/New Freedom/5310 (FTA) 100.0000% 100.0000%
SOURCE OF FUNDS
FY2017 CPG - ODOT 3,459,044 2,742,060 2,193,647 274,206 274,206 716,985 440,243 27,515 133,344 115,881
FY2016 CPG Carryover - ODOT 645,180 532,353 425,882 53,235 53,235 112,827 69,278 4,330 20,984 18,235
Hamilton Co. Emergency Mgmt Agency4,104,224 3,274,412 2,619,529 327,441 327,441 829,812 509,521 31,845 154,328 134,116
FY2017 Carrying into FY2018 (220,705) (176,564) (22,071) (22,071) (46,777) (28,721) (1,795) (8,700) (7,559)
FY2017 PL/FTA - KYTC 783,035 480,800 30,050 145,628 126,557
KYTC FY17 PL Funding Summary
601.1 Short Range Planning 18,560 11,396 712 3,452 3,000
602.1 Transportation Improvement Program 22,966 14,101 882 4,271 3,712
605.1 Continuing Planning - Surveillance 342,228 210,135 13,133 63,647 55,313
610.1 Transportation Plan 178,754 109,759 6,859 33,245 28,891
625.2 Services 60,903 37,396 2,337 11,327 9,843
695.1 UPWP Administration 4,520 2,776 172 841 731
697.1 Transportation Program Reporting 3,202 1,966 123 596 517
720.1 Mobile Source Emissions Planning 16,071 9,868 617 2,989 2,597
686.3 Transportation Planning Activities FY2017 135,831 83,403 5,213 25,262 21,954783,035 480,800 30,050 145,628 126,557
686 Kentucky Exclusive
686.2 Boone County Study 200,000 200,000 160,000 40,000
685 Indiana Exclusive
685.1 Dearborn County (INDOT) FY2017 CPG 31,250 31,250 25,000 6,250
1FY16 ODOT CPG carryover funds to be partnered with FY17 KYTC funds
x
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 9
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 2 CPG (PL/FTA ) BY COST OBJECTIVE AND FUNDING SOURCE
Work Total Other Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Indiana Indiana Indiana
Element Work Cost Funding Totals Federal Match Local Totals PL KYTC Match FTA 5303 Local Totals PL Local(from Table 1)
FY 2017 CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
FY 2016 Carryover CPG Activities 100.0000% 82.5123% 80.0000% 10.0000% 10.0000% 17.4877% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Exclusive PL/FTA Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 61.4021% 3.8376% 18.5979% 16.1624%
Kentucky Discretionary PL 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
Indiana Exclusive CPG Activities 100.0000% 100.0000% 80.0000% 20.0000%
JARC/New Freedom/5310 (FTA) 100.0000% 100.0000%
674 Transit
674.1 JARC (5316) FY2012 74,820 74,820 74,820
674.2 New Freedom (5317) FY2012 20,904 20,904 20,904
674.4 2 New Freedom (5317) FY2013 Pass-Thru 57,807 57,807 57,807 57,807
674.1 JARC (5316) FY2010 & FY2011 82,501 82,501 82,501
674.3 Transit Planning Activities (5310) FFY13-14 248,696 248,696 248,696
TOTAL PL/FTA/STATE FUNDED 4,820,202 57,807 3,759,140 3,104,257 327,441 327,441 1,029,812 669,521 31,845 154,328 174,117 31,250 25,000 6,250
Anticipated OH FY17 funding carried to FY18 -
not funded by KYTC until FY18 (267,481) (46,776) (28,721) (1,795) (8,700) (7,560)
KYTC FY17 Funding 983,036 640,800 30,050 145,628 166,557
SOURCE OF FUNDS
FY2017 CPG - ODOT 2,742,060 2,193,648 274,206 274,206FY2016 CPG Carryover - ODOT 532,353 425,884 53,235 53,235FY15 FTA 5310 248,696 248,696FY2012 & FY2013 FTA Carryover 57,807 153,531 153,531FY2010 & FY2011 FTA Carryover 82,501 82,501FY2017 PL - KYTC 601,000 480,800 30,050 90,150FY2017 Discretionary PL 200,000 160,000 40,000FY2017 FTA 5303 - KYTC 182,035 145,628 36,407FY2017 CPG - INDOT 31,250 25,000 6,250Hamilton Co. Emergency Mgmt Agency
57,807 3,759,141 3,104,260 327,441 327,441 983,035 640,800 30,050 145,628 166,557 31,250 25,000 6,2501
FY16 ODOT CPG carryover funds to be partnered with FY17 KYTC funds 2
FTA Pass Through projects matched with recipient match or contributed services
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 10
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 3 - OTHER TRANSPORTATION BY COST OBJECTIVE AND FUNDING SOURCE
Work TotalToll Credits &
Contributed Total Ohio Ohio ODOT CarryoverOK
OD
CM
ST toll Ohio Kentucky Kentucky Carryover
OK
KY
CM
ST Cont Kentucky Indiana Indiana Carryover
OK
IND
ST Indiana
Element Work Cost Services Project Portion State match Yes NoI
OT
AQ
BGP
crs Local Portion State Yes NoI
TC
AQ
BGP
Svs Local Portion State Yes NoI
OT
P Local
P P
FY 2017 STBG Funded Projects 82.5123% 100.00% 20.00% 17.4877% 80.00% 20.00%
FY 2017 Regional Clean Air 82.5123% 100.00% 17.4877% 80.00% x 20.00%
FY 2017 Rideshare Activities 82.5123% 100.00% 17.4877% 80.00% x 20.00%
FY 2016 Research Funded Projects 100.0000% 80.00% 20.00%
Indiana STBGP Exclusive 100.0000% 80.00% 20.00%
610 Transportation Plan (PL/FTA)
610.4 Land Use Planning
610.4 1 FY 2017 STP (ODOT PID #93160) STBGP 354,535 73,134 427,669 292,535 a 292,535 73,134 X X X X 62,000 e 49,600 X X X 12,400
610.5 Fiscal Impact Analysis
610.5 1 FY 2017 STP (ODOT PID #93164) STBGP 105,789 21,822 127,611 87,289 b 87,289 21,822 X X X X 18,500 f 14,800 X X X 3,700
611.5 FY 2017 FIAM Maintenance and Startups local 20,000 20,000 16,502 X X 16,502 3,498 X X 3,498
665 Special Studies
665.4 Regional Clean Air Program (FY17 ODOT PID #93167)
1,2 FY 2017 ODOT CMAQ / KY SNK CMAQ/SNK 343,098 85,775 428,873 283,098 c 283,098 70,775 X X X X 60,000 g 60,000 X X X X 15,000
667 Rideshare Activities
667.1 Rideshare Program (FY17 ODOT PID #93169)
2 FY 2017 ODOT CMAQ / KY SNK CMAQ/STBGP 257,324 11,250 268,574 212,324 d 212,324 X X X 45,000 h 45,000 X X X X 11,250
684 Ohio Exclusive
684.4 Regional Transportation Planning Agency Program (FY16 ODOT PID #99720)
FY2016-17 Mentor Pilot Program Research 42,686 42,686 42,686 i 34,149 8,537 X X
685 Indiana Exclusive
685.2 Dearborn County (INDOT) FY2017 STP STBGP 62,500 62,500 62,500 50,000 X X X 12,500
685.4 Bright 74 Corridor Study FY2016 carryoverSTBGP 81,500 81,500 81,500 65,200 X X X 16,300
TOTALS 1,267,432 191,981 1,459,413 934,434 909,395 174,268 16,502 188,998 169,400 45,848 144,000 115,200 28,800
1 ODOT CMAQ funds provided at 100% with toll credits match.2 KYTC SNK funding matched with contributed services.
x
riginal submitted 02/29/2016 A - 11
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 3 - OTHER TRANSPORTATION BY COST OBJECTIVE AND FUNDING SOURCE
Work TotalToll Credits &
Contributed Total Ohio Ohio ODOT CarryoverOK
OD
CM
ST toll Ohio Kentucky Kentucky Carryover
OK
KY
CM
ST Cont Kentucky Indiana Indiana Carryover
OK
IND
ST Indiana
Element Work Cost Services Project Portion State match Yes NoI
OT
AQ
BGP
crs Local Portion State Yes NoI
TC
AQ
BGP
Svs Local Portion State Yes NoI
OT
P Local
P P
FY 2017 STBG Funded Projects 82.5123% 100.00% 20.00% 17.4877% 80.00% 20.00%
FY 2017 Regional Clean Air 82.5123% 100.00% 17.4877% 80.00% x 20.00%
FY 2017 Rideshare Activities 82.5123% 100.00% 17.4877% 80.00% x 20.00%
FY 2016 Research Funded Projects 100.0000% 80.00% 20.00%
Indiana STBGP Exclusive 100.0000% 80.00% 20.00%
SOURCE OF FUNDS
Total OH Share ODOT OKI Local KY Share KYTC OKI Local INDOT OKI Local
FY 2017 STBGP/SNK FUNDS - Transportation ---------------- -------------------- 522,824 379,824 379,824 94,956 a,b X 80,500 64,400 e,f 16,100 62,500 50,000 12,500
FY 2016 CARRYOVER STP/SNK FUNDS - Transportation ---------------- -------------------- 81,500 81,500 65,200 16,300
FY17 FIAM Maintenance and Startups - Local ---------------- -------------------- 20,000 16,502 16,502 3,498 3,498
FY 2017 CMAQ (OH Clean Air) ---------------- -------------------- 283,098 283,098 283,098 70,775 c X
FY 2017 SNK FUNDS (KY Clean Air) ---------------- -------------------- 60,000 60,000 60,000 g 15,000
FY 2017 CMAQ - (OH Rideshare) ---------------- -------------------- 212,324 212,324 212,324 d
FY 2017 SNK FUNDS (KY Rideshare) ---------------- -------------------- 45,000 45,000 45,000 h 11,250
FY 2016 Research FUNDS (ODOT) ---------------- -------------------- 42,686 42,686 34,149 8,537 i
1,267,432 934,434 909,395 174,268 16,502 188,998 169,400 45,848 144,000 115,200 28,800
a,b FY17 STBGP - LU (PID 93160) $292,535 w/TC + FIAM (PID 93164) $87,289 w/TC e,f FY17 SNK Trans. Planning -- LU ($49,600) and FIAM ($14,800) = $64,400 - KYTC wants SNK tasks rounded to nearest $100.
c FY17 CMAQ Clean Air Program (PID 93167) $283,098 w/TC match g FY17 SNK RCAP ($60,000) w/contributed services match - KYTC wants SNK tasks rounded to nearest $100.
d FY17 CMAQ Rideshare Program (PID 93169) $212,324 h FY17 SNK RideShare ($45,000) w/contributed services match - KYTC wants SNK tasks rounded to nearest $100.
i FY16-17 RTPO matched by ODOT with State funds (PID 99720)
riginal submitted 02/29/2016 A - 12
OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 4 - OTHER PLANNING ACTIVITIES BY COST OBJECTIVE AND FUNDING SOURCE
OH
KY
IN
C/O
FED Ohio
Other State OH Local DOE Contributed HHS USDA Contributed
OKI County Funds
Work Work Activity Total Contributed Total Federal Funds OKI Services Services
Element Work Cost Services Project County
604( B) Program x 100.00%
Ohio General Assembly funds x 100.00%
USDA 50.00%
APA/HHS
MARC/NARC/DOE
Local Water Quality and Regional Planning Programs 100.00%
AGRICULTURAL PLANNING
500 US Forestry Activities
500.1 National Urban and Community Forestry USDA 179,159 52,430 231,589 x 114,565 52,430 64,594
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
710 Water Quality
710 Ohio EPA Program 710.6 FY2017 604 (b) OEPA 59,116 59,116 x x 56,867 2,200710.9 FY2017 Ohio General Assembly Funds OEPA 75,550 75,550 x 75,000 550
710.1 FY2017 Local Funded Water Activities OKI 65,985 65,985 65,985
REGIONAL PLANNING
800 Regional Planning Activities
800.1 FY2017 Local Funded Regional Planning Activities OKI 34,548 34,548 34,548
TOTAL NON-TRANS PLANNING ACTIVITIES 414,358 52,430 466,788 56,867 75,000 2,750 114,565 52,430 165,127
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 13
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 5 - HOURS
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Work Personnel Estimated Estimated OH Trans KY Trans IN Trans FTA USDA OH Water OKI
Element Cost Hourly Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel
(From Tbl 1) Rate Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours
######## ######## 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000%
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
601 Short Range (PL/FTA)
601 Short Range Planning
601.1 FY 2017 CPG 31,030 31 1,003 827 175
601.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 5,910 31 191 158 33
602 TIP (PL/FTA)
602 Transportation Improvement Program
602.1 FY 2017 CPG 39,090 40 968 799 169
602.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 7,260 40 180 148 31
605 Continuing Planning-Surveillance (PL/FTA)
605 Continuing Planning - Surveillance
605.1 FY 2017 CPG 480,664 29 16,480 13,598 2,882
605.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 91,057 29 3,122 2,576 546
610 Transportation Plan (PL/FTA)
610 Transportation Plan
610.1 Transportion Plan
610.1 FY 2017 CPG 300,463 39 7,641 6,305 1,336
610.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 58,051 39 1,476 1,218 258
610.4 Land Use Planning
610.4 FY 2017 STP (ODOT PID #93160) 113,482 23 4,986 4,114 872
610.5 Fiscal Impact Analysis
610.5 FY 2017 STP (ODOT PID #93164) 35,248 27 1,329 1,097 232
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 14
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 5 - HOURS
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Work Personnel Estimated Estimated OH Trans KY Trans IN Trans FTA USDA OH Water OKI
Element Cost Hourly Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel
(From Tbl 1) Rate Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours
######## ######## 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000%
625 Services (PL/FTA)
625 Services
625.2 FY 2017 CPG 104,114 34 3,058 2,523 535
625.2 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 19,241 34 565 466 99
665 Special Studies
665.4 Regional Clean Air Program
(FY17 ODOT PID #93167)
FY 2017 ODOT CMAQ / KY SNK 47,437 3 14,589 12,037 2,551
667 Rideshare Activities
Rideshare Program
(FY17 ODOT PID #93169)
FY 2017 ODOT CMAQ / KY SNK 36,775 31 1,191 982 208
674 Transit
674.1 JARC (5316) FY2012 25,048 45 560 560
674.2 New Freedom (5317) FY2012 6,898 43 161 161
674.1 JARC (5316) FY2010 & FY2011 27,519 45 615 615
674.3 Transit Planning Activities (5310) FFY13-14 42,445 41 1,043 1,043
684 Ohio Exclusive
684.4 Regional Transportation Planning Agency Program
(FY16 ODOT PID #99720)
FY2016-17 Mentor Pilot Program 14,290 74 193 193
685 Indiana Exclusive
685.1 Dearborn County (INDOT) FY2017 CPG 9,909 30 328 328
685.2 Dearborn County (INDOT) FY2017 STP 20,786 40 519 519
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 15
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 5 - HOURS
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Work Personnel Estimated Estimated OH Trans KY Trans IN Trans FTA USDA OH Water OKI
Element Cost Hourly Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel
(From Tbl 1) Rate Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours
######## ######## 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000%
686 Kentucky Exclusive
686.3 Transportation Planning Activities FY2017 44,636 36 1,229 1,229
695 UPWP Administration (PL/FTA)
695 UPWP Administration
695.1 FY 2017 CPG 7,708 47 163 134 28
695.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 1,465 47 31 25 5
697 Trans Program Reporting (PL/FTA)
697 Transportation Program Reporting
697.1 FY 2017 CPG 5,509 37 149 123 26697.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 1,053 37 28 23 5
720 Air Quality (PL/FTA)
720 Mobile Source Emissions Planning
720.1 FY 2017 CPG 27,609 43 636 525 111
720.1 FY 2016 CPG Carryover 5,268 43 121 100 21
674 Mass Transit Exclusive
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA)
Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK)
Middletown Transit Service (MTS)
Clermont Transportation Connection (CTC)
Butler County Regional Transit Authority (BCRTA)
Warren County Transit Service
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SUB TOTAL 1,609,965 1,040 62,557 47,974 11,356 847 2,380
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 16
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 5 - HOURS
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Work Personnel Estimated Estimated OH Trans KY Trans IN Trans FTA USDA OH Water OKI
Element Cost Hourly Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel
(From Tbl 1) Rate Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours
######## ######## 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000% 100.0000%
AGRICULTURAL PLANNING
500 US Forestry Activities
500.1 National Urban and Community Forestry 37,531 21 1,790 1,790
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
710 Water Quality
710 Ohio EPA Program
710.6 FY2017 604 (b) 19,037 22 847 847
710.9 FY2017 Ohio General Assembly Funds 25,108 16 1,615 1,615
710.1 FY2017 Local Funded Water Activities 18,244 29 622 622
REGIONAL PLANNING
800 Regional Planning Activities
800.1 FY2017 Local Funded Regional Planning Activities 11,295 22 507 507
NON-TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SUB TOTAL 111,215 111 5,381 1,790 2,462 1,129
FY 2017 Totals 1,721,180 1,151 67,939 47,974 11,356 847 2,380 1,790 2,462 1,129
original submitted 02/29/2016 A - 17
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSFY 2017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM
TABLE 6 - SUMMARY BUDGET
OKI Fiscal Year 2017 UPWP Funding Distribution
Work UPWP submitted 2-29-16 l OH OH OH OH OH KY KY KY KY IN IN FTA OEPA OEPA OKI OKI cash OH KY ElementElement Summary -Budget FY Hours PL State STP CMAQ Research PL State SNK FTA PL STP Federal USDA Federal State Match Local sub-total Credit Match Total
601.1 PL-Short Range Planning 16 191 12,046$ 1,506$ 1,506$ 15,058$ 15,058$
601.1 PL-Short Range Planning 17 1,003 63,013$ 7,877$ 11,396$ 712$ 3,452$ 10,876$ 97,326$ 97,326$
602.1 PL-TIP 16 180 14,905$ 1,863$ 1,506$ 18,274$ 18,274$
602.1 PL-TIP 17 968 77,974$ 9,747$ 14,101$ 882$ 4,271$ 11,588$ 118,563$ 118,563$
605.1 PL-Continuing Planning Surveillance 16 3,122 227,912$ 28,489$ 28,489$ 284,890$ 284,890$
605.1 PL-Continuing Planning Surveillance 17 16,480 1,158,191$ 144,774$ 210,135$ 13,133$ 63,647$ 200,086$ 1,789,967$ 1,789,967$
610.1 PL-Transportation Plan 16 1,476 116,045$ 14,506$ 14,506$ 145,057$ 145,057$
610.1 PL-Transportation Plan 17 7,641 606,911$ 75,864$ 109,759$ 6,859$ 33,245$ 104,755$ 937,393$ 937,393$
625.2 PL-Services 16 565 39,526$ 4,941$ 4,941$ 49,408$ 49,408$
625.2 PL-Services 17 3,058 206,776$ 25,847$ 37,396$ 2,337$ 11,327$ 35,690$ 319,373$ 319,373$
685.1 PL-Dearborn County (INDOT) 17 328 25,000$ 6,250$ 31,250$ 31,250$
686.3 PL-Transporation Planning Activities 17 1,229 83,403$ 5,213$ 25,262$ 21,954$ 135,831$ 135,831$
695.1 PL-UPWP 16 31 2,938$ 367$ 367$ 3,672$ 3,672$
695.1 PL-UPWP 17 163 15,348$ 1,918$ 2,776$ 172$ 841$ 2,649$ 23,704$ 23,704$
697.1 PL-Transportation Program 16 28 2,079$ 260$ 260$ 2,599$ 2,599$
697.1 PL-Transportation Program 17 149 10,872$ 1,359$ 1,966$ 123$ 596$ 1,876$ 16,792$ 16,792$
720.1 PL-Mobile Source Emissions 16 121 10,430$ 1,304$ 1,304$ 13,037$ 13,037$
720.1 PL-Mobile Source Emissions 17 636 54,563$ 6,821$ 9,868$ 617$ 2,989$ 9,418$ 84,275$ 84,275$
674.1 JARC 10-11 615 82,501$ -$ 82,501$ 82,501$
674.1 JARC 12 560 74,820$ -$ 74,820$ 74,820$
674.2 New Freedom 12 161 20,904$ -$ 20,904$ 20,904$
674.4 New Freedom Pass Thru 13 57,807$ -$ 57,807$ 57,807$
674.3 Transit Planning Activities (5310) 13-14 1,043 248,696$ -$ 248,696$ 248,696$
610.4 LRP-Land Use 17 4,986 292,535$ 49,600$ 12,400$ 354,535$ 73,134$ 427,669$
610.5 Fiscal Impact Analysis Model 17 1,329 87,289$ 14,800$ 3,700$ 105,789$ 21,822$ 127,611$
611.5 FIAM Maintenance and Startups 17 16,502$ 16,502$ 16,502$
685.2 Dearborn County (INDOT) 17 519 50,000$ 12,500$ 62,500$ 62,500$
685.4 Bright 74 Corridor Study 17 0 65,200$ 16,300$ 81,500$ 81,500$
665.4 Regional Clean Air Program 17 14,589 283,098$ 60,000$ -$ 343,098$ 70,775$ 15,000$ 428,873$
667.1 Rideshare Program 17 1,191 212,324$ 45,000$ -$ 257,324$ 11,250$ 268,574$
684.4 RTPO Mentor Pilot Program 16-17 193 8,537$ 34,149$ -$ 42,686$ 42,686$
500.1 National Urban Forestry 17 1,790 114,565$ 52,430$ 64,594$ 231,589$ 231,589$
710.6 OEPA 604b Program 17 847 56,867$ 2,200$ 59,067$ 59,067$
710.9 OH General Asembly Funds 17 1,615 75,000$ 550$ 75,550$ 75,550$
710.1 Local Funded Water Activities 17 622 65,985$ 65,985$ 65,985$
800.1 Local Funded Regional Planning 17 507 34,548$ 34,548$ 34,548$
Total UPWP 17 67,939 2,619,529$ 335,979$ 379,824$ 495,422$ 34,149$ 480,800$ 30,050$ 169,400$ 145,628$ 25,000$ 115,200$ 484,728$ 114,565$ 56,867$ 75,000$ 52,430$ 687,300$ 6,301,870$ 165,731$ 26,250$ 6,493,850$
original 02/29/2016 A - 18
5307 FTA 5309 FTA 5339 FTA CMAQ STP
Northside Transit Center Environmental $ 65,000 $ 65,000 4/30/2015
Northside Transit Center Design/Engineering $ 345,000 $ 345,000 5/30/2016
Northside Transit Center Property Acquisition $ 750,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,000,000 5/1/2016
Walnut Hills environmental $ 10,000 $ 10,000 2/1/2016
Walnut Hills Design and Engineering $ 190,000 $ 190,000 5/30/2016
Walnut Hills P&R Hub $ 960,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,200,000 10/30/2016
Oakley environmental $ 10,000 $ 10,000 2/1/2016
Oakley Design/Engineering 190,000$ $ 190,000 3/1/2016
Oakley P&R Hub $ 960,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,200,000 9/30/2016
5307 FTA 5316 FTA 5317 FTA CMAQ STP
Covington Transit Center Renovation‐ construction $922,813 $230,703 $1,153,516 Jun‐17
Real‐Time Transit Data $129,317 $32,330 $161,647 Jun‐17
NKU Hub‐ planning $12,000 $3,000 $15,000 Jun‐17
Bus on Shoulder ‐ implementation $4,000 $1,000 $5,000 Jun‐17
5307 FTA 5316 FTA 5317 FTA CMAQ STP
Short range Planning Activities 10000 $10,000 Jun‐17
Clermont Transportation Connection (CTC)
5307 FTA 5316 FTA 5317 FTA CMAQ STP
No Planning Activities in FY2017 $0 $0 $0 Jun‐17
5307 FTA 5316 FTA 5317 FTA CMAQ STP
Advocate coordinated approach $4,000 $4,000 Jun‐17
Improve Butler Co. urban center connections $3,000 $3,000 Jun‐17
Technology improvements $6,000 $6,000 Jun‐17
Analyze allocation of resources $1,000 $1,000 Jun‐17
Participation in regional planning $3,000 $3,000 Jun‐17
Update practices and plans $2,000 $2,000 Jun‐17
5307 FTA 5316 FTA 5317 FTA CMAQ STP
No Planning Activities in FY2017 $0 $0 $0 Jun‐17
A‐19
Table 6 ‐ Transit Budget
Federal
Federal
Federal
Federal
Federal
Completion Date
Completion DatePlanning Activity
State Local Total Completion DatePlanning Activity
State Local
Completion Date
Local TotalState Completion Date
State Local Total Completion Date
State
SORTA
Planning Activity
Planning Activity
State Local Total
Local Total
Total
Planning Activity
Planning Activity
Butler County Regional Transit Authority (BCRTA)
Middletown Transit Service (MTS)
Warren County Transit Service
Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK)
Federal
Appendix B
Cost Allocation
Page 1 of 4
ESTIMATED ACTUAL VARIANCE ESTIMATED
FY 2015 FY 2015 (OVER BUDGET) FY 2017
UNDER BUDGET
EMPLOYEE WAGES
Indirect Labor
Acct. # Acct. Name
15(17)-02-001.0-5105.01 Salaries - Indirect Administration $238,649.00 $265,824.27 ($27,175.27) $267,261.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5105.02 Salaries - Indirect Accounting/Finance $187,842.00 $190,273.55 ($2,431.55) $199,910.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5105.03 Salaries - Indirect Clerical $36,879.00 $8,107.70 $28,771.30 $0.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5105.04 Salaries - Indirect Communications $82,055.00 $88,582.88 ($6,527.88) $89,096.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5105.05 Salaries - Indirect Human Resources $68,950.00 $68,168.76 $781.24 $74,124.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5105.06 Salaries - Indirect Administrative Support $13,847.00 $3,430.08 $10,416.92 $3,925.00
Subtotal - Indirect Labor $628,222.00 $624,387.24 $3,834.76 $634,316.00
Direct Labor
Acct. # Acct. Name
15(17)-01-000.1-5105.00 Salaries - General and Administrative $8,435.00 $14,978.87 ($6,543.87) $15,268.00
14-05-665.5-5105.00 Salaries - Solar Ready $13,704.00 $14,967.45 ($1,263.45) $0.00
14-05-665.5-5105.01 Salaries - Solar Ready OKI local $3,044.00 $2,798.70 $245.30 $0.00
15(17)-06-667.1-5105.00 Salaries - RideShare $20,727.00 $14,321.90 $6,405.10 $13,974.00
14(16)-08-601.1-5105.00 Salaries - Short Range Planning co $7,332.00 $8,980.66 ($1,648.66) $5,910.00
14(16)-08-602.1-5105.00 Salaries - Trans Imprvmnt Program co $12,978.00 $8,435.49 $4,542.51 $7,260.00
14(16)-08-605.1-5105.00 Salaries - Surveillance co $160,419.00 $152,255.88 $8,163.12 $91,057.00
14(16)-08-610.1-5105.00 Salaries - Long Range Plng - Sys Mgmt co $81,506.00 $110,586.76 ($29,080.76) $58,051.00
14(16)-08-625.2-5105.00 Salaries - Participation Plan co $28,345.00 $18,313.01 $10,031.99 $19,241.00
14(16)-08-695.1-5105.00 Salaries - UPWP Administration co $2,232.00 $2,984.18 ($752.18) $1,465.00
14(16)-08-697.1-5105.00 Salaries - Trans Program Reporting co $2,644.00 $0.00 $2,644.00 $1,053.00
14(16)-08-720.1-5105.00 Salaries - Mobile Source Emissions co $7,186.00 $14,556.04 ($7,370.04) $5,268.00
15(17)-08-601.1-5105.00 Salaries - Short Range Planning $18,443.00 $20,086.94 ($1,643.94) $28,493.00
15(17)-08-602.1-5105.00 Salaries - Trans Imprvmnt Program $36,642.00 $29,752.32 $6,889.68 $35,950.00
15(17)-08-605.1-5105.00 Salaries - Surveillance $318,088.00 $340,143.63 ($22,055.63) $432,832.00
15(17)-08-610.1-5105.00 Salaries - Long Range Plng - Sys Mgmt $226,346.00 $233,698.61 ($7,352.61) $276,008.00
15-08-610.2-5105.00 Salaries - Long Range Plng - Freight Conference $0.00 $3,677.55 ($3,677.55) $0.00
15(17)-08-625.2-5105.00 Salaries - Participation Plan $80,111.00 $51,300.73 $28,810.27 $95,788.00
15(17)-08-685.1-5105.00 Salaries - INDOT Exclusive CPG $10,033.00 $10,284.74 ($251.74) $9,909.00
15(17)-08-686.3-5105.00 Salaries - KYTC Excl - Trans Planning Activities $38,649.00 $35,564.81 $3,084.19 $27,616.00
15(17)-08-695.1-5105.00 Salaries - UPWP Administration $6,308.00 $3,827.96 $2,480.04 $7,088.00
15(17)-08-697.1-5105.00 Salaries - Trans Program Reporting $7,486.00 $1,821.31 $5,664.69 $5,070.00
15(17)-08-720.1-5105.00 Salaries - Mobile Source Emissions $20,327.00 $15,828.88 $4,498.12 $25,413.00
15(17)-15-610.4-5105.00 Salaries - Land Use Planning $140,993.00 $136,992.50 $4,000.50 $110,584.00
15(17)-15-610.5-5105.00 Salaries - Fiscal Impact Analysis Model Implementation $26,498.00 $10,609.85 $15,888.15 $21,509.00
15(17)-15-685.2-5105.00 Salaries - INDOT Exclusive STP $8,184.00 $8,191.19 ($7.19) $20,786.00
15(17)-20-665.4-5105.00 Salaries - Regional Clean Air Program $24,020.00 $5,674.34 $18,345.66 $8,925.00
10-23-674.1-5105.00 Salaries - FTA (5316) JARC Administration FY08-09 $3,220.00 $14,830.88 ($11,610.88) $0.00
12-23-674.1-5105.00 Salaries - FTA (5316) JARC Administration FY10-11 $5,860.00 $1,542.23 $4,317.77 $24,352.00
12-23-674.2-5105.00 Salaries - FTA (5317) New Freedom Administration FY10-11 $7,612.00 $16,557.88 ($8,945.88) $0.00
13-23-674.2-5105.00 Salaries - FTA (5317) New Freedom Administration FY12 $3,506.00 $2,053.04 $1,452.96 $6,898.00
15-23-674.3-5105.00 Salaries - FTA (5310) Transit $4,716.00 $0.00 $4,716.00 $6,952.00
15(17)-26-800.1-5105.00 Salaries - Regional Planning $29,086.00 $17,094.19 $11,991.81 $11,295.00
15(17)-29-710.1-5105.00 Salaries - Local Water $25,254.00 $24,180.37 $1,073.63 $18,244.00
15(17)-30-710.9-5105.00 Salaries - OH General Assembly WQ $24,789.00 $25,284.83 ($495.83) $25,108.00
15(17)-38-710.6-5105.00 Salaries - OEPA 604b Water $17,716.00 $18,319.79 ($603.79) $19,037.00
15-46-550.2-5105.00 Salaries - APA KY Plan4Health $0.00 $2,494.53 ($2,494.53) $0.00
16-47-500.1-5105.00 Salaries - National Urban and Community Forestry $18,354.00
16-47-500.1-5105.01 Salaries - Nat. Urban & Comm. Forestry - OKI Local $19,177.00
14(16)-71-684.4-5105.00 Salaries - RTPO Mento Pilot Program $8,153.00 $1,501.30 $6,651.70 $5,768.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Subtotal - Direct Labor $1,440,592.00 $1,394,493.34 $46,098.66 $1,479,703.00
TOTAL EMPLOYEE WAGES $2,068,814.00 $2,018,880.58 $49,933.42 $2,114,019.00
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
SCHEDULE OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS, AND GENERAL OVERHEAD
July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015
OKI FY17 Overhead Schedule - provisional DL Method - submitted 2-25-16 B - 1 DATE PRINTED: 2/25/2016
Page 2 of 4
ESTIMATED ACTUAL VARIANCE ESTIMATED
FY 2015 FY 2015 (OVER BUDGET) FY 2017
UNDER BUDGET
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
SCHEDULE OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS, AND GENERAL OVERHEAD
July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015
FRINGE BENEFITS COST CENTER
Paid Leave
Acct. # Acct. Name
15-03-002.0-5108.00 Performance Contingency $0.00 $2,000.00 ($2,000.00)
15(17)-03-002.0-5110.00 Vacation Expense $166,454.00 $179,712.30 ($13,258.30) $162,736.00
15(17)-03-002.0-5115.00 Sick Leave $74,173.00 $62,008.60 $12,164.40 $67,914.00
15(17)-03-002.0-5120.00 Holiday Leave (8 fixed) $72,816.80 $71,226.29 $1,590.51 $73,819.20
15(17)-03-002.0-5120.02 Presidents' Day - Sub Holiday $9,102.10 $9,921.86 ($819.76) $9,227.40
15(17)-03-002.0-5120.03 Columbus Day - Sub Holiday $9,102.10 $8,910.87 $191.23 $9,227.40
15(17)-03-002.0-5130.00 Administrative Leave $12,136.00 $5,809.98 $6,326.02 $9,227.00
Subtotal - Paid Leave $343,784.00 $339,589.90 $4,194.10 $332,151.00
Other Fringe Benefits
Acct. # Acct. Name
15(17)-03-002.0-5205.00 FICA - Employer $175,472.00 $168,015.33 $7,456.67 $178,769.18
15(17)-03-002.0-5209.00 Retirement Plan (403b) $87,799.00 $71,193.66 $16,605.34 $88,964.19
15(17)-03-002.0-5210.00 Retirement Plan (401a) $243,109.00 $232,361.96 $10,747.04 $247,171.68
15(17)-03-002.0-5212.00 Employer 457 Plan Contribution $17,750.00 $17,679.10 $70.90 $18,250.00
15(17)-03-002.0-5215.00 Workers' Compensation $5,409.00 $464.28 $4,944.72 $5,182.50
15(17)-03-002.0-5220.00 Unemployment Insurance $1,200.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00
15(17)-03-002.0-5223.00 HRA Expenses - ER $12,000.00 $5,828.44 $6,171.56 $14,850.00
15(17)-03-002.0-5223.01 HSA Contribution - ER $54,000.00 $52,166.67 $1,833.33 $69,300.00
15(17)-03-002.0-5225.01 Health Insurance Premium $516,856.08 $511,866.96 $4,989.12 $518,054.87
15(17)-03-002.0-5225.02 Dental Insurance Premium $27,566.50 $24,617.48 $2,949.02 $25,619.54
15(17)-03-002.0-5225.03 Life Insurance Premium $9,448.44 $9,515.47 ($67.03) $11,065.81
15(17)-03-002.0-5225.04 LTD Insurance Premium $7,805.40 $9,056.84 ($1,251.44) $10,420.28
15(17)-03-002.0-5226.00 Employee Incentive $4,595.00 $2,267.00 $2,328.00 $1,716.00
15(17)-03-002.0-5240.30 Sick Leave Variance & Adjust $18,491.00 $17,922.14 $568.86 $1,690.88
15(17)-03-002.0-5240.32 Holiday Variance & Adjustment $1,214.00 ($852.83) $2,066.83 $174.58
15(17)-03-002.0-5240.36 Vacation Variance & Adjustment $26,922.00 $9,943.32 $16,978.68 $39,699.84
Prior Year Rate Adjustment $0.00
Subtotal - Other Fringe $1,209,637.42 $1,132,045.82 $77,591.60 $1,232,129.34
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $1,553,421.42 $1,471,635.72 $81,785.70 $1,564,280.34
OKI FY17 Overhead Schedule - provisional DL Method - submitted 2-25-16 B - 2 DATE PRINTED: 2/25/2016
Page 3 of 4
ESTIMATED ACTUAL VARIANCE ESTIMATED
FY 2015 FY 2015 (OVER BUDGET) FY 2017
UNDER BUDGET
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
SCHEDULE OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS, AND GENERAL OVERHEAD
July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015
INDIRECT COST CENTER - NON-LABOR
Acct. # Acct. Name
15(17)-02-001.0-5107.00 Auto Allowance $8,700.00 $8,700.00 $0.00 $8,700.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5510.02 Meals & Incidentals - OR $44.00 $0.00 $44.00 $237.27
15(17)-02-001.0-5515.02 Lodging - OR $172.00 $0.00 $172.00 $1,214.19
15(17)-02-001.0-5520.02 Transportation - OR $347.00 $50.60 $296.40 $1,048.39
15(17)-02-001.0-5520.03 Transp OR OKI Vehicle Mileage $349.00 $454.43 ($105.43) $300.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5520.06 Transportation - IR $345.00 $252.36 $92.64 $236.04
15(17)-02-001.0-5520.07 Transp IR OKI Vehicle Mileage $63.00 $2.17 $60.83 $30.00
15(17)-02-001.0-5525.02 Misc. Travel Expenses - OR $3.00 $0.00 $3.00 $100.00
14(16)-02-001.0-5570.02 PD - Meals & Incidentals - OR $1,586.00 $1,400.70 $185.30 $2,065.72
14(16)-02-001.0-5571.02 PD - Misc. Travel Expenses - OR $652.00 $458.10 $193.90 $405.00
14(16)-02-001.0-5572.02 PD - Lodging - OR $6,899.00 $5,964.13 $934.87 $7,223.09
14(16)-02-001.0-5574.02 PD - Transportation - OR $4,357.00 $4,289.74 $67.26 $4,217.41
14(16)-02-001.0-5574.03 ProfDev OR OKI Vehicle Mileage $0.00 $171.76 ($171.76) $237.60
14(16)-02-001.0-5574.06 PD - Transportation - IR $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
14(16)-02-001.0-5574.07 ProfDev IR OKI Vehicle Mileage $83.00 $0.00 $83.00 $0.00
14(16)-02-001.0-5575.02 Professional Development Registrations $8,711.00 $8,554.94 $156.06 $7,742.40
14(16)-02-001.0-5575.04 Professional Development Memberships $1,040.00 $1,008.15 $31.85 $1,260.00
14(16)-02-001.0-5585.00 Agency Memberships $2,894.00 $2,821.50 $72.50 $3,014.00
14(16)-02-001.0-5590.00 Professional Publicatons $1,093.00 $547.20 $545.80 $530.00
14(16)-02-001.0-6125.00 Professional Services - Other $48,000.00 $44,992.50 $3,007.50 $48,000.00
14(16)-02-001.0-6210.00 Outside Printing & Graphics $1,343.00 $882.30 $460.70 $900.00
14(16)-02-001.0-6350.00 Payroll/Data Processing Services $7,081.00 $7,005.86 $75.14 $7,672.24
14(16)-02-001.0-7110.00 Materials and Supplies $7,231.00 $7,668.71 ($437.71) $7,028.16
14(16)-02-001.0-7110.01 Supplies - Office Equipment $1,151.00 $2,136.57 ($985.57) $1,685.44
14(16)-02-001.0-7110.02 Supplies - Furniture & Fixture $1,300.00 $623.29 $676.71 $769.01
14(16)-02-001.0-7110.03 Supplies - Computers & Software $30,103.00 $15,302.91 $14,800.09 $26,150.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7110.04 Supplies - Computers & Software $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,220.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7151.00 Occupancy & Storage $455,761.00 $461,297.39 ($5,536.39) $456,492.36
14(16)-02-001.0-7153.00 Telephone - Line chgs and LD $7,270.00 $7,090.75 $179.25 $7,350.34
14(16)-02-001.0-7157.00 Internet Expenses $11,773.00 $11,760.00 $13.00 $12,330.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7159.00 Website Management $0.00 $184.95 ($184.95) $475.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7210.00 Postage and Shipping $2,317.00 $1,679.00 $638.00 $1,856.41
14(16)-02-001.0-7250.00 Equip Repairs, Maint & Lease $18,737.00 $17,932.10 $804.90 $21,680.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7310.00 Legal $24,550.00 $17,067.90 $7,482.10 $22,000.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7312.00 Auditing Fees $29,210.00 $23,158.50 $6,051.50 $24,450.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7350.00 Insurance $22,956.00 $23,491.08 ($535.08) $23,802.44
14(16)-02-001.0-7410.00 Meetings and Hearings $470.00 $906.00 ($436.00) $840.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7450.00 Depreciation $19,891.00 $16,018.07 $3,872.93 $24,959.26
14(16)-02-001.0-7510.00 Legal Notices $2,120.00 $749.00 $1,371.00 $450.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7520.00 Retirement Plan Expenses $3,500.00 $2,493.62 $1,006.38 $3,950.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7525.00 Employee Benefit Plan Fees $500.00 $150.00 $350.00 $500.00
14(16)-02-001.0-7651.00 In-house Reproduction $1,144.00 $1,666.02 ($522.02) $1,605.08
14(16)-02-001.0-7653.00 Other Unclassified $2,532.00 $2,890.33 ($358.33) $2,928.02
14(16)-02-001.0-7655.00 Indirect Expense Reimbursement $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Prior Year Rate Adjustment $0.00
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS - NON-LABOR $736,278.00 $701,822.63 $34,455.37 $741,654.85
OKI FY17 Overhead Schedule - provisional DL Method - submitted 2-25-16 B - 3 DATE PRINTED: 2/25/2016
Page 4 of 4
ESTIMATED ACTUAL VARIANCE ESTIMATED
FY 2015 FY 2015 (OVER BUDGET) FY 2017
UNDER BUDGET
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
SCHEDULE OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS, AND GENERAL OVERHEAD
July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015
FRINGE BENEFIT COST RATE CALCULATION
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS A $1,553,421 $1,471,636 $1,564,280
TOTAL EMPLOYEE WAGES B $2,068,814 $2,018,881 $2,114,019
FRINGE BENEFIT COST RATE 75.09% 72.89% A ÷ B 74.00%
FRINGE BENEFIT COST RECOVERY COMPARISON
Should have recovered in fiscal year + $1,016,497 Actual DL * Actual Fringe Rate
Amount actually recovered in fiscal year - $1,047,091 Actual DL * Estimated Fringe Rate
Prior Year Net (Over) / Under Recovery + $0
Prior Year (Over) / Under Recovery Posted to Cost Center - $0
(Over) / Under Recovery of Fringe Benefits = ($30,594)
FRINGE BENEFITS COST DISTRIBUTION
INDIRECT LABOR FRINGE BENEFITS $471,716 $455,139 $469,366
DIRECT LABOR FRINGE BENEFITS $1,081,705 $1,016,497 $1,094,915
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $1,553,421 $1,471,636 $1,564,280
INDIRECT COST RATE CALCULATION
INDIRECT LABOR $628,222 $624,387 $634,316
INDIRECT FRINGE BENEFITS $471,716 $455,139 $469,366
OTHER INDIRECT COSTS $736,278 $701,823 $741,655
TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS A $1,836,216 $1,781,349 $1,845,337
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS B $1,440,592 $1,394,493 $1,479,703
INDIRECT COST RATE 127.46% 127.74% A ÷ B 124.71%
INDIRECT COST RECOVERY COMPARISON
Should have recovered in fiscal year + $1,781,349 Actual DL * Actual Indirect Rate
Amount actually recovered in fiscal year - $1,777,458 Actual DL * Estimated Indirect Rate
Prior Year Net (Over) / Under Recovery + $0
Prior Year (Over) / Under Recovery Posted to Cost Center - $0
(Over) / Under Recovery of Indirect Costs = $3,891
SUMMARY
ESTIMATED ACTUAL ESTIMATED
FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2017
FRINGE BENEFIT COST RATE 75.09% 72.89% 74.00%
INDIRECT COST RATE 127.46% 127.74% 124.71%
TOTAL OVERHEAD COST RATE 202.55% 200.64% 198.71%
FY 2015
FY 2015
OKI FY17 Overhead Schedule - provisional DL Method - submitted 2-25-16 B - 4 DATE PRINTED: 2/25/2016
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
660110 601 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH Short Range Direct Labor 5,910 4,876 3,901 488 488Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 4,373 3,609 2,887 361 361FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 7,371 6,082 4,865 608 608funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 596 492 393 49 49
Rates TOTAL 18,250 15,058 12,047 1,506 1,506
FY17 Funding 95,460 78,766 63,013 7,877 7,877
760110 601 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 Short Range Direct Labor 28,493 23,510 18,808 2,351 2,351funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 21,084 17,397 13,917 1,740 1,740
124.71% INDIRECT 35,534 29,320 23,456 2,932 2,932FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,769 2,285 1,828 228 228Rates TOTAL 87,879 72,511 58,009 7,251 7,251
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 7,581 6,255 5,004 626 626
660210 602 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH TIP Direct Labor 7,260 5,990 4,792 599 599Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,373 4,433 3,546 443 443FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 9,054 7,471 5,977 747 747funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 893 737 589 74 74
Rates TOTAL 22,580 18,631 14,905 1,863 1,863
FY17 Funding 118,125 97,468 77,974 9,747 9,747
760210 602 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 TIP Direct Labor 35,950 29,663 23,731 2,966 2,966funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 26,601 21,949 17,560 2,195 2,195
124.71% INDIRECT 44,833 36,993 29,594 3,699 3,699FY17 OTHER DIRECT 1,360 1,122 898 112 112Rates TOTAL 108,745 89,728 71,782 8,973 8,973
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 9,380 7,740 6,192 774 774
B - 7
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
660510 605 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH Surveillance Direct Labor 91,057 75,133 60,107 7,513 7,513Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 67,380 55,597 44,478 5,560 5,560FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 113,559 93,700 74,960 9,370 9,370funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 73,273 60,459 48,367 6,046 6,046
Rates TOTAL 345,269 284,890 227,912 28,489 28,489
FY17 Funding 1,754,573 1,447,739 1,158,191 144,774 144,774
760510 605 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 Surveillance Direct Labor 432,832 357,140 285,712 35,714 35,714funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 320,276 264,268 211,414 26,427 26,427
124.71% INDIRECT 539,784 445,389 356,311 44,539 44,539FY17 OTHER DIRECT 318,782 263,034 210,427 26,303 26,303Rates TOTAL 1,611,675 1,329,830 1,063,864 132,983 132,983
FY17 Carrying into FY18 8.14% 142,898 117,908 94,327 11,791 11,791
661010 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY15 OH Long Range Direct Labor 58,051 47,899 38,319 4,790 4,790Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 42,957 35,445 28,356 3,544 3,544FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 72,397 59,736 47,789 5,974 5,974funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,395 1,976 1,581 198 198
Rates TOTAL 175,800 145,056 116,045 14,506 14,506
FY17 Funding 919,425 758,639 606,911 75,864 75,864
761010 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 Long Range Direct Labor 276,008 227,741 182,192 22,774 22,774funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 204,234 168,518 134,814 16,852 16,852
124.71% INDIRECT 344,209 284,015 227,212 28,402 28,402FY17 OTHER DIRECT 21,912 18,080 14,464 1,808 1,808Rates TOTAL 846,363 698,354 558,683 69,835 69,835
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.95% 73,062 60,285 48,228 6,029 6,029
B - 8
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
662520 625 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH Participation Plan Direct Labor 19,241 15,876 12,701 1,588 1,588Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 14,238 11,748 9,398 1,175 1,175FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 23,995 19,799 15,839 1,980 1,980funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,406 1,985 1,588 199 199
Rates TOTAL 59,880 49,408 39,527 4,941 4,941
FY17 Funding 313,250 258,470 206,776 25,847 25,847
762520 625 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 Participation Plan Direct Labor 95,788 79,037 63,230 7,904 7,904funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 70,879 58,484 46,787 5,848 5,848
124.71% INDIRECT 119,457 98,567 78,853 9,857 9,857FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,252 1,858 1,487 186 186Rates TOTAL 288,376 237,946 190,357 23,795 23,795
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 24,874 20,524 16,419 2,052 2,052
FY17 Funding 135,831
768630 686 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 0.0000
FY17 KY KY Excl Trans Plan Direct Labor 27,616 0funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 20,435 0
124.71% INDIRECT 34,440 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,499Rates TOTAL 84,990 0
FY17 Unspent Balance 37.43% 50,841 0 0 0 0
669510 695 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH UPWP Admin. Direct Labor 1,465 1,209 967 121 121Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 1,083 894 715 89 89FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 1,827 1,507 1,206 151 151funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 75 62 50 6 6
Rates TOTAL 4,450 3,672 2,937 367 367
B - 9
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
FY17 Funding 23,250 19,184 15,347 1,918 1,918
769510 695 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 UPWP Admin. Direct Labor 7,088 5,848 4,679 585 585funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,245 4,328 3,462 433 433
124.71% INDIRECT 8,839 7,294 5,835 729 729FY17 OTHER DIRECT 225 186 149 19 19Rates TOTAL 21,397 17,655 14,124 1,766 1,766
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.97% 1,853 1,529 1,223 153 153
669710 697 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH Trans Prgrm Reptg Direct Labor 1,053 869 695 87 87Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 779 643 514 64 64FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 1,313 1,084 867 108 108funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 5 4 3 0 0
Rates TOTAL 3,150 2,600 2,080 260 260
FY17 Funding 16,470 13,590 10,872 1,359 1,359
769710 697 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 Trans Prgrm Reptg Direct Labor 5,070 4,183 3,347 418 418funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 3,752 3,096 2,476 310 310
124.71% INDIRECT 6,323 5,217 4,174 522 522FY17 OTHER DIRECT 15 12 10 1 1Rates TOTAL 15,159 12,508 10,007 1,251 1,251
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.96% 1,311 1,081 865 108 108
672010 720 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH Mobile Srce Emissions Direct Labor 5,268 4,347 3,477 435 435Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 3,899 3,217 2,574 322 322FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 6,570 5,421 4,337 542 542funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 63 52 42 5 5
Rates TOTAL 15,800 13,037 10,430 1,304 1,304
B - 10
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
FY17 Funding 82,660 68,205 54,564 6,820 6,820
772010 720 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 Mobile Srce Emissions Direct Labor 25,413 20,969 16,775 2,097 2,097funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 18,804 15,516 12,413 1,552 1,552
124.71% INDIRECT 31,693 26,150 20,920 2,615 2,615FY17 OTHER DIRECT 188 155 124 16 16Rates TOTAL 76,098 62,790 50,232 6,279 6,279
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 6,562 5,414 4,332 541 541
FY10&11 Funds carried into FY17 82,501 82,501 82,501
267410 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 100.0000 100.0000
FY12 JARC Direct Labor 24,352 24,352 24,352Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 18,019 18,019 18,019
124.71% INDIRECT 30,369 30,369 30,369FY17 OTHER DIRECT 300 300 300Rates TOTAL 73,041 73,041 73,041
FY12 Carrying into FY18 11.47% 9,460 9,460 9,460
FY13 Funds carried into FY17 20,904 20,904 20,904
367420 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 100.0000 100.0000
FY13 New Freedom Direct Labor 6,898 6,898 6,898Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,104 5,104 5,104
124.71% INDIRECT 8,602 8,602 8,602FY17 OTHER DIRECT 300 300 300Rates TOTAL 20,904 20,904 20,904
FY13 Carrying into FY18 0.00% (0) (0) (0)
FY15 funds carried into FY17 248,696 248,696 248,696
567430 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 100.0000 100.0000
FY15 FTA 5310 Transit Direct Labor 6,952 6,952 6,952funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,144 5,144 5,144
124.71% INDIRECT 8,670 8,670 8,670FY17 OTHER DIRECT 18,000 18,000 18,000Rates TOTAL 38,766 38,766 38,766
FY17 Carrying into FY18 84.41% 209,930 209,930 209,930
B - 11
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
FY17 Funding 31,250 0
768510 685 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 0.0000
FY17 INDOT PL Direct Labor 9,909funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 7,333
124.71% INDIRECT 12,358FY17 OTHER DIRECT 1,650Rates TOTAL 31,250
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0 0
Carryover Sub-Total % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY16 OH CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 227,507 0 194,402 124,960 15,620 38,202 0 0 0 0 15,620Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 168,349 0 143,852 92,468 11,558 28,268 0 0 0 0 11,558FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 283,728 0 242,442 155,840 19,480 47,641 0 0 0 0 19,480funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 98,306 0 84,367 52,614 6,577 18,600 0 0 0 0 6,577
Rates TOTAL 777,890 0 665,063 425,882 53,235 132,711 0 0 0 0 53,235
FY17 Funding Sub-Total % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 10.0000 10.0000
FY17 CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 944,167 0 748,091 598,473 74,809 0 0 0 0 0 74,809funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 698,642 0 553,554 442,843 55,355 0 0 0 0 0 55,355
124.71% INDIRECT 1,177,471 0 932,944 746,355 93,294 0 0 0 0 0 93,294FY17 OTHER DIRECT 351,652 0 286,733 229,386 28,673 0 0 0 0 0 28,673Rates TOTAL 3,171,932 0 2,521,322 2,017,058 252,132 0 0 0 0 0 252,132
Carrying into FY18 Sub-Total 537,752 0 440,127 176,590 22,074 219,390 0 0 0 0 22,074
Grand Total % OF FUNDING 100 84.3811 80.0000 10.0000 100.0000 10.0000
CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 1,171,674 0 942,493 723,433 90,429 38,202 0 0 0 0 90,42974.00% Fringe Benefits 866,992 0 697,407 535,311 66,914 28,268 0 0 0 0 66,914
124.71% INDIRECT 1,461,199 0 1,175,386 902,196 112,774 47,641 0 0 0 0 112,774FY17 OTHER DIRECT 449,958 0 371,100 282,000 35,250 18,600 0 0 0 0 35,250Rates TOTAL 3,949,822 0 3,186,386 2,442,940 305,367 132,711 0 0 0 0 305,367
B - 12
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
FY17 Funding 62,500
768520 685 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 INDOT STBGP Direct Labor 20,786funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 15,381
124.71% INDIRECT 25,922FY17 OTHER DIRECT 411Rates TOTAL 62,500
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
FY17 Funding 354,535 292,535 292,535 73,134100.0000 Toll Credits
761040 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 20.0000
FY17 Land Use Direct Labor 110,584 91,245 91,245funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 81,827 67,518 67,518
124.71% INDIRECT 137,909 113,792 113,792FY17 OTHER DIRECT 15,553 12,833 12,833Rates Sub-Total 345,873 285,388 0 0 285,388 0
Toll Credits 71,347 71,347 71,347TOTAL 417,221 356,735 285,388 71,347
FY17 Unspent Balance 2.44% 8,662 7,147 7,147 1,787
FY17 Funding 105,789 87,289 87,289 21,822100.0000 Toll Credits
761050 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 20.0000
FY17 Fiscal Impact Anlys Direct Labor 21,509 17,748 17,748funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 15,916 13,132 13,132
124.71% INDIRECT 26,824 22,133 22,133FY17 OTHER DIRECT 500 413 413Rates TOTAL 64,749 53,426 0 0 53,426 0
Toll Credits 13,356 13,356 13,356TOTAL 78,105 66,782 53,426 13,356
FY17 Unspent Balance 38.79% 41,040 33,863 33,863 21,822
B - 13
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
FY17 Funding Sub-Total% OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 20.0000 20.0000
FY17 STBGP/SNK Direct Labor 152,879 108,993 0 0 0 108,993 0 0 0 0funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 113,124 80,650 0 0 0 80,650 0 0 0 0
124.71% INDIRECT 190,655 135,925 0 0 0 135,925 0 0 0 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 16,464 13,246 0 0 0 13,246 0 0 0 0Rates Sub-Total 473,122 338,814 0 0 0 338,814 0 0 0 0
Toll Credits 84,703 84,703 84,703TOTAL 557,825 423,517 84,703
FY17 Unspent Balance 49,702 41,010 0 0 0 41,010 0 0 0 23,609
Grand Total % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 20.0000 TC/20
STP/SNK Direct Labor 152,879 108,993 0 0 0 108,993 0 0 0 074.00% Fringe Benefits 113,124 80,650 0 0 0 80,650 0 0 0 0
124.71% INDIRECT 190,655 135,925 0 0 0 135,925 0 0 0 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 16,464 13,246 0 0 0 13,246 0 0 0 0Rates Sub-Total 473,122 338,814 0 0 0 338,814 0 0 0 0
Toll Credits 84,703 84,703 84,703TOTAL 557,825 423,517 84,703
FY17 Funding 343,098 283,098 283,098 70,775100.0000 Toll Credits
766540 665 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 80.0000 20.0000
FY17 Ozone Direct Labor 8,925 7,364 7,364funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 6,604 5,449 5,449
124.71% INDIRECT 11,130 9,184 9,184FY17 Contributed Svs 9,971 n/aRates OTHER DIRECT 201,399 166,179 166,179
Sub-Total 238,029 188,176 188,176Toll Credits 47,044 47,044 47,044TOTAL 285,073 235,220 188,176 47,044
FY7 Unspent Balance 33.53% 115,040 94,922 94,922 23,730
B - 14
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
FY17 Funding 257,324 212,324 212,324
766710 667 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 82.5123 100.0000
FY17 Rideshare Direct Labor 13,974 11,530 11,530funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 10,340 8,532 8,532
124.71% INDIRECT 17,427 14,379 14,379FY17 Contributed Svs 8,272 n/aRates OTHER DIRECT 147,472 121,683 121,683
TOTAL 197,485 156,124 156,124
FY17 Unspent Balance 26.47% 68,111 56,200 56,200
FY16 Funds carried into FY17 42,686 42,686 42,686
668440 684 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 100.0000 100.0000
FY16 OH OH Excl - RTPO Direct Labor 5,768 5,768 5,768carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 4,268 4,268 4,268
124.71% INDIRECT 7,192 7,192 7,192FY17 OTHER DIRECT 0 0 0Rates TOTAL 17,229 17,229 17,229
FY17 Carrying into FY18 59.64% 25,457 25,457 25,457
FY17 Funding 59,117 59,117 56,867 2,250
771060 710 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 100.0000 100.0000 0.0000
FY17 604b Water Direct Labor 19,037 19,037 19,037 0funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 14,088 14,088 14,088 0
124.71% INDIRECT 23,742 23,742 23,742 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,250 2,250 2,250Rates TOTAL 59,117 59,117 56,867 2,250
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0 0 0 0
B - 15
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
FY17 Funding 75,550 75,550 75,000 550
771090 710 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100 100.0000 100.0000 0.0000
FY17 OH Gen Asmbly Water Direct Labor 25,108 25,108 25,108 074.00% Fringe Benefits 18,579 18,579 18,579 0
124.71% INDIRECT 31,313 31,313 31,313 0FY17 Contributed Svs 0 0 0 0Rates OTHER DIRECT 550 550 550
TOTAL 75,550 75,550 75,000 550
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0 0 0 0
FY16-17 Funding 231,589
650010 500 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16-17 Nat'l Urban Forestry Direct Labor 37,5312 year 74.00% Fringe Benefits 27,773funding 124.71% INDIRECT 46,806
FY17 Contributed Svs 52,430Rates OTHER DIRECT 67,049
TOTAL 231,589
FY16 Carrying into FY18 0.00% 0
771010 710 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Local Water Direct Labor 18,244funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 13,500
124.71% INDIRECT 22,753FY17 OTHER DIRECT 11,488Rates TOTAL 65,985
780010 800 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Regional Planning Direct Labor 11,295funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 8,358
124.71% INDIRECT 14,087FY17 OTHER DIRECT 808Rates TOTAL 34,548
B - 16
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
FEDERAL STATE FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL Toll Crs/OHIO OH/ODOT OHIO OHIO OHIO OHIO LOCAL
TOTAL FHWA/FTA FHWA FHWA FHWA EPA OHIOProject Project COST PROJECT OTHER OHIO CPG FTA STP CMAQ 604b Partner COUNTYCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS
790001 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 General & Admin. Direct Labor 15,268funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 11,298
124.71% INDIRECT 19,041FY17 OTHER DIRECT 82,618Rates TOTAL 128,224
% OF FUNDING 100 100.0000
FY17 GRAND TOTALS Direct Labor 1,479,703 0 1,120,294 723,433 96,197 38,202 108,993 18,894 44,145 0 90,42974.00% Dir Labor Fringe Benefits1,094,923 0 828,972 535,311 71,182 28,268 80,650 13,981 32,667 0 66,914
124.71% INDIRECT 1,845,344 0 1,397,121 902,196 119,967 47,641 135,925 23,563 55,055 0 112,774FY17 Contributed Svs 70,673 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rates OTHER DIRECT 980,056 0 675,007 282,000 35,250 18,600 13,246 287,861 0 0 38,050
TOTAL 5,470,699 0 4,021,395 2,442,940 322,596 132,711 338,814 344,300 131,866 0 308,167
B - 17
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
660110 601 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Short Range Direct Labor 5,910Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 4,373FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 7,371funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 596
Rates TOTAL 18,250
FY17 Funding 95,460
760110 601 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Short Range Direct Labor 28,493funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 21,084
124.71% INDIRECT 35,534FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,769Rates TOTAL 87,879
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 7,581
660210 602 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH TIP Direct Labor 7,260Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,373FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 9,054funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 893
Rates TOTAL 22,580
FY17 Funding 118,125
760210 602 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 TIP Direct Labor 35,950funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 26,601
124.71% INDIRECT 44,833FY17 OTHER DIRECT 1,360Rates TOTAL 108,745
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 9,380
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
1,034 635 40 192 167765 470 29 142 124
1,289 791 49 240 208104 64 4 19 17
3,192 1,960 122 594 516
16,694 10,250 641 3,105 2,698
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
4,983 3,060 191 927 8053,687 2,264 141 686 5966,214 3,816 238 1,156 1,004
484 297 19 90 7815,368 9,436 590 2,858 2,484
1,326 814 51 247 214
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
1,270 780 49 236 205940 577 36 175 152
1,583 972 61 294 256156 96 6 29 25
3,949 2,425 152 734 638
20,657 12,684 793 3,842 3,339
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
6,287 3,860 241 1,169 1,0164,652 2,856 179 865 7527,840 4,814 301 1,458 1,267
238 146 9 44 3819,017 11,677 730 3,537 3,074
1,640 1,007 63 305 265
B - 18
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
660510 605 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Surveillance Direct Labor 91,057Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 67,380FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 113,559funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 73,273
Rates TOTAL 345,269
FY17 Funding 1,754,573
760510 605 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Surveillance Direct Labor 432,832funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 320,276
124.71% INDIRECT 539,784FY17 OTHER DIRECT 318,782Rates TOTAL 1,611,675
FY17 Carrying into FY18 8.14% 142,898
661010 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY15 OH Long Range Direct Labor 58,051Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 42,957FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 72,397funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,395
Rates TOTAL 175,800
FY17 Funding 919,425
761010 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Long Range Direct Labor 276,008funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 204,234
124.71% INDIRECT 344,209FY17 OTHER DIRECT 21,912Rates TOTAL 846,363
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.95% 73,062
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
15,924 9,778 611 2,961 2,57411,783 7,235 452 2,191 1,90419,859 12,194 762 3,693 3,21012,814 7,868 492 2,383 2,07160,380 37,074 2,317 11,229 9,759
306,834 188,403 11,775 57,065 49,592
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
75,692 46,477 2,905 14,077 12,23456,009 34,391 2,149 10,416 9,05294,396 57,961 3,623 17,556 15,25755,748 34,230 2,139 10,368 9,010
281,845 173,059 10,816 52,417 45,553
24,990 15,344 959 4,648 4,039
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
10,152 6,233 390 1,888 1,6417,512 4,613 288 1,397 1,214
12,661 7,774 486 2,355 2,046419 257 16 78 68
30,743 18,877 1,180 5,718 4,969
160,786 98,726 6,170 29,903 25,987
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
48,267 29,637 1,852 8,977 7,80135,716 21,930 1,371 6,642 5,77360,194 36,961 2,310 11,195 9,7293,832 2,353 147 713 619
148,009 90,881 5,680 27,527 23,922
12,777 7,845 490 2,376 2,065
B - 19
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
662520 625 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Participation Plan Direct Labor 19,241Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 14,238FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 23,995funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,406
Rates TOTAL 59,880
FY17 Funding 313,250
762520 625 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Participation Plan Direct Labor 95,788funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 70,879
124.71% INDIRECT 119,457FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,252Rates TOTAL 288,376
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 24,874
FY17 Funding 135,831
768630 686 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 KY KY Excl Trans Plan Direct Labor 27,616funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 20,435
124.71% INDIRECT 34,440FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,499Rates TOTAL 84,990
FY17 Unspent Balance 37.43% 50,841
669510 695 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH UPWP Admin. Direct Labor 1,465Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 1,083FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 1,827funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 75
Rates TOTAL 4,450
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
3,365 2,066 129 626 5442,490 1,529 96 463 4024,196 2,577 161 780 678
421 258 16 78 6810,472 6,430 402 1,948 1,692
54,780 33,636 2,102 10,188 8,854
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
16,751 10,286 643 3,115 2,70712,395 7,611 476 2,305 2,00320,890 12,827 802 3,885 3,376
394 242 15 73 6450,430 30,965 1,935 9,379 8,151
4,350 2,671 167 809 703
135,831 83,403 5,213 25,262 21,954
100.0000 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
27,616 16,957 1,060 5,136 4,46320,435 12,547 784 3,800 3,30334,440 21,147 1,322 6,405 5,5662,499 1,534 96 465 404
84,990 52,185 3,262 15,806 13,736
50,841 31,218 1,951 9,455 8,217
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
256 157 10 48 41189 116 7 35 31319 196 12 59 5213 8 1 2 2
778 478 30 145 126
B - 20
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 23,250
769510 695 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 UPWP Admin. Direct Labor 7,088funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,245
124.71% INDIRECT 8,839FY17 OTHER DIRECT 225Rates TOTAL 21,397
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.97% 1,853
669710 697 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Trans Prgrm Reptg Direct Labor 1,053Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 779FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 1,313funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 5
Rates TOTAL 3,150
FY17 Funding 16,470
769710 697 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Trans Prgrm Reptg Direct Labor 5,070funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 3,752
124.71% INDIRECT 6,323FY17 OTHER DIRECT 15Rates TOTAL 15,159
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.96% 1,311
672010 720 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Mobile Srce Emissions Direct Labor 5,268Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 3,899FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 6,570funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 63
Rates TOTAL 15,800
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
4,066 2,497 156 756 657
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
1,240 761 48 231 200917 563 35 171 148
1,546 949 59 287 25039 24 2 7 6
3,742 2,298 144 696 605
324 199 12 60 52
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
184 113 7 34 30136 84 5 25 22230 141 9 43 37
1 1 0 0 0551 338 21 102 89
2,880 1,769 111 536 466
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
887 544 34 165 143656 403 25 122 106
1,106 679 42 206 1793 2 0 0 0
2,651 1,628 102 493 428
229 141 9 43 37
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
921 566 35 171 149682 419 26 127 110
1,149 706 44 214 18611 7 0 2 2
2,763 1,697 106 514 447
B - 21
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 82,660
772010 720 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Mobile Srce Emissions Direct Labor 25,413funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 18,804
124.71% INDIRECT 31,693FY17 OTHER DIRECT 188Rates TOTAL 76,098
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 6,562
FY10&11 Funds carried into FY17 82,501
267410 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY12 JARC Direct Labor 24,352Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 18,019
124.71% INDIRECT 30,369FY17 OTHER DIRECT 300Rates TOTAL 73,041
FY12 Carrying into FY18 11.47% 9,460
FY13 Funds carried into FY17 20,904
367420 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY13 New Freedom Direct Labor 6,898Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,104
124.71% INDIRECT 8,602FY17 OTHER DIRECT 300Rates TOTAL 20,904
FY13 Carrying into FY18 0.00% (0)
FY15 funds carried into FY17 248,696
567430 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY15 FTA 5310 Transit Direct Labor 6,952funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,144
124.71% INDIRECT 8,670FY17 OTHER DIRECT 18,000Rates TOTAL 38,766
FY17 Carrying into FY18 84.41% 209,930
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
14,455 8,876 555 2,688 2,336
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
4,444 2,729 171 827 7183,288 2,019 126 612 5315,542 3,403 213 1,031 896
33 20 1 6 513,308 8,171 511 2,475 2,151
1,148 705 44 213 185
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
B - 22
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 31,250
768510 685 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 INDOT PL Direct Labor 9,909funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 7,333
124.71% INDIRECT 12,358FY17 OTHER DIRECT 1,650Rates TOTAL 31,250
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
Carryover Sub-Total % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 227,507 0Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 168,349 0FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 283,728 0funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 98,306 0
Rates TOTAL 777,890 0
FY17 Funding Sub-Total % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 944,167 0funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 698,642 0
124.71% INDIRECT 1,177,471 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 351,652 0Rates TOTAL 3,171,932 0
Carrying into FY18 Sub-Total 537,752 0
Grand Total % OF FUNDING 100
CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 1,171,674 074.00% Fringe Benefits 866,992 0
124.71% INDIRECT 1,461,199 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 449,958 0Rates TOTAL 3,949,822 0
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
0.0000
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
33,105 20,327 1,270 6,157 0 0 0 0 5,35124,497 15,042 940 4,556 0 0 0 0 3,95941,286 25,351 1,584 7,678 0 0 0 0 6,67313,939 8,559 535 2,592 0 0 0 0 2,253
112,827 69,278 4,330 20,983 0 0 0 0 18,236
17.4877 61.4021 3.8376 18.5979 16.1624
186,167 114,310 7,144 34,623 0 0 0 0 30,089137,755 84,585 5,286 25,620 0 0 0 0 22,265232,169 142,556 8,910 43,178 0 0 0 0 37,52463,269 38,849 2,428 11,767 0 0 0 0 10,226
619,360 380,300 23,769 115,188 0 0 0 0 100,103
97,625 59,944 3,746 18,156 0 0 0 0 15,778
15.6189 61.4077 3.8380 18.5923 16.1620
219,272 134,638 8,415 40,780 0 0 0 0 35,440162,252 99,626 6,227 30,176 0 0 0 0 26,224273,455 167,907 10,494 50,857 0 0 0 0 44,19777,208 47,407 2,963 14,359 0 0 0 0 12,479
732,187 449,578 28,098 136,171 0 0 0 0 118,339
B - 23
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 62,500
768520 685 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 INDOT STBGP Direct Labor 20,786funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 15,381
124.71% INDIRECT 25,922FY17 OTHER DIRECT 411Rates TOTAL 62,500
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
FY17 Funding 354,535
761040 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Land Use Direct Labor 110,584funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 81,827
124.71% INDIRECT 137,909FY17 OTHER DIRECT 15,553Rates Sub-Total 345,873
Toll Credits 71,347TOTAL 417,221
FY17 Unspent Balance 2.44% 8,662
FY17 Funding 105,789
761050 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Fiscal Impact Anlys Direct Labor 21,509funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 15,916
124.71% INDIRECT 26,824FY17 OTHER DIRECT 500Rates TOTAL 64,749
Toll Credits 13,356TOTAL 78,105
FY17 Unspent Balance 38.79% 41,040
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
0.0000
62,000 49,600 12,400
17.4877 80.0000 20.0000
19,339 15,471 3,86814,310 11,448 2,86224,117 19,294 4,8232,720 2,176 544
60,485 48,388 12,097
1,515 1,212 303
18,500 14,800 3,700
17.4877 80.0000 20.0000
3,761 3,009 7522,783 2,227 5574,691 3,753 938
87 70 1711,323 9,058 2,265
7,177 5,742 1,435
B - 24
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding Sub-Total% OF FUNDING 100
FY17 STBGP/SNK Direct Labor 152,879funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 113,124
124.71% INDIRECT 190,655FY17 OTHER DIRECT 16,464Rates Sub-Total 473,122
Toll Credits 84,703TOTAL 557,825
FY17 Unspent Balance 49,702
Grand Total % OF FUNDING 100
STP/SNK Direct Labor 152,87974.00% Fringe Benefits 113,124
124.71% INDIRECT 190,655FY17 OTHER DIRECT 16,464Rates Sub-Total 473,122
Toll Credits 84,703TOTAL 557,825
FY17 Funding 343,098
766540 665 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Ozone Direct Labor 8,925funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 6,604
124.71% INDIRECT 11,130FY17 Contributed Svs 9,971Rates OTHER DIRECT 201,399
Sub-Total 238,029Toll Credits 47,044TOTAL 285,073
FY7 Unspent Balance 33.53% 115,040
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
17.4877 80.0000 20.0000 20.0000
23,100 0 0 0 18,480 0 0 752 3,86817,093 0 0 0 13,674 0 0 557 2,86228,808 0 0 0 23,046 0 0 938 4,8232,807 0 0 0 2,246 0 0 17 544
71,808 0 0 0 57,447 0 0 2,265 12,097
8,692 0 0 0 6,953 0 0 1,435 303
17.4877 80.0000 20.0000 20.0000
23,100 0 0 0 18,480 0 0 752 3,86817,093 0 0 0 13,674 0 0 557 2,86228,808 0 0 0 23,046 0 0 938 4,8232,807 0 0 0 2,246 0 0 17 544
71,808 0 0 0 57,447 0 0 2,265 12,097
60,000 60,000 15,000
17.4877 80.0000 80.0000 20.0000 0.0000
1,561 1,5611,155 1,1551,946 1,9469,971 9,971
35,220 35,22049,853 39,882 0 9,971 0
20,118 20,118 0 5,029 0
B - 25
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 257,324
766710 667 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Rideshare Direct Labor 13,974funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 10,340
124.71% INDIRECT 17,427FY17 Contributed Svs 8,272Rates OTHER DIRECT 147,472
TOTAL 197,485
FY17 Unspent Balance 26.47% 68,111
FY16 Funds carried into FY17 42,686
668440 684 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH OH Excl - RTPO Direct Labor 5,768carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 4,268
124.71% INDIRECT 7,192FY17 OTHER DIRECT 0Rates TOTAL 17,229
FY17 Carrying into FY18 59.64% 25,457
FY17 Funding 59,117
771060 710 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 604b Water Direct Labor 19,037funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 14,088
124.71% INDIRECT 23,742FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,250Rates TOTAL 59,117
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
45,000 45,000 0 11,250
17.4877 80.0000 20.0000 0.0000
2,444 2,4441,808 1,8083,048 3,0488,272 8,272
25,789 25,78941,361 33,089 0 8,272 0
11,911 11,911 0 2,978 0
0.0000
0.0000
B - 26
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 75,550
771090 710 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 OH Gen Asmbly Water Direct Labor 25,10874.00% Fringe Benefits 18,579
124.71% INDIRECT 31,313FY17 Contributed Svs 0Rates OTHER DIRECT 550
TOTAL 75,550
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
FY16-17 Funding 231,589
650010 500 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16-17 Nat'l Urban Forestry Direct Labor 37,5312 year 74.00% Fringe Benefits 27,773funding 124.71% INDIRECT 46,806
FY17 Contributed Svs 52,430Rates OTHER DIRECT 67,049
TOTAL 231,589
FY16 Carrying into FY18 0.00% 0
771010 710 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Local Water Direct Labor 18,244funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 13,500
124.71% INDIRECT 22,753FY17 OTHER DIRECT 11,488Rates TOTAL 65,985
780010 800 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Regional Planning Direct Labor 11,295funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 8,358
124.71% INDIRECT 14,087FY17 OTHER DIRECT 808Rates TOTAL 34,548
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
0.0000
0.0000
B - 27
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
790001 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 General & Admin. Direct Labor 15,268funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 11,298
124.71% INDIRECT 19,041FY17 OTHER DIRECT 82,618Rates TOTAL 128,224
% OF FUNDING 100
FY17 GRAND TOTALS Direct Labor 1,479,703 074.00% Dir Labor Fringe Benefits1,094,923 0
124.71% INDIRECT 1,845,344 0FY17 Contributed Svs 70,673 0Rates OTHER DIRECT 980,056 0
TOTAL 5,470,699 0
HHS LOCAL LOCAL LOCALKYTC Amer Public KY KY
FEDERAL KYTC FTA FHWA FHWA Health ContributedKENTUCKY KY - PL KY-ST KY-Fed KY-SNK CMAQ KY APA Services Partner COUNTY
SHARE FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS FUNDS Pass Thru Match Match FUNDS
0.0000
246,376 134,638 8,415 40,780 22,485 0 0 0 752 39,307182,308 99,626 6,227 30,176 16,638 0 0 0 557 29,086307,257 167,907 10,494 50,857 28,040 0 0 0 938 49,02018,243 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,243 0 0
141,025 47,407 2,963 14,359 63,255 0 0 0 17 13,023895,209 449,578 28,098 136,171 130,418 0 0 18,243 2,265 130,436
B - 28
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
660110 601 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Short Range Direct Labor 5,910Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 4,373FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 7,371funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 596
Rates TOTAL 18,250
FY17 Funding 95,460
760110 601 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Short Range Direct Labor 28,493funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 21,084
124.71% INDIRECT 35,534FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,769Rates TOTAL 87,879
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 7,581
660210 602 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH TIP Direct Labor 7,260Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,373FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 9,054funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 893
Rates TOTAL 22,580
FY17 Funding 118,125
760210 602 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 TIP Direct Labor 35,950funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 26,601
124.71% INDIRECT 44,833FY17 OTHER DIRECT 1,360Rates TOTAL 108,745
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 9,380
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
B - 29
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
660510 605 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Surveillance Direct Labor 91,057Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 67,380FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 113,559funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 73,273
Rates TOTAL 345,269
FY17 Funding 1,754,573
760510 605 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Surveillance Direct Labor 432,832funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 320,276
124.71% INDIRECT 539,784FY17 OTHER DIRECT 318,782Rates TOTAL 1,611,675
FY17 Carrying into FY18 8.14% 142,898
661010 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY15 OH Long Range Direct Labor 58,051Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 42,957FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 72,397funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,395
Rates TOTAL 175,800
FY17 Funding 919,425
761010 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Long Range Direct Labor 276,008funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 204,234
124.71% INDIRECT 344,209FY17 OTHER DIRECT 21,912Rates TOTAL 846,363
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.95% 73,062
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
B - 30
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
662520 625 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Participation Plan Direct Labor 19,241Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 14,238FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 23,995funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,406
Rates TOTAL 59,880
FY17 Funding 313,250
762520 625 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Participation Plan Direct Labor 95,788funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 70,879
124.71% INDIRECT 119,457FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,252Rates TOTAL 288,376
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 24,874
FY17 Funding 135,831
768630 686 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 KY KY Excl Trans Plan Direct Labor 27,616funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 20,435
124.71% INDIRECT 34,440FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,499Rates TOTAL 84,990
FY17 Unspent Balance 37.43% 50,841
669510 695 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH UPWP Admin. Direct Labor 1,465Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 1,083FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 1,827funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 75
Rates TOTAL 4,450
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
B - 31
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 23,250
769510 695 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 UPWP Admin. Direct Labor 7,088funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,245
124.71% INDIRECT 8,839FY17 OTHER DIRECT 225Rates TOTAL 21,397
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.97% 1,853
669710 697 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Trans Prgrm Reptg Direct Labor 1,053Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 779FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 1,313funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 5
Rates TOTAL 3,150
FY17 Funding 16,470
769710 697 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Trans Prgrm Reptg Direct Labor 5,070funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 3,752
124.71% INDIRECT 6,323FY17 OTHER DIRECT 15Rates TOTAL 15,159
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.96% 1,311
672010 720 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH Mobile Srce Emissions Direct Labor 5,268Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 3,899FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 6,570funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 63
Rates TOTAL 15,800
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
B - 32
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 82,660
772010 720 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Mobile Srce Emissions Direct Labor 25,413funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 18,804
124.71% INDIRECT 31,693FY17 OTHER DIRECT 188Rates TOTAL 76,098
FY17 Carrying into FY18 7.94% 6,562
FY10&11 Funds carried into FY17 82,501
267410 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY12 JARC Direct Labor 24,352Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 18,019
124.71% INDIRECT 30,369FY17 OTHER DIRECT 300Rates TOTAL 73,041
FY12 Carrying into FY18 11.47% 9,460
FY13 Funds carried into FY17 20,904
367420 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY13 New Freedom Direct Labor 6,898Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,104
124.71% INDIRECT 8,602FY17 OTHER DIRECT 300Rates TOTAL 20,904
FY13 Carrying into FY18 0.00% (0)
FY15 funds carried into FY17 248,696
567430 674 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY15 FTA 5310 Transit Direct Labor 6,952funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 5,144
124.71% INDIRECT 8,670FY17 OTHER DIRECT 18,000Rates TOTAL 38,766
FY17 Carrying into FY18 84.41% 209,930
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
B - 33
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 31,250
768510 685 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 INDOT PL Direct Labor 9,909funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 7,333
124.71% INDIRECT 12,358FY17 OTHER DIRECT 1,650Rates TOTAL 31,250
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
Carryover Sub-Total % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 227,507 0Carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 168,349 0FY17 KY 124.71% INDIRECT 283,728 0funds FY17 OTHER DIRECT 98,306 0
Rates TOTAL 777,890 0
FY17 Funding Sub-Total % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 944,167 0funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 698,642 0
124.71% INDIRECT 1,177,471 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 351,652 0Rates TOTAL 3,171,932 0
Carrying into FY18 Sub-Total 537,752 0
Grand Total % OF FUNDING 100
CPG (PL/FTA) Direct Labor 1,171,674 074.00% Fringe Benefits 866,992 0
124.71% INDIRECT 1,461,199 0FY17 OTHER DIRECT 449,958 0Rates TOTAL 3,949,822 0
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
31,250 25,000 6,250
100.0000 80.0000 20.0000 100.0000
9,909 7,927 1,982 07,333 5,866 1,467 0
12,358 9,886 2,472 01,650 1,320 330 0
31,250 25,000 6,250 0
0 0 0
0.0000 0.0000
0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
100.0000 80.0000 20.0000 0.0000
9,909 7,927 0 0 1,982 07,333 5,866 0 0 1,467 0
12,358 9,886 0 0 2,472 01,650 1,320 0 0 330 0
31,250 25,000 0 0 6,250 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
100.0000 80.0000 0.0000
9,909 7,927 0 1,982 07,333 5,866 0 1,467 0
12,358 9,886 0 2,472 01,650 1,320 0 330 0
31,250 25,000 0 6,250 0
20.0000
B - 34
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 62,500
768520 685 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 INDOT STBGP Direct Labor 20,786funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 15,381
124.71% INDIRECT 25,922FY17 OTHER DIRECT 411Rates TOTAL 62,500
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
FY17 Funding 354,535
761040 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Land Use Direct Labor 110,584funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 81,827
124.71% INDIRECT 137,909FY17 OTHER DIRECT 15,553Rates Sub-Total 345,873
Toll Credits 71,347TOTAL 417,221
FY17 Unspent Balance 2.44% 8,662
FY17 Funding 105,789
761050 610 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Fiscal Impact Anlys Direct Labor 21,509funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 15,916
124.71% INDIRECT 26,824FY17 OTHER DIRECT 500Rates TOTAL 64,749
Toll Credits 13,356TOTAL 78,105
FY17 Unspent Balance 38.79% 41,040
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
62,500 50,000 2,500 10,000*est 20%FIAM & 80% Land Use
100.0000 80.0000 20.0000 20.0000 100.0000
20,786 16,629 831 3,326 015,381 12,305 615 2,461 025,922 20,738 1,037 4,148 0
411 329 16 66 062,500 50,000 2,500 10,000 0
0 0 0 0
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
B - 35
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding Sub-Total% OF FUNDING 100
FY17 STBGP/SNK Direct Labor 152,879funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 113,124
124.71% INDIRECT 190,655FY17 OTHER DIRECT 16,464Rates Sub-Total 473,122
Toll Credits 84,703TOTAL 557,825
FY17 Unspent Balance 49,702
Grand Total % OF FUNDING 100
STP/SNK Direct Labor 152,87974.00% Fringe Benefits 113,124
124.71% INDIRECT 190,655FY17 OTHER DIRECT 16,464Rates Sub-Total 473,122
Toll Credits 84,703TOTAL 557,825
FY17 Funding 343,098
766540 665 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Ozone Direct Labor 8,925funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 6,604
124.71% INDIRECT 11,130FY17 Contributed Svs 9,971Rates OTHER DIRECT 201,399
Sub-Total 238,029Toll Credits 47,044TOTAL 285,073
FY7 Unspent Balance 33.53% 115,040
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
100.0000 80.0000 20.0000 20.0000 0.0000
20,786 0 16,629 831 3,326 015,381 0 12,305 615 2,461 025,922 0 20,738 1,037 4,148 0
411 0 329 16 66 062,500 0 50,000 2,500 10,000 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
100.0000 80.0000 20.0000 20.0000 0.0000
20,786 0 16,629 831 3,326 015,381 0 12,305 615 2,461 025,922 0 20,738 1,037 4,148 0
411 0 329 16 66 062,500 0 50,000 2,500 10,000 0
0.0000 0.0000
B - 36
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 257,324
766710 667 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Rideshare Direct Labor 13,974funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 10,340
124.71% INDIRECT 17,427FY17 Contributed Svs 8,272Rates OTHER DIRECT 147,472
TOTAL 197,485
FY17 Unspent Balance 26.47% 68,111
FY16 Funds carried into FY17 42,686
668440 684 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16 OH OH Excl - RTPO Direct Labor 5,768carryover 74.00% Fringe Benefits 4,268
124.71% INDIRECT 7,192FY17 OTHER DIRECT 0Rates TOTAL 17,229
FY17 Carrying into FY18 59.64% 25,457
FY17 Funding 59,117
771060 710 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 604b Water Direct Labor 19,037funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 14,088
124.71% INDIRECT 23,742FY17 OTHER DIRECT 2,250Rates TOTAL 59,117
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
B - 37
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
FY17 Funding 75,550
771090 710 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 OH Gen Asmbly Water Direct Labor 25,10874.00% Fringe Benefits 18,579
124.71% INDIRECT 31,313FY17 Contributed Svs 0Rates OTHER DIRECT 550
TOTAL 75,550
FY17 Unspent Balance 0.00% 0
FY16-17 Funding 231,589
650010 500 (FED) % OF FUNDING 100
FY16-17 Nat'l Urban Forestry Direct Labor 37,5312 year 74.00% Fringe Benefits 27,773funding 124.71% INDIRECT 46,806
FY17 Contributed Svs 52,430Rates OTHER DIRECT 67,049
TOTAL 231,589
FY16 Carrying into FY18 0.00% 0
771010 710 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Local Water Direct Labor 18,244funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 13,500
124.71% INDIRECT 22,753FY17 OTHER DIRECT 11,488Rates TOTAL 65,985
780010 800 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 Regional Planning Direct Labor 11,295funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 8,358
124.71% INDIRECT 14,087FY17 OTHER DIRECT 808Rates TOTAL 34,548
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
0.0000 0.0000
231,589 114,565 52,430 64,594
0.0000 0.0000
37,531 18,354 19,17727,773 13,582 14,19146,806 22,889 23,91752,430 52,43067,049 59,740 7,309
231,589 114,565 52,430 64,594
0 0 0 0
100.0000
18,24413,50022,75311,48865,985
100.0000
11,2958,358
14,087808
34,548
B - 38
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governmen tsFY2017 Unified Planning Work ProgramLabor Base for Fringe and Indirect Cost Allocation Plansby Funding Source and Cost Category
TOTALProject Project COST PROJECT OTHERCode Name CATEGORY COST FUNDS
790001 (LOCAL) % OF FUNDING 100
FY17 General & Admin. Direct Labor 15,268funds 74.00% Fringe Benefits 11,298
124.71% INDIRECT 19,041FY17 OTHER DIRECT 82,618Rates TOTAL 128,224
% OF FUNDING 100
FY17 GRAND TOTALS Direct Labor 1,479,703 074.00% Dir Labor Fringe Benefits1,094,923 0
124.71% INDIRECT 1,845,344 0FY17 Contributed Svs 70,673 0Rates OTHER DIRECT 980,056 0
TOTAL 5,470,699 0
FEDERAL FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL Energy Local LOCALINDOT INDOT INDOT Agricultural DOE Partners OKI
FHWA/FTA FHWA US Forestry MARC ContributedINDIANA CPG STP Partner COUNTY SPECIAL USDA Pass Thru Services COUNTYSHARE FUNDS FUNDS Match FUNDS PROJECTS Funds Funds Match FUNDS
100.0000
15,26811,29819,04182,618
128,224
0.0000 0.0000
30,695 7,927 16,629 831 5,308 37,531 18,354 (0) 0 63,98422,713 5,866 12,305 615 3,927 27,773 13,582 0 0 47,34738,280 9,886 20,738 1,037 6,619 46,806 22,889 0 0 79,797
0 0 0 0 0 52,430 0 0 52,430 02,061 1,320 329 16 396 67,049 59,740 0 0 102,223
93,750 25,000 50,000 2,500 16,250 231,589 114,565 (0) 52,430 293,351748,204
B - 39
Appendix C
Title VI
Office of Equal Opportunity
Title VI Baseline Assessment Tool
1. Who is the Title VI contact person for your agency? Does this person accept complaints from the public? If not, who does? Please include title, email, and telephone number for each person listed. The individual listed below is the Title VI contact person who accepts complaints from the public on behalf of the OKI Regional Council of Governments: Florence Parker Title VI Coordinator 513-619-7686; [email protected]
2. In the past three years, has your agency been named in a discrimination complaint
or lawsuit? If so, when and what was the nature of the complaint or lawsuit? What was the outcome? Was corrective action taken? Explain. For example:
Year Type of Complaint
Finding Brief Description of Allegation
2012 Sexual Harassment
NPC
In the past three years the OKI Regional Council of Governments has not been named
in a discrimination complaint or lawsuit. 3. Does your agency have a written complaint process? If so, please provide a copy as
an attachment.
OKI does have a written complaint process and a copy is attached to this Assessment Tool.
4. Has your agency made the public aware of the right to file a complaint? If so, by
what mechanism?
OKI has a Title VI Notification to the Public posted on its website and in the Lobby of the OKI office. This notification provides information on how to file a complaint against OKI if an individual believes that he or she has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI.
C-2
5. Has your agency provided free translation services for persons with Limited English
Proficiency (LEP)? Do you have a LEP Plan? If so, please provide a copy as an attachment.
a. What techniques or procedures are employed to address LEP?
The Hispanic population is the largest of the LEP population groups in the OKI region. Thus far OKI has not received a request for translation services from any of its LEP population groups but staff is prepared to provide such assistance free of cost through its working relationship with Affordable Language Services. This firm offers professional translation and interpretation services in more than 200 languages along with sign language interpreters. The techniques and procedures employed by OKI staff to work with all LEP population groups in the OKI region are outlined in the Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Guidance attached to this Assessment Tool.
6. Has your agency provided written Title VI Assurances to ODOT? Is the Title VI
Assurance included in the annual MPO self-certification resolution? If so, please provide a copy as an attachment.
OKI has provided written Title VI Assurances to ODOT. The Assurances are included in the annual MPO self-certification resolution and a copy of the Assurance is attached to this Assessment Tool.
7. Do you have any questions regarding this assessment of Title VI? If so, please include them here along with your email address or telephone number and an ODOT representative will respond.
OKI staff does not have any questions regarding this assessment of Title VI at this time. However, staff would like to note that it would be helpful to know about upcoming Title VI or Civil Rights trainings, workshops, etc. where costs might be incurred by the end of each calendar year. That information would enable staff to better assist the OKI Finance Department as it prepares budgets and projects future expenditures for such trainings, workshops, etc.
8. Provide the number of full-time employees of your agency. Provide a copy of your most recent EEO report.
At this time OKI has (31) full-time employees. Since this number is fewer than (50) employees OKI is not required to file an EEO report. However, OKI does employ and adhere to the following EEO and Affirmative Action Policy:
Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action Policy
C-3
OKI is committed to a policy of equal employment opportunity. This is accomplished by enforcing EEO-related federal/state laws and regulations, Gubernatorial Executive Orders and state employment policies and procedures related to civil rights, affirmative action and non-discrimination. OKI will not discriminate against employees or applicants for employment based on any protected status including, but not limited to race, age, color, ancestry, religion, marital status, veteran status, sex, pregnancy, national origin, genetic information or physical or mental disability. All managers and employees must comply with this EEO policy. This policy is disseminated to all employees, various recruitment sources and is displayed at all business locations. Any employee that violates this policy will be subject to discipline, up to and including termination. Any issue related to equal employment opportunity may be discussed with the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Officer, who is designated by the Executive Director. The name of the current EEO Officer is posted on the Cafeteria bulletin board. Anyone who believes he/she has experienced or witnessed a violation of this policy must immediately report it to the EEO Officer.
9. When was the last time the individual responsible for complying with Title VI responsibilities for your agency attended Title VI training? Did he/she receive a certificate of completion? If yes, please attach a copy of the certificate.
April 14-16, 2015, OKI’s Title VI Coordinator participated in a 3-day Basic Civil Rights Training hosted by KYTC (Kentucky Transportation Cabinet) and presented by the Federal Highway Administration Resource Center. The training reviewed the purpose and authorities for the Title VI Program; described the background, purpose and authorities for FHWA’s Equal Opportunity Contract Compliance Program, and described the background, purpose and authorities for the DBE Program. The training did not include a certificate of completion. November 17, 2015, OKI’s Title VI Coordinator participated in the INDOT Title VI Useful Function Training which was a refresher course on Title VI, General ADA and LEP (Limited English Proficiency) requirements for MPOs (Metropolitan Planning Organizations) and LPAs (Local Public Agencies). The refresher course did not include a certificate of completion. December 15, 2015, OKI’s Title VI Coordinator participated in an FHWA Environmental Justice Workshop that was hosted by MORPC (Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission) and presented by the Federal Highway Administration. This workshop did not include a certificate of completion.
10. Would your agency like Title VI training or other Civil Rights technical assistance from ODOT? If yes, please explain.
C-4
OKI’s Title VI Coordinator is always eager to receive Title VI training or other Civil Rights technical assistance from ODOT. An area of particular interest centers around the challenges of implementing the OKI DBE Program, calculating and fulfilling the OKI DBE Goal.
11. Provide the name, title, and contact information of the person who completed this baseline assessment. Is this the person who should be contacted with follow-up questions? If not, please provide the contact information for that individual.
The individual who completed this baseline assessment is also the person who should be contacted with follow-up questions:
Florence Parker, Title VI Coordinator 513-619-7686; [email protected]
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
12. Does your agency include the required DBE assurance language (49 CFR 26.13 (a) and (b)) verbatim in all financial agreements, contracts, and sub-contracts? Please provide a sample copy of such. A sample copy of the required DBE assurance language and verbatim in all financial agreements, contracts, and sub-contracts is attached to this Assessment Tool.
13. Does your agency physically include the Civil Rights Special Provisions (FHWA-1273)
in all contracts and ensure they are included in all sub-contracts, including third-tier contracts. Please provide a sample copy of such. This question is not applicable to OKI’s work program because OKI is a transportation planning agency and does not execute construction contracts.
14. The Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) for 49 CFR 26.21 (a)(1) [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-09-06/pdf/2012-21231.pdf] intends to clarify US DOT’s position regarding which entities can set DBE program goals. It is US DOT’s position that only State Transportation Agencies (STAs), such as ODOT, can set DBE program goals and that sub-recipients would need to implement the established goal. Does your agency currently follow this process or does your agency set its own DBE goals? If your agency sets its own DBE goals, you will need to discontinue doing so and adopt ODOT’s DBE goals.
OKI currently sets its own DBE Program Goal which is 2.5% for Fiscal Years 2016-2018. That goal has been calculated based on the contracting opportunities anticipated in technical consultant contracts such as Architecture and Engineering Technical Studies
C-5
(A&E). It’s anticipated that DBEs will participate on these contracts as members of a project team due to the general shortage of certified DBE firms in the OKI region performing such services.
Consultant Contracts
15. Does your agency have written consultant selection procedures consistent with the provisions of 49 CFR 18.36?
The written guidelines of OKI’s Contract Management Narrative include consultant selection procedures consistent with the provisions of 49 CFR 18.36.
16. What considerations are given to minority contractors in the selection of
consultants for transportation planning work? Serious considerations are given to the participation of minority contractors in OKI’s transportation planning process. OKI’s consultant selection process includes points for DBE participation and every RFQ states OKI’s DBE Goal and the fact that DBE participation is encouraged. a. Does your agency monitor annual Title VI contracting goals? Describe your
monitoring process. OKI staff calculates its DBE Goal based on projected contracting opportunities. OKI’s DBE Liaison Officer, who is also OKI’s Title VI Coordinator, is responsible for the implementation and compliance of all aspects of its DBE Program. OKI’s Finance Department monitors the process by tracking expenditures to DBE and non-DBE contracting vendors via invoices submitted for payment.
b. Does the consultant selection process include maintenance of records of
qualified minority consultants?
The maintenance of records of qualified minority consultants is overseen by the Title VI Coordinator who is also the DBE Liaison Officer. A qualified minority consultant wishing to contract with OKI must provide a current copy of his/her DBE Certification to be held on file in the OKI office.
c. What other methods or procedures are utilized to encourage use of qualified
minority consultants?
Whenever OKI solicits an RFP or RFQ the announcement is posted on OKI’s website and a Legal Notice is published in the major area newspaper. OKI’s DBE Liaison Officer emails the announcement to the appropriate vendors listed in OKI’s DBE
C-6
Vendor Directory. If there are no vendors with the appropriate NAICS codes listed in OKI’s DBE Vendor Directory the DBE Liaison Officer will research DBE directories regionally and nationally. The officer also forwards the RFP or RFQ announcement to the local African American and Hispanic Chambers of Commerce for dissemination to their respective memberships. OKI is a member of both chambers.
d. Are Title VI assurances and provisions included in consultant contracts? Provide
an example.
A sample copy of the Title VI assurances and provisions included in consultant contracts can be found in Item #34 of Appendix C, Standard Terms and Conditions attached to this Assessment Tool.
17. Have consultants made good faith efforts to employ qualified minority sub-contractors? If so, to what extent?
To the best of OKI staff knowledge consultants continue to make good faith efforts to employ qualified DBE certified minority sub-contractors. When responding to an RFP or RFQ consultants will routinely state their intention to employ qualified minority sub-contractors or they will tout the inclusion of a minority sub-contractor.
18. What are you agency’s procedures for monitoring consultant compliance with Title
VI contract provisions?
Please refer to Item #20 in Appendix C, Standard Terms and Conditions. In addition to the consultant complying with the regulations stipulated in Item #20 of Appendix C, OKI staff in the Finance Department performs interim desk audits of contract payments to DBE sub-contractors by the primary consultant to ensure that the actual amount paid to DBE contractors equals or exceeds the dollar amount stated in the schedule of DBE participation. Appendix C is referenced in Question #16d and is attached to this Assessment Tool.
Urban Transportation Planning Process
19. Does your agency maintain documentation describing its procedures for incorporation Title VI requirements into the region’s urban transportation planning program? Public participation is the single most important element of OKI’s transportation planning process. OKI’s Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) includes a work element directing the development and maintenance of its Participation Plan. The Plan describes processes in place to successfully engage citizens, communities and
C-7
business interests in OKI’s eight county region. The Participation Plan also describes formats for requesting, obtaining and recording public input or feedback including, but not limited to, question-and-answer sessions, surveys, or comment sheets. More recently the focus has been to take full advantage of the various social media platforms resulting in a major increase in the number of surveys completed online and much more activity around the posting of Tweets or sustained blogging between staff and the general public.
20. What techniques and procedures are employed to provide data relative to minority and disabled populations, age and sex distributions, neighborhoods, income levels, physical environment, travel habits, etc.? OKI’s staff Demographer and its Operations & Air Quality Manager refer to the most current data available from the U.S. Census Bureau, the American Community Survey and the Greater Cincinnati Household Travel Survey to collect data relative to minority and disabled populations, age and sex distributions, neighborhoods, income levels, physical environment, travel habits, etc.
21. Is this data used to develop a socio-demographic profile of the MPO region? If so, provide a copy of the socio-demographic profile of your agency’s region. The abundance of information available in the three aforementioned sources plus the information that is compiled to update OKI’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) every four years enable staff to develop various socio-demographic profiles depending on the desired end product. A chart from the RTP’s Chapter 3 on Demographics has been extracted from OKI’s 2040 Regional Transportation Plan to illustrate how the OKI region is evolving and changing. The next update of the RTP is currently underway and will be presented for Board approval in June 2016.
22. To what extent is the data considered in determining that a proposed transportation
system will be capable of responding favorably to minority group requirements? What techniques are used?
In addition to the serious consideration of available data, OKI staff hosts interactive public meetings and posts on its website the date, time, location and agendas for its Intermodal Coordinating Committee (ICC) and Board Meetings which are open to the public. These activities provide opportunities to not only share the latest findings and recommendations for proposed projects but to receive input and feedback from residents who live, work, own businesses and/or play in OKI’s eight county region. OKI’s Title VI Coordinator works closely with members of OKI’s Environmental Justice Advisory Committee (EJAC) who keep their respective constituents informed. Many of the EJAC members either represent or work on behalf of OKI’s underserved populations and are usually able to provide additional insight because they are familiar with the history and location for a proposed project. OKI’s Regional Planning
C-8
Manager works closely with the Advisory Committee for OKI’s Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan. This Plan identifies the transportation needs of older adults, individuals with disabilities and low income individuals; lays out strategies for meeting these needs; and prioritizes services for these target populations who are generally described as traditionally underserved population groups.
23. Do the MPO Transportation Plan and TIP include assessments of the impacts that planned transportation system investments will have on both minority (including low-income status populations) and non-minority areas? Discuss the assessment methodology and resulting documentation.
The assessment of the impact(s) that planned transportation investments will have on both minority and non-minority areas are among the responsibilities for OKI’s EJAC members. The announcement of a funding round is usually followed by OKI staff presenting a workshop that is open to the public and all interested potential applicants. This workshop highlights the details of the funding opportunity; confirms the application deadline; answers any additional questions and addresses any concerns. Upon receipt of completed applications for a funding round OKI staff will post the applications on its FTP site and OKI’s Title VI Coordinator will provide EJAC members with the user name and password to gain access to the site. EJAC members will review and score the question on all of the applications pertinent to OKI’s traditionally underserved populations. The members then meet with the Title VI Coordinator to review and discuss their scores eventually reaching a consensus. These scores are provided to the OKI Prioritization Subcommittee which ranks all of the applications and makes funding recommendations to the OKI Board. The Board makes the final decision on all project funding which becomes of record in the official OKI Board minutes.
24. Explain your agency’s public involvement process for transportation planning. How
does your agency obtain and consider input from all citizen groups, especially minority, low income, disabled, and transit dependent?
OKI’s public involvement process for its transportation planning is a formally structured Participation Plan comprised of four Elements. The first Element outlines the strategy and structure that OKI staff will use to engage the public in regional planning and agency decisions that may affect their quality of life. The focus of Element 2 highlights the process for defining Target Groups and Areas using census data to identify where traditionally underserved population groups are most concentrated. Element 3 explains the assessment process that OKI staff has developed to ensure equitable distribution of transportation planning investments or benefits thus avoiding a disproportionate burden of adverse impacts. Element 4 outlines how the Participation Plan will be implemented; lists the technical support
C-9
for plan implementation and ensures commitment to an evaluation of the OKI Participation Plan every four years. OKI staff obtains input and feedback by conducting interactive public meetings and providing presentations related to transportation, land use and the environment to a variety of stakeholders. Staff also continually seeks opportunities throughout its eight county region for discussion and dialogue. Independent of these activities other methods for increasing public awareness of transportation issues or participation opportunities include, but are not limited to, postings on OKI’s website, collaboration with like agencies, coordination with the OKI Environmental Justice Advisory Committee, social media, press releases, media briefings, newspaper articles, newsletters and information displays. a. Do you have a formalized public involvement process? When was the last time
it was updated?
Yes. OKI staff has developed a formal public involvement process for transportation planning that continues to evolve, be reviewed and updated as warranted. OKI staff conducts an update at least every four years. The OKI Participation Plan was last updated and approved by the OKI Board January 2014.
25. Are Environmental Justice (EJ) populations, either individually or through their
organizations and community leaders, represented in the citizen participation effort? If so, how many and in what capacity? Environmental Justice population groups are represented in OKI’s citizen participation effort in various capacities. The OKI Board includes six members of color – (1) member represents a municipality with a population over 5,000; another member is the Director of the city of Cincinnati’s Planning Commission; 3rd member is the CEO & General Manager of the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority; 4th member is a resident of northern Kentucky; 5th member is the President & CEO of the Greater Cincinnati & N KY African American Chamber of Commerce, and 6th member represents the Ohio Commission on Hispanic/Latino Affairs. OKI’s Environmental Justice Advisory Committee has (12) members representing a cross section of the OKI region and includes a local resident, a small business owner, a Freestore Foodbank vice president, city/county/township and state government officials, a council on aging representative, a social service representative, a civil rights advocate and a transit service agency representative. The Advisory Committee for OKI’s Coordinated Plan consists of (10) members of which (1) member represents senior citizens in Clermont County; (1) member is the Executive Director of the Butler County Regional Transit Authority (BCRTA); (1) member represents the Northern Kentucky Area Development District (NKADD); (2)
C-10
members represent Everybody Rides METRO, a transit service agency; (1) member represents Wesley Community Services which provides essential services that promote the independence of senior citizens; (1) is a staff member with the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK); (1) member is Director of the Clermont Transportation Connection (CTC); (1) member is an area resident; and (1) member is a small business owner
26. Are there any other affirmative actions taken by your agency to enlist the involvement and support of EJ populations in the transportation planning process? Explain.
At this time there are no affirmative action activities underway by OKI staff to enlist the involvement and support of EJ population groups but OKI’s Title VI Coordinator is a member of the SW Ohio Regional Transportation Workgroup. One of the current goals for this workgroup is to explore the feasibility of establishing a Mobility Management System which will help fill the gap of providing reliable, safe, affordable transportation for individuals, especially persons with disabilities. Individuals participating in this workgroup run the gamut from parents with a family member who is disabled to health professionals to transportation advocates to city and county officials to representatives from the social service and developmentally disabled communities to representatives from transit service agencies to representatives from area councils on aging to the veterans community. OKI’s Title VI Coordinator and members of OKI’s Environmental Justice Advisory Committee have also provided input to the team of partners collaborating with OKI staff as the result of the award of a U.S. Forestry Grant. The focus of the input centered around how best to involve low income, minority and underserved communities in the process of implementing the grant.
C-11
ATTACHMENTS
C-12
OKI
COMPLAINT
PROCEDURE
C-13
OKI Title VI Program
Title VI Complaint Procedure
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments
720 East Pete Rose Way, Suite 420 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
513-621-6300 www.oki.org
C-14
TITLE VI COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana (OKI) Regional Council of Governments
This document is provided by the OKI Regional Council of Governments for a contractor, subcontractor, vendor or member of the general public to seek recourse if the individual is of the opinion that he or she has been unjustly served during the course of interaction with OKI and its transportation planning process. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against on the basis of race, color, or national origin by the OKI Regional Council of Governments (hereinafter referred to as “the Authority”) may file a Title VI complaint by completing and submitting OKI’s Title VI Complaint Form. The Authority investigates complaints received no more than 180 days after the alleged incident. The Authority will process complaints that are complete. Once the complaint is received, the Authority will review it to determine if our office has jurisdiction. The complainant will receive an acknowledgement letter informing him or her whether the complaint will be investigated by our office. The Authority has ten business days to investigate the complaint. If more information is needed to resolve the case, the Authority may contact the complainant via a letter. The complainant has ten business days from the date of the letter to send requested information to the investigator assigned to the case. If the investigator is not contacted by the complainant or does not receive the additional information within ten business days, the Authority can administratively close the case. A case can be administratively closed also if the complainant no longer wishes to pursue his or her case. After the investigator reviews the complaint, he or she will issue one of two letters to the complainant: a closure letter or a letter of finding (LOF). A closure letter summarizes the allegations and states that there was not a Title VI violation and that the case will be closed. An LOF summarizes the allegations and the interviews regarding the alleged incident, and explains whether any disciplinary action, additional training of the staff member, or other action will occur. If the complainant wishes to appeal the decision, he or she has ten business days after the date of the letter or the LOF to do so. A person may also file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration, at FTA Office of Civil Rights, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
C-15
If information is needed in another language, contact 800-750-0750 (Ohio Relay Service).
TITLE VI COMPLAINT FORM Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana (OKI)
Section I:
Name:
Address:
Telephone (Home): Telephone (Work):
Electronic Mail Address:
Accessible Format Requirements?
Large Print Audio Tape
TDD Other
Section II:
Are you filing this complaint on your own behalf?
Yes* No
*If you answered “yes” to this question, go to Section III.
If not, please supply the name and relationship of the person for whom you are complaining:
Please explain why you have filed for a third party:
Please confirm that you have obtained the permission of the aggrieved party if you are filing on behalf of a third party.
Yes No
Section III:
I believe the discrimination I experienced was based on (check all that apply): [ ] Race [ ] Color [ ] National Origin Date of Alleged Discrimination (Month, Day, Year): ________________________ Explain as clearly as possible what happened and why you believe you were discriminated against. Describe all persons who were involved. Include the name and contact information of the person(s) who discriminated against you (if known) as well as names and contact information of any witnesses. If more space is needed, please use the back of this form.
C-16
Regional Council of Governments
Section IV:
Have you previously filed a Title VI complaint with this Agency?
Yes No
Section V: Have you filed this complaint with any other Federal, State, or local agency, or with any Federal or State court?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
If yes, check all that apply:
[ ] Federal Agency ___________________
[ ] Federal Court ____________________ [ ] State Agency _______________
[ ] State Court ______________________ [ ] Local Agency _______________
Please provide information about a contact person at the agency/court where the complaint was filed.
Name: _________________________________________________________________________________ Title: _________________________________________________________________________________ Agency: _________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone:
Section VI Name of agency complaint is against: Contact person: Title: Telephone number:
You may attach any written materials or other information that you think is relevant to your complaint. Signature Date Please submit this form in person at the address below, or mail this form to:
C-17
Florence Parker, Title VI Coordinator OKI Regional Council of Governments 720 East Pete Rose Way, Suite 420, Cincinnati, OH 45202
LIMITED
ENGLISH
PROFICIENCY
GUIDANCE
C-18
OKI Title VI Program
Limited English Proficiency Guidance
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments
720 East Pete Rose Way, Suite 420 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
513-621-6300 www.oki.org
C-19
LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP) GUIDANCE
OHIO-KENTUCKY-INDIANA (OKI) REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
The OKI Regional Council of Governments is a Metropolitan Planning Organization and a Council of Governments that serves an eight-county region in three states. According to the 2012 American Community Survey there are 2,146,560 individuals in the Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Metro Area. In order to ensure that members of a Limited English Proficiency group are afforded the opportunity to participate in OKI’s transportation planning process, every Legal Notice is published in both English and Spanish in La Jornada, the area Spanish journal. Postings are also made on La Jornada Latina, the Spanish journal’s Facebook page, and public service announcements are broadcast in Spanish by the on-air talent on WOXY-FM, the Spanish radio station. Spanish has been selected relative to LEP support because of the 2,146,560 individuals in the OH-KY-IN Metro Area, 16,490 Spanish persons or 0.80% speak English less than “very well”; 8,256 Indo-European persons or 0.40% speak English less than “very well”; 10,687 Asian and Pacific Islander persons or 0.50% speak English less than “very well” and 3,432 persons speak other languages or 0.20% speak English less than “very well”. Table 1.1 illustrates the social characteristics of individuals in the Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Metro Area and Table 1.2 provides demographic information for the same metro area. Should the need arise, OKI staff has established a working relationship with Affordable Language Services which offers professional translation and interpreting services in more than 200 languages.
C-20
DP02: SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS
2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
Table 1.1 – Entire Table is found in Appendix C
Subject Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Metro Area
LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME
Population 5 years and over 2,006,331 2,006,331
English only 1,892,443 94.30%
Language other than English 113,888 5.70%
Speak English less than "very well" 38,865 1.90%
Spanish 44,931 2.20%
Speak English less than "very well" 16,490 0.80%
Other Indo-European languages 32,589 1.60%
Speak English less than "very well" 8,256 0.40%
Asian and Pacific Islander languages 24,809 1.20%
Speak English less than "very well" 10,687 0.50%
Other languages 11,559 0.60%
Speak English less than "very well" 3,432 0.20%
DP05: ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES 2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Table 1.2 – Entire Table is found in Appendix B
Subject Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Metro Area
Estimate Percent
SEX AND AGE
Total population 2,146,560 2,146,560
Male 1,048,533 48.80%
Female 1,098,027 51.20%
RACE
Total population 2,146,560 2,146,560
One race 2,106,090 98.10%
Two or more races 40,470 1.90%
One race 2,106,090 98.10%
White 1,781,225 83.00%
Black or African American 260,247 12.10%
American Indian and Alaska Native 4,612 0.20%
Asian 42,729 2.00%
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
Total population 2,146,560 2,146,560
C-21
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 58,192 2.70%
OKI Title VI Program
Title VI Policy Statement Assurances
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments
720 East Pete Rose Way, Suite 420 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
513-621-6300 www.oki.org
C-22
C-23
C-24
DBE
ASSURANCE
LANGUAGE
C-25
APPENDIX C STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Item 1. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall be defined
as set forth in this section: (a) "DOT" or "the Secretary" means the Comptroller General of the United States, the
United States Department of Transportation or as the context may require, the Secretary of Transportation, or other persons duly authorized to perform the functions to be performed under this Contract including (where applicable) the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC).
(b) "Approved work program" or "work program" means the approved work program, or any revisions to the work program, approved by the Executive Director of the Council and any designated official of DOT.
(c) "Approved activities" means those activities described in the approved work program.
(d) "Program funds" consist of all amounts, including the value of services and contributions other than cash (if specifically stated in proposal and cost analysis), received by the Contractor for the approved activities.
(e) "Council" means the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments and its authorized representatives.
(f) "Costs" include direct labor costs, salary related expenses, general and administrative overhead, other direct costs, contractor/subcontractor costs, and fixed fee or profit of the Contractor.
Item 2. Use of Program Funds. Program funds shall be applied against only those
expenditures incurred specifically for approved activities and in conformity with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and with the budget approved by a duly authorized official of both the Council and DOT. The Contractor shall comply with the cost allocability provisions contained in 48 C.F.R. Part 31.2.
Item 3. Governing Law. This Contract shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the States of Ohio and Commonwealth of Kentucky. This agreement may also be governed by and construed in accordance with federal law wherein such a law is referenced or necessary to the interpretation of the Agreement. In the event of any proceedings regarding this Agreement, the Parties agree that the venue shall be the Ohio Court of Claims, Franklin County or state courts of Kentucky or the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky,
C-26
Louisville Division. All parties expressly consent to personal jurisdiction and venue in such Court for the limited and sole purpose of proceedings relating to this Agreement or any rights or obligations arising thereunder. Service of process may be accomplished by following the procedures prescribed by law.
Item 4. Ability to Meet Obligations. Contractor affirmatively states that there are no actions, suites or proceedings of any kind pending against Contractor or, to the knowledge of the Contractor, threatened against Contractor before or by any court, governmental body or agency or other tribunal or authority which would, if adversely determined, have a materially adverse effect on the authority or ability of Contractor to perform its obligations under this Contract or which question the legality, validity or enforceability hereof or thereof.
Item 5. Data to be Furnished to Contractor. If the services to be performed are dependent upon the Council's furnishing data and information to the Contractor, all information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing, available, and necessary for the carrying out of the work shall be furnished to the Contractor without charge by the Council, and the Council shall cooperate with the Contractor in every way possible in the carrying out of the planning work.
Item 6. Council's Obligation. Subject to the other conditions of this Agreement, the Council will honor requisitions for costs incurred and budgeted (see Appendix A) in amounts deemed by it and by DOT to be proper to ensure the carrying out of the approved work program and payment of eligible costs. In addition to the Council's right to withhold payment of those items which it or DOT does not deem either proper or consistent with the conditions of this Agreement, the Council may elect by notice in writing not to make a payment of grant funds for any of the reasons listed in Section 10 of this document relative to termination or suspension.
Item 7. Establishment and Maintenance of Accounts. The Contractor shall establish for the
approved activities, in conformity with such requirements as may be established by the Council or by DOT to facilitate project administration, separate accounts to be maintained within its existing accounting system or set up independently at the convenience of the Contractor. Such accounts are referred to in these conditions collectively as the "program account". The Contractor shall appropriately record in the program account all program funds as that term is defined in Section 1 of these cash conditions.
Item 8. Documentation of Activity Costs. All costs charged to the program account shall be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, and vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges. This requirement also extends to any certified DBEs or DBE subcontractors. All accounting records shall readily provide a breakdown of activity costs in accordance with the line items shown on the latest approved budget. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separately from other documents and records and shall be maintained for a period of three years after receipt of the final reimbursement to the Council of Contractors funds, by DOT.
C-27
Item 9. Audits and Inspections. The Contractor will, as often as deemed necessary by DOT, the Comptroller General of the United States, the Council, or any of their duly authorized representatives to have full access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions related to this Contract for three years from the receipt of final payment under this Contract. The Contractor shall include in all its Team subcontractor’s contracts, a provision that DOT, the Comptroller General or the Council, or any of their duly authorized representatives, will have full access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of any subcontractor involving transactions related to the Contract for three years from the final payment under this Contract. The term "Contract" as used in this clause excludes purchase orders not exceeding $5,000 for materials or services directly utilized. OKI will also perform interim desk audits of contract payments to DBEs. The audit will review payments to DBE subcontractors to ensure that the actual amount paid to DBE subcontractors equals or exceeds the dollar amount stated in the schedule of DBE participation.
Item 10. Personnel. (a) The Contractor represents that he has, or will secure at his own expense, all personnel
required in performing the services under this contract. Such personnel shall not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the Council
(b) All of the services required hereunder will be performed by the Contractor or under this supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under State and local law to perform such services.
(c) None of the work or services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted to any other contractors without the prior written approval of the Council.
Item 11. Reports and Information. The Contractor shall, at such times and in such manner as the
Council may require, furnish the Council with periodic reports and statements pertaining to the approved activities and work program and other related matters covered hereunder.
(a) Modification. In the event that subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the Council determines that services in addition to those set forth in Appendix A are necessary, the Council may, at its discretion, request those services from the Contractor. Any such request shall be made by the Executive Director of the Council in writing. The Contractor may then, if it chooses, offer in writing to perform the requested services. The Contractor's written offer shall clearly state the additional cost(s) of providing the additional services. If the Council decides to accept the Contractor's written offer, it shall so notify the Contractor by its written acceptance and the terms of this Agreement shall thereby be modified. Any payments made by the Council as the result of a modification to this Agreement in the manner set forth in this paragraph shall not be included in arriving at the aggregate amount to be paid under this Agreement as set forth in paragraph 2 of Appendix B. In addition, any and all such payments shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Appendix B.
Item 12. Termination or Suspension. (a) Termination for Cause: The Council may by written notice mailed not less than five days
prior to the effective date thereof, terminate or suspend this Contract in whole or in part, or, without such notice, withhold payment, in the event that it finds that the Contractor has
C-28
(i) failed to comply in a timely and proper manner with applicable State and Federal law or with any of the provisions of this Contract; (ii) failed to carry out the approved work program; (iii) made unauthorized or improper use of contract funds; (iv) submitted any application, report, or other document which contains a misrepresentation of a material nature or is incorrect or incomplete in any material respect; (v) violated any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Contract; (vi) if for any reason continuation of the approved work program is rendered improbable, unfeasible, impossible, or illegal; (vii) filing of a bankruptcy petition by or against the Contractor; or (viii) actions that endanger the health, safety or welfare of the Council or citizens of the region. The Contractor shall take such action relative to termination or suspension as may be required by the Council in the notice of termination or suspension or later communication. In such case, termination or suspension shall not affect any otherwise valid and allowable obligations made in good faith prior to receipt of notice of termination or suspension.
In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or other material prepared by the Contractor under this Agreement, shall at the option of the Council, become its property, and the Contractor shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials. The Council shall promptly compensate the Contractor for any satisfactory work completed on those documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports, or other materials that the Council decides to retain as its property.
Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the
Council for damages sustained by the Council by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Contractor, and the Council may withhold any payments to the contractor for the purpose of set off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the Council from the Contractor is determined.
(b) Termination for Convenience: The Council or the Contractor may terminate this Agreement
at any time by giving written notice to the other party of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least 30 days before the effective date of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials as described in Paragraph 10(a) above shall, at the option of the Council, become its property. If this Agreement is terminated by the Council or Contractor as provided herein, the Contractor shall be paid for all eligible expenditures properly incurred for services actually performed prior to termination and invoiced as described in 4(a) of this Agreement; provided, that such costs are approved by the Council and DOT. Payment for those goods and services shall not be unreasonably withheld. In addition, the Contractor shall be entitled to a portion of its profit or fixed fee which shall be determined by multiplying the total profit or fixed fee figure appearing in line 11 of the Cost Summary (see Appendix A) by the percentage of total work completed by the Contractor under this Agreement. For purposes of determining the percentage of total work completed under this Agreement, each item within a task shall be considered so that even if the Contractor fails to complete a task, it will be entitled to the portion of its profits attributable to the items within that task that have been completed
C-29
prior to termination. If this Agreement is terminated otherwise than solely for the convenience of the Council, Paragraph 10(a) hereof relative to termination shall apply.
Item 13. Political Activity. No portion of program funds shall be used for any partisan political
activity or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public offices. All employees of the Contractor shall observe the limitations on political activities to which they may be subject under the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., 18 U.S.C. 595).
Item 14. Campaign Finance. If applicable, the Contractor swears under the penalty of perjury, as
provided by Ohio Revised Code section 2921.11 and KRS 523.020, that neither he/she nor the entity which he/she represents has knowingly violated any provisions of the campaign finance laws of the State of Ohio or the Commonwealth, and that the award of a contract to him/her or the entity which he/she represents will not violate any provisions of the campaign finance laws of the State of Ohio or the Commonwealth.
Item 15. Anti-Lobbying Restrictions. The Contractor is required to sign the Restrictions on Lobbying Certification (Appendix D) and if any contractor funds are used for purposes of lobbying, Contractor agrees to disclose to Council such lobbying on Standard Form LL.
Item 16. Interest of Public Officials and Employees. No officer or employee of the Council and no members of its governing body, and no public official of the locality in which the approved work program or its components will be carried out who exercises any functions or responsibilities in the review or approval of the undertaking or carrying out of such program shall (a) participate in any decision relating to any contract negotiated under this Contract which affects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, or (b) have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in such contract or in the work to be performed under such contract. The Contractor agrees that neither it, its employees, or agents will make any payment, take any action or permit any person to make any payment or to take any action which may result in a violation of this Section 13.
Item 17. Interest of Certain Federal Officials. No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United State of America, and no resident commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part hereof or to any benefit arising here from.
Item 18. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Contractor warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Contractor, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage brokerage fee, gifts, or other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Council shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or at its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
Item 19. Equal Employment Opportunity.
C-30
(a) The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotions, or transfers, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoffs or terminations, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, selection for training including apprenticeship, and participation in recreational and educational activities. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause. The Contractor will in all solicitation or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Contractor will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts of the Team for any work covered by this contract so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor provided that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials.
(b) The Contractor shall keep such records and submit such reports concerning the racial and ethnic origin of applicants for employment and employees as DOT may require.
(c) The Contractor agrees to comply with such rules, regulations or guidelines as DOT may issue to implement these requirements.
Item 20. Compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (a) Compliance with Regulations: The Contractor will comply with the Regulations of the KYTC,
where applicable, and the ODOT, where applicable, relative to non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made apart of this Agreement.
(b) Nondiscrimination: The Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it after award and prior to completion of the contract work, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of material and leases of equipment. The Contractor will not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the Contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations.
(c) Solicitations for Subcontracts including procurement of materials and equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the Contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Contractor of the Contractor's obligations under this Agreement and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
(d) Information and Reports: The Contractor will provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or orders and instructions issued pursuant thereto, and will permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by DOT, to be pertinent, to ascertain compliance with such Regulations,
C-31
orders and instructions. Where any information required of a Contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the Contractor shall so certify to DOT as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
(e) Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Contract, DOT shall impose such contract sanctions as it may determine to be appropriate, including but not limited to: (1) withholding of payments to the Contractor under the Agreement until the Contractor
complies and/or (2) cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Agreement in whole or in part.
(f) Incorporation of Provisions: The Contractor will include the provisions of Paragraph (a) through (e) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the regulations, order, or instructions issued pursuant thereto. The Contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the Council may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event a Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Contractor may request the Council to enter into such litigation to protect the interest of the Council.
Item 21. Occupational Health and Safety: The Contractor agrees to comply with all statutes,
rules and regulations governing safe and healthful working conditions, including the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. 650 et.seq., as amended, Ohio Revised Code section 4167.06 and KRS Chapter 33. The Contractor also agrees to notify the Council in writing immediately upon detection of any unsafe and/or unhealthful working conditions at the job site. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold COUNCIL harmless from all penalties, fines or other expenses arising out of the alleged violation of said laws.
Item 22. Bribery: By the Contractor signature on the contract, the Contractor certifies that no
employee of the Contractor, any affiliate or subcontractor, has bribed or attempted to bribe an officer or employee of the Council.
Item 23. Interest of Contractor. The Contractor covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required to be performed under this Contract. The Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Contract no person having any such interest shall be employed.
Item 24. Violation of and Compliance with Ohio and Kentucky Laws. The Contractor shall reveal any final determination of violation by the Contractor or subcontractor with the previous five (5) year period pursuant to Ohio Revised Code sections 5733, 5740, 5747, 4111, 4101, 4141 and 4123 and KRS Chapters 136, 139, 141, 337, 338, 341, and 342 that apply to the Contractor or subcontractor. The Contractor shall be in continuous compliance with the provisions of Ohio Revised Code sections 5733, 5740, 5747, 4111, 4101, 4141 and 4123 and KRS Chapters 136, 139, 141, 337, 338, 341, and 342 the apply to the Contractor or subcontractor for the duration of the contract.
C-32
Item 25. Findings Confidential. Any reports, information, data, etc., given to or prepared or assembled by the Contractor under this Agreement, which the Council requests to be kept as confidential, shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the Contractor without prior written approval of the Council.
Item 26. Publication, Reproduction, and Use of Material. No material produced in whole or in part under this contract shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The Council and DOT shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data, or other materials prepared under this Agreement.
Item 27. Waivers or Revisions. To be valid, a waiver of any condition to this Agreement, or any revision to the approved work program and budget must be in writing from a duly authorized official of DOT and the Council. No failure or delay by the Council in exercising any right, remedy, power or privilege hereunder, nor any single or partial exercise thereof, nor the exercise of any other right, remedy, power or privilege shall operate as a waiver hereof or thereof. No failure or delay by the Council in exercising any right, remedy, power or privilege under or in respect of this Contract shall affect the rights, remedies, powers or privileges of COUNCIL hereunder or shall operate as a waiver thereof.
Item 28. Safeguarding Operations and Funds. The Contractor will safeguard all funds becoming
available to it for approved activities under this Agreement (including funds becoming available to it for deposit, or deposited, in the program account) by insurance or fidelity bonds or by taking such other actions as may be approved by DOT and the Council. Such insurance or fidelity bonds, if required, shall be of such types, in such amounts, and with such coverage and otherwise as shall be satisfactory to DOT and the Council and proper and adequate for the purposes of this Agreement.
Item 29. Adjustments and Amounts of the Agreement. The Council reserves the right to review the progress made by the Contractor in carrying out the approved work program and, on the basis of this review, to renegotiate with the Contractor and decrease (or increase subject to the availability of funds) accordingly the amount of the compensation provided hereunder.
Item 30. Assignment. The Contractor shall not assign, or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Council. Any purported assignment or subcontract by Contractor in violation hereof shall be void. It is expressly acknowledged that the Council shall never be required or obligated to consent to any request for assignment or subcontract; and further that such refusal to consent can be for any or no reason fully within the sole discretion of the Council. However, in the case of an assignment or transfer of a claim for money due or to become due under this Agreement to a bank, trust company or other financial institution, the Contractor need not obtain the consent of the Council if the Contractor promptly furnishes notice of any such assignment or transfer.
Item 31. Disputes. The Contractor agrees that all disputes concerning questions of fact in connection with the work, and not otherwise disposed of by the specific terms of this Agreement shall be resolved as follows:
The Contractor shall notify the Council's Executive Director, in writing, within sixty (60) days following a determination by the Council, which in the opinion of the Contractor, is in material conflict with the facts concerning the subject matter. In such notification, the Contractor shall present such
C-33
evidentiary matters as may support the Contractor's position and shall request a review of the previous determination. Within a reasonable time, the Executive Director shall cause the circumstance and facts to be reappraised for the purpose of his determination.
The Contractor agrees that the Executive Director will decide all such questions which may arise including the quality and acceptability of materials furnished and work performed; the rate of progress of the work; the interpretation of the plans and specifications; the acceptable fulfillment of the Agreement on the part of the Contractor; matters concerning compensation and all other matters and disputes relating to facts in connection with this Agreement; and the services or work to be performed there-under. Item 32. Remedies. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this Agreement which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Council Executive Director, who shall reduce his decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the Contractor. The decision of the Council Executive Director shall be final and conclusive unless within 30 days from the date of receipt of such a copy, the Contractor mails or otherwise furnishes to the Executive Director a written appeal addressed to the Council Executive Committee. The decision of the Executive Committee of the Council Board of Trustee’s shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence. In connection with any appeal proceeding under this clause, the Contractor shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of their appeal. Pending final decision of a dispute hereunder, the Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of the Agreement in accordance with the Council Executive Director's decision and such continued performance does not in any manner imply acceptance of an agreement with that decision by the contractor nor does it infringe upon the Contractor's right to appeal that decision.
This "Remedies” clause does not preclude consideration of law questions in connection with decisions provided for in the above paragraph; provided, that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as making final the decision of any administrative official, representative, or board on a question of law.
Item 33. Responsibility for Claims and Liability. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Council and those agencies previously defined as DOT, from and against liabilities, losses, damages, cost, expenses, and disbursements imposed on, asserted against or incurred By the Council, and DOT to the extent that such liabilities resulted from the negligent performance, or negligent acts of its agents or employees.
Item 34. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise. It is the policy of the Council that minority business enterprises, as defined in 49 CFR Part 26, shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this Agreement. Consequently, the D.B.E. requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 apply to this Agreement.
The Council shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any DOT-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE Program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure non-discrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient’s DBE Program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by
C-34
reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to COUNCIL of its failure to carry out its approved programs, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 CFR Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S. C. 1001 and /or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et sq.) The Contractor agrees to ensure that minority business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 26 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided under this Agreement. The target for such DBE utilization would be 5% of total contract funds. The Contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure that minority business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform contracts. The Contractor agrees to include as part of its contracts, a clause requiring disclosure of names, addresses and other information pertaining to the DOT-assisted contract. Contractors must include such a clause in sub-contracting agreements. The Recipient agrees to comply with the DBE requirements contained within 49 CFR Part 26. The Contractor, subrecipient, or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this Agreement. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Agreement, which may result in the termination of this Agreement or such other remedy as the Recipient deems appropriate. Each contract signed with a Contractor (and each subcontract the prime contractor signs with a subcontractor) must include this provision. The Council will require all DBEs to inform it, in a written affidavit, of any change to its circumstances affecting its ability to meet size, disadvantaged status, ownership or control criteria of 49 CFR Part 26, or of any material changes in the information provided with such DBE’s application for certification.
Item 35. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap. The Contractor agrees to comply with U.S. DOT regulations “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance,” 49 CFR 27.9, which implement the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, prohibiting discrimination against otherwise qualified persons, under this agreement.
Item 36. Authority to do Business. The Contractor must be duly organized and must be
properly authorized to do business under the laws of Ohio and Kentucky. Contractor must be in good standing and have full legal capacity to provide the services specified under this Contract. The Contractor must have all necessary right and lawful authority to enter into this Contract for the full term hereof and that proper corporate or other action has been duly taken authorizing the Contractor to enter into this Contract. The Contractor will provide the Council with a copy of a corporate resolution authorizing this action and a letter from an attorney confirming that the Contractor is authorized to do business in the State of Ohio and Commonwealth of Kentucky if requested. All contracts must be signed by a duly authorized officer, agent or employee of the Contractor.
Item 37. Hold Harmless and Indemnification Clause. The Contractor agrees to indemnify,
hold harmless, and defend the Council, its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and successors in interest from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys’ fees, arising out of or resulting, directly or indirectly, from the Contractor’s (or Contractor’s subcontractors if any) performance or breach of the contract provided that such claim, damage, loss, or expense is (1) attributable to personal injury, bodily injury, sickness, death, or to injury to or destruction of property, including the loss of use resulting therefrom, or from negligent acts, errors or omissions and (2) not caused by the negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of the Council or its elected and appointed officials and employees acting within the scope of their employment. This Hold Harmless and Indemnification Clause shall in no way be limited by any financial responsibility or insurance requirements and shall survive the termination of this Contract.
Item 38. Insurance Requirements. Prior to commencing work, Contractor shall obtain at its own cost and expense the following types of insurance through insurance companies licensed in the State of Ohio and the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Insurance written by non-admitted carriers will also be considered acceptable, in accordance with Ohio Revised Code section 3905 and Kentucky Insurance Law (KRS 304.10-040). Workers' Compensation written through qualified group self-insurance programs in accordance with Ohio Revised Code section 4123 Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS 342.350) will also be acceptable. The Contractor shall not commence work under this Contract until all insurance required under the Contract Document has been obtained and until copies of policies or certificates thereof are submitted to and approved by the COUNCIL Finance Department. The Contractor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work until the insurance required of such subcontractor has been obtained and copies of Certificates of Insurance retained by Contractor evidencing proof of coverages. Without limiting Contractor's indemnification requirements, it is agreed that Contractor shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this agreement the following policy or policies of insurance covering its operations, and require subcontractors, if subcontracting is authorized, to procure and maintain these same policies. COUNCIL may require Contractor to supply proof of subcontractor’s insurance via Certificates of Insurance, or at the Council’s option, actual copies of policies.
C-36
A. The following clause shall be added to the Contractor's (and approved
subcontractors) Comprehensive General Liability Policies: 1. "The Council’s (COUNCIL), its elected and appointed officials, employees,
agents and successors are added as an "Additional Insured" as respects operations of the Named Insured performed relative to the contract.”
B. The insurance to be procured and maintained and the minimum Limits of Liability shall
be as follows, unless different Limits are specified by addendum to the Contract:
1. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY, via the Occurrence Form, with a $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit for any one occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for Bodily Injury, Personal Injury and Property Damage, including:
a. Premises - Operations Coverage b. Completed Operations c. Contractual Liability d. Broad Form Property Damage e. Independent Contractors Protective Liability f. Personal Injury
2. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insuring all Owned, Non-Owned and Hired Motor Vehicles. The minimum coverage Liability Limit is $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit for any one accident. The Limit of Liability may be subject to increase according to any applicable State or Federal Transportation Regulations.
3. Workers' Compensation insuring the employers' obligations under
Kentucky Revised Statutes Chapter 342.Employers' Liability with a $100,000 Limit of Liability for Each Accident/$500,000 Disease - Policy Limit/$100,000 Disease - Each Employee
4. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (Errors and Omission Liability) insurance policy,
which includes a minimum limit of liability of $1,000,000 for each Wrongful Act. In the event that the Contractor’s policy is written on a “Claims Made” form, the Contractor shall, after work has been completed, furnish evidence that the liability coverage has been maintained for at least one year after completion of work, either by submitting renewal policies with a Retroactive Date of not later than the date work commenced under this contract, or by evidence that the Contractor has purchased an Extended Reporting Period Endorsement that will apply to any and all claims arising from work performed under this contract.
C. Acceptability Insurance is to be placed with Insurance Companies with an A. M. Best Rating of no less than "B+ VI", unless proper financial information relating to the Company is submitted to and approved by COUNCIL’s Finance Department.
D. Miscellaneous
C-37
1. The Contractor shall procure and maintain insurance policies as described
herein and for which the COUNCIL Finance Department shall be furnished Certificates of Insurance upon the execution of the Contract. The Certificates shall include provisions stating that the policies may not be cancelled without COUNCIL having been provided at least (30) thirty days written notice. The Certificates shall identify the Contract to which they apply and shall include the name and address of the person executing the Certificate of Insurance as well as the person's signature. If policies expire before the completion of the Contract, renewal Certificates of Insurance shall be furnished to COUNCIL’s Finance Department before the expiration date.
2. Certificates of Insurance as required above shall be furnished, as called for:
a. No later than five (5) days after the successful submitting firm is
notified of award by the Council to:
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments Attn: Finance Department
720 East Pete Rose Way, Suite 420 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
3. The Contractor agrees that it will not materially alter any of the insurance
policies currently in force and relied on under this agreement. Further, the Contractor will not reduce any coverage amount below the limits required in this agreement.
4. Approval of the insurance by COUNCIL shall not in any way relieve or
decrease the liability of the Contractor hereunder. It is expressly understood that the Council does not in any way represent that the specified Limits of Liability or coverage or policy forms are sufficient or adequate to protect the interest or liabilities of the Contractor.
Item 39. Provisions to be Incorporated in Subcontracts . The prime contractor agrees to pay each subcontractor under this prime contract for satisfactory performance of its contract no later than then (10) working days from the receipt of each payment the contractor receives from OKI. The prime contractor agrees further to return retainage payments to each subcontractor within 30 days after the subcontractor’s work is satisfactorily completed. Any delay or postponement of such payment from the above referenced time frame may occur only for good cause following written approval by OKI. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subcontractors. Failure to comply may result in said prime contractor being eliminated from future participation in OKI contract opportunities for a period of one year and until a written plan of remedy to avoid such occurrences in the future is submitted by the offending prime contractor for approval by OKI. The Contractor agrees to incorporate all the provisions of Appendix C, Item 1 through Item 38 and Appendix D in its entirety, in any Sub-Contracts. In addition, if additional
C-38
contracts are authorized by the Council in writing, the Contractor agrees to incorporate all such Appendix C and D provisions in such contracts.
C-39
SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC
PROFILE
C-40
De
mo
gra
ph
ic P
rofi
le
Bo
on
e C
o,
KY
Bu
tle
r C
o.,
OH
Ca
mp
be
ll C
o.,
KY
Cle
rmo
nt
Co
., O
HD
ea
rbo
rn C
o.,
IN
Ha
mil
ton
Co
., O
HK
en
ton
Co
., K
YW
arr
en
Co
., O
HO
KI
Re
gio
n
Tota
l popula
tion
118,8
11
368,1
30
90,3
36
197,3
63
50,0
47
802,3
74
159,7
20
212,6
93
1,9
99,4
74
One R
ace
116,6
52
360,2
63
88,9
44
194,7
10
49,5
57
785,1
88
156,5
55
209,5
09
1,9
61,3
78
W
hite
109,0
50
316,6
67
85,2
15
189,2
50
48,7
80
552,3
30
145,3
94
192,4
31
1,6
39,1
17
B
lack o
r A
fric
an A
merican
2,9
92
26,9
72
2,2
90
2,2
84
300
205,9
52
7,3
59
6,9
40
255,0
89
A
merican India
n a
nd A
laska N
ative
228
770
126
403
87
1,6
17
294
341
3,8
66
A
sia
n2,5
34
8,8
11
753
1,9
20
189
16,1
82
1,4
47
8,2
84
40,1
20
Asia
n India
n632
2,9
66
203
692
25
5,6
12
390
4,1
42
14,6
62
Chin
ese
299
1,8
73
136
386
31
3,6
16
208
1,8
45
8,3
94
Filip
ino
187
715
123
205
50
1,3
85
229
375
3,2
69
Japanese
860
272
46
84
18
841
126
405
2,6
52
Kore
an
161
520
102
107
18
1,3
44
115
445
2,8
12
Vie
tnam
ese
193
1,3
51
33
226
33
1,1
42
107
357
3,4
42
Oth
er
Asia
n [
1]
202
1,1
14
110
220
14
2,2
42
272
715
4,8
89
N
ative
Haw
aiian a
nd O
ther
Pacific
Isla
nder
95
288
20
61
26
603
155
99
1,3
47
Native
Haw
aiian
27
46
322
687
29
23
243
Guam
ania
n o
r C
ham
orr
o24
79
93
5231
42
17
410
Sam
oan
16
10
314
635
14
199
Oth
er
Pacific
Isla
nder
[2]
28
153
522
9250
70
58
595
S
om
e O
ther
Race
1,7
53
6,7
55
540
792
175
8,5
04
1,9
06
1,4
14
21,8
39
Tw
o o
r M
ore
Races
2,1
59
7,8
67
1,3
92
2,6
53
490
17,1
86
3,1
65
3,1
84
38,0
96
W
hite;
Am
erican India
n a
nd A
laska N
ative
[3]
413
1,2
46
315
818
143
1,9
81
519
657
6,0
92
W
hite;
Asia
n [
3]
475
1,2
91
172
520
70
2,5
98
396
1,0
02
6,5
24
W
hite;
Bla
ck o
r A
fric
an A
merican [
3]
699
3,3
72
668
873
177
7,6
40
1,5
48
855
15,8
32
W
hite;
Som
e O
ther
Race [
3]
260
777
69
172
53
969
253
203
2,7
56
R
ace a
lone o
r in
com
bin
ation w
ith o
ne o
r m
ore
oth
er
races:
[4]
White
111,0
47
323,8
20
86,5
20
191,8
19
49,2
47
567,0
32
148,3
49
195,3
73
1,6
73,2
07
Bla
ck o
r A
fric
an A
merican
3,8
60
31,1
21
3,0
50
3,2
97
492
216,7
82
9,1
57
8,0
04
275,7
63
Am
erican India
n a
nd A
laska N
ative
771
2,4
96
512
1,3
43
249
5,8
06
995
1,1
51
13,3
23
Asia
n3,1
48
10,5
55
986
2,5
44
286
20,0
16
1,9
77
9,5
50
49,0
62
Native
Haw
aiian a
nd O
ther
Pacific
Isla
nder
176
503
65
138
44
1,0
75
271
220
2,4
92
Som
e O
ther
Race
2,1
16
7,9
40
666
1,0
31
238
10,4
31
2,3
50
1,7
84
26,5
56
HIS
PA
NIC
OR
LA
TIN
O
Tota
l popula
tion
118,8
11
368,1
30
90,3
36
197,3
63
50,0
47
802,3
74
159,7
20
212,6
93
1,9
99,4
74
His
panic
or
Latino (
of any r
ace)
4,2
05
14,6
70
1,4
95
2,8
96
502
20,6
07
4,2
25
4,7
84
53,3
84
M
exic
an
2,5
42
8,2
46
723
1,5
04
292
9,5
83
2,2
04
2,4
49
27,5
43
P
uert
o R
ican
435
1,3
66
150
407
49
2,1
11
427
651
5,5
96
C
uban
96
382
53
109
9682
103
210
1,6
44
O
ther
His
panic
or
Latino [
5]
1,1
32
4,6
76
569
876
152
8,2
31
1,4
91
1,4
74
18,6
01
Not
His
panic
or
Latino
114,6
06
353,4
60
88,8
41
194,4
67
49,5
45
781,7
67
155,4
95
207,9
09
1,9
46,0
90
HIS
PA
NIC
OR
LA
TIN
O A
ND
RA
CE
Tota
l popula
tion
118,8
11
368,1
30
90,3
36
197,3
63
50,0
47
802,3
74
159,7
20
212,6
93
1,9
99,4
74
His
panic
or
Latino
4,2
05
14,6
70
1,4
95
2,8
96
502
20,6
07
4,2
25
4,7
84
53,3
84
W
hite a
lone
2,0
95
6,4
84
809
1,9
19
294
10,0
57
1,9
64
3,1
26
26,7
48
B
lack o
r A
fric
an A
merican a
lone
64
509
37
50
91,2
04
92
102
2,0
67
A
merican India
n a
nd A
laska N
ative
alo
ne
36
164
27
54
8398
59
52
798
A
sia
n a
lone
20
52
33
20
2102
49
23
301
N
ative
Haw
aiian a
nd O
ther
Pacific
Isla
nder
alo
ne
19
49
53
2129
16
6229
S
om
e O
ther
Race a
lone
1,6
07
6,2
39
441
603
125
6,8
39
1,6
47
1,1
42
18,6
43
Tw
o o
r M
ore
Races
364
1,1
73
143
247
62
1,8
78
398
333
4,5
98
Not
His
panic
or
Latino
114,6
06
353,4
60
88,8
41
194,4
67
49,5
45
781,7
67
155,4
95
207,9
09
1,9
46,0
90
W
hite a
lone
106,9
55
310,1
83
84,4
06
187,3
31
48,4
86
542,2
73
143,4
30
189,3
05
1,6
12,3
69
B
lack o
r A
fric
an A
merican a
lone
2,9
28
26,4
63
2,2
53
2,2
34
291
204,7
48
7,2
67
6,8
38
253,0
22
A
merican India
n a
nd A
laska N
ative
alo
ne
192
606
99
349
79
1,2
19
235
289
3,0
68
A
sia
n a
lone
2,5
14
8,7
59
720
1,9
00
187
16,0
80
1,3
98
8,2
61
39,8
19
N
ative
Haw
aiian a
nd O
ther
Pacific
Isla
nder
alo
ne
76
239
15
58
24
474
139
93
1,1
18
S
om
e O
ther
Race a
lone
146
516
99
189
50
1,6
65
259
272
3,1
96
Tw
o o
r M
ore
Races
1,7
95
6,6
94
1,2
49
2,4
06
428
15,3
08
2,7
67
2,8
51
33,4
98
[1] O
ther
Asia
n a
lone, or
two o
r m
ore
Asia
n c
ate
gories.
[2] O
ther
Pacific
Isla
nder
alo
ne, or
two o
r m
ore
Native H
aw
aiia
n a
nd O
ther
Pacific
Isla
nder
cate
gories.
[3] O
ne o
f th
e f
our
most com
monly
report
ed m
ultip
le-r
ace c
om
bin
ations.
[4] In
com
bin
ation w
ith o
ne o
r m
ore
of
the o
ther
races lis
ted.
[5] This
cate
gory
is c
om
posed o
f people
whose o
rigin
s a
re f
rom
the D
om
icia
n R
epublic
, S
pain
and S
panis
h s
peakin
g C
entr
al or
South
Am
erican c
ountr
ies.
It a
lso inclu
des g
enera
l origin
responses s
uch a
s "
Latino"
or
"His
panic
."
Sourc
e: U
.S. C
ensus B
ure
au, 2010 C
ensus S
F1, D
P-1
Table
Top Related