Morphometry BIRNSemi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA)
JHU (CIS): M. F. Beg, C. Ceritoglu, A. Kolasny, M. I. Miller, R. YashinskiMGH (NMR): B. Fischl; BWH (SPL): S. Pieper; UCLA (LONI): D. Rex, A. W. Toga
Washington University (CNL): R. L. Buckner
Introduction:
Conclusions:
Morphometry BIRN
Integration issues when pooling software analysis and visualization tools are a challenging problem. Using a common data format to span multiple applications allows for integration and usability. Creating translation tools between formats is critical to integrating independent applications into a complete analysis pipeline.
We have processed data from a donor site (Wash. Univ.) with the Shape Analysis Processing Pipeline. Procedures for converting MGH surface data to LDDMM volumes data format have been developed. LDDMM natively interfaces with Slicer using the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) file format. With the processing pipeline in place, efforts to streamline the processing of large image data sets are taking place. Statistical Analysis of large groups of image data is under way.
BIRN Virtual Data Grid
Goals:
Requirements: Seamless and robust integration of MRI analysis and visualization tools that have been independently developed at different sites. Enable analysis of MRI data from any other site.
To develop a processing pipeline across multiple institutional sites that segments sub cortical structures from structural MRI data, computes the geodesics in the space of infinite dimensional diffeomorphisms, visualizes results and enables statistical analyses of the results. To use this approach to test the hypothesis that hippocampal shape differs between patients with Alzheimer’s disease and demographically matched healthy controls.
Data DonorSite
De-identification
Wash. Univ.T1 structural MRIAlzheimer’s and
Age-matched controlsImage Header: Subject: Juan Perez Patient ID: 911 …
Image Header: Subject: anon BIRN ID: 9284ka9e23sd… …
Data Upload
MGH FreesurferCortical &
Subcorticalsegmentations
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/
An
atom
ical segm
entatio
n
usin
g F
reeSu
rfer
Str
uct
ura
l MR
I dat
a ac
qu
ired
2
4
1
3. The derived segmented data (e.g., the hippocampus surfaces) can be downloaded by the JHU site and used for shape analysis using their Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping tool (LDDMM). These results are uploaded as new derived data in the BVDG.
JHULarge Deformation
Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping
Shape Analysis of Segmented Structures
http://www.cis.jhu.edu/software/lddmmSh
ape
An
alys
is u
sin
g L
DD
MM
3
1. 3D Structural MRI data with good gray-white matter contrast-to-noise ratio is acquired at a participating site. In order to be shared, the image data has to be de-identified within the site’s firewall: patient information is removed from the image headers and face information is stripped from the images while leaving the brain intact. The de-identified data is then uploaded to the BIRN Virtual Data Grid (BVDG) where it can be accessed by other participating sites.
2. The de-identified structural brain MRI data is automatically segmented using MGH’s FreeSurfer morphometry tools. The segmentation results are uploaded to the BVDG as derived data (surfaces, volumes, labels).
4. The combined morphometric results (surfaces, volumes, labels, deformation fields) can be viewed from the BVDG using 3D Slicer as the common visualization platform.
UCLA
Brighamand Women’s
Hospital Johns Hopkins
University
Brain Imaging and
Analysis Center
BWH3D Slicer
Visualization of segmentation and shape
analysis results
http://www.slicer.org/
Visu
alization
of resu
lts from
a co
mm
on
platfo
rm
4
Top Related