UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
SCHOOL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING
Survey Report:
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of
Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Submitted to:
Prof. Ma. Sheilah G. Napalang, Dr. Eng.
Professor
Submitted By:
Esquejo, Christian
Gatus, Rolyn Mae T.
Guerrero, Michelliza
Levanto, Jose Roberto
Molo, Eric Armand
Serrano, Vinson P.
Plan 299 B
September 2012
Table of Contents
Title Page
Table of Contents
I. Introduction 1
II. Research Topic and Research Question 1
III. Significance of the Study 2
IV. Target Respondents 3
V. Information Needs 3
VI. Comments on the Survey Questionnaire 4
VII. Sampling Size 10
VIII. Results and Analysis of Survey 11
IX. Conclusion and Recommendation 25
X. Bibliography 26
List of Figures
Figure No. Title Page
No.
Figure 6.1. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire (Profile of the Survey
Respondent)
5
Figure 6.2. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Profile of the Survey
Respondent)
5
Figure 6.3. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire (Question 1) 5
Figure 6.4. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire (Question 3) 6
Figure 6.5. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Question 2) 6
Figure 6.6. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Question 4) 7
Figure 6.7. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire (Question 4
Subcategory 2)
7
Figure 6.8. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Question 2
Subcategory 1)
7
Figure 6.9. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Questions 4 & 5) 8
Figure 6.10. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire (Question 6) 8
Figure 6.11. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire (Question 12) 9
Figure 6.12. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Question 12) 9
Figure 6.13. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Question 14) 9
Figure 6.14. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Road Sign Question 1) 10
Figure 6.15. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire (Question 16 Question
on Traffic Rules and Regulations)
10
Figure 8.1. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents per Type of Sex 11
Figure 8.2. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents Per Educational
Attainment
11
Figure 8.3. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents Per Civil Status 12
Figure 8.4. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents per Type of Sex 12
Figure 8.5. Distribution of Place of Residence of the Respondents 13
Figure 8.6. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents Per Number of
Years Driving a Motorcycle
13
Figure 8.7. Scores of respondents passing the traffic rules and regulations
exam
(passing score 50%)
14
Figure 8.8. Scores of 43 Respondents Failing the Traffic Rules and
Regulations Exam
15
Figure 8.9. Scores of 43 Respondents Failing the Traffic Rules and
Regulations Exam
15
Figure 8.10. Scores of 43 Respondents Failing the Traffic Rules and
Regulations Exam
17
Figure 8.11. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
18
Figure 8.12. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
19
Figure 8.13 Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
20
Figure 8.14. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
22
Figure 8.15. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
22
Figure 8.16. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
23
Figure 8.17. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
23
Figure 8.18. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
24
Figure 8.19. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
24
Figure 8.20. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
25
List of Tables
Table No. Title Page
No.
Table 8.1. Table Showing Perceived vs Actual Degree of Awareness to Traffic
Rules and Regulations
16
Table 8.2. Tabulation of Educational Attainment and Actual Scores of
Respondents
16
Table 8.3. Perceived Causes of Accidents along Commonwealth Avenue 17
Table 8.4. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
18
Table 8.5. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
19
Table 8.6. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
21
Table 8.7. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
21
List of Appendices
Tabulated Results
Photos of the Final Survey Conduct
Sample Pilot Questionnaire
Final Survey Questionnaire
Compilation of Pilot Survey Questionnaires
Compilation of Final Survey Questionnaires
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 1
I. Introduction
Motorcycle Driving: A Traffic and Transportation Management Issue
Transportation, like any other urban planning concern gives numerous effects
on the development of a community. This does not only serve as an artery of a
town, a city, or a simple community to be accessible in other parts of a region, but
also to allow the place to be penetrable- that may lead to contributory effect on
other sectors primarily on socio- economic activities. Thus, transportation acts as
a life of a particular place.
On the recent years, motorcycles have become an alarming concern of traffic
and transportation management in Metropolitan Manila. Brought by the ever-
increasing price of crude oil in the market and the need for commuters to survive
transportation up to their allowable means, motorcycles have become more
accessible to the public. Since motorcycles were provided with schemes on
payment which are seemed appropriate to the commuting community, this mode
of transportation did not only become an item of commodity but also of
convenience.
In relation to this timely and relevant issue, the Survey Team wants to know
the level of perception of motorcycle riders’ safety, focusing on riders traversing
the stretch of Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City, PH. This study aims to get
information on the profile of motorcycle riders, their basic considerations on
driving, and to get a grasp on their competency on driving in order to arrive with
necessary data need to be analyzed which will be used as basis for the arriving of
conclusion for this particular topic.
II. Research Topic and Research Questions
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of
Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
The survey aims to measure the perception of motorcycle riders traversing the
stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with regards to safe driving. The Survey Team
decided to conduct the survey at Ever Gotesco Mall located along Commonwealth
Avenue, Quezon City, since Commonwealth Avenue has a dedicated motorcycle
lane and has been known to be a main commuting route of motorcycle riders
coming to and from Metropolitan Manila.
In line with this, for the research to be effective on the extraction of required
data from the main survey questionnaire, the survey aims to answer the following
questions:
1. What is the level of perception of motorcycle riders traversing the stretch of
Commonwealth Avenue with regards to safe driving?
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 2
2. Is there a direct correlation between the awareness of motorcycle riders on
safety driving with regards to their number of years on driving experience?
3. Is there a direct correlation between the awareness of motorcycle riders on
safety driving with regards to their educational attainment?
4. Is there a direct correlation between the awareness of motorcycle riders on
safety driving with regards to their frequency of trips made along
Commonwealth Avenue?
III. Significance of the Study
Commonwealth Avenue: Main Study Area
Based on statistics given by the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority
(MMDA) on the year 2010, there were 2,000 recorded accidents that happened
within the stretch of Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. According to a news
article (Endoso, et.al, 2011) published at Inquirer Online, Commonwealth Avenue
is dubbed the ‘killer highway’ because of the high occurrence of vehicular
accidents there.”1 According to the same report, that in the same year- at least 21
people were killed while 608 others were injured in more than 2,000 accidents that
took place on the highway. This equates to almost 8 percent of the total number of
road accidents that occurred in Quezon City in the same year. There were around
26,000 accidents happened in the whole of Quezon City, with 4,800 injuries and
150 fatalities in the same period.
A road incident made the MMDA prepare to re-evaluate its road traffic
scheme on Commonwealth Avenue, following the accident that killed a veteran
journalist and university professor named Lourdes Estella-Simbulan.
This significant incident led to the implementation of the MMDA of a 60-
kilometer-per-hour speed limit on the 12.4-km avenue on Jan. 25, 2010. MMDA
Chairman Francis Tolentino had earlier cited studies that 60 kph was the right
speed for drivers to maintain their reflexes that in effect would minimize
accidents.
Motorcycle Driving: Is It Safe?
According to statistics published in 2007 by the World Health Organization
Regional Office for the Western Pacific Region said that young motorcycle riders
make up a significant percentage of injuries and fatalities among road users in the
region. On the same report, speeding, the non-use of helmets, risk-taking
1 Endozo, P., Aurelio, J., 2011. Accident prompts MMDA crackdown in ‘killer highway’. Inquirer Online,
[online] 15 May. Available at: <http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20110515-
336582/Accident-prompts-MMDA-crackdown-in-killer-highway> [Accessed 14 Sept 2012].
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 3
behaviour, and drunk-driving contribute to a significant portion of the motorcycle
accidents.
A significant statistics showed that motorcycle riders can cut the risk of death
by almost 40% and the risk of severe injury by 72% if they wear proper helmets.
The MMDA’s Metro Manila Accident Reporting and Analysis System
(MMARAS) revealed that most of the 20,151 accidents it recorded from January
to May 2009 mainly involved motorcycles. In a study that covered accidents in
2009, the MMARAS said motorcycles have the highest fatality accident rate
(29.46% of the total fatal accidents) compared to other vehicles. For non-fatal
incidents, motorcycles also had the highest rate (6,677 or a 36.78% share)
compared to cars (4,543 or 25.02%) and other vehicles.2
IV. Target Respondents
This survey aims to get respondents that are motorcycle riders traversing the
stretch of Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City. In order to extract the necessary
information for this particular survey, respondents must be a motorcycle driver,
with no specific consideration on age, gender, educational attainment, and
occupation/work.
Location is a primary consideration in gathering information when conducting
a survey. Survey respondent were mainly gathered from the designated parking
area of Ever Gotesco Mall along Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City where
most of the motorcycle riders have already traversed the Commonwealth Avenue.
The team decided to conduct the survey on this particular area due to the large
number of motorcycle riders converging on this area and also to ensure that the
respondents are qualified.
V. Information Needs
For the successful conduct of the survey, the following information needs are
necessary for the Survey Team to arrive with the data to be extracted from the
survey results. The information needs required for this survey are as follows:
1. Number of traffic of motorcycles traversing commonwealth avenue
2. Number of accidents that are motorcycle-related
3. Frequency of trips along commonwealth per day
4. Causes of accidents along commonwealth (motorcycle-related)
5. Knowledge of respondents on maximum speed
2 Malig, J., 2010. Motorcycles rule Philippine roads. ABS-CBN News Online, [online] 14 October. Available
at: < http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/lifestyle/10/14/10/motorcycles-rule-philippine-roads> [Accessed 19 Sept
2012].
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 4
6. Awareness on safety gear (e.g. helmet, padding)
7. Weather conditions affecting motorcycle driving
8. Awareness on traffic signs and regulations
9. Physical conditions (fitness to drive) while driving a motorcycle
10. Awareness for safe driving distance, knowledge that motorcycle is equivalent
to 1 car so safe driving distance must be maintained
VI. Comments on the Survey Questionnaire
The Survey Team conducted the pilot survey on September 8, 2012, Saturday,
at 4:00 PM. During the conduct of the pilot survey, a total number of fifty
respondents (50) answered the pilot survey questionnaire that lead to further
development of the final survey questionnaire. Comments were gathered and from
there, re-evaluation of survey questions was carefully done to address every given
issue.
After revision of the pilot survey questionnaire, a total number of ninety (98)
respondents answered the final survey questionnaire that has become basis of the
survey results and analysis.
Some of the significant comments from the survey respondents of the Pilot
survey were assessed by the Survey Team. Among the comments evaluated,
revision was done in consideration of transforming every survey question to
generate a better result and to give a good variety of choices based on the
principles of a good survey questionnaire.
The Survey Questionnaire was divided into two parts: the first part generally
describes the profile of the survey respondent, with questions on 1) name, 2) age,
3) sex, 4) civil status, 5) occupation/profession, 6) educational attainment, and 7)
present address while the second part was designated for the main survey
questions.
During the course of the Pilot Survey, most of the survey respondents don’t
want to specify their names on the survey forms. When one of the respondents
was asked ‘why they opt not to indicate their identity’, a few of them told the
Survey Team that they feel afraid that they can be reported to the Land
Transportation Office (LTO) due to the disclosed personal information despite
indicating ‘optional’ on the part of the survey.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 5
Figure 6.1. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire
(Profile of the Survey Respondent)
Figure 6.2. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Profile of the Survey Respondent)
Figure 6.3. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire
(Question 1)
Such comment made the Survey Team decide to omit the question to the final
survey questionnaire, only to retain age, sex, civil status, occupation/profession,
educational attainment, and present address as part of questions for the profile of
survey respondent
On the second part of the survey, the question on the ability of the survey
respondent to drive a motorcycle was removed since the target respondents were
primarily motorcycle riders thus made the question leading.
If the then question was answered ‘no’, the survey form would already been
invalid. This made the Survey Team pre-determine every potential survey
respondent if they have the knowledge on motorcycle driving. If the respondent
would answer ‘yes’, then the respondent was subsequently asked if they would
want to participate on the survey.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 6
Figure 6.4. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire
(Question 3)
Figure 6.5. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Question 2)
The question on “How did you learn to drive a motorcycle?” was re-
categorized to two answers: 1) Self-taught, and 2) Taught by others, while the
second option was further sub-categorized into five answers: 1) Family, 2) Friend,
3) Driving School, 4) Doesn’t know, refused, and 5) Others (specify)
As per Team’s assessment, choices given on the Pilot Survey can be improved
in terms of grouping so classification of answers can be assessed more
appropriately.
After conducting the pilot survey, the Team realized the need to re-categorize
after encountering comments on the choices as per survey respondents.
Questions relating on ‘time’ was revised and re-categorized into a more
substantial grouping. Instead of a simple indication of time frame, descriptors for
each frame were placed to improve measurability of the choices given.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 7
Figure 6.8. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Question 2 Subcategory 1)
Figure 6.7. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire
(Question 4 Subcategory 2)
Figure 6.6. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Question 4)
Four choices were given: 1) Early morning, 2) Morning, 3) Afternoon, and 4)
Evening. These were easily considered by the respondents as witnessed during the
conduct of the final survey.
A distinction on ‘types’ of trips were considered on Question 3, which asks
‘What is the purpose of those trips? Check ALL that applies’
The choices were transformed to better categories since the previous question on
the Pilot survey was leading.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 8
Figure 6.10. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire
(Question 6)
A separate question on inbound (from destination to home), and outbound
trips (from home to destination) was provided that led the question come up with
choices that are mutually exclusive to each other.
On the analysis of respondents if they have encountered any accidents or
suffered any injury on the trips they have made while traversing Commonwealth
Avenue, refinement of categories was done to eliminate ambiguity.
Figure 6.9. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Questions 4 & 5)
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 9
Figure 6.11. Portion of the Pilot Survey Questionnaire
(Question 12)
Figure 6.12. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Question 12)
Figure 6.13. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Question 14)
Four areas of concerns were given on the choices: 1) human error, 2)
mechanical defect, 3) external weather condition, 4) external physical condition.
On the given premise, extraction of data can be easily categorized.
A question on how would you rate/consider yourself as a motorcycle driver, a
parameter was added to help respondents answer the question with much more
clarity.
Due to subjectivity of the question, the parameter gave a certain criterion to be
considered for rating.
To test the aptitude of respondents on their awareness on traffic rules and
regulations, series of questions were laid out which are sourced from an actual
driving aptitude test.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 10
Figure 4.14. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Road Sign Question 1)
Figure 6.14. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Road Sign Question 1)
Figure 6.15. Portion of the Final Survey Questionnaire
(Question 16 Question on Traffic Rules and Regulations)
These questions would validate their answers based on the results of the
respondent’s driving aptitude test.
Identification of road signs was also given on the survey questionnaire for the
same purpose of the questions on driving aptitude test.
Questions were provided with Filipino Language Translation so as to make the
questions more comprehensible.
All revisions made on the Pilot survey questionnaire mainly composed the
Final survey questionnaire.
VII. Sampling Size
The sample size was determined by the number of parking slots on the Ever
Gotesco Mall. Based on Neuman’s Rule of Thumb, given a population of less than
a thousand would determine a target survey respondent population of 30%, which
is 66 respondents. During the Pilot Survey, a total number of 47 were gathered
while a total of 98 respondents answered the Final survey questionnaire.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 11
Figure 8.1. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents per Type of Sex
Figure 8.2. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents
Per Educational Attainment
VIII. Results and Analysis of Survey
A. Profile of the Survey Respondents
The above figure shows that majority of the respondents are male and only 4
out of 95 respondents are female. It is also apparent that we observe most male
motorcycle riders in the streets rather than female. It is however a limitation of
this survey that not all gender preferences was captured. The purpose is to identify
and represent transgenders, lesbians and gays apart from the male-female
proportion to make sure that there is somehow proper distribution in terms of
gender equality among the respondents.
The chart above shows that majority of the survey respondents attended
college levels (68%) followed by those who reached high school (32%). No
respondent answered Elementary as their highest educational attainment.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 12
Figure 8.3. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents
Per Civil Status
Figure 8.4. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents per Type of Sex
The chart above shows that a larger portion of the respondents (59%) are
married while not so much difference in the number of single respondents which
comprise of the rest of 41%.
The researchers of the study found it important to know the type of occupation
of the survey respondents. From the 95 respondents who disclosed their
occupation, 65% are in blue collar jobs. Their occupations are mostly security
guards, drivers, company messengers, store merchandisers, restaurant crews and
some are public servants such as traffic enforcer and barangay police (tanod). The
28% or 26 respondents represent the white collar workers. Typical professions are
teacher, soldier, salesperson, office employee and supervisor and others are
businessman. The remaining 7 % are not employed.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 13
Figure 8.5. Distribution of Place of Residence of the Respondents
Figure 8.6. Distribution of Motorcycle Riders Respondents
Per Number of Years Driving a Motorcycle
The graph above shows that majority of the respondents’ place of residence is
at Quezon City since the research study area is at Commonwealth Avenue. The
remaining 30% of the respondents lives in other parts of NCR such as Manila,
Pasig, Caloocan, Makati, San Juan, Paranaque and Las Pinas and in neighboring
provinces such as Rizal and Bulacan.
This research survey basically aimed at measuring the awareness of
motorcycle riders to safe drivers and the researchers found it relevant to know the
length of motorcycle driving experience of the respondents. The results revealed
that more than half of the respondents have been driving for more than five years
and it comprises of almost 76% of the respondents who has more than two years
of driving practice.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 14
Figure 8.7. Scores of respondents passing the traffic rules and regulations exam
( passing score 50%)
B. Results of the Survey
The research focused in determining whether the awareness that respondents
claimed they had with regards safe driving was indeed an accurate awareness of
safe driving, as measured by the 9- item rules and regulations test that the research
group incorporated in the survey. The actual scores on the actual 9- item rules and
regulations test was considered as the measure in determining their true awareness
of safe driving.
The outcome of the survey shows that 94 out of the 95 valid respondents
claimed that they were aware of traffic rules and regulations, or about 98.95% of
the population answered yes to Q13.
However, when the actual scores on the traffic rules and regulations test were
tabulated, the result shows that given a passing score of 50% ( scores 5 and
above), only 51 out of the 94 respondents passed the test, or 54.25% of the
population. Close to half of the population failed in the traffic rules and
regulations awareness test. This survey result shows that in 4.5 out of 10 cases,
perception of safe driving is very far from accurate awareness on safe driving, as
seen by the survey results. Figure 7.7 show the actual scores of the 51
respondents who claimed they were aware of the traffic rules and regulations and
whose safe driving awareness was validated by the passing scores that they got
from the test.
Calculation of Central Tendencies for scores 5-8
Mode Score: 5
Median Score: 6
Mean Score: 5.78
The results showed further that while the 54 respondents were classified as
“passed”, given a passing score of 50% ( scores 5 and above), the scores were
closer to the lowest passing hurdle of 5, thereby less than satisfactory results and
therefore indicating less than satisfactory and accurate awareness of safe
driving.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 15
Figure 8.8. Scores of 43 Respondents Failing the Traffic Rules and Regulations Exam
Figure 8.9. Scores of 43 Respondents Failing the Traffic Rules and Regulations Exam
In fact, if passing rate was increased to 75% ( scores 7 and above), only about
20.37%, or 11 out of the 54 respondents of the population would have passed and
would have been considered accurately aware of traffic rules and regulations.
Figure 7.8 on the other hand shows the actual scores of the 43 respondents
who perceived themselves aware of traffic rules and regulations but upon the rules
and regulations test validation, actually failed the test.
Calculation of Central Tendencies for scores 2-4
Mode Score: 4
Median Score: 4
Mean Score 3.32
The research group attempted to further drew from the survey how
respondents rated and their own perceived degree of knowledge on traffic rules
and regulations ( Q12 in the survey) and the responses to this question were
tabulated against the actual score results, based on the following set rating:
Scores 1- to 4 = Poor
Scores 5 to 6 = Satisfactory
Scores 7-8 = Very Satisfactory
Score 9 = Excellent
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 16
Table 8.1. Table Showing Perceived vs Actual Degree of
Awareness to Traffic Rules and Regulations
Table 8.2. Tabulation of Educational Attainment and Actual Scores of Respondents
The results show that alarmingly, around 59% of the population, or 16 out of
the 27 respondents, who perceived themselves “excellent” in the knowledge on
traffic rules and regulations actually were validated in the study as “poor” based
on the actual scores that they got from the traffic and regulations awareness test.
The results indicate that respondents tended to overestimate their knowledge on
traffic rules and regulations.
This research also attempted to answer the question if there was a correlation
between educational attainment and awareness on safe driving, as measured by the
traffic rules and regulations awareness test. The table below would indicate that
college level respondents are not better off than high school level respondents in
terms of awareness to safe driving as seen by the significant failure rate among the
college level population. While the highschool level population had a higher
failure rate of 57% (17 out of 30 respondents), the college level population had a
double digit failure rate of 42% ( 27 out of 65 respondents)%, albeit smaller
compared to high school level statistics.
With this, it can be concluded that there is not much difference between the
two groups in terms of passing percentage. We therefore, could not directly
conclude from the survey results that a lower educational attainment means a
lesser awareness of safe driving , as measured by the traffic and regulations
awareness test score outcome .
Respondents' Own
Rating on Perceived
Degree of Awareness
on Traffic Rules and
Regulations
Validated Actual Degree of Awareness
Total Poor Satisfactory
Very
Satisfactory Excellent
Poor 2 1 0 0 3
Satisfactory 17 22 4 0 43
Very Satisfactory 8 7 6 0 21
Excellent 16 10 1 0 27
Total 43 40 11 0 94
Educational
Attainment
Scores
Total Passed
( Absolute No. )
Passed
( %)
Failed
( Absolute No. )
Failed
(%)
College 38 58% 27 42% 65
High Sschool 13 43% 17 57% 30
Total 51 44 95
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 17
Table 8.3. Perceived Causes of Accidents along Commonwealth Avenue
Figure 8.10. Scores of 43 Respondents Failing the Traffic Rules and Regulations Exam
The research group also attempted to draw from the survey the actual
awareness of drivers on the occurrence of accidents along Commonwealth Avenue
by way of Q6. A further realization of the group was that the Q6 could have been
further improved to draw out separate the respondents who simply witnessed an
accident happening along Commonwealth Avenue from those respondents who
were the ones who encountered the accidents themselves.
On the question Q6, the group was able to get 70.5% Affirmative response, or
67 out of the 95 respondents said yes to witnessing or encountering an accident
along Commonwealth Avenue.. This is quite a significant percentage of
population awareness on the occurrence of accidents and validates MMDA
published reports of Commonwealth Avenue having a high occurrence of
vehicular accidents, thru this first hand information from the survey results.
In 7 out of 10 cases, there is motorcycle driver awareness of occurrence of
accidents along Commonwealth Avenue.
Interestingly, majority of the respondents perceived that the accident or
accidents were caused by driver error, amongst all other causes. Figure 6 lists
the 5 causes as provided in the survey and a provision for others (respondents not
checking any of the 5 choices) and the number of times that the cause was
mentioned. Out of the total 95 respondents, 54 respondents perceived Driver
Error as the cause. There is a greater number of people who perceive that most of
the accidents are caused by driver error.
Amongst all other probable causes mentioned, there is a greater perception
that accidents are caused by driver error, or 49% with 111 total responses.
A rating system was made to further categorize the scores of the population
namely: Excellent, Very Satisfactory, Satisfactory and Poor. For a total score of 9,
score of 5 was considered as the passing rate.
Scores 1- to 4 = Poor
Scores 5 to 6 = Satisfactory
Scores 7-8 = Very Satisfactory
Score 9 = Excellent
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 18
0
5
10
15
20
25
Number of Drivers
w ho took the exams
less than
a year
1 to 2 2 to 5 more than
5
Number of Years Driving
Number of Years Driving as to Drivers' Ratings in the Exams
Poor Rating
Satisfactory Rating
Very Satisfacto ry Rating
Table 8.4. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
Figure 8.11. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
From the test conducted, there were no drivers who got a perfect score (9) or
Excellent rating. 44 of the 95 respondents (46%) got a Poor rating, followed by
the number of respondents who got a satisfactory rating (40 out of 95% or 42%)
and only 11 respondents got a very satisfactory rating.
Above is the cross-tabulation of the number of drivers’ years in driving to
their corresponding ratings in the exam. Looking at the number of respondents
according to the years of driving experience, majority (51 out of 95) of the
respondents classified themselves having 5 or more years of driving experience.
Same number of people (11) registered in the less than a year and 1 to 2 years
experience categories. Motorcyclists with 2 to 5 years experience comprises twice
(22) the number of less than-a-year experience drivers.
Of the 51 respondents with more than 5 years driving experience, 23 of them
got poor ratings, 22 got satisfactory rating while only 6 achieved a very
satisfactory rating; which does not prove the assumption that as drivers tend to
have more experience in driving, they will be more aware of the safe driving
policies. Poor ratings have been dominant / greatest in number in three of the four
categories, 7 (out of 11) respondents with less than a year experience, 11 (out of
22) respondents with 2 to 5 years experience and 23 (out of 51) respondents with
more than 5 years experience. It was only in the 1 to 2 years category that poor
rating was only second in number to the satisfactory rating.
Rating
Years Driving Poor Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Excellent Total
less than a year 7 3 1 0 11
1 to 2 years 3 7 1 0 11
2 to 5 years 11 8 3 0 22
more than 5 Years 23 22 6 0 51
Total 44 40 11 0 95
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 19
Table 8.5. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percentage
less than a year 1 to 2 years 2 to 5 years more than 5
Years
Category (Number of Years)
Percentage of Drivers rating in the Exam PER Category
Poor
Satisfactory
Very Satisfactory
Figure 8.12. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
The bar graph shows the distribution of the population according to years in
driving experience. Majority of our respondents have more than 5 years driving
experience. Only 3 bars (Poor, Satisfactory and Very satisfactory) per category are
displayed instead of four since no one got a perfect score or excellent rating.
It is shown that among the categories, the poor and satisfactory ratings are
evidently higher as compared to the very satisfactory rating. This means, only a
few respondents got high scores.
Another table is shown below cross-tabulating again the years of driving
experience to their corresponding ratings in the Exam. The purpose of this
tabulation is to get the percentage of people who got the poor, satisfactory and
very satisfactory ratings EXCLUSIVE to their own categories. That is, the sum of
the percentages of drivers’ rating should be 100% for every category. This aims to
easily compare the 4 categories and their respective ratings.
Rating
Years Driving Poor Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Excellent Total 100%
less than a year 64 27 9 0 100
1 to 2 years 27 64 9 0 100
2 to 5 years 50 36 14 0 100
more than 5 Years 45 43 12 0 100
Looking at the graph shown, Percentage of having poor rating is very high
(64%) for drivers with less than 1 year driving experience, significantly decreased
(27%) for 1 to 2 years experienced drivers, but increased again to 50% for drivers
with 2 to 5 years experience. For more than 5 years experience drivers, 45% of the
respondents on that category still got poor rating, This graph does not necessary
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 20
Figure 8.13 Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Years of Driving
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
correlates that the longer the driving experience is, the higher the driving safety
awareness.
Twenty-Seven percent of drivers with less than 1year driving experience got a
satisfactory rating, this increased to 64% for 1 to 2 years experience drivers,
decreased again to 36% for the 3 to 5 years experience drivers and increased to
43% to drivers having more than 5 years experience.
Moreover, the very satisfactory ratings remained lowest for the four categories
ranging from 9 to 14%.
Evaluating the entire graph, we can say that the drivers with 1 to 2 years
driving experience registered good results in the exams. Fewer respondents in this
category (27%) failed the exams, while majority of them got satisfactory ratings.
This may not lead to a direct conclusion but may be recommended for additional
study to check if drivers are MORE aware when they have 1 to 2 years experience
than having much longer experience in driving.
Based from existing ratings, the group decided to narrow it down to either
PASS or FAIL. A score is considered passing if respondents got 5 to 9 points. Fail
if scores are 4 and below.
Graph shows the distribution of Passing and Failing marks correlating to their
number of driving experience. Drivers in the 1 to 2 years driving experience
registered the highest percentage (73%) of passing rate compared to other
categories. While the less than 1 year category is the sole category which
registered more failing percentage than passing percentage.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 21
Table 8.6. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
Table 8.7. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
A
Above is the cross-tabulation showing the profile and distribution of the
respondents on the frequency in traversing Commonwealth Avenue to their
corresponding ratings in the exam. Majority (49 out of 95) of the respondents take
1 to 2 trips per day passing there. Followed by 2 to 4 trips (28 respondents); only
12 respondents take more than 6 trips a day while 6 respondents take 4 to 6 trips a
day.
Another table is shown below cross-tabulating again the motorcyclists’
frequency of trips a day to their corresponding ratings in the Exam. The purpose
of this tabulation is to get the percentage of people who got the poor, satisfactory
and very satisfactory ratings exclusive to their own categories. That is, the sum of
the percentages of drivers’ rating should be 100% for every category. This aims to
easily compare the 4 categories and their respective ratings.
Rating
Frequency of trips Poor Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Total %
1 to 2 trips 49% 41% 10% 100
2 to 4 trips 39 46 14 100
4 to 6 trips 67 17 17 100
more than six trips 42 50 8 100
Rating
Frequency of trips Poor Satisfactory
Very
Satisfactory Total
1 to 2 trips 24 20 5 49
2 to 4 trips 11 13 4 28
4 to 6 trips 4 1 1 6
more than six trips 5 6 1 12
total 44 40 11 95
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 22
Figure 8.14. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
Figure 8.15. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
From the graph shown, it is obvious that the highest percentage of poor ratings
come from the drivers who have 4 to 6 trips per day (67%). Drivers with 1 to 2
trips registered 49%, 39% for drivers having 2 to 4 trips and 42 percent for drivers
with more than 6 trips.
Fifty percent among the respondents with more than six trips got satisfactory
ratings which is the highest in the 4 categories. Drivers in the 4 to 6 trips category
got the lowest percentage in terms of satisfactory rating.
The table below shows the correlation of the motorcyclists’ frequency of trips
per day as compared to their ratings in the exam. The rating is narrowed down to
either pass or fail.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 23
Figure 8.17. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of
Trips Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
Figure 8.16. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of Trips
Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
By comparing the four categories, only the group with 4 to 6 trips daily
registered higher percentage of respondents who failed than pass. Other groups
have higher Passing percentage than failing percentage.
Based from the survey, we have generated results on some remarkable items
or acts that they usually do for safe driving. 100% of respondents who answered
that they wear safety gears also answered helmets as part of the usual safety gear
they wear. This generates a conclusion that when we talk about safety gears, the
first thing that always comes first in their mind is the helmet. Other safety gears
included in the choices are: Eye protection (50%) , Gloves (54%) , Jacket (79%),
Long Pants (73%), Body armor (20%) Closed shoes (64%). On the other hand, we
asked respondents about the number of back rides they allow while driving, more
than half (64%) of the respondents answered 1 back ride which is the requirement
for a safe trip. In addition to it, 78% of the respondents also answered that their
gears have reflective properties attached which is a good measure for a safe trip
esp. during night travels.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 24
Figure 8.19. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of
Trips Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
Figure 8.18. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of
Trips Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
The four pie charts show the correlation of the respondent who personally
rates themselves to their actual scores or ratings in the exams. For the first pie
chart, 27 out of the 95 respondents personally rate themselves Excellent in the
awareness of traffic rules and regulations. However, their personal rating does not
match to the actual ratings they got from the survey exam. More than half (59%)
of them got a poor rating, 37% got satisfactory rating while only 4% got a very
satisfactory rating. Unfortunately, none of the respondents got an excellent rating.
The Second Pie chart shows data for the motorcyclist who personally rated
themselves Very Satisfactory in terms of their knowledge in the Safety rules and
Regulation. 4 people rate themselves Very satisfactory. Among the 4, 75% or 3
respondents got poor rating while 1 (25%) got Satisfactory rating. No one who
considered himself very satisfactory got a very satisfactory or excellent rating in
the exam.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 25
Figure 8.20. Cross Tabulation of the Motorcycle Drivers’ Frequency of
Trips Corresponding to their Ratings in the Exams
The Third Pie chart shows the data for respondents who rated themselves
satisfactory in their knowledge with the traffic rules and regulations. A larger
portion of the pie was occupied by the respondents who personally rated
themselves satisfactory (43 out of 95 or 45%). Based on their exams,40% got poor
rating, 9% got Very satisfactory rating and more than half (51%) got a satisfactory
rating.
For the respondents who rated themselves poor in the traffic rules and
regulations (21 out of 95), 38% got poor rating, 33% satisfactory and 39% very
satisfactory.
By the data gathered, we cannot conclude the correlation of their personal
rating to the actual rating derived from the results on the exam.
IX. Conclusion and Recommendation
As a conclusion, 54% of the respondents (motorcycles riders) traversing
Commonwealth Avenue are aware of traffic rules and regulations, as measured by
the traffic rules and regulations awareness test. Through the analysis given on the
extrapolated data, the Survey could not directly conclude correlation between the
following factors: 1) level of perception in relation to educational attainment, 2)
level of perception in relation to frequency of trips made along Commonwealth
Avenue, and 3) level of perception in relation to number of years in driving with
safety awareness as observed on the statistics provided on the analysis.
This study also show that majority of respondents are males so the survey
could not directly conclude awareness on a specific gender.
SURVEY REPORT
Measuring the Perception of Motorcycle Riders Traversing the Stretch of Commonwealth Avenue with Regards to Safe Driving
Page | 26
X. Bibliography
Endozo, P., Aurelio, J., 2011. Accident prompts MMDA crackdown in ‘killer
highway’. Inquirer Online, [online] 15 May. Available at:
<http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20110515-
336582/Accident-prompts-MMDA-crackdown-in-killer-highway> [Accessed
14 Sept 2012].
Malig, J., 2010. Motorcycles rule Philippine roads. ABS-CBN News Online,
[online] 14 October. Available at:
< http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/lifestyle/10/14/10/motorcycles-rule-
philippine-roads> [Accessed 19 Sept 2012].
Research Topic:
Measuring the perception of motorcycle riders traversing the stretch of Commonwealth Avenue
with regards to safe driving
Introduction:
Good Day!
As part of the requirements in our research class at UP Diliman School of Regional Planning
(UP-SURP), our group will study the Awareness of Motorcycle Riders to Safe Driving.
Obtaining feedback from you is an important input in our research. We would appreciate your
taking time to complete this survey. It will only take less than 5 minutes.
Rest assured that your responses will be confidential and will be compiled together and analyzed
as a group. Thank you very much.
Name of Group Members:
Serrano, Vinson
Guerrero, Michelliza
Gatus, Rolyn Mae
Molo, Eric Armand
Esquejo, Christian
Levanto, RJ
INSTRUCTION
Please read carefully and fill-up the spaces below. Kindly indicate your answer in part I-Profile
of Respondents and check the box that is appropriate in part II – the Survey proper.
I. Profile of the Survey Respondent:
Age: ______ Sex: ________ Civil Status: _______ Occupation/Profession: ______________
Educational Attainment: Elementary High School College
Present Address: (barangay and city)_________________________________________
II. Survey Questions:
1. How long have you been driving a motorcycle?
Gaano katagal ka nang nagmamaneho ng motorsiklo?
Less than a year (Wala pang isang taon)
One year- two years (1-2 taon)
Two years- five years (2-5 taon)
More than five years (higit sa limang taon)
2. How did you learn to drive a motorcycle?
Paano ka natutong magmaneho ng motorsiklo?
Self-taught (Sariling Pag-aaral)
Taught by others (Tinuruan ng iba)
From Family Members (Kamag-anak)
From Friends (Kaibigan)
Driving school (Draybing Iskul)
Doesn’t know, refused (Hindi tiyak)
Others, specify (Iba pang kadahilanan)
2. On an average, how many one-way trips you make along Commonwealth within a
day?
Sa karaniwan, ilang isang-tungong biyahe (one-way) ang iyong ginagawa sa kahabaan
ng Commonwealth sa loob ng isang araw?
One to two trips (Isa hanggang dalawang biyahe)
Two to four trips (Dalawa hanggang apat na biyahe)
Four to six trips (Apat hanggang anim na biyahe)
More than six trips (Higit sa anim na biyahe)
What is the purpose of majority of your trips?
Ano ang kadalasang dahilan ng karamihan sa iyong mga biyahe?
School Related (Ukol sa gawaing-paaralan)
Work Related (Ukol sa gawaing-pangtrabaho)
Social Related (Leisure/ Recreational) (Ukol sa gawaing-pakikihalubilo )
4. What time of the day do you make outbound (home to destination) trips? (check all that
applies)
Sa anong oras sa loob ng isang araw ka bumabiyahe mula bahay patungo sa iyong
destinasyon? (markahan ang nauukol)
Early Morning (12:00AM to 6:00AM) (madaling araw)
Morning (6:00AM to 12:00 NN) (umaga)
Afternoon (12:00 NN to 6:00 PM) (hapon)
Evening (6:00 PM to 12:00 AM) (gabi)
5. What time of the day do you make inbound (destination to home) trips? (check all that
applies)
Sa anong oras sa loob ng isang araw ka bumabiyahe mula destinasyon patungo sa iyong
bahay? (markahan ang nauukol)
Early Morning (12:00AM to 6:00AM) (madaling araw)
Morning (6:00AM to 12:00 NN) (umaga)
Afternoon (12:00 NN to 6:00 PM) (hapon)
Evening (6:00 PM to 12:00 AM) (gabi)
6. Have you witnessed or encountered any accidents or suffered any injury on the trips you
have made while traversing Commonwealth Avenue?
Nakakita o nakaranas ka na ba ng kahit anong uri ng aksidente o disgrasya sa iyong mga
biyahe habang binabagtas ang kahabaan ng Commonwealth Avenue?
Yes (Oo)
No (Hindi)
If yes, then what could be the probable cause of the accident? (Please check ALL that
applies)
Kung oo, ano ang maaring naging dahilan ng aksidente?(markahan ang nauukol)
Weather Condition (Lagay ng panahon)
Driver Error (Pagkakamali ng nagmamaneho)
Mechanical Defect (Depekto ng motorsiklo)
Road Defect (Depekto ng kalsada)
Absence of Signage (Kakulangan sa Babala)
Others (Ibang dahilan)
_______________________________________________________________
7. Do you use protective/safety gear for driving?
Gumagamit ka ba ng gamit pamproteksyon para sa pagmamaneho?
Yes (Oo)
No (Hindi)
If yes, then which protective gear do you wear when you ride? (Please check)
Kung oo, alin sa mga sumusunod ang iyong mga sinusuot o ginagamit habang
nagmamaneho?
Helmet
Eye Protection
Gloves
Jacket
Long pants
Body armor
Closed Shoes
Others _______________________________________________________________
8. Does any of your gear currently have any high visibility or reflective properties?
Mayroon bang katangiang ‘nagre-reflect’ sa iyong mga ginagamit habang
nagmamaneho?
Yes (Oo)
No (Hindi)
9. What would be your primary reason/s for choosing motorcycle transport despite
availability of alternative modes of public or private transport?
Ano o Anu-ano ang mga pangunahing dahilan sa pagpili ng motorsiklo bilang
pangunahing transportasyon sa kabila ng pagkakaroon ng ibang alternatibong
pamamaraan ng pampubliko o pribadong sasakyan?
Please check ALL that applies (markahan ang nauukol)
Ease and Speed (Madali at Mabilis)
Economics- Affordability (Abot-kaya)
Prestige and Look of Riding a Motorcycle (Porma at itsura ng pagmamaneho ng
motorsiklo)
Comfort (Kumportable)
Others (Ibang dahilan)
_______________________________________________________________
10. For planned trips, were there instances that you needed to cancel it?
Para sa mga planadong mga biyahe, mayroon bang mga pagkakataon na kinailangan
mong ipagpaliban?
Yes (Oo)
No (Hindi)
If yes, what were the reasons? Please check ALL that applies
Kung oo, anu-ano ang mga maaring dahilan? (markahan ang nauukol)
Weather conditions (Lagay ng panahon)
Time – you don’t have enough time to go to your planned destination (Oras)
Sickness, injuries (Pagkakasakit o Pangkalusugan)
Safety of who will be backriding. (Kaligtasan ng mga naka-angkas)
Others, please specify (Ibang dahilan)
11. What is the maximum number of back ride you usually carry?
Ilan ang pinakarami mong kadalasang inaangkas?
1 (Isa)
2 (Dalawa)
3 (Tatlo)
More than 3 (Higit sa tatlo)
Who usually are your back rides?
Sino ang iyong kadalasang inaangkas?
Children (Mga anak)
Spouse (Asawa)
Girlfriend/Boyfriend (Kasintahan)
Parents (Magulang)
Relatives (Kamag-anak)
Workmates (Katrabaho)
Friends(Kaibigan)
Others (Iba pa) : ________________________
12. As a motorcycle driver, how would you rate your knowledge of traffic rules and
regulations?
Bilang isang drayber ng motorsiklo, paano mo susukatin ang kaalaman sa mga batas
trapiko?
Poor (Mababa)
Satisfactory (Katamtaman)
Very Satisfactory (Higit sa katamtaman)
Excellent (Mahusay)
13. Are you aware of traffic rules and regulations?
Ikaw ba ay may sapat na kaalam anmo ba ang mga batas trapiko?
Yes (Oo)
No (Hindi)
Questions on Traffic Rules and Regulations
14. Overtaking on the right side of the vehicle is allowed only on:
Maaari kang lumusot (overtake) sa kanang bahagi ng sasakyan kung:
Highways that has 2 or more lines on one way directions
(Ang highway ay may dalawa o higit pang linya patungo sa isang direksyon)
Two way roads (Ang kalsada ay salubungang-daan)
Wide sidewalks (Malapad ang bangketa)
15. The Penalty for driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol is
Ang mahuhuling lasing sa alak o ipinagbabawal na gamut ay may parusang:
Php 2000.00
6-month imprisonment (Pagkabilanggo ng anim na buwan)
One month license suspension (Isang buwan pagsuspinde ng lisensya)
16. Right age to get a non professional driver’s license
Ang tamang gulang sa pagkuha ng lisensya Non-Professional ay:
18 years old (18 taong gulang)
16 years old (16 taong gulang)
17 years old (17 taong gulang)
17. On a 2-lane highway overtaking is allowed only if there is :
Sa may highway na may dalawang guhit, maaari kang lumusot (overtake) kung sa iyong
panig ay may:
Straight white lines (Tuloy-tuloy na puting guhit)
Broken yellow lines (Putol-putol na dilaw na guhit )
Straight yellow lines (Tuloy-tuloy na dilaw na guhit)
18. What is the proper hand signal to use when turning right?
Sa naka-motorsiklo na may balak lumiko pakanan, dapat gamitin na senyas ay:
Left hand rising above (Kaliwang kamay na nakataas)
Right hand pointing right (Kanang kamay na diretsong nagtuturo pakanan)
Right hand rising above (Kanang kamay na nakataas)
Identify the following Road Signs Alin sa mga sumusunod ang nakalarawan
No entry (Bawal pumasok)
Stop (Huminto ka)
Give way (Magbigay ka)
No turning (Bawal ang lumiko)
One way (Isang direksyon lamang)
No entry of all classes of vehicles
(Bawal pumasok ang lahat ng klase ng sasakyan)
Approach to Intersection
(Papasok sa sangandaan)
Approach to Intersection: roundabout
(Sasanib sa trapiko pagpasok sa sangandaan)
Approach to Intersection: merging traffic
(Papasok sa sangandaan na may kalsada sa gilid)
Dangerous Right Bend (Matarik ang pababang direksyon ng kalsada)
Dangerous Left Bend Matarik ang paakyat na direksyon ng kalsada)
Steep Descent or Ascent (Matarik ang kalsada)
Compulsory minimum speed
(Ang layo ng susunod na interseksyon ay 30 km)
Maximum speed of 30 kph (Nakatakdang haba ng sasakyan)
End of compulsory minimum speed (Nakatakdang tulin ng sasakyan)
Top Related