Managing Electronic Resources: Managing Electronic Resources: A Merry-Go-Round Process of A Merry-Go-Round Process of
Adaptation and ChangeAdaptation and Change
Wong Ming KanWong Ming KanAcquisitions LibrarianAcquisitions Librarian
HKUST LibraryHKUST Library
20 April 201020 April 2010
2
ContentsContents
• HKUST Library in 1997
• Technological advancement
in information delivery
• ERM developments
• Library’s adaptations and
changes using ERM
• Concluding remarks
3
HKUST Library in 1997 HKUST Library in 1997
4
Development Efforts of Development Efforts of Library Automation Vendors in 1997 Library Automation Vendors in 1997 [1]
Pamela Cibbarelli (1997) observed four interrelatedtechnological developments
1. Migration from host/terminal systems to client server architecture:As the libraries expand the use of the terminals to include access to the Internet, other internal databases, CD-ROMS, word processing, and so on it is necessary to replace the “dumb” terminals with equipment which is able to do more.
2. Adoption of graphical interfaces:Graphical interfaces for the cataloguing, circulation, serials control and acquisitions modules are now being developed. As a result, technical processing department now can enjoy data entry screens with point and click interfaces, drop-down windows and full screen editing
5
Development Efforts of Development Efforts of Library Automation Vendors in 1997 Library Automation Vendors in 1997 [2]
Pamela Cibbarelli (1997) continues…
3. Embracing the Internet:
Character-based interfaces are easier for the vendors to accomplish: many of us have accessed libraries throughout the world with a simple telnet connection or dialup access. Graphical-based interfaces are a bit tougher for several reasons: the specifications keep changing as Web browser technology
continues to be reinvented at a dazzling pace …
4. Acceptance of new operating systems:
Many microcomputer-based Integrated Online Library Operating Systems packages are migrating to both Windows 95 and Windows NT systems.
6
Timeline of Commercial ERM Developments Timeline of Commercial ERM Developments and Standards: 2000 – 2007 and Standards: 2000 – 2007 [1]
Historical development trend (Murdock, 2010): 2000 – First A to Z list by Serials Solutions
2001 – OpenURL linking emerges
2002 – ERMI Steering Group forms
2003 – COUNTER standards for e-resource statistics
2004 – DLF ERMI published. First ILS integrated ERMS
2005 – Federated searching burgeons
2006 – SUSHI (Standardized Usage Statistics Harvesting Initiatives) by NISO (http://www.niso.org/workrooms/sushi)
2007 – SERU (Shared E-Resource Understanding) (http://www.niso.org/workrooms/seru)
7
Timeline of Commercial ERM Developments Timeline of Commercial ERM Developments and Standards: 2000 – 2007 and Standards: 2000 – 2007 [2]
Murdock (2010) also had the following comments:
There were originally no standards in place to assist in determining staff and workflow issues involved in e-resource management. That changed in 2004 with the publication of the Digital Library Federation’s (DLF’s) Electronic Resource Management Initiative (ERMI), which, among other things, put forth suggested workflow operations for e-resource management in libraries.
In May of 2002, the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and the DLF coordinated the creation of a group intended to guide this project. The resulting report contains a set of standards that serve as a measuring stick for ERM development.
• The above report released in August 2004 summarized in detail some 50 functional requirements of an effective ERM.
8Source: Jewell, T.D., et.al. 2004
Product consideration
Acquisition process
Receipt and physical
processing
Retention, circulation,
preservation
Notification of new product
Overview flowchart for Physical Resource
Acquisition and Management
Licensing negotiation
Implementation processes
Maintenance and review
Technical evaluation
Business negotiation
Product consideration and trial process
Notification of new product
Overview flowchart for Electronic Product Acquisition
and Management
9Source: Jewell, T.D., et.al. 2004
1. A decision to
“proceed” indicates
that the product’s
content has been
evaluated during the
preceding
consideration process
and a serious effort to
acquire the product
should begin.
1
10Source: Jewell, T.D., et.al. 2004
3
2
4
2. Parallel processes may begin during or following a trial period; the trial will assist in answering questions raised during the parallel review processes.
3. A review of whether the product will function without difficulty within the institution’s technical environment.
4. Business issues to be investigated may include: price, archival needs, interface trajectory, vendor quality, branding capability, usage statistics, OpenURL compliance, deep-linking capability, etc.
11Source: Jewell, T.D., et.al. 2004
5
6
5. Possible signing of
license by this point - the
“order/register/formally
sign license” action point
is completed when the
institution has formally
committed to acquiring
the product.
6. The action of notifying
catalogers and service
administrators may occur
at any number of points;
some products are
problematic for service
managers and early
notification is often very
beneficial.
12Source: Jewell, T.D., et.al. 2004
7
8
7. “Routine product
maintenance” may include
the capture of usage
statistics, troubleshooting
and resolving problems,
routine product changes
from the vendor (such as
URL revisions), revisions
to public documentation,
etc.
8. A truncated form of the
review of a new product
that may vary from
product to product and
from institution to
institution.
13
License Record Maintenance (HKUST)License Record Maintenance (HKUST)
14
Resource Advisory Notes Resource Advisory Notes (HKUST)(HKUST) [1]
15
Resource Advisory Notes Resource Advisory Notes (HKUST)(HKUST) [2]
16
Resource Advisory Notes Resource Advisory Notes (HKUST)(HKUST) [3]
Scheduled Maintenance and Technical Problem• Access to [name of e-resource] will not be available on
[date], from 10:00 am to 10:00 pm, due to a scheduled maintenance by the Service Provider. Normal service will resume after the maintenance.
• Users of [name of e-resource] may experience intermittent interruptions in service on [date] as the remote host server is unstable. We have contacted the Service Provider to fix the problem.
• Access to [name of e-resource] will not be available on [date], from 10:00 am to 10:00 pm, due to a system upgrade by the Service Provider. Normal service will resume after the maintenance.
17
Resource Advisory Notes Resource Advisory Notes (HKUST) (HKUST) [4]
Subscription rectification• Access to some [name of e-resource] journals may not
be available due to the change of subscription term. We have contacted the Service Provider to rectify the issue.
• Due to significant price increase, subscription renewal for [name of e-resource] is currently under review. Access is therefore temporarily unavailable.
Breaching• Users may encounter access problems when connecting
to [name of e-resource] due to simultaneous and excessive downloading of data by a/some user(s) at UST. We are working with the Service Provider to remedy the breach of fair usage policy.
18
Site Monitor Site Monitor (HKUST)(HKUST)
Critical Asian Studies (T&F journal, accessed via Informaworld)
Full text available:
• Before 30 March 2010, from year 2001 to current volumes.
• Viewed 30 March 2010, found year 2005 to 2008 only. (Contact Informaworld)
• Viewed 15 April 2010, resumed from year 2001 to current volumes.
Payment history:
• Subscribed P-only from 1997 to 2002
• Subscribed P+E from 2003 to 2009
• Change subscription format from P+E to E-only in 2010
Human-Computer Interaction (T&F journal, accessed via Informaworld)
Full text available:
• Before 30 March 2010, from year 1985 to 2009.
• Viewed 30 March 2010, from year 2008 to 2009 only. (Contact Informaworld)
• Viewed 15 April 2010, found still from year 2008 to 2009 only.
Payment history:
• Subscribed P-only from 1995 – 2002
• Subscribed P+E in 2003
• Subscribed E-only from L. Erlbaum Associates from 2004 to 2007
• Subscribed E-only from T&F from 2008 to 2009
• Cancel subscription with T&F in 2010
19
Invoice Payment (HKUST)Invoice Payment (HKUST)
20
Challenges in ERM DevelopmentChallenges in ERM Development [1]
• Various standards are available for library vendors, subscription agents, and publishers. For Examples:– Standardized usage Statistics Harvesting Initiative (SUSHI)– Online Information Exchange (ONIX)– Serials Online Holdings (SOH)
• The lack of full implementation of existing standards reduces the interoperability and data compatibility between ERM systems and add to management burden for libraries using ERM systems from multiple proprietors.
• Proprietors are challenged to enhance flexibility of their ERM systems to address requirements and ongoing changes needed by libraries.
• Finding the balance between core functionalities of an ERM system and customization to meet needs of individual libraries is another challenge.
21
Challenges in ERM DevelopmentChallenges in ERM Development [2]
22
ConclusionsConclusions
• Commercial ERM systems hold great promises in the management of electronic resources when a library cannot afford a tailor-made electronic resource management system.
• However, these products have different features and each must be evaluated against the library’s current ILS, size and strategic goals in information delivery.
23
References References [1]
Andrews, Mark. (2007) “Changing Markets, Changing Relationships: How Libraries and Vendors Respond to the “Next Generation” Challenge,” Library Hi Tech, Vol 25 No 4, pp. 562-578.
Blake, Kristen, and Stalberg, Erin. (2009) “Me and My Shadow: Observation, Documentation, and Analysis of Serials and Electronic Resources Workflow,” Serials Review, Vol 35 No 4, pp. 242-252.
Blocker, LouAnn. (2006) “Electronic Resource Management Software: A Brief Overview,” Tennessee Libraries, Vol 56 No 2, pp. 1-5.
Breeding, Marshall. (2004) “The Many Facets of Managing Electronic Resources,” Computers in Libraries, Vol 24 No 1, pp 25-28.
Cibbarelli, Pamela R. (1997) “Library Automation Vendors: Today’s Perspective,” The Electronic Library, Vol 15, No 3, pp167-168.
Collins, Maria. (2005) “Electronic Resource Management Systems: Understanding the Players and How to Make the Right Choice for Your Library,” Serials Review, Vol 31, pp. 125-140.
Collins, Maria. (2008) “Electronic Resource Management Systems (ERMS) Review,” Serials Review, Vol 34, pp. 267-299.
Duranceau, Ellen F, and Hepfer, Cindy. (2002) “Staffing for Electronic Resource Management: The Result of a Survey,” Serials Review, Vol 28 No 4, pp. 316-320.
24
References References [2]
Dunham, Barbara S, and Davis, Trisha L. (2009) “Literature of Acquisitions in Review, 2004-7,” Library Resources & Technical Services, Vol 53 No4, pp. 231-242.
Electronic Library Focus Interview with Min-Min Chang, et al. (1997) “Library Automation: A Year On,” The Electronic Library, Vol 15 No 3, pp.196-200.
Fuller, Kate, et al. (2009) “Making Unmediated Access to E-Resources a Reality,” Reference & User Services Quarterly, Vol 48 Issue 3, pp. 287-301.
Jewell, Timothy D, et al. (2004) Electronic Resource Management: Report of the DLF Electronic Resource Management Initiative. Washington, D. C.: Digital Library Federation, available at: http://www.diglib.org/pubs/dlf102/ (accessed 10 April 2010).
Kennedy, Marie R. (2004) “Dreams of Perfect Programs: Managing the Acquisition of Electronic Resources,” Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, Vol 28 No 4, pp. 449-458.
Murdock, Dawn. (2010) “Relevance of Electronic Resource Management Systems to Hiring Practices for Electronic Resources Personnel,” Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, Vol 34, pp. 25-42.
Spodick, Edward F, and Wong, Ming-Kan. (2005) “ERM@HKUST: Improving Staff Workflow and Patron Access,” 6th Hong Kong Innovative Users Group Meeting, 8-9 December 2005, Hong Kong, available at: http://repository.ust.hk/dspace/handle/1783.1/2442.
Top Related