LTE 4G Trial
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The objective of this trial was to evaluate O2’s LTE 4G network in a college environment, by testing a
cross section of the student and staff cohort in Trinity College Dublin. The overall aim was to
determine the capabilities of the 4th generation network in comparison to the participants’ use of
the college wireless network and personal 3G network, ultimately, to record the change in
experiences from both students and staff. O2 have deployed an LTE show case network to
demonstrate LTE services using 10MHz of LTE800 spectrum to both business and consumer
customers in the Dublin region. Coverage was provided in key locations across the greater Dublin
area including Dublin City Centre, IFSC, Docklands and South Dublin.
The trial allowed us to determine changes in speed, data usage and the overall user experience while
using the 4G network in comparison to the student/staff Wi-Fi available in Trinity College.
Although the results of this trial are not exceptionally surprising with regards to the speeds of the 4G
network, they validate the importance placed on network speed and connectivity as well as
reinforcing how a faster network can significantly affect the overall user experience whereby it can
offer a solution of providing the opportunity to be always online. For the student this proves more
significant as staying connected is incremental to their daily routines tapping into social media
constantly and conveniently when they please.
“There is an insecurity of going somewhere without Internet. The worry of going a half an
hour without a Wi-Fi connection, whether checking Facebook or SnapChat is something
students genuinely think about, they want to stay connected at all times”
Staff members too seek an overall ability to stay connected for completely different reasons to the
students. They seek a work/life balance whereby they are not attached to their desk at all times. By
having a network that provides them with the option to always be online allows them to check their
emails on the go. This proved quite significant as throughout the trial, staff members checked their
emails on average 17 times per day compared to students who checked their email just over 4 times
per day.
The usage of applications was also evaluated and divided into different categories, separating uses
of 4G for educational, work and social proposes (e.g. cloud services, social media etc.).
It is clear from the trial result that the participants preferred messaging via internet apps rather than
text messaging. In the most recent Com Reg report, text messaging was down 23.2% while data
increased by 23.9%. Students spent most of their time using social media apps such as Facebook,
Twitter, Instagram as well as WhatsApp and SnapChat as key communication channels. This can be
backed up by the fact that students on average use social media apps four times more than staff
members, whereby they tend to use these apps “consistently throughout the day” even more so
than before as a result of the 4G network speed and convenience of the device. One student
commented on how these factors combined presented him;
“[…] with problem free, constant access to social media apps, as it (the network) was a lot
faster on the tablet provided than both my laptop and iPhone. I used it more as it simply was
just so handy and fast”.
In comparison it is important to note that staff members do not place as much emphasis on social
media and leisure apps, they do not rely on or use as much data as students as they use their data
only when needed, for work and occasionally for news reading etc., there is more importance placed
on using their work or home Wi-Fi for the multiple devices that they may own. This can be also
attributed to the device that was being used for the trial, a Samsung Galaxy Tablet, which was not
ideal for heavy work or academic assignments.
This report delves deeper into these findings with solid results and validates the importance of how
a faster network and constant connectivity can improve the overall user experience.
The trial was administered by Campus.ie on behalf of O2 Ireland and HEAnet with Trinity College
Dublin as the test area. There were 8 base stations located in Dublin City Centre, IFSC, Docklands
and South Dublin. There was full mobility for users within the LTE coverage area across all 8 base
stations.
Trial Details
TIMELINE AND PARTICIPANTS The network trial took place through the months of April and May during which two separate groups
of 5 participants tested out the network capabilities on a tablet device over a 4-week period
respectively.
The trial was run primarily in Trinity College Dublin (TCD) due to the proximity of the testing
environment, but also at residential locations in Drumcondra, Phibsborough and Georges
Dock, along with city centre cafes less than 1km from the college.
The 10 participants were taken from a wide cross section of students and staff members to ensure a
relevant insight was captured. In total, 6 students and 4 staff members were involved in the trial.
Each participant was given the same device in order to allow for a level testing ground, an Android
tablet – Samsung Galaxy Tab 3.
This device was chosen for 3 prime reasons: The Android operating system is the most used
among students.
We wanted participants to use the tablet for both academic/work and social purposes,
which may not be possible with a mobile device.
The device worked with a 4G SIM card.
TRIAL STRUCTURE The structure of the trial involved each participant completing an online feedback survey based
around his or her LTE experiences at least twice per week, during the 4 week trial period.
The criteria of the trial feedback included:
Speed test of 4G network on-campus
Speed test of WIFI on campus Ping speed test ( see Appendix 1 for definition)
Data download/upload speed
Students location when using device
Length of usage per day
Usage and experience with apps
Personal and academic usage
Throughout the trial period a number of informal discussions were carried out with participants to
gain a deep insight into their experiences with the 4G LTE network as well as a final group discussion
with all participants.
We then evaluated and analyzed all data from both the feedback forms and discussions to compile
the following report on our findings.
FEEDBACK Overall the feedback was extremely positive from all participants, both students and staff members.
All participants cited an increase in speed and connectivity in every aspect of their usage compared
to the College Wi-Fi and previous use of the 3G network.
Participants were impressed with the 4G network telling us that wherever coverage was available, it
was“…always fast, and never tapered off to unusual levels of bandwidth,”” allowing for a
continuously positive user experience and confidence in the 4G network that it would not let them
down. This confidence alone and appreciation for the network speed and accessibility was valued
mostly by the students with regards to social and leisure uses, with streaming apps like Spotify and
Netflix where they commented on how with the 4G network these apps “never stopped or stalled
for buffering and downloaded a lot faster than with the Wi-Fi” they had been using. This of course
affected their overall user experience which continued to grow more positive with use.
Important to note, some participants carried out their testing simultaneously. They noted that the
speed significantly slowed down with multiple users in comparison when in the same location. The
4G download and upload speed decreased to a ratio of 3:1 – comparing single usage of the network
to multiple users simultaneously. This in turn affected their opinion of the 4G network; questioning
whether it would provide the same great user experience if multiple users were using
simultaneously.
LOCATIONS Trinity College was chosen as the test college due to its proximity to Dublin City Centre’s 4G test
range as well as having a large, reliable Wi-Fi network to make comparisons with.
The majority of the trial testing took place in Trinity College with students and staff primarily based
here.
The locations included the ISS offices on Pearse Street, Lloyd Building, Hamilton Building, Arts Block,
John Stearne Library, Berkley Library, Chemistry Building, Usher Library, in surrounding coffee shops
on Dame Street and Dawson Street. A full list of locations has been included in the Appendix 2.
A number of the participants lived on Campus in Trinity College as well as NCI’s student
accommodation where they also carried out testing.
Off campus, the network was also tested in George’s Dock and Phibsborough.
CONNECTIVITY Overall connectivity was extremely good; participants noted that once within the network range
they always had instant connectivity to the 4G network.
However, if in a “black spot” where Wi-Fi or phone signal was unavailable, the 4G network too was
unavailable. This was most common in the basement of concrete buildings in Trinity College. To
combat the lack of connectivity many participants would move to an area where they could pick up
coverage, reconnecting and returning with the coverage to their original position. However in the
“black spots” this was not so receptive and they would lose coverage again.
In Georges Dock and Phibsborough the network worked at a slightly slower speed than in Trinity
College, yet still faster than the Wi-Fi at home in Phibsborough and at a similar speed to the Wi-Fi at
work in Georges Dock.
Another participant used the network while travelling to and from Trinity College on the DART. He
found the network to be much faster than any Wi-Fi available, at a constant strength however it
suddenly cut off once out of reach in Clontarf. This participant noted that the signal and connectivity
did not weaken the further away he travelled but simply cut off at the end point of reach.
It was clear and widely reported by the participants that they were always connected when in range.
The following coverage map illustrates the area covered as part of the trial. Areas in pink, show
areas where the O2 LTE trial network was available as part of the trial. The network consisted of 8 x
Ericsson RBS6000 series LTE enabled base stations using 10MHz channels at from the 800MHz Digital
Dividend band.
Target coverage regions for the trial in Dublin:
Dublin City Centre
IFSC
Docklands
South Dublin
Indoor and Outdoor Coverage Map (blue = outdoor, Purple = indoor):
Figure 1 Dublin O2 LTE coverage Map 2014
SPEED Overall it was clear from the feedback that participants were under the impression that the 4G
network was faster than the Wi-Fi being compared on every level. However, when we examined the
results of the speed tests, it became apparent that on average the 4G network did not have an
overall faster speed than the Wi-Fi it was being compared to. On average the 4G network has been
recorded to be faster with regards to download speed only and slower with regards to both the ping
round trip time and upload speed compared to the Wi-Fi in question.
Table 1 lists the average speeds recorded by all participants.
(Lower ping response time = Better Latency Higher download and upload speed = faster speed)
4G RTT Test
WiFi RTT Test
4G Download
Wi-Fi Download
4G Up Wi-Fi Up
40.3 ms 29.63 ms 16.8 Mbps 14.66 Mbps 9.86 Mbps 15.4 Mbps Table 1 Average connectivity speed of all trial participants
The peak speed for a single user was recorded as 49.63Mbps as outlined in Appendix 2.
The results varied slightly when comparing students and staff members, in that students used the
network close to twice as much as staff members with different usage patterns. It remained clear
that the 4G network was faster than the Wi-Fi being compared to with regards to download speed
and slower with regards to the upload speed as well as the ping round trip time. Table 2 below lists
the average time spent using the 4G network per day for both staff and students.
Participant Average time spent using 4G Network per day
Students 2.19 hours
Staff 1.21 hours Table 2 Usage patterns
SIMULTANEOUS SPEED TESTING We also carried out a group speed test with participants comparing the speed of the network during
simultaneous use to the speed of the network with just one user. The result of this experiment
showed a significant decrease in speed for participants using the network simultaneously compared
to the individual user. The average speeds recorded are listed in Table 3
4G Download 4G Up
Individual speed test 38 Mbps 15 Mbps
Average speed test of multiple users (6)
11.7 Mbps 6.7 Mbps
Table 3 Speed Tests
USAGE Overall, on average the entire group used the network 1.5hrs/day. However, the student group used
the network on average 2.19hrs/day as opposed to 1.21hrs/day on average by staff members.
Participants commented on their usage, saying that the device limited their usage of the network at
times as it did not have sufficient software (Office 365 for example) to carry out specific assignments
for both work and academic purposes. One participant commented on how he;
“…tried to open an excel sheet on his tablet” [that it was] “quite hard to use and read but easily
transferred to (his) desktop”.
This comment along with others made it clear that the Samsung Tablet was not ideal for typing or
completing work solely using the network on the device. It did however act as a supplement to
laptops whereby some students and staff members;
“…took notes on their tablet and simply transferred over to [their] laptop by using drop box (or
other sharing services) as it was so fast and convenient to do so with the network speed”.
In comparison for social and leisure or simple web services the device proved a lot more accessible
and convenient while paired with the network.
The usage of the device with the 4G network varied a lot, with a clear segregation and difference
with usage patterns between students and staff.
It was very clear from the feedback that each participants usage certainly increased compared to
previous Wi-Fi use and would have increased even more if they had access to the 4G network on
their personal laptop. When asked if they had increased or decreased overall usage, the answer was
a resounding and definite yes.
The reasons behind this were;
“…due to faster speed and handiness of both the device and network”.
There was a clear increase in usage of social media and entertainment/leisure apps across the board
and particularly with students as mentioned previously. One student commented on how he had;
“…increased [his] usage of all the apps he used on his phone previously as they worked much faster
on the 4G network on the new Samsung tablet, including Spitboard, Spotify, Facebook and Yelp.”
When looking at the two groups, we can say that students primarily used the network for social,
using social/leisure apps on average 4.04 times per day as oppose to staff members who on average
used social/ leisure apps just once per day. Students reported an increase in use of social media sites
such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram as well as streaming sites, both music (Spotify) and movies
(Netflix). It was evident from the feedback that there was an increase in speed while streaming both
music and movies using the 4G network, where “buffering” and “stalling” were no longer an issue.
Some students went as far to say that they would never have streamed movies/TV shows on a
mobile device until their experience with the 4G network due to the previous annoyance of stop
starting and buffering now they would be very happy to.
Students also reported an increase in using the network for academic purposes as the exams
approached. Both students and staff alike commented on how their sharing and downloading of files
(PDFs, PowerPoint presentations etc.) and uploading of files and assignments to Blackboard,
DropBox and other sharing services were instant and extremely convenient for both study and work
using the 4G network staff members’ usage was primarily work-based; as mentioned previously
checking up on emails almost 17 times per day compared to students who checked their email just
over 4 times per day. Many of the staff members synced their calendars and connected to the
internal VPN. They did not use the network heavily for apps but for simple news reading which they
found extremely convenient and accessible with the constant connectivity and speed of the
network.
A number of participants used tethering on the network. They reported an increase in speed from
the Wi-Fi they had previously been using and noted that it was a perfect solution to loss of coverage,
or if the Wi-Fi wasn’t working well. The participants who used the 4G network as a hub spot insisted
that they only used tethering as a last resort. However if 4G were to be their sole form of internet –
replacing Wi-Fi, that tethering would be very important for other devices.
Table 4 below summarizes the average usage patterns of the 4G network from all participants. The
data has been segregated further to show the usage patterns of students compared to staff
members.
Averages per day
All Students Staff All Students Staff
Times p/day
Times p/day
Times p/day
Time spent using the device
1.5hrs 2.19hrs 1.21hrs Rating: 1 – 5
Number of times checked email
8.25 4.17 16.88 Experience 4.07 4.17 3.76
Number of times checked blackboard
0.54 0.69 0.12 Experience 3.21 3.31 2.88
Number of times used sharing services
1.42 1.67 0.71 Experience 3.76 3.97 3.24
Number of times used online software
1.58 1.58 1.47 Experience 3.61 3.75 3.18
Number of times used productivity apps
1.17 1.33 1.94 Experience 3.57 3.69 3.12
Number of times used social/leisure apps
3.37 4.04 1.0 Experience 3.76 4.0 3.0
Number of times used other web services
4.06 2.77 6.41 Experience 3.67 3.67 3.59
Table 4 Summary of results for Staff and students
KEY FINDINGS The key findings from the online results (included in the Appendix 3) show an overall increase in
speed with regards to downloading for the 4G network compared to the college Wi-Fi. However,
they show an overall decrease in response time with regards to the ping round trip time test and
upload speed on the 4G network compared to the Wi- Fi. It is important to note that participants
had not noticed the average increase in either the ping round trip time or the decrease in the upload
speed of the 4G network compared to the ping RTT and upload speed of the Wi-Fi network. They
believed that the 4G network was faster than the Wi-Fi, but on paper it is clear that on average the
4G ping test and upload speed are not as fast as the Wi-Fi being compared.
While the speeds recorded are all very impressive, many of the 4G speeds recorded are similar to
those available on the 3G+ network which in turn is more widely available and affordable than the
4G network. This is significant to note as students in particular may not be able to afford 4G but still
desire the faster speeds and constant connection and accessibility to data that is available on the 4G
network. Students want as much data as possible for as cheap as possible and will switch plans and
sometimes providers accordingly. It is clear from this trial that they rely on data as a means of
communication so much so that data is becoming the common denominator in communication for
them, and is slowly changing the game.
One particularly significant finding was that the speed of the 4G network was affected greatly when
tested with simultaneous users as compared to single usage. It was recorded that a single user on
the network has up to 3 times the speed of a user using the network simultaneously with others.
This probes the question of the capabilities of the network when used in mass and the capacity it
can hold.
Location and connectivity wise, once within range, the 4G network was always instantly connected
and always stronger than the Wi-Fi when compared. It was unanimous in the participant’s
experiences that during the trial period, once in range, they were always connected to the 4G
network.
The network was primarily used for social and leisure reasons, with students including an increase in
usage in Facebook, Spotify and Netflix due to the convenience and speed of the 4G network when
compared to the Wi-Fi in question. It was clear that this was what affected their overall user
experience as allowed for a confidence and appreciation in the network to emerge which was not
near as strong in comparison to the Trinity Wi-Fi or previous use of 3G network.
Staff members used the network primarily for work purposes and explained that the network was
instant and always connected allowing them to access emails and calendar constantly with ease, it
allowed for a work/life balance, enabling more flexibility with no requirement to be stuck at the desk
or within range of strong Wi-Fi to complete work tasks or respond to emails.
CONCLUSION After carefully analyzing the data and recording insights received from all participants in this trial we
can conclude the following:
Once within range, the 4G network is always available and connected, with a faster
download speed than the student/staff Wi-Fi in Trinity College.
The ping round trip time and upload speed of the 4G network are on average slower than
the Wi-Fi in Trinity College.
During this trial, simultaneous use decreased the 4G network speed per user up to 3 fold.
4G coverage is unavailable in “black spots” such as the basement of concrete buildings.
The perception of quality and speed of the network is higher amongst students compared to
staff due to the services and nature of use.
Tethering a laptop to the 4G device is primarily used as a backup if Wi-Fi is not working well.
Using Data to communicate is becoming increasingly more important for students who rely
on social media sites to communicate with one and other instead of the text message
Important to note, some participants carried out their testing simultaneously and noted a
reduced capacity with 3 or more devices in the same room/area
Key questions/ items for consideration;
Would an LTE network scale efficiently up to 9,000 to 10,000 peak concurrent users in Trinity
College?
How long will it take for the rollout of LTE take and will LTE ever have national coverage?
What will become the dominant way to connect student and staff devices to an LTE
network? Will a dedicated SIM per device, MIFI, tethering or all three be used to connect?
Comments on the trial report: Trinity College Network Services comments on context, items for further consideration and potential
bias in findings.
The College Wi-Fi network was designed and built incrementally over the last decade. In addition to
aspects of the design, the majority of the 1,100 Wi-Fi access points and controllers are legacy and
end of life. A project was approved to redesign and replace the Wi-Fi network which will be
complete by the end of next year. The test 4GLTE network is next generation and preproduction
with few users, whereas the Wi-Fi network is an end of life busy production network with thousands
of users.
3/4G and Wi-Fi are complementary technologies rather than directly comparable, particularly in
terms of RF coverage, funding and cost recovery models. In the absence of test controls, testing Wi-
Fi across within a local campus environment is more variable and less repeatable than 4G LTE. Wi-Fi
RF coverage differs also in that weak local coverage is under the control of the campus organization,
should they choose to remediate. Wi-Fi is a local area connectivity and access technology.
3/4G on the other is a wide area connectivity and access technology and has a greater footprint
extending from campus to metropolitan to national and beyond.
High density access connectivity, typically required in University lecture theatres, conference
venues, libraries, and other gathering spaces was excluded from the scope of the trial.
The trial excludes bias and effects of differences of funding and cost recovery models which differ
across the technologies. Wi-Fi is generally funded centrally whereas 3/4G LTE would typically be
funded by the end user with an element of pay-per-use. For the purpose of the trial both
technologies were “free-issue”.
Wi-Fi is a more convenient connectivity and access technology to offer guests and is the only
practical feasible wireless solution in high density free issue scenarios".
Appendix 1
Ping TEST DEFINITION: RTT – round trip time. The ping command was used to determine the round trip time. The ping
speed is the reaction time of your connection–how fast you get a response after you've sent out a
request. A fast ping means a more responsive connection, therefore the lower the response time,
the better. Ping is measured in milliseconds (ms).
The download speed is how fast you can pull data from the server to you. Most connections are
designed to download much faster than they upload, since the majority of online activity, like
loading web pages or streaming videos, consists of downloads. Download speed is measured in
megabits per second (Mbps).
The upload speed is how fast you send data from you to others. Uploading is necessary for sending
big files via email, or in using video-chat to talk to someone else online (since you have to send your
video feed to them). Upload speed is measured in megabits per second (Mbps).
Appendix 2 LOCATIONS
Botany Bay and The Berkeley Library
On-Campus Accommodation
Costa Coffee, Dawson St
Starbucks Dame St, Library
TCD Hamilton
John Stearne Library, SJH
Usher Library
Cabra Park, Phibsborough
Basement, Lloyd Building
TCD College Green
ISS Building 200 Pearse St
Lloyd Building
Front Square TCD
Library, on-campus apartment
Chemistry building
On campus, library, Arts Block
Berkeley Library, Trinity College
Trinity 24 hr library, Hamilton library
Lloyd Building
Georges Dock (HEANet)
Arts Block: 4046
Arts Block
On campus, library, Arts Block
4th Floor Usher Library
Drumcondra Table 5 List of LTE trial locations
Appendix 3
IP Address 4
G
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
M
s
4G
Down- load
Mpts
4G
Upload Speed
Mpts
W
i
F
i
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
M
s
Wi
Fi
Do
wn
-
loa
d
Mp
ts
Wi
Fi
Up
loa
d
Sp
eed
Mp
ts
Where
did
you use
the
device
today?
Ho
w
lon
g
in
tot
al
wo
uld
yo
u
ha
ve
spe
nt
usi
ng
the
de
vic
e
tod
ay?
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
yo
u
em
ail
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
bl
ac
k-
bo
ar
d?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
shari
ng
servi
ces?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
onlin
e
soft
ware
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
man
y
time
s
toda
y
did
you
use
pro-
duct
ivity
apps
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
tim
es
to-
da
y
did
yo
u
use
soc
ial/
lei
sur
e
ap
ps?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
tim
es
tod
ay
did
yo
u
us
e
oth
er
we
b
ser
-
vic
es?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
6
8
134.226.25
4.162
0 0 0 12 5.17 9.92 ISS
Buildi
ng 200
Pearse
St
1 5 1 0 3 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6
7
37.228.216
.13
41 3.29 0.33 128 5.9 0.88 Lloyd
build-
ing
0.5 5 5 1 4 0 3 3 4 0 3 2 5 2 4
6
6
134.226.25
4.162
36 10.5
1
6.35 13 10.5
8
3.09 ISS
Buildi
ng 200
Pearse
St
1 5 5 0 3 1 5 0 3 1 5 0 3 2 5
6
5
213.191.23
6.2
57 8.85 7.58 39 5.59 15.1 TCD
Ham-
ilton
1 6 3 2 4 0 2 1 4 2 2 0 4 1 3
6
4
37.228.216
.13
38 9.59 5.32 15 9.11 4.32 Lloyd
build-
ing
0.5 3 4 0 3 2 5 3 4 0 3 2 4 3 3
6
3
134.226.21
4.249
40 21.4
8
19.64 32.0
7
13.4
8
32.0
7
star
buc
ks
da
me
st,
libr
ary
2 4 4 0 3 6 5 2 3 1 4 0 3 0 3
6
2
213.191.23
6.2
10 14.9
8
9.04 49 9.72 0.5 TCD
Ham-
ilton
1 4 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 5 4 0 2 3 3
6
1
213.191.23
6.2
40 9.24 4.49 8 11.6
6
8.11 Lloyd
build-
ing
0.5 3 3 1 4 2 5 0 3 2 2 0 3 5 5
6
0
213.191.23
6.2
40 21.4
8
19.64 30 13.4
8
32.0
7
costa
coffee
,
dawso
n st
1 2 4 0 3 2 5 1 4 3 4 0 3 0 3
5
9
134.226.25
4.162
38 17.6
4
5.2 13 10.4
9
5.16 my
office
2nd
floor
200
pearse
st
1 5 5 0 3 0 3 1 5 0 3 0 3 1 5
5
8
134.226.21
4.248
13 1.69 5.84 38 13.4
1
8.36
3
TCD
Ham-
ilton
2 8 5 0 1 3 3 2 2 0 1 1 5 2 3
5
7
213.191.23
6.2
66 3.7 0.46 54 1.01 0.53 John
Stearn
e
Librar
y, SJH
3 5 5 6 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 6 5 3 5
5
6
213.191.23
6.2
10 5.49 12.18 120 3.21 0.61 TCD
Ham-
ilton
1 4 4 0 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3
5
5
134.226.21
4.249
53 14.4
1
17.64 13 11.7
5
15.4
5
bota
ny
bay
and
the
berk
eley
libra
ry
4 2 5 0 3 2 4 0 3 2 4 5 5 0 3
5
4
134.226.2
14.254
35 24.2
1
13.1
8
11 14.6
3
29.0
2
on-
camp
us
acco
mmo-
datio
n
2 10 5 1 4 3 4 5 5 2 5 10 5 10 5
3 134.226.2
54.162
45 9.3 13.3
4
12 12.8
6
19.3
4
200
Pearse
Street
office
and
meet-
ing
room
2 50 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 10 4 5 4 20 4
5
2
213.191.2
36.2
0 0 0 12 9.36 12.9
3
basem
ent
lloyd
build-
ing
2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5
1
134.226.2
14.249
38 48.6
2
19.6
1
12 19.6
6
12.9
5
TCD 1 4 4 0 1 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 1 3
Ent
ry#
IP Address 4
G
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
4G
Down- load
4G
Upload Speed
W
i
F
i
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
Wi
Fi
Do
wn
-
loa
d
Wi
Fi
Up
loa
d
Sp
eed
Where
did
you use
the
device
today?
Ho
w
lon
g
in
tot
al
wo
uld
yo
u
ha
ve
spe
nt
usi
ng
the
de
vic
e
tod
ay
?
H
o
w
m
an
y
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
yo
u
e
m
ail
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
H
o
w
m
an
y
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
bl
ac
k-
bo
ar
d?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
shari
ng
serv
ices
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
onlin
e
soft
ware
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
man
y
time
s
toda
y
did
you
use
pro-
duct
ivit
y
app
s?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
to-
da
y
did
yo
u
us
e
so
cia
l/
lei
sur
e
ap
ps
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
tod
ay
di
d
yo
u
us
e
ot
he
r
we
b
ser
-
vic
es
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
50 134.226.2
14.249
36 38.
03
19.9
1
9 15.
56
20.
96
museum building, berkeley library, botany bay
4 4 5 1 4 3 5 1 4 2 4 5 5 1 4
49 134.226.2
14.251
36 17.
29
16.5
4
13 11.
05
8.0
5
library 1.5 2 4 0 3 4 5 2 4 1 4 1 5 0 3
48 89.101.241.130
49 8.08
1.4 21 4.78
1.03
Cabra
Park,
Phibs
bor-
ough
1 1 4 0 3 1 4 0 3 0 3 2 3 0 3
47 213.191.2
36.2
183 7.2
5
0.21 13 10 14.
38 Ll
oy
d
bui
ldi
ng
0.5 5 2 4 1 2 3 3 2 0 3 3 3 0 3
46 176.12.10
7.139
54 1.0
1
0.53 53 1.4
5
0.3
6 F
r
o
n
t
S
q
u
a
r
e
T
C
D
2 3 5 3 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 8 5 3 5
45 134.226.2
54.162
53 2.8
3
0.72 16 15.
3
19.
94 200
Pears
e
Stree
t,
Lloy
d
Buil
ding
3 10 4 0 3 5 3 10 4 10 3 5 4 0 3
44 134.226.2
54.162
40 11.
32
11.4
4
15 9.6
8
16.
66 IS
Servi
ces
200
PS
1 5 4 0 3 1 3 10 4 7 4 3 4 0 3
43 134.226.2
54.162
37 17.
26
2.07 11 20.
05
34.
01 200
Pears
e St
0.5 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 4 1 3 1 4 0 3
42 213.191.2
36.2
39 18.
01
14.2 9 0 19.
38 library, on-campus apt
2 3 4 0 3 7 4 12 3 10 4 3 3 2 3
41 37.228.21
6.13
14 10.
26
8.4 12 8.2
8
11.
78 Che
mistr
y
Buil
ding
0.5 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 4 0 3 3 3 0 3
40 134.226.2
14.252
34 23.
82
15.2
7
13 19.
36
25.
21 on
camp
us,
librar
y, arts
block
2 10 5 0 5 2 4 4 5 1 5 8 5 10 5
39 213.191.2
36.2
35 8.4
6
5.4 54 1.0
1
0.5
3 U
s
s
h
e
r
li
b
r
a
r
y
2 3 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 3 5 0 5
38 134.226.2
54.162
39 18.
29
18.5
7
11 18.
18
26.
39 iss
meeti
ng
room
1 2 5 1 3 2 5 0 3 1 5 0 3 2 5
37 213.191.2
36.2
44 33.
27
20.1 19 13.
84
22.
76 Ber
kel
ey
libr
ary
,
Tri
nit
y
Co
lle
ge
3 3 5 0 3 3 5 1 4 0 3 5 5 1 4
36 134.226.2
14.254
0 0 0 0 0 0 Ber
kel
ey
libr
ary
,
Tri
nit
y
Co
lle
ge
2 3 4 0 3 3 5 2 5 0 3 5 5 1 4
Ent
ry#
IP Address 4
G
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
4G
Down- load
4G
Upload Speed
W
i
F
i
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
Wi
Fi
Do
wn
-
loa
d
Wi
Fi
Up
loa
d
Sp
eed
Where
did
you
use the
device
today?
Ho
w
lon
g
in
tot
al
wo
uld
yo
u
ha
ve
spe
nt
usi
ng
the
de
vic
e
tod
ay
?
H
o
w
m
an
y
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
yo
u
e
m
ail
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
H
o
w
m
an
y
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
bl
ac
k-
bo
ar
d?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
shari
ng
serv
ices
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
onlin
e
soft
ware
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
man
y
time
s
toda
y
did
you
use
pro-
duct
ivit
y
app
s?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
to-
da
y
did
yo
u
us
e
so
cia
l/
lei
sur
e
ap
ps
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
tod
ay
di
d
yo
u
us
e
ot
he
r
we
b
ser
-
vic
es
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
35 89.101.24
1.130
38 11.
17
5.66 177 4.4
3
1 geor
ges
dock
and
cabr
a
park
phib
sbor
o
2 2 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 4 4 3 4
34 134.226.2
54.162
68 21.
88
9.78 10 21.
27
31.
16 200
Pears
e
Stree
t
2 100 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 10 4 5 4 10 4
33 134.226.2
14.254
47 25.
02
17.8
1
12 28.
85
29.
54 Trin
ity
24
hr
libra
ry,
Ha
milt
on
libra
ry
4 6 4 0 3 2 4 4 5 3 5 7 5 2 4
32 213.191.2
36.2
11 9.7
4
35.2
7
38 40.
57
19.
46 TCD
Campu
s
0.5 3 4 0 3 2 5 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
31 89.101.24
1.130
42 11.
07
1.28 43 4.8
2
1.0
8 Cabra
Park,
Phibs
bor-
ough
and
Georg
e’s
dock
1
ho
ur
2 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 2 4 0 3
30 213.191.2
36.2
36 14.
79
3.56 12 22.
14
25.
08 ISS
Buil
d-
ing
200
Pear
se St
1 1 5 0 3 1 5 1 5 0 3 0 3 1 5
29 37.228.21
6.13
44 6.3
1
1.22 10 2.5
8
2.2
6 Ll
oy
d
bu
ild
in
g
0.5 5 4 1 3 2 4 2 5 3 3 1 2 0 3
28 83.71.193
.228
37 20.
97
18.8
7
163 21.
27
33.
25 200
Pears
e
Stree
t
1 60 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 25 4
27 213.191.2
36.2
40 9.8
2
8.3 13 22.
66
24.
84 Mee
ting
roo
m
200
Pear
se
Stre
et
1 20 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 25 4
26 213.191.2
36.2
90 2.4 1.58 54 6.8 0.3
1 Cabra
Park,
Phibs
bor-
ough
and
Georg
e’s
dock
4 3 3 0 3 0 3 1 2 0 3 3 3 5 3
25 134.226.2
14.251
36 49.
43
17.9
5
15 26.
61
33.
94 on-
camp
us
acco
mmo
-
datio
n
2 10 3 2 2 3 3 5 2 2 1 10 1 10 1
24 95.83.253
.242
53 1.4
5
0.36 54 1.0
1
0.5
3 Lab
our
Rel
atio
ns
Co
mm
is-
sion
2 4 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 2 5 8 5 1 5
23 134.226.2
14.251
36 49.
63
17.9
5
15 26.
61
33.
94 on-
camp
us
acco
mmo-
datio
n
3 10 5 0 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 10 5 10 5
Ent
ry#
IP Address 4
G
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
4G
Down- load
4G
Upload Speed
W
i
F
i
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
Wi
Fi
Do
wn
-
loa
d
Wi
Fi
Up
loa
d
Sp
eed
Where
did
you use
the
device
today?
Ho
w
lon
g
in
tot
al
wo
uld
yo
u
ha
ve
spe
nt
usi
ng
the
de
vic
e
tod
ay
?
H
o
w
m
an
y
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
yo
u
e
m
ail
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
H
o
w
m
an
y
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
bl
ac
k-
bo
ar
d?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
shari
ng
serv
ices
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
onlin
e
soft
ware
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
man
y
time
s
toda
y
did
you
use
pro-
duct
ivit
y
app
s?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
to-
da
y
did
yo
u
us
e
so
cia
l/
lei
sur
e
ap
ps
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
tod
ay
di
d
yo
u
us
e
oth
er
we
b
ser
-
vic
es
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
22 89.101.24
1.130
41 10.
84
1.16 42 3.5
2
1.0
4 Cabra
Park,
Phibs
bor-
ough
1 1 5 0 3 0 3 1 4 0 3 3 4 1 4
21 37.228.21
6.13
43 6.6
8
2.59 11 9.0
8
5.7
2 Ll
oy
d
bui
ldi
ng
0.5 5 4 0 3 4 3 2 4 0 3 0 3 5 3
20 37.228.21
6.13
39 28.
79
19.7
5
10 9.3
6
9.5
1
Arts
block
0.5 3 5 0 3 2 5 0 3 2 5 0 3 2 5
19 213.191.2
36.2
37 37.
72
19.0
3
36 42.
69
16.
45
arts
4046
1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3
18 213.191.2
36.2
38 47.
67
20.1
6
11 5.3
1
12.
96
arts
block
3 2 4 1 4 2 4 1 5 2 4 3 5 1 5
17 134.226.2
14.252
44 23.
42
19.5
4
8 28.
1
32.
42 on
camp
us,
librar
y, arts
block
4 10 5 4 5 4 5 2 5 2 5 10 5 10 5
16 134.226.2
54.162
43 32.
3
19.0
1
8 24.
4
34.
13 200
Pearse
Street
office
and
meet-
ing
room
1 20 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 10 4
15 134.226.2
14.252
37 46.
33
19.4
5
37 46.
33
19.
45 botan
y bay
and
the
arts
block
1 2 4 0 3 2 5 3 4 2 5 3 5 2 4
14 213.191.2
36.2
47 5.1
8
0.19 14 44.
55
32.
43
HEAn
et
4 2 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 4 4 2 3
13 213.191.2
36.2
39 35.
52
15.4
8
16 28.
4
35.
52 Mee
ting
roo
m
200
Pear
se
Stre
et
1 20 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 10 3
12 213.191.2
36.2
41 6.7
4
0.4 13 56.
13
43.
3 Geo
rge’
s
doc
k
(he-
anet
)
3 2 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 6 4 1 3
11 213.191.2
36.2
44 10.
54
3.74 30 4.4
8
1.1
3 Cabra
Park,
Phibs
bor-
ough
5 2 5 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 2 5 0 3
10 134.226.2
14.252
37 27.
19
7.98 10 7.7 12.
84 Ber
kel
ey
libr
ary
,
Tri
nit
y
Co
lle
ge
3 5 5 1 4 3 4 1 4 3 5 5 5 2 4
9 213.191.2
36.2
44 21.
18
16.1
3
15 16.
52
21.
41 on
camp
us,
librar
y, arts
block
3 10 5 0 4 1 4 1 5 0 5 10 5 10 5
8 213.191.2
36.2
70 8.4 0.27 32 10.
17
0.9
1 Dru
mcon
- dra
1 20 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 10 4
7 134.226.2
14.249
41 40.
57
12.4
8
13 24.
9
35.
13 on
camp
us,
librar
y, arts
block
2 10 4 1 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 10 5 10 5
Ent
ry#
IP
Address 4
G
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
4G
Down- load
4G
Upload Speed
W
i
F
i
P
i
n
g
t
e
s
t
Wi
Fi
Do
wn
-
loa
d
Wi
Fi
Up
loa
d
Sp
eed
Where
did
you
use
the
device
today?
Ho
w
lon
g
in
tot
al
wo
uld
yo
u
ha
ve
spe
nt
usi
ng
the
de
vic
e
tod
ay?
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
yo
u
e
m
ail
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
H
o
w
m
an
y
ti
m
es
to
da
y
di
d
yo
u
ch
ec
k
bl
ac
k-
bo
ar
d?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
shari
ng
servi
ces?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
How
man
y
time
s to-
day
did
you
use
onlin
e
soft
ware
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
man
y
time
s
toda
y
did
you
use
pro-
duct
ivity
apps
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
to-
da
y
did
yo
u
us
e
so
cia
l/
lei
sur
e
ap
ps
?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
Ho
w
ma
ny
ti
me
s
tod
ay
did
yo
u
us
e
oth
er
we
b
ser
-
vic
es?
Rat
e
Ex-
peri
enc
e 1-
5
6 89.101.2
41.130
0 0 0 81 4.12 1.4
6 Cabra
Park,
Phibs
bor-
ough
5 4 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 5 1 6 1
5 213.191.
236.2
36 21.3
7
15.3
4
14 13.3
3
13.
12 offi
ce
20
0
pea
rse
stre
et
1 10 4 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 10 4
4 213.191.
236.2
61 11.4
4
0.64 35 4.85 1.0
2 Cabra
Park,
Phibs
bor-
ough
7 3 5 0 3 1 5 0 3 1 4 6 4 2 4
3 213.191.236.2
39 30.38
19.79
15 20.23
17.25
botan
y bay
and
the
arts
block
2 5 5 0 3 1 4 2 5 1 5 4 5 1 4
2 213.191.
236.2
8 0 12.9
7
38 19.1
1
16.
46 4t
h
flo
or
Us
sh
er
Li
br
ar
y
4 5 4 3 5 0 5 0 5 2 4 10 5 4 3
40.
30
16.8
0
9.86 29.6
3
14.6
6
15.
40
1.9
5
8.2
5
4.07 0.54 3.21 1.42 3.76 1.58 3.61 1.70 3.57 3.3
7
3.76 4.0
6
3.67
29.6
3
14.6
6
15.
4
Top Related