A quick googling of the term longevity — meaning long life — yields some
interesting results. One article spotlights residents of the Greek island of Ikaria,
one of the so-called “blue zones”— small areas around the world where residents
frequently outlive their life expectancy by more than a decade.1 Another highlights
Texas centenarian Pearl Cantrell, who swears by her daily dose of bacon as a
contributor to her long life. “It’s got to be crispy,” she told a recent interviewer.2 A
third features genius inventor and entrepreneur Ray Kurzweil, who plans to live
forever with the help of 150 pills a day and a supercomputer backup of his brain.3
As interesting — and quirky — as these stories are, seeing them merely as curiosities
may cause us to ignore evidence that increased longevity is already underway and
that we may enjoy surprisingly long lives. In fact, life expectancy in developed
countries like the U.S. has been — and is expected to continue — rising at a rate of
2.5 years per decade: 3 months per year, 6 hours per day.4
Scientists, medical technologists, and statisticians are clear that increased longevity
has already broadly taken root. Life expectancy in developed countries increased
by three decades over the course of the 20th century alone. Children born in 1900,
1950, and 2000 in the U.S. were expected to see 47.3, 68.2, and 77.0 years of age,
respectively.5 Today, without any further improvement in longevity, three-quarters
of newborns will mark their 75th birthdays. More than half of babies born today in
rich nations will live for 100 years.6
However, this is not simply a story about better health care for children; much of
this increase in longevity is the result of a decline in mortality after age 80, which
means that people are living and staying healthy longer.7 Based upon current life
expectancy tables, a 65-year old female has a 50 percent likelihood of living to age
88, a 25 percent likelihood of living to 93, and a 10 percent likelihood of living to
97. A 65-year-old man has a 50 percent likelihood of living to age 86, a 25 percent
likelihood of living to age 91, and a 10 percent likelihood of living to 95.8 Better
elder health care has lengthened lives by allowing earlier diagnoses and better
treatment of illnesses such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. Public health
campaigns against smoking have also aided longevity.9
November 2013
strategic research report
longevity and the future of retirementJohn D. Curry Senior Director, CAPTRUST Marketing
continued inside
WWW.CAPTRUSTADVISORS.COM
If you take it as a given that advances in medicine and technology
are conspiring to give us longer lives, your likely (and legitimate)
next question is: So what?
One result of increasing longevity is a distinctly older America.
The U.S. Census Bureau reports there are more Americans age
65 and older than at any time in U.S. history. Its 2010 report
indicated there were 40.3 million people age 65 and older in
2010, up from 35 million in 2000 and just 3.1 million in 1900.10
That amounts to more than 13 percent of the U.S. population or
more than one in eight Americans. Looking ahead, this number is
projected to increase to 54.8 million in 2020 and 72.1 million by
2030 — representing more than 19 percent of the U.S. population
of retirement age.11
Yet, even today, the idea of retirement is fading — for reasons both
good and bad. Many Americans whose savings were adversely
affected by market turmoil over the past decade are choosing
to retire later.12 Meanwhile, others — facing the prospect of as
many as 30 or 35 years of life post-paycheck — are rethinking the
nature of retirement itself. Regardless of the cause, if we do, in
fact, live longer and stay active well into our 80s and 90s, it begs
the question of how we will spend our time.
The supply and demand for labor are central to this debate.
As a demographic cohort, the baby boom generation (the
81 million Americans born between the years of 1945 and
1964) represents 38 percent of today’s working population
with almost 60 million participating in the workforce.13 As the
boomers begin to retire in the near term — the youngest is
approximately 50 years old — employers may be hard-pressed
to find suitable replacements.
As Figure Two suggests, while boomers can be replaced by
younger workers, generation X may not be sufficient in size — at
“only” 49 million — to sate demand for experienced workers.14
As this imbalance plays out, employers will need to reengineer
their work arrangements to entice their older and more
experienced workers to remain engaged in the workforce.
Several broad possibilities exist:
• Worklonger.
Employers may actively encourage employees to continue career
work on a full-time basis well beyond today’s average retirement
age of 61.15 The prospect of staying active at work while
providing additional years of savings and accrual of Social
25%
38%
32%
5%
Figure Two: United States Total Labor Force Participation by Generation, 2010*
Mature/WWII Generation (age 67+)
Baby Boomers (age 47-66)
Generation X (age 32-46)
Generation Y/Millennials (age 12-31)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Household Data, Not Seasonally Adjusted: Table A-13: Employment Status of the Civilian
Noninstitutional Population by Age, Sex, and Race” (2012)
continued from cover
Security benefits may be appealing to many. Some may consider
this option for access to affordable health insurance alone.
• Flexibleworkarrangements.
Fearful of losing their most experienced workers and knowledge
base, employers may opt to allow part-time work for employees
into their late 60s and early 70s.16 This phased retirement
approach will allow these employees to continue working on a
basis that helps them maintain social and economic connectivity
to their workplace with enough free time to enjoy more
traditional retirement pursuits.
3
continued on back
Competition for skilled workers will heat up as some employers
provide flexible arrangements and embrace retirement-age
employees, while others lag behind the trend. However, many
retirement-age workers may choose to embark upon a path
entirely different from their chosen career. Options for
recareering are numerous and include everything from working
at (or starting) a not-for-profit to incubating a new business
to returning to school to build an entirely new set of skills
and knowledge.
The impact of our aging population on Social Security and
Medicare, our so-called social safety net, is already front and
center in the current U.S. budget debate. A vast number of
Americans depend on these programs as their primary means of
support in retirement. That number will grow significantly in the
future, simply as a function of the number of Americans reaching
the ages at which they are eligible to receive benefits. Pundits
estimate the long-term deficits of Social Security and Medicare
at $9.6 and $34 trillion, respectively, over the next 75 years —
unless action is taken to improve their economics.17, 18
Potential fixes for these programs include cutting benefits, means
testing, upping eligibility ages, and increasing contribution rates.
More than likely, the resolution will be some combination of
all of the above. Any resolution will put increased pressure on
individuals to take action to plan, save, and invest for their own
retirements, either through employer-sponsored retirement plans,
personal savings, or a combination of both.
Whileitishardtoimaginenotfindingasolutionfor
futuregenerations,individualsorfamilieswouldbe
wisetodothefollowing:
• Saveasifyouplantolivealongtime.
Rather than leaning on backward-looking benchmarks like the
average retirement age or life expectancy, chart your own path.
Plan to retire when and how it makes sense for you, and don’t
underestimate longevity. Anticipate a retirement that could
last 25 or 30 years — just to be on the safe side — and make
sure you understand the amount of savings necessary to sustain
your lifestyle.
• Investforthelonghaul.
While many early- and near-retirees seek refuge from market
volatility in a more conservative investment portfolio, they may
inadvertently expose themselves to a different set of risks.
Notably, they may expose themselves to the risk of running
out of money (also known as longevity risk) and the risk that
inflation — especially healthcare inflation — erodes their
purchasing power.
Figure One: Number of Persons 65 and Over 1900–2030 (numbers in millions)
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging, “A Profile of Older Americans: 2011”, 2011.
3.1
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
4.99
16.6
25.531.2
3540.3
54.8
72.1
WWW.CAPTRUSTADVISORS.COM
All Publication Rights Reserved. None of the
material in this publication may be reproduced in
any form without the express written permission
of CAPTRUST: 919.870.6822.
©2013 CAPTRUST Financial Advisors
The opinions expressed in this report are subject to change without notice. This material
has been prepared or is distributed solely for informational purposes and is not a solicitation
or an offer to buy any security or instrument or to participate in any trading strategy.
The information and statistics in this report are from sources believed to be reliable but
are not warranted by CAPTRUST Financial Advisors to be accurate or complete.
CAPTRUST Financial Advisors does not render legal, tax, or accounting advice.
AboUT CAPTrUST DeS moiNeS
CAPTRUST’s Des Moines office was created through the acquisition of the institutional retirement practice of Holmes Murphy & Associates in December 2010. The office is comprised of a specialty team of institutional retirement advisors with over 60 years of combined industry experience. Our institutional advisors are experts in defined contribution plans—such as 401(k), 403(b), and profit sharing plans—defined benefit plans, and nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Our core institutional services include fiduciary and investment management, participant education and advice, provider due diligence, and vendor
management. All services are provided with clear, unbiased advice by our experienced fiduciary partners.
The Des Moines team also offers private wealth services for executives and senior leaders of our institutional clients and affluent investors. With a focus on comprehensive financial planning, we embrace a holistic approach to addressing our clients’ wealth management needs. Leveraging our institutional quality investment research, our services are designed to help you confidently grow and protect your financial assets.
WeST DeS MOiNeS, iA 4401 Westown Pkwy Suite 220 West Des Moines, IA 50266 Phone: 515.657.4100
HeADqUARTeRS 4208 Six Forks Road Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC 27609 800.216.0645 toll free 919.870.8891 fax
JiM PieRCe Senior Vice President
Financial Advisor Institutional
JeAN DUFFy Senior Vice President
Financial Advisor Institutional
ANDReW SHiMP Vice President
Financial Advisor Institutional
AARON MORRiS Vice President
Financial Advisor Private Wealth
The prospect of living a long, healthy, and happy life presents an
exciting opportunity. While Pearl Cantrell may credit her long and
productive life to her three-piece-a-day bacon habit, for most it
will not be that simple. Given the likelihood of longer lives and
the probability of Social Security and Medicare rollbacks in the
future, individuals will bear a larger burden for their retirement and
healthcare funding. Financing an extra five or 10 years in retirement
will challenge many retirement-age individuals; however, delayed
or phased retirement and recareering may be attractive options for
those interested in continuing to work — albeit on more friendly
terms. For most, it will take thought, planning, and discipline to
build a successful retirement.
Wewelcometheopportunitytospeakwithyoumoreabout
longevityanditsimpactonyourretirementplan.
continued from inside Sources:1 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/magazine/the-island-where-people-forget-to-die.html2 http://www.today.com/food/its-got-be-crispy-woman-105-says-bacon-key-longevity-1C98460503 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324504704578412581386515510.html4 http://www.demogr.mpg.de/en/laboratories/survival_and_longevity_12/5 http://www.census.gov/statab/hist/HS-16.pdf, “No. HS-16. Expectation of Life at Birth by Race and Sex: 1900 to 2001”6 http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aGCHVoAxPlu87 http://www.demogr.mpg.de/en/laboratories/survival_and_longevity_12/8 Institution Retirement Income Council, “The Problem with Living Too Long”, Volume 2, Number 6, 20109 http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aGCHVoAxPlu810 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Administration on Aging, A Profile of Older Americans: 2011”, 201111 Ibid.12 http://www.gallup.com/poll/162560/average-retirement-age.aspx13 Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Household Data, Not Seasonally Adjusted: Table A-13: Employment Status of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population by Age, Sex, and Race”, 201214 Ibid.15 http://www.gallup.com/poll/162560/average-retirement-age.aspx16 http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aGCHVoAxPlu817 http://cnsnews.com/news/article/social-security-faces-96t-unfunded-liabilities-83894-household18 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323393804578555461959256572.html
Top Related