Lessons from California and Perspectives from other Australian States: Reflections on major water reform themes Rebecca Nelson Non-Resident Fellow, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment Specialist Water Lawyer, Kellehers Australia
April 8, 2015
Major water reform themes
Full implementation of this Agreement will result in a nationally-compatible, market, regulatory and planning based system of managing surface and groundwater resources for rural and urban use that optimises economic, social and environmental outcomes by achieving the following: … ii) transparent, statutory-based water planning; iii) statutory provision for environmental and other public benefit outcomes
2
Major water reform themes
Full implementation of this Agreement will result in a nationally-compatible, market, regulatory and planning based system of managing surface and groundwater resources for rural and urban use that optimises economic, social and environmental outcomes by achieving the following: … ii) transparent, statutory-based water planning; iii) statutory provision for environmental and other public benefit outcomes
3
Reflecting on these themes, and lessons here and overseas, where
do our major challenges lie?
Mechanics of implementation Comprehensive implementation Going beyond our comfort zone
Background
4
Allocation and works decisions
State-level (statutory)
water plans
Supra-state law Australian
water law (generalised, simplified)
How much water can be withdrawn?
How much water can I
withdraw, and where?
Envtl water
Envtl water
Envtl water
5
Allocation and works decisions
Water plans
Supra-state law Western US
water law (generalised, simplified)
How much water can be withdrawn?
How much water can I
withdraw, and where?
Envtl water
6
A new view from California • History
– State GW reg’n, well locations, metering, rights info
– Voluntary, collaborative plans – Focus on monitoring, “physical solutions” – Consumptive focus – Stringent financial controls; state grants
• Sustainable GW Management Act (2014): “local GW sustainability plans” – No “undesirable results” over 50 yrs – Voluntary tools, works, regulation, fees – Stakeholders, incl. SW users, GDEs
7
Water planning
8
Challenges in moving beyond planning • Focus on licensing individual extractions • Water right information transparency • Innovations in “physical solutions”
Challenge: Focus on licensing individual extractions • Tick-the-box risk • Groundwater context
– Pumping impacts can be very localised
– Areas of less intensive use may lack (detailed) plans
– Plans often operationalised through licensing
Need for greater academic and (in some cases) agency and practitioner focus
9
Challenge: Water right information transparency
• Aust: aggregate accounts, state registers (HEW registers)
vs US: often full individual water rights info
• Significance for trading, compliance, policy assessments
• But: personal and confidential information
10
• Current and past owners
• Precise point of diversion
• Reliability • Use • Conditions • Dates • Protests • Transfers • Correspondence • Denied/inactive rights • [Well construction
data] • [Use reports]
11
Challenge: Physical solutions
12
• Basin Plan: binding cap + rules (+ water recovery, efficiency measures)
• Western US water mgmt: physical tools highly developed – System re-operation – Efficiency measures – Permanent easements
or temp rotating fallowing
– MAR for envtl/ “retiming” outcomes
Tamarack Project, South Platte, CO
Gragnani wetlands, SJ Valley, CA
Providing environmental water
Key challenges • Groundwater context • Water law mechanics • Urban water sustainability
13
Challenge: Groundwater context • Wide range of GDEs • NWI: consider GW-SW links; GDEs • Narrow view of GDEs
– Fed Water Act vs Basin Plan – High threshold for recognising
connectivity • Narrow range of mechanisms
– Aust: Simple cap/no-go zone vs western US: more complex offsets, easements, MAR
• Challenges re data, awareness, timing
14
Challenge: Water law mechanics
• Environmental water and traditional water law mechanics – Participating in markets – Dealing with costs
• High flows – Access to floodplain land in light of
current and future development – Spill rules
15
Challenge: Urban water sustainability
• Little guidance re sustainability objectives (eg ss93-94 Water Act 1989 (Vic)) – “have regard to sustainable mgmt
principles” – “must act as efficiently as possible
consistent with commercial practice” • Alternative water (stormwater,
wastewater) – Rarely defined targets, priorities,
methodologies, transparent reporting – Cost per unit yield can be high – Politics can influence options – Complex institutional relationships, roles
16
Take-aways
• Water reform work in Australia is not done • Strong basic framework • Now time to focus on:
– Mechanics of implementation – Comprehensiveness of implementation – Going beyond our comfort zone
• Looking abroad can inspire
17
Key references • Rebecca Nelson, “Groundwater, Rivers and Ecosystems: Comparative Insights into Law and
Policy for Making the Links” (June 2013) Australian Environment Review pp. 558-566. • Rebecca Nelson and Meg Casey, “Taking Policy from Paper to the Pump: Lessons on Effective
and Flexible Groundwater Policy and Management from the Western U.S. and Australia” (Water in the West Working Paper, September 2013).
• Erin O’Donnell and Rebecca Nelson, “Mainstreaming Environmental Water Law and Practice” (Centre for Resources, Energy and Environmental Law, Melbourne Law School, October 2013).
• Rebecca Nelson, “Assessing Local Planning to Control Groundwater Depletion: California as a Microcosm of Global Issues” (2012) 48(1) Water Resources Research W01502.
• Rebecca Nelson, “Uncommon Innovation: Developments in Groundwater Management Planning in California” (March 2011) Water in the West Working Paper 1, Stanford University.
• Understanding California’s Groundwater online resource: http://waterinthewest.stanford.edu/groundwater/overview/
Contact: [email protected]
18
Top Related