8 4 0 S O U T H C A N A L S T R E E T
C H I C A G O, I L D A T A C E N T E R A N D T R A D I N G E N V I R O N M E N T
Chad Freese312 935 [email protected]
Aaron Kulick 312 416 [email protected]
L E A S I N G C O N T A C T S :
O V E R V I E W Building Overview 3
Building Attributes/Specs 4
A E R I A L S Downtown Chicago Data Centers and Strategic Assets 5
Area Amenities 6
B U I L D I N G C O N N E C T I V I T Y Fiber Providers 7
Downtown Chicago Data Centers and Exchange Latency 8
Chicago Tunnel / Conduit Depiction 9
Competitive Latency Summary 10
Building and Carrier Connectivity Options 11
Chicago to Aurora Latency 12
F L O O R C A P A C I T I E S & P L A N S First Floor Lobby 13
First Floor Lobby Design 14
Typical Data Center Floor - Multi Tenant Alternative 15
Typical Data Center Floor - Single Tenant Alternative 16
First Floor Receiving and Storage 17
Typical Data Center Floor Cooridors 18
Trading Space 19
C H I C A G O A S A D A T A C E N T E R M A R K E T 20
P R O J E C T T E A M O V E R V I E W 21
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
PAGE 3
+ Full Redevelopment in 2011
+ 443,446 Square Feet (Gross Building) on 5.2 acres
+ Eight Story Building (Including Lower Level)
+ 15 Carriers Accessible (AT&T, Verizon, AboveNet, 360 Networks, Cogent, CFN, Fiberlink, Level 3/Looking Glass, CenturyLink/Qwest, Zayo,
XO, Synesys, Intellifiber, Global Crossing, Paetec)
+ 40MW of Total Electrical Service to Building (12MW Currently in Place)
+ 2-6MW Existing Electrical Utility Services from Medical Center & Jefferson Substations (1-6MW Existing Electrical Utility Maintenance Feed)
+ 4 Additional 6MW Feeds from Taylor Street Substation Being Installed
+ Taylor Street Feeds will come from Newly Constructed Ring Bus (Fed by Separate Substations)
+ 250 lbs per Square Foot Floor Loading
+ Generator Enclosure Housing 20 2MW Generators
+ 134,000 Square Feet of Raised Floor Data Center
+ Highly-Flexible Design - 4 6,000 - 7,500 SF Suites per
Floor (1,000kW Critical Load Each)
+ 20 MW Data Center Critical Load
+ Projected PUE Lower Than 1.4
O V E R V I E W
I N V E S T O R / D E V E L O P E R
Additional information can be found at
www.redseagroup.com
Red Sea Group is one of the most preeminent developers in the world with a multi-billion dollar portfolio includ-ing hotels, residential towers, retail developments, office buildings, data centers, and luxury yachts. As a privately held investment company, Red Sea Group is unique in that its decision making is highly centralized and efficient. Its managing principals are heavily involved in all aspects of their projects from the design and conceptualization through execution and ongoing operation. Red Sea Group is routinely recognized by its global peers with awards and acknowledgement for the quality, efficiency and excellence by which it designs, builds and operates is assets. Red Sea Group, through its creation of Server Farm Realty, has entered the highly capital intensive and design cen-tric business of data center development. This was a natural extension of the Red Sea Group’s ability to leverage their financial strength, design and development competency in a market space where significant barriers to entry exist and supply is limited. To date they have owned and operated ten data centers consisting of over 1.3 MSF which are 100% leased. Server Farm Realty has three projects currently under development which represent 160 MW of capacity.
PAGE 4
B U I L D I N G AT T R I B U T E S / S P E C S
+ Two Floors of Trading Space (Approximately 110,000 RSF) – Floors 6 and 7
+ Large Floor Plates (with Raised Floor)
+ 6,000 SF Atrium with 40’+ Clear Height
+ 30 Watts per Square Foot of Attainable Power
+ Redundant UPS and Generator Systems
+ Dedicated Chilled Water System (N+1 Configuration)
+ Extremely Low Latency Fiber Connectivity to 350 East Cermak
(Estimated .5 millisecond Round-Trip) and Downtown Trading District
+ Data Centers Located on Floors Below
+ 7 X 24 Building Operations for Global Market Trading
+ On-Site Parking
+ Dedicated Trading Entrance
+ Full Amenity Base for Trading
T R A D I N G S P A C E
D A T A C E N T E R A T T R I B U T E S
+ Tier III Design Standards
+ 4 MW Critical Load on Each Floor (Floors 1-5)
+ 130-160 Watts per Raised Floor SF
+ N+1 Concurrently Maintainable Electrical Infrastructure
(2N Option Available)
+ N+2 Central Chiller Plant with Multiple Path Piping (4,500 Tons)
+ Fault Tolerant Room and Fire Suppression Separation for Each
Electrical Lineup
+ 250 lbs per Square Foot Floor Loading
+ Exterior Enclosed Generators
+ Multiple Medium Voltage Risers to Every Floor
+ 2 Carrier Neutral Meet Me Rooms and Dual Fiber Entrances
+ VESDA Smoke Detection
+ Fire Suppression (“Mist System”)
+ State of the Art Security System
+ Sister Server Farm Property - (Moses Lake, WA)
+ Connected via Dedicated Fiber to 840 S. Canal
(42 millisecond Round-Trip Latency)
+ Low Cost Clean Electricity
+ 100MW Capacity
PAGE 5
D O W N T O W N C H I C A G O D A T A C E N T E R S A N D S T R A T E G I C A S S E T S
S I T E A E R I A L S
PAGE 6
S I T E A E R I A L SA R E A A M E N I T I E S
PAGE 7
1 5 F I B E R P R O V I D E R S
B U I L D I N G C O N N E C T I V I T Y
Arthington StreetArthington StreetArthington StreetArthington StreetArthington StreetArthington StreetArthington StreetArthington StreetArthington Street
Taylor StreetTaylor StreetTaylor StreetTaylor StreetTaylor StreetTaylor StreetTaylor StreetTaylor StreetTaylor Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Ca
na
l Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Clin
ton
Street
Cabrini StreetCabrini StreetCabrini StreetCabrini StreetCabrini StreetCabrini StreetCabrini StreetCabrini StreetCabrini Street
Polk StreetPolk StreetPolk StreetPolk StreetPolk StreetPolk StreetPolk StreetPolk StreetPolk Street
840 S Canal840 S Canal840 S Canal840 S Canal840 S Canal840 S Canal840 S Canal840 S Canal840 S Canal
PAGE 8
B U I L D I N G C O N N E C T I V I T Y
This does not represent any ISP latency – purely OSP route standards
4.2 KM / .017 m
s
350 E Cermak
141 W JacksonCME/CBOT
D O W N T O W N C H I C A G O D A T A C E N T E R S A N D E X C H A N G E L A T E N C Y
01
23
4
840 South Canal
350 East Cermak
Kilometers
E X I S T I N G F I B E R R O U T E S T O C M E / C B O T A T 1 4 1 W E S T J A C K S O N
- Existing Tier I carrier routes as of June, 2011
- Latency numbers are in milliseconds and estimated based on one-way transmission on a direct basis to points of presence at the man-hole level outside the building. These do not include any degradation for gear, cross connects or route slack.
PAGE 9
B U I L D I N G C O N N E C T I V I T YCHICAGO TUNNEL / CONDUIT DEPICTION
PAGE 10
B U I L D I N G C O N N E C T I V I T YCOMPETITVE LATENCY SUMMARY840 South Canal vs. 350 East Cermak
- Numbers reflected above are round-trip ping latencies from a Tier I carrier inside the respective buildings inclusive of the network gear, route slack, and cross-connections.
- Domestic latency numbers are in micro “micros” seconds and International latency numbers are in milliseconds “ms”.
PAGE 11
The diagram above shows in 3D how the building and the carriers have robust and diverse connectivity options available for any carrier who occupies both the street level on the west side of 840 (Clinton) and the Tunnel system on the East Side (Canal).
Additionally this diagram introduces the simplicity of the inside plant design (ISP)and the elimination of Passive an Active Meet Me rooms. This design allows for carriers and tenants to negotiate and design fiber to the cabinet or floor which will reduce Inside Plant Latency by an estimated minimum of 1.5 milliseconds.
B U I L D I N G C O N N E C T I V I T YBUILDING AND CARRIER CONNECTIVITY OPTIONS
PAGE 12
B U I L D I N G C O N N E C T I V I T Y
This does not represent any ISP latency – purely OSP route standards
350 E CERMAKAURORA CME
I-88/290
C H I C A G O T O A U R O R A L A T E N C Y
6062
6466
68
840 South Canal
350 East Cermak
Kilometers
E X I S T I N G F I B E R R O U T E S T O C M E A U R O R A
- Existing Tier I carrier routes as of June, 2011
- Latency numbers are in milliseconds and estimated based on one-way transmission on a direct basis to points of presence at the man-hole level outside the building. These do not include any degradation for gear, cross connects or route slack.
PAGE 13
F LO O R C A PA C I T I E S A N D P L A N SM A I N E N T R Y
March 1, 2011Lobby and adjacent spaces
PAGE 14
F LO O R C A PA C I T I E S A N D P L A N SF I R S T F L O O R L O B B Y D E S I G N
March 1, 2011Lobby Rendering
March 1, 2011Lobby Rendering
PAGE 15
F LO O R C A PA C I T I E S A N D P L A N ST Y P I C A L D A T A C E N T E R F L O O R - M U L T I - T E N A N T A L T E R N A T I V E
( A V A I L A B L E O N F L O O R S 1 - 5 )
Suite Critical Power Raised Floor SF ~ Watts/SF Rack Count kW/Rack
1A 1,000kW 6,100 160 199 5.0
1B 1,000kW 7,500 130 248 4.0
2A 1,000kW 6,100 160 203 4.9
2B 1,000kW 7,100 140 239 4.2
O V E R V I E W
PAGE 16
F LO O R C A PA C I T I E S A N D P L A N ST Y P I C A L D A T A C E N T E R F L O O R - S I N G L E T E N A N T A L T E R N A T I V E
( A V A I L A B L E O N F L O O R S 1 - 5 )
Critical Power Raised Floor SF Watts/SF Rack Count kW/Rack
4MW 28,600 140 997 4.0O V E R V I E W
PAGE 17
June 9, 2011FIRST FLOOR PLAN
F LO O R C A PA C I T I E S A N D P L A N SFIRST FLOORReceiving and Storage Areas
Mantrap
Mantrap
Secure Driver Restroom
Tenant Storage
Freight Access Door
PAGE 18
F LO O R C A PA C I T I E S A N D P L A N ST Y P I C A L D A T A C E N T E R F L O O R C O R R I D O R S
March 1, 2011Fifth Floor - Rendering
March 1, 2011Fifth Floor - Rendering
PAGE 19
F LO O R C A PA C I T I E S A N D P L A N S
S I X T H F L O O R
S E V E N T H F L O O R
T R A D I N G F L O O R S
Floor Size (RSF) Critical Power Approximate Power Density
Sixth 60,924 1.32MW 30 Watts/SF
Seventh 54,404 1.18MW 30 Watts/SF
O V E R V I E W
Atrium
Atrium
PAGE 20
CHICAGO AS A DATA CENTER MARKET
AV E R AG E R E TA I L P R I C E O F E L E C T R I C I T Y TO U LT I M AT E C O N S U M E R S
Source: US Energy Administration
Average Retail Price of Electricity to Ul3mate Customers by State(Commercial Rates, Table 5.6.B, March 2010)
State Cents/kW HourWashington 7.3Illinois 7.99Colorado 8.49Arizona 8.6Georgia 9.06Texas 9.63Pennsylvania 10.01California 12.27New Jersey 13.48District of Columbia 13.53New York 15.09
Source: U.S. Energy Informa3on Administra3on
0 2 4 6 8 10
12 14
16
Washington
Illinois
Colorado
Arizona
Georgia
Texas
Pennsylvania
California
New Jersey
District of Columbia
New York
Average Retail Price of Electricty to Ul<mate Consumers
Natural Disaster Risk Ranking for Major Data Center Markets
City RankingPhoenix 1Philadelphia 2Chicago 3Denver 4Atlanta 5Dallas 6Washington DC 7New York 8SeaIle 9Los Angeles 10Houston 10San Jose 12
Source: SustainLane 2008 US City Sustainability Rankings
0 2
4 6
8 10
12
Phoenix
Philadelphia
Chicago
Denver
Atlanta
Dallas
Washington DC
New York
Seattle
Los Angeles
Houston
San Jose
Natural Disaster Risk Ranking for Major Data Center Markets N AT U R A L D I S A S T E R R I S K R A N K I N G F O R M A J O R DATA C E N T E R M A R K E T S
Source: SustainLane 2008 US City Sustainabilty Rankings
+ 28 Fortune 500 HQs
+ 60+ Fortune 1000 HQs
+ 12 Financial Times Global 500 HQs
+ 10 Fortune Global 500 HQs
+ 400+ Major Corporate Headquarters
+ Global Leader in Options, Futures and Derivatives Trading
+ Unrivaled Accessibility via Air, Rail and Interstate Travel
Source: World Business Chicago
S U S TA I N A B I L I T Y R A N K I N G S F O R M A-J O R DATA C E N T E R M A R K E T S
Source: SustainLane 2008 US City Sustainability Rankings
Seattle
Chicago
New York
Minneapolis
Philadelphia
Denver
Washington DC
Atlanta
San Jose
Dallas
Los Angeles
Phoenix
Houston
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
©2011 CB Richard Ellis, Inc. The information above has been obtained from sources believed reliable. We have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and do not represent the current or future performance of the property. You and your advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property to determine to your satisfaction the suitability of the property for your needs.
www.cbre.com
Red sea gRoup/seRveR FaRm Realty
comdesco gRoup
sheehan paRtneRs
Owner
Construction Management
Fiber Consultants and Network Engineering
Data Center Architects
Data Center Engineerwww.nova-corp.com
cBRe
Market Advisor andLeasing Agents
nova constRuction esd
www.redseagroup.comwww.serverfarmrealty.com
www.esdesign.com www.sp-arch.com www.comdesco.com
P R O J E C T T E A M
Top Related