8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
1/37
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
LAWCOMMISSION
OFINDIA
Court-fees in Supreme Court vis-à-vis Corporate Litigation
Report No !"#
De$em%er& !'('
(
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
2/37
LatestLaws.com
Court-fees in Supreme Court vis-à-vis Corporate Litigation
TA)LE OF CONTENTS
*age
No
I REFERENCE (-"
II EARLIER RE*ORTS +-#
III E,AMINATION OF ISSE FROM T.E /-("CONSTITTIONAL ANGLE 0ARTICLE (+1
IV CERTAIN DETAILS RELATING TO (+-(/COR*ORATE LITIGATION
V *OSITION IN FOREIGN CONTRIES (2
VI EASIER ACCESS TO CORTS AND (3-!+CORT-FEE
VII SMMAR4 AND RECOMMENDATIONS !5-!3
A**ENDI, "'-"(
!
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
3/37
LatestLaws.com
Justice P. V. Reddi Ne6 De78i0Former 9u:ge& Supreme Court of In:ia1 Te7e; !"'( 3+#5 0R1C8airman !""2 ++/5 0O1La6 Commission of In:ia Fa&
Sub: Court-fees in Supreme Court vis-à-vis Corporate Litigation.
I am for6ar:ing 8ere6it8 t8e !"#
t8
Report of t8e La6Commission of In:ia on t8e a%o?e su%@e$t
*ursuant to t8e o%ser?ations ma:e %> t8e Department -Re7ate: *ar7iamentar> Stan:ing Committee on *ersonne7& *u%7i$Grie?an$es& La6 an: 9usti$e in its !2t8 Report on t8e Supreme Court0Num%er of 9u:ges1 Amen:ment )i77& !''2& t8e Department of 9usti$e reueste: t8e La6 Commission of In:ia to $onsi:er 7e?>ing8ig8er $ourt-fees on t8e $orporate se$tor It 6as fe7t t8at in spite of
8ig8 staBes in?o7?e: an: t8e 7ong time taBen %> t8e $ourt in:isposing of $ases fi7e: %> t8e $ompanies& ?er> 7itt7e $ourt-fee isrea7ie: from t8em T8erefore& t8e *ar7iamentar> Stan:ingCommittee suggeste: amen:ment of Supreme Court Ru7es frame:un:er Arti$7e (+5& for 7e?>ing ad valorem $ourt- fees on $orporate7itigants
Offi$e; I L I )ui7:ing& )8ag6an:as Roa:& Ne6 De78i ((' ''(Resi:en$e; (& 9anpat8& Ne6 De78i ((' '((
E-mai7; p?re::i>a8oo$oin
"
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
4/37
LatestLaws.com
As t8e o%ser?ations of t8e *ar7iamentar> Stan:ing Committee 6ere
spe$ia77> 6it8 referen$e to t8e $orporate 7itigation in t8e Supreme Court& 6e
8a?e e t8at issue in :etai7 It ma> %e mentione: t8at t8e
*ar7iament is $ompetent to 7e?> $ourt-fee on7> in respe$t of 7itigation in t8e
Supreme Court an: nion TerritoriesT8e Commission 8as taBen t8e ?ie6 t8at it 6ou7: not %e 7ega77>
permissi%7e nor pra$ti$a%7e to 7e?> 8ig8er $ourt-fee on7> on t8e$ompanies = $orporates T8e so7ution offere: %> t8e Commission isto in$rease ad valorem $ourt-fee pa>a%7e in respe$t of t8e appea7s0Ci?i71 to t8e Supreme Court su%@e$t to a ma& t8e ma t8e Companies& Firms& Trusts an: AO*s un:er spe$ia7 A$ts et$6ou7: attra$t 8ig8er fee T8e Commission 8as a7so suggeste:up6ar: re?ision of minimum fee of Rs !5'=- as 6e77 as t8e fi fi pai: on ad valorem %asis %ot8 at t8e tria7an: appe77ate stage Fina77>& t8e Commission 8as suggeste: t8atinstea: of *ar7iament ena$ting an> 7egis7ation straig8t6a>superse:ing t8e ru7es frame: %> t8e Supreme Court& it 6ou7: %e
proper to a::ress t8e Supreme Court for re?ision of $ourt-fees as it8as remaine: stati$ for near7> #' >ears %> no6 T8e Supreme Courtma> t8en $onstitute a Committee an: go into t8e uestion of
re?isionIt 8as %een ma:e $7ear in t8e Report t8at t8e Court-fee s8ou7: not %e ?ie6e: as $8ief sour$e of re?enue to run t8e $ourts an: furt8er in t8e $ase of ad valorem $ourt-fee& t8e
prin$ip7e of pres$ri%ing a $ei7ing 7imit s8ou7: %e a:8ere: to T8e Commission 8asa7so emp8asie: t8at t8e agen:a of e
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
5/37
LatestLaws.com
a$$ess to t8e Court 8as to %e a$$omp7is8e: 6it8out 7inBing it up6it8 t8e uantum of $ourt fee T8e 7ega7 ai: me$8anisms in for$ein t8e Supreme Court an: ot8er $ourts 8a?e %een referre: to
T6o ear7ier reports of La6 Commission& name7>& (23t8 report
an: !!'t8 report& 8a?e %een referre: to at t8e appropriate p7a$es
In regar: to nion Territories& a %rief supp7ementa7 report 6i77
%e sent after t8e reuisite information is re$ei?e: from .ig8
$ourts
Wit8 regar:s&
4ours sin$ere7>
0 * V REDDI 1
Dr M Veerappa Moi7>&
nion Minister for La6 H 9usti$e&
Go?ernment of In:ia&
S8astri )8a?an&
Ne6 De78i ((' ''(
5
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
6/37
LatestLaws.com
I REFERENCE
1.1.1 Based on the comments made by the Department-Related
Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Pblic
!rie"ances, #a$ and %stice in its &'th Report1 $hile considering
the Spreme Cort (Nmber o) %dges* +mendment Bill, &',
the Department o) %stice reested the #a$ Commission o)
ndia& to consider the isse o) treating the Corporates separately
in the matter o) payment o) cort-)ee so that higher cort-)ee
may be demanded )rom the corporate sector on ad "alorem
basis.
1.1.& /he Parliamentary Standing Committee $as in )a"or o)
le"y o) di))erential cort-)ee )or the corporate sector and
accordingly, recommended0 that amendments be carried ot in
the rele"ant rles in terms o) +rticle 12 o) the Constittion.
+rticle 12 pro"ides that sb3ect to the pro"isions o) any
la$ made by Parliament, the Spreme Cort may )rom time
to time, $ith the appro"al o) the President, ma4e rles
)or reglating
( !2t8 Report of t8e Department-Re7ate: *ar7iamentar> Stan:ing Committee on *ersonne7& *u%7i$ Grie?an$es&La6 an: 9usti$e on t8e Supreme Court 0Num%er of 9u:ges1 Amen:ment )i77& !''2 presente: to t8e .on%7eC8airman& Ra@>a Sa%8a on +t8 August& !''2! Department of 9usti$es Letter No L-(('(2=(=!''!-9us :ate: (//!''3 T8e sai: 7etter ina:?ertent7> refersto !(st Report of t8e *ar7iamentar> Stan:ing Committee on t8e J9u:ges 0Inuir>1 )i77& !''#" *aragrap8s /+ an: /5 of t8e !2 t8 Report of t8e *ar7iamentar> Stan:ing Committee
#
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
7/37
LatestLaws.com
generally the practice and procedre o) the Cort, inclding
"arios matters speci)ied in sb-clases (a* to (3*. /he
Committee obser"ed that the corporate and stattory bodies
ha"e to pay only ma5imm cort-)ee o) Rs.&,6- )or going to
Spreme Cort, and sch entities ma4e se o) the 3dicial
in)rastrctre at the minimm e5pense and considerable time is
spent by the Spreme Cort on the litigation by sch corporate
bodies. /he Committee )rther obser"ed that the
corporate6commercial bodies ha"e hge )inancial resorces at
their disposal and in"ariably their disptes are $orth crores o)
rpees and, there)ore, it $old be reasonable i) they are
reired to pay cort-)ees on ad "alorem basis ranging
bet$een 17 and 27 o) the total "ale o) the dispte. /he
Standing Committee )rther made speci)ic re)erence to some o)
the )iscal and other enactments "i8. Cstoms +ct, Central E5cise
+ct, ncome-ta5 +ct, Consmer Protection +ct, 9R/P +ct,
/elecom Reglatory +thority o) ndia +ct, SEB +ct, nder
$hich the companies can )ile appeals to the Spreme Cort by
paying the ma5imm )ee o) Rs.&,6- $hich is grossly
inadeate. /he Committee pointed ot that the additional
re"ene generated by charging higher )ee on corporate bodies
cold be sed by the State )or )l)illing the directi"es laid do$n
in +rticle 0:+ o) the constittion. /he Committee )elt that by
increasing the cort-)ees on ad "alorem basis, the Spreme
Cort can add to its re"ene mani)old and the resltant re"ene
/
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
8/37
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
9/37
LatestLaws.com
- E+R#ER REP=R/S
&.1 +t the otset, it may be stated that the #a$ Commissiono) ndia in its 1':th Report (&* recommended that ha"ing
regard to the de"alation o) rpee and increase in in)lation, the
rates o) )i5ed cort-)ees as prescribed in Schedle & o) the
Cort-)ees +ct 1'> need to be appropriately re"ised. t $as
also obser"ed that ad "alorem cort-)ees need not be re"ised in
as mch as the )ee $ill be paid in proportion to the "ale o) theclaim $hich in any e"ent $old re)lect the enhanced "ale o)
the claim a)ter in)lation. /hat means, those cases in"ol"ing
high sta4es $ill attract higher cort-)ees as a conseence o) ad
"alorem cort-)ee. /he recommendation $as that in so )ar as
the ?nion territories not co"ered by their respecti"e +cts are
concerned, it $ill be s))icient i) the rates o) cort-)ee asprescribed in the Cort-)ees +ct 1'> be enhanced 4eeping in
mind the de"alation o) rpee o"er the years. /he present
Commission $hile reiterating the said "ie$s sggests that the
ma5imm cort-)ee $here"er prescribed shold also be
reasonably increased in "ie$ o) long passage o) time and the
change o) circmstances.
+ La6 Commission of In:ia& (23 t8 Report on KRe?ision of Court Fees Stru$ture 0!''+1& pages 3#& ((!-(("
3
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
10/37
LatestLaws.com
&.& /he #a$ Commission in its &&th Report (&:*2 stressed
on the need to )i5 the ma5imm )or the cort-)ees chargeable.
n this conte5t, it may be mentioned that in Delhi and in
Chandigarh, there is no ma5imm prescribed.
&.0 Be)ore proceeding to address the crcial isse, $e may
brie)ly recapitlate the position relating to the legislati"e po$ers
o) the Parliament and the State #egislatres "is-@-"is cort-)ees.
/he 1':th Report has elaborately discssed this aspect and $e
$old li4e to ote the e5cerpts there)romA
From the abo"e entries, it is e"ident that the sb3ect o)
Cort-)ees, so )ar it relates to Spreme Cort, )alls nder
Entry >> o) #ist (?nion #ist*. Cort-)ees in igh Corts
and other Sbordinate Corts, )alls nder Entry 0 o) #ist
(State #ist*.
Entry :< o) #ist , Entry o) #ist
also deal $ith )ees, bt )ees ta4en in any Cort is
speci)ically e5clded in these speci)ic entries.
(a* #a$ on Cort-)ees payable in the igh Cort and
sbordinate CortsA t is necessary to mention here that
the entry relating to the administration o) 3stice, $as
5 La6 Commission of In:ia& !!' t8 Report on KNee: to fi< Ma
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
11/37
LatestLaws.com
originally in Entry 0 o) #ist . Bt by "irte o) the
Constittion (Forty-Second* +mendment +ct, 1:>>. /hogh administration o) 3stice no$ )alls
nder Entry 11+ o) #ist , the sb3ect o) )ees ta4en in
any cort, $hich may be said to be related to
administration o) 3stice, does not )all nder #ist in
"ie$ o) the e5plicit bar nder Entry > o) #ist
mentioned abo"e. /he e))ect o) this Constittional
amendment still remains the same i.e. the po$er to
legislate on matters o) cort-)ees remains in the
competence o) the State #egislatres, so )ar as the igh
Corts and Corts sbordinate thereto are concerned.
/hs, as )ar as Parliament is concerned, nder +rt.&<
(1* read $ith Entry >> o) #ist , it can enact a la$ relating
to Cort-)ees $hich is payable in Spreme Cort, and
nder +rt.&
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
12/37
LatestLaws.com
- EG+9N+/=N =F SS?E FR=9 /E C=NS//?/=N+#
+N!#E (+R/C#E 1*
0.1 No$, $e shall address the estion $hether it is
constittionally permissible to prescribe a di))erent and higher
cort-)ee )or the corporations. /he )ndamental right to
eality garanteed by +rticle 1 o) the Constittion does not
rle ot reasonable classi)ication. /here need not be and
oght not to be ni)orm rates o) ta5ation (or )ee* applicable toall classes o) persons and to all the ob3ects o) ta5ation. n )act,
it is a $ell - settled principle reiterated in a series o) decisions o)
the Spreme Cort o) ndia as $ell as the Constittional Corts
o) other contries that in matters o) ta5ation, the #egislatre
en3oys greater )reedom o) classi)ication and its range o) choice
is mch $ider. He may in this conte5t re)er to the decision o) the Spreme Cort in P.9. +sh$athanarayana Setty and =rs.
Is. State o) Jarnata4a and =rs. (+R 1:': SC 1* in $hich the
constittional "alidity o) the cort-)ees enactments o) three
States came p )or consideration. /he Spreme Cort obser"ed
thsA
K./hogh other legislati"e measres dealing $ith
economic reglation are not otside +rt. 1, it is $ell
recogni8ed that the State en3oys the $idest latitde $here
measres o) economic reglation are concerned. /hese
(!
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
13/37
LatestLaws.com
measres )or )iscal and economic reglation in"ol"e an
e"alation o) di"erse and ite o)ten con)licting economic
criteria and ad3stment and balancing o) "arios
con)licting social and economic "ales and interests. t is
)or the State to decide $hat economic and social policy it
shold prse and $hat discriminations ad"ance those
special and economic policies. n "ie$ o) the inherent
comple5ity o) these )iscal ad3stments, Corts gi"e a
larger discretion to the #egislatre in the matter o) its
pre)erences o) economic and social policies and
e))ectate the chosen system in all possible and
reasonable $ays. ) t$o or more methods o)
ad3stments o) an economic measre are a"ailable, the
#egislati"e pre)erence in )a"or o) one o) them cannot be
estioned on the grond o) lac4 o) legislati"e $isdom or
that the method adopted is not the best or that there
$ere better $ays o) ad3sting the competing interests and
claims. /he legislatre possesses the greatest )reedom in
sch areas. /he analogy o) principles o) the brden o) ta5
may not also be inapposite in dealing $ith the "alidity o)
the distribtion o) the brden o) a )ee as $ell. (para
0*
+)ter oting the principles laid do$n in earlier cases, it
$as obser"edA
("
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
14/37
LatestLaws.com
K./he comple5ity o) economic matters and the pragmatic
soltions to be )ond )or them de)y and go beyond
conceptal mental models. Social and economic problems
o) a policy do not accord $ith preconcei"ed stereotypes so
as to be amenable to pre-determined soltions. (para
01*
/hen, at para 0&, it $as pointed ot that the estion
$hether the measre o) a ta5 or a )ee shold be ad "alorem or
ad antm is again a matter o) )iscal policy.
0.& n the case o) ncome-ta5 =))icer, Shillong "s. N.
/a4in Roy Rymbai (+R 1:>< SC * it $as obser"edA
K.Nor the mere )act that a ta5 )alls more hea"ily on some
in the same category, is by itsel) a grond to render the
la$ in"alid. t is only $hen $ithin the range o) its
selection, the la$ operates neally and cannot be
3sti)ied on the basis o) a "alid classi)ication, that there
$old be a "iolation o) +rticle 1. (para &*
0.0 n +sh$athanarayana Settys case, the Spreme Cort
pheld the constittional "alidity o) the Ra3asthan and Jarnata4a
(+
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
15/37
LatestLaws.com
Cort-)ees and Sits Ialation +cts. o$e"er, a particlar
pro"ision in Bombay Cort-)ees +ct $as strc4 do$n as
nconstittional. /he reason $as that the Cort-)ees on
proceedings )or grant o) probate and letters o) administration
ad "alorem $ithot the pper limit prescribed as in the case o)
other proceedings $as discriminatory. /he Spreme Cort
agreed $ith the "ie$ o) the igh cort that there $as no
intelligible or rational di))erentia bet$een the t$o classes o)
litigations ha"ing rational ne5s to the ob3ecti"e. /he Spreme
Cort noticed that the party $ho $as plainti)) in a probate
proceeding $as called pon to pay a cort-)ees o) Rs.
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
16/37
LatestLaws.com
0. /he Spreme Cort also made an obser"ation that the
prescription o) high rates o) cort-)ees e"en in small claims as
also $ithot an pper limit in larger claims is perilosly close to
arbitrariness, an nconstittionality.
0.2 Classi)ication )or the prpose o) ta5ation based on the
)inancial capacity has been held to be permissible classi)ication
by the Spreme Cort in certain other cases arising nder the
Sales /a5 and other ta5 la$s.
0.< /he Commission is, there)ore, o) the "ie$ that the
prescription o) higher cort-)ees )or corporate sector or any
other category o) litigants $ill not per se o))end any
constittional principle, pro"ided that there is reasonable
3sti)ication to treat them on a di))erent )ooting. /here mst be
intelligible di))erentia to spport the classi)ication. /he
Commission is clari)ying this point becase in an earlier report
(&&th Report*,
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
17/37
LatestLaws.com
)ees lea"ing ot a))lent indi"idals and associations o)
indi"idals. ) capacity to pay more is the criterion, $hy shold
there be a distinction bet$een the corporations and eally i)
not more prosperos other litigantsL n )act, this is one o) the
considerations $hich $eighed $ith the #a$ 9inisters as )ar bac4
as 1:'. /he isse o) rationali8ation o) cort-)ee $as e5amined
by the Committee o) #a$ 9inisters in =ct. 1:' and the
sggestion o) di))erential cort-)ees )or corporate sector $as
trned do$n by the Committee $ith the )ollo$ing noteA
/he +d"ocates !eneral o) Jerala and Hest Bengal $ere
o) the "ie$ that there $as no 3sti)ication )or e5tending
concessions proposed in the matter o) cort-)ees to the
companies. /hey )rther said that di))erential rates o)
cort-)ees cold be prescribed )or payment by indi"idals
and corporate bodies6companies. /hey )elt that there
might not be any constittional bar in doing so.( para
'.12*
Hhether the sit is )iled by an indi"idal or a company,
the ser"ice rendered by the cort is the same. t may be
arged that companies6corporate bodies are in a position
to pay. Bt so may be the case $ith se"eral indi"idals.
o$ cold then a di))erential rate o) cort-)ee be
3sti)iedL +lso, among companies, there may be strong
(/
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
18/37
LatestLaws.com
and $ea4 ones. /here may be di))erences in si8e,
)inancial "iability, etc. +gain, i) a di))erential rate is
accepted, !o"ernment nderta4ings $ill also be co"ered.
(para '.1
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
19/37
LatestLaws.com
I - CER/+N DE/+#S RE#+/N! /= C=RP=R+/E #/!+/=N
.1 Be)ore proceeding to discss the alternati"e optiona"ailable, the Commission $old li4e to place on record certain
data6statistics relating to the Cort-)ee re"ene and the
corporate cases )iled in the Spreme Cort. /he o"erall re"ene
)rom the cort-)ees )or the years &>-', &'-: and &:-
1 is Rs. 11: la4hs, 1&' la4hs and 100 la4hs, respecti"ely. /he
total bdgetary allocation to the Spreme Cort dring thepreceding year (&:* $as abo"e Rs. 1 crores. /he
Commission, a)ter ma4ing some e))orts, cold obtain the details
o) cases )iled in t$o months, i.e., %anary and Febrary &1
in order to identi)y distinctly the ci"il appeals (inclding those
relating to ta5ation and other special +cts* institted by the
companies6corporations. /he appeals attract the ma5imm )eeo) Rs.&,6-
.& /he Special #ea"e Petitions (S#Ps-Ci"il* registered in the
month o) %anary &1 $ere &2> and those in Febrary $ere
&1'>. =t o) them, 1&0 S#Ps-Ci"il in %anary and 1'2 in
Febrary relate to pri"ate sector companies. Dring the sameperiod, as many as : and &02 S#Ps (Ci"il* $ere those )iled by
pblic sector companies6nderta4ings. /hs, as )ar as
Companies other than PS?s are concerned, the a"erage nmber
o) S#Ps (Ci"il* )iled in a month $or4s ot to abot 12 cases.
(3
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
20/37
LatestLaws.com
9ost o) the cases )iled by the companies inclding PS?s are
ta5ation matters and appeals nder special enactments relating
to /elecom Disptes, Electricity Reglation, Consmer Disptes
etc. For the S#Ps, a nominal )i5ed )ee is charged as in the case
o) Hrit petitions in the igh Corts. Hhen the S#Ps are
admitted a)ter hearing, those S#Ps $ill be con"erted into ci"il
appeals and )or ci"il appeals, the ma5imm )ee presently
chargeable is Rs.&,6. +bot 27 or more S#Ps are
generally re3ected at admission stage. /hs, assming abot >
or ' cases o) pri"ate sector companies are nmbered as ci"il
appeals, the cort-)ees re"ene presently being )etched )rom
the companies $hose appeals are so entertained is to the tne
o) abot 1.
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
21/37
LatestLaws.com
the igh Cort arising ot o) /+/s orders (nder the
ncome-ta5 +ct* and other ta5ation stattes, the )ee
charged by the igh Corts inclding the Delhi igh Cort is
nominal. +t the stage o) appeal to the /ribnal also, the )ee
paid is ite small, as noted earlier. n no State or ?nion
territory, the ad "alorem cort-)ee is charged in respect o)
appeals6re)erences arising nder ta5ation and other )iscal
enactments. Normally, the appeals arising nder the said
enactments in"ol"e hea"y sta4es and they are mostly )iled
by companies, trsts, )irms and societies. /he other
category o) appeals $hich in"ol"e hea"y sta4es )iled by
companies and )irms are those nder the +rbitration and
Conciliation +ct, 1::
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
22/37
LatestLaws.com
dispense $ith that principle in respect o) any category o) ci"il
appeals )iled by the companies or others.
..& nterestingly, the case o) Central Coal Fields #td. Is.
%ais$al Coal Co. (+R 1:' SC &1&2* illstrates ho$ the high
antm o) cort-)ee $ithot ma5imm limit cased problems
to a PS? to )ile an appeal. /he Spreme Cort obser"ed, i) the
Central !o"ernment or its agent disco"ered that the cort-)ee
$as disastrosly bac4-brea4ing, one shold ha"e e5pected it, as
the promoter o) ine5pensi"e 3stice )or the people, to nderta4e
ni)orm legislation redcing the scale o) cort-)ees consistently
$ith economic 3stice and ci"ili8ed processal 3risprdence...
(para 0*
.2 /he Commission $old li4e to restate the $ell-settled
principle that cort-)ee shold not be "ie$ed as the chie) sorce
o) re"ene to rn the corts. t is trite that the cost o)
administration o) 3stice, being a so"ereign )nction essential to
the democratic system o) go"ernance cannot be e"alated in
terms o) the cort-)ees generated. Secondly, cort-)ee oght
not to be "ie$ed as a means to chec4 "e5atios litigation.
E"en i) a part o) the litigation is "e5atios, an abnormal increase
in the antm o) cort-)ee $old case hardship to genine
litigants. n this conte5t, the Commission $old li4e to
mention that it is nderta4ing a separate stdy on the sb3ect o)
!!
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
23/37
LatestLaws.com
costs and appropriate amendments to Code o) Ci"il Procedre
so that the cort $ill be in a position to impose hea"y costs on
)ri"olos and "e5atios litigation.
I. P=S/=N N F=RE!N C=?N/RES
2 /he Commission has noticed that no separate cort )ee
has been prescribed )or the corporates in most o) the )oreign
contries inclding S++RC contries, ?nited Jingdom, Canada,
etc. o$e"er, in +stralia: and Ne$ Soth Hales, corporates
are liable to pay doble the amont o) cort-)ee payable by
other sitors in respect o) certain matters.
3 Fe:era7 Magistrates Regu7ations !'''& Statutor> Ru7es !''' No ('! as amen:e: &prepare: %> t8e Offi$e of Legis7ati?e Drafting an: *u%7is8ing& Attorne>-Genera7s Department& Can%erra 0S$8e:u7e (1
!"
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
24/37
LatestLaws.com
I. E+SER +CCESS /= C=?R/S +ND C=?R/-FEE
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
25/37
LatestLaws.com
indigent person to )ile a sit $ithot payment o) cort-)ee or
any )ee )or ser"ice or process. +n indigent person is de)ined as
one $ho is not possessed o) s))icient means (other than
property e5empt )rom attachment* to pay the prescribed cort-
)ee. Eniry into the means o) an indigent person has been
simpli)ied by con)erring that po$er in the )irst instance on the
chie) ministerial o))icer o) the cort. Frther, the cort can
assign a pleader to an nrepresented indigent person in
accordance $ith the rles made by the igh Cort in this
regard. n regard to appeals, a similar pro"ision is there in
=rder G#I o) the Code o) Ci"il Procedre, 1:' enabling an
indigent person to )ile the appeal $ithot payment o) cort-
)ee. Hhere a party $as allo$ed to se or appeal as an
indigent person in the cort )rom $hose decree the appeal is
pre)erred, no )rther eniry in respect o) the estion $hether
or not he is an indigent person shall be necessary, i) the party
)iles an a))ida"it stating that he has not ceased to be an indigent
person since the date o) the decree.
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
26/37
LatestLaws.com
/he Spreme Cort #egal Ser"ices Committee headed by
another senior %dge consists o) ten members inclding the
+ttorney !eneral, the o))icials o) the concerned 9inistries 6
Departments o) !o"ernment o) ndia and +d"ocates practising
in the Spreme Cort. /he )nctions o) the central athority
(N+#S+* are speci)ied in section o) the said +ct. /he +ct also
pro"ides )or the constittion o) State #egal Ser"ices +thority,
igh Cort #egal Ser"ices Committee, District #egal Ser"ices
+thority and /al4 #egal Ser"ices Committees. Each athority
is reired to establish #egal +id Fnd. /he ma3or component
o) sch )nds are the grants gi"en by the N+#S+ and State
!o"ernments. Frther, considerable amonts are recei"ed by
these bodies by reason o) the orders o) the corts directing
remittance o) costs to the credit o) #egal Ser"ice +thority.
/he #egal Ser"ice +thorities in a ma3ority o) States ha"e
s))icient )nds at their disposal, bt, in)rastrctre is lac4ing in
many States. Hith the allocation o) sbstantial amonts to
#egal Ser"ice +thorities prsant to the recommendations o)
/hirteenth Finance Commission, the in)rastrctral )acilities are
bond to impro"e.
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
27/37
LatestLaws.com
(a* a member o) a Schedled Caste or Schedled
/ribe (b* a "ictim o) tra))ic4ing in hman beings (c* a
$oman or a child (d* a person $ith a disability (e* a
person nder circmstances o) ndeser"ed $ant sch as
being a "ictim o) a mass disaster, "iolence, natral
calamities etc ()* an indstrial $or4man (g* a person in
cstody, inclding cstody in a protecti"e home or a
3"enile home or psychiatric hospital and (h* in receipt o)
annal income less than rpees 2,6-.
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
28/37
LatestLaws.com
+dalats also in order to ensre speedy 3stice. /he N+#S+ has
recently )ramed a Scheme )or Free and Competent #egal
Ser"ices, &1. /he procedre )or approaching the Spreme
Cort #egal Ser"ices Committee by the persons entitled to legal
aid is by and large hassle-)ree. #o4 +dalats are held reglarly
nder the aspices o) #egal Ser"ice +thorities and Committees
at "arios le"els.
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
29/37
LatestLaws.com
)iling o) cases has been introdced $hich $old ob"iate the
need o) personal presence o) the appellant6petitioner at the
time o) )iling the cases. 9oreo"er, the Spreme Cort can
e5ercise its po$er nder =rder G#I Rle < o) the Spreme
Cort Rles, 1:
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
30/37
LatestLaws.com
I. S?99+RO +ND REC=99END+/=NS
>.1 n the light o) the legal and )actal position discssedabo"e, the Commission is inclined to ta4e the "ie$ that
companies6corporations alone cannot be )astened $ith the
liability to pay higher cort-)ee, lea"ing apart similarly sitated
category o) litigants $ho do bsiness. +t the same time, there
can be classi)ication based on the )inancial capacity to bear the
brden o) cort-)ee. /he )inancial capacity is broadly dedcible)rom the sta4es in"ol"ed or the "ale o) sb3ect matter o)
appeal. /he "ale or the sta4e o) appeal can be broadly
correlated to the capacity o) litigant. /he appellants in high
"ale appeals, mostly nder the special +cts are companies,
)irms, trsts or association o) persons or e"en indi"idals $ho
can all a))ord to pay higher cort-)ee $ithot any di))iclty. tis, there)ore, desirable that the p$ard re"ision o) cort-)ee
shold be nderta4en not merely $ith re)erence to appellants
$ho )all strictly $ithin the description o) companies6corporations
bt also other categories o) sitors depending on the "ale o)
the sb3ect matter in"ol"ed in the appeal. /his can be achie"ed
by prescribing ad "alorem cort-)ee sb3ect to the prescription
o) ceiling at a reasonable le"el. /hat means the higher the
sta4e, the more the litigant has to pay $ithin the ma5imm
limit. n the case o) ad "alorem cort-)ee, the )ee $ill be paid in
proportion to the "ale o) the claim. n )act, the Spreme Cort
"'
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
31/37
LatestLaws.com
Rles adopt the ad "alorem classi)ication, bt, in "ie$ o) the
paltry ceiling limit o) Rs.&,6-, there is no possibility o)
collecting higher cort-)ee )rom those litigants inclding
corporations $ho can a))ord to pay higher cort-)ee. /he
Spreme Cort Rles prescribe the cort-)ee o) Rs.&2 i) the
amont o) "ale o) the sb3ect matter in dispte is Rs.&,,
or belo$. For e"ery Rs.1, in e5cess o) Rs.&, the cort-
)ee payable is Rs.2 $hich $or4s ot to hal) percent. So )ar,
there is no problem. Bt, it stops at the ceiling o) Rs.&,
$hich $as prescribed .& /he Commission is, there)ore o) the "ie$ that a re-loo4 at
the present rles go"erning the cort-)ee in respect o) appeals
(' T8e Supreme Court Ru7es& (35' an: (3##&& T8ir: S$8e:u7e& *art II Appe77ate 9uris:i$tion
"(
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
32/37
LatestLaws.com
(Ci"il* )iled in the Spreme cort is highly desirable in "ie$ o)
the long passage o) time and the economic realities o) the day.
Hhile the hal) per cent rate o"er and abo"e Rs.&, can
remain (or it can be increased to one percent*, it $old be
reasonable to enhance the ma5imm cort-)ee at least to Rs.1
la4h. /hat is to say, )or the )igre Rs.&, occrring in clase
(1* o) the pro"iso to Sl. No. & o) Part- o) the Spreme Cort
Rles, Rs. 1 la4h (or more* needs to be sbstitted. /his is
broadly or sggestion and $e mst state that the Commission
has not done any speci)ic e5ercise to determine the e5act
antm as the Commission )eels that the Spreme Cort
Committee $old appropriately del"e into those details.
Frther, the )igre o) Rs.&2 $hich is the minimm payable as
$ell as the )ee o) Rs.&2 speci)ied in appeals incapable o)
"alation shold be sitably increased. /here is also e"ery
3sti)ication )or increasing the )ee )or special lea"e petitions,
$hich is presently a small sm o) Rs.&2. /he net reslt $ill be
that most o) the appeals )iled by the corporate and other
bsiness entities against ta5 6 )ee demands and other )iscal
liabilities and arbitration a$ards $ill come $ithin the net o)
enhanced cort-)ee regime. +t the same time, it $old be
rational and reasonable to charge only )i5ed cort-)ee (as
enhanced* in respect o) appeals that arise ot o) igh Corts
3dgments in ci"il matters, $here cort- )ee $old ha"e already
been paid on ad "alorem basis both at the trial stage and at the
"!
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
33/37
LatestLaws.com
appellate stage. He may also mention that in case o) indi"idal
hardship, the appellant concerned can al$ays approach the
Spreme Cort )or e5emption o) cort-)ee.
>.0 /he Commission, on ta4ing a holistic "ie$ has recorded
its broad sggestions )or the enhancement o) the ceiling
prescribed in the Spreme Cort Rles in relation to ad "alorem
)ee as $ell as )i5ed cort-)ee. /he proper and e5pedient corse
$old be to address the Spreme Cort )or sitable p$ard
re"ision o) the pre"ailing cort-)ee 4eeping in "ie$ the long
passage o) time and the hea"y sta4e cases that are coming p
be)ore the Spreme Cort in relation to matters arising nder
)iscal and other special enactments. /he Spreme Cort may
perhaps constitte a Committee o) %dges and conslt the
Spreme Cort Bar +ssociation, i) necessary. +s the rles
)ramed by the Spreme Cort in regard to cort-)ee ha"e been
in operation )or more than hal) a centry, it $old be in the
)itness o) things to lea"e the decision to enhance cort-)ee to
the Spreme Cort in the )irst instance. t is desirable and
proper that the Parliament does not straight$ay proceed to
spersede the Spreme Cort Rles and prescribe the scales o)
)ee by itsel) throgh legislation. /he
""
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
34/37
LatestLaws.com
Commission is o) the opinion that it $old be proper to
address the Spreme Cort indicating the tentati"e "ie$s o)
the Parliamentary Standing Committee and o) the #a$
Commission and sggesting an p$ard re"ision o) ma5immas $ell as )i5ed cort-)ee in Part- and in respect o) sch
other items in the Schedle as the Cort may consider
appropriate.
Union Territories
2 n regard to ma3or ?nion /erritories i.e., Chandigarh
and NC/ o) Delhi, the in)ormation soght )rom the igh
Corts as regards the applicable schedle o) cort-)ees
)or sits, appeals, etc. is a$aited. + brie) spplemental
report $ill be sbmitted by the Commission shortly, so
)ar as the ?/s are concerned.
%?S/CE P.I. REDDQ
CHAIRMAN
[JUSTICE SHIV KUMAR SHARMA] [AMARJIT SINGH]
MEMBER MEMBER
[DR. BRAHM A. AGRAWAL]
MEMBER-SECRETAR
Ne! De"#i-$$% %%$
D&te'( )*.$).)%$%
"+
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
35/37
LatestLaws.com
A++en'i,
TABLE CURT EE /SU0REME CURT1
0ART I
RIGINAL JURISDICTIN
( Filing and registering plaint
&2.
! Filing and registering $ritten statement 2.
" Filing and registering set-o)) or conter-claim 2.
+ Reply to a conter claim 2.5 E5amining and comparing docment $ith the original, )or each )olio .2
# Redcing into $riting or, $here ta4en do$n in shorthand,
transcribing the deposition o) $itnesses, )or each )olio. .
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
36/37
LatestLaws.com
0ART II
A00ELLATE JURISDICTIN
1. Petition )or special lea"e to appeal &2.
1(a* Consolidated process )ee )or intimating contesting respondents 1.
&. #odging and registering petition o) appeal M $here the amont o)
"ale o) the sb3ect-matter in dispte is Rs. &, or belo$ that sm &2.
For e"ery Rs. 1, in e5cess o) Rs. &, 2.
)or e"ery thosand rpees or par
thereo)
n case, $here it is not possible to estimate at a money "alethe sb3ect matter in dispte
Pro"ided -
(1*that the ma5imm )ee payable in any case shall not e5ceed Rs. &, and0!1 that $here an appeal is broght by special lea"e granted by the cort credit shall be
gi"en to the appellant )or the amont o) cort )ee paid by him on the petition )orspecial lea"e to appeal.Q
0. #odging o) statement o) case o) ca"eatQ &.. +pplication )or re"ie$ o) 3dgement or order o) cort the same )ee as $as paion the
original proceedings
"#
LatestLaws.com
8/19/2019 Law Commission Report No. 236- Court-fees in Supreme Court Vis-A-Vis Corporate Litigation
37/37
LatestLaws.com
2.petiton o) +ppeal nder Consmer Protection +ct, 1:'<
&2.
LatestLaws.com
Top Related