8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
1/47
Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Rights
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
2/47
Table of Contents
1 Preface................................................................................. 3
2 Introduction .......................................................................... 3
3 Overview of Corporate Social Responsibility ................................ 7
3.1 What is CSR?........................................................................ 7
3.2 Why has CSR become important?.............................................. 11
3.3 Business Case for CSR .......................................................... 14
3.4 Relationship between CSR and the law ........................................ 19
4 Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Rights ..................... 21
4.1 Introduction......................................................................... 22
4.2 Human Rights on the CSR Agenda............................................. 25
4.3 CSR and Human Rights: Main Initiatives ...................................... 26
4.3.1 Principles of United Nations Global Compact .................................. 26
4.3.2 United Nations Norms on the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations29
4.3.3 OECD Guidelines For Multinational Enterprises............................... 30
4.3.4 Amnesty International .............................................................. 31
4.3.5 Global Reporting Initiative......................................................... 31
5 CSR and Human Rights in India ............................................... 32
5.1 Example : Land Rights, Entitlements and CSR ................................... 32
5.1.1 Role of Corporate ................................................................ 35
5.1.2 Suggested Role for Corporates .............................................. 36
5.2 Example : CSR & Human rights in India: Indian Oil .............................. 37
6 Role of Judiciary- Contribution of Supreme Court / High Courts...... 40
7 Role of NGOs/Civil Society Groups and Business / Industry Associations
and other stake holders................................................................ 41
8 Conclusion and Suggestions .................................................. 42
9 Our Views regarding relevance of project for a business manager and
entrepreneur.............................................................................. 45
10 Reference ........................................................................... 46
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
3/47
1 Preface
One of humankinds greatest challenges this century will be to ensure
sustainable, just and balanced development. The needs of current and future
generations cannot be met unless there is respect for natural systems and international
standards protecting core social and environmental values. In this context, it is
increasingly recognized that the role of the business sector is critical. As a part of
society, it is in business interest to contribute to addressing common problems.
Strategically speaking, business can only flourish when the communities and
ecosystems in which they operate are healthy.
2 Introduction
Responsible business is good business
We are committed to creating economic value, but we are not indifferent
to how we do it. ... Progressive businesses are gaining competitive
advantage by responding to societal signals. ... We prosper by helping
society to prosper.
Idar Kreutzer, CEO Storebrand, 2005
There is growing recognition of the significant effect the activities of the private
sector haveon employees, customers, communities, the environment,
competitors, business partners, investors, shareholders, governments and
others. It is also becoming increasingly clear that firms can contribute to their
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
4/47
own wealth and to overall societal wealth by considering the effect they have on
the world at large when making decisions. Business opinion polls and corporate
behaviour both show increased levels of understanding of the link between
responsible business and good business. Also, investors and financial markets
are beginning to see that CSR activities that integrate broader societal concerns
into business strategy and performance are evidence of good management. In
addition to building trust with the community and giving firms an edge in
attracting good customers and employees, acting responsibly towards workers
and others in society can help build value for firms and their shareholders.
There is no way to avoid paying serious attention to corporate
citizenship: the costs of failing are simply too high. ... There are countless
win win opportunities waiting to be discovered: every activity in a firms
value chain overlaps in some way with social factorseverything from
how you buy or procure to how you do your researchyet very few
companies have thought about this. The goal is to leverage your
companys unique capabilities in supporting social causes, and improve
your competitive context at the same time. The job of todays leaders is to
stop being defensive and start thinking systematically about corporate
responsibility.
Michael Porter, Professor, Harvard Business School, at the April 2005
Business and Society Conference on Corporate Citizenship, sponsored
by the University of Torontos Rotman School of Management
It must be recognized up front that CSR still creates a degree of confusion and
controversy. Is the promotion and implementation of socially and environmentally
preferable corporate conducting a function of business or government? Is the
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
5/47
implementation of CSR practices a cost or a value-enhancer? Is it just public
relations? In part, the problem stems from definitional issues, and a perception in
some quarters that CSR is more about philanthropy, rather than doing business
and responding to shareholder interests. The central thesis is that CSR is an
integral part of the new business model.
Properly understood, CSR should be seen as the way that firmsworking with
those most affected by their decisions (often called stakeholders)can develop
innovative and economically viable products, processes and services within core
business processes, resulting in improved environmental protection and social
conditions. This approach manifests itself in many forms, including high profile
statements made by many corporate CEOs. Launching General Electrics
Ecomagination vision of a cleaner, healthier world, Chief Executive Jeffrey
Immelt underlined the companys commitment to find the big answers for the big
questionsclimate change, health, waterand to develop solutions, working in
partnership with governments and civil society;3 in other words, aligning core
business strategy with the changing social and environmental context.
We believe that the leading global companies of 2020 will be those that
provide goods and services and reach new customers in ways that
address the worlds major challengesincluding poverty, climate change,
resource depletion, globalization, and demographic shifts.
Niall Fitzgerald, former CEO & Chairman, Unilever
Businesses are an integral part of the communities in which they operate. Good
executives know that their long-term success is based on continued good
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
6/47
relations with a wide range of individuals, groups and institutions. Smart firms
know that business cant succeed in societies that are failingwhether this is
due to social or environmental challenges, or governance problems. Moreover,
the general public has high expectations of the private sector in terms of
responsible behaviour. Consumers expect goods and services to reflect socially
and environmentally responsible business behaviour at competitive prices.
Shareholders also are searching for enhanced financial performance that
integrates social and environmental considerations, both in terms of risk and
opportunities. Governments, too, are becoming aware of the national competitive
advantages to be won from a responsible business sector. At the same time,
leading industry associations, such as the World Business Council for
Sustainable Development, have also suggested that countries as well as
companies might gain a competitive advantage from corporate social
responsibility. In much of the developing world, governments and business
understand that their respective competitive positions, and access to capital,
Increasingly depends on being seen to respect the highest global standards.
Even companies which may have a good reputation can risk losing their hard-
earned name when they fail to put systematic approaches in place to ensure
continued positive performance. The effect of a tarnished reputation often
extends far beyond that one firm: entire sectors and, indeed, nations can suffer.
Hardly a month goes by without some example of a major corporation suffering a
reduced market position as a result of questionable behaviour, with many others
subsequently finding themselves to be a part of the collateral damage. These
firms frequently expend considerable time and money attempting to regain their
reputation, with mixed results.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
7/47
3 Overview of Corporate Social Responsibility
3.1 What is CSR?
Social responsibility (is the) responsibility of an organization for the
impacts of its decisions and activities on society and the environment
through transparent and ethical behaviour that is consistent with
sustainable development and the welfare of society; takes into account the
expectations of stakeholders; is in compliance with applicable law and
consistent with international norms of behaviour; and is integrated
throughout the organization.
Working definition, ISO 26000 Working Group on Social Responsibility,
Sydney, February 2007
Corporate social responsibility (CSR, also called corporate responsibility,
corporate Citizenship, and responsible business) is a concept whereby organizations
consider the interests of society by taking responsibility for the impact of their activities
on customers, suppliers, employees, shareholders, communities and other
stakeholders, as well as the environment. This obligation is seen to extend beyond the
statutory obligation to comply with legislation and sees organizations voluntarily taking
further steps to improve the quality of life for employees and their families as well as
for the local community and society at large. The practice of CSR is subject to much
debate and criticism. Proponents argue that there is a strong business case for CSR,
in that corporations benefit in multiple ways by operating with a perspective broader
and longer than their own immediate, short-term profits. Critics argue that CSR
distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
8/47
nothing more than superficial window-dressing; still others argue that it is an attempt
to preempt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful multinational
corporations. A key point to note is that CSR is an evolving concept that currently
does not have a universally accepted definition. Generally, CSR is understood to be
the way firms integrate social, environmental and economic concerns into their values,
culture, decision making, strategy and operations in a transparent and accountable
manner and thereby establish better practices within the firm, create wealth and
improve society. As issues of sustainable development become more important, the
question of how the business sector addresses them is also becoming an element of
CSR.
The World Business Council for Sustainable Development has described CSR as
the business contribution to sustainable economic development. Building on a base of
compliance with legislation and regulations, CSR typically includes beyond law
commitments and activities pertaining to:
y Corporate governance and ethics.
y Health and safety.
y
Environmental stewardship;y Human rights (including core labor rights);
y Sustainable development.
y Conditions of work (including safety and health, hours of work,
wages).
y Industrial relations.
y Community involvement, development and investment.
y Involvement of and respect for diverse cultures and disadvantaged
peoples.
y Corporate philanthropy and employee volunteering.
y Customer satisfaction and adherence to principles of fair
competition.
y Anti-bribery and anti-corruption measures.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
9/47
y Accountability, transparency and performance reporting; and
y Supplier relations, for both domestic and international supply
chains.
Generally, CSR is understood to be the way firms integrate social,
environmental and economic concerns into their values, culture,
decision making, strategy and operations in a transparent and
accountable manner, and thereby establish better practices within
the firm, create wealth and improve society.
It is also important to bear in mind that there are two separate drivers for CSR.
One relates to public policy. Because the impacts of the business sector are so
large, and with a potential to be either positive or negative, it is natural that
governments and wider society take a close interest in what business does. Thismeans that the expectations on businesses are rising; governments will be
looking for ways to increase the positive contribution of business. The second
driver is the business driver. Here, CSR considerations can be seen as both
costs (e.g., of introducing new approaches) or benefits (e.g., of improving brand
value, or introducing products that meet sustainability demands). The remainder
of this guide addresses the second of these drivers.
Since businesses play a pivotal role both in job and wealth creation in society
and in the efficient use of natural capital, CSR is a central management concern.
It positions companies to both proactively manage risks and take advantage of
opportunities, especially with respect to their corporate reputation and the broad
engagement of stakeholders. The latter can include shareholders, employees,8
customers, communities, suppliers, governments, non-governmental
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
10/47
organizations, international organizations and others affected by a companys
activities. Above all, CSR is about sensitivity to contextboth societal and
environmentaland related performance. It is about moving beyond declared
intentions to effective and observable actions and measurable societal impacts.
Performance reporting is all part of transparent, accountableand, hence,
crediblecorporate behaviour. There is considerable potential for problems if
stakeholders perceive that a firm is engaging in a public relations exercise and
cannot demonstrate concrete actions that lead to real social and environmental
benefits.
Corporate responsibility is the basis on which business
renegotiates and aligns the boundaries of its accountability.
Responsible Competitiveness: Reshaping Global Markets Though
Responsible Business Practices, AccountAbility, December 2005
CSR can involve a wide range of stakeholders.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
11/47
A corporations stakeholders can include: shareholders, non-governmental
organizations, business partners, lenders, insurers, communities, regulators,
intergovernmental bodies, consumers, employees and investors.
3.2 Why has CSR become important?
In the flat world, with lengthy global supply chains, the balance of
power between global companies and the individual communities in
which they operate is tilting more and more in favor of the
companies. As such these companies are going to command
more power, not only to create value but also to transmit values,
than any other institution on the planet.
Thomas L. Friedman, The World is Flat, 2005.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
12/47
Many factors and influences have led to increasing attention being devoted to the
role of companies and CSR. These include:
y Sustainable development: United Nations (UN) studies and many
others have underlined the fact that humankind is using natural
resources at a faster rate than they are being replaced. If this
continues, future generations will not have the resources they need
for their development. In this sense, much of current development
is unsustainableit cant be continued for both practical and moral
reasons. Related issues include the need for greater attention to
poverty alleviation and respect for human rights. CSR is an entry
point for understanding sustainable development issues and
responding to them in a firms business strategy.
y Globalization: With its attendant focus on cross-border trade,
multinational enterprises and global supply chainseconomic
globalization is increasingly raising CSR concerns related to human
resource management practices, environmental protection, and
health and safety, among other things. CSR canplay a vital role in
detecting how business impacts labor conditions, local communitiesand economies, and what steps can be taken to ensure business
helps to maintain and build the public good. This can be especially
important for export-oriented firms in emerging economies.
y Governance: Governments and intergovernmental bodies, such as
the UN, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) and the International Labour Organization
(ILO) have developed various compacts, declarations, guidelines,
principles and other instruments that outline norms for what they
consider to be acceptable business conduct. CSR instruments
often reflect internationally-agreed goals and laws regarding human
rights, the environment and anti-corruption.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
13/47
y Corporate sector impact: The sheer size and number of
corporations, and their potential to impact political, social and
environmental systems relative to governments and civil society,
raise questions about influence and accountability. Even small and
medium size enterprises (SMEs), which collectively represent the
largest single employer, have a significant impact.
Companies are global ambassadors of change and values. How
they behave is becoming a matter of increasing interest and
importance.
y Communications:Advances in communications technology,
such as the Internet and mobile phones, are making it easier to
track and discuss corporate activities. Internally, this can facilitate
management, reporting and change. Externally, NGOs, the media
and others can quickly assess and profile business practices they
view as either problematic or exemplary. In the CSR context,
modern communications technology offers opportunities to improve
dialogue and partnerships.
y Finance: Consumers and investors are showing increasing interest
in supporting responsible business practices and are demanding
more information on how companies are addressing risks and
opportunities related to social and environmental issues.A sound
CSR approach can help build share value, lower the cost of capital,
and ensure better responsiveness to markets.
y Ethics:A number of serious and high-profile breaches of corporate
ethics resulting in damage to employees, shareholders,
communities or the environmentas well as share pricehave
contributed to elevated public mistrust of corporations.A CSR
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
14/47
approach can help improve corporate governance, transparency,
accountability and ethical standards.
y Consistency and Community: Citizens in many countries
are making it clear that corporations should meet the same high standards
of social and environmental care, no matter where they operate. In the
CSR context, firms can help build a sense of community and shared
approach to common problems.
y Leadership:At the same time, there is increasing
awareness of the limits of government legislative and regulatory initiatives
to effectively capture all the issues that CSR address. CSR can offer the
flexibility and incentive for firms to act in advance of regulations, or in
areas where regulations seem unlikely.
y Business Tool: Businesses are recognizing that adopting an
effective approach to CSR can reduce the risk of business
disruptions, open up new opportunities, drive innovation, enhance
brand and company reputation and even improve efficiency.
3.3 Business Case for CSR
The business case for CSR will differ from firm to firm, depending on a number of
factors. These include the firms size, products, activities, location, suppliers,
leadership and reputation (i.e., of the sector in which the firm operates). Another
factor is the approach a firm takes to CSR, which can vary from being strategic
and incremental on certain issues to becoming a mission-oriented CSR leader.
The business case for CSR also revolves around the fact that firms that fail to
engage parties affected by their activities can jeopardize their ability to create
wealth for themselves and society, and increase the risk of legal or other
responses. Taking into account
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
15/47
the interests and contributions of those one affects is the basis for ethical
behavior and sound governance. CSR is essentially a strategic approach for
firms to take to anticipate and address issues associated with their interactions
with others and, through those interactions, succeed in their business endeavors.
There is growing consensus about the connection between CSR and business
success. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)
has noted that a coherent CSR strategy based on integrity, sound values and a
long-term approach offers clear business benefits to companies and contributes
to the well-being of society.
Potential benefits of implementing a CSR approach
We believe in CSR because it is a proposition aligned with our
values, but also because it makes business sense. Our commercial
partners expect from us sound environmental and social practices.
We get and understand the message and are actively promoting
CSR among associates. We want to be recognized as a
responsible industry, adding value to our products.
Ronald Bown, President, Chilean Fruit Exporters Association (at
GRI G3 launch, October 2006)
Key potential benefits for firms implementing CSR include:
y Better anticipation and management of an ever-expanding
spectrum of risk.Effectively managing governance, legal, social,
environmental, economic and other risks in an increasingly complex
market environment, with greater oversight and stakeholder
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
16/47
scrutiny of corporate activities, can improve the security of supply
and overall market stability. Considering the interests of parties
concerned about a firms impact is one way of better anticipating
and managing risk.
y Improved reputation management.Organizations that perform
well with regard to CSR can build their reputation, while those that
perform poorly can damage brand and company value when
exposed. Reputation, or brand equity, is founded on values such as
trust, credibility, reliability, quality and consistency. Even for firms
that do not have direct retail exposure through brands, their
reputation for addressing CSR issues as a supply chain partner
both good and badcan be crucial commercially.
y Enhanced ability to recruit, develop and retain staff.This can
be the direct result of pride in the companys products and
practices, or of introducing improved human resources practices,
such as family-friendly policies. It can also be the indirect result of
programs and activities that improve employee morale and loyalty.Employees are not only front-line sources of ideas for improved
performance, but are champions of a company for which they are
proud to work.
y Improved innovation, competitiveness and market positioning.
CSR is as much about seizing opportunity as avoiding risk. Drawing
feedback from diverse stakeholders can be a rich source of ideas
for new products, processes and markets, resulting in competitive
advantages. For example, a firm may become certified to
environmental and social standards so it can become a supplier to
particular retailers. The history of good business has always been
one of being alert to trends, innovation, and responding to markets.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
17/47
Increasingly, mainstream advertising features the environmental or
social benefits of products (e.g., hybrid cars, unleaded petrol,
ethically produced coffee, wind turbines, etc.).
y Enhanced operational efficiencies and cost savings.These flow
in particular from improved efficiencies identified through a
systematic approach to management that includes continuous
improvement. For example, assessing the environmental and
energy aspects of an operation can reveal opportunities for turning
waste streams into revenue streams (wood chips into particle
board, for example) and for system-wide reductions in energy use,
and costs.
y Improved ability to attract and build effective and efficient
supply chain relationships.A firm is vulnerable to the weakest
link in its supply chain. Like-minded companies can form profitable
long-term business relationships by improving standards, and
thereby reducing risks. Larger firms can stimulate smaller firms with
whom they do business to implement a CSR approach. Forexample, some large apparel retailers require their suppliers to
comply with worker codes and standards.
y Enhanced ability to address change.A company with its ear to
the ground through regular stakeholder dialogue is in a better
position to anticipate and respond to regulatory, economic, social
and environmental changes that may occur. Increasingly, firms use
CSR as a radar to detect evolving trends in the market.
y More robust social license to operate in the community.
Improved citizen and stakeholder understanding of the firm and its
objectives and activities translate into improved stakeholder
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
18/47
relations. This, in turn, may evolve into more robust and enduring
public, private and civil society alliances (all of which relate closely
to CSR reputation, discussed above). CSR can help build social
capital.
y Access to capital.Financial institutions are increasingly
incorporating social and environmental criteria into their
assessment of projects. When making decisions about where to
place their money, investors are looking for indicators of effective
CSR management. A business plan incorporating a good CSR
approach is often seen as a proxy for good management.
y Improved relations with regulators.In a number of jurisdictions,
governments
have expedited approval processes for firms that have undertaken
social and environmental activities beyond those required by
regulation. In some countries, governments use (or are considering
using) CSR indicators in deciding on procurement or exportassistance contracts. This is being done because governments
recognize that without an increase in business sector engagement,
government sustainability goals cannot be reached.
y A catalyst for responsible consumption.Changing
unsustainable patterns of consumption is widely seen as an
important driver to achieving sustainable development. Companies
have a key role to play in facilitating sustainable consumption
patterns and lifestyles through the goods and services they provide
and the way they provide them. Responsible consumerism is not
exclusively about changing consumer preferences. It is also about
what goods are supplied in the marketplace, their relationship to
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
19/47
consumer rights and sustainability issues, and how regulatory
authorities mediate the relationship between producers and
consumers.
3.4 Relationship between CSR and the law
There is a close relationship between CSR and the law. The main instrument
governments use to address a firms social, environmental and economic
impacts is the law. Many countries have a wide range of laws, whether at the
national, state or local levels of government, relating to consumers, workers,
health and safety, human rights and environmental protection, bribery and
corruption, corporate governance and taxation. A firms CSR approach should
begin by ensuring full compliance with those laws already in place. No matter
how good a CSR policy may be, failure to observe the law will undermine other
good efforts. Looking ahead, the CSR activities of firms can be seen as a
proactive method of addressing potentially problematic conduct before it attracts
legal attention.
A key feature of the emerging CSR debate is the difference between a
compliance mentality (i.e., only doing those things that are required) and a
value driven mentality (i.e., using a CSR approach to innovate and seek new
markets). Some commentators argue that a compliance-based approach does
not help business, because it tends not to drive innovation and the out of the
box thinking they see as necessary in the rapidly changing business world. That
said, a number of specific legal aspects are worth mentioning.
y Performance reporting and the law.In many jurisdictions there
are laws in place requiring firms in particular sectors to publicly
disclose certain of their practices and activities. The U.K.
Companies Act 2006, for example, requires publicly-listed
companies to report on a number of specific issues where they are
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
20/47
necessary to understanding the companys business. These
include environmental matters (including the impact of the
companys business on the environment), the companys
employees, social and community issues, and risks through the
company supply chains. Similar provisions also exist in France and
across the EU.
y Corporate governance and disclosure.Social and environmental
issues are increasingly being seen as integral components of the
corporate governance agenda. In many countries firms issuing
securities are required to publicly disclose their corporate
governance practices and comply with local guidelines on the
subject. A 2005 report by the international law firm Freshfields,
Bruckhaus and Deringer concluded that under the current legal
systems of many countries, directors might be in breach of their
fiduciary duties if they did not take into account environmental,
social and governance issues.
y
Bribery.CSR also stresses that firms should adopt responsible
practices wherever they operate. National laws making it illegal to
bribe foreign officials to obtain or retain business on the subject are
often based on the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery
of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions
and the 2003 UN Convention Against Corruption.
y Requirements under different jurisdictions.It is important to be
aware of the varying legal requirements of different countries. In the
U.K., for example, legislation requires pension fund trustees to
publish a comment in their investment statements on the extent to
which their investment policies address social, ethical and
environmental issues. As noted above, in European countries laws
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
21/47
require companies to report on their social and environmental
performance. In the U.S., a number of firms have been sued under
theAlien Tort Claims Act(e.g., Doe v. Unocal), which raises the
possibility that corporate liability could be established through
transnational civil litigation. The U.S. has also significantly revised
its corporate governance legislation in recent years, in particular,
passing the Sarbanes-Oxley Actin 2002 which establishes stricter
standards for all U.S. public company boards, management and
public accounting firms. At the United Nations, a Special
Representative on Business and Human Rights to the Secretary-
General was appointed in July 2005. The Special Representative is
expected to identify standards of corporate responsibility and
accountability, enhance understanding and recognition of these
standards, and issue recommendations on future United Nations
work regarding business and human rights issues.
Mention should also be made in this context of the many business codes of
conduct that exist. These codes, often developed by a specific industry sector,
are usually voluntary and not legally-binding. Nonetheless, they can be used in a
legally-binding manner in a contractual context (e.g., in a supply chain). Here,
various legal questions may arise, including in relation to whether national,
regional or international standards take precedence.
4 Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Rights
Human rights are relevant to the economic, social and environmental aspects of
corporate activity. For example, labor rights requiring companies to pay fair
wages affect the economicaspect. Human rights such as the right to non-
discrimination are relevant to the socialaspect. And the environmentalaspects of
corporate activity might affect a range of human rights, such as the right to clean
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
22/47
drinking water. So, while the primary responsibility for the enforcement of
international human rights standards lies with national governments, there is a
growing acceptance that corporations also have an important role to play.
Corporations impact on human rights in significant ways. These impacts have
increased over recent decades as the economic might and political influences of
corporations has grown, and as corporations have become more involved in
delivering services previously provided by governments.
Corporations have come to recognize that part of being a good corporate citizen
includes respecting the human rights of those who come into contact with the
corporation in some way. This might be direct contact (for example, employees
or customers), or indirect contact (for example, workers of suppliers, or people
living in areas affected by a corporations activities).
Corporations are also responding to the fact that many consumers and investors
expect corporations to act in a socially responsible manner. The extent to which
a company implements a comprehensive CSR program can influence consumer
and investor decisions.
4.1 Introduction
On the face of it, human rights and the company seem worlds apart, and like oil
and water, an impossible mix. But reality is proving otherwise. Every day brings
more tangible and visible evidence of how closely human rights and todays
enterprises are linked, the key perspective being corporate social responsibility
(CSR). Until recently, human rights were mostly thought to inhibit the domain of
rights and duties of states, never (compliance with law apart) the corporate
domain. Although currently gaining ground in theoretical debates and in the
practice of some companies, the issue is not really a new one. The mid-1970s
had seen a dawning realization of how company power was extending beyond
economic to political, cultural and social areas. Since then, the continuous
evolution of company activities and power seem to have radically restructured
the equilibrium of their relations with the state and society. Nowadays,
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
23/47
companies are among the most decisive actors in determining how human rights
are put into practice. Several working documents of UN commission on Human
Rights and UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human
Rights as well as Security Council resolution establish a close relationship
between the activities of some companies and Human Rights abuses. These
documents stress the fact that companies have very often applied the so called
downward harmonization which basically entails the selective adoption of the
employment and enviormental legislation offering the lowest international social,
enviormental and Human Rights standards. The documents also point out that
while companies may contribute to development by creating jobs, paying taxes
and transferring technology, they may also instigate structural violence, poor
working conditions and destruction of ecosystems, and in so doing effectively
become barriers to sustainable development of the least favored nations. As a
result, the above documents offer substantial input into the timeless debate
around company contributions to the right to development.
Today the traditional concept by which only states and individuals can be held
responsible for abuses of Human Rights is clearly being called into question by
civil society in general, in political circles and over the last decade, also by some
business managers. Indeed increasing number of companies are linking human
rights to their CSR strategy upstream as a basis for CSR screening (policy) and
downstream as a resource for CSR measurement and evaluation (practice).
What is being considered today is a new paradigm of the company in which
respect for minimum international human rights standards has become as issue
inextricably linked to the process of building a responsible company.
Social, political and economic actors no longer view companies as mere
suppliers of products and services but as new social, economic and
environmental actors in a globalized economy where production processes are
being closely examined. Nowadays, the question goes beyond environmental
and social quality concerns (CSR matters) and includes human rights issues.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
24/47
Organizations formerly operating within a legal framework are now aware of a
new frame of reference instigated by citizens and consumers. These days,
societys relationship with companies and their authorization to act is under
constant review, and currently extends to whether they violate Human Rights
within their area of influence. In effect companies are being required to build their
legitimacy and identity on the basis of respect for Human Rights, increasingly
seen an integral part of responsible 21st century businesses and business
leadership.
The crucial issue here is, however, is not only where Human Rights fit into CSR
strategies, but how this is happening and what present and future challenges to
expect. The process seems to start from within, when companies begin to
question why and how they should be managing this new field within its CSR
strategy. Here are some of these few questions:
y What is the general Human Rights context within which companies
are operating? In other words, what are the real trends on the
Human Rights agenda internationally and what are the new
challenges facing their protection and promotion?
y
In this context, why are Human Rights being included on companyagendas today? What are the main initiatives linking companies
with protection of Human Rights, turning it into the core value of
company CSR?
y What king of Human Rights are we talking about in the company
context? And what is the area of influence of companies in the field
of Human Rights?
y Finally, what are the issues still to be addressed on international
and corporate agendas that link Human Rights to business fields?
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
25/47
4.2 Human Rights on the CSR Agenda
Four basic trends can be identified as catalyses of the new Human Rights
presence in business discourses and practices and at top-level economic
forums.
y First the controversial process of economic globalization. In an unequal
world, globalization causes economies to resort increasingly to
internationalization and off-shoring, thus spreading productive processes
over countries with very different levels of Human Rights protection.
y
Second, the emerging network society. Under its rules, companies areperceived as not simply economic actors, but as playing their part along
with other social actors in interactions with their equivalents in other
fields.
y Third, Information and knowledge technologies which create
expectations of greater corporate transparency, while fast tracking and
multiplying content and information on these issues in local and global
interactions
y Fourth, the emerging risk society, by which company reputation, image
and identity are coming under scrutiny of certain rising values in a civil
society that is increasingly informed and mobilized on such issues. One
of a companys main assets, on a par with other more tangible assets
like product quality and technological innovations, is its reputation. It is
therefore in this context that our societies are calling on responsiblecompanies to build into their legitimacy, identity and responsibility a
respect for Human Rights.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
26/47
4.3 CSR and Human Rights: Main Initiatives
Beyond initiatives put forward by international organizations in the 80s and the
90s (such as the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work,
(ILO), the Tripartite Declaration on principles concerning Multinational
Enterprises and Social Policies (ILO)) all aimed at giving companies guidance on
the incorporation of Human Rights criteria into their strategies it ought to be
stressed that in recent years, new proposals on these same issues have been
consolidating in international, business and third sector circles. Guided by the
type of instruments featured in the report of European Commission, Mapping
Instruments for corporate social responsibility, here are the most significant
instruments in this area, including guidelines and statements of principles and
system of accreditation and accountability.
4.3.1 Principles of United Nations Global Compact
Human Rights:
y Principle1: Businesses should support and respect the protection
of internationally proclaimed human rights.
y Principle2: Businesses should support and respect the protection
of internationally proclaimed human rights.
Labour Standards:
y Principle3: Businesses should uphold the freedom of association
and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining;
y Principle4: the elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory
labour;
y Principle5: the effective abolition of child labour; and
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
27/47
y Principle6: the elimination of discrimination in respect of
employment and occupation.
Environment:
y Principle7: Businesses should support a precautionary approach
to environmental challenges;
y Principle8: undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental
responsibility; and
y Principle9: encourage the development and diffusion of
environmentally friendly technologies.
Anti-Corruption:
y Principle10: Businesses should work against corruption in all its
forms, including extortion and bribery.
Global compact therefore invites companies to:
y Support and respect the internationally proclaimed protection of
Human Rights within their sphere of influence.
y They are not complicit to Human Rights abuse; an issue that
carries at lot of weight as far as United Nations positions is
concerned.
According to the report Business and Human Rights: A progress report that
examines progress in the field of the Global Compact, companies who support
this initiative must:
y Respect local and international laws principles on Human Rights
spans both legal framework.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
28/47
y Satisfy consumer concerns, given recent allegations about activities
violating economic, social and cultural rights like labour rights.
y Promote the rule of law.
y Build community goodwill.
y Select partners, suppliers or subcontract companies according to
their respect for Human Rights.
y Explore Human Rights situations in the countries where they invest
so as not to interfere with international or European sanction
policies.
y Introduce and effectively apply social responsibility measures on
Human Rights.
Finally, Global Compact suggests that companies should follow a series of
practical steps for the integration of Human Rights into their corporate strategy.
y Identify issues relating to Human Rights that a company can and
must confront. This will vary considerably depending on the sector
and country in which they operate. The analysis of the impact of
business activities on Human Rights and their relationship must
help to define the corresponding policy and its implementation.
y Carry out a policy based on international instruments.
y Define mechanisms for implementation.
y Dialogue/Collaboration: For may companies, this is the first step
and consists of starting from a consensus between the different
actors involved, facilitating transparency in the process.
y
Train own and foreign staff on corporate principles on HumanRights issues.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
29/47
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
30/47
session of United Nations Human Rights Committee in2004. Main criteria established
by the norms:
y Corporations shall ensure that they have no negative impact on the
enjoyment of Human Rights in its widest sense.
y Corporations shall establish internal mechanisms that ensure
compliance with Human Rights.
y Corporations shall submit to independent monitoring.
y Corporations shall ensure non-discriminatory practices.
y Corporations shall not benefit from contexts where International
Humanitarian Right is violated.
y Corporations shall respect labour rights.
y Corporations shall maintain fair marketing practices.
y Corporations shall respect the environment and contribute to
sustainable development.
4.3.3 OECD Guidelines ForMultinational Enterprises
The OECD guidelines are voluntary recommendations addressed by government
to multinational corporations operating in or from adhering countries. These
guidelines form part of the OECD Declaration on International Investment and
multinational enterprises adopted in 1976 to facilitate direct investments in its
member states. They provide voluntary principles and standards for responsible
business conduct, forming the first multilateral initiative taken by several
governments in the corporate Human Rights field. The 2000 review of the
Guidelines recommends observance of the Guidelines by enterprise wherever
they operate, even outside the OECD area.
Areas dealt with in the guidelines are:
y Labour and industrial relations
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
31/47
y Human Rights and Enviroment
y Information disclosure
y Competition, taxation,
y Science and Technology.
4.3.4 Amnesty International
AI is pursuing the social responsibility strategy by trying to convince MNCs to
voluntarily adopt human rights principles and policies in their own codes. AI does not
call for economic sanctions against countries nor boycotts againstcompanies. AI takes
no position on the legitimacy of economic relations between companies and
governments guilty of human rights violations.
AI may in some cases oppose specific transfers of equipment, training or other support
used to commit human rights violations.
AIs Human rights principles1
Company human rights policy based on Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR).
y Security arrangements must not permit Human Rights Violations (HRVs).
y Community engagement.
y Freedom from discrimination.
y Freedom from forced labour.
y Health and safety.
y Right to association and collective bargaining.
y Fair working conditions (adequate standard of living).
y Elimination of child labour (as lawfully required).
y Independent monitoring and transparency.
1www.amnesty.org.uk/business; www.iblf.org/humanrights; www.business-humanrights.org.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
32/47
4.3.4 Global Reporting Initiative
It is a voluntary, long-term, multi-stakeholder international guideline for sustainability
reporting. GRI addresses Economic, Environmental, and Social dimensions of
Business.
y Economic: wages and benefits, labour productivity, job creation, expenditures
on R&D, investment in training.
y Environmental: impacts of processes, products and services on air, land,
water, biodiversity, and human health.
y Social: workplace health and safety, employee retention, labour rights, human
rights, working conditions.
y
GRI Features Comprehensive reporting guideline applicable to almost all businesses.
Improves transparency with stakeholders.
Supports consultation with key stakeholders.
Allows for incremental implementation.
Provides a management tool to help evaluate and continuously improve
business operations.
Common format allows comparisons and illuminates relationships among
core elements.
Supports independent verification, but does not provide it.
5 CSR and Human Rights in India
5.1 Example : Land Rights, Entitlements and CSR
Land is one of the most scarce of the natural resources. It has been subject to
ownership laws and property regimes for centuries. Yet the enforcement of these
laws leaves much to be desired. The paper cites the real problems that stem
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
33/47
from the denial of these basic human rights from the perspective of Corporate
Social Responsibility and suggests how corporates can help.
One of the basic assumptions related to land entitlements is that there is
increased efficiency of resource use, facilitation of development, protection of de
facto rights, and equity in distribution.
If one goes into the history of evolution of laws related to land entitlement, one
finds that during the British period, land was allocated to the highest bidders.
These high revenue providers were allocated large chunks of land and so the
system of landlords was brought into existence.
Post Independence, there were various movements to promote the equitable
distribution of land. The Bhoodan (land gifts collected under the Land Ceiling Act)
movement forced big landlords to donate their lands that were then distributed to
the landless farmers. In India, there is a general perception that land reform has
led to insignificant changes. Distribution of land is unequal, and only a couple of
states have made progress in redistributing land. Rapid agricultural growth and
all-round development of the rural sector largely depends on the implementation
of land reforms, which is missing in India. The rural poor, most of who are
landless or have very small holdings are caught in the trap of debt and starvation.
India, at present, finds itself in the midst of a paradoxical situation: On the one
hand there are record food grain stocks and on the other hand, over 200 million
Indians are underfed and millions are undernourished. The reason is that most of
the farming population has marginal land holdings or no land holding at all.
Efficiencies of production are alien to them; and their high dependence on the
monsoons and use of ineffective/unsustainable methods of agriculture makes
them more vulnerable. Problems of land alienation, loss of land
rights/entitlement, improper land management and use, unsustainable agriculture
and deforestation all add to the woes of the people.
Land resources are limited and very important for prosperity and dignified living.
It is the right of all human beings to have entitlement to land productive land. In
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
34/47
Tarapur Taluka, IGSSS supports a project for the rights of the Valmikis (manual
scavengers). In Changla village these Dalits were denied grazing land, for their
cattle, by the Panchayat (specifically the upper caste darbars). The Dalits, who
had formed a Sangathan, were threatened with woeful consequences if they
continued to press their demands. With the support of the voluntary organisations
working for them, the Valmikis filed a complaint under the Prevention of Atrocities
Act. The accused were arrested and locked up in jail for two days a strong
lesson was learnt. The Panchayat was forced to allot 30 acres of grazing land to
the dalits.
In Sabarkantha district, Gujarat, construction work began on a water reservoir
(Hathmati Jalasaya) in 1958. Due to this 12 villages were brought under
submerged area forcing the landlords and their workers to move. When 10,000
acres of land went for the dam, 5000 acres of land was given to the original
landlords as compensation. According to the landholding regulations, these
landlords were entitled only to 1500 acres. Our project partner organised the
landless labourers and ensured that they harvested the crop from the remaining
3500 acres. Securing the communities title to this land is important to ensure
continued access to this natural resource.
However, these cases are few and far between. The systematic deprivation of
the poor from land entitlement is a pertinent issue in India. Rural poverty in India is
related to the lack of access to cultivable land or its low productivity. The World Bank
Report, India: Achievements and Challenges in Reducing Poverty (A World Bank
Country Study 1997), reported that landlessness is by far the greatest predictor of
poverty in Indiaeven more so than caste or illiteracy.More than 250 million rural
residents live in households that own less than 0.2 hectares of land. Access to
productive land will free these households from the clutches of poverty and hunger.
However, land policy and the legislative and administrative framework in India present
substantial obstacles to gaining greater land access and rights. Apart from the
administrative, policy and implementation issues concerning land entitlement, the past
few years have seen the rise of a new entity the Corporate, who competes for the
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
35/47
same natural resources (land) that the government, rich landowners/mafia and the
actual owners/title holders do.
5.1.1 Role of Corporate
The onset of globalization and the opening up of the world markets meant that
now there were more demands on resources. Indias liberalization policy and open
market reforms meant on the one hand a growth opportunity and on the other a cause
for greater marginalization of the poor.
The so called development projects like setting up of industries, mines, dams,
and shopping malls have induced large scale displacement not only in India, but also all
over the world. Thousands of acres of land have been taken away, in the name of
development, from people who are totally dependent on it for their livelihood.
Rehabilitation plans (on paper) are shown to the displaced people. Policies are
there to provide agricultural land or replace the livelihoods of those displaced by large
projects. However, these policies are meant to ensure the large-scale transfer of lands
to private companies and corporate bodies. The policies are the means to legitimize
this resource alienation and to strengthen corporate control over land.
While the policy grapples with and articulates these most germane issues of the
displacement and rehabilitation process, it does not provide any appropriate mechanism
or framework for either the assessment of the necessity of displacement, or the
identification or compensation of the ousted with livelihoods. What is the reality of the
compensation framework? Does it ensure that the ousted will actually receive
agricultural land? Or is the concern about the non-viability of cash
as a compensation instrument merely rhetorical?
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
36/47
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
37/47
and confidence need to be built between the community and the corporate to establish
a base for future partnership.
In understanding this, today corporates have started to move into playing a
greater role in society. This may be attributed to external factors like mounting pressure
from their own stakeholders, society and the government on responsible business
practices or may also have arisen from an introspection of the returns that their
business gives to those it takes from. Whatever the drivers, there is no denying the fact
that there is a greater initiative in Corporate Social Respons ibility than there was a few
decades ago.
5.2 Example : CSR & Human rights in India: Indian Oil
We cite the example of flagship petroleum refiner IndianOil Corporation Ltd2, a Central
Public Sector enterprise of Mahanavratna Status. At IndianOil, corporate social
responsibility (CSR) has been the cornerstone of success right from inception in the
year 1964. The Corporations objectives in this key performance area are enshrined in
its Mission statement: "to help enrich the quality of life of the community and preserve
ecological balance and heritage through a strong environment conscience."
IndianOil has set core values as Care, Innovation, Passion and Trust to guide in all
their activities. They take pride in being able to claim that all countrymen are their
customers. Public corporations like IndianOil are essentially organs of society deploying
significant public resources. They strive to work as wholesome entities created for the
good of the society and for improving the quality of life of the communities we serve.
As a constructive partner in the communities in which it operates, IndianOil has been
taking concrete action to realize its social responsibility objectives, thereby buildingvalue for its shareholders and customers. The Corporation respects human rights,
values its employees, and invests in innovative technologies and solutions for
sustainable energy flow and economic growth. In the past five decades, IndianOil has
supported innumerable social and community initiatives in India. Touching the lives of
2 http://www.iocl.com/Aboutus/corporatesocialresponsibility.aspx
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
38/47
millions of people positively by supporting environmental and health-care projects and
social, cultural and educational programmes.
Besides focusing primarily on the welfare of economically and socially deprived sections
of society, IndianOil also aims at developing techno-economically viable and
environment-friendly products & services for the benefit of millions of its consumers,
while at the same time ensuring the highest standards of safety and environment
protection in its operations.
Sharing Profits
Every year, IndianOil sets aside a fixed portion of its profits for spreading smiles in
millions of lives across the country through a comprehensive community welfare and
development programme. About one-fourth of the community development funds are
spent on the welfare of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe beneficiaries.
IndianOil has a concerted social responsibility programme to partner communities in
health, family welfare, education, environment protection, providing potable water,
sanitation, and empowerment of women and other marginalised groups. IndianOil has
always been in the forefront in times of national emergencies. IndianOil People have
time and again rallied to help victims of natural calamities, maintaining uninterrupted
supply of petroleum products and contributing to relief and rehabilitation measures in
cash and kind.
IndianOils community-focused initiatives include allotment of petrol/diesel station
dealerships and LPG distributorships to beneficiaries from among Scheduled Castes,
Scheduled Tribes, physically handicapped, ex-servicemen, war widows, etc. The
Corporation has also unveiled kisan seva kendras as small-format retail outlets to reach
quality products and services to people in the rural areas. IndianOil has also set up the
IndianOil Foundation (IOF) as a non-profit trust to protect, preserve and promote
national heritage monuments. The Corporation also supports a variety of endeavours in
arts, culture, music and dance, apart from organising programmes on its own under the
banners of IndianOil Art Exhibition, IndianOil Sangeet Sabha and IndianOil Kavi
Sammelan.
As part of its environment-protection initiatives, IndianOil has invested close to Rs.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
39/47
7,000 crore in state-of-the-art technologies at its refineries for production of green fuels
meeting global standards. To further reduce dependence on precious petroleum
products and secure the nations energy security, the Corporation is now in the process
of commercialising various options in alternative fuels such as ethanol-blended petrol,
biodiesel, and Hydrogen and Hydrogen-CNG mixture.
With safety, health and environment protection high on its corporate agenda, IndianOil
is committed to conducting business with a strong environment conscience, so as to
ensure sustainable development, safe work places and enrichment of the quality of life
of its employees, customers and the community. IndianOil is also committed to the
Global Compact Programme of the United Nations and endeavours to abide by the 10
principles of the programme, some of which are already part of the Corporations Vision
and Mission statements. It is the firm resolve of IndianOil People to move beyond
business, touch every heart and fuel a billion dreams.
In India, traditionally business is seen as legitimate, integral part of society with inherent
Vedic philosophy Sarva Loka Hitam the well being of all stakeholders along with
business excellence. Today most of our big business houses like TATA, BIRLA,
RELIANCE, etc and CPSEs, SPSEs all have taken CSR as part of their mission.
However, this has to be further inculcated up to bottom level of their day to day working.
This can be achieved through regular training and incentives to all involved. As ex-prime
minister Late Shri Rajiv Gandhi in one of his rallies stated that if Rs 100/- is sent, only
Rs 15/- reaches up to the needy. The main stress shall be on accountability of
distribution of Public Goods whether food items through Public Distribution System or
money through various YOJNAs like NREGA, Gramin Sadak Vikas etc. Rapid
implementation of UID scheme may help in rooting out this problem. The education and
health system shall also be revamped as they are becoming very costly day by day,
making them out of reach of our majority of population. Schools like KVS, NVS, etc shallbe leveraged in standard of education and facilities to make them at par with private
schools. Government Hospitals services are to be made at par with Private Hospitals.
Also, these entities should be discouraged for making them money churning house at
the cost of exorbitant fees.Infrastructure like, roads, railways, irrigation, housings all
need a CSR perspective while planning and implementation. All things said and done
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
40/47
can only bear their desired fruits, if the population is kept under control. At 120 crores
today, and further increasing at a rate higher than world rate, it has to be given foremost
weightage. In light of the above arguments in favour of CSR, and its benefits, attempts
should be made to mandate CSR, or else, the people would be deprived of a whole new
forum of ensuring poverty reduction and social development, apart from the
government. In this way, the government and the corporate can work hand in hand,
both assuming their duties and responsibilities while realising rights of the people. Thus
CSR exhorts firms to diverge from their sole aim of maximising profits and to lay more
importance on improving the economic and social standards of the community in their
countries of operation.
6 Role of Judiciary- Contribution of Supreme Court / High Courts
CSR issues cannot be put before Judiciary as it is not mandated through any legislation.
However, it is the role of the judiciary to interpret the law in the socio-economic and
political context in which it is meant to be interpreted. Further, the judiciary recognised
the civil and political rights by broadening locus standi, making the judiciary more
accessible. The responsible role played by the judiciary in terms of judicial activism, by
recognising CSR, as long back as in 19833. However, the legislature has still not given
effect to it in terms of any statutory standing, even though the judiciary, by recognising
CSR, has actually supplemented the burden of the government, with that of the
corporates, which could have ended up in division of responsibilities of the government.
Also, through Public Interest Litigations (PILs) any citizen in India can raise an issue
concerning Human Rights which in his / her view is not upheld by any business entity.
Some examples are Uphaar Cinema Fire Incidence, Bhopal Gas Leakage Case and
excessive use of groundwater by Coca Cola in Kerala. All these cases when put up for
judgment, have a CSR angle as the culprit company is considered to not uphold their
responsibilities.
3 AIR 1983 SC 759, where it was held by the Apex Court that the traditional view that a company is the property of the shareholders
is an exploded myth. According to the new socio-economic thinking, a company is a social institution having duties and
responsibilities towards the community in which it functions. Also, it is agreed that if a company has caused some loss to itssurrounding areas, it is its obligation to make up for that loss, whether technical or environmental, as a part of its CSR. Also, refer topara 4 in MANU/SC0025/1982, where Justice P.N. Bhagwati refers to this as the new Corporate Philosophy, and also attracts theDirective Principles of State Policy, and their furtherance with the help of such corporates.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
41/47
Till now, redressal is available only against the actions of the government. If CSR is
mandated, there would be a more effective redressal forum in the form of the judiciary,
in case of failure on the part of corporates, apart from the current accountability forum,
i.e. the media. Further, even the UN Norms seek to impose responsibilities on
businesses within their respective spheres of activity and influence.
7 Role of NGOs/Civil Society Groups and Business / Industry Associations
and other stake holders
Non Government Organisations (NGOs) are private voluntary organizations (PVOs) that
represent social movements. They function as moral entrepreneurs that are selling
ethical ideals and standards for no-profit and no-loss. They vary greatly in size, mission,
strategies and degree of democratic legitimacy.
NGO Strategies and Tactics for Promoting CSR are
y Research and Reporting media exposure
y Social Responsibility dialogue with Trans National Corporations (TNCs)
y Social Accountability standards and audits
y Shareholder Activism shareholder resolutions
y
Economic Pressure boycottsy Sanctions/Divestment selective purchasing
y Government Regulation supporting legislation
y Litigation bringing law suits.
y Norm Creation development of international law
NGOs can play the role of mediator between Corporate Businesses and civil society by:
Understanding need to address demands from civil society as a responsible dialogue
partnerswho can represent civil society interests.
y NGOs have relevant expertise to assist TNCs in country risk assessments and
social auditing programs.
y Provide guidance about social standards and social auditing.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
42/47
y protecting TNCs reputation and public criticism.
NGOs are also interested to co-ordinate with Transnational Corporations due to
y shift of power in the Post Cold-War world towards TNCs and economic issues.
y Perceived lack of social and environmental accountability of TNCs under existing
laws.
y Internal critique of the human rights movement for being too Northern and too
focused on traditional civil and political rights.
y Desire to find new allies in the on-going struggle for human rights and dignity for
all people.
Civil Society Groups
Ethical banks excel in community involvement, as do other financial institutions such as
credit unions. Community involvement is not limited to ethical banks as conventional
banks also partake in such actions. The following are a few examples of community
involvement done by ethical banks, credit unions, and conventional banks:
y Affordable housing projects
y Many banks/credit unions try to increase financial literacy in the communityy Give local scholarships & sponsorships.
y Financially support community events
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) also emphasizes CSR of businesses.
8 Conclusion and Suggestions
Corporate social responsibility is most frequently used to describe a company's relationswith its wider community. CSR is on the boundary of HR and PR. There are dangers for
companies and for the HR function if it is allowed to slide too far towards PR. More than
excessive use of relationship management techniques they should make use of
strategic relationship management approaches. This strategic relationship management
approaches includes the relationship development, maintenance and separation factors.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
43/47
After the goal attainment the HR managers should be able to separate themselves from
the community and Non Governmental Organisations and lead them to new
interventions and action programmes where the organisations development and Social
Development can be better integrated. If HR managers are not orienting and
experimenting them with innovative areas the Human Resource Management don't
have better role in the industrial sector. HR has a role in demonstrating the benefits of
workplace practices that both reflect CSR and at the same time, contribute to
organizational efficiency and success.
The Business Case for CSR
y Enhances compliance with local and international laws.
y Benefits from promotion of rule of law.
y Better internal control and control over supply chain.
y Protection of reputation and brand image.
y Enhances risk management.
y Increases worker productivity, morale, and loyalty.
y Provides management tools.
y Addresses shareholder concerns.
y Builds community goodwill.
y Applies corporate values.
y Reduces operating costs.
y Enhances financial performance.
y Increases stock value.
y Enhanced ability to attract quality workforce.
y Improves business relationships.
Push Factors
y Globalization of production.
y Privatization of state-owned industries in some cases.
y Communications and IT.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
44/47
y Calls for greater corporate transparency.
y Threats of trade sanctions, boycotts and divestment campaigns.
y Threats of negative publicity and damage to reputation.
y Desire to address concerns of consumers and active shareholders.
y Desire to address concerns of NGOs, Trade Unions, and Faith-Based
organizations.
y Desire to address concerns of local communities.
y Desire to respond to CSR initiatives by governments.
y Desire to keep up with industry leaders in CSR.
Next Steps for Companies
y Companies should adopt strong CSR policies.
y Companies should commit to creating internal management systems to monitor
compliance.
y Companies should seek to achieve external certification through auditing
systems such as SA8000.
y Companies can cooperate with local NGOs and community groups in identifying
issues, assisting internal and external auditors, and solving problems.
y Companies need to be more transparent about what they are actually doing in
the field of CSR.
The Way Forward
y More companies must get past Why should we? to How can we? Dont wait to
be shamed for bad practices.
y More NGOs need to loose their anti-business biases and begin to distinguish
among different companies.y Companies need to begin to think about CSR compliance as a normal part of the
cost of doing business, and as providing a competitive advantage.
y NGOs need to begin thinking of companies as potential allies and partners rather
than as adversaries.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
45/47
y Ultimately, governments will need to create and enforce CSR standards
internationally.
9 Our Views regarding relevance of project for a business manager and
entrepreneur
This project may help a business manager / entrepreneur to understand importance of
his/ her CSR.
Role of Human Resource Managers
If Non Governmental Organizations can play better role in the corporate social
responsibility, then Human Resource Management Department of the industry can play
better role in linking industry with community. The HR managers shall take lead in the
effort to link between community and the industry. To develop better rapport with the
people, HR managers have to make use of their Strategic Relationship Management
Skills. They should interact with the community by establishing better linkage with the
Non Governmental Organisations Working there in the locality. The HR managers can
initially conduct Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with the community and community
leaders with the help of Non Governmental Organisations and need evaluation and
need prioritization should be conducted. Here HR managers can act as facilitators in
the Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives. The community may have unlimited
social needs. It is the responsibility of the HR managers to intervene into those needs
and give a realistic perception to the community members related to their unlimited
andunrealistic needs. The needs of the community are to be segregated into important
and important needs. Both short-term goals and long-term goals are to be segregated.
The discussion to be entertained and the need categorization and finalization should
come from the community itself. The HR managers who act as the implied leaders
should lead the community towards realistic goal perception that integrate the goals and
objectives of Corporate Social Responsibility programme initiated by the organization.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
46/47
This indicates that as leaders of the Corporate Social Responsibility programme, HR
managers should integrate the needs of the community and that of the organisation.
The list of social development needs and the environmental protection needs to be
discussed soon after the Focus Group Discussions, with the top management in order
to ascertain whether all those needs can be met with the budget allotment for the
developmental programs. A multi level discussion, with members of the NGO's, HR
managers and representative of the Top Management, is to be initiated for the
finalization of the social intervention programme. Corporate Social Responsibility offers
the HR community opportunities to demonstrate its strategic focus. The relationship with
the community and Non Governmental Organisations indicates the level of HR
manager's success role in the Corporate Social Responsibility effort.
10 Reference
http://www.csreurope.org CSR Europe is a business-driven membership network. Its
mission is to help companies achieve profitability sustainable growth and human
progress by placing corporate social responsibility in the mainstream of business
practice.
http://www.csrwire.com - CSRwire seeks to promote the growth of corporate
responsibility and sustainability through solutions-based information and positive
examples of corporate practices.
http://www.bsr.org - Business for Social Responsibility (BSR) is a global organisation
that helps member companies achieve success in ways that respect ethical values,
people, communities and the environment.
http://www.business-humanrights.org - Business & Human Rights Resource Centre is a
charity promoting greater awareness and informed discussion of important policy
issues.
http://www.unglobalcompact.org - the Global Compact seeks to advance responsible
corporate citizenship so that business can be part of the solution to the challenges of
globalisation.
8/7/2019 LAM_Project_Report Group 6 Section B
47/47
http://www.ilo.org This is the website of the International Labour Organisation.
http://www.hrw.org - Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of
people around the world.
http://www.goodmoney.com This website provides information on Social, Ethical and
Environmental Investing and Consuming & Corporate Accountability.
http://www.inform.umd.edu/crge/resources/interest.htm This is an association of
academic units and individual faculty on the University of Maryland Campus whose
mission is to promote, advance, and conduct, research, scholarship, and faculty
development that examines the intersections of race, gender, and ethnicity with other
dimensions of difference.
http://www.international-alert.org - International Alert is an NGO committed to the
peaceful transformation of violent conflict
http://www.iocl.com/Aboutus/corporatesocialresponsibility.aspx
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/articles/Corporate-social-responsibility-in-a-Strategic-
Methodology-3316.asp
http://www.caclubindia.com/forum/corporate-social-responsibility-voluntary-guidelines-
2009-98392.asp
http://www.caclubindia.com/forum/corporate-social-responsibility-voluntary-guidelines-
2009-98392.asp
http://www.chillibreeze.com/articles_various/CSR-in-India.asp
Top Related