Justin BarnesN.C. Solar Center
N.C. State University
ASES 2009 Buffalo, New York
May 13, 2009
U.S. Photovoltaic Markets:
PV Policies Leading the Way
The DSIRE ProjectDatabase of State Incentives for Renewables &
Efficiency• Created in 1995• Funded by U.S. DOE• Managed by NCSU;
works closely with IREC• Project Scope: policies/programs
that promote RE/EE• Breakdown of Data:
~2,000 total records~850 solar records~770 PV records
www.dsireusa.org
DSIRE SOLAR!!• Interactive Policy Map: Provides quick access to state specific solar information
• Solar Policy Guide: Offers descriptions of various state and local policy types for promoting solar; status and trends of individual policies; specific policy examples; and links to additional resources
• Summary Maps: Provide a geographical overview of incentives across the country
• Solar Policy Comparison Tables: Highlight individual elements of state rebate and tax credit programs
• Search Function: Allows users to create a custom list of programs by solar technology, incentive type, eligible sector, or other criteria.
Leading Policy Approaches Financial Incentives Solar Portfolio Standards Simplified Grid Connection Net Metering
Coordinated Policies for Sustainable Markets
Rate Design & Revenue Policies REC/SREC Market Access Third-party Ownership (i.e., legality of
PPA’s) Solar Access Laws Industry Recruitment & Support Solar in Public Buildings Workforce Development Local Codes & Standards Education & Marketing
i.e., Three of the Solar Alliance “Four Pillars of
Solar”
State Financial Incentives for PV
ASES 2008 ASES 2009
• Direct Incentives 25 29 Rebates GrantsProduction Incentives
• Tax Credits & Deductions 22 23• Low-Interest Loans 23 24 • Sales Tax Exemptions 18 21 • Property Tax Incentives 26 29
# of states
Varies by project
$10K - $50K
10-20% up to $75K
$60K - $1M
$2K - $10K
50% up to $10K
Direct Incentives for PV, 1997www.dsireusa.org
State Rebates & PBIs for PVwww.dsireusa.org May 2009
• 20 state rebate (+ DC) program & PBIs*
• 26 state grant programs (not shown on map)
• 31 non-state PBIs (not shown on map)
• 77 utility rebate programs (not shown on map)
DE: ≤35%
$4/W
VT: $1.75-3.50/W
MD: $2.50/W
$2-2.25/W
50%, $3k max
≤35%
30%
NY: $2-5/W
$2-3/W
≤$3.50/W
$2.30-4.60/W
ME: $2K max
NH: $3/W
NJ: $1-1.75/WSRECs:
~$0.46/kWh
CT: $2.50-4/W
MA: $1-4.40/W
* Includes RPS-inspired utility rebate programs in AZ, CO & NV
15 - 54¢/kWh
$1-2.25/W
≤$3.25/W
≤50¢/kWh, 5 yrs.
DC: $1-3/W
(R) Residential; (C) Commercial; (NR) Non-Residential
State Tax Incentives for PV
•Credits in 18 states + P.R.
•Range: 10% - 75%
•FL, IA, MD, OK have small PTCs
(not shown on map)
www.dsireusa.org May 2009
35%
10% (Non-Corp.)
~2.7¢/kWh 10 yrs. (C)
$3/W (R)50% (C)
10% (NR)25% (R)
25% (R) MA: 15% (R)
15%
35%
100% Deduct.
(R)
25% (R)10% (C)
50%
RI: 25%
25%
VT: 30% (C)
35%
$500 (R)
$1K (C)
35%
P.R.: 75%
10% Deduct. (C)
Stable, long-term incentive, declining over time
Reasonably easy application process
Administrative flexibility to modify program
Cost-effective quality assurance mechanism
Track program usage details and share data
Partnerships with banks, installers, nonprofits
Education & outreach
Financial Incentives: Best Practices
RPS Policies with Solar/DG Provisions
State renewable portfolio standard with solar / distributed generation (DG) provision
State renewable portfolio goal with solar / distributed generation provision
www.dsireusa.org / May 2009
Solar water heating counts toward solar provision
WA: double credit for DG
NV: 1% solar by 2015;
2.4 to 2.45 multiplier for PV
UT: 2.4 multiplierfor solar
AZ: 4.5% DG by 2025
NM: 4% solar-electric by 2020
0.6% DG by 2020
TX: double credit for non-wind
(Non-wind goal: 500 MW)
CO: 0.8% solar-electric by 2020
MO: 0.3% solar-electric by 2021
MI: triple credit for solar
OH: 0.5% solar
by 2025
NC: 0.2% solar
by 2018
MD: 2% solar-electric in 2022 DC: 0.4% solar by 2020; 1.1 multiplier for solar
NY: 0.1542% customer-sitedby 2013
DE: 2.005% solar PV by 2019;
triple credit for PV
NH: 0.3% solar-electric by 2014
NJ: 2.12% solar-electric by 2021PA: 0.5% solar PV by 2020
MA: TBD
14 states &
DC have an RPS with
solar/DG provisions
Source: LBNL Environmental Energy Technologies Division / Energy Analysis Department
Largest RPS Markets for Solar (2009): AZ, NJ, NV, and CO
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Cu
mu
lati
ve S
ola
r C
apac
ity
(MW
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
An
nu
al S
ola
r A
dd
itio
ns
(MW
)
AZ
NJ
MD
OH
PA
NM
NC
MO
DE
NV
CO
DC
NH
NY
Annual Capacity (right axis)
Cumulative Capacity (left axis)
Establish an explicit solar set-aside in the RPS that ramps up over time.
Develop a mechanism for tracking, verifying and trading solar renewable energy certificates (SRECs) (e.g., NJ – Transparent SREC trading platform)
Impose a monetary penalty or include an alternative compliance payment provision for electricity suppliers that do not meet solar generation requirements (e.g., PA – ACP 200% SREC market value)
Require long-term power-purchase or SREC contracts to ensure project developers can access financing (e.g., MD – Requires 15-year contracts, up-front payment for 10 kW or less)
Encourage small-scale, distributed systems (e.g., AZ – 4.5% DG carve out with 50% for residential)
Promoting Solar through RPS Policies
• Allows customers to store any excess electricity generated, usually in the form of a kWh credit, on the grid for later use.
• Available “statewide” in 40 states. State policies vary dramatically.
Net Metering
Freeing the Grid 2008: www.newenergychoices.org
IREC model: www.irecusa.org/index.php?id=88
Net Metering
State policy
Voluntary utility program(s) only
www.dsireusa.org / May 2009
*State policy applies to certain utility types only (e.g., investor-owned utilities)
WA: 100
OR: 25/2,000*
CA: 1,000*
MT: 50*
NV: 1,000*
UT: 25/2,000*
AZ: no limit*
ND: 100*
NM: 80,000*
WY: 25*
HI: 100KIUC: 50
CO: 2,000co-ops & munis:
10/25
OK: 100*
MN: 40
LA: 25/300
AR: 25/300
MI: 20*
WI: 20*
MO: 100
IA: 500* IN: 10*
IL: 40*
FL: 2,000*
KY: 30*
OH: no limit*
GA: 10/100
WV: 25
NC: 1,000*
ME: 100
VT: 250
VA: 20/500*
NH: 100
MA: 60/1,000/2,000*
RI: 1,650/2,250/3,500*
CT: 2,000*
NY: 25/500/2,000*
PA: 50/3,000/5,000*
NJ: 2,000*
DE: 25/500/2,000*
MD: 2,000
DC: 1,000
40 states &
DC have adopted a
net metering policyNote: Numbers indicate system capacity limit in kW. Some state limits vary by customer type, technology and/or system application. Other limits might also apply.
Net Metering: Best Practices
Maximum system capacity ≥ 2 MW All renewables eligible All utilities must participate All customer classes eligible Limit on aggregate capacity ≥ 5% Annual reconciliation of NEG, or no expiration No application fee No special charges, fees or tariff change Customer owns RECs
Interconnection Standards
Freeing the Grid 2008: www.newenergychoices.org
• Technical issues include safety, power quality, system impacts. Technical issues largely resolved.• Policy issues include legal and procedural considerations. State approaches vary widely.
IREC model: www.irecusa.org/index.php?id=88
Interconnection Standards
State policy
www.dsireusa.org / May 2009
*Standard only applies to net-metered systems
WA: 20,000
OR: 25/2,000*
CA: no limit
MT: 50*
NV: 20,000
UT: 25/2,000*
NM: 80,000
WY: 25*
HI: no limit
CO: 10,000
MN: 10,000
LA: 25/300*
AR: 25/300*
MI: no limit
WI: 15,000
MO: 100*
IN: no limit
IL: 10,000
FL: 2,000*
KY: 30*
OH: 20,000
NC: no limit
VT: no limit
NH: 100*
MA: no limit
35 states + DC & PR
have adopted an interconnection
policy
Notes: Numbers indicate system capacity limit in kW. Some state limits vary by customer type (e.g., residential/non-residential).“No limit” means that there is no stated maximum size for individual systems. Other limits may apply. Generally, state interconnection standards apply only to investor-owned utilities.
CT: 20,000
PA: no limit
NJ: 2,000*
DC: 10,000
MD: 10,000
NY: 2,000
VA: 10/500*
SC: 20/100*
GA: 10/100*
PR: no limit
DE: varies*
TX: 10,000
Interconnection Standards: Best Practices
Establish state-wide policies that are uniform, transparent, detailed, and public
Set fees and technical requirements proportional to a project’s size
Process applications quickly; set timetable
Standardize and simplify forms
No redundant safety requirements – external disconnect switch
No additional insurance requirements for small systems
The “Whole” Picture
State Rebate/PBI
Tax Incenti
ve Solar/DG RPSInterconnection
(+C)Net Metering
(+B) Total
1 Massachusetts 1 1 1 1 1 5
2 Arizona 1 1 1 1 1 5
3 New York 1 1 1 1 1 5
4 Colorado 1 0 1 1 1 4
5 Maryland 1 0 1 1 1 4
6 New Jersey 1 0 1 1 1 4
7 Oregon 1 1 0 1 1 4
8 Pennsylvania 0 1 1 1 1 4
9 Nevada 1 0 1 1 1 4
10 Vermont 1 1 0 1 1 4
11 New Mexico 0 1 1 1 1 4
12 California 1 0 0.5 1 1 3.5
13 Illinois 1 0 0 1 1 3
14 Delaware 1 0 1 0 1 3
15 Texas 0 1 0.5 1 0 2.5
Utility Revenue Policies & Rate Design
Utility Revenue Policy Many states implementing or considering decoupling Remove disincentive for EE and DG, by removing the
link between electricity sales and profits. Reward utilities for achieving specific EE/DG targets
Electricity Rate Design Minimize Fixed Monthly Charges & Demand
Charges Develop Time-of-Use Energy Rates Give Customers Rate Choice
Third-Party Ownership/PPA Model Third-party ownership allows a site owner to install PV, but avoid typical
problems of: - high up-front costs
- lack of adequate tax liability (e.g., government buildings)- need to finance, build, and maintain system
BUT… Issues related to the regulation of “public utilities” and traditional utility
monopoly rights can pose problems in otherwise favorable markets.- The Oregon PUC has ruled that solar and wind providers cannot
be considered public utilities AND determined that they are not subject to PUC regulation as “electric service suppliers”.
Net metering regulations that imply that the net metering customer and the system owner are the same “person” may also inhibit adoption.
- The Michigan PSC revised its proposed net metering rules in response to comments during the rulemaking process, replacing the word “owns” with “uses” in the definition “customer-generator”.
Solar Access Laws• 17 states limit or prohibit restrictions that neighborhood covenants and/or local ordinances may impose on the use of solar-energy systems.
• Solar easements (31 states) allow for the rights to existing solar access on the part of one property owner to be secured from another property owner whose property could be developed in such a way as to restrict the solar resource. Transferred with property title.
• 14 states have provisions for both types of policy.
Example Contents* Apply law to a comprehensive list of instruments. [Hawaii - deeds, covenant, lease, restriction, and others; provides that “no person shall be prevented…from installing a solar energy device…”] Define the type of solar energy equipment protected by the law [New Mexico – includes solar electric, solar thermal, passive solar construction, etc.] Define the types of structures covered by the law [California – applies to both residential and commercial structures] Provide for enforcement outside of the legal system [New Jersey – law may be enforced by Department of Community Affairs, possibly avoiding the need for litigation] Award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to prevailing party in civil action arising from disputes
with HOAs. [Arizona]*See A Comprehensive Review of Solar Access Law in the United States (http://www.solarabcs.org/solaraccess/Solaraccess-full.pdf) by Colleen Kettles.
DC
Solar Easements Provision Solar Rights Provision Solar Easements and Solar Rights Provisions
Tax Credits • OR - 50% of the construction costs of facility for manufacturing RE equipment• NM - 5% of the cost alternative energy manufacturing equipment
Loans/Loan Guarantees• PA – $35,000 per job created within 3 years at 5% interest rate (April 2009). Also
offers option of a loan guarantee of up to $30 M structured as a grant to be used in the event of a default.
• NJ – Loans for up to $3 M at 0% interest over 10 years for Class I renewables to assist them in becoming competitive with traditional generation (grants also available)
Grants• NYSERDA Manufacturing & Incentive Program - facility/site characterization; pre-
production development; and incentive payment based on product sales. $1.5M/project; $10M for program through 2011
Property Tax Abatement • MT - new RE production facilities, new RE mfg. facilities, and RE R&D assessed at
50% of taxable value for property tax purposes. 35% tax credit also available.
Higher Incentives for Using Components Manufactured In-State• Washington State, Massachusetts, New Jersey (rules under development)
Industry Recruitment & Development
Green building or efficiency standards for new state facilities (29 + DC)
Goals to reduce energy usage (23) Requirements for evaluation/use of on-site use of renewable energy
generation (7) Derive specified % of energy for state facilities from RE – purchase
green power or install RE systems (9)
☼ Install solar by 1/1/09 on any public facility, new or existing, if cost-effective over the life of the system – California
☼ Invest in solar at a level of at least 1.5% of the total contract price for new state projects – Oregon
☼ Managers must supply 2% of a building's total energy use with on-site wind and solar power or supply a full cost and carbon analysis explaining why renewables would not be cost effective - Minnesota
Lead by Example: Solar in Public Buildings
(# of states)
What will this presentation look like next year??
• Feed-in Tariffs – When and where?• National RPS, solar carve-out?• Accelerating state RPS requirements.• Local initiatives gain ground. What is
the next “Berkeley Model”?• Next generation renewables funding
Leading Policy Approaches Financial Incentives Solar Portfolio Standards Simplified Grid Connection Net Metering
Coordinated Policies for Sustainable Markets
Rate Design & Revenue Policies REC/SREC Market Access Third-party Ownership (i.e., legality of
PPA’s) Solar Access Laws Industry Recruitment & Support Solar in Public Buildings Workforce Development Local Codes & Standards Education & Marketing
i.e., Three of the Solar Alliance “Four Pillars of
Solar”
QUESTIONS??
CONTACT:
Justin BarnesN.C. Solar Center
N.C. State [email protected]
DSIRE: www.dsireusa.org
Top Related